Deoxys (Defense) Ultra League IV Dive

Opponent list (63 mons)

Tinkaton, Corviknight, Snorlax (Shadow), Corviknight (Shadow), Melmetal, Virizion, Zygarde (Complete Forme), Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow), Mimikyu, Snorlax, Florges, Moltres (Galarian), Feraligatr (Shadow), Feraligatr, Jellicent, Giratina (Altered), Cramorant, Guzzlord, Skeledirge, Rillaboom, Lapras, Lapras (Shadow), Dusknoir, Ninetales (Alolan), Dondozo, Dusknoir (Shadow), Registeel, Blastoise, Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), Forretress, Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), Regidrago, Ninetales, Cresselia, Muk (Alolan), Clefable, Talonflame, Forretress (Shadow), Walrein, Walrein (Shadow), Deoxys (Defense), Runerigus, Steelix, Seaking, Cresselia (Shadow), Steelix (Shadow), Swampert, Toucannon, Milotic (Shadow), Primarina, Ampharos, Cradily (Shadow), Malamar (Shadow), Ampharos (Shadow), Talonflame (Shadow), Bellibolt, Seismitoad, Annihilape, Miltank, Forretress (Bug Bite), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)

Which one to build? [all shields, equal] Your stat-product rank-1 (SP1): it already wins more matchups than any other spread. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (127 spreads, no rule fits it -- the list is the build) guarantees 42 of the 82 decision matchups; Build 3 (482 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 40 others; Build 1 wide (855 spreads) keeps 38 of Build 1's 42 guaranteed matchups.

Build criteria: the same control as the one in the scatter strip below; either handle moves both

Deoxys (Defense) running Low Kick / Psycho Boost, Thunderbolt.

[all shields, equal] Your stat-product rank-1 (SP1): it already wins more matchups than any other spread. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (127 spreads, no rule fits it -- the list is the build) guarantees 42 of the 82 decision matchups; Build 3 (482 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 40 others; Build 1 wide (855 spreads) keeps 38 of Build 1's 42 guaranteed matchups.

No single-stat line on this moveset.

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

no two- or three-stat rule fits; 127 spreads by list

127

42 of 82, 0 of them material; 29 hold under every opponent-IV mode

2v1 Steelix (Shadow) (outside 18%)

2: 2v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme), 2v2 Toucannon

9/15/15 (219 of 567 matchups)

What Build 1 guarantees (42 of 82), its 127 members

all inside attack IV 8-9, defense IV 2-15, HP IV 10-15; that box also holds 41 spreads that are not members

No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build.

0v0 (8)
- 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 37%
- 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 56%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 70%
- 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 73%
- 0v0 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 75%
- 0v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 86%
- 0v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 96%
- 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 97%
0v1 (2)
- 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 75%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 75%
1v0 (9)
- 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 46%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 57%
- 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 65%
- 1v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 67%
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 73%
- 1v0 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 83%
- 1v0 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 88%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 90%
- 1v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 93%
1v1 (7)
- 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 59%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 64%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 68%
- 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 88%
- 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 88%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 91%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 97%
1v2 (1)
- 1v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 56%
2v0 (6)
- 2v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 19%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 27%
- 2v0 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 77%
- 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 80%
- 2v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 81%
- 2v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 94%
2v1 (3)
- 2v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 18%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 58%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 95%
2v2 (6)
- 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 58%
- 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 61%
- 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 70%
- 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 94%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 95%

Members (127), highest stat product first

Build 1 wide

~ Atk >= 127.00 + Def/HP staircase (7 steps)

855

38 of 82, 0 of them material; 24 hold under every opponent-IV mode

6: 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow), 2v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme), +4 more

What the wider rule keeps and gives up

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
121	284
122	284
123	284
124	277
125	277
126	276
127	276

The rule covers 96% of the same spreads (36 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region.

The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 127 spreads in 855 of its own, and keeps 38 of Build 1's 42 guaranteed matchups (none of them material).

The 4 it gives up out here: 2v1 Steelix (Shadow) (grid 20%), 2v0 Steelix (Shadow) (grid 22%) and 2v0 Steelix (grid 29%), and 1 more.

Build 3 (bulk)

no two- or three-stat rule fits; 482 spreads by list

482

40 of 82, 0 of them material; 27 hold under every opponent-IV mode

2v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (outside 25%)

4: 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow), 2v0 Steelix, +2 more

12/13/15 (221 of 567 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 3 guarantees (40 of 82), its 482 members

all inside attack IV 10-15, defense IV 2-15, HP IV 7-15; that box also holds 274 spreads that are not members

No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build.

0v0 (7)
- 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 51%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 67%
- 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 71%
- 0v0 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 73%
- 0v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 85%
- 0v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 96%
- 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 97%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
0v1 (2)
- 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 72%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 73%
1v0 (9)
- 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 40%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 52%
- 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 61%
- 1v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 64%
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 71%
- 1v0 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 82%
- 1v0 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 87%
- 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 89%
- 1v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 93%
1v1 (7)
- 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 61%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 64%
- 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 87%
- 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 90%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 97%
1v2 (1)
- 1v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 51%
2v0 (5)
- 2v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 25%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v0 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 75%
- 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 78%
- 2v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 79%
- 2v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 93%
2v1 (2)
- 2v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 54%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 95%
2v2 (7)
- 2v2 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 26%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 43%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 54%
- 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 57%
- 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 67%
- 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 93%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 94%

Members (482), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 3 (bulk)'s most-winning spread 12/13/15@49.5 wins 2 more matchups overall (221 against 219, of 567), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 2 more of the 82 decision matchups (42 against 40).

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

no two- or three-stat rule fits; 482 spreads by list

482

21 of 42 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 40 of 82 overall, 0 of them material; 27 hold under every opponent-IV mode

2v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (outside 25%)

1: 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow)

12/13/15 (76 of 189 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 1 guarantees (21 of 42 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 40 of 82 overall), its 482 members

all inside attack IV 10-15, defense IV 2-15, HP IV 7-15; that box also holds 274 spreads that are not members

No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build.

0v0 (7)
- 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 51%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 67%
- 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 71%
- 0v0 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 73%
- 0v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 85%
- 0v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 96%
- 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 97%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
0v1 (2)
- 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 72%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 73%
1v0 (9)
- 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 40%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 52%
- 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 61%
- 1v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 64%
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 71%
- 1v0 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 82%
- 1v0 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 87%
- 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 89%
- 1v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 93%
1v1 (7)
- 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 61%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 64%
- 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 87%
- 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 90%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 97%
1v2 (1)
- 1v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 51%
2v0 (5)
- 2v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 25%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v0 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 75%
- 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 78%
- 2v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 79%
- 2v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 93%
2v1 (2)
- 2v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 54%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 95%
2v2 (7)
- 2v2 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 26%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 43%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 54%
- 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 57%
- 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 67%
- 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 93%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 94%

Members (482), highest stat product first

Build 1 wide

~ Atk >= 127.00 + Def/HP staircase (9 steps)

1159

19 of 42 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 34 of 82 overall, 0 of them material; 23 hold under every opponent-IV mode

7: 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow), 0v1 Virizion, +5 more

What the wider rule keeps and gives up

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
119	287
120	284
121	278.9
122	277
123	277
124	277
125	277
126	276
127	276

The rule covers 95% of the same spreads (57 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region.

The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 482 spreads in 1159 of its own, and keeps 19 of Build 1's 21 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (34 of its 40 overall, none of them material).

The 6 it gives up out here: 2v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (grid 34%), 2v2 Toucannon (grid 35%) and 1v2 Lapras (Shadow) (grid 57%), and 3 more.

Build 2 (fork)

no two- or three-stat rule fits; 471 spreads by list

471

17 of 42 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 33 of 82 overall, 0 of them material; 21 hold under every opponent-IV mode

0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (outside 31%)

8: 0v0 Corviknight, 0v0 Snorlax, +6 more

9/12/15 (74 of 189 matchups)

What Build 2 guarantees (17 of 42 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 33 of 82 overall), its 471 members

all inside attack IV 3-9, defense IV 2-15, HP IV 10-15; that box also holds 117 spreads that are not members

No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build.

0v0 (6)
- 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 31%
- 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 67%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 71%
- 0v0 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 73%
- 0v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 85%
- 0v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 96%
0v1 (2)
- 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 72%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 73%
1v0 (7)
- 1v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 62%
- 1v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 64%
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 71%
- 1v0 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 82%
- 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 89%
- 1v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 93%
1v1 (6)
- 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 61%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 65%
- 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 87%
- 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 87%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 90%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 97%
1v2 (1)
- 1v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 51%
2v0 (4)
- 2v0 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 75%
- 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 78%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 79%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 93%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v1 (2)
- 2v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 55%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 95%
2v2 (5)
- 2v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 55%
- 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 58%
- 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 68%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 93%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 94%

Members (471), highest stat product first

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

~ Atk >= 127.00 + Def/HP staircase (9 steps)

951

7 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 35 of 82 overall, 0 of them material; 23 hold under every opponent-IV mode

1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (outside 31%)

nothing the other builds guarantee

9/12/15 (23 of 63 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 1 guarantees (7 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 35 of 82 overall), its steps and its 951 members

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
119	287
120	284
121	284
122	284
123	284
124	277
125	277
126	276
127	276

The rule covers 96% of the same spreads (37 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the build.

0v0 (7)
- 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 44%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 62%
- 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 66%
- 0v0 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 68%
- 0v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 83%
- 0v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 95%
- 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 96%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
0v1 (1)
- 0v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 69%
1v0 (9)
- 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 31%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 45%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 56%
- 1v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 59%
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 66%
- 1v0 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 79%
- 1v0 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 85%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 87%
- 1v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 91%
1v1 (7)
- 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 55%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 59%
- 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 85%
- 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 85%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 88%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 96%
2v0 (4)
- 2v0 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 71%
- 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 74%
- 2v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 76%
- 2v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 92%
2v1 (1)
- 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 94%
2v2 (6)
- 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 35%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 48%
- 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 51%
- 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 63%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 92%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 94%

Members (951), highest stat product first

Build 1 wide

Atk >= 121.00 + Def/HP staircase (9 steps)

2044

5 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 16 of 82 overall, 0 of them material; 10 hold under every opponent-IV mode

19: 0v0 Corviknight, 0v0 Snorlax, +17 more

What the wider rule keeps and gives up

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
119	284
120	284
121	284
122	284
123	284
124	277
125	277
126	276
127	276

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 951 spreads in 2044 of its own, and keeps 5 of Build 1's 7 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (16 of its 35 overall, none of them material).

The 19 it gives up out here: 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (grid 47%), 2v2 Empoleon (grid 50%) and 0v0 Corviknight (grid 57%), and 16 more.

Rates: outside N% is the share of the spreads NOT in that build that win the same matchup anyway; grid N% (the Notable spreads list and the cards at the top of the page) is the share of all the spreads on the grid. Weight follows the rate: bold = fewer than half of them win it; bold and underlined = fewer than a quarter; bold, underlined and italic = fewer than a tenth; dim = more than nine in ten win it anyway.

Each build's guarantee list is sorted by outside rate: how often the spreads NOT in that build win the same matchup anyway. The lower the rate, the rarer the guarantee.

Against the 31 spreads the mirror-slayer protocol converges on for Deoxys (Defense) (bulk-first here), attack of 131.62 and up wins charge-move priority against 16 of them, and 132.01 and up against 28. Inside a build, take the highest attack you have: Build 3 clears the first cut with 218 of 482 and the second with 154; Build 1 clears neither with any of its 127.

Is mine in one of these?

Paste your Poke Genie CSV, or add one spread by hand, in Check my collection below; the answer comes back here, grouped by build, and your collection stays in your browser.

Shield scenario:

Y: Color:

Stat-product rank against matchups won with PvPoke-default opponent IVs at the league cap over the whole opponent pool and, with Shield scenario on all, every baked shield state -- the view the single-stat line in the expander below was derived on. The Shield scenario selector on this row is the section's own; the scatter's dropdowns and the opponent filter do not drive this panel.

SP1 12/13/15, 11/15/15

Notable spreads

Every single spread this page names, on one list: the spread that wins the most matchups, the one with the highest avg battle score, SP1, and each build's most-winning member. Entries whose decision-matchup wins overlap by 90% or more are merged, because two spreads that win the same matchups are one offer.

12/13/15 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios) / Stat-product rank-1 (SP1) / Build 3's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 3, which guarantees 40 of the 67 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 2v2 Ninetales (grid 3%), 0v1 Snorlax (grid 3%) and 2v2 Seaking (grid 4%)

What else is true of 12/13/15

11/15/15 (Highest avg battle score) and 9/15/15 (Build 1's most-winning member) differ from it by 3 to 5 decision matchups, so this entry is the offer and they are spellings of it.

What to do with this: Build stat-product rank-1 (SP1): it already wins the most matchups on this grid. The builds above change which matchups you win, not how many of them.

The single-stat line

2 of the 5 movesets on this page carry a line. This page is Low Kick / Psycho Boost, Thunderbolt, and it carries no line; Low Kick / Rock Slide, Thunderbolt is at least 283.93 defense; Counter / Psycho Boost, Rock Slide is at least 284.86 defense; Counter / Psycho Boost, Thunderbolt and Low Kick / Psycho Boost, Rock Slide carry no line.

Line: none
Closest: Atk >= 127.72 -- 1v0 Steelix (Shadow), rank 47, 112 spreads of 4096 on the wrong side
SP1: 12/13/15 -- wins 221 of 567
Alternative: Def >= 285.59, HP >= 116 (1308 spreads, 31.9%)
Decision width: 0 matchups

No attack, defense or HP threshold decides a matchup for Deoxys (Defense) running Low Kick / Psycho Boost, Thunderbolt in Ultra League; build for stat product. The closest thing to a line is 127.72 attack in the 1v0 against Steelix (Shadow), rank 47. Nothing below it wins, and 1936 of the 2048 spreads at or above it do. It is not a build line because 94.5% of the spreads at or above it win, under the 97% a rule with one clean side needs, and 112 of 4096 spreads sit on the wrong side of it, over the 20 a near-exact rule allows.

What bulk does carry is 285.59 defense with 116 HP -- 1308 spreads, 31.9% of the grid. They win 1 contested matchup -- 1v0 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- that at most 1% of the spreads outside them win. 181 of the 216 spreads a raid, research or trade encounter can produce (83.8%) are inside it. SP1, 12/13/15 at L49.5, wins 221 of its 567 matchups, and is inside that pair. No spread on this grid wins more matchups than SP1 does, so the whole IV decision here is zero matchups wide.

rank-1

Shield scenario:

Why these regions

Why these regions and not others. The set panel below is every candidate region the builds were cut from. Under it, the same grid grouped by which contested matchups a spread wins -- its win/loss fingerprint, not its score -- drawn on the stat planes where a region is a shape; crossing a breakpoint or bulkpoint moves a spread to the next cluster.

The set panel (an UpSet plot: a bar chart of set intersections, Lex et al. 2014). Left: the named sets the lattice was built from (rows, labelled 'spreads in the set / decision matchups every member of it wins') and the candidate regions made by intersecting them (columns -- bar height is spreads, the number above it is decision matchups guaranteed in the shield scenarios this setting counts, and a coloured column is one of the builds in the table above). A dot means the region sits inside that row's set. The letters index THIS setting's own eight sets and are re-assigned when the Build criteria change, so compare the row names across Build criteria settings, not the letters.

clusters

Shield scenario:

Lattice view: 95% of this dive's IV spreads sit at the same level (L50) -- this species does not reach the league CP cap, so it is pinned at the max power-up level. At a fixed level each battle stat tracks a single IV, so attack / defense / HP each take only ~16 values and the panels look like a sparse grid: each visible point stacks the spreads that share a stat pair (up to 16, one per remaining IV). This is expected, not missing data -- the clustering still runs on the full set of win/loss fingerprints.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1304	126.8	282.7	117	#1125-#4096	7.2	-
C1	2792	127.5	283.9	123	#1-#3665	14.1	Melmetal (+80pp), Feraligatr (+76pp), Shadow Ampharos (+74pp), Dondozo (+71pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Ampharos	2%	76%
Corviknight	47%	62%
Shadow Corviknight	0%	57%
Seismitoad	5%	53%
Shadow Forretress	34%	34%
Dondozo	22%	93%
Primarina	0%	41%
Blastoise	5%	37%
Melmetal	19%	100%
Feraligatr	24%	100%
Miltank	46%	93%
Toucannon	0%	25%
Alolan Ninetales	0%	22%
Cramorant	74%	93%
Shadow Feraligatr	11%	12%
Annihilape	74%	100%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	74%	100%
Shadow Cradily	0%	8%
Deoxys (Defense)	4%	5%
Virizion	89%	100%
Snorlax	100%	96%
Shadow Talonflame	93%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Ampharos	53%	wins iff hp >= 121	92%	named
Corviknight	57%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	93%	named
Shadow Corviknight	39%	wins iff hp >= 123	92%	named
Seismitoad	38%	wins iff sp >= 4,451,463	83%	named
Shadow Forretress	34%	wins iff atk >= 130.25	86%	named
Dondozo	71%	wins iff hp >= 118	84%	named
Primarina	28%	wins iff hp >= 125	94%	named
Blastoise	27%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	77%	named
Melmetal	74%	wins iff hp >= 117	91%	named
Feraligatr	76%	wins iff hp >= 117	95%	named
Miltank	78%	wins iff hp >= 116	85%	named
Toucannon	17%	wins iff hp >= 126	91%	named
Alolan Ninetales	15%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	89%	named
Cramorant	87%	wins iff atk >= 123.52	94%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	11%	wins iff atk >= 132.37	100%	named
Annihilape	92%	wins iff sp >= 4,068,054	94%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	92%	wins iff sp >= 4,068,054	94%	named
Shadow Cradily	5%	wins iff hp >= 127	96%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	4%	wins iff atk >= 133.21	100%	named
Virizion	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,986,775	98%	named
Snorlax	97%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Talonflame	98%	wins iff sp >= 3,892,183	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2723	126.8	283.2	119	#310-#4096	1.9	-
C1	1279	127.9	284.2	125	#1-#3044	4.1	Shadow Snorlax (+100pp), Virizion (+37pp), Shadow Empoleon (+30pp), Cramorant (+25pp)
C2	94	133.5	282.5	122	#192-#1188	5.3	Miltank (+100pp), Shadow Lapras (+85pp), Shadow Talonflame (+44pp); trades away Shadow Snorlax (-67pp), Shadow Empoleon (-32pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2
Shadow Talonflame	44%	56%	100%
Shadow Snorlax	0%	100%	33%
Virizion	63%	100%	100%
Cramorant	68%	93%	100%
Shadow Lapras	16%	15%	100%
Shadow Empoleon	2%	32%	0%
Snorlax	0%	11%	0%
Shadow Walrein	0%	8%	0%
Miltank	0%	0%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Talonflame	49%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	99%	named
Shadow Snorlax	32%	wins iff hp >= 122	88%	named
Virizion	75%	wins iff hp >= 121	81%	named
Cramorant	76%	wins iff atk >= 123.52	95%	named
Shadow Lapras	18%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Shadow Empoleon	12%	wins iff hp >= 126	92%	named
Snorlax	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,716,295	97%	named
Shadow Walrein	2%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Miltank	2%	wins iff def < 276.48	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1034	127.3	282.7	116	#1125-#4096	7.0	-
C1	3062	127.3	283.8	123	#1-#3959	11.1	Ampharos (+99pp), Registeel (+98pp), Galarian Moltres (+88pp), Florges (+82pp); trades away Alolan Ninetales (-60pp), Clefable (-26pp), Swampert (-15pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Steelix	39%	50%
Seismitoad	54%	58%
Rillaboom	36%	65%
Shadow Malamar	62%	63%
Clefable	56%	30%
Galarian Moltres	0%	88%
Shadow Cresselia	9%	40%
Florges	7%	89%
Registeel	1%	99%
Ampharos	1%	100%
Alolan Ninetales	69%	10%
Cresselia	25%	25%
Regidrago	19%	17%
Deoxys (Defense)	81%	85%
Swampert	100%	85%
Shadow Forretress	62%	100%
Forretress	74%	100%
Tinkaton	6%	3%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Steelix	47%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	97%	named
Seismitoad	57%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	93%	named
Rillaboom	58%	wins iff sp >= 4,313,057	86%	named
Shadow Malamar	62%	wins iff atk >= 126.04	100%	named
Clefable	36%	wins iff atk >= 126.89	80%	named
Galarian Moltres	66%	wins iff hp >= 119	97%	named
Shadow Cresselia	32%	wins iff def >= 285.59	95%	named
Florges	68%	wins iff hp >= 120	92%	named
Registeel	74%	wins iff hp >= 119	95%	named
Ampharos	75%	wins iff hp >= 117	94%	named
Alolan Ninetales	25%	wins iff hp < 116	88%	named
Cresselia	25%	wins iff atk >= 131.09	100%	named
Regidrago	18%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	84%	wins iff atk >= 123.52	97%	named
Swampert	89%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Forretress	90%	wins iff sp >= 4,029,128	93%	named
Forretress	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,963,827	95%	named
Tinkaton	4%	wins iff atk >= 133.61	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3674	126.6	283.6	121	#1-#4096	6.7	-
C1	422	133.1	282.9	120	#85-#2989	10.8	Shadow Cradily (+100pp), Shadow Feraligatr (+99pp), Walrein (+97pp), Miltank (+45pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Miltank	48%	94%
Toucannon	55%	100%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	66%	57%
Ninetales	69%	67%
Dondozo	24%	19%
Ampharos	17%	6%
Walrein	3%	100%
Cramorant	87%	100%
Shadow Feraligatr	1%	100%
Snorlax	87%	100%
Shadow Cradily	0%	100%
Melmetal	10%	0%
Shadow Snorlax	91%	89%
Deoxys (Defense)	3%	47%
Registeel	8%	0%
Seismitoad	4%	4%
Shadow Lapras	97%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Miltank	53%	wins iff sp >= 4,341,911	85%	named
Toucannon	60%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	89%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	66%	wins iff def >= 283.94	84%	named
Ninetales	69%	wins iff hp >= 118	92%	named
Dondozo	24%	wins iff def >= 287.32	100%	named
Ampharos	16%	wins iff hp >= 126	90%	named
Walrein	13%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	98%	named
Cramorant	88%	wins iff atk >= 123.52	93%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	11%	wins iff atk >= 132.37	100%	named
Snorlax	89%	wins iff sp >= 4,091,192	95%	named
Shadow Cradily	10%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	100%	named
Melmetal	9%	wins iff sp >= 4,702,551	92%	named
Shadow Snorlax	91%	wins iff sp >= 3,935,906	92%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	8%	wins iff atk >= 133.21	97%	named
Registeel	7%	wins iff sp >= 4,716,337	94%	named
Seismitoad	4%	wins iff sp >= 4,727,011	96%	named
Shadow Lapras	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,951,134	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	294	121.8	283.0	117	#3011-#4096	0.8	-
C1	647	128.9	282.9	116	#769-#4058	2.9	Rillaboom (+100pp), Clefable (+48pp), Zygarde (Complete Forme) (+39pp), Shadow Dusknoir (+33pp)
C2	474	121.8	284.0	123	#986-#3819	3.4	Jellicent (+100pp), Clefable (+50pp), Steelix (+41pp), Guzzlord (+23pp); trades away Rillaboom (-100pp), Zygarde (Complete Forme) (-39pp), Shadow Dusknoir (-33pp)
C3	1577	128.1	283.8	120	#265-#3867	4.4	Rillaboom (+100pp), Zygarde (Complete Forme) (+36pp), Shadow Dusknoir (+33pp); trades away Steelix (-41pp), Guzzlord (-22pp)
C4	541	126.1	283.4	126	#29-#2901	5.8	Steelix (+94pp), Guzzlord (+44pp), Shadow Steelix (+32pp); trades away Zygarde (Complete Forme) (-36pp)
C5	563	131.4	283.4	125	#1-#1407	7.7	Zygarde (Complete Forme) (+100pp), Shadow Steelix (+55pp), Guzzlord (+20pp), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (+17pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2	C3	C4	C5
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	0%	39%	0%	36%	0%	100%
Steelix	0%	0%	41%	0%	94%	85%
Jellicent	9%	0%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Shadow Steelix	0%	0%	0%	8%	40%	95%
Clefable	2%	50%	100%	88%	100%	100%
Rillaboom	0%	100%	0%	100%	100%	100%
Guzzlord	0%	0%	23%	1%	45%	65%
Shadow Dusknoir	67%	100%	67%	100%	100%	100%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	0%	2%	6%	6%	3%	20%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	34%	wins iff atk >= 129.41	96%	named
Steelix	29%	wins iff hp >= 124	97%	named
Jellicent	78%	wins iff hp >= 119	86%	named
Shadow Steelix	22%	wins iff sp >= 4,547,610	92%	named
Clefable	80%	wins iff sp >= 4,137,293	90%	named
Rillaboom	81%	wins iff atk >= 123.52	100%	named
Guzzlord	18%	wins iff sp >= 4,610,158	88%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	94%	wins iff atk >= 121.84	100%	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	6%	wins iff def >= 289.90	96%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2330	124.6	283.7	120	#237-#4096	3.8	-
C1	1766	130.7	283.3	122	#1-#3615	7.1	Seismitoad (+82pp), Shadow Malamar (+69pp), Ampharos (+52pp), Shadow Steelix (+47pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Seismitoad	18%	100%
Shadow Feraligatr	41%	84%
Ampharos	46%	98%
Shadow Malamar	1%	71%
Shadow Forretress	77%	79%
Shadow Steelix	0%	47%
Shadow Cresselia	10%	16%
Alolan Ninetales	0%	18%
Talonflame	94%	97%
Shadow Ampharos	94%	99%
Clefable	0%	6%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Seismitoad	53%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	97%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	60%	wins iff hp >= 120	88%	named
Ampharos	69%	wins iff atk >= 125.20	100%	named
Shadow Malamar	31%	wins iff atk >= 130.25	100%	named
Shadow Forretress	78%	wins iff sp < 4,682,720	81%	named
Shadow Steelix	20%	wins iff sp >= 4,564,556	92%	named
Shadow Cresselia	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,695,316	89%	named
Alolan Ninetales	8%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	97%	named
Talonflame	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,905,384	95%	named
Shadow Ampharos	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,915,763	96%	named
Clefable	2%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1623	127.4	283.0	117	#704-#4096	5.1	-
C1	1314	124.1	283.9	123	#237-#3819	7.1	Shadow Corviknight (+96pp), Walrein (+95pp), Virizion (+46pp), Dondozo (+28pp); trades away Empoleon (-47pp), Cramorant (-31pp), Toucannon (-23pp)
C2	1159	130.7	283.8	124	#1-#2224	10.8	Empoleon (+96pp), Toucannon (+92pp), Shadow Steelix (+62pp), Corviknight (+48pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2
Empoleon	51%	4%	100%
Shadow Corviknight	1%	97%	100%
Walrein	5%	100%	100%
Toucannon	23%	0%	92%
Virizion	2%	48%	45%
Dondozo	48%	75%	100%
Corviknight	13%	7%	56%
Cramorant	100%	69%	66%
Shadow Steelix	0%	0%	62%
Deoxys (Defense)	0%	0%	41%
Snorlax	84%	100%	100%
Lapras	88%	100%	100%
Shadow Cradily	88%	100%	100%
Melmetal	6%	0%	8%
Seaking	0%	8%	6%
Ninetales	0%	5%	4%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Empoleon	50%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	100%	named
Shadow Corviknight	60%	wins iff hp >= 120	94%	named
Walrein	62%	wins iff hp >= 119	94%	named
Toucannon	35%	wins iff atk >= 128.57	91%	named
Virizion	29%	wins iff def >= 284.86	86%	named
Dondozo	71%	wins iff sp >= 4,229,058	85%	named
Corviknight	23%	wins iff atk >= 131.09	91%	named
Cramorant	80%	wins iff def >= 277.30	80%	named
Shadow Steelix	18%	wins iff sp >= 4,578,480	93%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,621,882	93%	named
Snorlax	94%	wins iff sp >= 3,986,775	96%	named
Lapras	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,992,299	96%	named
Shadow Cradily	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,992,299	96%	named
Melmetal	5%	wins iff atk >= 133.21	100%	named
Seaking	4%	wins iff hp >= 127	99%	named
Ninetales	3%	wins iff hp >= 127	97%	named

all scenarios: 102 win/loss bits (one per contested opponent per scenario) concatenated across 7 of 9 shield scenarios (0v2, 1v2 excluded as degenerate); 2209 distinct win patterns; K=2 clusters (silhouette 0.34); split at atk 127.31.

Sharpest single scenarios on this page: 2v0 shields (K=6, silhouette 0.48 over 9 contested opponents, split hp 123.50) and 1v0 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.47 over 18 contested opponents, split hp 118.50) -- pick them in the dropdown above.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2048	123.9	283.6	121	#237-#4096	38.1	-
C1	2048	130.6	283.4	121	#1-#3775	59.6	Empoleon [2v2] (+100pp), Shadow Talonflame [0v1] (+98pp), Shadow Steelix [1v0] (+95pp), Seismitoad [2v1] (+94pp); trades away Miltank [0v0] (-28pp)

Per-cluster win rates vs each contested opponent

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Empoleon [2v2]	0%	100%
Shadow Talonflame [0v1]	0%	98%
Shadow Ampharos [0v0]	53%	53%
Shadow Steelix [1v0]	0%	95%
Miltank [1v1]	23%	83%
Seismitoad [2v1]	6%	100%
Corviknight [0v0]	14%	100%
Seismitoad [1v0]	14%	100%
Rillaboom [1v0]	23%	93%
Shadow Feraligatr [2v1]	50%	70%
Shadow Corviknight [2v2]	60%	60%
Toucannon [1v1]	21%	99%
Shadow Corviknight [0v0]	39%	38%
Seismitoad [0v0]	5%	70%
Shadow Malamar [1v0]	25%	100%
Walrein [2v2]	62%	62%
Clefable [1v0]	8%	65%
Toucannon [2v2]	0%	70%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	66%	65%
Shadow Forretress [0v0]	12%	56%
Galarian Moltres [1v0]	66%	66%
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [2v0]	0%	67%
Shadow Snorlax [0v1]	28%	36%
Shadow Cresselia [1v0]	33%	31%
Florges [1v0]	65%	72%
Ninetales [1v1]	68%	70%
Ampharos [2v1]	38%	100%
Shadow Malamar [2v1]	0%	62%
Dondozo [0v0]	63%	78%
Virizion [2v2]	30%	28%
Steelix [2v0]	26%	31%
Dondozo [2v2]	59%	84%
Primarina [0v0]	29%	27%
Blastoise [0v0]	20%	35%
Melmetal [0v0]	73%	75%
Registeel [1v0]	74%	74%
Ampharos [1v0]	75%	75%
Alolan Ninetales [1v0]	16%	33%
Cresselia [1v0]	0%	49%
Virizion [0v1]	75%	75%
Feraligatr [0v0]	76%	76%
Dondozo [1v1]	25%	23%
Cramorant [0v1]	59%	94%
Corviknight [2v2]	5%	42%
Jellicent [2v0]	74%	82%
Shadow Forretress [2v1]	77%	79%
Miltank [0v0]	92%	64%
Shadow Steelix [2v0]	2%	41%
Shadow Steelix [2v1]	0%	41%
Clefable [2v0]	69%	91%
Cramorant [2v2]	81%	79%
Rillaboom [2v0]	62%	100%
Guzzlord [2v0]	14%	21%
Shadow Steelix [2v2]	0%	35%
Shadow Lapras [0v1]	0%	35%
Regidrago [1v0]	0%	35%
Toucannon [0v0]	18%	15%
Ampharos [1v1]	9%	23%
Deoxys (Defense) [1v0]	68%	100%
Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	9%	21%
Cramorant [0v0]	74%	100%
Walrein [1v1]	3%	22%
Shadow Cresselia [2v1]	12%	13%
Cramorant [1v1]	77%	100%
Shadow Empoleon [0v1]	13%	10%
Deoxys (Defense) [2v2]	0%	23%
Shadow Feraligatr [0v0]	0%	23%
Shadow Feraligatr [1v1]	0%	23%
Swampert [1v0]	77%	100%
Snorlax [1v1]	77%	100%
Shadow Cradily [1v1]	0%	21%
Shadow Forretress [1v0]	86%	95%
Melmetal [1v1]	11%	8%
Shadow Snorlax [1v1]	91%	91%
Annihilape [0v0]	83%	100%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [0v0]	83%	100%
Alolan Ninetales [2v1]	0%	15%
Deoxys (Defense) [1v1]	0%	15%
Registeel [1v1]	8%	6%
Forretress [1v0]	93%	94%
Shadow Dusknoir [2v0]	88%	100%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [2v0]	4%	9%
Snorlax [2v2]	92%	96%
Shadow Cradily [0v0]	7%	4%
Lapras [2v2]	90%	100%
Shadow Cradily [2v2]	90%	100%
Melmetal [2v2]	0%	10%
Talonflame [2v1]	95%	95%
Seismitoad [1v1]	3%	6%
Deoxys (Defense) [0v0]	0%	9%
Seaking [2v2]	5%	3%
Tinkaton [1v0]	0%	8%
Shadow Ampharos [2v1]	96%	96%
Virizion [0v0]	93%	100%
Snorlax [0v1]	1%	6%
Ninetales [2v2]	4%	3%
Snorlax [0v0]	95%	100%
Shadow Lapras [1v1]	95%	100%
Clefable [2v1]	0%	5%
Shadow Walrein [0v1]	1%	4%
Shadow Talonflame [0v0]	98%	98%
Miltank [0v1]	0%	5%

Green tint = the cluster mostly wins that matchup, red tint = mostly loses; the percentage is the share of the cluster's IVs that win.

Stat rules that reproduce the clusters (in-sample accuracy 100.0%)

atk < 127.31:
  -> cluster C0 (n=2048)
atk >= 127.31:
  -> cluster C1 (n=2048)

Depth-3 decision tree over (atk, def, hp). Accuracy is in-sample (regularized by a minimum leaf size), not cross-validated -- read it as "how well the clusters reduce to stat regions", not a prediction claim.

Matchup flip thresholds (candidate anchors)

The single stat and threshold that most accurately predicts win/loss across all IVs -- misclassifications allowed, so it is a diagnostic and a candidate anchor, not a build target. The "flips at" cutoffs under "Threats where your build choice matters" answer the other question (the lowest cutoff whose 75/25 split is clean) and are usually higher for the same opponent.

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Empoleon [2v2]	50%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	100%	named
Shadow Talonflame [0v1]	49%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	99%	named
Shadow Ampharos [0v0]	53%	wins iff hp >= 121	92%	named
Shadow Steelix [1v0]	47%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	97%	named
Miltank [1v1]	53%	wins iff sp >= 4,341,911	85%	named
Seismitoad [2v1]	53%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	97%	named
Corviknight [0v0]	57%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	93%	named
Seismitoad [1v0]	57%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	93%	named
Rillaboom [1v0]	58%	wins iff sp >= 4,313,057	86%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [2v1]	60%	wins iff hp >= 120	88%	named
Shadow Corviknight [2v2]	60%	wins iff hp >= 120	94%	named
Toucannon [1v1]	60%	wins iff atk >= 127.73	89%	named
Shadow Corviknight [0v0]	39%	wins iff hp >= 123	92%	named
Seismitoad [0v0]	38%	wins iff sp >= 4,451,463	83%	named
Shadow Malamar [1v0]	62%	wins iff atk >= 126.04	100%	named
Walrein [2v2]	62%	wins iff hp >= 119	94%	named
Clefable [1v0]	36%	wins iff atk >= 126.89	80%	named
Toucannon [2v2]	35%	wins iff atk >= 128.57	91%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	66%	wins iff def >= 283.94	84%	named
Shadow Forretress [0v0]	34%	wins iff atk >= 130.25	86%	named
Galarian Moltres [1v0]	66%	wins iff hp >= 119	97%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [2v0]	34%	wins iff atk >= 129.41	96%	named
Shadow Snorlax [0v1]	32%	wins iff hp >= 122	88%	named
Shadow Cresselia [1v0]	32%	wins iff def >= 285.59	95%	named
Florges [1v0]	68%	wins iff hp >= 120	92%	named
Ninetales [1v1]	69%	wins iff hp >= 118	92%	named
Ampharos [2v1]	69%	wins iff atk >= 125.20	100%	named
Shadow Malamar [2v1]	31%	wins iff atk >= 130.25	100%	named
Dondozo [0v0]	71%	wins iff hp >= 118	84%	named
Virizion [2v2]	29%	wins iff def >= 284.86	86%	named
Steelix [2v0]	29%	wins iff hp >= 124	97%	named
Dondozo [2v2]	71%	wins iff sp >= 4,229,058	85%	named
Primarina [0v0]	28%	wins iff hp >= 125	94%	named
Blastoise [0v0]	27%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	77%	named
Melmetal [0v0]	74%	wins iff hp >= 117	91%	named
Registeel [1v0]	74%	wins iff hp >= 119	95%	named
Ampharos [1v0]	75%	wins iff hp >= 117	94%	named
Alolan Ninetales [1v0]	25%	wins iff hp < 116	88%	named
Cresselia [1v0]	25%	wins iff atk >= 131.09	100%	named
Virizion [0v1]	75%	wins iff hp >= 121	81%	named
Feraligatr [0v0]	76%	wins iff hp >= 117	95%	named
Dondozo [1v1]	24%	wins iff def >= 287.32	100%	named
Cramorant [0v1]	76%	wins iff atk >= 123.52	95%	named
Corviknight [2v2]	23%	wins iff atk >= 131.09	91%	named
Jellicent [2v0]	78%	wins iff hp >= 119	86%	named
Shadow Forretress [2v1]	78%	wins iff sp < 4,682,720	81%	named
Miltank [0v0]	78%	wins iff hp >= 116	85%	named
Shadow Steelix [2v0]	22%	wins iff sp >= 4,547,610	92%	named
Shadow Steelix [2v1]	20%	wins iff sp >= 4,564,556	92%	named
Clefable [2v0]	80%	wins iff sp >= 4,137,293	90%	named
Cramorant [2v2]	80%	wins iff def >= 277.30	80%	named
Rillaboom [2v0]	81%	wins iff atk >= 123.52	100%	named
Guzzlord [2v0]	18%	wins iff sp >= 4,610,158	88%	named
Shadow Steelix [2v2]	18%	wins iff sp >= 4,578,480	93%	named
Shadow Lapras [0v1]	18%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Regidrago [1v0]	18%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Toucannon [0v0]	17%	wins iff hp >= 126	91%	named
Ampharos [1v1]	16%	wins iff hp >= 126	90%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [1v0]	84%	wins iff atk >= 123.52	97%	named
Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	15%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	89%	named
Cramorant [0v0]	87%	wins iff atk >= 123.52	94%	named
Walrein [1v1]	13%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	98%	named
Shadow Cresselia [2v1]	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,695,316	89%	named
Cramorant [1v1]	88%	wins iff atk >= 123.52	93%	named
Shadow Empoleon [0v1]	12%	wins iff hp >= 126	92%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [2v2]	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,621,882	93%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [0v0]	11%	wins iff atk >= 132.37	100%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [1v1]	11%	wins iff atk >= 132.37	100%	named
Swampert [1v0]	89%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Snorlax [1v1]	89%	wins iff sp >= 4,091,192	95%	named
Shadow Cradily [1v1]	10%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	100%	named
Shadow Forretress [1v0]	90%	wins iff sp >= 4,029,128	93%	named
Melmetal [1v1]	9%	wins iff sp >= 4,702,551	92%	named
Shadow Snorlax [1v1]	91%	wins iff sp >= 3,935,906	92%	named
Annihilape [0v0]	92%	wins iff sp >= 4,068,054	94%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [0v0]	92%	wins iff sp >= 4,068,054	94%	named
Alolan Ninetales [2v1]	8%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	97%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [1v1]	8%	wins iff atk >= 133.21	97%	named
Registeel [1v1]	7%	wins iff sp >= 4,716,337	94%	named
Forretress [1v0]	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,963,827	95%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [2v0]	94%	wins iff atk >= 121.84	100%	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [2v0]	6%	wins iff def >= 289.90	96%	named
Snorlax [2v2]	94%	wins iff sp >= 3,986,775	96%	named
Shadow Cradily [0v0]	5%	wins iff hp >= 127	96%	named
Lapras [2v2]	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,992,299	96%	named
Shadow Cradily [2v2]	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,992,299	96%	named
Melmetal [2v2]	5%	wins iff atk >= 133.21	100%	named
Talonflame [2v1]	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,905,384	95%	named
Seismitoad [1v1]	4%	wins iff sp >= 4,727,011	96%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [0v0]	4%	wins iff atk >= 133.21	100%	named
Seaking [2v2]	4%	wins iff hp >= 127	99%	named
Tinkaton [1v0]	4%	wins iff atk >= 133.61	100%	named
Shadow Ampharos [2v1]	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,915,763	96%	named
Virizion [0v0]	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,986,775	98%	named
Snorlax [0v1]	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,716,295	97%	named
Ninetales [2v2]	3%	wins iff hp >= 127	97%	named
Snorlax [0v0]	97%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Lapras [1v1]	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,951,134	98%	named
Clefable [2v1]	2%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Walrein [0v1]	2%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Talonflame [0v0]	98%	wins iff sp >= 3,892,183	98%	named
Miltank [0v1]	2%	wins iff def < 276.48	98%	named

Rows are ordered by discriminating power (win rate closest to 50%). "Rule accuracy" is how well that single stat threshold predicts the win/loss across all IVs, and is only shown when it beats always-predicting the majority outcome; high-accuracy UNNAMED rows are candidate new anchors. "Named" means an authored anchor names that opponent (alt-moveset / IV-variant rows inherit their base opponent's anchor).

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1350	127.3	282.8	117	#1007-#4096	17.7	-
C1	2746	127.3	283.9	123	#1-#3819	30.7	Walrein [2v2] (+93pp), Shadow Corviknight [2v2] (+88pp), Ninetales [1v1] (+88pp), Melmetal [0v0] (+79pp); trades away Cramorant [2v2] (-29pp), Toucannon [1v1] (-28pp)

Computed at bake time for moveset LOW_KICK / PSYCHO_BOOST, THUNDERBOLT with PvPoke default opponent IVs and bait-selective shield play, over the full opponent pool; this does not follow the scatter's moveset / opponent-IV / bait dropdowns or the opponent filter.

How this works

Per shield scenario: an opponent is contested when between 2% and 98% of this dive's IV spreads beat it (everyone else is settled and can't distinguish IVs). Each IV's fingerprint is its win/loss vector over those opponents; fingerprints are clustered bottom-up (agglomerative, Hamming distance, average linkage). The number of clusters, K, is chosen by silhouette -- a 0-to-1 score of how cleanly the fingerprints separate, where above about 0.5 the clusters are distinct groups and below 0.30 the headline says "weak separation" and the clusters are tendencies rather than tiers -- under a parsimony floor (a split must keep every cluster above a minimum size, and the smallest K in 2-6 within 0.03 of the best silhouette wins). Silhouettes are comparable between the scenarios on this page, not between species. Clusters are ordered weakest to strongest by mean contested wins. The scatter panels project the same 4,096 IV spreads onto each pair of battle stats; clusters that overlap completely in score separate cleanly there. A scenario is reported as degenerate (no clustering attempted) when it has fewer than 6 contested opponents or fewer than 8 distinct win patterns -- on that little data every candidate K scores near-perfectly, which is a measurement artifact and not structure -- and its bits are left out of the all scenarios fingerprint. A scenario that clears the floor but has no split keeping every cluster above the minimum size is reported as fragmented instead, and its bits still count toward the combined view. The all scenarios bits are ordered most-discriminating first, which is the tie-break the linkage uses when several merges are equally close. Replaces the retired score-gap cluster heuristic (2026-07), which usually (~77% of sampled runs) fired on float-level jitter in the opponent-averaged score, and even when it did catch a real tier could not name which matchups defined it.

Evidence

1. Header

Deoxys (Defense) -- Ultra League

LOW_KICK / PSYCHO_BOOST, THUNDERBOLT (arm 1 of 5)

Level view: L50. Bake 2026-09-27. Blob 20260927_133542_Deoxys_Defense_ultra.replay.pkl.gz.

Opponent pool: 63 entries (Custom pool from ul_top60.txt (60 mons)). Grid: 4096 IV spreads x 9 shield scenarios.

Opponent-IV settings baked: PvPoke-default opponent IVs; PvPoke-default opponent IVs, focal never baits; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits.

Rankings snapshot 2026-09-27.

2. Floor

15 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

15 single-stat values do separate a cell exactly (14 on attack, 1 on Def, 0 on HP, over 111 contested cells), but none of them clears every gate while splitting between 25% and 60% of the grid, which is what an exact line has to do to carry a floor label.

The closest dirty thresholds on this dive, printed as evidence and not as lines:

At the one decimal place PvPoke and Poke Genie display, the top row reads Atk >= 127.7, which selects 2048 spreads where the exact value selects 2048: 0 more spreads land inside a line printed that way. The table prints the exact value because it is the one that selects the set the counts beside it describe.

A split is listed only when it puts fewer spreads on the wrong side than the constant rule does (predict one outcome for the whole grid) and when it keeps between 10% and 90% of the grid on each side.

cell	rank	closest split	spreads on the wrong side	constant rule gets wrong	wins at/above	wins below
1v0 Steelix (Shadow)	rank 47	Atk >= 127.72	112	1936	1936 of 2048	0 of 2048
0v0 Corviknight	rank 2	Atk >= 127.72	294	1754	2048 of 2048	294 of 2048
2v2 Corviknight (Shadow)	rank 4	HP >= 120	240	1648	2384 of 2560	64 of 1536
1v0 Moltres (Galarian)	rank 13	HP >= 119	112	1392	2704 of 2816	0 of 1280

3. Lines on the other stats

No axis carries a line on this arm, so there is nothing to compare across them.

4. Example spreads

Existence proofs; each selection rule is printed with its spread.

There is no line on this arm, so the rules run over the whole grid rather than over a set of clearers.

No spread on this grid wins more matchups than rank-1 does, so the whole IV decision here is zero matchups wide.

rule	IVs	level	Atk / Def / HP	stat product	contested cells	all cells
most cells won on the whole grid	12/13/15	L49.5	130.70 / 287.37 / 127	100.00% (#1)	93	221
bulkiest (max Def x HP) among the whole grid with SP >= 95%	3/15/15	L50.0	123.52 / 289.90 / 127	95.35% (#814)	72	200

Cells won by shield scenario

spread	0v0	0v1	1v0	1v1	1v2	2v0	2v1	2v2	total
rank-1 12/13/15	32	7	43	23	2	54	39	21	221
12/13/15	32	7	43	23	2	54	39	21	221
3/15/15	30	6	41	19	1	52	35	16	200

5. Rank-1 check

Stat-product rank-1 is 12/13/15 at L49.5: 130.70 attack / 287.37 Def / 127 HP. It wins 221 of 567 cells (93 of the 111 contested ones).

There is no floor on this arm, so there is no line for it to be on one side of.

The lowest material rung it misses is 131.08 (1v0 Cresselia).

It is a member of the Alternative target below.

6. Alternative target

Def >= 285.59, HP >= 116: 1308 spreads (31.9%), stat product 84.1% to 100.0% of rank-1, attack 121.00-133.61.

There is no line on this arm, so there is nothing for the rectangle to be disjoint from. Rule: among (Def, HP) rectangles with at least 100 members, the one winning the most contested cells with EVERY member that at most 1% of the spreads outside it win, counting only cells against a top-50 opponent in a non-degenerate scenario; ties broken by member count. The printed cuts are the least attained values among the members.

Wins 1 contested cell that way: 1v0 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46).

181 of the 216 spreads a raid, research or trade encounter can produce (83.8%) are inside it.

Encounters, whatever the source (this species has no wild spawn) needed to land inside this rectangle: 1 for a 50% chance, 1 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the 216 spreads those sources can produce (181 of them qualify), because a raid, research or trade encounter has a 10/10/10 IV floor, so the count is taken over the spreads those sources can actually produce and not over the whole grid.

Members win 151-221 cells in total.

IV envelope of the members -- attack IV 0-15, Def IV 10-15, HP IV 2-15. Members per attack IV: 0: 84, 1: 84, 2: 84, 3: 84, 4: 84, 5: 84, 6: 84, 7: 84, 8: 84, 9: 84, 10: 84, 11: 84, 12: 83, 13: 80, 14: 73, 15: 64.

Highest stat product inside it: 12/13/15 at L49.5 (100.00% of rank-1), 11/13/15 at L50.0 (99.95% of rank-1), 11/15/15 at L49.5 (99.94% of rank-1), 10/15/15 at L50.0 (99.89% of rank-1), 13/15/14 at L49.0 (99.83% of rank-1).

7. Cost

This test finds no reverse single-stat clean cut: no cell on this dive is won by every LOW spread and lost by every high one.

8. Rungs above

No floor on this arm, so no ladder above one.

9. Material clean cuts

Clean cuts holding between 10% and 90% of the grid, ascending. The widest of them sit under nearly every spread on the grid; the narrow ones at the bottom of the table do not.

cut	cells owned	spreads	settings	mechanism
Atk >= 123.52	2v0 Rillaboom (rank 21)	3328 (81.2%)	3/4	Mechanism: PSYCHO_BOOST damage steps 64 -> 65 across the cut.
Atk >= 125.20	2v1 Ampharos (rank 52)	2816 (68.8%)	1/4	Mechanism: PSYCHO_BOOST damage steps 60 -> 61 across the cut.
Atk >= 126.04	1v0 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 54)	2560 (62.5%)	2/4	Mechanism: THUNDERBOLT damage steps 59 -> 60 across the cut.
Atk >= 127.72	2v2 Empoleon (rank 8)	2048 (50.0%)	2/4	Mechanism: PSYCHO_BOOST damage steps 35 -> 36 across the cut.
Atk >= 130.24	2v1 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 54)	1278 (31.2%)	2/4	Mechanism: THUNDERBOLT damage steps 61 -> 62 across the cut.
Atk >= 131.08	1v0 Cresselia (rank 35)	1009 (24.6%)	2/4	Mechanism: THUNDERBOLT damage steps 37 -> 38 across the cut.
Atk >= 131.92	0v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23), 1v0 Regidrago (rank 33)	719 (17.6%)	2/4	0v1 Lapras (Shadow): Mechanism: PSYCHO_BOOST damage steps 70 -> 71 across the cut. 1v0 Regidrago: Mechanism unattributed: no priority line, damage step or bulkpoint sits in the gap.
Atk >= 132.37	0v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14), 1v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14)	465 (11.4%)	2-4 of 4	Mechanism: LOW_KICK damage steps 4 -> 5 across the cut.
Atk >= 132.76	1v1 Cradily (Shadow) (rank 53)	422 (10.3%)	2/4	Mechanism: PSYCHO_BOOST damage steps 48 -> 49 across the cut at focal Atk stage -1.

10. Bulk

Clean cuts by axis: 14 on attack, 1 on Def, 0 on HP.

11. Coverage

Omitted: there is no floor on this arm, so there is no line to place.

12. Mirror

Against the pool's own Deoxys (Defense) entry. Seat: our side is the optimised row; the mirror opponent always baits.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 0 0 0 3427 433 0 4096 4096 451.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 0 0 0 3427 433 0 4096 4096 451.

shields	win rate over the whole grid
0v0	4.4%
0v1	0.0%
0v2	0.0%
1v0	84.0%
1v1	7.6%
1v2	0.0%
2v0	100.0%
2v1	100.0%
2v2	11.7%

13. Changes the score, not the matchup

Cells won (or lost) by every spread where the battle score still steps by at least 60 at one attainable attack value.

Ordered by how close the step comes to the win line (500), nearest first: the question this field answers is how close a cell is to becoming a matchup, not how large the swing inside it is.

12 of 23 steps are listed, closest to the win line first; 11 more are not.

value	cell	rank	score step	points from 500	outcome
Atk >= 127.72	1v1 Steelix (Shadow)	rank 47	358 -> 469	31 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 123.52	1v0 Cramorant	rank 18	575 -> 669	75 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 130.24	2v0 Mimikyu	rank 10	418 -> 277	82 (widening)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 126.88	0v0 Clefable	rank 37	321 -> 418	82 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 131.08	2v0 Cresselia	rank 35	582 -> 647	82 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 122.68	1v2 Talonflame (Shadow)	rank 56	395 -> 142	105 (widening)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 127.72	1v2 Steelix (Shadow)	rank 47	306 -> 389	111 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 132.37	1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow)	rank 14	614 -> 800	114 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 121.84	0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow)	rank 27	205 -> 386	114 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 126.04	2v2 Annihilape	rank 59	378 -> 232	122 (widening)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 126.04	2v2 Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	rank 59	378 -> 232	122 (widening)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 133.60	2v0 Tinkaton	rank 1	637 -> 826	137 (widening)	won on both sides

14. Not claimed

96 of 111 contested matchups have no clean single-stat rule and are not claimed.

6 of 78 top-50 matchups are listed, one per base species and closest to an even split first; 72 more are not.

cell	rank	win rate over the whole grid
1v0 Steelix (Shadow)	rank 47	47.3%
1v2 Lapras (Shadow)	rank 23	57.0%
0v0 Corviknight	rank 2	57.2%
1v0 Rillaboom	rank 21	58.0%
2v1 Feraligatr (Shadow)	rank 14	59.8%
1v1 Toucannon	rank 49	60.1%

15. How sure

14 clean attack cuts, 1 on Def, 0 on HP, over 111 contested cells (128 cells are won by every spread, 328 lost by every spread).

Scenarios barred from carrying a floor -- fewer than 6 contested cells, or fewer than 8 distinct opponent columns among them; the dive page's "degenerate" flag applies the same two numbers to its own stricter counts, so it can flag a different set: 0v2 (0 contested, 1 distinct opponent columns), 1v2 (2 contested, 3 distinct opponent columns).

Not measured here: opponent IVs outside the baked cohorts, post-match HP and shields, XL or dust cost, and any live-game check of the priority convention.

16. Provenance

Every threshold in this section is one of three things, and each is badged where it is printed. An EXACT clean cut: every spread at or above it wins the named cell and no spread below it does. A ONE-SIDED GATE: one side is pure and the other is at least 97% pure -- either nothing below it wins (clearing it is necessary) or everything at or above it wins (clearing it is sufficient). A NEAR-EXACT split: at most 0.5% of the grid sits on the wrong side of it in total. The win predicate is gopvpsim.battle.is_win (score > 500; 500 itself is a tie, not a win).

That is stricter than the two numbers the dive page prints for the same opponent: the Threats "flips at" boundary (a 75/25 gate, so spreads on the passing side can still lose) and the Matchup clusters flip table's single-stat split for that one opponent (the most accurate such split, misclassifications allowed). The cluster line in "How sure" above is a third thing again: not one opponent but the stat rule that reproduces that section's "all scenarios" partition of the whole grid.

Priority ties: the coverage ladder counts an exact attack tie as NOT beaten. The engine is seat-dependent on an exact tie, so a tied line is not a guarantee in either direction.

Ranks and opponent builds are read live from the 2026-09-27 rankings snapshot and the current gamemaster; this blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so the render is a function of the blob plus those two live reads.

Auto-derived: this section is generated by scripts/deep_dive_brief.py from the replay blob. No human prose is in it.

How the line was selected (gates and guards)

Decision band for the floor (D1): the lowest ELIGIBLE rung whose clearer pool sits inside [25%, 60%] of the grid. Materiality band for a rung: [10%, 90%].

To be ELIGIBLE AS THE FLOOR -- not to be listed as a rung -- a cut needs at least 20 attack/20 defense/5 HP distinct attainable values below it, an opponent of rank 50 or better outside the caveat list, a non-degenerate shield scenario, a win rate at or above the cut of at least 90% in every setting, and a closed-form mechanism. Listing is a weaker bar: a rung is printed when it keeps 25% of the grid (above the floor) or sits in the materiality band (below it) AND points the same way in at least 2 settings, so a listed rung may be unattributed, low-ranked or 2-of-4.

A cut can fail several gates at once, so the failure tally below sums to more than the number of cuts.

Co-gate sub-rectangles need 5% of the grid; the alternative target needs 100 members; a score-only step needs 60 points. These constants are calibrated on one species and are parameters of the stage that uses them, not tuned per dive.

Floor pool by primitive on the attack axis -- the axis the cross-stat rule selected -- each selected on its own under the same band and the same gates: exact -> Atk >= 127.72 (2v2 Empoleon, 50.0%) rejected on G-material-gap (2 of 4 settings); one-sided gate -> no candidate in the band; near-exact -> no candidate in the band. Selected: no floor. Selection takes the lowest eligible rung in the band; a stronger primitive within 0.50 stat points of it wins the tie, in the order exact, one-sided gate, near-exact. A gate needs 97% of its dirty side pointing the right way; a near-exact split needs at most 0.5% of the grid on the wrong side. Only exact rungs merge, in either direction.

Degradation ladder: rung reached = c. 15 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

Of 15 clean cuts, 1 clears every gate. Gate failures: G-direction 12, G-material-gap 7, G-rank 4, G-material-lo 2, G-attributed 1, G-material-hi 1.

Of 30 one-sided gate and near-exact candidates, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-material-gap 27, G-material-hi 26, G-attributed 26, G-direction 16, G-rank 4, G-material-lo 2.

Closest dirty thresholds on cells with no clean rule: 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) Atk >= 127.72 (112 spreads on the wrong side); 0v0 Corviknight Atk >= 127.72 (294 spreads on the wrong side); 2v2 Corviknight (Shadow) HP >= 120 (240 spreads on the wrong side); 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) HP >= 119 (112 spreads on the wrong side).

band	attack line it selects	cell
[25%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 55%]	no floor	-
[25%, 50%]	no floor	-
[20%, 60%]	no floor	-
[30%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 70%]	no floor	-

Terms used here

build criteria: Which shield scenarios the ranking counts: all nine equally, the three even ones, or 1v1 alone.
build: A region of the IV grid you can aim at -- every spread that clears the same combination of thresholds, at least fifty of them.
stat-product rank-1 (SP1): The IV spread with the largest attack x defense x HP at this league's CP cap -- the bulk-first spread most IV tools list first. Written SP1 where it is named repeatedly.
guaranteed: Won by every single spread in the region, not by most of them.
decision matchup: A (shield scenario, opponent) pair the IV choice decides: a top-50 opponent that some spreads on this grid beat and others lose to.
wide: The looser rule drawn around a region of the grid: it holds every spread that region holds and more, so it wins less for every member but is easier to hit.
material: A matchup no single-stat threshold of a hundred or more spreads wins more than 95% of the time, so it takes two stats at once to claim it.
opponent-IV mode: One of the ways every opponent was made for this bake -- PvPoke-default IVs or the bulkiest ones, each with and without the focal side baiting -- so a claim that holds in all of them does not depend on how the opponent was made.
stat product: Attack x defense x HP at the league's CP cap, the usual one-number summary of an IV spread.
staircase: A rule whose defense floor steps DOWN as HP goes up, so bulk can be spent on either stat: one floor per HP value rather than one floor for all of them.
fork: A second region with no spread in common with the first that wins a noticeably different set of matchups outright -- the two overlap on less than 80% of them -- so they are a real choice rather than two spellings of one.
outside rate: How often the spreads left OUT of a region win the same matchup its own members all win -- one the rest of the grid takes anyway is not what you bought.
charge-move priority (CMP): When both sides throw a charged move on the same turn, the higher attack stat goes first.
contested matchups: The matchups some IV spreads on this grid win and others lose -- the only ones an IV choice can change.
UpSet plot: A bar chart of set intersections: each column is one candidate region, and the dots under it mark which named sets it lies inside (Lex et al. 2014).
bulkpoint: A defense value across which an opponent's damage into you steps down by a whole point, or an HP value across which the number of hits they need to knock you out changes.
one-sided gate: A stat value with one clean side: either nothing below it wins the matchup, or everything at or above it does -- so clearing it is required, or enough, but not both.
rung: An attack value above the line at which some further matchup flips for every spread that reaches it.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 130.00 and Def >= 285.00 and HP >= 124	168	45 of 77, 5 of them material; 31 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (outside 16%)	14: 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan), 0v0 Blastoise, +12 more	10/9/15 (224 of 567 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (45 of 77), its 168 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (7) 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 38%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 44% 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 66% 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 82% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 36%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 80%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 85% 1v0 (9) 1v0 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 42%; material 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 52%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 67% 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 72% 1v1 (6) 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 63% 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 75%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 76% 1v2 (2) 1v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 62% 2v0 (6) 2v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 25% 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 28% 2v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 39%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 84% 2v1 (3) 2v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 16%; material 2v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 23%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 68%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (9) 2v2 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 20%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 37%; material 2v2 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 42% 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (168), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 130.00 and HP >= 124	506	39 of 77, 2 of them material; 26 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	20: 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan), 0v0 Blastoise, +18 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 100% of the same spreads (2 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 168 spreads in 506 of its own, and keeps 39 of Build 1's 45 guaranteed matchups (2 of them material). The 6 it gives up out here: 2v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (grid 19%), 1v2 Snorlax (grid 33%) and 0v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 39%), and 3 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 288.24 and HP >= 128 (bulk box)	51	44 of 77, 10 of them material; 32 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Cramorant (outside 3%)	15: 0v0 Forretress (Shadow), 0v1 Snorlax (Shadow), +13 more	9/14/15 (228 of 567 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (44 of 77), its 51 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (9) 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 21%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 23% 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 36%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 46% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 16% 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 81%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (7) 1v0 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 44%; material 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 73% 1v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 77% 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 82% 1v1 (9) 1v1 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 10% 1v1 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 10%; material 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 20% 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 40% 1v2 (2) 1v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 3%; material 1v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 63% 2v0 (3) 2v0 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 26%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 84% 2v0 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 85% 2v1 (2) 2v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 18%; material 2v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 69% 2v2 (10) 2v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 6%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 10%; material 2v2 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 33%; material 2v2 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 39%; material Members (51), highest stat product first

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 130.00 and Def >= 285.00 and HP >= 124	168	22 of 40 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 45 of 77 overall, 5 of them material; 31 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (outside 16%)	14: 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan), 0v0 Blastoise, +12 more	11/9/15 (77 of 189 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (22 of 40 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 45 of 77 overall), its 168 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (7) 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 38%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 44% 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 66% 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 82% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 36%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 80%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 85% 1v0 (9) 1v0 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 42%; material 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 52%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 67% 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 72% 1v1 (6) 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 63% 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 75%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 76% 1v2 (2) 1v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 62% 2v0 (6) 2v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 25% 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 28% 2v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 39%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 84% 2v1 (3) 2v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 16%; material 2v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 23%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 68%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (9) 2v2 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 20%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 37%; material 2v2 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 42% 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (168), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 130.00 and HP >= 124	506	20 of 40 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 39 of 77 overall, 2 of them material; 26 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	20: 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan), 0v0 Blastoise, +18 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 100% of the same spreads (2 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 168 spreads in 506 of its own, and keeps 20 of Build 1's 22 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (39 of its 45 overall, 2 of them material). The 6 it gives up out here: 2v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (grid 19%), 1v2 Snorlax (grid 33%) and 0v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 39%), and 3 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 288.24 and HP >= 128 (bulk box)	51	28 of 40 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 44 of 77 overall, 10 of them material; 32 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Cramorant (outside 3%)	15: 0v0 Forretress (Shadow), 0v1 Snorlax (Shadow), +13 more	8/14/15 (78 of 189 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (28 of 40 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 44 of 77 overall), its 51 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (9) 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 21%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 23% 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 36%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 46% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 16% 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 81%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (7) 1v0 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 44%; material 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 73% 1v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 77% 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 82% 1v1 (9) 1v1 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 10% 1v1 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 10%; material 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 20% 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 40% 1v2 (2) 1v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 3%; material 1v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 63% 2v0 (3) 2v0 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 26%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 84% 2v0 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 85% 2v1 (2) 2v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 18%; material 2v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 69% 2v2 (10) 2v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 6%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 10%; material 2v2 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 33%; material 2v2 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 39%; material Members (51), highest stat product first

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	~ Atk >= 127.00 and Def >= 287.00 and HP >= 118	621	7 of 12 in 1v1 shields; 27 of 77 overall, 1 of them material; 15 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Dondozo (outside 30%)	nothing the other builds guarantee	8/14/14 (25 of 63 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 1 guarantees (7 of 12 in 1v1 shields; 27 of 77 overall), its 621 members The rule covers 97% of the same spreads (0 extra, 21 missed); the member list is the build. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 61%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 80% 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 81% 0v0 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 81% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 77%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 83% 1v0 (8) 1v0 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 35%; material 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 46%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 63%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 73% 1v1 (7) 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 30% 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 58%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 72%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 73% 2v0 (1) 2v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 85% 2v2 (4) 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 80% Members (621), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 127.00 and HP >= 118	1872	4 of 12 in 1v1 shields; 16 of 77 overall, 0 of them material; 5 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	11: 0v0 Melmetal, 0v0 Feraligatr, +9 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 621 spreads in 1872 of its own, and keeps 4 of Build 1's 7 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (16 of its 27 overall, none of them material). The 11 it gives up out here: 1v1 Dondozo (grid 40%), 1v0 Cresselia (Shadow) (grid 45%) and 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (grid 76%), and 8 more.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	817	127.9	283.9	116	#1283-#4096	5.0	-
C1	3279	128.0	285.4	123	#1-#3937	11.7	Melmetal (+82pp), Feraligatr (+79pp), Shadow Ampharos (+75pp), Shadow Corviknight (+58pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Corviknight	0%	58%
Seismitoad	0%	55%
Primarina	8%	51%
Shadow Ampharos	0%	75%
Shadow Forretress	40%	40%
Blastoise	3%	45%
Corviknight	56%	70%
Toucannon	0%	29%
Alolan Ninetales	0%	27%
Miltank	42%	90%
Melmetal	17%	100%
Shadow Feraligatr	17%	16%
Dondozo	38%	95%
Feraligatr	20%	100%
Shadow Cradily	0%	14%
Deoxys (Defense)	10%	10%
Cramorant	84%	94%
Annihilape	85%	100%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	85%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Corviknight	46%	wins iff hp >= 123	92%	named
Seismitoad	44%	wins iff atk >= 127.64	87%	named
Primarina	42%	wins iff hp >= 125	86%	named
Shadow Ampharos	60%	wins iff hp >= 121	92%	named
Shadow Forretress	40%	wins iff atk >= 130.18	90%	named
Blastoise	37%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	71%	named
Corviknight	67%	wins iff atk >= 127.64	89%	named
Toucannon	24%	wins iff hp >= 125	90%	named
Alolan Ninetales	22%	wins iff atk >= 132.71	86%	named
Miltank	80%	wins iff hp >= 116	84%	named
Melmetal	83%	wins iff hp >= 117	94%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	16%	wins iff atk >= 132.32	100%	named
Dondozo	84%	wins iff sp >= 4,138,485	88%	named
Feraligatr	84%	wins iff hp >= 117	96%	named
Shadow Cradily	12%	wins iff hp >= 127	94%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	10%	wins iff atk >= 133.16	99%	named
Cramorant	92%	wins iff atk >= 123.41	95%	named
Annihilape	97%	wins iff sp >= 4,052,153	98%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	97%	wins iff sp >= 4,052,153	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3724	127.8	284.9	121	#82-#4096	2.9	-
C1	372	129.5	286.6	126	#1-#1321	5.9	Shadow Empoleon (+91pp), Shadow Snorlax (+67pp), Snorlax (+62pp), Shadow Talonflame (+38pp); trades away Shadow Lapras (-19pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Talonflame	52%	91%
Shadow Snorlax	33%	100%
Shadow Lapras	24%	5%
Virizion	79%	100%
Shadow Empoleon	9%	100%
Cramorant	84%	100%
Shadow Walrein	4%	30%
Snorlax	0%	62%
Miltank	5%	0%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Talonflame	56%	wins iff atk >= 127.64	100%	named
Shadow Snorlax	39%	wins iff hp >= 122	89%	named
Shadow Lapras	23%	wins iff atk >= 131.87	100%	named
Virizion	81%	wins iff sp >= 4,160,618	84%	named
Shadow Empoleon	17%	wins iff hp >= 126	92%	named
Cramorant	85%	wins iff atk >= 123.41	98%	named
Shadow Walrein	6%	wins iff sp >= 4,754,582	94%	named
Snorlax	6%	wins iff sp >= 4,724,740	96%	named
Miltank	4%	wins iff def < 278.14	96%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	712	128.1	284.1	116	#1283-#4096	7.0	-
C1	3384	127.9	285.3	123	#1-#4020	10.7	Registeel (+99pp), Ampharos (+99pp), Galarian Moltres (+89pp), Florges (+79pp); trades away Alolan Ninetales (-46pp), Clefable (-32pp)

Moveset: Switching movesets reloads the page; pasted CSV will need to be re-loaded. Shields: Build criteria: Opponent IVs: Bait: Y-axis: Color: Anchors: Build criteria weights shield scenarios in: Which one to build?, the all-scenarios clusters, and Shields = All (by build criteria). Nothing else on this page is re-weighted by it. Threshold tiers (e.g. GH Great / GH Good) are expert stat-cutoff regions defined in Threshold Tiers below. Hover legend to isolate; click to lock.

Check my collection - Your collection stays in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Paste your Poke Genie CSV export below, or click Choose file… to load one from disk. You’ll see which of your Deoxys (Defense)s (and pre-evolutions) qualify for each tier, overlaid on the scatter plot.

Show only my mons

Or enter one at a time - Atk/Def/HP IVs (0-15), level, shadow flag. Same format as PvPoke / PvPIVs.

Species Atk Def HP Level Shadow

Compare candidates - up to 7 of your IV spreads, side by side: wins, mirror, and the close calls that decide the build

Add a spread: Atk Def HP 0 / 7 added

Highlight IVs:

Top IVs Rows: Ranked by this dive's battle simulation (not fetched from PvPoke). Click any column header to sort.

Battle-Rating Distribution

Per-matchup battle-rating distribution for the reference IV (PvPoke default or Rank 1, matching the Opponent-IVs dropdown) across the opponent pool, under the currently-selected Shields / Opponent-IVs / Bait.

Low Kick / Psycho Boost, Thunderbolt

IV Recommendations

Moveset: Low Kick / Psycho Boost, Thunderbolt. Vs PvPoke default opponents.

IV Flavor Guide (Simulation)

Auto-generated from simulation matchup data. Flavor names (e.g. "Premium Bulk", "Fortified {Opp}", "{Opp} Slayer") are derived from which opponents each IV cluster beats, not from the expert-authored Threshold Tiers section above. This IV Flavor Guide and the Threshold Tiers answer different questions and may not line up 1:1. New to flavor cards? The IV Flavor Guide walks through the six name families and the trade-off layout.

In Ultra League, Deoxys (Defense) has 3 flavors: General Good, Tinkaton Slayer, and Deoxys (Defense) Mirror Atk. In general, the General Good variation may be the flavor of choice, as it plays up Deoxys (Defense)'s potential vs Corviknight (Shadow), Dondozo, Florges, among others.

Flavor	IVs	%	Catches needed
General Good [Recommended]	3357	82.0%	almost any will do
Tinkaton Slayer	105	2.6%	~27-54 for a 50-75% chance
Deoxys (Defense) Mirror Atk	197	4.8%	~15-29 for a 50-75% chance

General Good (121.15 Atk, 276.50 Def, 116 HP) [Recommended]

276.50 Def and 116 HP is a safe baseline for Deoxys (Defense), with an attack floor of 121.15 Atk for coverage against key opponents.

116 HP is also a safe spot, helping secure the mirror and key matchups vs Ampharos, Blastoise.

276.48 Def with 116+ HP for Ampharos (incl. Shadow) (0v0, 1v0), Corviknight (incl. Shadow) (0v0, 2v2), Cramorant (2v2), Dondozo (0v0), Feraligatr (incl. Shadow) (0v0, 2v1), Florges (1v0), Lapras (incl. Shadow) (1v2), Melmetal (0v0), Miltank (0v0), Moltres (Galarian) (1v0), Ninetales (1v1), Registeel (1v0), Snorlax (incl. Shadow) (0v1, 1v1), Walrein (2v2), Cresselia (incl. Shadow) (1v0, 2v1), Jellicent (2v0), Primarina (0v0), Virizion (1v1, 2v2)
277.31 Def with 120+ HP for the Ninetales (Alolan) (incl. Shadow) (2v1 no bait)
279.83 Def with 123+ HP for the Primarina (0v0)
282.30 Def with 120+ HP for the Ninetales (Alolan) (incl. Shadow) (2v1 no bait)
283.13 Def with 119+ HP for the Virizion (1v1, 2v2)
283.94 Def with 123+ HP for the Miltank (1v1 no bait)
284.00 Def for the Dondozo (1v1)
284.76 Def with 120+ HP for Miltank (1v1), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (2v0)

Tinkaton Slayer (133.36 Atk, 118 HP)

The "Tinkaton Slayer" Deoxys (Defense) trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Tinkaton 1v0, the Ampharos (Shadow) 2v1, the Clefable 1v0. Deoxys (Defense) would need 133.36 Atk while maintaining 118 HP.

Deoxys (Defense) Mirror Atk (133.03 Atk, 115 HP)

The "Deoxys (Defense) Mirror Atk" Deoxys (Defense) trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Ampharos (Shadow) 2v1, the Clefable 1v0, the Corviknight 0v0, 2v2. Deoxys (Defense) would need 133.03 Atk while maintaining 115 HP.

Rank-1 Deoxys (Defense) (12/13/15) meets the General Good thresholds.

Simulation-Derived IV Tiers

Auto-derived from the sim (not expert-authored).

Threshold Tiers

Stat-target headlines from thresholds/*.toml, each grouped with the named anchors its spec clears and the IV spreads that meet it. Within each tier card, bullets are grouped by opponent and sorted by the required stat (Def or Atk) ascending - read top-to-bottom in the order a player would clear them as their stat grows. The flat list of every anchor (regardless of tier) lives in Anchor-Driven Matchup Flips below. New to tier cards? The Threshold Tiers guide walks through what the stat cutoffs and member counts mean. A tier's anchors come from two passes over the anchor list:

Primary bullets - the tier has a cutoff on the anchor's target axis (atk or def) that meets or exceeds the anchor's threshold. Consequences:
- Subset case: if tier A is strictly stricter than tier B on the anchor axis, A's bullet list is a superset of B's. Overlap is intentional.
- Crossed-cutoff case: tier A has only an atk cutoff, tier B has only a def cutoff - neither is a subset of the other. Atk anchors appear only on A; def anchors only on B.
- Slayer-axis IV-count case: two tiers can list the same atk anchor but have different member-IV counts because a stricter tier's def cutoff excludes def-sacrificing spreads that the looser tier keeps. Check the (−N vs parent) callout on the tier header to spot this at a glance.
Anchors we get for free (collapsed) - the tier has no cutoff on the anchor's target axis, but every IV in the tier clears the anchor's threshold anyway. These would be silently dropped by the primary filter; we surface them in a separate collapsed block so the card isn't misleading.

Tinkaton Slayer · atk≥133.36, hp≥118 (105 IV spreads) (−92 vs Deoxys (Defense) Mirror Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 65 anchors across 7 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Blastoise, Clefable, +27 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Tinkaton (1 scenario flip).

133.36 Atk for Tinkaton (Thunderbolt) vs Tinkaton (1v0)
125.33 Atk for Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
127.19 Atk for Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
130.78 Atk for Corviknight (Low Kick) vs Corviknight (2v2)
132.97 Atk for Melmetal (Low Kick) vs Melmetal (2v2)
128.52 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Psycho Boost) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
129.26 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Thunderbolt) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
122.36 Atk for Empoleon (Thunderbolt) vs Empoleon (0v1, 2v2)
127.29 Atk for Empoleon (Psycho Boost) vs Empoleon (2v2)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Low Kick) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
121.82 Atk for Cramorant (Psycho Boost) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.85 Atk for Cramorant (Thunderbolt) vs Cramorant (0v1)
122.73 Atk for Cramorant (Low Kick) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.15 Atk for Rillaboom (Psycho Boost) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
122.05 Atk for Rillaboom (Thunderbolt) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
131.84 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.07 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Low Kick) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Thunderbolt) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
122.06 Atk for Dondozo (Thunderbolt) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v2)
124.93 Atk for Dondozo (Psycho Boost) vs Dondozo (2v2)
121.63 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Low Kick) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
122.97 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
123.53 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
129.25 Atk for Regidrago (Thunderbolt) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Psycho Boost) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Low Kick) vs Regidrago (1v0 no bait)
123.97 Atk for Cresselia (Thunderbolt) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
125.01 Atk for Cresselia (Psycho Boost) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
129.90 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
132.60 Atk for Walrein (Thunderbolt) vs Walrein (1v1)
123.17 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v0, 1v1)
132.16 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v1)
127.23 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Low Kick) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
129.33 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
130.29 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
125.29 Atk for Toucannon (Thunderbolt) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
126.07 Atk for Toucannon (Psycho Boost) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
127.96 Atk for Toucannon (Low Kick) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
122.67 Atk for Ampharos (Psycho Boost) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
124.41 Atk for Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
132.09 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
132.45 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
123.21 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
123.58 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
127.84 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Low Kick) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
125.69 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.91 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.87 Atk for Seismitoad (Psycho Boost) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
126.80 Atk for Seismitoad (Thunderbolt) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
121.32 Atk for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (1v1, 2v2)
127.93 Atk for Miltank (Psycho Boost) vs Miltank (1v1)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1 no bait)
132.72 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1 no bait)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
122.60 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
123.09 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
122.20 Atk for Blastoise (Thunderbolt) vs Blastoise (2v1)
123.23 Atk for Blastoise (Psycho Boost) vs Blastoise (2v1)
122.64 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)
123.36 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)
132.96 Atk for Clefable (Thunderbolt) vs Clefable (1v0)

Anchors we get for free (26 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

276.62 Def + 127 HP for Corviknight bulk (Payback) vs Corviknight (2v2)
276.90 Def + 127 HP for Corviknight bulk (Iron Head) vs Corviknight (2v2)
276.95 Def + 123 HP for Shadow Snorlax bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v1 with bait)
277.28 Def + 116 HP for Florges bulk (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v0)
277.28 Def + 116 HP for Galarian Moltres bulk (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (1v0)
276.68 Def + 118 HP for Shadow Feraligatr bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
277.17 Def + 118 HP for Shadow Feraligatr bulk (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
276.64 Def + 127 HP for Guzzlord bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (2v0)
276.64 Def + 118 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (1v2)
276.64 Def + 118 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (1v2)
277.26 Def + 118 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (1v2)
277.05 Def + 116 HP for Dondozo bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (0v0)
277.13 Def + 116 HP for Registeel bulk (Focus Blast) vs Registeel (1v0, 1v1)
277.24 Def + 116 HP for Registeel bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (1v0, 1v1)
276.64 Def + 117 HP for Walrein bulk (Earthquake) vs Walrein (1v1, 2v2)
276.74 Def + 127 HP for Seaking bulk (Megahorn) vs Seaking (2v2)
276.74 Def + 127 HP for Seaking bulk (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (2v2)
276.63 Def + 127 HP for Toucannon bulk (Drill Peck) vs Toucannon (0v0)
276.63 Def + 127 HP for Toucannon bulk (Peck) vs Toucannon (0v0)
276.63 Def + 127 HP for Toucannon bulk (Beak Blast) vs Toucannon (0v0)
276.71 Def + 116 HP for Ampharos bulk (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (1v0)
277.16 Def + 116 HP for Ampharos bulk (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (1v0)
276.71 Def + 119 HP for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
276.97 Def + 119 HP for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
276.51 Def + 116 HP for Miltank bulk (High Horsepower) vs Miltank (0v0, 1v1)
276.50 Def + 119 HP for Snorlax bulk (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (1v1 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

121.84 Atk + 117 HP flips Feraligatr (0v0) [3120 IVs]
121.84 Atk + 117 HP flips Florges (1v0) [3120 IVs]
121.84 Atk + 116 HP flips Galarian Moltres (1v0) [3360 IVs]
121.84 Atk + 116 HP flips Ninetales (1v1) [3360 IVs]
121.84 Atk + 117 HP flips Registeel (1v0) [3120 IVs]
121.84 Atk + 116 HP flips Florges (1v0) [3360 IVs]
121.84 Atk + 118 HP flips Virizion (2v2 with bait) [2880 IVs]

Member IVs (105)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/0/13 👑	133.61	277.30	126	#71	+3	-13.3	-1.0	-2.4
15/3/12 👑	133.61	279.82	125	#74	+3	-11.4	-3.7	-0.6
15/2/12	133.61	278.98	125	#105	+3	-11.6	-5.1	-0.9
15/0/12	133.61	277.30	125	#128	+1	-16.5	-3.0	-1.8
15/1/12	133.61	278.14	125	#134	+3	-12.3	-5.8	-1.1
15/14/7 👑	133.61	289.06	121	#151	+3	-12.3	-1.4	-7.6
15/13/7	133.61	288.22	121	#193	+2	-15.4	-1.9	-5.8
15/12/7	133.61	287.38	121	#200	+4	-15.7	-1.0	-6.0
15/12/8	133.61	287.38	121	#201	+4	-15.7	-1.0	-6.0
15/3/11	133.61	279.82	124	#251	+0	-16.8	-6.8	-1.9
15/5/11 👑	133.61	281.50	124	#260	-1	-15.6	-8.6	-2.9
15/4/11	133.61	280.66	124	#264	-1	-16.4	-9.0	-3.0
15/0/11	133.61	277.30	124	#270	-3	-18.6	-4.5	-3.2
15/2/11	133.61	278.98	124	#274	-1	-17.0	-6.9	-2.1
15/15/6 👑	133.61	289.90	120	#303	+1	-15.1	-2.9	-10.2
15/7/10 👑	133.61	283.18	123	#307	+0	-17.0	-10.2	-4.9
15/9/9 👑	133.61	284.86	122	#316	+3	-17.3	-6.5	-6.0
15/1/11	133.61	278.14	124	#319	-2	-18.1	-7.3	-2.6
15/11/7	133.61	286.54	121	#334	+1	-17.9	-3.4	-7.2
15/11/8	133.61	286.54	121	#335	+1	-17.9	-3.4	-7.2
15/10/7	133.61	285.70	121	#355	+1	-19.2	-3.5	-7.2
15/10/8	133.61	285.70	121	#356	+1	-19.2	-3.5	-7.2
15/15/5	133.61	289.90	119	#389	+1	-16.8	-6.6	-8.6
15/14/6	133.61	289.06	120	#400	+0	-19.6	-2.9	-10.7
15/6/10	133.61	282.34	123	#410	-1	-18.9	-10.5	-5.4
15/13/6	133.61	288.22	120	#414	-1	-20.1	-3.8	-8.9
15/8/9	133.61	284.02	122	#423	+0	-18.0	-7.6	-10.9
15/5/10	133.61	281.50	123	#432	-3	-19.3	-10.1	-5.8
15/3/10	133.61	279.82	123	#433	-2	-20.1	-9.0	-4.7
15/9/7	133.61	284.86	121	#442	+0	-21.5	-5.3	-6.7
15/9/8	133.61	284.86	121	#443	+0	-21.5	-5.3	-6.7
15/4/10	133.61	280.66	123	#447	-3	-19.6	-10.3	-5.9
15/0/10	133.61	277.30	123	#464	-5	-24.2	-6.7	-6.9
15/14/5	133.61	289.06	119	#469	+0	-21.4	-6.6	-8.8
15/2/10	133.61	278.98	123	#488	-3	-22.9	-9.1	-8.7
15/1/10	133.61	278.14	123	#494	-4	-23.7	-9.4	-6.3
15/12/6	133.61	287.38	120	#505	-1	-23.6	-2.9	-10.7
15/13/5	133.61	288.22	119	#517	-1	-21.8	-7.1	-10.8
15/8/7	133.61	284.02	121	#540	-4	-22.3	-8.0	-12.1
15/8/8	133.61	284.02	121	#541	-4	-22.3	-8.0	-12.1
15/7/9	133.61	283.18	122	#568	-4	-21.9	-10.4	-15.5
15/7/7	133.61	283.18	121	#601	-6	-23.6	-10.8	-12.4
15/7/8	133.61	283.18	121	#602	-6	-23.6	-10.8	-12.4
15/11/6	133.61	286.54	120	#607	-4	-24.8	-5.5	-12.0
15/6/9	133.61	282.34	122	#609	-4	-23.3	-10.8	-15.4
15/5/9	133.61	281.50	122	#637	-8	-23.7	-11.4	-16.4
15/10/6	133.61	285.70	120	#638	-4	-25.0	-7.2	-12.0
15/12/5	133.61	287.38	119	#644	-1	-26.6	-7.3	-13.0
15/6/7	133.61	282.34	121	#658	-6	-25.8	-11.3	-12.6
15/6/8	133.61	282.34	121	#659	-6	-25.8	-11.3	-12.6
… 55 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Deoxys (Defense) Mirror Atk · atk≥132.97, hp≥115 (197 IV spreads) (−225 vs Ninetales (Alolan) Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 64 anchors across 7 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Blastoise, Clefable, +26 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Melmetal (2 scenario flips).

125.33 Atk for Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
127.19 Atk for Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
130.78 Atk for Corviknight (Low Kick) vs Corviknight (2v2)
132.97 Atk for Melmetal (Low Kick) vs Melmetal (2v2)
128.52 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Psycho Boost) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
129.26 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Thunderbolt) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
122.36 Atk for Empoleon (Thunderbolt) vs Empoleon (0v1, 2v2)
127.29 Atk for Empoleon (Psycho Boost) vs Empoleon (2v2)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Low Kick) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
121.82 Atk for Cramorant (Psycho Boost) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.85 Atk for Cramorant (Thunderbolt) vs Cramorant (0v1)
122.73 Atk for Cramorant (Low Kick) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.15 Atk for Rillaboom (Psycho Boost) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
122.05 Atk for Rillaboom (Thunderbolt) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
131.84 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.07 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Low Kick) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Thunderbolt) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
122.06 Atk for Dondozo (Thunderbolt) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v2)
124.93 Atk for Dondozo (Psycho Boost) vs Dondozo (2v2)
121.63 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Low Kick) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
122.97 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
123.53 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
129.25 Atk for Regidrago (Thunderbolt) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Psycho Boost) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Low Kick) vs Regidrago (1v0 no bait)
123.97 Atk for Cresselia (Thunderbolt) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
125.01 Atk for Cresselia (Psycho Boost) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
129.90 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
132.60 Atk for Walrein (Thunderbolt) vs Walrein (1v1)
123.17 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v0)
132.16 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v1)
127.23 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Low Kick) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
129.33 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
130.29 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
125.29 Atk for Toucannon (Thunderbolt) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
126.07 Atk for Toucannon (Psycho Boost) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
127.96 Atk for Toucannon (Low Kick) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
122.67 Atk for Ampharos (Psycho Boost) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
124.41 Atk for Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
132.09 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
132.45 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
123.21 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
123.58 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
127.84 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Low Kick) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
125.69 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.91 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.87 Atk for Seismitoad (Psycho Boost) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
126.80 Atk for Seismitoad (Thunderbolt) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
121.32 Atk for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
127.93 Atk for Miltank (Psycho Boost) vs Miltank (1v1 with bait)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1 no bait)
132.72 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1 no bait)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
122.60 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
123.09 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
122.20 Atk for Blastoise (Thunderbolt) vs Blastoise (2v1)
123.23 Atk for Blastoise (Psycho Boost) vs Blastoise (2v1)
122.64 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)
123.36 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)
132.96 Atk for Clefable (Thunderbolt) vs Clefable (1v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

132.81 Atk flips Tinkaton (1v0) [223 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Tinkaton (1v0)

Member IVs (197)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/0/15 👑	133.21	276.47	127	#36	+4	-5.5	+0.9	-6.5
15/11/10 👑	133.21	285.69	123	#70	+8	-8.4	-5.9	+1.4
15/0/13 👑	133.61	277.30	126	#71	+3	-13.3	-1.0	-2.4
15/3/12 👑	133.61	279.82	125	#74	+3	-11.4	-3.7	-0.6
15/13/9 👑	133.21	287.37	122	#79	+8	-11.6	-4.0	+0.8
15/1/14	133.21	277.31	126	#89	+3	-13.5	-1.2	-2.4
15/2/14 👑	133.21	278.15	126	#93	+5	-9.4	-4.0	-1.8
15/4/13 👑	133.21	279.83	125	#100	+3	-11.7	-3.9	-0.7
15/2/12	133.61	278.98	125	#105	+3	-11.6	-5.1	-0.9
15/0/12	133.61	277.30	125	#128	+1	-16.5	-3.0	-1.8
15/1/12	133.61	278.14	125	#134	+3	-12.3	-5.8	-1.1
15/14/7 👑	133.61	289.06	121	#151	+3	-12.3	-1.4	-7.6
15/3/13	133.21	278.99	125	#157	+3	-11.9	-5.3	-0.9
15/0/14	133.21	276.47	126	#158	+2	-13.7	-0.7	-8.3
15/1/13	133.21	277.31	125	#177	+1	-16.7	-3.2	-1.8
15/2/13	133.21	278.15	125	#180	+3	-12.5	-6.1	-1.2
15/13/7	133.61	288.22	121	#193	+2	-15.4	-1.9	-5.8
15/15/8	133.21	289.04	121	#198	+3	-12.5	-1.6	-7.7
15/12/7	133.61	287.38	121	#200	+4	-15.7	-1.0	-6.0
15/12/8	133.61	287.38	121	#201	+4	-15.7	-1.0	-6.0
15/12/9	133.21	286.53	122	#202	+5	-13.8	-6.5	-0.7
15/3/11	133.61	279.82	124	#251	+0	-16.8	-6.8	-1.9
15/14/8	133.21	288.20	121	#252	+2	-15.7	-2.1	-5.9
15/13/8	133.21	287.37	121	#258	+4	-16.0	-1.2	-6.1
15/5/11 👑	133.61	281.50	124	#260	-1	-15.6	-8.6	-2.9
15/4/11	133.61	280.66	124	#264	-1	-16.4	-9.0	-3.0
15/11/9	133.21	285.69	122	#268	+5	-15.1	-6.7	-4.5
15/10/10	133.21	284.85	123	#269	+3	-14.9	-6.8	-4.3
15/0/11	133.61	277.30	124	#270	-3	-18.6	-4.5	-3.2
15/2/11	133.61	278.98	124	#274	-1	-17.0	-6.9	-2.1
15/7/12 👑	133.21	282.34	124	#278	+1	-15.5	-9.2	-2.4
15/9/10	133.21	284.01	123	#285	+2	-16.0	-7.0	-4.3
15/9/11	133.21	284.01	123	#286	+2	-16.0	-7.0	-4.3
15/4/12	133.21	279.83	124	#302	+0	-17.0	-7.0	-2.0
15/15/6 👑	133.61	289.90	120	#303	+1	-15.1	-2.9	-10.2
15/7/10 👑	133.61	283.18	123	#307	+0	-17.0	-10.2	-4.9
15/6/12	133.21	281.50	124	#311	-1	-15.9	-8.8	-2.9
15/5/12	133.21	280.66	124	#314	-1	-16.7	-9.3	-3.0
15/9/9 👑	133.61	284.86	122	#316	+3	-17.3	-6.5	-6.0
15/1/11	133.61	278.14	124	#319	-2	-18.1	-7.3	-2.6
15/11/7	133.61	286.54	121	#334	+1	-17.9	-3.4	-7.2
15/11/8	133.61	286.54	121	#335	+1	-17.9	-3.4	-7.2
15/8/10	133.21	283.18	123	#344	+0	-17.3	-10.4	-4.9
15/8/11	133.21	283.18	123	#345	+0	-17.3	-10.4	-4.9
15/10/7	133.61	285.70	121	#355	+1	-19.2	-3.5	-7.2
15/10/8	133.61	285.70	121	#356	+1	-19.2	-3.5	-7.2
15/15/5	133.61	289.90	119	#389	+1	-16.8	-6.6	-8.6
15/14/6	133.61	289.06	120	#400	+0	-19.6	-2.9	-10.7
15/6/10	133.61	282.34	123	#410	-1	-18.9	-10.5	-5.4
15/13/6	133.61	288.22	120	#414	-1	-20.1	-3.8	-8.9
… 147 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Clefable Atk · atk≥132.96 (197 IV spreads) (−225 vs Ninetales (Alolan) Atk (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 63 anchors across 7 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Blastoise, Clefable, +25 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Clefable (1 scenario flip).

125.33 Atk for Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
127.19 Atk for Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
130.78 Atk for Corviknight (Low Kick) vs Corviknight (2v2)
128.52 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Psycho Boost) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
129.26 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Thunderbolt) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
122.36 Atk for Empoleon (Thunderbolt) vs Empoleon (0v1, 2v2)
127.29 Atk for Empoleon (Psycho Boost) vs Empoleon (2v2)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Low Kick) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
121.82 Atk for Cramorant (Psycho Boost) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.85 Atk for Cramorant (Thunderbolt) vs Cramorant (0v1)
122.73 Atk for Cramorant (Low Kick) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.15 Atk for Rillaboom (Psycho Boost) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
122.05 Atk for Rillaboom (Thunderbolt) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
131.84 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.07 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Low Kick) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Thunderbolt) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
122.06 Atk for Dondozo (Thunderbolt) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v2)
124.93 Atk for Dondozo (Psycho Boost) vs Dondozo (2v2)
121.63 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Low Kick) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
122.97 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
123.53 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
129.25 Atk for Regidrago (Thunderbolt) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Psycho Boost) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Low Kick) vs Regidrago (1v0 no bait)
123.97 Atk for Cresselia (Thunderbolt) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
125.01 Atk for Cresselia (Psycho Boost) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
129.90 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
132.60 Atk for Walrein (Thunderbolt) vs Walrein (1v1)
123.17 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v0)
132.16 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v1)
127.23 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Low Kick) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
129.33 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
130.29 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
125.29 Atk for Toucannon (Thunderbolt) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
126.07 Atk for Toucannon (Psycho Boost) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
127.96 Atk for Toucannon (Low Kick) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
122.67 Atk for Ampharos (Psycho Boost) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
124.41 Atk for Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
132.09 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
132.45 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
123.21 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
123.58 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
127.84 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Low Kick) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
125.69 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.91 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.87 Atk for Seismitoad (Psycho Boost) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
126.80 Atk for Seismitoad (Thunderbolt) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
121.32 Atk for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
127.93 Atk for Miltank (Psycho Boost) vs Miltank (1v1 with bait)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1 no bait)
132.72 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1 no bait)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
122.60 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
123.09 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
122.20 Atk for Blastoise (Thunderbolt) vs Blastoise (2v1)
123.23 Atk for Blastoise (Psycho Boost) vs Blastoise (2v1)
122.64 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)
123.36 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)
132.96 Atk for Clefable (Thunderbolt) vs Clefable (1v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

132.81 Atk flips Melmetal (2v2) [223 IVs]
132.81 Atk flips Tinkaton (1v0) [223 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Melmetal (2v2)
vs Tinkaton (1v0)

Member IVs (197)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/0/15 👑	133.21	276.47	127	#36	+4	-5.5	+0.9	-6.5
15/11/10 👑	133.21	285.69	123	#70	+8	-8.4	-5.9	+1.4
15/0/13 👑	133.61	277.30	126	#71	+3	-13.3	-1.0	-2.4
15/3/12 👑	133.61	279.82	125	#74	+3	-11.4	-3.7	-0.6
15/13/9 👑	133.21	287.37	122	#79	+8	-11.6	-4.0	+0.8
15/1/14	133.21	277.31	126	#89	+3	-13.5	-1.2	-2.4
15/2/14 👑	133.21	278.15	126	#93	+5	-9.4	-4.0	-1.8
15/4/13 👑	133.21	279.83	125	#100	+3	-11.7	-3.9	-0.7
15/2/12	133.61	278.98	125	#105	+3	-11.6	-5.1	-0.9
15/0/12	133.61	277.30	125	#128	+1	-16.5	-3.0	-1.8
15/1/12	133.61	278.14	125	#134	+3	-12.3	-5.8	-1.1
15/14/7 👑	133.61	289.06	121	#151	+3	-12.3	-1.4	-7.6
15/3/13	133.21	278.99	125	#157	+3	-11.9	-5.3	-0.9
15/0/14	133.21	276.47	126	#158	+2	-13.7	-0.7	-8.3
15/1/13	133.21	277.31	125	#177	+1	-16.7	-3.2	-1.8
15/2/13	133.21	278.15	125	#180	+3	-12.5	-6.1	-1.2
15/13/7	133.61	288.22	121	#193	+2	-15.4	-1.9	-5.8
15/15/8	133.21	289.04	121	#198	+3	-12.5	-1.6	-7.7
15/12/7	133.61	287.38	121	#200	+4	-15.7	-1.0	-6.0
15/12/8	133.61	287.38	121	#201	+4	-15.7	-1.0	-6.0
15/12/9	133.21	286.53	122	#202	+5	-13.8	-6.5	-0.7
15/3/11	133.61	279.82	124	#251	+0	-16.8	-6.8	-1.9
15/14/8	133.21	288.20	121	#252	+2	-15.7	-2.1	-5.9
15/13/8	133.21	287.37	121	#258	+4	-16.0	-1.2	-6.1
15/5/11 👑	133.61	281.50	124	#260	-1	-15.6	-8.6	-2.9
15/4/11	133.61	280.66	124	#264	-1	-16.4	-9.0	-3.0
15/11/9	133.21	285.69	122	#268	+5	-15.1	-6.7	-4.5
15/10/10	133.21	284.85	123	#269	+3	-14.9	-6.8	-4.3
15/0/11	133.61	277.30	124	#270	-3	-18.6	-4.5	-3.2
15/2/11	133.61	278.98	124	#274	-1	-17.0	-6.9	-2.1
15/7/12 👑	133.21	282.34	124	#278	+1	-15.5	-9.2	-2.4
15/9/10	133.21	284.01	123	#285	+2	-16.0	-7.0	-4.3
15/9/11	133.21	284.01	123	#286	+2	-16.0	-7.0	-4.3
15/4/12	133.21	279.83	124	#302	+0	-17.0	-7.0	-2.0
15/15/6 👑	133.61	289.90	120	#303	+1	-15.1	-2.9	-10.2
15/7/10 👑	133.61	283.18	123	#307	+0	-17.0	-10.2	-4.9
15/6/12	133.21	281.50	124	#311	-1	-15.9	-8.8	-2.9
15/5/12	133.21	280.66	124	#314	-1	-16.7	-9.3	-3.0
15/9/9 👑	133.61	284.86	122	#316	+3	-17.3	-6.5	-6.0
15/1/11	133.61	278.14	124	#319	-2	-18.1	-7.3	-2.6
15/11/7	133.61	286.54	121	#334	+1	-17.9	-3.4	-7.2
15/11/8	133.61	286.54	121	#335	+1	-17.9	-3.4	-7.2
15/8/10	133.21	283.18	123	#344	+0	-17.3	-10.4	-4.9
15/8/11	133.21	283.18	123	#345	+0	-17.3	-10.4	-4.9
15/10/7	133.61	285.70	121	#355	+1	-19.2	-3.5	-7.2
15/10/8	133.61	285.70	121	#356	+1	-19.2	-3.5	-7.2
15/15/5	133.61	289.90	119	#389	+1	-16.8	-6.6	-8.6
15/14/6	133.61	289.06	120	#400	+0	-19.6	-2.9	-10.7
15/6/10	133.61	282.34	123	#410	-1	-18.9	-10.5	-5.4
15/13/6	133.61	288.22	120	#414	-1	-20.1	-3.8	-8.9
… 147 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Ninetales (Alolan) Atk · atk≥132.45 (422 IV spreads)

Clears 58 anchors across 7 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Blastoise, Corviknight, +23 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Ninetales (Alolan) (3 scenario flips).

125.33 Atk for Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
127.19 Atk for Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
130.78 Atk for Corviknight (Low Kick) vs Corviknight (2v2)
128.52 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Psycho Boost) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
129.26 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Thunderbolt) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
122.36 Atk for Empoleon (Thunderbolt) vs Empoleon (0v1, 2v2)
127.29 Atk for Empoleon (Psycho Boost) vs Empoleon (2v2)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Low Kick) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
121.82 Atk for Cramorant (Psycho Boost) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.85 Atk for Cramorant (Thunderbolt) vs Cramorant (0v1)
122.73 Atk for Cramorant (Low Kick) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.15 Atk for Rillaboom (Psycho Boost) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
122.05 Atk for Rillaboom (Thunderbolt) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
131.84 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.07 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
122.06 Atk for Dondozo (Thunderbolt) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v2)
124.93 Atk for Dondozo (Psycho Boost) vs Dondozo (2v2)
121.63 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Low Kick) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
122.97 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
123.53 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
129.25 Atk for Regidrago (Thunderbolt) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Psycho Boost) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Low Kick) vs Regidrago (1v0 no bait)
123.97 Atk for Cresselia (Thunderbolt) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
125.01 Atk for Cresselia (Psycho Boost) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
129.90 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
123.17 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v0)
132.16 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v1)
127.23 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Low Kick) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
129.33 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
130.29 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
125.29 Atk for Toucannon (Thunderbolt) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
126.07 Atk for Toucannon (Psycho Boost) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
127.96 Atk for Toucannon (Low Kick) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
122.67 Atk for Ampharos (Psycho Boost) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
124.41 Atk for Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
132.09 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
132.45 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
123.21 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
123.58 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
127.84 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Low Kick) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
125.69 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.91 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.87 Atk for Seismitoad (Psycho Boost) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
126.80 Atk for Seismitoad (Thunderbolt) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
121.32 Atk for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
127.93 Atk for Miltank (Psycho Boost) vs Miltank (1v1 with bait)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1 no bait)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
122.60 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
123.09 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
122.20 Atk for Blastoise (Thunderbolt) vs Blastoise (2v1)
123.23 Atk for Blastoise (Psycho Boost) vs Blastoise (2v1)
122.64 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)
123.36 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

131.98 Atk flips Walrein (1v1) [494 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Walrein (1v1)

Member IVs (422)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/0/15 👑	132.77	277.30	127	#33	+2	-3.2	-3.5	-2.4
15/0/15 👑	133.21	276.47	127	#36	+4	-5.5	+0.9	-6.5
15/11/10 👑	133.21	285.69	123	#70	+8	-8.4	-5.9	+1.4
15/0/13 👑	133.61	277.30	126	#71	+3	-13.3	-1.0	-2.4
15/3/12 👑	133.61	279.82	125	#74	+3	-11.4	-3.7	-0.6
15/13/9 👑	133.21	287.37	122	#79	+8	-11.6	-4.0	+0.8
14/5/13 👑	132.77	281.50	126	#84	+5	-7.3	-7.3	-3.3
15/1/14	133.21	277.31	126	#89	+3	-13.5	-1.2	-2.4
15/2/14 👑	133.21	278.15	126	#93	+5	-9.4	-4.0	-1.8
15/13/11 👑	132.81	286.51	123	#99	+4	-7.1	-9.4	-0.6
15/4/13 👑	133.21	279.83	125	#100	+3	-11.7	-3.9	-0.7
14/11/10 👑	132.77	286.54	123	#103	+4	-7.2	-9.6	-0.7
15/2/12	133.61	278.98	125	#105	+3	-11.6	-5.1	-0.9
15/6/14 👑	132.81	280.66	126	#113	+5	-8.8	-7.4	-3.3
15/12/11	132.81	285.67	123	#114	+4	-7.4	-9.7	-0.6
14/4/13	132.77	280.66	126	#120	+5	-8.9	-7.5	-3.4
14/10/10	132.77	285.70	123	#123	+4	-7.5	-9.8	-0.7
15/5/14	132.81	279.83	126	#127	+2	-5.9	-7.6	-3.6
15/0/12	133.61	277.30	125	#128	+1	-16.5	-3.0	-1.8
14/7/12 👑	132.77	283.18	125	#132	-1	-5.1	-8.7	-4.4
14/3/13	132.77	279.82	126	#133	+2	-6.0	-7.7	-3.7
15/1/12	133.61	278.14	125	#134	+3	-12.3	-5.8	-1.1
15/4/14	132.81	278.99	126	#136	+2	-6.0	-7.6	-3.7
15/4/15	132.81	278.99	126	#137	+2	-6.0	-7.6	-3.7
14/14/9 👑	132.77	289.06	122	#142	+0	-9.7	-8.6	-0.4
14/2/13	132.77	278.98	126	#144	+2	-6.2	-7.7	-3.8
14/2/14	132.77	278.98	126	#145	+2	-6.2	-7.7	-3.8
15/15/10 👑	132.81	288.18	122	#146	+0	-10.3	-7.7	-1.0
14/13/9	132.77	288.22	122	#150	+0	-10.3	-7.8	-1.1
15/14/7 👑	133.61	289.06	121	#151	+3	-12.3	-1.4	-7.6
15/8/13 👑	132.81	282.33	125	#154	+0	-8.1	-9.7	-3.0
15/3/13	133.21	278.99	125	#157	+3	-11.9	-5.3	-0.9
15/0/14	133.21	276.47	126	#158	+2	-13.7	-0.7	-8.3
15/14/10	132.81	287.34	122	#160	+0	-10.6	-7.8	-1.1
14/6/12	132.77	282.34	125	#161	+0	-8.2	-9.8	-3.1
14/12/9	132.77	287.38	122	#163	+0	-10.7	-7.9	-1.2
14/9/11 👑	132.77	284.86	124	#167	+1	-9.7	-6.5	-1.2
15/7/13	132.81	281.50	125	#171	-1	-8.5	-9.8	-3.5
14/5/12	132.77	281.50	125	#174	-1	-8.6	-10.0	-3.6
15/1/13	133.21	277.31	125	#177	+1	-16.7	-3.2	-1.8
15/2/13	133.21	278.15	125	#180	+3	-12.5	-6.1	-1.2
15/2/15	132.81	277.32	126	#181	-1	-12.6	-5.0	-4.5
15/3/14	132.81	278.15	126	#183	+1	-8.4	-7.7	-3.9
15/3/15	132.81	278.15	126	#184	+1	-8.4	-7.7	-3.9
14/0/13	132.77	277.30	126	#186	-1	-12.6	-5.1	-4.6
14/0/14	132.77	277.30	126	#187	-1	-12.6	-5.1	-4.6
15/5/13	132.81	279.83	125	#188	-1	-10.6	-7.7	-2.7
14/1/13	132.77	278.14	126	#189	+1	-8.5	-7.9	-4.0
14/1/14	132.77	278.14	126	#190	+1	-8.5	-7.9	-4.0
15/13/7	133.61	288.22	121	#193	+2	-15.4	-1.9	-5.8
… 372 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Walrein Atk · atk≥132.60 (422 IV spreads)

Clears 61 anchors across 7 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Blastoise, Corviknight, +24 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Walrein (1 scenario flip).

125.33 Atk for Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
127.19 Atk for Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
130.78 Atk for Corviknight (Low Kick) vs Corviknight (2v2)
128.52 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Psycho Boost) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
129.26 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Thunderbolt) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
122.36 Atk for Empoleon (Thunderbolt) vs Empoleon (0v1, 2v2)
127.29 Atk for Empoleon (Psycho Boost) vs Empoleon (2v2)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Low Kick) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
121.82 Atk for Cramorant (Psycho Boost) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.85 Atk for Cramorant (Thunderbolt) vs Cramorant (0v1)
122.73 Atk for Cramorant (Low Kick) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.15 Atk for Rillaboom (Psycho Boost) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
122.05 Atk for Rillaboom (Thunderbolt) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
131.84 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.07 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Low Kick) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Thunderbolt) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
122.06 Atk for Dondozo (Thunderbolt) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v2)
124.93 Atk for Dondozo (Psycho Boost) vs Dondozo (2v2)
121.63 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Low Kick) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
122.97 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
123.53 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
129.25 Atk for Regidrago (Thunderbolt) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Psycho Boost) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Low Kick) vs Regidrago (1v0 no bait)
123.97 Atk for Cresselia (Thunderbolt) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
125.01 Atk for Cresselia (Psycho Boost) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
129.90 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
132.60 Atk for Walrein (Thunderbolt) vs Walrein (1v1)
123.17 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v0)
132.16 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v1)
127.23 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Low Kick) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
129.33 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
130.29 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
125.29 Atk for Toucannon (Thunderbolt) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
126.07 Atk for Toucannon (Psycho Boost) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
127.96 Atk for Toucannon (Low Kick) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
122.67 Atk for Ampharos (Psycho Boost) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
124.41 Atk for Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
132.09 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
132.45 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
123.21 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
123.58 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
127.84 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Low Kick) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
125.69 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.91 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.87 Atk for Seismitoad (Psycho Boost) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
126.80 Atk for Seismitoad (Thunderbolt) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
121.32 Atk for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
127.93 Atk for Miltank (Psycho Boost) vs Miltank (1v1 with bait)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1 no bait)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
122.60 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
123.09 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
122.20 Atk for Blastoise (Thunderbolt) vs Blastoise (2v1)
123.23 Atk for Blastoise (Psycho Boost) vs Blastoise (2v1)
122.64 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)
123.36 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)

Member IVs (422)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/0/15 👑	132.77	277.30	127	#33	+2	-3.2	-3.5	-2.4
15/0/15 👑	133.21	276.47	127	#36	+4	-5.5	+0.9	-6.5
15/11/10 👑	133.21	285.69	123	#70	+8	-8.4	-5.9	+1.4
15/0/13 👑	133.61	277.30	126	#71	+3	-13.3	-1.0	-2.4
15/3/12 👑	133.61	279.82	125	#74	+3	-11.4	-3.7	-0.6
15/13/9 👑	133.21	287.37	122	#79	+8	-11.6	-4.0	+0.8
14/5/13 👑	132.77	281.50	126	#84	+5	-7.3	-7.3	-3.3
15/1/14	133.21	277.31	126	#89	+3	-13.5	-1.2	-2.4
15/2/14 👑	133.21	278.15	126	#93	+5	-9.4	-4.0	-1.8
15/13/11 👑	132.81	286.51	123	#99	+4	-7.1	-9.4	-0.6
15/4/13 👑	133.21	279.83	125	#100	+3	-11.7	-3.9	-0.7
14/11/10 👑	132.77	286.54	123	#103	+4	-7.2	-9.6	-0.7
15/2/12	133.61	278.98	125	#105	+3	-11.6	-5.1	-0.9
15/6/14 👑	132.81	280.66	126	#113	+5	-8.8	-7.4	-3.3
15/12/11	132.81	285.67	123	#114	+4	-7.4	-9.7	-0.6
14/4/13	132.77	280.66	126	#120	+5	-8.9	-7.5	-3.4
14/10/10	132.77	285.70	123	#123	+4	-7.5	-9.8	-0.7
15/5/14	132.81	279.83	126	#127	+2	-5.9	-7.6	-3.6
15/0/12	133.61	277.30	125	#128	+1	-16.5	-3.0	-1.8
14/7/12 👑	132.77	283.18	125	#132	-1	-5.1	-8.7	-4.4
14/3/13	132.77	279.82	126	#133	+2	-6.0	-7.7	-3.7
15/1/12	133.61	278.14	125	#134	+3	-12.3	-5.8	-1.1
15/4/14	132.81	278.99	126	#136	+2	-6.0	-7.6	-3.7
15/4/15	132.81	278.99	126	#137	+2	-6.0	-7.6	-3.7
14/14/9 👑	132.77	289.06	122	#142	+0	-9.7	-8.6	-0.4
14/2/13	132.77	278.98	126	#144	+2	-6.2	-7.7	-3.8
14/2/14	132.77	278.98	126	#145	+2	-6.2	-7.7	-3.8
15/15/10 👑	132.81	288.18	122	#146	+0	-10.3	-7.7	-1.0
14/13/9	132.77	288.22	122	#150	+0	-10.3	-7.8	-1.1
15/14/7 👑	133.61	289.06	121	#151	+3	-12.3	-1.4	-7.6
15/8/13 👑	132.81	282.33	125	#154	+0	-8.1	-9.7	-3.0
15/3/13	133.21	278.99	125	#157	+3	-11.9	-5.3	-0.9
15/0/14	133.21	276.47	126	#158	+2	-13.7	-0.7	-8.3
15/14/10	132.81	287.34	122	#160	+0	-10.6	-7.8	-1.1
14/6/12	132.77	282.34	125	#161	+0	-8.2	-9.8	-3.1
14/12/9	132.77	287.38	122	#163	+0	-10.7	-7.9	-1.2
14/9/11 👑	132.77	284.86	124	#167	+1	-9.7	-6.5	-1.2
15/7/13	132.81	281.50	125	#171	-1	-8.5	-9.8	-3.5
14/5/12	132.77	281.50	125	#174	-1	-8.6	-10.0	-3.6
15/1/13	133.21	277.31	125	#177	+1	-16.7	-3.2	-1.8
15/2/13	133.21	278.15	125	#180	+3	-12.5	-6.1	-1.2
15/2/15	132.81	277.32	126	#181	-1	-12.6	-5.0	-4.5
15/3/14	132.81	278.15	126	#183	+1	-8.4	-7.7	-3.9
15/3/15	132.81	278.15	126	#184	+1	-8.4	-7.7	-3.9
14/0/13	132.77	277.30	126	#186	-1	-12.6	-5.1	-4.6
14/0/14	132.77	277.30	126	#187	-1	-12.6	-5.1	-4.6
15/5/13	132.81	279.83	125	#188	-1	-10.6	-7.7	-2.7
14/1/13	132.77	278.14	126	#189	+1	-8.5	-7.9	-4.0
14/1/14	132.77	278.14	126	#190	+1	-8.5	-7.9	-4.0
15/13/7	133.61	288.22	121	#193	+2	-15.4	-1.9	-5.8
… 372 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

General · atk≥121.15, def≥276.50 (3837 IV spreads)

Clears 2 anchors across 2 shield scenarios, covering Rillaboom, Snorlax. Floor across 31 atk breakpoint opponents + 30 bulkpoint opponents. Clears the easiest anchor for every opponent.

121.15 Atk for Rillaboom (Psycho Boost) vs Rillaboom (2v0)
276.50 Def + 119 HP for Snorlax bulk (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (1v1 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

276.48 Def flips Cramorant (2v2) [4094 IVs]
276.48 Def flips Virizion (1v1 no bait) [4094 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Blastoise (2v1)
vs Cramorant (0v1)
vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v0)
vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
vs Empoleon (0v1)

Member IVs (3837)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
11/15/15 👑	129.86	289.04	127	#1	+11	+0.4	+0.7	-1.5
10/15/15 👑	129.41	289.90	127	#2	+6	+1.3	-1.8	-1.7
12/13/15 👑	130.70	287.37	127	#3	+13	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
11/13/15 👑	130.25	288.22	127	#4	+10	+0.0	-0.5	-1.2
11/12/15	130.25	287.38	127	#5	+11	-0.3	-0.5	-0.7
11/14/15	129.86	288.20	127	#6	+8	-1.5	+0.4	-1.9
10/14/15	129.41	289.06	127	#7	+5	-0.5	-2.0	-2.2
13/15/14 👑	131.14	288.18	126	#8	+6	-3.3	+0.4	-3.3
12/13/13 👑	131.09	288.22	126	#9	+5	-3.3	+0.4	-3.3
13/14/14	131.14	287.34	126	#10	+8	-3.6	+0.4	-2.8
12/12/13	131.09	287.38	126	#11	+7	-3.6	+0.3	-2.9
10/13/15	129.41	288.22	127	#12	+0	-2.4	-2.3	-2.6
11/15/13 👑	130.25	289.90	126	#13	+6	-0.0	-0.6	-5.7
11/15/14 👑	130.25	289.90	126	#14	+6	-0.0	-0.6	-5.7
10/12/15	129.41	287.38	127	#15	+0	-2.7	-2.4	-2.1
9/15/15	128.57	289.90	127	#16	+0	-0.5	-1.7	-4.3
12/12/15	130.70	286.53	127	#17	+10	-3.6	-2.9	-1.1
11/11/15	130.25	286.54	127	#18	+8	-3.9	-3.4	-1.8
12/11/15	130.70	285.69	127	#19	+9	-2.8	-4.2	-1.0
12/9/15 👑	131.09	284.86	127	#20	+6	-1.2	-3.3	-2.9
11/10/15	130.25	285.70	127	#21	+7	-3.1	-4.8	-1.8
12/15/12 👑	131.09	289.90	125	#22	+2	-1.8	-2.6	-3.5
12/15/14 👑	130.70	289.04	126	#23	+6	-4.5	-0.3	-5.5
9/14/15	128.57	289.06	127	#24	+0	-2.3	-1.9	-4.8
15/15/12 👑	132.42	287.32	124	#25	-2	-1.3	-5.6	-0.7
13/13/14	131.14	286.51	126	#26	+3	-5.1	-2.5	-4.3
14/15/15 👑	131.19	286.45	126	#27	+3	-5.1	-2.5	-4.3
12/11/13	131.09	286.54	126	#28	+2	-5.1	-2.6	-4.3
12/11/14	131.09	286.54	126	#29	+2	-5.1	-2.6	-4.3
10/15/13	129.41	289.90	126	#30	+0	-2.5	-3.8	-7.1
10/15/14	129.41	289.90	126	#31	+0	-2.5	-3.8	-7.1
12/14/14	130.70	288.20	126	#32	+3	-5.2	-0.5	-5.9
14/0/15 👑	132.77	277.30	127	#33	+2	-3.2	-3.5	-2.4
12/13/14	130.70	287.37	126	#34	+5	-5.5	-0.6	-5.5
13/15/15	130.75	287.32	126	#35	+5	-5.5	-0.6	-5.5
11/14/13	130.25	289.06	126	#37	+3	-7.2	-0.8	-6.2
11/14/14	130.25	289.06	126	#38	+3	-7.2	-0.8	-6.2
9/13/15	128.57	288.22	127	#39	+0	-4.2	-2.3	-5.2
12/14/12	131.09	289.06	125	#40	-1	-7.5	-2.6	-1.1
14/13/13 👑	131.98	286.51	125	#41	+2	-7.1	-4.7	+0.5
13/11/12 👑	131.93	286.54	125	#42	+2	-7.2	-4.8	+0.5
10/11/15	129.41	286.54	127	#43	+0	-6.1	-5.3	-3.1
9/12/15	128.57	287.38	127	#44	+0	-4.5	-2.3	-4.8
13/12/14	131.14	285.67	126	#45	+2	-5.9	-3.9	-4.0
13/12/15	131.14	285.67	126	#46	+2	-5.9	-3.9	-4.0
14/14/15	131.19	285.62	126	#47	+2	-5.9	-3.9	-4.0
12/15/15	130.31	288.18	126	#48	+2	-7.9	-0.9	-6.2
12/10/13	131.09	285.70	126	#49	+1	-6.0	-4.0	-4.0
12/10/14	131.09	285.70	126	#50	+1	-6.0	-4.0	-4.0
13/9/13 👑	131.93	284.86	126	#51	+4	-5.8	-3.4	-2.8
… 3787 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Deoxys (Defense) Mirror Atk · atk≥133.03, hp≥115 (197 IV spreads) (−225 vs Ninetales (Alolan) Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 64 anchors across 7 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Blastoise, Clefable, +26 more. Mirror atkpoint: passing cohort wins 5 of 9 scenarios vs rank-1 SP Deoxys (Defense) (197 IVs pass).

125.33 Atk for Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
127.19 Atk for Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Corviknight (0v0, 2v2)
130.78 Atk for Corviknight (Low Kick) vs Corviknight (2v2)
132.97 Atk for Melmetal (Low Kick) vs Melmetal (2v2)
128.52 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Psycho Boost) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
129.26 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Thunderbolt) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v0)
122.36 Atk for Empoleon (Thunderbolt) vs Empoleon (0v1, 2v2)
127.29 Atk for Empoleon (Psycho Boost) vs Empoleon (2v2)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Low Kick) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0, 1v1, 2v1)
121.82 Atk for Cramorant (Psycho Boost) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.85 Atk for Cramorant (Thunderbolt) vs Cramorant (0v1)
122.73 Atk for Cramorant (Low Kick) vs Cramorant (0v1)
121.15 Atk for Rillaboom (Psycho Boost) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
122.05 Atk for Rillaboom (Thunderbolt) vs Rillaboom (1v0, 2v0)
131.84 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.07 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Lapras (0v1)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Low Kick) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
132.45 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Thunderbolt) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
122.06 Atk for Dondozo (Thunderbolt) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v2)
124.93 Atk for Dondozo (Psycho Boost) vs Dondozo (2v2)
121.63 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Low Kick) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
122.97 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
123.53 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Dusknoir (2v0)
129.25 Atk for Regidrago (Thunderbolt) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Psycho Boost) vs Regidrago (1v0)
129.83 Atk for Regidrago (Low Kick) vs Regidrago (1v0 no bait)
123.97 Atk for Cresselia (Thunderbolt) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
125.01 Atk for Cresselia (Psycho Boost) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v1)
129.90 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
132.60 Atk for Walrein (Thunderbolt) vs Walrein (1v1)
123.17 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v0, 1v1)
132.16 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v1)
127.23 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Low Kick) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
129.33 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
130.29 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
125.29 Atk for Toucannon (Thunderbolt) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
126.07 Atk for Toucannon (Psycho Boost) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
127.96 Atk for Toucannon (Low Kick) vs Toucannon (1v1, 2v2)
122.67 Atk for Ampharos (Psycho Boost) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
124.41 Atk for Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Ampharos (2v1 with bait)
132.09 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
132.45 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
123.21 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
123.58 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v1)
127.84 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Low Kick) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
125.69 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.91 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v1)
125.87 Atk for Seismitoad (Psycho Boost) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
126.80 Atk for Seismitoad (Thunderbolt) vs Seismitoad (1v0, 2v1)
121.32 Atk for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
127.93 Atk for Miltank (Psycho Boost) vs Miltank (1v1 with bait)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1 no bait)
132.72 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1 no bait)
131.95 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
122.60 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
123.09 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
122.20 Atk for Blastoise (Thunderbolt) vs Blastoise (2v1)
123.23 Atk for Blastoise (Psycho Boost) vs Blastoise (2v1)
122.64 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Thunderbolt) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)
123.36 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psycho Boost) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0 with bait)
132.96 Atk for Clefable (Thunderbolt) vs Clefable (1v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

132.81 Atk flips Tinkaton (1v0) [223 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Tinkaton (1v0)

Member IVs (197)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/0/15 👑	133.21	276.47	127	#36	+4	-5.5	+0.9	-6.5
15/11/10 👑	133.21	285.69	123	#70	+8	-8.4	-5.9	+1.4
15/0/13 👑	133.61	277.30	126	#71	+3	-13.3	-1.0	-2.4
15/3/12 👑	133.61	279.82	125	#74	+3	-11.4	-3.7	-0.6
15/13/9 👑	133.21	287.37	122	#79	+8	-11.6	-4.0	+0.8
15/1/14	133.21	277.31	126	#89	+3	-13.5	-1.2	-2.4
15/2/14 👑	133.21	278.15	126	#93	+5	-9.4	-4.0	-1.8
15/4/13 👑	133.21	279.83	125	#100	+3	-11.7	-3.9	-0.7
15/2/12	133.61	278.98	125	#105	+3	-11.6	-5.1	-0.9
15/0/12	133.61	277.30	125	#128	+1	-16.5	-3.0	-1.8
15/1/12	133.61	278.14	125	#134	+3	-12.3	-5.8	-1.1
15/14/7 👑	133.61	289.06	121	#151	+3	-12.3	-1.4	-7.6
15/3/13	133.21	278.99	125	#157	+3	-11.9	-5.3	-0.9
15/0/14	133.21	276.47	126	#158	+2	-13.7	-0.7	-8.3
15/1/13	133.21	277.31	125	#177	+1	-16.7	-3.2	-1.8
15/2/13	133.21	278.15	125	#180	+3	-12.5	-6.1	-1.2
15/13/7	133.61	288.22	121	#193	+2	-15.4	-1.9	-5.8
15/15/8	133.21	289.04	121	#198	+3	-12.5	-1.6	-7.7
15/12/7	133.61	287.38	121	#200	+4	-15.7	-1.0	-6.0
15/12/8	133.61	287.38	121	#201	+4	-15.7	-1.0	-6.0
15/12/9	133.21	286.53	122	#202	+5	-13.8	-6.5	-0.7
15/3/11	133.61	279.82	124	#251	+0	-16.8	-6.8	-1.9
15/14/8	133.21	288.20	121	#252	+2	-15.7	-2.1	-5.9
15/13/8	133.21	287.37	121	#258	+4	-16.0	-1.2	-6.1
15/5/11 👑	133.61	281.50	124	#260	-1	-15.6	-8.6	-2.9
15/4/11	133.61	280.66	124	#264	-1	-16.4	-9.0	-3.0
15/11/9	133.21	285.69	122	#268	+5	-15.1	-6.7	-4.5
15/10/10	133.21	284.85	123	#269	+3	-14.9	-6.8	-4.3
15/0/11	133.61	277.30	124	#270	-3	-18.6	-4.5	-3.2
15/2/11	133.61	278.98	124	#274	-1	-17.0	-6.9	-2.1
15/7/12 👑	133.21	282.34	124	#278	+1	-15.5	-9.2	-2.4
15/9/10	133.21	284.01	123	#285	+2	-16.0	-7.0	-4.3
15/9/11	133.21	284.01	123	#286	+2	-16.0	-7.0	-4.3
15/4/12	133.21	279.83	124	#302	+0	-17.0	-7.0	-2.0
15/15/6 👑	133.61	289.90	120	#303	+1	-15.1	-2.9	-10.2
15/7/10 👑	133.61	283.18	123	#307	+0	-17.0	-10.2	-4.9
15/6/12	133.21	281.50	124	#311	-1	-15.9	-8.8	-2.9
15/5/12	133.21	280.66	124	#314	-1	-16.7	-9.3	-3.0
15/9/9 👑	133.61	284.86	122	#316	+3	-17.3	-6.5	-6.0
15/1/11	133.61	278.14	124	#319	-2	-18.1	-7.3	-2.6
15/11/7	133.61	286.54	121	#334	+1	-17.9	-3.4	-7.2
15/11/8	133.61	286.54	121	#335	+1	-17.9	-3.4	-7.2
15/8/10	133.21	283.18	123	#344	+0	-17.3	-10.4	-4.9
15/8/11	133.21	283.18	123	#345	+0	-17.3	-10.4	-4.9
15/10/7	133.61	285.70	121	#355	+1	-19.2	-3.5	-7.2
15/10/8	133.61	285.70	121	#356	+1	-19.2	-3.5	-7.2
15/15/5	133.61	289.90	119	#389	+1	-16.8	-6.6	-8.6
15/14/6	133.61	289.06	120	#400	+0	-19.6	-2.9	-10.7
15/6/10	133.61	282.34	123	#410	-1	-18.9	-10.5	-5.4
15/13/6	133.61	288.22	120	#414	-1	-20.1	-3.8	-8.9
… 147 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Per-matchup IV finder (163 specific matchups - e.g. "which IV beats a given opponent in a given shield?")

Collapsed by default. This is a per-(opponent, shield) lookup: each card is one matchup and the exact IV spreads that win it. For "what do I need vs threat X" use Threats where your build choice matters above, or paste your collection into the scatter. Composite cards (slayer ∩ tier) surface IVs that satisfy a slayer anchor and a stat-cutoff tier; pure slayer-archetype cards live in the Slayer Builds block below, pure tier cards in the Threshold Tiers above.

Show only notable categories (≤ 5% of cohort or ≤ 5 members). Uncheck to see every non-trivial intersection.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Clefable Atk (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Clefable Atk · atk≥132.957

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +2.2, spread 1.4)

15/0/11 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 277.30, hp 124, SP #592

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/12 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 277.30, hp 125, SP #430

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/13 👑 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 277.30, hp 126, SP #254

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/1/11 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 278.14, hp 124, SP #531

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/1/12 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 278.14, hp 125, SP #368

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/2/11 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 278.98, hp 124, SP #471

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/2/12 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 278.98, hp 125, SP #299

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/3/11 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 279.82, hp 124, SP #411

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/3/12 👑 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 279.82, hp 125, SP #229

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/4/11 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 280.66, hp 124, SP #345

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/5/11 👑 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 281.50, hp 124, SP #276

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/7/10 👑 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 283.18, hp 123, SP #326

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/12/7 slight atk weight - atk 133.61, def 287.38, hp 121, SP #362

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/12/8 slight atk weight - atk 133.61, def 287.38, hp 121, SP #361

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/13/7 slight atk weight - atk 133.61, def 288.22, hp 121, SP #296

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/14/7 👑 slight atk weight - atk 133.61, def 289.06, hp 121, SP #230

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Clefable Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/9/9 👑 slight atk weight - atk 133.61, def 284.86, hp 122, SP #378

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Trades mirror dominance (128/130 wins, vs 130/130 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Clefable Atk cutoff.

15/11/7 slight atk weight - atk 133.61, def 286.54, hp 121, SP #426

15/11/8 slight atk weight - atk 133.61, def 286.54, hp 121, SP #425

15/15/6 👑 slight atk weight - atk 133.61, def 289.90, hp 120, SP #355

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Clefable Atk threshold (atk≥132.957). Trades mirror dominance (105/130 wins, vs 130/130 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Clefable Atk cutoff.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Deoxys (Defense) Mirror Atk (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Deoxys (Defense) Mirror Atk · atk≥132.97, hp≥115

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +2.2, spread 1.4)

15/0/11 atk tilt - atk 133.61, def 277.30, hp 124, SP #592

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Deoxys (Defense) Mirror Atk threshold (atk≥132.97, hp≥115). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Deoxys (Defense) Mirror Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.