Guzzlord Great League IV Dive

Opponent list (78 mons)

Melmetal, Altaria, Ninetales (Shadow), Cramorant, Tinkaton, Mimikyu, Corviknight, Corsola (Galarian), Altaria (Shadow), Corviknight (Shadow), Florges, Quagsire (Shadow), Ninetales, Quagsire, Araquanid, Clodsire, Sableye (Shadow), Marowak, Stunfisk, Vigoroth, Jellicent, Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow), Fearow, Mantine, Snorlax, Umbreon, Araquanid (Shadow), Feraligatr, Annihilape, Azumarill, Deoxys (Defense), Electrode (Hisuian), Rillaboom, Sableye, Vigoroth (Shadow), Annihilape (Shadow), Lapras, Snorlax (Shadow), Charjabug, Malamar, Furret, Guzzlord, Malamar (Shadow), Carbink, Charjabug (Shadow), Forretress (Shadow), Dondozo, Hippowdon, Mandibuzz, Morpeko (Full Belly), Forretress, Medicham, Jumpluff, Hydreigon (Shadow), Kingdra, Blastoise, Diggersby, Feraligatr (Shadow), Thievul (Sucker Punch / Night Slash+Icy Wind), Thievul (Sucker Punch / Night Slash+Play Rough), Sableye (Mega), Malamar (Mega), Oinkologne (Female), Aegislash (Shield), Aegislash (Blade), Ninetales (Alolan), Hippowdon (Shadow), Spidops, Toxapex, Turtonator, Cradily, Wartortle, Bombirdier, Cradily (Shadow), Forretress (Bug Bite), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)

Which one to build? [all shields, equal] Build 1 (66 spreads: Atk >= 116.30 and Def >= 61.50 and HP >= 263) guarantees 22 of 47 decision matchups, 9 of them under every opponent-IV mode; Build 2 (384: Def >= 64.20 and HP >= 264 (bulk box)) guarantees 21 and holds stat-product rank-1 (SP1).

Build criteria: the same control as the one in the scatter strip below; either handle moves both

Guzzlord running Dragon Tail / Brutal Swing, Dragon Claw.

[all shields, equal] Build 1 (66 spreads: Atk >= 116.30 and Def >= 61.50 and HP >= 263) guarantees 22 of 47 decision matchups, 9 of them under every opponent-IV mode; Build 2 (384: Def >= 64.20 and HP >= 264 (bulk box)) guarantees 21 and holds stat-product rank-1 (SP1).

Single-stat line: Defense >= 64.29 decides 1v1 Malamar (Shadow). SP1 clears it.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 116.30 and Def >= 61.50 and HP >= 263	66	22 of 47, 0 of them material; 9 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Vigoroth (outside 29%)	10: 0v0 Marowak, 0v0 Annihilape, +8 more	7/5/6 (390 of 702 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (22 of 47), its 66 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (6) 0v0 Malamar (rank 42) -- outside 29%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 40) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Cramorant (rank 4) -- outside 56%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 48) -- outside 83% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Ninetales (rank 13) -- outside 39%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 (3) 1v1 Rillaboom (rank 35) -- outside 66% 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 30) -- outside 84% 1v2 (5) 1v2 Vigoroth (rank 21) -- outside 29%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Charjabug (rank 41) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 40) -- outside 58%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Electrode (Hisuian) (rank 34) -- outside 87% 2v1 (1) 2v1 Melmetal (rank 1) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (6) 2v2 Vigoroth (Shadow) (rank 37) -- outside 29%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Clodsire (rank 17) -- outside 72%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Vigoroth (rank 21) -- outside 77%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Guzzlord (rank 44) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (66), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 116.40	1206	11 of 47, 0 of them material; 1 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	21: 0v0 Sableye (Shadow), 0v0 Marowak, +19 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 100% of the same spreads (0 extra, 6 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 66 spreads in 1206 of its own, and keeps 11 of Build 1's 22 guaranteed matchups (none of them material). The 11 it gives up out here: 1v2 Charjabug (grid 50%), 1v1 Rillaboom (grid 67%) and 2v2 Clodsire (grid 73%), and 8 more.
Build 2 (fork)	Def >= 64.20 and HP >= 264 (bulk box)	384	21 of 47, 0 of them material; 14 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Cramorant (outside 13%)	11: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v0 Malamar, +9 more	1/11/9 (392 of 702 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 2 guarantees (21 of 47), its 384 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (6) 0v0 Cramorant (rank 4) -- outside 52% 0v0 Annihilape (rank 31) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Marowak (rank 19) -- outside 61%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 48) -- outside 82% 1v0 (1) 1v0 Araquanid (rank 16) -- outside 54% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 45) -- outside 24% 1v1 Rillaboom (rank 35) -- outside 64% 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 30) -- outside 83% 1v2 (6) 1v2 Cramorant (rank 4) -- outside 13%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Furret (rank 43) -- outside 14%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Feraligatr (rank 30) -- outside 25%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Umbreon (rank 28) -- outside 44% 2v1 (1) 2v1 Araquanid (Shadow) (rank 29) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (4) 2v2 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 45) -- outside 38% 2v2 Clodsire (rank 17) -- outside 70% Members (384), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 2 (fork)'s most-winning spread 1/11/9@20 wins 2 more matchups overall (392 against 390, of 702), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 1 more of the 47 decision matchups (22 against 21).

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 116.30 and Def >= 61.50 and HP >= 263	66	15 of 25 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 22 of 47 overall, 0 of them material; 9 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Vigoroth (outside 29%)	10: 0v0 Marowak, 0v0 Annihilape, +8 more	5/3/2 (147 of 234 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (15 of 25 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 22 of 47 overall), its 66 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (6) 0v0 Malamar (rank 42) -- outside 29%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 40) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Cramorant (rank 4) -- outside 56%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 48) -- outside 83% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Ninetales (rank 13) -- outside 39%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 (3) 1v1 Rillaboom (rank 35) -- outside 66% 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 30) -- outside 84% 1v2 (5) 1v2 Vigoroth (rank 21) -- outside 29%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Charjabug (rank 41) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 40) -- outside 58%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Electrode (Hisuian) (rank 34) -- outside 87% 2v1 (1) 2v1 Melmetal (rank 1) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (6) 2v2 Vigoroth (Shadow) (rank 37) -- outside 29%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Clodsire (rank 17) -- outside 72%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Vigoroth (rank 21) -- outside 77%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Guzzlord (rank 44) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (66), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Def >= 61.50 and HP >= 263 (bulk box)	1380	7 of 25 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 9 of 47 overall, 0 of them material; 8 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	23: 0v0 Cramorant, 0v0 Marowak, +21 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 66 spreads in 1380 of its own, and keeps 7 of Build 1's 15 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (9 of its 22 overall, none of them material). The 13 it gives up out here: 1v2 Vigoroth (grid 30%), 2v2 Vigoroth (Shadow) (grid 30%) and 0v0 Malamar (grid 30%), and 10 more.
Build 2 (fork)	Def >= 64.20 and HP >= 264 (bulk box)	384	13 of 25 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 21 of 47 overall, 0 of them material; 14 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Cramorant (outside 13%)	11: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v0 Malamar, +9 more	1/11/9 (151 of 234 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 2 guarantees (13 of 25 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 21 of 47 overall), its 384 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (6) 0v0 Cramorant (rank 4) -- outside 52% 0v0 Annihilape (rank 31) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Marowak (rank 19) -- outside 61%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 48) -- outside 82% 1v0 (1) 1v0 Araquanid (rank 16) -- outside 54% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 45) -- outside 24% 1v1 Rillaboom (rank 35) -- outside 64% 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 30) -- outside 83% 1v2 (6) 1v2 Cramorant (rank 4) -- outside 13%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Furret (rank 43) -- outside 14%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Feraligatr (rank 30) -- outside 25%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Umbreon (rank 28) -- outside 44% 2v1 (1) 2v1 Araquanid (Shadow) (rank 29) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (4) 2v2 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 45) -- outside 38% 2v2 Clodsire (rank 17) -- outside 70% Members (384), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 2 (fork)'s most-winning spread 1/11/9@20 wins 4 more matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (151 against 147, of 234), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 2 more of the 25 decision matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (15 against 13; 22 against 21 over all 47).

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	~ Def >= 64.20 and HP >= 255 (bulk box)	1124	3 of 6 in 1v1 shields; 11 of 47 overall, 0 of them material; 10 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Malamar (Shadow) (outside 5%)	nothing the other builds guarantee	0/13/6 (55 of 78 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 1 guarantees (3 of 6 in 1v1 shields; 11 of 47 overall), its 1124 members The rule covers 95% of the same spreads (36 extra, 21 missed); the member list is the build. 0v0 (4) 0v0 Marowak (rank 19) -- outside 51%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 48) -- outside 77% 0v0 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 45) -- outside 83% 1v0 (1) 1v0 Araquanid (rank 16) -- outside 42% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 45) -- outside 5% 1v1 Rillaboom (rank 35) -- outside 54% 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 30) -- outside 79% 1v2 (2) 1v2 Electrode (Hisuian) (rank 34) -- outside 82% 1v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 33) -- outside 86% 2v2 (1) Members (1124), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 110.00 and Def + 0.375*HP >= 160.5	2603	1 of 6 in 1v1 shields; 6 of 47 overall, 0 of them material; 6 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	5: 0v0 Marowak, 1v0 Araquanid, +3 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 96% of the same spreads (81 extra, 31 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 1124 spreads in 2603 of its own, and keeps 1 of Build 1's 3 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (6 of its 11 overall, none of them material). The 5 it gives up out here: 1v1 Malamar (Shadow) (grid 31%), 1v0 Araquanid (grid 58%) and 0v0 Marowak (grid 64%), and 2 more.

Rates: outside N% is the share of the spreads NOT in that build that win the same matchup anyway; grid N% (the Notable spreads list and the cards at the top of the page) is the share of all the spreads on the grid. Weight follows the rate: bold = fewer than half of them win it; bold and underlined = fewer than a quarter; bold, underlined and italic = fewer than a tenth; dim = more than nine in ten win it anyway.

Each build's guarantee list is sorted by outside rate: how often the spreads NOT in that build win the same matchup anyway. The lower the rate, the rarer the guarantee.

Against the 37 spreads the mirror-slayer protocol converges on for Guzzlord (neither attack-first nor bulk-first here), attack of 116.92 and up wins charge-move priority against 23 of them, and 117.09 and up against 31. Inside a build, take the highest attack you have: Build 1 clears the first cut with 21 of 66 and the second with 15; Build 2 clears neither with any of its 384.

Is mine in one of these?

Paste your Poke Genie CSV, or add one spread by hand, in Check my collection below; the answer comes back here, grouped by build, and your collection stays in your browser.

Shield scenario:

Y: Color:

Stat-product rank against matchups won with PvPoke-default opponent IVs at the league cap over the whole opponent pool and, with Shield scenario on all, every baked shield state -- the view the single-stat line in the expander below was derived on. The Shield scenario selector on this row is the section's own; the scatter's dropdowns and the opponent filter do not drive this panel.

SP1 1/15/15, 1/15/15, 1/11/9, 0/15/15, 1/12/6

Notable spreads

Every single spread this page names, on one list: the spread that wins the most matchups, the one with the highest avg battle score, SP1, and each build's most-winning member. Entries whose decision-matchup wins overlap by 90% or more are merged, because two spreads that win the same matchups are one offer.

1/11/9 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios) / Build 2's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 2, which guarantees 21 of the 32 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 0v2 Ninetales (Shadow) (grid 6%), 2v2 Rillaboom (grid 11%) and 2v2 Marowak (grid 11%)

What else is true of 1/11/9

1/12/6 (Highest avg battle score) and 1/15/15 (SP1) differ from it by 1 to 2 decision matchups, so this entry is the offer and they are spellings of it.

7/5/6 -- Build 1's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 1, which guarantees 22 of the 32 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v2 Hippowdon (grid 16%), 1v2 Lapras (grid 19%) and 1v2 Vigoroth (grid 30%)

What to do with this: If you already have one of these spreads, build it: each is the top of this grid on the measure that named it. If you are hunting, hunt a build instead -- see the single-stat line for what changes the score.

Wild catches needed to meet one named spread out of the 4096 on this grid: 2839 for a 50% chance, 5678 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

The single-stat line

All 5 movesets on this page share one line: at least 64.29 defense. This page is Brutal Swing, Dragon Claw, at least 64.29 defense; Brutal Swing, Crunch, Brutal Swing, Sludge Bomb, Brutal Swing and Crunch, Dragon Claw print the same line.

Line: Def >= 64.29 [gate: enough] -- 1215 of 4096 spreads (29.7%)
Decides: 1v1 Malamar (Shadow), rank 45
SP1: 1/15/15 -- clears it
Alternative: HP >= 259, Atk >= 118.54 (200 spreads, 4.9%)
Not claimed: 83 of 107 contested matchups

Guzzlord running Dragon Tail / Brutal Swing, Dragon Claw in Great League has a line at defense, which 1/15/15 at L19.5, 1/11/9 at L20, 0/15/15 at L19.5 and 1212 other spreads reach. 1215 of the 4096 IV spreads (29.7%) reach it. Every one of the 1215 spreads at or above it wins the 1v1 against Malamar (Shadow), rank 45; 56 of the 2881 below it win that fight too. That is where a PvPoke-default Malamar (Shadow) (4/15/15) stops doing 3 with PSYWAVE and starts doing 2. It points the same way in all 4 baked opponent-IV settings and in all 5 movesets baked here. It is built for the default Malamar (Shadow); a hundo Malamar (Shadow) moves it to 66.06, and the ladder further down has the rest.

SP1, 1/15/15, already clears it, so there is nothing to trade away here. It costs nothing to clear: the spread that clears the line and wins the most matchups, 1/11/9, takes 392 of 702, the same count as SP1. No higher line keeps 25% of the grid, so this is the last step this page names. Trading defense for the other stats -- 259 HP with 118.54 attack, 200 spreads -- gives up 2 matchups the line holds and picks up 5 matchups the line gives away. At most 1% of the spreads outside the pair win 2 of those; the rest are not exclusive to it. 83 of the 107 contested matchups turn on no single stat at all, and this page does not claim them.

Shield scenario:

Why these regions

Why these regions and not others. The set panel below is every candidate region the builds were cut from. Under it, the same grid grouped by which contested matchups a spread wins -- its win/loss fingerprint, not its score -- drawn on the stat planes where a region is a shape; crossing a breakpoint or bulkpoint moves a spread to the next cluster.

The set panel (an UpSet plot: a bar chart of set intersections, Lex et al. 2014). Left: the named sets the lattice was built from (rows, labelled 'spreads in the set / decision matchups every member of it wins') and the candidate regions made by intersecting them (columns -- bar height is spreads, the number above it is decision matchups guaranteed in the shield scenarios this setting counts, and a coloured column is one of the builds in the table above). A dot means the region sits inside that row's set. The letters index THIS setting's own eight sets and are re-assigned when the Build criteria change, so compare the row names across Build criteria settings, not the letters.

clusters

Shield scenario:

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2890	114.3	63.6	264	#1-#3977	10.6	-
C1	1206	117.5	60.6	263	#854-#4096	12.8	Malamar (+100pp), Hippowdon (+85pp), Shadow Snorlax (+70pp), Toxapex (+67pp); trades away Marowak (-71pp), Annihilape (-68pp), Shadow Forretress (-50pp), Shadow Malamar (-36pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Snorlax	30%	100%
Toxapex	33%	100%
Cramorant	39%	100%
Annihilape	79%	12%
Hippowdon	14%	100%
Marowak	85%	14%
Malamar	0%	100%
Wartortle	25%	27%
Shadow Forretress	98%	48%
Shadow Cradily	0%	54%
Malamar (Mega)	78%	100%
Shadow Malamar	98%	62%
Aegislash (Shield)	84%	100%
Bombirdier	87%	100%
Diggersby	100%	82%
Shadow Sableye	100%	87%
Shadow Feraligatr	5%	0%
Oinkologne (Female)	100%	90%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Snorlax	50%	wins iff atk >= 115.29	100%	named
Toxapex	52%	wins iff atk >= 115.05	100%	named
Cramorant	57%	wins iff atk >= 115.90	81%	named
Annihilape	59%	wins iff def >= 61.69	88%	named
Hippowdon	39%	wins iff atk >= 116.46	90%	named
Marowak	64%	wins iff sp >= 1,883,509	86%	named
Malamar	30%	wins iff atk >= 116.31	100%	named
Wartortle	25%	wins iff sp >= 1,943,861	85%	named
Shadow Forretress	83%	wins iff sp >= 1,858,441	92%	named
Shadow Cradily	16%	wins iff atk >= 117.34	100%	named
Malamar (Mega)	85%	wins iff atk >= 113.26	100%	named
Shadow Malamar	87%	wins iff sp >= 1,857,480	96%	named
Aegislash (Shield)	89%	wins iff atk >= 112.91	100%	named
Bombirdier	91%	wins iff atk >= 112.67	100%	named
Diggersby	95%	wins iff sp >= 1,836,820	97%	named
Shadow Sableye	96%	wins iff atk < 118.55	99%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	3%	wins iff sp >= 1,980,957	98%	named
Oinkologne (Female)	97%	wins iff sp >= 1,825,568	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1493	116.9	61.3	261	#1113-#4096	5.6	-
C1	2603	114.3	63.6	265	#1-#3607	10.0	Rillaboom (+91pp), Diggersby (+88pp), Shadow Charjabug (+75pp), Medicham (+61pp); trades away Shadow Feraligatr (-58pp), Turtonator (-15pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Diggersby	6%	94%
Shadow Cradily	1%	59%
Rillaboom	9%	100%
Shadow Malamar	6%	45%
Shadow Feraligatr	67%	8%
Shadow Charjabug	25%	99%
Shadow Hydreigon	52%	89%
Medicham	39%	100%
Shadow Vigoroth	0%	28%
Feraligatr	63%	97%
Turtonator	100%	85%
Clodsire	98%	95%
Kingdra	91%	100%
Spidops	6%	0%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Diggersby	62%	wins iff sp >= 1,890,498	87%	named
Shadow Cradily	38%	wins iff sp >= 1,917,919	85%	named
Rillaboom	67%	wins iff sp >= 1,884,226	86%	named
Shadow Malamar	31%	wins iff def >= 64.30	99%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	30%	wins iff atk >= 116.31	100%	named
Shadow Charjabug	72%	wins iff sp >= 1,874,927	88%	named
Shadow Hydreigon	75%	wins iff def >= 61.14	98%	named
Medicham	78%	wins iff sp >= 1,868,262	91%	named
Shadow Vigoroth	18%	wins iff def >= 65.32	95%	named
Feraligatr	85%	wins iff def >= 60.48	98%	named
Turtonator	90%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Clodsire	96%	wins iff atk >= 111.80	99%	named
Kingdra	97%	wins iff hp >= 255	97%	named
Spidops	2%	wins iff atk >= 119.16	99%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2560	116.4	61.7	263	#372-#4096	6.0	-
C1	1536	113.3	64.6	264	#1-#3040	7.5	Umbreon (+82pp), Feraligatr (+70pp), Bombirdier (+62pp), Shadow Malamar (+52pp); trades away Shadow Snorlax (-90pp), Charjabug (-80pp), Vigoroth (-47pp), Malamar (-26pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Charjabug	80%	0%
Umbreon	18%	100%
Bombirdier	28%	91%
Shadow Snorlax	92%	2%
Feraligatr	5%	76%
Vigoroth	47%	0%
Shadow Malamar	3%	55%
Furret	3%	53%
Cramorant	3%	51%
Lapras	19%	20%
Malamar	26%	0%
Hippowdon	25%	0%
Wartortle	75%	100%
Hisuian Electrode	79%	100%
Deoxys (Defense)	84%	100%
Malamar (Mega)	8%	0%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Charjabug	50%	wins iff atk >= 115.29	100%	named
Umbreon	49%	wins iff sp >= 1,902,225	87%	named
Bombirdier	52%	wins iff def >= 62.44	97%	named
Shadow Snorlax	58%	wins iff atk >= 114.91	100%	named
Feraligatr	32%	wins iff sp >= 1,924,981	88%	named
Vigoroth	30%	wins iff atk >= 116.31	100%	named
Shadow Malamar	23%	wins iff def >= 64.52	94%	named
Furret	22%	wins iff sp >= 1,942,526	89%	named
Cramorant	21%	wins iff sp >= 1,941,419	89%	named
Lapras	19%	wins iff hp >= 272	83%	named
Malamar	16%	wins iff atk >= 117.34	100%	named
Hippowdon	16%	wins iff atk >= 116.46	86%	named
Wartortle	84%	wins iff atk < 117.39	92%	named
Hisuian Electrode	87%	wins iff def >= 60.17	98%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	90%	wins iff sp >= 1,845,968	92%	named
Malamar (Mega)	5%	wins iff atk >= 118.55	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3368	115.8	62.2	263	#66-#4096	7.6	-
C1	728	112.5	65.5	264	#1-#2686	8.5	Fearow (+58pp), Kingdra (+56pp), Shadow Malamar (+55pp), Marowak (+44pp); trades away Guzzlord (-92pp), Vigoroth (-85pp), Shadow Vigoroth (-36pp), Sableye (Mega) (-19pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Cradily	46%	63%
Shadow Malamar	34%	89%
Forretress	62%	68%
Shadow Vigoroth	36%	0%
Clodsire	67%	100%
Vigoroth	92%	7%
Fearow	11%	69%
Guzzlord	99%	7%
Sableye (Mega)	19%	0%
Kingdra	3%	59%
Marowak	4%	48%
Shadow Hydreigon	87%	100%
Rillaboom	7%	28%
Lapras	93%	94%
Spidops	3%	22%
Empoleon	97%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Cradily	49%	wins iff hp >= 264	76%	named
Shadow Malamar	44%	wins iff def >= 64.30	82%	named
Forretress	63%	wins iff atk >= 116.06	72%	named
Shadow Vigoroth	30%	wins iff atk >= 116.31	100%	named
Clodsire	73%	wins iff sp >= 1,873,864	86%	named
Vigoroth	77%	wins iff atk >= 113.85	98%	named
Fearow	21%	wins iff sp >= 1,938,289	88%	named
Guzzlord	82%	wins iff atk >= 113.35	100%	named
Sableye (Mega)	15%	wins iff atk >= 117.39	100%	named
Kingdra	13%	wins iff def >= 65.22	97%	named
Marowak	11%	wins iff sp >= 1,954,951	92%	named
Shadow Hydreigon	89%	wins iff sp >= 1,847,987	93%	named
Rillaboom	11%	wins iff sp >= 1,969,383	91%	named
Lapras	93%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Spidops	7%	wins iff sp >= 1,976,892	95%	named
Empoleon	98%	wins iff sp >= 1,828,065	98%	named

all scenarios: 64 win/loss bits (one per contested opponent per scenario) concatenated across 4 of 9 shield scenarios (0v1, 0v2, 1v0, 2v0, 2v1 excluded as degenerate); 1374 distinct win patterns; K=2 clusters (silhouette 0.48); split at atk 116.26.

Sharpest single scenarios on this page: 1v1 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.56 over 14 contested opponents, split atk 115.78) and 0v0 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.56 over 18 contested opponents, split atk 116.38) -- pick them in the dropdown above.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1478	117.2	60.9	262	#854-#4096	32.0	-
C1	2618	114.1	63.8	264	#1-#3752	35.0	Diggersby [1v1] (+79pp), Marowak [0v0] (+76pp), Annihilape [0v0] (+74pp), Umbreon [1v2] (+72pp); trades away Malamar [0v0] (-82pp), Shadow Feraligatr [1v1] (-82pp), Vigoroth [1v2] (-82pp), Shadow Vigoroth [2v2] (-82pp)

Per-cluster win rates vs each contested opponent

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Charjabug [1v2]	98%	23%
Shadow Snorlax [0v0]	98%	23%
Umbreon [1v2]	3%	75%
Cradily [2v2]	12%	70%
Bombirdier [1v2]	10%	75%
Toxapex [0v0]	100%	26%
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	45%	43%
Cramorant [0v0]	90%	38%
Shadow Snorlax [1v2]	100%	35%
Annihilape [0v0]	12%	86%
Hippowdon [0v0]	81%	16%
Diggersby [1v1]	11%	90%
Shadow Cradily [1v1]	1%	58%
Forretress [2v2]	91%	47%
Marowak [0v0]	16%	92%
Rillaboom [1v1]	22%	92%
Feraligatr [1v2]	1%	49%
Shadow Malamar [1v1]	3%	47%
Malamar [0v0]	82%	0%
Shadow Feraligatr [1v1]	82%	0%
Vigoroth [1v2]	82%	0%
Shadow Vigoroth [2v2]	82%	0%
Shadow Charjabug [1v1]	26%	98%
Clodsire [2v2]	34%	94%
Wartortle [0v0]	22%	28%
Shadow Hydreigon [1v1]	44%	93%
Shadow Malamar [1v2]	1%	36%
Vigoroth [2v2]	100%	64%
Medicham [1v1]	38%	100%
Furret [1v2]	6%	31%
Fearow [2v2]	4%	31%
Cramorant [1v2]	1%	32%
Lapras [1v2]	3%	28%
Shadow Vigoroth [1v1]	0%	28%
Guzzlord [2v2]	100%	72%
Shadow Forretress [0v0]	54%	100%
Shadow Cradily [0v0]	44%	0%
Malamar [1v2]	44%	0%
Hippowdon [1v2]	44%	0%
Wartortle [1v2]	57%	100%
Sableye (Mega) [2v2]	43%	0%
Malamar (Mega) [0v0]	100%	76%
Feraligatr [1v1]	62%	97%
Hisuian Electrode [1v2]	67%	98%
Kingdra [2v2]	0%	21%
Shadow Malamar [0v0]	65%	100%
Marowak [2v2]	0%	18%
Aegislash (Shield) [0v0]	100%	83%
Shadow Hydreigon [2v2]	70%	100%
Rillaboom [2v2]	2%	16%
Deoxys (Defense) [1v2]	73%	100%
Turtonator [1v1]	100%	85%
Bombirdier [0v0]	100%	86%
Lapras [2v2]	100%	89%
Spidops [2v2]	5%	8%
Diggersby [0v0]	85%	100%
Malamar (Mega) [1v2]	14%	0%
Shadow Sableye [0v0]	89%	100%
Clodsire [1v1]	98%	95%
Kingdra [1v1]	93%	99%
Shadow Feraligatr [0v0]	0%	5%
Oinkologne (Female) [0v0]	92%	100%
Spidops [1v1]	7%	0%
Empoleon [2v2]	94%	100%

Green tint = the cluster mostly wins that matchup, red tint = mostly loses; the percentage is the share of the cluster's IVs that win.

Stat rules that reproduce the clusters (in-sample accuracy 93.6%)

atk < 116.26:
  atk < 115.04:
    hp < 255.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=63)
    hp >= 255.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=1884)
  atk >= 115.04:
    hp < 265.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=577)
    hp >= 265.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=357)
atk >= 116.26:
  -> cluster C0 (n=1215)

Depth-3 decision tree over (atk, def, hp). Accuracy is in-sample (regularized by a minimum leaf size), not cross-validated -- read it as "how well the clusters reduce to stat regions", not a prediction claim.

Matchup flip thresholds (candidate anchors)

The single stat and threshold that most accurately predicts win/loss across all IVs -- misclassifications allowed, so it is a diagnostic and a candidate anchor, not a build target. The "flips at" cutoffs under "Threats where your build choice matters" answer the other question (the lowest cutoff whose 75/25 split is clean) and are usually higher for the same opponent.

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Charjabug [1v2]	50%	wins iff atk >= 115.29	100%	named
Shadow Snorlax [0v0]	50%	wins iff atk >= 115.29	100%	named
Umbreon [1v2]	49%	wins iff sp >= 1,902,225	87%	named
Cradily [2v2]	49%	wins iff hp >= 264	76%	named
Bombirdier [1v2]	52%	wins iff def >= 62.44	97%	named
Toxapex [0v0]	52%	wins iff atk >= 115.05	100%	named
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	44%	wins iff def >= 64.30	82%	named
Cramorant [0v0]	57%	wins iff atk >= 115.90	81%	named
Shadow Snorlax [1v2]	58%	wins iff atk >= 114.91	100%	named
Annihilape [0v0]	59%	wins iff def >= 61.69	88%	named
Hippowdon [0v0]	39%	wins iff atk >= 116.46	90%	named
Diggersby [1v1]	62%	wins iff sp >= 1,890,498	87%	named
Shadow Cradily [1v1]	38%	wins iff sp >= 1,917,919	85%	named
Forretress [2v2]	63%	wins iff atk >= 116.06	72%	named
Marowak [0v0]	64%	wins iff sp >= 1,883,509	86%	named
Rillaboom [1v1]	67%	wins iff sp >= 1,884,226	86%	named
Feraligatr [1v2]	32%	wins iff sp >= 1,924,981	88%	named
Shadow Malamar [1v1]	31%	wins iff def >= 64.30	99%	named
Malamar [0v0]	30%	wins iff atk >= 116.31	100%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [1v1]	30%	wins iff atk >= 116.31	100%	named
Vigoroth [1v2]	30%	wins iff atk >= 116.31	100%	named
Shadow Vigoroth [2v2]	30%	wins iff atk >= 116.31	100%	named
Shadow Charjabug [1v1]	72%	wins iff sp >= 1,874,927	88%	named
Clodsire [2v2]	73%	wins iff sp >= 1,873,864	86%	named
Wartortle [0v0]	25%	wins iff sp >= 1,943,861	85%	named
Shadow Hydreigon [1v1]	75%	wins iff def >= 61.14	98%	named
Shadow Malamar [1v2]	23%	wins iff def >= 64.52	94%	named
Vigoroth [2v2]	77%	wins iff atk >= 113.85	98%	named
Medicham [1v1]	78%	wins iff sp >= 1,868,262	91%	named
Furret [1v2]	22%	wins iff sp >= 1,942,526	89%	named
Fearow [2v2]	21%	wins iff sp >= 1,938,289	88%	named
Cramorant [1v2]	21%	wins iff sp >= 1,941,419	89%	named
Lapras [1v2]	19%	wins iff hp >= 272	83%	named
Shadow Vigoroth [1v1]	18%	wins iff def >= 65.32	95%	named
Guzzlord [2v2]	82%	wins iff atk >= 113.35	100%	named
Shadow Forretress [0v0]	83%	wins iff sp >= 1,858,441	92%	named
Shadow Cradily [0v0]	16%	wins iff atk >= 117.34	100%	named
Malamar [1v2]	16%	wins iff atk >= 117.34	100%	named
Hippowdon [1v2]	16%	wins iff atk >= 116.46	86%	named
Wartortle [1v2]	84%	wins iff atk < 117.39	92%	named
Sableye (Mega) [2v2]	15%	wins iff atk >= 117.39	100%	named
Malamar (Mega) [0v0]	85%	wins iff atk >= 113.26	100%	named
Feraligatr [1v1]	85%	wins iff def >= 60.48	98%	named
Hisuian Electrode [1v2]	87%	wins iff def >= 60.17	98%	named
Kingdra [2v2]	13%	wins iff def >= 65.22	97%	named
Shadow Malamar [0v0]	87%	wins iff sp >= 1,857,480	96%	named
Marowak [2v2]	11%	wins iff sp >= 1,954,951	92%	named
Aegislash (Shield) [0v0]	89%	wins iff atk >= 112.91	100%	named
Shadow Hydreigon [2v2]	89%	wins iff sp >= 1,847,987	93%	named
Rillaboom [2v2]	11%	wins iff sp >= 1,969,383	91%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [1v2]	90%	wins iff sp >= 1,845,968	92%	named
Turtonator [1v1]	90%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Bombirdier [0v0]	91%	wins iff atk >= 112.67	100%	named
Lapras [2v2]	93%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Spidops [2v2]	7%	wins iff sp >= 1,976,892	95%	named
Diggersby [0v0]	95%	wins iff sp >= 1,836,820	97%	named
Malamar (Mega) [1v2]	5%	wins iff atk >= 118.55	100%	named
Shadow Sableye [0v0]	96%	wins iff atk < 118.55	99%	named
Clodsire [1v1]	96%	wins iff atk >= 111.80	99%	named
Kingdra [1v1]	97%	wins iff hp >= 255	97%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [0v0]	3%	wins iff sp >= 1,980,957	98%	named
Oinkologne (Female) [0v0]	97%	wins iff sp >= 1,825,568	98%	named
Spidops [1v1]	2%	wins iff atk >= 119.16	99%	named
Empoleon [2v2]	98%	wins iff sp >= 1,828,065	98%	named

Rows are ordered by discriminating power (win rate closest to 50%). "Rule accuracy" is how well that single stat threshold predicts the win/loss across all IVs, and is only shown when it beats always-predicting the majority outcome; high-accuracy UNNAMED rows are candidate new anchors. "Named" means an authored anchor names that opponent (alt-moveset / IV-variant rows inherit their base opponent's anchor).

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1215	117.5	60.6	263	#854-#4096	27.0	-
C1	2881	114.3	63.7	264	#1-#3977	27.5	Marowak [0v0] (+70pp), Annihilape [0v0] (+68pp), Diggersby [1v1] (+68pp), Shadow Charjabug [1v1] (+66pp); trades away Malamar [0v0] (-100pp), Shadow Feraligatr [1v1] (-100pp), Shadow Vigoroth [2v2] (-100pp), Hippowdon [0v0] (-85pp)

Computed at bake time for moveset DRAGON_TAIL / BRUTAL_SWING, DRAGON_CLAW with PvPoke default opponent IVs and bait-selective shield play, over the full opponent pool; this does not follow the scatter's moveset / opponent-IV / bait dropdowns or the opponent filter.

How this works

Per shield scenario: an opponent is contested when between 2% and 98% of this dive's IV spreads beat it (everyone else is settled and can't distinguish IVs). Each IV's fingerprint is its win/loss vector over those opponents; fingerprints are clustered bottom-up (agglomerative, Hamming distance, average linkage). The number of clusters, K, is chosen by silhouette -- a 0-to-1 score of how cleanly the fingerprints separate, where above about 0.5 the clusters are distinct groups and below 0.30 the headline says "weak separation" and the clusters are tendencies rather than tiers -- under a parsimony floor (a split must keep every cluster above a minimum size, and the smallest K in 2-6 within 0.03 of the best silhouette wins). Silhouettes are comparable between the scenarios on this page, not between species. Clusters are ordered weakest to strongest by mean contested wins. The scatter panels project the same 4,096 IV spreads onto each pair of battle stats; clusters that overlap completely in score separate cleanly there. A scenario is reported as degenerate (no clustering attempted) when it has fewer than 6 contested opponents or fewer than 8 distinct win patterns -- on that little data every candidate K scores near-perfectly, which is a measurement artifact and not structure -- and its bits are left out of the all scenarios fingerprint. A scenario that clears the floor but has no split keeping every cluster above the minimum size is reported as fragmented instead, and its bits still count toward the combined view. The all scenarios bits are ordered most-discriminating first, which is the tie-break the linkage uses when several merges are equally close. Replaces the retired score-gap cluster heuristic (2026-07), which usually (~77% of sampled runs) fired on float-level jitter in the opponent-averaged score, and even when it did catch a real tier could not name which matchups defined it.

Evidence

1. Header

Guzzlord -- Great League

DRAGON_TAIL / BRUTAL_SWING, DRAGON_CLAW (arm 1 of 5)

Level view: L50. Bake 2026-09-27. Blob 20260927_223216_Guzzlord_great.replay.pkl.gz.

Opponent pool: 78 entries (Custom pool from gl_top50_plus_cs.txt (75 mons), incl. 2 moveset variant(s)). Grid: 4096 IV spreads x 9 shield scenarios.

Opponent-IV settings baked: PvPoke-default opponent IVs; PvPoke-default opponent IVs, focal never baits; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits.

Rankings snapshot 2026-09-27.

2. Floor

Def >= 64.29 -- 1215 of 4096 spreads (29.7%).

Primitive: ONE-SIDED GATE (sufficient) -- every one of the 1215 spreads at or above the line wins the cell, and 56 of the 2881 below it win it too (98.1% of the spreads below lose, against a bar of 97%). Clearing the line is sufficient here, not necessary.

Mechanism: bulkpoint -- Malamar (Shadow)'s (4/15/15) PSYWAVE drops from 3 to 2 damage into us across the cut.

Decides: 1v1 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 45).

After collapsing pool variants, this cut is owned by one base species (Malamar, rank 45); if it leaves the pool the cut has no owner.

Below the cut: 56 of 2881 spreads win the cell, and they score 381-867. At or above: 1215 of 1215 win, scoring 541-909.

Direction: the cut points the same way in 4 of 4 opponent-IV settings and 5 of 5 moveset arms (win rate at or above it at least 90%, and above the rate below it).

Partition is the stricter question, asked of the SAME printed line: it splits the cell exactly (everything at or above the line wins, everything below it loses) in 2 of 4 settings and 0 of 5 arms. A partition implies the direction test, never the other way round, so this count can never exceed the one above it. Does not partition: pvpoke, rank1.

Separability is a THIRD and non-comparable measurement -- each view's OWN cut, at whatever value it sits: 0 of 5 arms and 2 of 4 settings separate this cell at some value. Per arm -- DRAGON_TAIL / BRUTAL_SWING, DRAGON_CLAW: no clean cut (31.0% win); DRAGON_TAIL / BRUTAL_SWING, CRUNCH: no clean cut (29.6% win); DRAGON_TAIL / BRUTAL_SWING, SLUDGE_BOMB: no clean cut (29.6% win); DRAGON_TAIL / BRUTAL_SWING: no clean cut (29.6% win); DRAGON_TAIL / CRUNCH, DRAGON_CLAW: no clean cut (31.0% win).

The same cell's cut in each setting: pvpoke no clean cut (31.0% win); pvpoke:nobait 64.29; rank1 no clean cut (30.7% win); rank1:nobait 64.29.

Wild catches needed to clear this line: 2 for a 50% chance, 4 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

3. Lines on the other stats

Neither attack nor HP carries a line of its own on this arm: no threshold on either clears every gate with a pool inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

4. Example spreads

Existence proofs; each selection rule is printed with its spread.

rule	IVs	level	Atk / Def / HP	stat product	contested cells	all cells
highest stat product clearing the floor	1/15/15	L19.5	111.49 / 67.25 / 268	100.00% (#1)	73	392
most cells won among clearers with SP >= 95%	1/11/9	L20.0	112.91 / 65.71 / 268	98.96% (#38)	73	392
bulkiest (max Def x HP) among clearers with SP >= 95%	0/15/15	L19.5	110.90 / 67.25 / 268	99.47% (#10)	70	389

Cells won by shield scenario

spread	0v0	0v1	0v2	1v0	1v1	1v2	2v0	2v1	2v2	total
rank-1 1/15/15	40	10	1	67	54	24	71	69	56	392
1/15/15	40	10	1	67	54	24	71	69	56	392
1/11/9	41	10	1	67	54	23	71	69	56	392
0/15/15	40	10	1	67	53	24	71	69	54	389

Clearers reach the CP cap at a median level of L19.5 (1215 of 1215 at L45.0 or below) against L19.5 below the floor (2881 of 2881).

5. Rank-1 check

Stat-product rank-1 is 1/15/15 at L19.5: 111.49 attack / 67.25 Def / 268 HP. It wins 392 of 702 cells (73 of the 107 contested ones).

It already clears the floor; there is no trade to make.

It is not a member of the Alternative target below.

6. Alternative target

HP >= 259, Atk >= 118.54: 200 spreads (4.9%), stat product 89.7% to 94.4% of rank-1, attack 118.55-120.08.

It is built on HP and attack -- the two stats the printed defense line does not use.

2 of the 5 cells it wins with every member are won by at most 1% of the spreads outside the rectangle: 1v0 Araquanid (Shadow) (rank 29; degenerate scenario), 1v2 Malamar (Mega) (mega; not a floor candidate).

Rule: among (HP, Atk) rectangles with at least 100 members and no floor clearer, the one winning the most contested cells the floor cannot (won by every member, by at most 1% of clearers); ties broken by member count. Only cells against a top-50 opponent in a non-degenerate scenario may select it. The printed cuts are the least attained values among the members.

Wins 5 cells with every member that the floor does not: 0v0 Cradily (Shadow) (rank 233), 1v0 Araquanid (Shadow) (rank 29; degenerate scenario), 1v2 Malamar (rank 42), 1v2 Malamar (Mega) (mega; not a floor candidate), 2v2 Sableye (Mega) (mega; not a floor candidate).

Gives up 2 cells the floor guarantees: 0v1 Forretress (rank 53), 1v1 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 45).

No spread satisfies both this rectangle and the defense line.

Wild catches needed to land inside this rectangle: 14 for a 50% chance, 28 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

Members win 355-380 cells in total.

IV envelope of the members -- attack IV 8-15, Def IV 0-5, HP IV 0-15. Members per attack IV: 8: 3, 11: 22, 12: 10, 13: 71, 14: 55, 15: 39.

Highest stat product inside it: 13/3/11 at L19.5 (94.44% of rank-1), 8/0/2 at L20.5 (94.32% of rank-1), 13/4/6 at L19.5 (94.29% of rank-1), 13/4/7 at L19.5 (94.29% of rank-1), 11/2/2 at L20.0 (94.25% of rank-1).

7. Cost

This test finds no reverse single-stat clean cut: no cell on this dive is won by every LOW spread and lost by every high one.

The cost as an exact cell diff -- 1/11/9 (most cells won among clearers with SP >= 95%) against rank-1: 5 cells gained, 5 lost.

Gained, top-20 opponents: 1v1 Clodsire (rank 17).

8. Rungs above

No further clean rung above the floor keeps 25% of the grid.

9. Material clean cuts below the floor

No material rung below the floor.

10. Bulk

No clean Def or HP cut exists on this dive (0 of 107 contested cells on Def, 0 on HP; 23 are attack cuts).

The bulk shape available inside the line -- the highest Def attained at each HP among the spreads clearing it:

Within the clearers, cells won in total run 362-392.

HP	highest Def attained	spreads
249	64.61	1
250	64.61	1
251	64.61	2
252	65.50	19
253	65.50	33
254	65.50	20
255	65.50	37
256	66.38	79
257	66.38	80
258	66.38	35
259	67.25	102
260	67.25	129
261	67.25	93
262	67.51	87
263	67.51	113
264	67.51	125
265	67.25	54
266	67.25	68
267	67.25	69
268	67.25	41
269	65.71	7
270	65.71	12
271	65.71	8

Co-gates inside the floor (every clearer in the sub-rectangle wins the cell; the rate outside it is printed beside): Atk >= 113.35 (589 clearers) wins 2v2 Guzzlord rank 44, against 0.0% without it; Atk >= 113.84 (449 clearers) wins 2v2 Vigoroth rank 21, against 7.2% without it; Atk >= 114.31 (323 clearers) wins 2v2 Lapras rank 39, against 83.7% without it; HP >= 259 (908 clearers) wins 1v2 Umbreon rank 28, against 39.7% without it; HP >= 262 (584 clearers) wins 2v2 Lapras rank 39, against 77.0% without it; HP >= 263 (497 clearers) wins 1v2 Feraligatr rank 30, against 41.8% without it; HP >= 264 (384 clearers) wins 0v0 Cramorant rank 4, against 34.5% without it; HP >= 264 (384 clearers) wins 1v2 Cramorant rank 4, against 27.9% without it; HP >= 264 (384 clearers) wins 1v2 Furret rank 43, against 28.0% without it; HP >= 265 (259 clearers) wins 1v2 Malamar (Shadow) rank 45, against 71.1% without it; HP >= 265 (259 clearers) wins 2v2 Fearow rank 25, against 22.9% without it. These are sufficient conditions, never necessary ones.

11. Coverage

What each of Malamar (Shadow)'s own 4096 spreads asks of our defense: the lowest attainable value that holds its PSYWAVE to 2 damage (from 3).

"held" is the share of that species' own grid whose attack is at or below the row's, and so is held by the same value: the damage it does to us is its attack over our defense, so its IV grid traces out the ladder the same way an attacker's does.

The column is not monotone, and that is a CP-cap effect rather than a transcription error: under the cap a hundo sits at a lower level than a low-attack spread, so it carries less attack. The highest-attack Malamar (Shadow) is 15/0/0.

No spread of ours reaches the value the max-attack Malamar (3 spreads) asks for at all.

opponent build	defense you need	held	focal clearers
rank-1 (0/15/9)	64.29	3.8%	1215
PvPoke default (4/15/15)	64.29	5.8%	1215
10/10/10 (raid/research floor)	65.71	41.5%	423
grid median	66.06	52.1%	310
hundo (15/15/15)	66.06	46.3%	310
12/12/12 (lucky trade)	65.71	37.4%	423
the max-attack Malamar (3 spreads)	-	100.0%	0

"focal" is the count of our spreads at or above that value. The printed floor is the PvPoke-default row; it is the line every reference tool quotes, not a guarantee against every build of that species.

12. Mirror

Against the pool's own Guzzlord entry. Seat: our side is the optimised row; the mirror opponent always baits.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 4096 3001 0 4096 4096 0 4096 4096 3977.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 4096 0 0 4096 2969 0 4096 4096 0.

shields	win rate below the floor	win rate at/above	win rate over the whole grid
0v0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
0v1	39.8%	47.5%	42.1%
0v2	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
1v0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
1v1	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
1v2	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
2v0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
2v1	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
2v2	96.7%	48.5%	82.4%

13. Changes the score, not the matchup

Cells won (or lost) by every spread where the battle score still steps by at least 60 at one attainable attack value.

Ordered by how close the step comes to the win line (500), nearest first: the question this field answers is how close a cell is to becoming a matchup, not how large the swing inside it is.

12 of 36 steps are listed, closest to the win line first; 24 more are not.

value	cell	rank	score step	points from 500	outcome
Atk >= 117.94	0v1 Blastoise	rank 58	415 -> 480	20 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 117.03	0v0 Vigoroth	rank 21	386 -> 475	25 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 120.07	0v1 Sableye	rank 36	396 -> 472	28 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 114.91	2v2 Snorlax (Shadow)	rank 40	555 -> 875	55 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 117.33	1v1 Malamar	rank 42	885 -> 579	79 (closing)	won on both sides
Atk >= 116.79	1v1 Malamar (Mega)	unranked	885 -> 583	83 (closing)	won on both sides
Atk >= 113.25	2v2 Malamar (Mega)	unranked	585 -> 875	85 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 113.70	0v0 Turtonator	rank 64	589 -> 840	89 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 115.87	1v2 Ninetales	rank 13	591 -> 654	91 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 120.07	2v2 Sableye (Shadow)	rank 18	595 -> 767	95 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 117.33	1v0 Cradily (Shadow)	rank 233	598 -> 787	98 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 120.07	2v0 Melmetal	rank 1	608 -> 912	108 (widening)	won on both sides

14. Not claimed

83 of 107 contested matchups have no clean single-stat rule and are not claimed.

6 of 57 top-50 matchups are listed, one per base species and closest to an even split first; 51 more are not.

cell	rank	win rate inside the floor
1v2 Cramorant	rank 4	50.7%
1v2 Furret	rank 43	50.8%
1v1 Vigoroth (Shadow)	rank 37	51.5%
0v1 Guzzlord	rank 44	47.5%
2v1 Melmetal	rank 1	44.3%
2v2 Fearow	rank 25	39.3%

15. How sure

23 clean attack cuts, 0 on Def, 0 on HP, over 107 contested cells (319 cells are won by every spread, 276 lost by every spread).

Scenarios barred from carrying a floor -- fewer than 6 contested cells, or fewer than 8 distinct opponent columns among them; the dive page's "degenerate" flag applies the same two numbers to its own stricter counts, so it can flag a different set: 0v2 (3 contested, 4 distinct opponent columns), 1v0 (3 contested, 5 distinct opponent columns), 2v0 (0 contested, 2 distinct opponent columns), 2v1 (4 contested, 6 distinct opponent columns).

The printed floor is a one-sided gate, not an exact cut: in its own setting it leaves 56 of 4096 spreads on the wrong side of it. The partition counts below are measured on that same line, so they are counts of settings where it happens to be exact.

The printed floor partitions its cell exactly in 2 of 4 opponent-IV settings and 0 of 5 arms; its direction survives in 4 and 5 of them. Separately, and not comparably, the cell has a clean cut at SOME value in 2 settings and 0 arms.

It is owned by one base species (Malamar); if it leaves the pool the floor has no owner.

Both baked opponent cohorts sit low in Malamar (Shadow)'s own attack grid (3.8% and 5.8% of it at or below them, and so held by the same value), so "2 of 4 settings" is not robustness against attack-weighted opponent builds; the coverage ladder is.

The same cell has no clean cut in the level-51 view.

Independent check: the dive page's matchup clusters, under "Why these regions", which partition this same grid by whole win/loss fingerprint across all 4 non-degenerate shield scenarios, splits it on attack (at 116.26), not defense -- the two methods do not agree on this dive (K=2, silhouette 0.48).

Not measured here: opponent IVs outside the baked cohorts, post-match HP and shields, XL or dust cost, and any live-game check of the priority convention.

16. Provenance

Every threshold in this section is one of three things, and each is badged where it is printed. An EXACT clean cut: every spread at or above it wins the named cell and no spread below it does. A ONE-SIDED GATE: one side is pure and the other is at least 97% pure -- either nothing below it wins (clearing it is necessary) or everything at or above it wins (clearing it is sufficient). A NEAR-EXACT split: at most 0.5% of the grid sits on the wrong side of it in total. The win predicate is gopvpsim.battle.is_win (score > 500; 500 itself is a tie, not a win).

That is stricter than the two numbers the dive page prints for the same opponent: the Threats "flips at" boundary (a 75/25 gate, so spreads on the passing side can still lose) and the Matchup clusters flip table's single-stat split for that one opponent (the most accurate such split, misclassifications allowed). The cluster line in "How sure" above is a third thing again: not one opponent but the stat rule that reproduces that section's "all scenarios" partition of the whole grid.

Priority ties: the coverage ladder counts an exact attack tie as NOT beaten. The engine is seat-dependent on an exact tie, so a tied line is not a guarantee in either direction.

Ranks and opponent builds are read live from the 2026-09-27 rankings snapshot and the current gamemaster; this blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so the render is a function of the blob plus those two live reads.

Auto-derived: this section is generated by scripts/deep_dive_brief.py from the replay blob. No human prose is in it.

How the line was selected (gates and guards)

Decision band for the floor (D1): the lowest ELIGIBLE rung whose clearer pool sits inside [25%, 60%] of the grid. Materiality band for a rung: [10%, 90%].

To be ELIGIBLE AS THE FLOOR -- not to be listed as a rung -- a cut needs at least 20 attack/20 defense/5 HP distinct attainable values below it, an opponent of rank 50 or better outside the caveat list, a non-degenerate shield scenario, a win rate at or above the cut of at least 90% in every setting, and a closed-form mechanism. Listing is a weaker bar: a rung is printed when it keeps 25% of the grid (above the floor) or sits in the materiality band (below it) AND points the same way in at least 2 settings, so a listed rung may be unattributed, low-ranked or 2-of-4.

A cut can fail several gates at once, so the failure tally below sums to more than the number of cuts.

Co-gate sub-rectangles need 5% of the grid; the alternative target needs 100 members; a score-only step needs 60 points. These constants are calibrated on one species and are parameters of the stage that uses them, not tuned per dive.

Floor pool by primitive on the defense axis -- the axis the cross-stat rule selected -- each selected on its own under the same band and the same gates: exact -> no candidate in the band; one-sided gate -> Def >= 64.29 (1v1 Malamar (Shadow), 29.7%); near-exact -> no candidate in the band. Selected: the one-sided gate at Def >= 64.29. Selection takes the lowest eligible rung in the band; a stronger primitive within 0.50 stat points of it wins the tie, in the order exact, one-sided gate, near-exact. A gate needs 97% of its dirty side pointing the right way; a near-exact split needs at most 0.5% of the grid on the wrong side. Only exact rungs merge, in either direction.

Degradation ladder: rung reached = floor.

Of 23 clean cuts, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-direction 23, G-rank 11, G-material-gap 7, G-material-lo 5, G-material-hi 4, G-scenario 2.

Of 105 one-sided gate and near-exact candidates, 1 clears every gate. Gate failures: G-attributed 86, G-material-hi 83, G-material-gap 83, G-direction 64, G-rank 23, G-material-lo 20, G-scenario 9.

Floor cell in pvpoke: no clean cut, 31.0% win

Floor cell in pvpoke:nobait: clean cut 64.29, 1215 spreads

Floor cell in rank1: no clean cut, 30.7% win

Floor cell in rank1:nobait: clean cut 64.29, 1215 spreads

Floor cell on arm 'DRAGON_TAIL / BRUTAL_SWING, DRAGON_CLAW': no clean cut, 31.0% win

Floor cell on arm 'DRAGON_TAIL / BRUTAL_SWING, CRUNCH': no clean cut, 29.6% win

Floor cell on arm 'DRAGON_TAIL / BRUTAL_SWING, SLUDGE_BOMB': no clean cut, 29.6% win

Floor cell on arm 'DRAGON_TAIL / BRUTAL_SWING': no clean cut, 29.6% win

Floor cell on arm 'DRAGON_TAIL / CRUNCH, DRAGON_CLAW': no clean cut, 31.0% win

Closest dirty thresholds on cells with no clean rule: 1v2 Charjabug Atk >= 115.29 (2 spreads on the wrong side); 0v0 Hippowdon Atk >= 116.45 (408 spreads on the wrong side); 0v0 Annihilape Def >= 61.69 (501 spreads on the wrong side); 2v2 Malamar (Shadow) Def >= 64.29 (744 spreads on the wrong side).

band	defense line it selects	cell
[25%, 60%]	64.29	1v1 Malamar (Shadow)
[25%, 55%]	64.29	1v1 Malamar (Shadow)
[25%, 50%]	64.29	1v1 Malamar (Shadow)
[20%, 60%]	64.29	1v1 Malamar (Shadow)
[30%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 70%]	64.29	1v1 Malamar (Shadow)

Terms used here

build criteria: Which shield scenarios the ranking counts: all nine equally, the three even ones, or 1v1 alone.
build: A region of the IV grid you can aim at -- every spread that clears the same combination of thresholds, at least fifty of them.
guaranteed: Won by every single spread in the region, not by most of them.
decision matchup: A (shield scenario, opponent) pair the IV choice decides: a top-50 opponent that some spreads on this grid beat and others lose to.
opponent-IV mode: One of the ways every opponent was made for this bake -- PvPoke-default IVs or the bulkiest ones, each with and without the focal side baiting -- so a claim that holds in all of them does not depend on how the opponent was made.
bulk box: A rule that is a defense floor and an HP floor and nothing else -- a rectangle on the defense / HP plane.
stat-product rank-1 (SP1): The IV spread with the largest attack x defense x HP at this league's CP cap -- the bulk-first spread most IV tools list first. Written SP1 where it is named repeatedly.
material: A matchup no single-stat threshold of a hundred or more spreads wins more than 95% of the time, so it takes two stats at once to claim it.
stat product: Attack x defense x HP at the league's CP cap, the usual one-number summary of an IV spread.
wide: The looser rule drawn around a region of the grid: it holds every spread that region holds and more, so it wins less for every member but is easier to hit.
fork: A second region with no spread in common with the first that wins a noticeably different set of matchups outright -- the two overlap on less than 80% of them -- so they are a real choice rather than two spellings of one.
outside rate: How often the spreads left OUT of a region win the same matchup its own members all win -- one the rest of the grid takes anyway is not what you bought.
charge-move priority (CMP): When both sides throw a charged move on the same turn, the higher attack stat goes first.
contested matchups: The matchups some IV spreads on this grid win and others lose -- the only ones an IV choice can change.
rung: An attack value above the line at which some further matchup flips for every spread that reaches it.
UpSet plot: A bar chart of set intersections: each column is one candidate region, and the dots under it mark which named sets it lies inside (Lex et al. 2014).
bulkpoint: A defense value across which an opponent's damage into you steps down by a whole point, or an HP value across which the number of hits they need to knock you out changes.
one-sided gate: A stat value with one clean side: either nothing below it wins the matchup, or everything at or above it does -- so clearing it is required, or enough, but not both.

Moveset: Switching movesets reloads the page; pasted CSV will need to be re-loaded. Shields: Build criteria: Opponent IVs: Bait: Y-axis: Color: Anchors: Build criteria weights shield scenarios in: Which one to build?, the all-scenarios clusters, and Shields = All (by build criteria). Nothing else on this page is re-weighted by it. Threshold tiers (e.g. GH Great / GH Good) are expert stat-cutoff regions defined in Threshold Tiers below. Hover legend to isolate; click to lock.

Check my collection - Your collection stays in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Paste your Poke Genie CSV export below, or click Choose file… to load one from disk. You’ll see which of your Guzzlords (and pre-evolutions) qualify for each tier, overlaid on the scatter plot.

Show only my mons

Or enter one at a time - Atk/Def/HP IVs (0-15), level, shadow flag. Same format as PvPoke / PvPIVs.

Species Atk Def HP Level Shadow

Compare candidates - up to 7 of your IV spreads, side by side: wins, mirror, and the close calls that decide the build

Add a spread: Atk Def HP 0 / 7 added

Highlight IVs:

Top IVs Rows: Ranked by this dive's battle simulation (not fetched from PvPoke). Click any column header to sort.

Battle-Rating Distribution

Per-matchup battle-rating distribution for the reference IV (PvPoke default or Rank 1, matching the Opponent-IVs dropdown) across the opponent pool, under the currently-selected Shields / Opponent-IVs / Bait.

Dragon Tail / Brutal Swing, Dragon Claw

IV Recommendations

Moveset: Dragon Tail / Brutal Swing, Dragon Claw. Vs PvPoke default opponents.

IV Flavor Guide (Simulation)

Auto-generated from simulation matchup data. Flavor names (e.g. "Premium Bulk", "Fortified {Opp}", "{Opp} Slayer") are derived from which opponents each IV cluster beats, not from the expert-authored Threshold Tiers section above. This IV Flavor Guide and the Threshold Tiers answer different questions and may not line up 1:1. New to flavor cards? The IV Flavor Guide walks through the six name families and the trade-off layout.

In Great League, Guzzlord has 4 flavors: General Good, Fortified Vigoroth, Cradily Slayer, and Guzzlord Mirror Atk. In general, the General Good variation may be the flavor of choice, as it plays up Guzzlord's potential vs Annihilape, Araquanid, Blastoise, among others.

Flavor	IVs	%	Catches needed
General Good [Recommended]	3444	84.1%	almost any will do
Fortified Vigoroth	1	0.0%	very rare
Cradily Slayer	3	0.1%	very rare
Guzzlord Mirror Atk	2582	63.0%	almost any will do

General Good (110.70 Atk, 58.24 Def, 259 HP) [Recommended]

58.24 Def and 259 HP is a safe baseline for Guzzlord, with an attack floor of 110.70 Atk for coverage against key opponents.

259 HP is also a safe spot, enabling key matchups vs Charjabug, Clodsire, Cradily.

58.40 Def with 264+ HP for Cradily (2v2), Diggersby (0v0, 1v1), Electrode (Hisuian) (1v2), Feraligatr (1v1), Forretress (incl. Shadow) (0v0, 0v1), Hydreigon (incl. Shadow) (1v1, 2v2), Malamar (incl. Shadow) (0v0), Mantine (2v2), Medicham (1v1), Oinkologne (Female) (0v0), Wartortle (1v2), Blastoise (1v2), Fearow (1v1), Ninetales (incl. Shadow) (0v1), Rillaboom (1v1), Charjabug (incl. Shadow) (1v1), Clodsire (2v2), Quagsire (incl. Shadow) (0v0, 2v2), Turtonator (0v1), Spidops (2v1)
58.81 Def for the Araquanid (1v0)
58.99 Def for the Sableye (incl. Shadow) (1v1 no bait)
59.14 Def for Guzzlord (0v1, 1v1), Marowak (0v0), Hippowdon (2v2), Rillaboom (1v1)
59.39 Def for Charjabug (incl. Shadow) (1v1), Clodsire (2v2), Rillaboom (1v1)
59.58 Def for Medicham (1v1), Umbreon (1v2)
59.74 Def with 259+ HP for Araquanid (incl. Shadow) (2v1), Hippowdon (incl. Shadow) (1v1), Snorlax (incl. Shadow) (2v2)
59.88 Def with 262+ HP for the Cradily (incl. Shadow) (1v1)

Fortified Vigoroth (67.46 Def, 264 HP)

The "Fortified Vigoroth" Guzzlord fortifies its bulk to gain several matchups including the Vigoroth 2v2, the Vigoroth (Shadow) 1v1, the Annihilape (Shadow) 2v1. This requires 67.46 Def with 264 HP.

Note: The higher stat requirement will cost several matchups, such as the Aegislash (Shield) 0v0, Bombirdier 0v0, Charjabug (Shadow) 2v2, among others.

Cradily Slayer (119.93 Atk, 262 HP)

The "Cradily Slayer" Guzzlord trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Cradily 1v1, the Cradily (Shadow) 0v0, the Aegislash (Shield) 0v0. Guzzlord would need 119.93 Atk while maintaining 262 HP.

Note: The drop in bulk will cost several matchups, such as the Blastoise 1v2, Charjabug (Shadow) 1v1, Clodsire 2v2, among others.

Guzzlord Mirror Atk (114.48 Atk, 249 HP)

The "Guzzlord Mirror Atk" Guzzlord trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Charjabug 1v2, the Corviknight 1v0, the Dondozo 1v1. Guzzlord would need 114.48 Atk while maintaining 249 HP.

Note: The drop in bulk will cost several matchups, such as the Cradily (Shadow) 1v1, Feraligatr 1v2, and Umbreon 1v2.

Rank-1 Guzzlord (1/15/15) meets the General Good thresholds.

Simulation-Derived IV Tiers

Auto-derived from the sim (not expert-authored).

Threshold Tiers

Stat-target headlines from thresholds/*.toml, each grouped with the named anchors its spec clears and the IV spreads that meet it. Within each tier card, bullets are grouped by opponent and sorted by the required stat (Def or Atk) ascending - read top-to-bottom in the order a player would clear them as their stat grows. The flat list of every anchor (regardless of tier) lives in Anchor-Driven Matchup Flips below. New to tier cards? The Threshold Tiers guide walks through what the stat cutoffs and member counts mean. A tier's anchors come from two passes over the anchor list:

Primary bullets - the tier has a cutoff on the anchor's target axis (atk or def) that meets or exceeds the anchor's threshold. Consequences:
- Subset case: if tier A is strictly stricter than tier B on the anchor axis, A's bullet list is a superset of B's. Overlap is intentional.
- Crossed-cutoff case: tier A has only an atk cutoff, tier B has only a def cutoff - neither is a subset of the other. Atk anchors appear only on A; def anchors only on B.
- Slayer-axis IV-count case: two tiers can list the same atk anchor but have different member-IV counts because a stricter tier's def cutoff excludes def-sacrificing spreads that the looser tier keeps. Check the (−N vs parent) callout on the tier header to spot this at a glance.
Anchors we get for free (collapsed) - the tier has no cutoff on the anchor's target axis, but every IV in the tier clears the anchor's threshold anyway. These would be silently dropped by the primary filter; we surface them in a separate collapsed block so the card isn't misleading.

Cradily Slayer · atk≥119.93, hp≥262 (3 IV spreads) (−49 vs Fearow Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 84 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Aegislash (Shield), Annihilape, Shadow Annihilape, Shadow Araquanid, +33 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Cradily (1 scenario flip).

115.24 Atk for Melmetal (Brutal Swing) vs Melmetal (2v1)
115.13 Atk for Ninetales (Dragon Claw) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
115.85 Atk for Ninetales (Dragon Tail) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
116.91 Atk for Ninetales (Brutal Swing) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
111.28 Atk for Clodsire (Dragon Claw) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.63 Atk for Clodsire (Brutal Swing) vs Clodsire (1v1)
119.38 Atk for Clodsire (Dragon Tail) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.35 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1, 2v2)
111.51 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
115.18 Atk for Stunfisk (Brutal Swing) vs Stunfisk (1v2 no bait)
115.73 Atk for Stunfisk (Dragon Claw) vs Stunfisk (0v1, 1v2)
111.55 Atk for Vigoroth (Dragon Claw) vs Vigoroth (1v2, 2v2 with bait)
111.71 Atk for Vigoroth (Brutal Swing) vs Vigoroth (1v2, 2v2 with bait)
113.78 Atk for Vigoroth (Dragon Tail) vs Vigoroth (2v2 with bait)
119.22 Atk for Fearow (Dragon Tail) vs Fearow (2v2)
119.49 Atk for Fearow (Brutal Swing) vs Fearow (2v2)
118.33 Atk for Shadow Araquanid (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Araquanid (1v0)
118.54 Atk for Shadow Araquanid (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Araquanid (1v0)
115.26 Atk for Shadow Vigoroth (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Vigoroth (2v2)
115.81 Atk for Shadow Vigoroth (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Vigoroth (2v2)
114.72 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v2)
115.22 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v2)
114.50 Atk for Charjabug (Dragon Claw) vs Charjabug (1v2 with bait)
115.22 Atk for Charjabug (Dragon Tail) vs Charjabug (1v2 with bait)
116.26 Atk for Charjabug (Brutal Swing) vs Charjabug (0v0, 1v2)
115.82 Atk for Malamar (Dragon Claw) vs Malamar (0v0, 1v2)
116.23 Atk for Malamar (Dragon Tail) vs Malamar (0v0)
116.84 Atk for Malamar (Brutal Swing) vs Malamar (0v0, 1v2)
110.88 Atk for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (2v2 with bait)
111.17 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
111.76 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Tail) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
116.00 Atk for Hippowdon (Dragon Claw) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
116.42 Atk for Hippowdon (Dragon Tail) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
117.02 Atk for Hippowdon (Brutal Swing) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
116.01 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1 with bait)
116.29 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1 with bait)
110.88 Atk for Sableye Mega (Dragon Claw) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0, 2v2)
111.36 Atk for Sableye Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0, 2v2)
117.34 Atk for Sableye Mega (Dragon Tail) vs Sableye (Mega) (2v2 with bait)
111.14 Atk for Malamar Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
112.49 Atk for Malamar Mega (Dragon Claw) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0, 1v2)
113.20 Atk for Malamar Mega (Dragon Tail) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
110.81 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Claw) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.20 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Tail) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.78 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Brutal Swing) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
112.79 Atk for Aegislash Shield (Brutal Swing) vs Aegislash (Shield) (0v0)
110.70 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2)
110.88 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2 with bait)
111.13 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2)
115.04 Atk for Toxapex (Brutal Swing) vs Toxapex (0v0)
115.04 Atk for Toxapex (Dragon Claw) vs Toxapex (0v0)
110.79 Atk for Turtonator (Dragon Claw) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)
111.01 Atk for Turtonator (Brutal Swing) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)
119.93 Atk for Cradily (Dragon Tail) vs Cradily (1v1)
118.12 Atk for Wartortle (Dragon Claw) vs Wartortle (0v0)
118.86 Atk for Wartortle (Dragon Tail) vs Wartortle (0v0)
110.78 Atk for Bombirdier (Dragon Claw) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
116.83 Atk for Bombirdier (Dragon Tail) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
117.99 Atk for Bombirdier (Brutal Swing) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
117.20 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0)
118.05 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0)
112.23 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
112.64 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
113.22 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
117.05 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Tail) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
117.66 Atk for Feraligatr (Brutal Swing) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
118.52 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Claw) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
118.53 Atk for Shadow Annihilape (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1 no bait)
119.42 Atk for Shadow Annihilape (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1 no bait)
111.61 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
112.01 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
112.60 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
113.94 Atk for Corviknight (Dragon Claw) vs Corviknight (1v0)
111.96 Atk for Quagsire (Dragon Claw) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.36 Atk for Quagsire (Dragon Tail) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.94 Atk for Quagsire (Brutal Swing) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.13 Atk for Mantine (Dragon Claw) vs Mantine (1v1)
112.62 Atk for Mantine (Brutal Swing) vs Mantine (1v1)
114.72 Atk for Snorlax (Dragon Claw) vs Snorlax (0v0)
112.80 Atk for Annihilape (Brutal Swing) vs Annihilape (1v0)
112.96 Atk for Annihilape (Dragon Claw) vs Annihilape (1v0)
114.32 Atk for Dondozo (Dragon Claw) vs Dondozo (1v1 with bait)
115.11 Atk for Dondozo (Brutal Swing) vs Dondozo (1v1)
110.79 Atk for Shadow Hydreigon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hydreigon (2v2)

Anchors we get for free (124 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

58.29 Def + 254 HP for Clodsire bulk (Stone Edge) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.29 Def + 256 HP for Clodsire bulk (Water Pulse) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.46 Def + 253 HP for Clodsire bulk (Megahorn) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.53 Def + 254 HP for Clodsire bulk (Earthquake) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.72 Def + 255 HP for Clodsire bulk (Sludge Bomb) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.44 Def for Mantine bulk (Ice Beam) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.45 Def for Mantine bulk (Bubble Beam) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.63 Def for Mantine bulk (Twister) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.78 Def for Mantine bulk (Water Pulse) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.78 Def for Mantine bulk (Bubble) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.78 Def for Mantine bulk (Wing Attack) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.78 Def for Mantine bulk (Aerial Ace) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.27 Def for Feraligatr bulk (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1)
58.59 Def for Feraligatr bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v1)
58.71 Def for Feraligatr bulk (Crunch) vs Feraligatr (1v1)
58.92 Def for Feraligatr bulk (Hydro Cannon) vs Feraligatr (1v1)
58.35 Def for Hisuian Electrode bulk (Wild Charge) vs Hisuian Electrode (1v2)
58.64 Def for Hisuian Electrode bulk (Energy Ball) vs Hisuian Electrode (1v2)
58.77 Def for Hisuian Electrode bulk (Swift) vs Hisuian Electrode (1v2)
58.45 Def + 278 HP for Shadow Vigoroth bulk (Body Slam) vs Shadow Vigoroth (1v1 with bait)
58.50 Def + 278 HP for Shadow Vigoroth bulk (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Vigoroth (1v1 with bait)
58.50 Def + 278 HP for Shadow Vigoroth bulk (Brick Break) vs Shadow Vigoroth (1v1 with bait)
58.62 Def + 278 HP for Shadow Vigoroth bulk (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Vigoroth (1v1 with bait)
58.25 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.32 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.32 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.50 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.58 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.71 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.79 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Ice Shard) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.88 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Surf) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.36 Def for Shadow Malamar bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Malamar bulk (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0)
58.64 Def for Shadow Malamar bulk (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0)
58.82 Def for Shadow Malamar bulk (Psybeam) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Forretress bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Forretress bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.47 Def for Shadow Forretress bulk (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.86 Def for Shadow Forretress bulk (Sand Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.95 Def for Shadow Forretress bulk (Mirror Shot) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.24 Def for Forretress bulk (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.57 Def for Forretress bulk (Sand Tomb) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.71 Def for Forretress bulk (Struggle Bug) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.76 Def for Forretress bulk (Heavy Slam) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.76 Def for Forretress bulk (Mirror Shot) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.80 Def for Forretress bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.30 Def for Medicham bulk (Dynamic Punch) vs Medicham (1v1)
58.52 Def for Medicham bulk (Ice Punch) vs Medicham (1v1)
58.38 Def for Shadow Hydreigon bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1, 2v2)
58.38 Def for Shadow Hydreigon bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1, 2v2)
58.41 Def for Shadow Hydreigon bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1)
58.42 Def for Shadow Hydreigon bulk (Dark Pulse) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1)
58.56 Def for Shadow Hydreigon bulk (Fly) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1)
58.34 Def for Diggersby bulk (Fire Punch) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.34 Def for Diggersby bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.57 Def for Diggersby bulk (Earthquake) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.57 Def for Diggersby bulk (Scorching Sands) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.73 Def for Diggersby bulk (Dig) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.40 Def + 278 HP for Spidops bulk (Lunge) vs Spidops (2v2)
58.46 Def + 278 HP for Spidops bulk (X-Scissor) vs Spidops (2v2)
58.81 Def + 278 HP for Spidops bulk (Grass Knot) vs Spidops (2v2)
58.81 Def + 278 HP for Spidops bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Spidops (2v2)
58.45 Def + 264 HP for Cradily bulk (Grass Knot) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.63 Def + 264 HP for Cradily bulk (Acid) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.63 Def + 264 HP for Cradily bulk (Stone Edge) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.63 Def + 264 HP for Cradily bulk (Rock Slide) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.63 Def + 264 HP for Cradily bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.84 Def + 264 HP for Cradily bulk (Bulldoze) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.29 Def for Wartortle bulk (Aqua Jet) vs Wartortle (1v2)
58.29 Def for Wartortle bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Wartortle (1v2)
58.56 Def for Wartortle bulk (Ice Beam) vs Wartortle (1v2)
58.36 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Heat Wave) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.39 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Overheat) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.47 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Flamethrower) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.50 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Solar Beam) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.51 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Scorching Sands) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.55 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Fire Blast) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.70 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Energy Ball) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
59.05 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.92 Def for Shadow Sableye bulk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1 no bait)
58.99 Def for Shadow Sableye bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1 no bait)
59.10 Def for Shadow Sableye bulk (Foul Play) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1 no bait)
58.27 Def for Fearow bulk (Sky Attack) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.36 Def for Fearow bulk (Twister) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.36 Def for Fearow bulk (Drill Peck) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.60 Def for Fearow bulk (Aerial Ace) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.60 Def for Fearow bulk (Fly) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.65 Def for Fearow bulk (Drill Run) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.24 Def for Rillaboom bulk (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (1v1 no bait)
58.24 Def for Blastoise bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.30 Def for Blastoise bulk (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.30 Def for Blastoise bulk (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.24 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.34 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Sludge Bomb) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.35 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Mud Bomb) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.39 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.46 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Drain Punch) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0)
58.68 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Aqua Tail) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0)
58.46 Def for Araquanid bulk (Water Pulse) vs Araquanid (1v0)
58.46 Def for Araquanid bulk (Bug Buzz) vs Araquanid (1v0)
58.46 Def for Shadow Charjabug bulk (Crunch) vs Shadow Charjabug (1v1 with bait)
58.50 Def for Shadow Charjabug bulk (X-Scissor) vs Shadow Charjabug (1v1 with bait)
58.62 Def for Shadow Charjabug bulk (Discharge) vs Shadow Charjabug (1v1 with bait)
58.75 Def for Shadow Charjabug bulk (Volt Switch) vs Shadow Charjabug (1v1 with bait)
58.24 Def for Turtonator bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.27 Def for Turtonator bulk (Incinerate) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.41 Def for Turtonator bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.44 Def for Turtonator bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.51 Def for Turtonator bulk (Overheat) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.61 Def for Turtonator bulk (Flamethrower) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
59.00 Def for Turtonator bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Feint Attack) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Shadow Claw) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Foul Play) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.38 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.51 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Power Gem) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.57 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Drain Punch) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.26 Def + 254 HP for Hippowdon bulk (Earth Power) vs Hippowdon (2v2 no bait)
58.44 Def + 254 HP for Hippowdon bulk (Body Slam) vs Hippowdon (2v2 no bait)
58.47 Def + 254 HP for Hippowdon bulk (Earthquake) vs Hippowdon (2v2 no bait)
58.47 Def + 254 HP for Hippowdon bulk (Scorching Sands) vs Hippowdon (2v2 no bait)
58.54 Def + 254 HP for Hippowdon bulk (Stone Edge) vs Hippowdon (2v2 no bait)
58.85 Def + 254 HP for Hippowdon bulk (Weather Ball (Rock)) vs Hippowdon (2v2 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

119.16 Atk flips Spidops (1v1 with bait) [107 IVs]
119.16 Atk + 262 HP flips Spidops (2v2 with bait) [66 IVs]
114.31 Atk flips Mandibuzz (0v1) [2812 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Marowak (2v2)
vs Mimikyu (1v0)

Member IVs (3)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/0/2 👑	120.08	59.14	264	#1799	+0	+0.5	-36.2	+1.0
13/0/1	120.08	59.14	263	#2083	+0	-0.8	-37.0	-1.9
13/0/0	120.08	59.14	262	#2424	+0	-2.4	-38.2	-2.9

Fortified Vigoroth · def≥67.46, hp≥264 (1 IV spread) (−4088 vs General (def-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 311 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Annihilape, Shadow Annihilape, Araquanid, Shadow Araquanid, +45 more. Bulkpoint(s) vs Vigoroth (1 scenario flip).

58.36 Def + 263 HP for Shadow Ninetales (Heat Wave) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
58.39 Def + 262 HP for Shadow Ninetales (Overheat) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
58.47 Def + 263 HP for Shadow Ninetales (Flamethrower) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
58.50 Def + 262 HP for Shadow Ninetales (Solar Beam) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
58.51 Def + 263 HP for Shadow Ninetales (Scorching Sands) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
58.55 Def + 262 HP for Shadow Ninetales (Fire Blast) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
58.70 Def + 262 HP for Shadow Ninetales (Energy Ball) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
59.05 Def + 263 HP for Shadow Ninetales (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
60.99 Def + 263 HP for Shadow Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
66.92 Def for Shadow Ninetales (Feint Attack) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
66.92 Def for Shadow Ninetales (Ember) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
66.92 Def for Shadow Ninetales (Fire Spin) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
61.97 Def + 257 HP for Cramorant (Hydro Pump) vs Cramorant (0v0, 1v2)
62.02 Def + 256 HP for Cramorant (Fly) vs Cramorant (0v0, 1v2)
62.44 Def + 258 HP for Cramorant (Surf) vs Cramorant (0v0, 1v2)
62.88 Def + 258 HP for Cramorant (Dive) vs Cramorant (0v0, 1v2)
63.05 Def + 261 HP for Cramorant (Peck) vs Cramorant (0v0, 1v2)
58.46 Def for Araquanid (Water Pulse) vs Araquanid (1v0)
58.46 Def + 254 HP for Araquanid (Bug Buzz) vs Araquanid (1v0)
59.38 Def + 254 HP for Araquanid (Bubble Beam) vs Araquanid (1v0)
59.85 Def for Araquanid (Mirror Coat) vs Araquanid (1v0)
60.80 Def + 254 HP for Araquanid (Infestation) vs Araquanid (1v0)
60.80 Def + 254 HP for Araquanid (Bug Bite) vs Araquanid (1v0)
58.29 Def + 253 HP for Clodsire (Stone Edge) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.29 Def + 256 HP for Clodsire (Water Pulse) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.46 Def + 253 HP for Clodsire (Megahorn) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.53 Def + 253 HP for Clodsire (Earthquake) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.72 Def + 254 HP for Clodsire (Sludge Bomb) vs Clodsire (2v2)
59.31 Def for Clodsire (Poison Sting) vs Clodsire (2v2)
59.31 Def for Clodsire (Acid Spray) vs Clodsire (2v2)
59.27 Def + 261 HP for Marowak (Dig) vs Marowak (0v0, 2v2)
59.32 Def + 261 HP for Marowak (Earthquake) vs Marowak (0v0, 2v2)
59.39 Def + 263 HP for Marowak (Rock Slide) vs Marowak (0v0, 2v2)
59.54 Def + 254 HP for Marowak (Bone Club) vs Marowak (0v0, 2v2)
60.36 Def + 265 HP for Marowak (Rock Smash) vs Marowak (0v0, 2v2)
62.71 Def + 266 HP for Marowak (Mud Slap) vs Marowak (2v2)
60.69 Def + 267 HP for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (0v0)
60.76 Def + 267 HP for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (0v0)
61.03 Def + 267 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (0v0)
61.03 Def + 277 HP for Empoleon (Metal Claw) vs Empoleon (0v0)
61.03 Def + 267 HP for Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Empoleon (0v0)
61.03 Def + 277 HP for Empoleon (Metal Sound) vs Empoleon (0v0)
61.03 Def + 267 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (0v0)
65.47 Def + 267 HP for Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Empoleon (0v0)
63.96 Def + 267 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
64.13 Def + 267 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
64.33 Def + 267 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
64.38 Def + 268 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
64.48 Def + 267 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
65.10 Def + 269 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Metal Claw) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
65.10 Def + 269 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Metal Sound) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
67.13 Def + 267 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
58.27 Def + 258 HP for Fearow (Sky Attack) vs Fearow (1v1, 2v2)
58.36 Def + 259 HP for Fearow (Twister) vs Fearow (1v1, 2v2)
58.36 Def + 259 HP for Fearow (Drill Peck) vs Fearow (1v1, 2v2)
58.60 Def + 258 HP for Fearow (Aerial Ace) vs Fearow (1v1, 2v2)
58.60 Def + 258 HP for Fearow (Fly) vs Fearow (1v1, 2v2)
58.65 Def + 260 HP for Fearow (Drill Run) vs Fearow (1v1, 2v2)
61.53 Def + 267 HP for Fearow (Peck) vs Fearow (2v2)
66.47 Def for Fearow (Steel Wing) vs Fearow (2v2)
58.44 Def for Mantine (Ice Beam) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.45 Def for Mantine (Bubble Beam) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.63 Def for Mantine (Twister) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.78 Def for Mantine (Water Pulse) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.78 Def for Mantine (Bubble) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.78 Def for Mantine (Wing Attack) vs Mantine (2v2)
58.78 Def for Mantine (Aerial Ace) vs Mantine (2v2)
59.26 Def + 252 HP for Umbreon (Psychic) vs Umbreon (1v2)
59.31 Def + 252 HP for Umbreon (Last Resort) vs Umbreon (1v2)
59.57 Def + 257 HP for Umbreon (Foul Play) vs Umbreon (1v2)
59.65 Def + 253 HP for Umbreon (Dark Pulse) vs Umbreon (1v2)
59.22 Def + 254 HP for Shadow Araquanid (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Araquanid (1v0, 2v1)
59.32 Def + 253 HP for Shadow Araquanid (Bug Buzz) vs Shadow Araquanid (1v0, 2v1)
59.38 Def + 254 HP for Shadow Araquanid (Bubble Beam) vs Shadow Araquanid (1v0, 2v1)
60.18 Def + 268 HP for Shadow Araquanid (Mirror Coat) vs Shadow Araquanid (1v0, 2v1)
60.80 Def + 257 HP for Shadow Araquanid (Infestation) vs Shadow Araquanid (1v0, 2v1)
58.27 Def + 253 HP for Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
58.59 Def + 253 HP for Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
58.71 Def + 258 HP for Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
58.92 Def + 256 HP for Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
60.39 Def + 278 HP for Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
60.39 Def + 278 HP for Feraligatr (Water Gun) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
60.39 Def + 260 HP for Feraligatr (Waterfall) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
60.63 Def + 256 HP for Feraligatr (Ice Fang) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
60.38 Def + 253 HP for Annihilape (Close Combat) vs Annihilape (0v0)
60.38 Def + 257 HP for Annihilape (Low Sweep) vs Annihilape (0v0)
60.62 Def + 254 HP for Annihilape (Ice Punch) vs Annihilape (0v0)
60.82 Def for Annihilape (Shadow Ball) vs Annihilape (0v0)
61.12 Def for Annihilape (Night Slash) vs Annihilape (0v0)
61.26 Def + 253 HP for Annihilape (Rage Fist) vs Annihilape (0v0)
61.59 Def for Annihilape (Low Kick) vs Annihilape (0v0)
61.59 Def for Annihilape (Counter) vs Annihilape (0v0)
58.35 Def for Hisuian Electrode (Wild Charge) vs Hisuian Electrode (1v2)
58.64 Def for Hisuian Electrode (Energy Ball) vs Hisuian Electrode (1v2)
58.77 Def for Hisuian Electrode (Swift) vs Hisuian Electrode (1v2)
60.10 Def for Hisuian Electrode (Tackle) vs Hisuian Electrode (1v2)
60.10 Def for Hisuian Electrode (Thunder Shock) vs Hisuian Electrode (1v2)
58.24 Def + 254 HP for Rillaboom (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
59.22 Def + 254 HP for Rillaboom (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
59.28 Def + 262 HP for Rillaboom (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
59.35 Def + 254 HP for Rillaboom (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
59.58 Def + 254 HP for Rillaboom (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
64.55 Def + 265 HP for Rillaboom (Scratch) vs Rillaboom (2v2 with bait)
64.55 Def + 265 HP for Rillaboom (Razor Leaf) vs Rillaboom (2v2 with bait)
58.45 Def + 259 HP for Shadow Vigoroth (Body Slam) vs Shadow Vigoroth (1v1 with bait)
58.50 Def + 259 HP for Shadow Vigoroth (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Vigoroth (1v1 with bait)
58.50 Def + 259 HP for Shadow Vigoroth (Brick Break) vs Shadow Vigoroth (1v1 with bait)
58.62 Def + 259 HP for Shadow Vigoroth (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Vigoroth (1v1 with bait)
61.08 Def + 265 HP for Shadow Vigoroth (Counter) vs Shadow Vigoroth (1v1 with bait)
65.28 Def for Shadow Vigoroth (Scratch) vs Shadow Vigoroth (1v1 with bait)
58.25 Def + 272 HP for Lapras (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.32 Def + 272 HP for Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.32 Def + 272 HP for Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.50 Def + 272 HP for Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.58 Def + 272 HP for Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.71 Def + 272 HP for Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.79 Def + 272 HP for Lapras (Ice Shard) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.88 Def + 272 HP for Lapras (Surf) vs Lapras (1v2)
60.97 Def + 276 HP for Lapras (Frost Breath) vs Lapras (1v2)
61.32 Def + 258 HP for Furret (Hyper Beam) vs Furret (1v2)
61.73 Def + 260 HP for Furret (Dig) vs Furret (1v2)
61.82 Def + 259 HP for Furret (Brick Break) vs Furret (1v2)
61.84 Def + 258 HP for Furret (Swift) vs Furret (1v2)
62.14 Def + 260 HP for Furret (Trailblaze) vs Furret (1v2)
62.46 Def + 265 HP for Furret (Sucker Punch) vs Furret (1v2)
64.25 Def + 261 HP for Furret (Quick Attack) vs Furret (1v2)
58.36 Def for Shadow Malamar (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
58.37 Def + 257 HP for Shadow Malamar (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
58.64 Def for Shadow Malamar (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 1v1, 1v2)
58.82 Def for Shadow Malamar (Psybeam) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
64.28 Def for Shadow Malamar (Psywave) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
58.46 Def + 260 HP for Shadow Charjabug (Crunch) vs Shadow Charjabug (1v1, 1v2)
58.50 Def + 258 HP for Shadow Charjabug (X-Scissor) vs Shadow Charjabug (1v1, 1v2)
58.62 Def + 261 HP for Shadow Charjabug (Discharge) vs Shadow Charjabug (1v1, 1v2)
58.75 Def + 267 HP for Shadow Charjabug (Volt Switch) vs Shadow Charjabug (1v1, 1v2)
62.50 Def + 268 HP for Shadow Charjabug (Bug Bite) vs Shadow Charjabug (1v1 no bait)
67.14 Def + 267 HP for Shadow Charjabug (Spark) vs Shadow Charjabug (1v1, 1v2)
58.37 Def for Shadow Forretress (Earthquake) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.47 Def for Shadow Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.86 Def for Shadow Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.95 Def for Shadow Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
59.18 Def for Shadow Forretress (Struggle Bug) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.24 Def + 253 HP for Forretress (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.57 Def + 255 HP for Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.71 Def + 258 HP for Forretress (Struggle Bug) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.76 Def + 253 HP for Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.76 Def + 254 HP for Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.80 Def + 253 HP for Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (0v1)
62.43 Def + 254 HP for Forretress (Volt Switch) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.30 Def for Medicham (Dynamic Punch) vs Medicham (1v1)
58.52 Def for Medicham (Ice Punch) vs Medicham (1v1)
59.30 Def for Medicham (Power-Up Punch) vs Medicham (1v1)
59.30 Def for Medicham (Counter) vs Medicham (1v1)
59.59 Def for Medicham (Psychic) vs Medicham (1v1)
58.38 Def + 260 HP for Shadow Hydreigon (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Hydreigon (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
58.38 Def for Shadow Hydreigon (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Hydreigon (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
58.41 Def + 260 HP for Shadow Hydreigon (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Hydreigon (0v0, 1v1)
58.42 Def + 260 HP for Shadow Hydreigon (Dark Pulse) vs Shadow Hydreigon (0v0, 1v1)
58.56 Def + 261 HP for Shadow Hydreigon (Fly) vs Shadow Hydreigon (0v0, 1v1)
61.14 Def for Shadow Hydreigon (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1)
63.57 Def + 256 HP for Kingdra (Blizzard) vs Kingdra (2v2)
63.59 Def + 257 HP for Kingdra (Outrage) vs Kingdra (2v2)
63.63 Def + 258 HP for Kingdra (Surf) vs Kingdra (2v2)
63.80 Def + 257 HP for Kingdra (Hydro Pump) vs Kingdra (2v2)
64.04 Def + 255 HP for Kingdra (Swift) vs Kingdra (2v2)
64.55 Def for Kingdra (Octazooka) vs Kingdra (2v2)
65.16 Def for Kingdra (Dragon Breath) vs Kingdra (2v2)
65.33 Def for Kingdra (Waterfall) vs Kingdra (2v2)
58.34 Def + 256 HP for Diggersby (Fire Punch) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.34 Def + 254 HP for Diggersby (Hyper Beam) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.57 Def + 252 HP for Diggersby (Earthquake) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.57 Def + 252 HP for Diggersby (Scorching Sands) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.73 Def + 254 HP for Diggersby (Dig) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
62.34 Def + 262 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
62.39 Def + 261 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
62.39 Def + 261 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
63.09 Def + 261 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
65.09 Def + 268 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Ice Fang) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
66.43 Def + 262 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Waterfall) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
65.32 Def + 267 HP for Oinkologne (Female) (Mud Slap) vs Oinkologne (Female) (1v1 with bait)
65.39 Def + 265 HP for Oinkologne (Female) (Body Slam) vs Oinkologne (Female) (1v1)
65.63 Def + 264 HP for Oinkologne (Female) (Dig) vs Oinkologne (Female) (1v1)
65.79 Def + 264 HP for Oinkologne (Female) (Trailblaze) vs Oinkologne (Female) (1v1 with bait)
66.50 Def + 265 HP for Oinkologne (Female) (Take Down) vs Oinkologne (Female) (1v1)
58.40 Def + 263 HP for Spidops (Lunge) vs Spidops (2v2)
58.46 Def + 263 HP for Spidops (X-Scissor) vs Spidops (2v2)
58.81 Def + 264 HP for Spidops (Grass Knot) vs Spidops (2v2)
58.81 Def + 263 HP for Spidops (Rock Tomb) vs Spidops (2v2)
61.56 Def + 265 HP for Spidops (Counter) vs Spidops (2v2)
61.56 Def + 273 HP for Spidops (Bug Bite) vs Spidops (2v2)
58.45 Def + 261 HP for Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.63 Def + 264 HP for Cradily (Acid) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.63 Def + 261 HP for Cradily (Stone Edge) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.63 Def + 261 HP for Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.63 Def + 261 HP for Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.84 Def + 261 HP for Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Cradily (2v2)
60.80 Def + 261 HP for Cradily (Infestation) vs Cradily (2v2)
64.13 Def + 263 HP for Cradily (Bullet Seed) vs Cradily (2v2)
58.29 Def + 260 HP for Wartortle (Aqua Jet) vs Wartortle (0v0, 1v2)
58.29 Def + 258 HP for Wartortle (Hydro Pump) vs Wartortle (0v0, 1v2)
58.56 Def + 257 HP for Wartortle (Ice Beam) vs Wartortle (0v0, 1v2)
60.58 Def for Bombirdier (Drill Run) vs Bombirdier (1v2 with bait)
60.66 Def for Bombirdier (Payback) vs Bombirdier (1v2 with bait)
60.89 Def + 251 HP for Bombirdier (Fly) vs Bombirdier (1v2 with bait)
61.04 Def for Bombirdier (Aerial Ace) vs Bombirdier (1v2 with bait)
61.09 Def for Bombirdier (Rock Tomb) vs Bombirdier (1v2 with bait)
62.31 Def for Bombirdier (Wing Attack) vs Bombirdier (1v2 with bait)
62.31 Def for Bombirdier (Sucker Punch) vs Bombirdier (1v2 with bait)
60.06 Def + 257 HP for Shadow Cradily (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1, 2v2)
60.06 Def + 256 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1, 2v2)
60.06 Def + 256 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1, 2v2)
60.22 Def + 257 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1, 2v2)
60.24 Def + 257 HP for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1, 2v2)
61.56 Def + 260 HP for Shadow Cradily (Acid) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1, 2v2)
61.56 Def + 260 HP for Shadow Cradily (Bullet Seed) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1, 2v2)
62.54 Def + 258 HP for Shadow Cradily (Infestation) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1, 2v2)
58.92 Def for Shadow Sableye (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1 no bait)
58.99 Def for Shadow Sableye (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1 no bait)
59.10 Def for Shadow Sableye (Foul Play) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1 no bait)
59.15 Def for Shadow Sableye (Drain Punch) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1 no bait)
59.21 Def for Shadow Sableye (Power Gem) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1 no bait)
60.01 Def for Shadow Sableye (Feint Attack) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1 no bait)
60.01 Def for Shadow Sableye (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1 no bait)
58.34 Def + 272 HP for Sableye (Shadow Sneak) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 272 HP for Sableye (Foul Play) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye (Feint Attack) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye (Shadow Claw) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.38 Def + 272 HP for Sableye (Dazzling Gleam) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.51 Def + 272 HP for Sableye (Power Gem) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.57 Def + 272 HP for Sableye (Drain Punch) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
63.01 Def + 258 HP for Shadow Annihilape (Rage Fist) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
63.06 Def + 258 HP for Shadow Annihilape (Close Combat) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
63.07 Def + 258 HP for Shadow Annihilape (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
63.17 Def + 260 HP for Shadow Annihilape (Low Sweep) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
63.28 Def + 260 HP for Shadow Annihilape (Ice Punch) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
65.21 Def + 264 HP for Shadow Annihilape (Low Kick) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1 no bait)
65.38 Def + 263 HP for Shadow Annihilape (Night Slash) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1 no bait)
67.19 Def for Shadow Annihilape (Counter) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1 no bait)
59.16 Def + 255 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2 no bait)
59.19 Def + 256 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2 no bait)
59.23 Def + 254 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2 no bait)
59.28 Def + 255 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Superpower) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2 no bait)
59.29 Def + 254 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Outrage) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2 no bait)
59.34 Def + 255 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2 no bait)
59.42 Def + 255 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2 no bait)
63.34 Def + 260 HP for Charjabug (X-Scissor) vs Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
63.66 Def + 263 HP for Charjabug (Bug Bite) vs Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
64.00 Def + 261 HP for Charjabug (Crunch) vs Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
64.11 Def + 260 HP for Charjabug (Discharge) vs Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
65.28 Def for Charjabug (Volt Switch) vs Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
58.26 Def + 254 HP for Hippowdon (Earth Power) vs Hippowdon (0v0, 2v2)
58.44 Def + 254 HP for Hippowdon (Body Slam) vs Hippowdon (0v0, 2v2)
58.47 Def + 254 HP for Hippowdon (Earthquake) vs Hippowdon (0v0, 2v2)
58.47 Def + 253 HP for Hippowdon (Scorching Sands) vs Hippowdon (0v0, 2v2)
58.54 Def + 253 HP for Hippowdon (Stone Edge) vs Hippowdon (0v0, 2v2)
58.85 Def + 254 HP for Hippowdon (Weather Ball (Rock)) vs Hippowdon (0v0, 2v2)
60.42 Def + 263 HP for Hippowdon (Ice Fang) vs Hippowdon (0v0, 2v2)
60.42 Def for Hippowdon (Sand Attack) vs Hippowdon (2v2 no bait)
62.93 Def + 268 HP for Hippowdon (Fire Fang) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
62.93 Def + 268 HP for Hippowdon (Thunder Fang) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
58.24 Def for Blastoise (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.30 Def for Blastoise (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.30 Def for Blastoise (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
59.59 Def + 257 HP for Shadow Hippowdon (Earthquake) vs Shadow Hippowdon (1v1 no bait)
59.59 Def + 257 HP for Shadow Hippowdon (Scorching Sands) vs Shadow Hippowdon (1v1 no bait)
59.62 Def + 257 HP for Shadow Hippowdon (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Hippowdon (1v1 no bait)
59.68 Def + 257 HP for Shadow Hippowdon (Earth Power) vs Shadow Hippowdon (1v1 no bait)
59.75 Def + 258 HP for Shadow Hippowdon (Weather Ball (Rock)) vs Shadow Hippowdon (1v1 no bait)
60.11 Def + 257 HP for Shadow Hippowdon (Body Slam) vs Shadow Hippowdon (1v1 no bait)
61.05 Def + 258 HP for Shadow Hippowdon (Ice Fang) vs Shadow Hippowdon (1v1 no bait)
58.24 Def + 253 HP for Turtonator (Dragon Pulse) vs Turtonator (0v1, 1v1, 1v2)
58.27 Def + 257 HP for Turtonator (Incinerate) vs Turtonator (0v1, 1v1, 1v2)
58.41 Def + 253 HP for Turtonator (Flash Cannon) vs Turtonator (0v1, 1v1, 1v2)
58.44 Def + 254 HP for Turtonator (Dragon Claw) vs Turtonator (0v1, 1v1, 1v2)
58.51 Def + 253 HP for Turtonator (Overheat) vs Turtonator (0v1, 1v1, 1v2)
58.61 Def + 259 HP for Turtonator (Flamethrower) vs Turtonator (0v1, 1v1, 1v2)
59.00 Def + 257 HP for Turtonator (Brutal Swing) vs Turtonator (0v1, 1v1, 1v2)
60.89 Def + 276 HP for Turtonator (Fire Spin) vs Turtonator (1v1, 1v2 no bait)
64.07 Def + 258 HP for Melmetal (Flash Cannon) vs Melmetal (2v1)
64.10 Def + 258 HP for Melmetal (Hyper Beam) vs Melmetal (2v1)
64.10 Def + 258 HP for Melmetal (Rock Slide) vs Melmetal (2v1)
64.10 Def + 258 HP for Melmetal (Thunderbolt) vs Melmetal (2v1)
64.12 Def + 257 HP for Melmetal (Double Iron Bash) vs Melmetal (2v1)
64.33 Def for Melmetal (Dynamic Punch) vs Melmetal (2v1)
64.42 Def for Melmetal (Superpower) vs Melmetal (2v1)
65.52 Def for Melmetal (Thunder Shock) vs Melmetal (2v1)
58.24 Def for Shadow Quagsire (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.34 Def for Shadow Quagsire (Sludge Bomb) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.35 Def for Shadow Quagsire (Mud Bomb) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.39 Def for Shadow Quagsire (Earthquake) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.46 Def for Shadow Quagsire (Drain Punch) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0)
58.68 Def for Shadow Quagsire (Aqua Tail) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0)
65.20 Def + 265 HP for Snorlax (Superpower) vs Snorlax (0v1)
65.28 Def + 265 HP for Snorlax (Outrage) vs Snorlax (0v1)
65.38 Def + 265 HP for Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Snorlax (0v1)
65.44 Def + 265 HP for Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Snorlax (0v1)
65.44 Def + 265 HP for Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (0v1)
65.55 Def + 265 HP for Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Snorlax (0v1)
66.66 Def + 268 HP for Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Snorlax (0v1)
59.20 Def for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 1v1)
59.46 Def for Guzzlord (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 1v1)
59.49 Def for Guzzlord (Sludge Bomb) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 1v1)
59.54 Def for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 1v1)
64.66 Def + 264 HP for Dondozo (Outrage) vs Dondozo (0v0)
64.80 Def + 265 HP for Dondozo (Surf) vs Dondozo (0v0)
64.88 Def + 266 HP for Dondozo (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (0v0)
64.97 Def + 265 HP for Dondozo (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (0v0)
66.37 Def + 267 HP for Stunfisk (Discharge) vs Stunfisk (1v2 no bait)
66.83 Def + 266 HP for Stunfisk (Mud Bomb) vs Stunfisk (1v2 no bait)
67.46 Def for Vigoroth (Rock Slide) vs Vigoroth (2v2 no bait)

Anchors we get for free (27 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

111.28 Atk for Clodsire (Dragon Claw) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.63 Atk for Clodsire (Brutal Swing) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.35 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1, 2v2)
111.51 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1)
111.55 Atk for Vigoroth (Dragon Claw) vs Vigoroth (2v2 with bait)
111.71 Atk for Vigoroth (Brutal Swing) vs Vigoroth (2v2 with bait)
110.88 Atk for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (2v2 with bait)
111.17 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
111.76 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Tail) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
110.88 Atk for Sableye Mega (Dragon Claw) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0)
111.36 Atk for Sableye Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0)
111.14 Atk for Malamar Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
110.81 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Claw) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.20 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Tail) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.78 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Brutal Swing) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
110.70 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2 with bait)
110.88 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2 with bait)
111.13 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2 with bait)
110.78 Atk for Bombirdier (Dragon Claw) vs Bombirdier (0v0)
112.23 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
111.61 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
112.01 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
111.96 Atk for Quagsire (Dragon Claw) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.13 Atk for Mantine (Dragon Claw) vs Mantine (1v1 with bait)
110.79 Atk for Shadow Hydreigon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hydreigon (2v2)
110.79 Atk for Turtonator (Dragon Claw) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)
111.01 Atk for Turtonator (Brutal Swing) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)

Member IVs (1)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
0/14/2 👑	112.31	67.51	264	#61	-2	-1.0	-0.4	-8.1

Fearow Atk · atk≥119.22 (52 IV spreads) (−148 vs Annihilape (Shadow) Atk (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 80 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Aegislash (Shield), Annihilape, Shadow Annihilape, Shadow Araquanid, +32 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Fearow (2 scenario flips).

115.24 Atk for Melmetal (Brutal Swing) vs Melmetal (2v1)
115.13 Atk for Ninetales (Dragon Claw) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
115.85 Atk for Ninetales (Dragon Tail) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
116.91 Atk for Ninetales (Brutal Swing) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
111.28 Atk for Clodsire (Dragon Claw) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.63 Atk for Clodsire (Brutal Swing) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.35 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1, 2v2)
111.51 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1, 2v2)
111.55 Atk for Vigoroth (Dragon Claw) vs Vigoroth (1v2, 2v2 with bait)
111.71 Atk for Vigoroth (Brutal Swing) vs Vigoroth (1v2, 2v2 with bait)
113.78 Atk for Vigoroth (Dragon Tail) vs Vigoroth (2v2 with bait)
119.22 Atk for Fearow (Dragon Tail) vs Fearow (2v2)
118.33 Atk for Shadow Araquanid (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Araquanid (1v0)
118.54 Atk for Shadow Araquanid (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Araquanid (1v0)
115.26 Atk for Shadow Vigoroth (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Vigoroth (2v2)
115.81 Atk for Shadow Vigoroth (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Vigoroth (2v2)
114.72 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v2)
115.22 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v2)
114.50 Atk for Charjabug (Dragon Claw) vs Charjabug (1v2 with bait)
115.22 Atk for Charjabug (Dragon Tail) vs Charjabug (1v2 with bait)
116.26 Atk for Charjabug (Brutal Swing) vs Charjabug (1v2 with bait)
115.82 Atk for Malamar (Dragon Claw) vs Malamar (0v0, 1v2)
116.23 Atk for Malamar (Dragon Tail) vs Malamar (0v0)
116.84 Atk for Malamar (Brutal Swing) vs Malamar (0v0, 1v2)
110.88 Atk for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (2v2 with bait)
111.17 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
111.76 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Tail) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
116.00 Atk for Hippowdon (Dragon Claw) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
116.42 Atk for Hippowdon (Dragon Tail) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
117.02 Atk for Hippowdon (Brutal Swing) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
116.01 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1 with bait)
116.29 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1 with bait)
110.88 Atk for Sableye Mega (Dragon Claw) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0, 2v2)
111.36 Atk for Sableye Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0, 2v2)
117.34 Atk for Sableye Mega (Dragon Tail) vs Sableye (Mega) (2v2 with bait)
111.14 Atk for Malamar Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
112.49 Atk for Malamar Mega (Dragon Claw) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0, 1v2)
113.20 Atk for Malamar Mega (Dragon Tail) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
110.81 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Claw) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.20 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Tail) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.78 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Brutal Swing) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
112.79 Atk for Aegislash Shield (Brutal Swing) vs Aegislash (Shield) (0v0)
110.70 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2)
110.88 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2 with bait)
111.13 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2)
115.04 Atk for Toxapex (Brutal Swing) vs Toxapex (0v0)
115.04 Atk for Toxapex (Dragon Claw) vs Toxapex (0v0)
110.79 Atk for Turtonator (Dragon Claw) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)
111.01 Atk for Turtonator (Brutal Swing) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)
118.12 Atk for Wartortle (Dragon Claw) vs Wartortle (0v0)
118.86 Atk for Wartortle (Dragon Tail) vs Wartortle (0v0)
110.78 Atk for Bombirdier (Dragon Claw) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
116.83 Atk for Bombirdier (Dragon Tail) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
117.99 Atk for Bombirdier (Brutal Swing) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
117.20 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0)
118.05 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0)
112.23 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
112.64 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
113.22 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
115.18 Atk for Stunfisk (Brutal Swing) vs Stunfisk (1v2 no bait)
115.73 Atk for Stunfisk (Dragon Claw) vs Stunfisk (1v2 no bait)
117.05 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Tail) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
117.66 Atk for Feraligatr (Brutal Swing) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
118.52 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Claw) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
118.53 Atk for Shadow Annihilape (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1 no bait)
111.61 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
112.01 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
112.60 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
113.94 Atk for Corviknight (Dragon Claw) vs Corviknight (1v0)
111.96 Atk for Quagsire (Dragon Claw) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.36 Atk for Quagsire (Dragon Tail) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.94 Atk for Quagsire (Brutal Swing) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.13 Atk for Mantine (Dragon Claw) vs Mantine (1v1)
112.62 Atk for Mantine (Brutal Swing) vs Mantine (1v1)
114.72 Atk for Snorlax (Dragon Claw) vs Snorlax (0v0)
112.80 Atk for Annihilape (Brutal Swing) vs Annihilape (1v0)
112.96 Atk for Annihilape (Dragon Claw) vs Annihilape (1v0)
114.32 Atk for Dondozo (Dragon Claw) vs Dondozo (1v1 with bait)
115.11 Atk for Dondozo (Brutal Swing) vs Dondozo (1v1)
110.79 Atk for Shadow Hydreigon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hydreigon (2v2)

Anchors we get for free (40 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

58.29 Def + 256 HP for Clodsire bulk (Stone Edge) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.29 Def + 256 HP for Clodsire bulk (Water Pulse) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.27 Def for Feraligatr bulk (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1)
58.35 Def for Hisuian Electrode bulk (Wild Charge) vs Hisuian Electrode (1v2)
58.25 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.32 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.32 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.36 Def for Shadow Malamar bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Malamar bulk (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Forretress bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Forretress bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.24 Def for Forretress bulk (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.30 Def for Medicham bulk (Dynamic Punch) vs Medicham (1v1)
58.38 Def for Shadow Hydreigon bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1, 2v2)
58.38 Def for Shadow Hydreigon bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1, 2v2)
58.34 Def for Diggersby bulk (Fire Punch) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.34 Def for Diggersby bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.29 Def for Wartortle bulk (Aqua Jet) vs Wartortle (1v2)
58.29 Def for Wartortle bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Wartortle (1v2)
58.36 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Heat Wave) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.39 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Overheat) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.27 Def for Fearow bulk (Sky Attack) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.36 Def for Fearow bulk (Twister) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.36 Def for Fearow bulk (Drill Peck) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.24 Def for Rillaboom bulk (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (1v1 no bait)
58.24 Def for Blastoise bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.30 Def for Blastoise bulk (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.30 Def for Blastoise bulk (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.24 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.34 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Sludge Bomb) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.35 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Mud Bomb) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.39 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.24 Def for Turtonator bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.27 Def for Turtonator bulk (Incinerate) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Feint Attack) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Shadow Claw) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Foul Play) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.38 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.26 Def + 256 HP for Hippowdon bulk (Earth Power) vs Hippowdon (2v2 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

119.16 Atk flips Spidops (1v1 with bait) [107 IVs]
114.31 Atk flips Mandibuzz (0v1) [2812 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Spidops (1v1)

Member IVs (52)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/0/2 👑	120.08	59.14	264	#1799	+0	+0.5	-36.2	+1.0
13/0/1	120.08	59.14	263	#2083	+0	-0.8	-37.0	-1.9
15/1/11 👑	119.75	58.99	266	#2250	+0	+0.9	-40.2	-2.2
15/0/15 👑	119.75	58.40	268	#2421	+0	+0.4	-41.1	-4.4
13/0/0	120.08	59.14	262	#2424	+0	-2.4	-38.2	-2.9
12/0/6 👑	119.48	59.14	266	#2456	+0	-1.5	-39.8	-3.8
12/1/2 👑	119.48	59.74	264	#2552	+0	-1.9	-38.8	-4.9
15/1/10	119.75	58.99	265	#2567	+0	-1.8	-41.1	-3.0
15/2/6 👑	119.75	59.58	263	#2627	+0	-2.1	-40.2	-4.1
15/2/7 👑	119.75	59.58	263	#2628	+0	-2.1	-40.2	-4.1
15/3/1 👑	119.75	60.17	260	#2717	+0	-3.3	-41.6	-4.8
15/3/2 👑	119.75	60.17	260	#2718	+0	-3.3	-41.6	-4.8
12/0/4	119.48	59.14	265	#2776	+0	-4.2	-40.6	-4.6
12/0/5	119.48	59.14	265	#2777	+0	-4.2	-40.6	-4.6
15/1/8	119.75	58.99	264	#2796	+0	-3.6	-42.2	-4.6
15/1/9	119.75	58.99	264	#2797	+0	-3.6	-42.2	-4.6
15/0/13	119.75	58.40	267	#2803	+0	-2.3	-41.9	-5.3
15/0/14	119.75	58.40	267	#2804	+0	-2.3	-41.9	-5.3
12/1/1	119.48	59.74	263	#2827	+0	-4.5	-39.2	-5.8
15/2/5	119.75	59.58	262	#2863	+0	-4.5	-41.4	-5.1
12/0/2	119.48	59.14	264	#2950	+0	-6.0	-41.2	-6.1
12/0/3	119.48	59.14	264	#2951	+0	-6.0	-41.2	-6.1
15/0/11	119.75	58.40	266	#2977	+0	-4.2	-42.8	-6.0
15/0/12	119.75	58.40	266	#2978	+0	-4.2	-42.8	-6.0
12/1/0	119.48	59.74	262	#3012	+0	-6.0	-40.2	-6.7
15/3/0	119.75	60.17	259	#3097	+0	-4.9	-44.2	-10.1
15/1/6	119.75	58.99	263	#3113	+0	-5.5	-43.3	-7.5
15/1/7	119.75	58.99	263	#3114	+0	-5.5	-43.3	-7.5
15/2/3	119.75	59.58	261	#3191	+0	-6.0	-42.5	-8.1
15/2/4	119.75	59.58	261	#3192	+0	-6.0	-42.5	-8.1
12/0/1	119.48	59.14	263	#3221	+0	-8.5	-42.0	-9.1
15/0/10	119.75	58.40	265	#3236	+0	-5.4	-43.9	-9.0
15/1/5	119.75	58.99	262	#3345	+0	-6.5	-45.8	-9.7
15/2/1	119.75	59.58	260	#3413	+0	-6.7	-45.2	-11.2
15/2/2	119.75	59.58	260	#3414	+0	-6.7	-45.2	-11.2
15/0/8	119.75	58.40	264	#3466	+0	-6.8	-45.1	-11.8
15/0/9	119.75	58.40	264	#3467	+0	-6.8	-45.1	-11.8
12/0/0	119.48	59.14	262	#3470	+0	-10.3	-43.2	-10.1
15/1/3	119.75	58.99	261	#3539	+0	-7.2	-47.0	-11.5
15/1/4	119.75	58.99	261	#3540	+0	-7.2	-47.0	-11.5
15/1/1	119.75	58.99	260	#3624	+0	-8.5	-48.6	-13.1
15/1/2	119.75	58.99	260	#3625	+0	-8.5	-48.6	-13.1
15/2/0	119.75	59.58	259	#3633	+0	-7.4	-45.9	-11.9
15/0/6	119.75	58.40	263	#3696	+0	-7.5	-47.9	-12.5
15/0/7	119.75	58.40	263	#3697	+0	-7.5	-47.9	-12.5
15/1/0	119.75	58.99	259	#3810	+0	-9.6	-49.6	-14.7
15/0/5	119.75	58.40	262	#3852	+0	-8.8	-51.5	-15.3
15/0/3	119.75	58.40	261	#3946	+0	-9.6	-53.0	-16.6
15/0/4	119.75	58.40	261	#3947	+0	-9.6	-53.0	-16.6
15/0/1	119.75	58.40	260	#4038	+0	-11.8	-52.6	-16.8
… 2 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Annihilape (Shadow) Atk · atk≥118.53 (200 IV spreads) (−2382 vs Guzzlord Mirror Atk (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 77 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Aegislash (Shield), Annihilape, Shadow Annihilape, Shadow Araquanid, +31 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Annihilape (Shadow) (2 scenario flips).

115.24 Atk for Melmetal (Brutal Swing) vs Melmetal (2v1)
115.13 Atk for Ninetales (Dragon Claw) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
115.85 Atk for Ninetales (Dragon Tail) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
116.91 Atk for Ninetales (Brutal Swing) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
111.28 Atk for Clodsire (Dragon Claw) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.63 Atk for Clodsire (Brutal Swing) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.35 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1, 2v2)
111.51 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1, 2v2)
111.55 Atk for Vigoroth (Dragon Claw) vs Vigoroth (1v2, 2v2 with bait)
111.71 Atk for Vigoroth (Brutal Swing) vs Vigoroth (1v2, 2v2 with bait)
113.78 Atk for Vigoroth (Dragon Tail) vs Vigoroth (2v2 with bait)
118.33 Atk for Shadow Araquanid (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Araquanid (1v0)
115.26 Atk for Shadow Vigoroth (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Vigoroth (2v2)
115.81 Atk for Shadow Vigoroth (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Vigoroth (2v2)
114.72 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v2)
115.22 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v2)
114.50 Atk for Charjabug (Dragon Claw) vs Charjabug (1v2 with bait)
115.22 Atk for Charjabug (Dragon Tail) vs Charjabug (1v2 with bait)
116.26 Atk for Charjabug (Brutal Swing) vs Charjabug (1v2 with bait)
115.82 Atk for Malamar (Dragon Claw) vs Malamar (0v0, 1v2)
116.23 Atk for Malamar (Dragon Tail) vs Malamar (0v0)
116.84 Atk for Malamar (Brutal Swing) vs Malamar (0v0, 1v2)
110.88 Atk for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (2v2 with bait)
111.17 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
111.76 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Tail) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
116.00 Atk for Hippowdon (Dragon Claw) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
116.42 Atk for Hippowdon (Dragon Tail) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
117.02 Atk for Hippowdon (Brutal Swing) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
116.01 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1 with bait)
116.29 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1 with bait)
110.88 Atk for Sableye Mega (Dragon Claw) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0)
111.36 Atk for Sableye Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0)
117.34 Atk for Sableye Mega (Dragon Tail) vs Sableye (Mega) (2v2 with bait)
111.14 Atk for Malamar Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
112.49 Atk for Malamar Mega (Dragon Claw) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
113.20 Atk for Malamar Mega (Dragon Tail) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
110.81 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Claw) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.20 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Tail) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.78 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Brutal Swing) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
112.79 Atk for Aegislash Shield (Brutal Swing) vs Aegislash (Shield) (0v0)
110.70 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2)
110.88 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2 with bait)
111.13 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2)
115.04 Atk for Toxapex (Brutal Swing) vs Toxapex (0v0)
115.04 Atk for Toxapex (Dragon Claw) vs Toxapex (0v0)
110.79 Atk for Turtonator (Dragon Claw) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)
111.01 Atk for Turtonator (Brutal Swing) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)
118.12 Atk for Wartortle (Dragon Claw) vs Wartortle (0v0)
110.78 Atk for Bombirdier (Dragon Claw) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
116.83 Atk for Bombirdier (Dragon Tail) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
117.99 Atk for Bombirdier (Brutal Swing) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
117.20 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0)
118.05 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0)
112.23 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
112.64 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
113.22 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
115.18 Atk for Stunfisk (Brutal Swing) vs Stunfisk (1v2 no bait)
115.73 Atk for Stunfisk (Dragon Claw) vs Stunfisk (1v2 no bait)
117.05 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Tail) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
117.66 Atk for Feraligatr (Brutal Swing) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
118.52 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Claw) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
118.53 Atk for Shadow Annihilape (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1 no bait)
111.61 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
112.01 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
112.60 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
113.94 Atk for Corviknight (Dragon Claw) vs Corviknight (1v0)
111.96 Atk for Quagsire (Dragon Claw) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.36 Atk for Quagsire (Dragon Tail) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.94 Atk for Quagsire (Brutal Swing) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.13 Atk for Mantine (Dragon Claw) vs Mantine (1v1)
112.62 Atk for Mantine (Brutal Swing) vs Mantine (1v1)
114.72 Atk for Snorlax (Dragon Claw) vs Snorlax (0v0)
112.80 Atk for Annihilape (Brutal Swing) vs Annihilape (1v0)
112.96 Atk for Annihilape (Dragon Claw) vs Annihilape (1v0)
114.32 Atk for Dondozo (Dragon Claw) vs Dondozo (1v1 with bait)
115.11 Atk for Dondozo (Brutal Swing) vs Dondozo (1v1)
110.79 Atk for Shadow Hydreigon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hydreigon (2v2)

Anchors we get for free (40 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

58.29 Def + 256 HP for Clodsire bulk (Stone Edge) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.29 Def + 256 HP for Clodsire bulk (Water Pulse) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.27 Def for Feraligatr bulk (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1)
58.35 Def for Hisuian Electrode bulk (Wild Charge) vs Hisuian Electrode (1v2)
58.25 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.32 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.32 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.36 Def for Shadow Malamar bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Malamar bulk (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Forretress bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Forretress bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.24 Def for Forretress bulk (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.30 Def for Medicham bulk (Dynamic Punch) vs Medicham (1v1)
58.38 Def for Shadow Hydreigon bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1, 2v2)
58.38 Def for Shadow Hydreigon bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1, 2v2)
58.34 Def for Diggersby bulk (Fire Punch) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.34 Def for Diggersby bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.29 Def for Wartortle bulk (Aqua Jet) vs Wartortle (1v2)
58.29 Def for Wartortle bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Wartortle (1v2)
58.36 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Heat Wave) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.39 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Overheat) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.27 Def for Fearow bulk (Sky Attack) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.36 Def for Fearow bulk (Twister) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.36 Def for Fearow bulk (Drill Peck) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.24 Def for Rillaboom bulk (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (1v1 no bait)
58.24 Def for Blastoise bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.30 Def for Blastoise bulk (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.30 Def for Blastoise bulk (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.24 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.34 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Sludge Bomb) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.35 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Mud Bomb) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.39 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.24 Def for Turtonator bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.27 Def for Turtonator bulk (Incinerate) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Feint Attack) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Shadow Claw) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Foul Play) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.38 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.26 Def + 256 HP for Hippowdon bulk (Earth Power) vs Hippowdon (2v2 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

114.31 Atk flips Mandibuzz (0v1) [2812 IVs]

Member IVs (200)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/0/2 👑	120.08	59.14	264	#1799	+0	+0.5	-36.2	+1.0
13/0/1	120.08	59.14	263	#2083	+0	-0.8	-37.0	-1.9
11/0/11 👑	118.88	59.14	269	#2226	+0	-4.0	-35.7	-3.0
15/1/11 👑	119.75	58.99	266	#2250	+0	+0.9	-40.2	-2.2
11/2/2 👑	118.88	60.34	264	#2368	+0	-2.8	-37.9	-4.6
13/3/11 👑	118.57	60.17	266	#2375	+0	-2.0	-35.2	-2.7
15/0/15 👑	119.75	58.40	268	#2421	+0	+0.4	-41.1	-4.4
13/0/0	120.08	59.14	262	#2424	+0	-2.4	-38.2	-2.9
13/4/6 👑	118.57	60.76	263	#2445	+0	-2.0	-37.4	-4.3
13/4/7 👑	118.57	60.76	263	#2446	+0	-2.0	-37.4	-4.3
12/0/6 👑	119.48	59.14	266	#2456	+0	-1.5	-39.8	-3.8
8/0/2 👑	118.55	59.88	267	#2468	+0	-4.4	-36.6	-2.3
14/2/11 👑	119.16	59.58	266	#2486	+0	-3.2	-37.9	-5.1
13/5/1 👑	118.57	61.35	260	#2496	+0	-0.7	-36.2	-7.6
13/5/2 👑	118.57	61.35	260	#2497	+0	-0.7	-36.2	-7.6
12/1/2 👑	119.48	59.74	264	#2552	+0	-1.9	-38.8	-4.9
14/1/15 👑	119.16	58.99	268	#2566	+0	-2.9	-37.7	-6.6
15/1/10	119.75	58.99	265	#2567	+0	-1.8	-41.1	-3.0
15/2/6 👑	119.75	59.58	263	#2627	+0	-2.1	-40.2	-4.1
15/2/7 👑	119.75	59.58	263	#2628	+0	-2.1	-40.2	-4.1
11/0/9	118.88	59.14	268	#2666	+0	-3.0	-38.2	-5.1
11/0/10	118.88	59.14	268	#2667	+0	-3.0	-38.2	-5.1
11/1/6 👑	118.88	59.74	266	#2675	+0	-3.3	-38.2	-5.8
15/3/1 👑	119.75	60.17	260	#2717	+0	-3.3	-41.6	-4.8
15/3/2 👑	119.75	60.17	260	#2718	+0	-3.3	-41.6	-4.8
11/0/7	118.88	59.14	267	#2727	+0	-4.1	-39.0	-6.0
11/0/8	118.88	59.14	267	#2728	+0	-4.1	-39.0	-6.0
13/2/15 👑	118.57	59.58	268	#2737	+0	-2.7	-35.6	-4.6
14/1/13	119.16	58.99	267	#2752	+0	-4.0	-38.6	-8.5
14/1/14	119.16	58.99	267	#2753	+0	-4.0	-38.6	-8.5
14/3/6 👑	119.16	60.17	263	#2758	+0	-3.5	-38.6	-9.3
14/3/7 👑	119.16	60.17	263	#2759	+0	-3.5	-38.6	-9.3
11/2/1	118.88	60.34	263	#2769	+0	-3.8	-38.7	-7.8
14/4/1 👑	119.16	60.76	260	#2773	+0	-3.6	-38.8	-8.9
14/4/2 👑	119.16	60.76	260	#2774	+0	-3.6	-38.8	-8.9
12/0/4	119.48	59.14	265	#2776	+0	-4.2	-40.6	-4.6
12/0/5	119.48	59.14	265	#2777	+0	-4.2	-40.6	-4.6
13/3/10	118.57	60.17	265	#2782	+0	-2.7	-38.5	-6.4
15/1/8	119.75	58.99	264	#2796	+0	-3.6	-42.2	-4.6
15/1/9	119.75	58.99	264	#2797	+0	-3.6	-42.2	-4.6
15/0/13	119.75	58.40	267	#2803	+0	-2.3	-41.9	-5.3
15/0/14	119.75	58.40	267	#2804	+0	-2.3	-41.9	-5.3
12/1/1	119.48	59.74	263	#2827	+0	-4.5	-39.2	-5.8
13/4/5	118.57	60.76	262	#2841	+0	-3.1	-38.3	-7.7
13/5/0	118.57	61.35	259	#2845	+0	-2.5	-37.4	-10.5
14/2/10	119.16	59.58	265	#2848	+0	-4.2	-38.7	-8.9
15/2/5	119.75	59.58	262	#2863	+0	-4.5	-41.4	-5.1
14/3/5	119.16	60.17	262	#2890	+0	-4.3	-39.7	-10.2
13/2/13	118.57	59.58	267	#2892	+0	-3.4	-38.3	-6.8
13/2/14	118.57	59.58	267	#2893	+0	-3.4	-38.3	-6.8
… 150 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Araquanid (Shadow) Atk · atk≥118.33 (200 IV spreads) (−2382 vs Guzzlord Mirror Atk (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 75 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Aegislash (Shield), Annihilape, Shadow Araquanid, Bombirdier, +30 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Araquanid (Shadow) (2 scenario flips).

115.24 Atk for Melmetal (Brutal Swing) vs Melmetal (2v1)
115.13 Atk for Ninetales (Dragon Claw) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
115.85 Atk for Ninetales (Dragon Tail) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
116.91 Atk for Ninetales (Brutal Swing) vs Ninetales (0v2 with bait)
111.28 Atk for Clodsire (Dragon Claw) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.63 Atk for Clodsire (Brutal Swing) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.35 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1, 2v2)
111.51 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1, 2v2)
111.55 Atk for Vigoroth (Dragon Claw) vs Vigoroth (1v2, 2v2 with bait)
111.71 Atk for Vigoroth (Brutal Swing) vs Vigoroth (1v2, 2v2 with bait)
113.78 Atk for Vigoroth (Dragon Tail) vs Vigoroth (2v2 with bait)
118.33 Atk for Shadow Araquanid (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Araquanid (1v0)
115.26 Atk for Shadow Vigoroth (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Vigoroth (2v2)
115.81 Atk for Shadow Vigoroth (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Vigoroth (2v2)
114.72 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v2)
115.22 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v2)
114.50 Atk for Charjabug (Dragon Claw) vs Charjabug (1v2 with bait)
115.22 Atk for Charjabug (Dragon Tail) vs Charjabug (1v2 with bait)
116.26 Atk for Charjabug (Brutal Swing) vs Charjabug (1v2 with bait)
115.82 Atk for Malamar (Dragon Claw) vs Malamar (0v0, 1v2)
116.23 Atk for Malamar (Dragon Tail) vs Malamar (0v0)
116.84 Atk for Malamar (Brutal Swing) vs Malamar (0v0, 1v2)
110.88 Atk for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (2v2 with bait)
111.17 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
111.76 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Tail) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
116.00 Atk for Hippowdon (Dragon Claw) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
116.42 Atk for Hippowdon (Dragon Tail) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
117.02 Atk for Hippowdon (Brutal Swing) vs Hippowdon (0v0)
116.01 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1 with bait)
116.29 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1 with bait)
110.88 Atk for Sableye Mega (Dragon Claw) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0)
111.36 Atk for Sableye Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0)
117.34 Atk for Sableye Mega (Dragon Tail) vs Sableye (Mega) (2v2 with bait)
111.14 Atk for Malamar Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
112.49 Atk for Malamar Mega (Dragon Claw) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
113.20 Atk for Malamar Mega (Dragon Tail) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
110.81 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Claw) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.20 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Tail) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.78 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Brutal Swing) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
112.79 Atk for Aegislash Shield (Brutal Swing) vs Aegislash (Shield) (0v0)
110.70 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2)
110.88 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2 with bait)
111.13 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2)
115.04 Atk for Toxapex (Brutal Swing) vs Toxapex (0v0)
115.04 Atk for Toxapex (Dragon Claw) vs Toxapex (0v0)
110.79 Atk for Turtonator (Dragon Claw) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)
111.01 Atk for Turtonator (Brutal Swing) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)
118.12 Atk for Wartortle (Dragon Claw) vs Wartortle (0v0)
110.78 Atk for Bombirdier (Dragon Claw) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
116.83 Atk for Bombirdier (Dragon Tail) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
117.99 Atk for Bombirdier (Brutal Swing) vs Bombirdier (0v0, 2v2)
117.20 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0)
118.05 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0)
112.23 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
112.64 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
113.22 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
115.18 Atk for Stunfisk (Brutal Swing) vs Stunfisk (1v2 no bait)
115.73 Atk for Stunfisk (Dragon Claw) vs Stunfisk (1v2 no bait)
117.05 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Tail) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
117.66 Atk for Feraligatr (Brutal Swing) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
111.61 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
112.01 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
112.60 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
113.94 Atk for Corviknight (Dragon Claw) vs Corviknight (1v0)
111.96 Atk for Quagsire (Dragon Claw) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.36 Atk for Quagsire (Dragon Tail) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.94 Atk for Quagsire (Brutal Swing) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.13 Atk for Mantine (Dragon Claw) vs Mantine (1v1)
112.62 Atk for Mantine (Brutal Swing) vs Mantine (1v1)
114.72 Atk for Snorlax (Dragon Claw) vs Snorlax (0v0)
112.80 Atk for Annihilape (Brutal Swing) vs Annihilape (1v0)
112.96 Atk for Annihilape (Dragon Claw) vs Annihilape (1v0)
114.32 Atk for Dondozo (Dragon Claw) vs Dondozo (1v1 with bait)
115.11 Atk for Dondozo (Brutal Swing) vs Dondozo (1v1)
110.79 Atk for Shadow Hydreigon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hydreigon (2v2)

Anchors we get for free (40 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

58.29 Def + 256 HP for Clodsire bulk (Stone Edge) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.29 Def + 256 HP for Clodsire bulk (Water Pulse) vs Clodsire (2v2)
58.27 Def for Feraligatr bulk (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1)
58.35 Def for Hisuian Electrode bulk (Wild Charge) vs Hisuian Electrode (1v2)
58.25 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.32 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.32 Def + 272 HP for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v2)
58.36 Def for Shadow Malamar bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Malamar bulk (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Forretress bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.37 Def for Shadow Forretress bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
58.24 Def for Forretress bulk (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v1)
58.30 Def for Medicham bulk (Dynamic Punch) vs Medicham (1v1)
58.38 Def for Shadow Hydreigon bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1, 2v2)
58.38 Def for Shadow Hydreigon bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Hydreigon (1v1, 2v2)
58.34 Def for Diggersby bulk (Fire Punch) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.34 Def for Diggersby bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Diggersby (0v0, 1v1)
58.29 Def for Wartortle bulk (Aqua Jet) vs Wartortle (1v2)
58.29 Def for Wartortle bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Wartortle (1v2)
58.36 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Heat Wave) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.39 Def for Shadow Ninetales bulk (Overheat) vs Shadow Ninetales (0v1 no bait)
58.27 Def for Fearow bulk (Sky Attack) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.36 Def for Fearow bulk (Twister) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.36 Def for Fearow bulk (Drill Peck) vs Fearow (1v1 no bait)
58.24 Def for Rillaboom bulk (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (1v1 no bait)
58.24 Def for Blastoise bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.30 Def for Blastoise bulk (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.30 Def for Blastoise bulk (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (1v2 no bait)
58.24 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.34 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Sludge Bomb) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.35 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Mud Bomb) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.39 Def for Shadow Quagsire bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Quagsire (0v0, 2v2)
58.24 Def for Turtonator bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.27 Def for Turtonator bulk (Incinerate) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Feint Attack) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Shadow Claw) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.34 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Foul Play) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.38 Def + 277 HP for Sableye bulk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Sableye (1v2 no bait)
58.26 Def + 256 HP for Hippowdon bulk (Earth Power) vs Hippowdon (2v2 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

118.29 Atk flips Shadow Annihilape (2v1 no bait) [238 IVs]
114.31 Atk flips Mandibuzz (0v1) [2812 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Shadow Annihilape (2v1)

Member IVs (200)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/0/2 👑	120.08	59.14	264	#1799	+0	+0.5	-36.2	+1.0
13/0/1	120.08	59.14	263	#2083	+0	-0.8	-37.0	-1.9
11/0/11 👑	118.88	59.14	269	#2226	+0	-4.0	-35.7	-3.0
15/1/11 👑	119.75	58.99	266	#2250	+0	+0.9	-40.2	-2.2
11/2/2 👑	118.88	60.34	264	#2368	+0	-2.8	-37.9	-4.6
13/3/11 👑	118.57	60.17	266	#2375	+0	-2.0	-35.2	-2.7
15/0/15 👑	119.75	58.40	268	#2421	+0	+0.4	-41.1	-4.4
13/0/0	120.08	59.14	262	#2424	+0	-2.4	-38.2	-2.9
13/4/6 👑	118.57	60.76	263	#2445	+0	-2.0	-37.4	-4.3
13/4/7 👑	118.57	60.76	263	#2446	+0	-2.0	-37.4	-4.3
12/0/6 👑	119.48	59.14	266	#2456	+0	-1.5	-39.8	-3.8
8/0/2 👑	118.55	59.88	267	#2468	+0	-4.4	-36.6	-2.3
14/2/11 👑	119.16	59.58	266	#2486	+0	-3.2	-37.9	-5.1
13/5/1 👑	118.57	61.35	260	#2496	+0	-0.7	-36.2	-7.6
13/5/2 👑	118.57	61.35	260	#2497	+0	-0.7	-36.2	-7.6
12/1/2 👑	119.48	59.74	264	#2552	+0	-1.9	-38.8	-4.9
14/1/15 👑	119.16	58.99	268	#2566	+0	-2.9	-37.7	-6.6
15/1/10	119.75	58.99	265	#2567	+0	-1.8	-41.1	-3.0
15/2/6 👑	119.75	59.58	263	#2627	+0	-2.1	-40.2	-4.1
15/2/7 👑	119.75	59.58	263	#2628	+0	-2.1	-40.2	-4.1
11/0/9	118.88	59.14	268	#2666	+0	-3.0	-38.2	-5.1
11/0/10	118.88	59.14	268	#2667	+0	-3.0	-38.2	-5.1
11/1/6 👑	118.88	59.74	266	#2675	+0	-3.3	-38.2	-5.8
15/3/1 👑	119.75	60.17	260	#2717	+0	-3.3	-41.6	-4.8
15/3/2 👑	119.75	60.17	260	#2718	+0	-3.3	-41.6	-4.8
11/0/7	118.88	59.14	267	#2727	+0	-4.1	-39.0	-6.0
11/0/8	118.88	59.14	267	#2728	+0	-4.1	-39.0	-6.0
13/2/15 👑	118.57	59.58	268	#2737	+0	-2.7	-35.6	-4.6
14/1/13	119.16	58.99	267	#2752	+0	-4.0	-38.6	-8.5
14/1/14	119.16	58.99	267	#2753	+0	-4.0	-38.6	-8.5
14/3/6 👑	119.16	60.17	263	#2758	+0	-3.5	-38.6	-9.3
14/3/7 👑	119.16	60.17	263	#2759	+0	-3.5	-38.6	-9.3
11/2/1	118.88	60.34	263	#2769	+0	-3.8	-38.7	-7.8
14/4/1 👑	119.16	60.76	260	#2773	+0	-3.6	-38.8	-8.9
14/4/2 👑	119.16	60.76	260	#2774	+0	-3.6	-38.8	-8.9
12/0/4	119.48	59.14	265	#2776	+0	-4.2	-40.6	-4.6
12/0/5	119.48	59.14	265	#2777	+0	-4.2	-40.6	-4.6
13/3/10	118.57	60.17	265	#2782	+0	-2.7	-38.5	-6.4
15/1/8	119.75	58.99	264	#2796	+0	-3.6	-42.2	-4.6
15/1/9	119.75	58.99	264	#2797	+0	-3.6	-42.2	-4.6
15/0/13	119.75	58.40	267	#2803	+0	-2.3	-41.9	-5.3
15/0/14	119.75	58.40	267	#2804	+0	-2.3	-41.9	-5.3
12/1/1	119.48	59.74	263	#2827	+0	-4.5	-39.2	-5.8
13/4/5	118.57	60.76	262	#2841	+0	-3.1	-38.3	-7.7
13/5/0	118.57	61.35	259	#2845	+0	-2.5	-37.4	-10.5
14/2/10	119.16	59.58	265	#2848	+0	-4.2	-38.7	-8.9
15/2/5	119.75	59.58	262	#2863	+0	-4.5	-41.4	-5.1
14/3/5	119.16	60.17	262	#2890	+0	-4.3	-39.7	-10.2
13/2/13	118.57	59.58	267	#2892	+0	-3.4	-38.3	-6.8
13/2/14	118.57	59.58	267	#2893	+0	-3.4	-38.3	-6.8
… 150 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

General · atk≥110.70, def≥58.24 (4089 IV spreads)

Clears 2 anchors across 2 shield scenarios, covering Shadow Hippowdon, Turtonator. Floor across 37 atk breakpoint opponents + 49 bulkpoint opponents. Clears the easiest anchor for every opponent.

110.70 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2 with bait)
58.24 Def for Turtonator bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Turtonator (0v1 with bait)

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Shadow Hydreigon (2v2)
vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)

Member IVs (4089)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
1/12/6 👑	112.91	66.31	266	#1	-3	+6.1	+2.3	-9.8
0/9/0 👑	113.71	65.32	266	#2	+4	+9.9	+3.4	-5.6
0/9/1 👑	113.71	65.32	266	#3	+4	+9.9	+3.4	-5.6
1/11/9 👑	112.91	65.71	268	#4	-2	+5.8	+1.9	-6.7
1/11/10 👑	112.91	65.71	268	#5	-2	+5.8	+1.9	-6.7
2/15/11 👑	112.08	67.25	266	#6	+2	+1.3	+2.1	+0.8
2/15/12 👑	112.08	67.25	266	#7	+2	+1.3	+2.1	+0.8
3/13/15 👑	112.67	66.07	268	#8	+1	+4.3	+1.5	-7.9
5/13/6 👑	113.85	66.07	263	#9	+0	+9.8	+2.6	-6.6
1/10/14 👑	112.91	65.12	271	#10	-4	+6.1	+2.4	-11.6
4/13/10 👑	113.26	66.07	265	#11	+0	+5.7	-1.9	-6.0
2/14/15 👑	112.08	66.66	268	#12	+0	+1.4	+1.8	-0.1
1/12/4	112.91	66.31	265	#13	-4	+5.5	+1.4	-10.7
1/12/5	112.91	66.31	265	#14	-4	+5.5	+1.4	-10.7
1/13/2 👑	112.91	66.91	264	#15	-3	+5.5	+1.6	-9.4
2/15/10	112.08	67.25	265	#16	+0	+0.6	+1.2	-0.6
3/14/11 👑	112.67	66.66	266	#17	+1	+4.2	+1.9	-6.4
5/12/10 👑	113.85	65.48	265	#18	-2	+10.0	+2.2	-6.8
3/13/13	112.67	66.07	267	#19	-1	+3.7	+0.6	-9.1
3/13/14	112.67	66.07	267	#20	-1	+3.7	+0.6	-9.1
1/11/7	112.91	65.71	267	#21	-5	+5.1	+1.0	-9.2
1/11/8	112.91	65.71	267	#22	-5	+5.1	+1.0	-9.2
0/11/14 👑	112.31	65.71	271	#23	-4	+0.1	+1.0	-5.6
7/15/12 👑	113.54	66.38	263	#24	+0	+6.5	+0.1	-9.4
1/15/15 👑	111.49	67.25	268	#25	-2	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
4/12/13 👑	113.26	65.48	267	#26	-3	+5.6	-2.1	-4.8
4/12/14 👑	113.26	65.48	267	#27	-3	+5.6	-2.1	-4.8
2/14/13	112.08	66.66	267	#28	-2	+0.7	+0.9	-0.9
2/14/14	112.08	66.66	267	#29	-2	+0.7	+0.9	-0.9
1/10/12	112.91	65.12	270	#30	+0	+5.4	+1.5	-12.5
1/10/13	112.91	65.12	270	#31	+0	+5.4	+1.5	-12.5
2/13/15	112.08	66.07	268	#32	-3	+0.2	-0.5	-3.4
0/8/5 👑	113.71	64.72	269	#33	+0	+8.1	+3.0	-9.3
4/13/8	113.26	66.07	264	#34	-2	+5.1	-2.8	-9.2
4/13/9	113.26	66.07	264	#35	-2	+5.1	-2.8	-9.2
0/12/9 👑	112.31	66.31	268	#36	-4	-0.6	+0.1	-8.2
0/12/10 👑	112.31	66.31	268	#37	-4	-0.6	+0.1	-8.2
1/13/1	112.91	66.91	263	#38	-6	+4.5	+0.6	-10.3
2/12/1	113.51	66.31	263	#39	+0	+6.3	-0.7	-10.2
3/15/6 👑	112.67	67.25	263	#40	-3	+3.5	+1.6	-10.2
3/15/7 👑	112.67	67.25	263	#41	-3	+3.5	+1.6	-10.2
0/13/6 👑	112.31	66.91	266	#42	-4	-1.2	+0.6	-5.8
0/11/12	112.31	65.71	270	#43	-5	-0.9	+0.1	-6.4
0/11/13	112.31	65.71	270	#44	-5	-0.9	+0.1	-6.4
3/14/10	112.67	66.66	265	#45	-3	+3.5	-0.1	-8.8
2/15/8	112.08	67.25	264	#46	-3	-0.0	+0.6	-3.2
2/15/9	112.08	67.25	264	#47	-3	-0.0	+0.6	-3.2
2/14/11	112.08	66.66	266	#48	-3	+0.0	-0.0	-2.0
2/14/12	112.08	66.66	266	#49	-3	+0.0	-0.0	-2.0
5/13/5	113.85	66.07	262	#50	-4	+7.5	+1.7	-11.1
… 4039 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Guzzlord Mirror Atk · atk≥114.48, hp≥249 (2582 IV spreads)

Clears 41 anchors across 6 shield scenarios, covering Aegislash (Shield), Annihilape, Bombirdier, Shadow Charjabug, +15 more. Mirror atkpoint: passing cohort wins 6 of 9 scenarios vs rank-1 SP Guzzlord (2582 IVs pass).

111.28 Atk for Clodsire (Dragon Claw) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.63 Atk for Clodsire (Brutal Swing) vs Clodsire (1v1)
111.35 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1, 2v2)
111.51 Atk for Shadow Sableye (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Sableye (1v1)
111.55 Atk for Vigoroth (Dragon Claw) vs Vigoroth (2v2 with bait)
111.71 Atk for Vigoroth (Brutal Swing) vs Vigoroth (2v2 with bait)
113.78 Atk for Vigoroth (Dragon Tail) vs Vigoroth (2v2 with bait)
110.88 Atk for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (2v2 with bait)
111.17 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
111.76 Atk for Guzzlord (Dragon Tail) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
110.88 Atk for Sableye Mega (Dragon Claw) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0)
111.36 Atk for Sableye Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Sableye (Mega) (1v0)
111.14 Atk for Malamar Mega (Brutal Swing) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
112.49 Atk for Malamar Mega (Dragon Claw) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
113.20 Atk for Malamar Mega (Dragon Tail) vs Malamar (Mega) (0v0)
110.81 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Claw) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.20 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Dragon Tail) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
111.78 Atk for Oinkologne (Female) (Brutal Swing) vs Oinkologne (Female) (0v0)
112.79 Atk for Aegislash Shield (Brutal Swing) vs Aegislash (Shield) (0v0)
110.70 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2 with bait)
110.88 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2 with bait)
111.13 Atk for Shadow Hippowdon (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Hippowdon (2v2 with bait)
110.79 Atk for Turtonator (Dragon Claw) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)
111.01 Atk for Turtonator (Brutal Swing) vs Turtonator (0v1, 2v2)
110.78 Atk for Bombirdier (Dragon Claw) vs Bombirdier (0v0)
112.23 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
112.64 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
113.22 Atk for Shadow Ninetales (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
111.61 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
112.01 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
112.60 Atk for Shadow Charjabug (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Charjabug (2v2 no bait)
113.94 Atk for Corviknight (Dragon Claw) vs Corviknight (1v0)
111.96 Atk for Quagsire (Dragon Claw) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.36 Atk for Quagsire (Dragon Tail) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.94 Atk for Quagsire (Brutal Swing) vs Quagsire (0v0)
112.13 Atk for Mantine (Dragon Claw) vs Mantine (1v1 with bait)
112.62 Atk for Mantine (Brutal Swing) vs Mantine (1v1)
112.80 Atk for Annihilape (Brutal Swing) vs Annihilape (1v0)
112.96 Atk for Annihilape (Dragon Claw) vs Annihilape (1v0)
114.32 Atk for Dondozo (Dragon Claw) vs Dondozo (1v1 with bait)
110.79 Atk for Shadow Hydreigon (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Hydreigon (2v2)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

113.76 Atk flips Shadow Snorlax (1v2 with bait) [3127 IVs]
114.31 Atk flips Toxapex (0v0) [2812 IVs]
114.34 Atk flips Charjabug (1v2 with bait) [2733 IVs]
114.34 Atk flips Shadow Snorlax (0v0) [2733 IVs]
114.34 Atk flips Stunfisk (1v2 no bait) [2733 IVs]
114.31 Atk flips Mandibuzz (0v1) [2812 IVs]
114.34 Atk flips Shadow Vigoroth (2v2 with bait) [2733 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Charjabug (1v2)
vs Mandibuzz (0v1)
vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v2)
vs Stunfisk (1v2)
vs Toxapex (0v0)
vs Shadow Vigoroth (2v2)

Member IVs (2582)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
2/2/0 👑	116.31	61.83	269	#73	+0	+18.3	-12.3	-1.2
10/12/10 👑	115.29	64.63	262	#82	+0	+12.5	-4.1	-1.7
2/1/3 👑	116.31	61.22	271	#85	+0	+17.0	-12.6	-0.8
2/1/4 👑	116.31	61.22	271	#86	+0	+17.0	-12.6	-0.8
7/5/7 👑	116.49	62.13	267	#87	+0	+20.8	-15.6	-0.9
9/13/10 👑	114.71	65.22	262	#141	-10	+7.0	-1.7	-9.6
7/4/11 👑	116.49	61.53	269	#142	+0	+17.7	-15.2	-0.1
7/6/2 👑	116.49	62.73	264	#143	+0	+16.6	-15.1	-1.0
7/6/3 👑	116.49	62.73	264	#144	+0	+16.6	-15.1	-1.0
10/12/9	115.29	64.63	261	#151	+0	+11.7	-6.7	-2.4
10/13/5 👑	115.29	65.22	259	#157	-2	+12.3	-10.4	-3.0
10/13/6 👑	115.29	65.22	259	#158	-2	+12.3	-10.4	-3.0
12/15/13 👑	114.91	65.50	260	#164	-9	+5.3	-1.4	-5.0
9/7/11 👑	116.21	62.53	266	#176	+0	+14.4	-16.1	-5.0
9/7/12 👑	116.21	62.53	266	#177	+0	+14.4	-16.1	-5.0
7/4/9	116.49	61.53	268	#180	+0	+16.1	-16.6	-0.8
7/4/10	116.49	61.53	268	#181	+0	+16.1	-16.6	-0.8
7/3/14 👑	116.49	60.93	271	#184	+0	+14.7	-16.7	-0.6
7/3/15 👑	116.49	60.93	271	#185	+0	+14.7	-16.7	-0.6
9/12/14 👑	114.71	64.63	264	#188	+0	+6.5	-2.7	-7.6
7/5/6	116.49	62.13	266	#189	+0	+15.4	-16.5	-1.3
2/1/2	116.31	61.22	270	#198	+0	+12.5	-13.4	-1.2
9/13/9	114.71	65.22	261	#207	-11	+4.8	-2.7	-9.1
12/12/0 👑	116.46	64.63	256	#213	+0	+15.5	-11.6	+2.4
12/12/1 👑	116.46	64.63	256	#214	+0	+15.5	-11.6	+2.4
9/8/8 👑	116.21	63.12	264	#232	+0	+12.0	-15.7	-7.1
5/6/12 👑	115.30	62.73	270	#235	+0	+10.1	-10.4	-6.9
0/1/13 👑	115.09	61.22	277	#242	+0	+6.5	-9.7	-8.7
2/0/8 👑	116.31	60.60	274	#244	+0	+13.8	-15.8	-3.7
4/7/12 👑	114.70	63.32	270	#245	+0	+7.1	-7.8	-12.0
12/15/11	114.91	65.50	259	#248	-11	+4.6	-4.0	-5.8
12/15/12	114.91	65.50	259	#249	-11	+4.6	-4.0	-5.8
9/15/2 👑	114.71	66.38	257	#250	-11	+5.0	-6.8	-10.9
7/12/0 👑	115.03	65.48	259	#251	-9	+4.6	-4.0	-5.8
9/14/5 👑	114.71	65.80	259	#252	-11	+4.7	-1.6	-9.5
9/14/6 👑	114.71	65.80	259	#253	-11	+4.7	-1.6	-9.5
4/9/4 👑	114.70	64.52	265	#255	+0	+6.2	-3.6	-9.8
6/6/7 👑	115.90	62.73	267	#256	+0	+12.9	-12.5	-7.3
4/10/0	114.70	65.12	262	#268	+0	+4.8	-3.0	-9.3
7/10/8 👑	115.03	64.30	264	#273	+0	+5.4	-5.6	-7.3
7/3/12	116.49	60.93	270	#274	+0	+14.1	-19.3	-1.3
7/3/13	116.49	60.93	270	#275	+0	+14.1	-19.3	-1.3
0/4/0 👑	115.09	63.05	269	#280	+0	+8.0	-9.8	-10.8
5/2/7 👑	116.73	61.09	270	#283	+0	+14.7	-18.4	-0.7
9/12/12	114.71	64.63	263	#288	+0	+4.2	-3.6	-8.6
9/12/13	114.71	64.63	263	#289	+0	+4.2	-3.6	-8.6
12/9/12 👑	116.46	62.89	263	#291	+0	+13.9	-17.3	-1.5
12/9/13 👑	116.46	62.89	263	#292	+0	+13.9	-17.3	-1.5
4/2/12 👑	116.13	61.09	273	#297	+0	+12.7	-14.8	-8.8
9/6/15 👑	116.21	61.94	268	#298	+0	+13.2	-16.5	-7.8
… 2532 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Per-matchup IV finder (193 specific matchups - e.g. "which IV beats a given opponent in a given shield?")

Collapsed by default. This is a per-(opponent, shield) lookup: each card is one matchup and the exact IV spreads that win it. For "what do I need vs threat X" use Threats where your build choice matters above, or paste your collection into the scatter. Composite cards (slayer ∩ tier) surface IVs that satisfy a slayer anchor and a stat-cutoff tier; pure slayer-archetype cards live in the Slayer Builds block below, pure tier cards in the Threshold Tiers above.

Show only notable categories (≤ 5% of cohort or ≤ 5 members). Uncheck to see every non-trivial intersection.

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Cradily Slayer (3 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Cradily Slayer · atk≥119.926, hp≥262

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +4.3, spread 0.4)

13/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 120.08, def 59.14, hp 263, SP #3333

One of 3 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Cradily Slayer threshold (atk≥119.926, hp≥262). Carries top Anchors-First Slayer mirror wins (138/138) AND clears the Cradily Slayer cutoff - no tradeoff.

13/0/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 120.08, def 59.14, hp 264, SP #3119

13/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 120.08, def 59.14, hp 262, SP #3537

One of 3 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Cradily Slayer threshold (atk≥119.926, hp≥262). Trades mirror dominance (115/138 wins, vs 138/138 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Cradily Slayer cutoff.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Cradily Slayer (3 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Cradily Slayer · atk≥119.926, hp≥262

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +4.3, spread 0.4)

13/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 120.08, def 59.14, hp 263, SP #3333

One of 3 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Cradily Slayer threshold (atk≥119.926, hp≥262). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (138/138) AND clears the Cradily Slayer cutoff - no tradeoff.

13/0/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 120.08, def 59.14, hp 264, SP #3119

13/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 120.08, def 59.14, hp 262, SP #3537

One of 3 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Cradily Slayer threshold (atk≥119.926, hp≥262). Trades mirror dominance (115/138 wins, vs 138/138 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Cradily Slayer cutoff.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Annihilape (Shadow) Atk (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Annihilape (Shadow) Atk · atk≥118.525

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +2.1, spread 1.0)

13/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 120.08, def 59.14, hp 263, SP #3333

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Annihilape (Shadow) Atk threshold (atk≥118.525). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (138/138) AND clears the Annihilape (Shadow) Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

13/0/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 120.08, def 59.14, hp 264, SP #3119

15/0/11 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 58.40, hp 266, SP #3551

15/0/12 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 58.40, hp 266, SP #3550

15/0/13 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 58.40, hp 267, SP #3356

15/0/14 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 58.40, hp 267, SP #3355

15/0/15 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 58.40, hp 268, SP #3145

15/1/6 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 58.99, hp 263, SP #3601

15/1/7 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 58.99, hp 263, SP #3600

15/1/8 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 58.99, hp 264, SP #3427

15/1/9 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 58.99, hp 264, SP #3426

15/1/10 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 58.99, hp 265, SP #3213

15/1/11 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 58.99, hp 266, SP #2968

15/2/5 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 59.58, hp 262, SP #3300

15/2/6 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 59.58, hp 263, SP #3066

15/2/7 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 59.58, hp 263, SP #3065

15/3/0 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 60.17, hp 259, SP #3386

15/3/1 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 60.17, hp 260, SP #3166

15/3/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 119.75, def 60.17, hp 260, SP #3165

13/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 120.08, def 59.14, hp 262, SP #3537

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Annihilape (Shadow) Atk threshold (atk≥118.525). Trades mirror dominance (115/138 wins, vs 138/138 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Annihilape (Shadow) Atk cutoff.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Araquanid (Shadow) Atk (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Araquanid (Shadow) Atk · atk≥118.33

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +2.1, spread 1.0)

13/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 120.08, def 59.14, hp 263, SP #3333

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Araquanid (Shadow) Atk threshold (atk≥118.33). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (138/138) AND clears the Araquanid (Shadow) Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.