Mimikyu Ultra League IV Dive

Form change: Mimikyu starts in its Disguise form. The first unshielded charged move it takes is absorbed (reduced to 1 damage), busting the disguise; from then on Mimikyu is in Busted form with a permanent -1 defense for the rest of the battle. This dive simulates the Disguise-intact start, with the bust modeled natively from the gamemaster form-change data.

Opponent list (63 mons)

Tinkaton, Corviknight, Snorlax (Shadow), Corviknight (Shadow), Melmetal, Virizion, Zygarde (Complete Forme), Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow), Mimikyu, Snorlax, Florges, Moltres (Galarian), Feraligatr (Shadow), Feraligatr, Jellicent, Giratina (Altered), Cramorant, Guzzlord, Skeledirge, Rillaboom, Lapras, Lapras (Shadow), Dusknoir, Ninetales (Alolan), Dondozo, Dusknoir (Shadow), Registeel, Blastoise, Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), Forretress, Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), Regidrago, Ninetales, Cresselia, Muk (Alolan), Clefable, Talonflame, Forretress (Shadow), Walrein, Walrein (Shadow), Deoxys (Defense), Runerigus, Steelix, Seaking, Cresselia (Shadow), Steelix (Shadow), Swampert, Toucannon, Milotic (Shadow), Primarina, Ampharos, Cradily (Shadow), Malamar (Shadow), Ampharos (Shadow), Talonflame (Shadow), Bellibolt, Seismitoad, Annihilape, Miltank, Forretress (Bug Bite), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)

Which one to build? [all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (195 spreads, Atk >= 159.00 and Def >= 169.74-169.75 depending on HP (128-131; 4 steps, in the table)) guarantees 54 of the 79 decision matchups; Build 2 (274 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 36 others; Build 1 wide (400 spreads) keeps 46 of Build 1's 54 guaranteed matchups.

Build criteria: the same control as the one in the scatter strip below; either handle moves both

Mimikyu running Shadow Claw / Play Rough, Shadow Sneak.

[all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (195 spreads, Atk >= 159.00 and Def >= 169.74-169.75 depending on HP (128-131; 4 steps, in the table)) guarantees 54 of the 79 decision matchups; Build 2 (274 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 36 others; Build 1 wide (400 spreads) keeps 46 of Build 1's 54 guaranteed matchups.

No single-stat line on this moveset.

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

Atk >= 159.00 + Def/HP staircase (4 steps)

195

54 of 79, 1 of them material; 38 hold under every opponent-IV mode

2v1 Snorlax (outside 12%)

10: 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), 0v0 Muk (Alolan), +8 more

15/15/10 (325 of 567 matchups)

What Build 1 guarantees (54 of 79), its steps and its 195 members

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
128	169
129	169
130	169
131	169

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (6)
- 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 74%
- 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 80%
- 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 80%
- 0v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 87%
- 0v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 89%
- 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 97%
0v1 (6)
- 0v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 34%
- 0v1 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 38%
- 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 46%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 91%
0v2 (1)
- 0v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 80%
1v0 (7)
- 1v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 22%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 41%
- 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 49%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 49%
- 1v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 56%
- 1v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 61%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
1v1 (8)
- 1v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 41%
- 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 61%
- 1v1 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 61%
- 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 67%
- 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 74%
- 1v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 76%
- 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 80%
- 1v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 87%
1v2 (3)
- 1v2 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 77%
- 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 91%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v1 (10)
- 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 12%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 50%
- 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 59%
- 2v1 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 67%
- 2v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 88%
- 2v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 89%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 90%
2v2 (13)
- 2v2 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 31%
- 2v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 33%
- 2v2 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 53%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 56%
- 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 74%
- 2v2 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 74%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 80%
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 88%
- 2v2 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 88%
- 2v2 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 91%

Members (195), highest stat product first

Build 1 wide

Atk >= 157.90 + Def/HP staircase (4 steps)

400

46 of 79, 0 of them material; 30 hold under every opponent-IV mode

18: 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), 0v0 Muk (Alolan), +16 more

What the wider rule keeps and gives up

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
128	167
129	167
130	167
131	167

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 195 spreads in 400 of its own, and keeps 46 of Build 1's 54 guaranteed matchups (none of them material).

The 8 it gives up out here: 2v1 Snorlax (grid 16%), 1v0 Lapras (grid 26%) and 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (grid 51%), and 5 more.

Build 2 (fork)

no two- or three-stat rule fits; 274 spreads by list

274

36 of 79, 0 of them material; 22 hold under every opponent-IV mode

0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (outside 45%)

28: 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), 0v0 Muk (Alolan), +26 more

8/15/15 (312 of 567 matchups)

What Build 2 guarantees (36 of 79), its 274 members

all inside attack IV 7-8, defense IV 0-15, HP IV 7-15; that box also holds 14 spreads that are not members

No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build.

0v0 (5)
- 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 73%
- 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 80%
- 0v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 87%
- 0v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 89%
- 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 97%
0v1 (3)
- 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 45%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 54%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 91%
0v2 (1)
- 0v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 79%
1v0 (3)
- 1v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 55%
- 1v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 56%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
1v1 (7)
- 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 67%
- 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 73%
- 1v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 76%
- 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 79%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 87%
1v2 (2)
- 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 77%
- 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 91%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v1 (7)
- 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 58%
- 2v1 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 67%
- 2v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 88%
- 2v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 88%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 88%
- 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 89%
2v2 (8)
- 2v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 53%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 56%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 73%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 74%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 80%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 87%
- 2v2 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 88%
- 2v2 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 91%

Members (274), highest stat product first

Build 3 (bulk)

Def >= 177.00 and HP >= 135 (bulk box)

35 of 79, 4 of them material; 26 hold under every opponent-IV mode

1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (outside 2%)

29: 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow), 0v0 Rillaboom, +27 more

15/12/15 (332 of 567 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 3 guarantees (35 of 79), its 60 members

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (6)
- 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 11%; material
- 0v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 73%
- 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 80%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 89%
- 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 97%
0v1 (2)
- 0v1 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 24%
- 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 92%
0v2 (2)
- 0v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 51%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 81%
1v0 (2)
- 1v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 50%
- 1v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 57%
1v1 (3)
- 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 2%; material
- 1v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 26%
- 1v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 88%
1v2 (4)
- 1v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 2%; material
- 1v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 43%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 78%
- 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 92%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v1 (8)
- 2v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 52%
- 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 60%
- 2v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 90%
- 2v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 90%
2v2 (8)
- 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 7%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 35%
- 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 55%
- 2v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 81%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 88%
- 2v2 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 89%
- 2v2 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 91%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes

Members (60), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 3 (bulk)'s most-winning spread 15/12/15@50 wins 7 more matchups overall (332 against 325, of 567), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 19 more of the 79 decision matchups (54 against 35).

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

Atk >= 157.90 + Def/HP staircase (4 steps)

350

27 of 44 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 50 of 79 overall, 0 of them material; 33 hold under every opponent-IV mode

2v2 Forretress (outside 28%)

4: 1v0 Lapras, 1v0 Steelix, +2 more

15/15/9 (116 of 189 matchups)

What Build 1 guarantees (27 of 44 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 50 of 79 overall), its steps and its 350 members

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
128	168.9
129	168.9
130	168.9
131	168.9

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (6)
- 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 73%
- 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 79%
- 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 79%
- 0v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 86%
- 0v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 88%
- 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 97%
0v1 (6)
- 0v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 32%
- 0v1 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 35%
- 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 44%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 53%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 91%
0v2 (1)
- 0v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 79%
1v0 (4)
- 1v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 47%
- 1v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 59%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
1v1 (8)
- 1v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 38%
- 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 59%
- 1v1 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 59%
- 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 66%
- 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 73%
- 1v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 75%
- 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 79%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 87%
1v2 (3)
- 1v2 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 77%
- 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 91%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v1 (9)
- 2v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 57%
- 2v1 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 66%
- 2v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 88%
- 2v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 88%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 88%
- 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 88%
- 2v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 90%
2v2 (13)
- 2v2 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 28%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 30%
- 2v2 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 51%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 54%
- 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 73%
- 2v2 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 73%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 79%
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 87%
- 2v2 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 88%
- 2v2 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 90%

Members (350), highest stat product first

Build 1 wide

Atk >= 157.00 and Def >= 168.90 and HP >= 128

756

24 of 44 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 47 of 79 overall, 0 of them material; 30 hold under every opponent-IV mode

7: 0v0 Walrein, 1v0 Lapras, +5 more

What the wider rule keeps and gives up

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 350 spreads in 756 of its own, and keeps 24 of Build 1's 27 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (47 of its 50 overall, none of them material).

The 3 it gives up out here: 2v2 Cramorant (grid 36%), 2v2 Swampert (grid 58%) and 0v0 Walrein (grid 81%).

Build 2 (fork)

no two- or three-stat rule fits; 248 spreads by list

248

21 of 44 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 38 of 79 overall, 0 of them material; 23 hold under every opponent-IV mode

0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (outside 46%)

16: 0v0 Walrein, 0v1 Giratina (Altered), +14 more

8/15/15 (108 of 189 matchups)

What Build 2 guarantees (21 of 44 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 38 of 79 overall), its 248 members

all inside attack IV 7-8, defense IV 2-15, HP IV 7-15; that box also holds 4 spreads that are not members

No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build.

0v0 (5)
- 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 73%
- 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 80%
- 0v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 87%
- 0v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 89%
- 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 97%
0v1 (3)
- 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 46%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 55%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 91%
0v2 (1)
- 0v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 80%
1v0 (3)
- 1v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 55%
- 1v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 56%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
1v1 (7)
- 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 67%
- 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 73%
- 1v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 76%
- 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 80%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 87%
1v2 (2)
- 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 77%
- 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 91%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v1 (8)
- 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 58%
- 2v1 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 67%
- 2v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 88%
- 2v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 88%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 88%
- 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 90%
2v2 (9)
- 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 53%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 56%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 73%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 74%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 80%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 88%
- 2v2 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 88%
- 2v2 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 91%

Members (248), highest stat product first

Build 3 (bulk)

Atk >= 159.00 and Def >= 169.00 and HP >= 128

351

26 of 44 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 53 of 79 overall, 1 of them material; 37 hold under every opponent-IV mode

2v1 Snorlax (outside 8%)

1: 2v2 Cramorant

14/14/15 (121 of 189 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 3 guarantees (26 of 44 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 53 of 79 overall), its 351 members

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (6)
- 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 73%
- 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 79%
- 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 79%
- 0v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 86%
- 0v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 88%
- 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 97%
0v1 (6)
- 0v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 32%
- 0v1 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 35%
- 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 44%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 53%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 91%
0v2 (1)
- 0v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 79%
1v0 (7)
- 1v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 19%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 38%
- 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 46%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 47%
- 1v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 54%
- 1v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 59%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
1v1 (8)
- 1v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 38%
- 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 59%
- 1v1 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 59%
- 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 66%
- 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 73%
- 1v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 75%
- 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 79%
- 1v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 87%
1v2 (3)
- 1v2 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 77%
- 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 91%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v1 (10)
- 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 8%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 48%
- 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 57%
- 2v1 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 66%
- 2v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 88%
- 2v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 88%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 88%
- 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 88%
- 2v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 90%
2v2 (12)
- 2v2 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 28%
- 2v2 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 51%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 54%
- 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 73%
- 2v2 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 73%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 79%
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 87%
- 2v2 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 88%
- 2v2 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 90%

Members (351), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 3 (bulk)'s most-winning spread 14/14/15@50 wins 5 more matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (121 against 116, of 189), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 1 more of the 44 decision matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (27 against 26; 50 against 53 over all 79).

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	~ Atk >= 157.00 and Def + 1.5*HP >= 360.4	1182	8 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 37 of 79 overall, 0 of them material; 22 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v1 Skeledirge (outside 12%)	8: 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow), 1v0 Lapras, +6 more	14/12/15 (39 of 63 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 1 guarantees (8 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 37 of 79 overall), its 1182 members The rule covers 97% of the same spreads (30 extra, 12 missed); the member list is the build. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 65% 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 74% 0v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 82% 0v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 85% 0v1 (4) 0v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 12% 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 21%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 40%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 88% 1v0 (4) 1v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 21%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 31% 1v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 47%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 (8) 1v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 21% 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 47% 1v1 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 47% 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 56% 1v2 (2) 1v2 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 21%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 88%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (7) 2v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 33%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 56% 2v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 84% 2v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 85%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (7) 2v2 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 21%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 39%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 65% 2v2 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 65%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (1182), highest stat product first
Build 2 (fork)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 96 spreads by list	96	8 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 43 of 79 overall, 1 of them material; 25 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v1 Snorlax (outside 14%)	2: 1v2 Cresselia, 2v2 Skeledirge	14/3/6 (35 of 63 matchups)
What Build 2 guarantees (8 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 43 of 79 overall), its 96 members all inside attack IV 13-15, defense IV 3-12, HP IV 0-7; that box also holds 144 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 74% 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 81% 0v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 87% 0v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 89% 0v1 (5) 0v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 36% 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 56%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (6) 1v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 24%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 42% 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 50% 1v1 (8) 1v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 42% 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 62% 1v1 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 62% 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 68% 1v2 (1) 1v2 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (9) 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 14%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 51% 2v1 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 68% 2v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 89% 2v2 (9) 2v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 35% 2v2 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (96), highest stat product first

Rates: outside N% is the share of the spreads NOT in that build that win the same matchup anyway; grid N% (the Notable spreads list and the cards at the top of the page) is the share of all the spreads on the grid. Weight follows the rate: bold = fewer than half of them win it; bold and underlined = fewer than a quarter; bold, underlined and italic = fewer than a tenth; dim = more than nine in ten win it anyway.

Each build's guarantee list is sorted by outside rate: how often the spreads NOT in that build win the same matchup anyway. The lower the rate, the rarer the guarantee.

Against the 35 spreads the mirror-slayer protocol converges on for Mimikyu (attack-first here), no attack on this grid wins charge-move priority against even half of them.

Is mine in one of these?

Paste your Poke Genie CSV, or add one spread by hand, in Check my collection below; the answer comes back here, grouped by build, and your collection stays in your browser.

Shield scenario:

Y: Color:

Stat-product rank against matchups won with PvPoke-default opponent IVs at the league cap over the whole opponent pool and, with Shield scenario on all, every baked shield state -- the view the single-stat line in the expander below was derived on. The Shield scenario selector on this row is the section's own; the scatter's dropdowns and the opponent filter do not drive this panel.

SP1 14/14/15, 15/12/15

Notable spreads

Every single spread this page names, on one list: the spread that wins the most matchups, the one with the highest avg battle score, SP1, and each build's most-winning member. Entries whose decision-matchup wins overlap by 90% or more are merged, because two spreads that win the same matchups are one offer.

15/12/15 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios) and highest avg battle score / Build 3's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 3, which guarantees 35 of the 79 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 0v0 Melmetal (grid 3%), 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (grid 3%) and 0v0 Lapras (Shadow) (grid 4%)

What else is true of 15/12/15

14/14/15 (SP1) and 15/15/10 (Build 1's most-winning member) differ from it by 1 to 4 decision matchups, so this entry is the offer and they are spellings of it.

8/15/15 -- Build 2's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 2, which guarantees 36 of the 63 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 0v0 Melmetal (grid 3%), 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (grid 3%) and 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (grid 4%)

What to do with this: If you already have one of these spreads, build it: each is the top of this grid on the measure that named it. If you are hunting, hunt a build instead.

Wild catches needed to meet one named spread out of the 4096 on this grid: 2839 for a 50% chance, 5678 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

The single-stat line

None of the 5 movesets on this page carries a line. This page is Shadow Claw / Play Rough, Shadow Sneak, and it carries no line; Shadow Claw / Shadow Sneak, Thunder, Shadow Claw / Play Rough, Thunder, Hex / Play Rough, Shadow Sneak and Hex / Shadow Sneak, Thunder carry no line.

Line: none
Closest: Atk >= 155.45 -- 1v0 Melmetal, rank 5, 48 spreads of 4096 on the wrong side
SP1: 14/14/15 -- wins 331 of 567
Alternative: Def >= 177.30 (1024 spreads, 25.0%)
Decision width: 1 matchup

No HP threshold decides a matchup for Mimikyu running Shadow Claw / Play Rough, Shadow Sneak in Ultra League; build for stat product. The closest thing to a line is 155.45 attack in the 1v0 against Melmetal (rank 5). Every one of the 2048 spreads at or above it wins, and 48 of the 2048 below it win too. The attack and defense axes are not tested on this grid: they carry 19 and 20 distinct attainable values in all, and a line needs 20 of them below it.

What bulk does carry is 177.30 defense -- 1024 spreads, 25.0% of the grid. They win 1 contested matchup -- 0v1 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- that at most 1% of the spreads outside them win. SP1, 14/14/15 at L50.0, wins 331 of its 567 matchups, and is inside that pair. The spread winning the most matchups on this grid is 15/12/15 with 332 of 567, so the whole IV decision here is 1 matchup wide.

rank-1

Shield scenario:

Why these regions

Why these regions and not others. The set panel below is every candidate region the builds were cut from. Under it, the same grid grouped by which contested matchups a spread wins -- its win/loss fingerprint, not its score -- drawn on the stat planes where a region is a shape; crossing a breakpoint or bulkpoint moves a spread to the next cluster.

The set panel (an UpSet plot: a bar chart of set intersections, Lex et al. 2014). Left: the named sets the lattice was built from (rows, labelled 'spreads in the set / decision matchups every member of it wins') and the candidate regions made by intersecting them (columns -- bar height is spreads, the number above it is decision matchups guaranteed in the shield scenarios this setting counts, and a coloured column is one of the builds in the table above). A dot means the region sits inside that row's set. The letters index THIS setting's own eight sets and are re-assigned when the Build criteria change, so compare the row names across Build criteria settings, not the letters.

clusters

Shield scenario:

Lattice view: 100% of this dive's IV spreads sit at the same level (L50) -- this species does not reach the league CP cap, so it is pinned at the max power-up level. At a fixed level each battle stat tracks a single IV, so attack / defense / HP each take only ~16 values and the panels look like a sparse grid: each visible point stacks the spreads that share a stat pair (up to 16, one per remaining IV). This is expected, not missing data -- the clustering still runs on the full set of win/loss fingerprints.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3498	154.1	173.4	128	#36-#4096	8.3	-
C1	598	160.5	174.2	129	#1-#3578	15.4	Mimikyu (+86pp), Primarina (+80pp), Shadow Ampharos (+80pp), Shadow Cradily (+69pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Talonflame	41%	100%
Ampharos	54%	61%
Alolan Muk	41%	51%
Seismitoad	54%	100%
Shadow Cradily	27%	96%
Shadow Ampharos	20%	100%
Shadow Milotic	72%	77%
Shadow Corviknight	71%	100%
Walrein	79%	90%
Ninetales	78%	100%
Primarina	7%	87%
Mimikyu	0%	86%
Rillaboom	85%	100%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	11%	22%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	88%	100%
Lapras	0%	64%
Talonflame	0%	43%
Forretress	2%	20%
Shadow Lapras	0%	25%
Blastoise	97%	100%
Melmetal	0%	15%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Talonflame	50%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	100%	named
Ampharos	55%	wins iff hp >= 128	82%	named
Alolan Muk	43%	wins iff sp >= 3,497,769	79%	named
Seismitoad	60%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	83%	named
Shadow Cradily	38%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	100%	named
Shadow Ampharos	32%	wins iff sp >= 3,550,229	81%	named
Shadow Milotic	73%	wins iff hp >= 125	87%	named
Shadow Corviknight	75%	wins iff atk >= 152.09	100%	named
Walrein	81%	wins iff def >= 170.58	94%	named
Ninetales	81%	wins iff atk >= 151.25	100%	named
Primarina	19%	wins iff atk >= 159.66	100%	named
Mimikyu	12%	wins iff atk >= 160.02	100%	named
Rillaboom	88%	wins iff atk >= 150.41	100%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	12%	wins iff sp >= 3,697,301	90%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite)	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,246,469	94%	named
Lapras	9%	wins iff atk >= 160.02	96%	named
Talonflame	6%	wins iff atk >= 160.86	100%	named
Forretress	4%	wins iff sp >= 3,765,416	97%	named
Shadow Lapras	4%	wins iff sp >= 3,800,593	97%	named
Blastoise	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,159,738	99%	named
Melmetal	3%	wins iff sp >= 3,783,426	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	635	152.9	170.3	124	#2585-#4096	1.2	-
C1	1418	151.4	174.5	130	#171-#3914	3.4	Annihilape (+100pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (+100pp), Deoxys (Defense) (+51pp), Forretress (Bug Bite) (+30pp); trades away Virizion (-29pp), Giratina (Altered) (-16pp)
C2	309	159.5	170.2	125	#1531-#3821	5.5	Shadow Cresselia (+100pp), Giratina (Altered) (+100pp), Skeledirge (+98pp), Virizion (+94pp); trades away Annihilape (-100pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (-100pp), Forretress (Bug Bite) (-30pp)
C3	360	155.1	174.5	130	#89-#3033	5.8	Annihilape (+100pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (+100pp), Forretress (Bug Bite) (+31pp), Seaking (+19pp); trades away Giratina (Altered) (-99pp), Skeledirge (-98pp), Shadow Talonflame (-19pp)
C4	1374	158.8	174.5	130	#1-#2954	8.3	Giratina (Altered) (+99pp), Skeledirge (+86pp), Seaking (+46pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2	C3	C4
Shadow Cresselia	2%	0%	100%	97%	97%
Giratina (Altered)	16%	0%	100%	1%	100%
Virizion	35%	6%	100%	100%	100%
Seaking	6%	1%	32%	51%	97%
Skeledirge	8%	0%	98%	0%	86%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	2%	32%	2%	33%	32%
Annihilape	0%	100%	0%	100%	100%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	0%	100%	0%	100%	100%
Deoxys (Defense)	48%	99%	100%	100%	100%
Shadow Talonflame	0%	0%	19%	0%	14%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Cresselia	49%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	93%	named
Giratina (Altered)	44%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Virizion	57%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	99%	named
Seaking	41%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	91%	named
Skeledirge	38%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	100%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite)	25%	wins iff def >= 177.30	100%	named
Annihilape	77%	wins iff sp >= 3,292,715	86%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	77%	wins iff sp >= 3,292,715	86%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	92%	wins iff sp >= 3,220,616	96%	named
Shadow Talonflame	6%	wins iff atk >= 160.86	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1763	151.3	173.3	129	#218-#4096	1.1	-
C1	2333	157.9	173.7	128	#1-#4011	5.7	Corviknight (+95pp), Melmetal (+86pp), Registeel (+83pp), Forretress (+77pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Steelix	18%	76%
Melmetal	2%	88%
Forretress	0%	77%
Steelix	60%	57%
Corviknight	5%	100%
Registeel	15%	98%
Lapras	0%	45%
Miltank	11%	32%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Steelix	51%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	82%	named
Melmetal	51%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	99%	named
Forretress	44%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Steelix	58%	wins iff hp >= 128	96%	named
Corviknight	59%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	97%	named
Registeel	62%	wins iff atk >= 153.77	100%	named
Lapras	26%	wins iff atk >= 158.82	99%	named
Miltank	23%	wins iff sp >= 3,583,780	90%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1536	150.8	173.5	128	#230-#4096	2.9	-
C1	2560	157.6	173.5	128	#1-#4038	9.3	Shadow Alolan Ninetales (+100pp), Shadow Milotic (+100pp), Dondozo (+83pp), Talonflame (+70pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Talonflame	0%	70%
Florges	28%	48%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	0%	100%
Shadow Milotic	0%	100%
Shadow Cradily	0%	60%
Dondozo	17%	100%
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	27%	27%
Tinkaton	33%	100%
Swampert	47%	96%
Galarian Moltres	53%	98%
Cramorant	0%	20%
Shadow Empoleon	73%	97%
Seismitoad	6%	6%
Shadow Dusknoir	4%	4%
Alolan Ninetales	2%	3%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Talonflame	44%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Florges	40%	wins iff sp >= 3,507,306	85%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	62%	wins iff atk >= 153.77	100%	named
Shadow Milotic	62%	wins iff atk >= 153.77	100%	named
Shadow Cradily	38%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	100%	named
Dondozo	69%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	100%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	27%	wins iff def >= 177.30	98%	named
Tinkaton	75%	wins iff atk >= 152.09	100%	named
Swampert	78%	wins iff atk >= 151.25	96%	named
Galarian Moltres	81%	wins iff atk >= 152.09	89%	named
Cramorant	12%	wins iff atk >= 160.02	100%	named
Shadow Empoleon	88%	wins iff sp >= 3,247,086	94%	named
Seismitoad	6%	wins iff sp >= 3,765,416	95%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	4%	wins iff hp >= 135	98%	named
Alolan Ninetales	3%	wins iff sp >= 3,826,908	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2288	155.0	172.5	126	#452-#4096	2.1	-
C1	1808	155.0	174.8	132	#1-#3368	4.6	Guzzlord (+100pp), Galarian Moltres (+69pp), Shadow Cresselia (+38pp), Zygarde (Complete Forme) (+21pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Guzzlord	0%	100%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	44%	44%
Galarian Moltres	10%	80%
Shadow Cresselia	62%	100%
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	5%	27%
Cresselia	85%	100%
Seaking	0%	9%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Guzzlord	44%	wins iff hp >= 129	88%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite)	44%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Galarian Moltres	41%	wins iff hp >= 130	97%	named
Shadow Cresselia	79%	wins iff hp >= 125	91%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	15%	wins iff def >= 177.30	90%	named
Cresselia	92%	wins iff hp >= 123	94%	named
Seaking	4%	wins iff sp >= 3,801,436	97%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	488	150.4	173.2	124	#2284-#4096	2.8	-
C1	3608	155.7	173.6	129	#1-#4059	8.2	Galarian Moltres (+79pp), Steelix (+78pp), Dusknoir (+72pp), Shadow Snorlax (+69pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Florges	0%	59%
Shadow Snorlax	0%	69%
Steelix	0%	78%
Snorlax	0%	18%
Shadow Dusknoir	0%	17%
Alolan Ninetales	59%	93%
Shadow Empoleon	47%	95%
Galarian Moltres	20%	98%
Dusknoir	26%	98%
Mimikyu	0%	12%
Swampert	39%	97%
Empoleon	86%	91%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Florges	52%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	85%	named
Shadow Snorlax	61%	wins iff hp >= 127	97%	named
Steelix	69%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	100%	named
Snorlax	16%	wins iff atk >= 159.66	97%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	15%	wins iff sp >= 3,644,750	92%	named
Alolan Ninetales	89%	wins iff atk >= 150.41	99%	named
Shadow Empoleon	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,249,046	94%	named
Galarian Moltres	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,218,834	92%	named
Dusknoir	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,230,937	94%	named
Mimikyu	10%	wins iff sp >= 3,685,093	94%	named
Swampert	90%	wins iff atk >= 151.25	91%	named
Empoleon	90%	wins iff def >= 168.90	97%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1374	150.7	173.4	128	#377-#4096	6.1	-
C1	2722	157.2	173.6	129	#1-#4038	14.2	Clefable (+85pp), Shadow Cradily (+83pp), Shadow Alolan Ninetales (+75pp), Zygarde (Complete Forme) (+74pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Ninetales	28%	56%
Empoleon	8%	79%
Registeel	0%	66%
Clefable	0%	85%
Shadow Talonflame	47%	61%
Swampert	19%	77%
Galarian Moltres	42%	67%
Shadow Cradily	7%	90%
Cramorant	6%	52%
Forretress	0%	52%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	25%	100%
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	26%	100%
Feraligatr	75%	84%
Bellibolt	0%	21%
Shadow Lapras	0%	19%
Skeledirge	87%	89%
Talonflame	67%	100%
Seismitoad	0%	14%
Shadow Milotic	74%	100%
Alolan Ninetales	1%	12%
Ampharos	95%	96%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Ninetales	46%	wins iff hp >= 129	90%	named
Empoleon	55%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	90%	named
Registeel	44%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Clefable	56%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	100%	named
Shadow Talonflame	56%	wins iff hp >= 130	88%	named
Swampert	58%	wins iff sp >= 3,428,271	86%	named
Galarian Moltres	59%	wins iff hp >= 127	96%	named
Shadow Cradily	62%	wins iff atk >= 153.77	100%	named
Cramorant	36%	wins iff atk >= 157.98	94%	named
Forretress	35%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	91%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	75%	wins iff atk >= 152.09	100%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	75%	wins iff atk >= 152.09	100%	named
Feraligatr	81%	wins iff hp >= 126	94%	named
Bellibolt	14%	wins iff sp >= 3,676,698	89%	named
Shadow Lapras	12%	wins iff atk >= 160.38	100%	named
Skeledirge	88%	wins iff sp >= 3,214,720	91%	named
Talonflame	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,236,704	93%	named
Seismitoad	9%	wins iff atk >= 160.50	97%	named
Shadow Milotic	91%	wins iff sp >= 3,220,616	95%	named
Alolan Ninetales	9%	wins iff sp >= 3,714,818	93%	named
Ampharos	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,130,433	96%	named

all scenarios: 94 win/loss bits (one per contested opponent per scenario) concatenated across 7 of 9 shield scenarios (0v2, 2v0 excluded as degenerate); 1898 distinct win patterns; K=2 clusters (silhouette 0.45); split at atk 155.88.

Sharpest single scenarios on this page: 0v1 shields (K=5, silhouette 0.67 over 10 contested opponents, split atk 155.88) and 1v1 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.61 over 15 contested opponents, split atk 153.35) -- pick them in the dropdown above.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2304	152.1	173.5	128	#89-#4096	33.7	-
C1	1792	158.8	173.5	128	#1-#3934	64.6	Giratina (Altered) [0v1] (+100pp), Forretress [1v0] (+100pp), Talonflame [1v1] (+100pp), Forretress (Bug Bite) [1v2] (+100pp)

Per-cluster win rates vs each contested opponent

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Talonflame [0v0]	11%	100%
Shadow Cresselia [0v1]	16%	92%
Shadow Steelix [1v0]	30%	79%
Melmetal [1v0]	13%	100%
Florges [2v1]	22%	92%
Ninetales [2v2]	44%	49%
Ampharos [0v0]	55%	55%
Empoleon [2v2]	28%	90%
Guzzlord [1v2]	44%	44%
Giratina (Altered) [0v1]	0%	100%
Forretress [1v0]	0%	100%
Talonflame [1v1]	0%	100%
Forretress (Bug Bite) [1v2]	0%	100%
Registeel [2v2]	0%	100%
Clefable [2v2]	22%	100%
Shadow Talonflame [2v2]	56%	56%
Virizion [0v1]	24%	100%
Alolan Muk [0v0]	43%	43%
Swampert [2v2]	37%	85%
Steelix [1v0]	58%	58%
Galarian Moltres [2v2]	56%	62%
Corviknight [1v0]	27%	100%
Galarian Moltres [1v2]	39%	44%
Seaking [0v1]	9%	82%
Florges [1v1]	33%	50%
Seismitoad [0v0]	30%	100%
Shadow Snorlax [2v1]	61%	61%
Shadow Cradily [0v0]	0%	86%
Skeledirge [0v1]	0%	86%
Registeel [1v0]	33%	100%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	33%	100%
Shadow Milotic [1v1]	33%	100%
Shadow Cradily [1v1]	0%	86%
Shadow Cradily [2v2]	33%	100%
Cramorant [2v2]	8%	72%
Forretress [2v2]	0%	79%
Shadow Ampharos [0v0]	22%	44%
Dondozo [1v1]	44%	100%
Steelix [2v1]	44%	100%
Shadow Milotic [0v0]	73%	73%
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [1v1]	27%	27%
Lapras [1v0]	0%	59%
Shadow Corviknight [0v0]	56%	100%
Forretress (Bug Bite) [0v1]	25%	25%
Tinkaton [1v1]	56%	100%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	56%	100%
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [2v2]	56%	100%
Annihilape [0v1]	77%	77%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [0v1]	77%	77%
Miltank [1v0]	11%	38%
Swampert [1v1]	63%	97%
Shadow Cresselia [1v2]	79%	79%
Walrein [0v0]	77%	85%
Galarian Moltres [1v1]	67%	99%
Feraligatr [2v2]	80%	83%
Ninetales [0v0]	67%	100%
Primarina [0v0]	0%	43%
Snorlax [2v1]	0%	36%
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [1v2]	11%	20%
Shadow Dusknoir [2v1]	8%	23%
Bellibolt [2v2]	6%	25%
Mimikyu [0v0]	0%	29%
Rillaboom [0v0]	78%	100%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	12%	12%
Cramorant [1v1]	0%	29%
Shadow Lapras [2v2]	0%	29%
Shadow Empoleon [1v1]	79%	99%
Skeledirge [2v2]	88%	88%
Talonflame [2v2]	80%	100%
Alolan Ninetales [2v1]	80%	100%
Shadow Empoleon [2v1]	81%	100%
Galarian Moltres [2v1]	81%	100%
Forretress (Bug Bite) [0v0]	81%	100%
Dusknoir [2v1]	81%	100%
Mimikyu [2v1]	3%	20%
Swampert [2v1]	82%	100%
Empoleon [2v1]	90%	91%
Lapras [0v0]	0%	21%
Seismitoad [2v2]	0%	21%
Shadow Milotic [2v2]	84%	100%
Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	7%	11%
Deoxys (Defense) [0v1]	85%	100%
Cresselia [1v2]	92%	92%
Seismitoad [1v1]	6%	6%
Talonflame [0v0]	0%	14%
Shadow Talonflame [0v1]	0%	14%
Ampharos [2v2]	95%	95%
Forretress [0v0]	2%	7%
Seaking [1v2]	4%	4%
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	4%	4%
Shadow Lapras [0v0]	0%	8%
Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	2%	3%
Blastoise [0v0]	95%	100%
Melmetal [0v0]	1%	5%

Green tint = the cluster mostly wins that matchup, red tint = mostly loses; the percentage is the share of the cluster's IVs that win.

Stat rules that reproduce the clusters (in-sample accuracy 100.0%)

atk < 155.88:
  -> cluster C0 (n=2304)
atk >= 155.88:
  -> cluster C1 (n=1792)

Depth-3 decision tree over (atk, def, hp). Accuracy is in-sample (regularized by a minimum leaf size), not cross-validated -- read it as "how well the clusters reduce to stat regions", not a prediction claim.

Matchup flip thresholds (candidate anchors)

The single stat and threshold that most accurately predicts win/loss across all IVs -- misclassifications allowed, so it is a diagnostic and a candidate anchor, not a build target. The "flips at" cutoffs under "Threats where your build choice matters" answer the other question (the lowest cutoff whose 75/25 split is clean) and are usually higher for the same opponent.

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Talonflame [0v0]	50%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	100%	named
Shadow Cresselia [0v1]	49%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	93%	named
Shadow Steelix [1v0]	51%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	82%	named
Melmetal [1v0]	51%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	99%	named
Florges [2v1]	52%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	85%	named
Ninetales [2v2]	46%	wins iff hp >= 129	90%	named
Ampharos [0v0]	55%	wins iff hp >= 128	82%	named
Empoleon [2v2]	55%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	90%	named
Guzzlord [1v2]	44%	wins iff hp >= 129	88%	named
Giratina (Altered) [0v1]	44%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Forretress [1v0]	44%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Talonflame [1v1]	44%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite) [1v2]	44%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Registeel [2v2]	44%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Clefable [2v2]	56%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	100%	named
Shadow Talonflame [2v2]	56%	wins iff hp >= 130	88%	named
Virizion [0v1]	57%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	99%	named
Alolan Muk [0v0]	43%	wins iff sp >= 3,497,769	79%	named
Swampert [2v2]	58%	wins iff sp >= 3,428,271	86%	named
Steelix [1v0]	58%	wins iff hp >= 128	96%	named
Galarian Moltres [2v2]	59%	wins iff hp >= 127	96%	named
Corviknight [1v0]	59%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	97%	named
Galarian Moltres [1v2]	41%	wins iff hp >= 130	97%	named
Seaking [0v1]	41%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	91%	named
Florges [1v1]	40%	wins iff sp >= 3,507,306	85%	named
Seismitoad [0v0]	60%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	83%	named
Shadow Snorlax [2v1]	61%	wins iff hp >= 127	97%	named
Shadow Cradily [0v0]	38%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	100%	named
Skeledirge [0v1]	38%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	100%	named
Registeel [1v0]	62%	wins iff atk >= 153.77	100%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	62%	wins iff atk >= 153.77	100%	named
Shadow Milotic [1v1]	62%	wins iff atk >= 153.77	100%	named
Shadow Cradily [1v1]	38%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	100%	named
Shadow Cradily [2v2]	62%	wins iff atk >= 153.77	100%	named
Cramorant [2v2]	36%	wins iff atk >= 157.98	94%	named
Forretress [2v2]	35%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	91%	named
Shadow Ampharos [0v0]	32%	wins iff sp >= 3,550,229	81%	named
Dondozo [1v1]	69%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	100%	named
Steelix [2v1]	69%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	100%	named
Shadow Milotic [0v0]	73%	wins iff hp >= 125	87%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [1v1]	27%	wins iff def >= 177.30	98%	named
Lapras [1v0]	26%	wins iff atk >= 158.82	99%	named
Shadow Corviknight [0v0]	75%	wins iff atk >= 152.09	100%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite) [0v1]	25%	wins iff def >= 177.30	100%	named
Tinkaton [1v1]	75%	wins iff atk >= 152.09	100%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	75%	wins iff atk >= 152.09	100%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [2v2]	75%	wins iff atk >= 152.09	100%	named
Annihilape [0v1]	77%	wins iff sp >= 3,292,715	86%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [0v1]	77%	wins iff sp >= 3,292,715	86%	named
Miltank [1v0]	23%	wins iff sp >= 3,583,780	90%	named
Swampert [1v1]	78%	wins iff atk >= 151.25	96%	named
Shadow Cresselia [1v2]	79%	wins iff hp >= 125	91%	named
Walrein [0v0]	81%	wins iff def >= 170.58	94%	named
Galarian Moltres [1v1]	81%	wins iff atk >= 152.09	89%	named
Feraligatr [2v2]	81%	wins iff hp >= 126	94%	named
Ninetales [0v0]	81%	wins iff atk >= 151.25	100%	named
Primarina [0v0]	19%	wins iff atk >= 159.66	100%	named
Snorlax [2v1]	16%	wins iff atk >= 159.66	97%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [1v2]	15%	wins iff def >= 177.30	90%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [2v1]	15%	wins iff sp >= 3,644,750	92%	named
Bellibolt [2v2]	14%	wins iff sp >= 3,676,698	89%	named
Mimikyu [0v0]	12%	wins iff atk >= 160.02	100%	named
Rillaboom [0v0]	88%	wins iff atk >= 150.41	100%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	12%	wins iff sp >= 3,697,301	90%	named
Cramorant [1v1]	12%	wins iff atk >= 160.02	100%	named
Shadow Lapras [2v2]	12%	wins iff atk >= 160.38	100%	named
Shadow Empoleon [1v1]	88%	wins iff sp >= 3,247,086	94%	named
Skeledirge [2v2]	88%	wins iff sp >= 3,214,720	91%	named
Talonflame [2v2]	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,236,704	93%	named
Alolan Ninetales [2v1]	89%	wins iff atk >= 150.41	99%	named
Shadow Empoleon [2v1]	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,249,046	94%	named
Galarian Moltres [2v1]	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,218,834	92%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite) [0v0]	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,246,469	94%	named
Dusknoir [2v1]	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,230,937	94%	named
Mimikyu [2v1]	10%	wins iff sp >= 3,685,093	94%	named
Swampert [2v1]	90%	wins iff atk >= 151.25	91%	named
Empoleon [2v1]	90%	wins iff def >= 168.90	97%	named
Lapras [0v0]	9%	wins iff atk >= 160.02	96%	named
Seismitoad [2v2]	9%	wins iff atk >= 160.50	97%	named
Shadow Milotic [2v2]	91%	wins iff sp >= 3,220,616	95%	named
Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	9%	wins iff sp >= 3,714,818	93%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [0v1]	92%	wins iff sp >= 3,220,616	96%	named
Cresselia [1v2]	92%	wins iff hp >= 123	94%	named
Seismitoad [1v1]	6%	wins iff sp >= 3,765,416	95%	named
Talonflame [0v0]	6%	wins iff atk >= 160.86	100%	named
Shadow Talonflame [0v1]	6%	wins iff atk >= 160.86	100%	named
Ampharos [2v2]	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,130,433	96%	named
Forretress [0v0]	4%	wins iff sp >= 3,765,416	97%	named
Seaking [1v2]	4%	wins iff sp >= 3,801,436	97%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	4%	wins iff hp >= 135	98%	named
Shadow Lapras [0v0]	4%	wins iff sp >= 3,800,593	97%	named
Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	3%	wins iff sp >= 3,826,908	98%	named
Blastoise [0v0]	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,159,738	99%	named
Melmetal [0v0]	3%	wins iff sp >= 3,783,426	98%	named

Rows are ordered by discriminating power (win rate closest to 50%). "Rule accuracy" is how well that single stat threshold predicts the win/loss across all IVs, and is only shown when it beats always-predicting the majority outcome; high-accuracy UNNAMED rows are candidate new anchors. "Named" means an authored anchor names that opponent (alt-moveset / IV-variant rows inherit their base opponent's anchor).

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1024	150.0	173.5	128	#377-#4096	13.3	-
C1	3072	156.7	173.5	128	#1-#4073	32.5	Shadow Corviknight [0v0] (+100pp), Tinkaton [1v1] (+100pp), Shadow Alolan Ninetales [2v2] (+100pp), Zygarde (Complete Forme) [2v2] (+99pp)

Computed at bake time for moveset SHADOW_CLAW / PLAY_ROUGH, SHADOW_SNEAK with PvPoke default opponent IVs and bait-selective shield play, over the full opponent pool; this does not follow the scatter's moveset / opponent-IV / bait dropdowns or the opponent filter.

How this works

Per shield scenario: an opponent is contested when between 2% and 98% of this dive's IV spreads beat it (everyone else is settled and can't distinguish IVs). Each IV's fingerprint is its win/loss vector over those opponents; fingerprints are clustered bottom-up (agglomerative, Hamming distance, average linkage). The number of clusters, K, is chosen by silhouette -- a 0-to-1 score of how cleanly the fingerprints separate, where above about 0.5 the clusters are distinct groups and below 0.30 the headline says "weak separation" and the clusters are tendencies rather than tiers -- under a parsimony floor (a split must keep every cluster above a minimum size, and the smallest K in 2-6 within 0.03 of the best silhouette wins). Silhouettes are comparable between the scenarios on this page, not between species. Clusters are ordered weakest to strongest by mean contested wins. The scatter panels project the same 4,096 IV spreads onto each pair of battle stats; clusters that overlap completely in score separate cleanly there. A scenario is reported as degenerate (no clustering attempted) when it has fewer than 6 contested opponents or fewer than 8 distinct win patterns -- on that little data every candidate K scores near-perfectly, which is a measurement artifact and not structure -- and its bits are left out of the all scenarios fingerprint. A scenario that clears the floor but has no split keeping every cluster above the minimum size is reported as fragmented instead, and its bits still count toward the combined view. The all scenarios bits are ordered most-discriminating first, which is the tie-break the linkage uses when several merges are equally close. Replaces the retired score-gap cluster heuristic (2026-07), which usually (~77% of sampled runs) fired on float-level jitter in the opponent-averaged score, and even when it did catch a real tier could not name which matchups defined it.

Evidence

1. Header

Mimikyu -- Ultra League

SHADOW_CLAW / PLAY_ROUGH, SHADOW_SNEAK (arm 1 of 5)

Level view: L50. Bake 2026-09-26. Blob 20260926_201817_Mimikyu_ultra.replay.pkl.gz.

Opponent pool: 63 entries (Custom pool from ul_top60.txt (60 mons)). Grid: 4096 IV spreads x 9 shield scenarios.

Opponent-IV settings baked: PvPoke-default opponent IVs; PvPoke-default opponent IVs, focal never baits; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits.

Rankings snapshot 2026-09-26.

2. Floor

28 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

28 single-stat values do separate a cell exactly (27 on attack, 1 on Def, 0 on HP, over 101 contested cells), but none of them clears every gate while splitting between 25% and 60% of the grid, which is what an exact line has to do to carry a floor label.

The closest dirty thresholds on this dive, printed as evidence and not as lines:

At the one decimal place PvPoke and Poke Genie display, the top row reads Atk >= 155.4, which selects 2048 spreads where the exact value selects 2048: 0 more spreads land inside a line printed that way. The table prints the exact value because it is the one that selects the set the counts beside it describe.

A split is listed only when it puts fewer spreads on the wrong side than the constant rule does (predict one outcome for the whole grid) and when it keeps between 10% and 90% of the grid on each side.

cell	rank	closest split	spreads on the wrong side	constant rule gets wrong	wins at/above	wins below
1v0 Melmetal	rank 5	Atk >= 155.45	48	2000	2048 of 2048	48 of 2048
0v1 Cresselia (Shadow)	rank 46	Atk >= 154.61	296	2008	2008 of 2304	0 of 1792
0v1 Virizion	rank 6	Atk >= 154.61	42	1750	2304 of 2304	42 of 1792
1v0 Corviknight	rank 2	Atk >= 154.61	112	1680	2304 of 2304	112 of 1792

3. Lines on the other stats

No axis carries a line on this arm, so there is nothing to compare across them.

4. Example spreads

Existence proofs; each selection rule is printed with its spread.

There is no line on this arm, so the rules run over the whole grid rather than over a set of clearers.

The spread winning the most matchups on this grid is 15/12/15 with 332 of 567, so the whole IV decision here is 1 matchup wide.

rule	IVs	level	Atk / Def / HP	stat product	contested cells	all cells
most cells won on the whole grid	15/12/15	L50.0	161.34 / 177.30 / 135	99.58% (#5)	99	332
highest stat product (the rank-1 spread)	14/14/15	L50.0	160.50 / 178.98 / 135	100.00% (#1)	98	331
bulkiest (max Def x HP) among the whole grid with SP >= 95%	4/15/15	L50.0	152.09 / 179.82 / 135	95.21% (#298)	63	296

Cells won by shield scenario

spread	0v0	0v1	0v2	1v0	1v1	1v2	2v0	2v1	2v2	total
rank-1 14/14/15	41	12	2	62	39	12	63	59	41	331
15/12/15	42	13	2	62	39	12	63	59	40	332
14/14/15	41	12	2	62	39	12	63	59	41	331
4/15/15	33	7	2	58	33	11	63	55	34	296

5. Rank-1 check

Stat-product rank-1 is 14/14/15 at L50.0: 160.50 attack / 178.98 Def / 135 HP. It wins 331 of 567 cells (98 of the 101 contested ones).

There is no floor on this arm, so there is no line for it to be on one side of.

It is a member of the Alternative target below.

6. Alternative target

Def >= 177.30: 1024 spreads (25.0%), stat product 83.0% to 100.0% of rank-1, attack 148.73-161.34.

There is no line on this arm, so there is nothing for the rectangle to be disjoint from. Rule: among (Def, HP) rectangles with at least 100 members, the one winning the most contested cells with EVERY member that at most 1% of the spreads outside it win, counting only cells against a top-50 opponent in a non-degenerate scenario; ties broken by member count. The printed cuts are the least attained values among the members.

Wins 1 contested cell that way: 0v1 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31).

Wild catches needed to land inside this rectangle: 3 for a 50% chance, 5 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

Members win 251-332 cells in total.

IV envelope of the members -- attack IV 0-15, Def IV 12-15, HP IV 0-15. Members per attack IV: 0: 64, 1: 64, 2: 64, 3: 64, 4: 64, 5: 64, 6: 64, 7: 64, 8: 64, 9: 64, 10: 64, 11: 64, 12: 64, 13: 64, 14: 64, 15: 64.

Highest stat product inside it: 14/14/15 at L50.0 (100.00% of rank-1), 13/15/15 at L50.0 (99.94% of rank-1), 14/15/14 at L50.0 (99.73% of rank-1), 15/15/14 at L49.5 (99.65% of rank-1), 15/12/15 at L50.0 (99.58% of rank-1).

7. Cost

This test finds no reverse single-stat clean cut: no cell on this dive is won by every LOW spread and lost by every high one.

8. Rungs above

No floor on this arm, so no ladder above one.

9. Material clean cuts

Clean cuts holding between 10% and 90% of the grid, ascending. The widest of them sit under nearly every spread on the grid; the narrow ones at the bottom of the table do not.

cut	cells owned	spreads	settings	mechanism
Atk >= 150.41	0v0 Rillaboom (rank 21)	3584 (87.5%)	2/4	Mechanism: PLAY_ROUGH damage steps 66 -> 67 across the cut at focal Atk stage -1.
Atk >= 151.25	0v0 Ninetales (rank 34)	3328 (81.2%)	4/4	Mechanism: charge-move priority against Ninetales. That Ninetales is built at 12/15/14, L49.0, 151.19 attack; 1.0 x 151.19 = 151.19, which falls in the gap (150.41, 151.26] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself.
Atk >= 152.09	0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4), 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1), 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30)	3072 (75.0%)	2-4 of 4	0v0 Corviknight (Shadow): Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 5 -> 6 across the cut. 1v1 Tinkaton: Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 4 -> 5 across the cut. 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow): Mechanism: charge-move priority against Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow). That Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) is built at 13/15/14, L47.5, 151.49 attack; 1.0 x 151.49 = 151.49, which falls in the gap (151.25, 152.10] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself.
Atk >= 152.93	1v1 Dondozo (rank 26), 2v1 Steelix (rank 44)	2816 (68.8%)	2/4	1v1 Dondozo: Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 5 -> 6 across the cut. 2v1 Steelix: Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 3 -> 4 across the cut.
Atk >= 153.77	1v0 Registeel (rank 28), 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30), 1v1 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50), +1 more cells	2560 (62.5%)	2-4 of 4	1v0 Registeel: Mechanism: SHADOW_SNEAK damage steps 37 -> 38 across the cut. 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow): Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 4 -> 5 across the cut at focal Atk stage -1. 1v1 Milotic (Shadow): Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 5 -> 6 across the cut.
Atk >= 154.61	2v2 Clefable (rank 37)	2304 (56.2%)	1/4	Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 5 -> 6 across the cut.
Atk >= 155.45	0v0 Talonflame (Shadow) (rank 56)	2048 (50.0%)	4/4	Mechanism: PLAY_ROUGH damage steps 57 -> 58 across the cut.
Atk >= 156.29	0v1 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17), 1v0 Forretress (rank 31), 1v1 Talonflame (rank 38), +2 more cells	1792 (43.8%)	1-4 of 4	0v1 Giratina (Altered): Mechanism: PLAY_ROUGH damage steps 104 -> 105 across the cut. 1v0 Forretress: Mechanism: PLAY_ROUGH damage steps 30 -> 31 across the cut at focal Atk stage -1. 1v1 Talonflame: Mechanism: PLAY_ROUGH damage steps 48 -> 49 across the cut.
Atk >= 157.13	0v0 Cradily (Shadow) (rank 53), 0v1 Skeledirge (rank 20), 1v1 Cradily (Shadow) (rank 53)	1536 (37.5%)	4/4	0v0 Cradily (Shadow): Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 4 -> 5 across the cut at focal Atk stage -1. 0v1 Skeledirge: Mechanism: charge-move priority against Skeledirge. That Skeledirge is built at 6/15/13, L30.5, 156.50 attack; 1.0 x 156.50 = 156.50, which falls in the gap (156.29, 157.14] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself. 1v1 Cradily (Shadow): Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 4 -> 5 across the cut at focal Atk stage -1.
Atk >= 159.65	0v0 Primarina (rank 51)	768 (18.8%)	2/4	Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 5 -> 6 across the cut.
Atk >= 160.01	0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10), 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18)	512 (12.5%)	2-4 of 4	0v0 Mimikyu: Mechanism unattributed: no priority line, damage step or bulkpoint sits in the gap. 1v1 Cramorant: Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 5 -> 6 across the cut.
Atk >= 160.37	2v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23)	511 (12.5%)	2/4	Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 6 -> 7 across the cut.

10. Bulk

Clean cuts by axis: 27 on attack, 1 on Def, 0 on HP.

11. Coverage

Omitted: there is no floor on this arm, so there is no line to place.

12. Mirror

Against the pool's own Mimikyu entry. Seat: our side is the optimised row; the mirror opponent always baits.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 255 0 0 4096 0 0 4096 320 0.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 255 0 0 4096 0 0 4096 320 0.

shields	win rate over the whole grid
0v0	12.5%
0v1	0.0%
0v2	0.0%
1v0	100.0%
1v1	0.0%
1v2	0.0%
2v0	100.0%
2v1	10.2%
2v2	0.0%

13. Changes the score, not the matchup

Cells won (or lost) by every spread where the battle score still steps by at least 60 at one attainable attack value.

Ordered by how close the step comes to the win line (500), nearest first: the question this field answers is how close a cell is to becoming a matchup, not how large the swing inside it is.

12 of 13 steps are listed, closest to the win line first; 1 more are not.

value	cell	rank	score step	points from 500	outcome
Atk >= 155.45	2v2 Blastoise	rank 29	397 -> 490	10 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 154.61	2v2 Toucannon	rank 49	286 -> 471	29 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 154.61	1v2 Virizion	rank 6	395 -> 456	44 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 154.61	1v1 Clefable	rank 37	363 -> 437	63 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 160.49	0v1 Talonflame	rank 38	235 -> 431	69 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 153.77	1v0 Florges	rank 12	588 -> 803	88 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 152.93	2v2 Steelix	rank 44	343 -> 404	96 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 159.65	1v2 Primarina	rank 51	315 -> 376	124 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 151.25	0v1 Ninetales	rank 34	207 -> 371	129 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 154.61	1v0 Snorlax (Shadow)	rank 3	648 -> 729	148 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 151.25	1v0 Ninetales	rank 34	659 -> 827	159 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 154.61	1v1 Virizion	rank 6	711 -> 926	211 (widening)	won on both sides

14. Not claimed

73 of 101 contested matchups have no clean single-stat rule and are not claimed.

6 of 61 top-50 matchups are listed, one per base species and closest to an even split first; 55 more are not.

cell	rank	win rate over the whole grid
0v1 Cresselia (Shadow)	rank 46	49.0%
1v0 Steelix (Shadow)	rank 47	51.1%
1v0 Melmetal	rank 5	51.2%
0v2 Regidrago	rank 33	52.0%
2v1 Florges	rank 12	52.3%
2v2 Ninetales	rank 34	46.1%

15. How sure

27 clean attack cuts, 1 on Def, 0 on HP, over 101 contested cells (233 cells are won by every spread, 233 lost by every spread).

Scenarios barred from carrying a floor -- fewer than 6 contested cells, or fewer than 8 distinct opponent columns among them; the dive page's "degenerate" flag applies the same two numbers to its own stricter counts, so it can flag a different set: 0v2 (2 contested, 3 distinct opponent columns), 2v0 (0 contested, 1 distinct opponent columns).

Independent check: the dive page's matchup clusters, under "Why these regions", which partition this same grid by whole win/loss fingerprint across all 7 non-degenerate shield scenarios, splits it at attack 155.88 (K=2, silhouette 0.45).

Not measured here: opponent IVs outside the baked cohorts, post-match HP and shields, XL or dust cost, and any live-game check of the priority convention.

16. Provenance

Every threshold in this section is one of three things, and each is badged where it is printed. An EXACT clean cut: every spread at or above it wins the named cell and no spread below it does. A ONE-SIDED GATE: one side is pure and the other is at least 97% pure -- either nothing below it wins (clearing it is necessary) or everything at or above it wins (clearing it is sufficient). A NEAR-EXACT split: at most 0.5% of the grid sits on the wrong side of it in total. The win predicate is gopvpsim.battle.is_win (score > 500; 500 itself is a tie, not a win).

That is stricter than the two numbers the dive page prints for the same opponent: the Threats "flips at" boundary (a 75/25 gate, so spreads on the passing side can still lose) and the Matchup clusters flip table's single-stat split for that one opponent (the most accurate such split, misclassifications allowed). The cluster line in "How sure" above is a third thing again: not one opponent but the stat rule that reproduces that section's "all scenarios" partition of the whole grid.

Priority ties: the coverage ladder counts an exact attack tie as NOT beaten. The engine is seat-dependent on an exact tie, so a tied line is not a guarantee in either direction.

Ranks and opponent builds are read live from the 2026-09-26 rankings snapshot and the current gamemaster; this blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so the render is a function of the blob plus those two live reads.

Auto-derived: this section is generated by scripts/deep_dive_brief.py from the replay blob. No human prose is in it.

How the line was selected (gates and guards)

Decision band for the floor (D1): the lowest ELIGIBLE rung whose clearer pool sits inside [25%, 60%] of the grid. Materiality band for a rung: [10%, 90%].

To be ELIGIBLE AS THE FLOOR -- not to be listed as a rung -- a cut needs at least 20 attack/20 defense/5 HP distinct attainable values below it, an opponent of rank 50 or better outside the caveat list, a non-degenerate shield scenario, a win rate at or above the cut of at least 90% in every setting, and a closed-form mechanism. Listing is a weaker bar: a rung is printed when it keeps 25% of the grid (above the floor) or sits in the materiality band (below it) AND points the same way in at least 2 settings, so a listed rung may be unattributed, low-ranked or 2-of-4.

A cut can fail several gates at once, so the failure tally below sums to more than the number of cuts.

Co-gate sub-rectangles need 5% of the grid; the alternative target needs 100 members; a score-only step needs 60 points. These constants are calibrated on one species and are parameters of the stage that uses them, not tuned per dive.

Floor pool by primitive on the attack axis -- the axis the cross-stat rule selected -- each selected on its own under the same band and the same gates: exact -> Atk >= 154.61 (2v2 Clefable, 56.2%) rejected on G-material-gap, G-direction (1 of 4 settings); one-sided gate -> Atk >= 158.81 (1v0 Lapras, 25.0%) rejected on G-material-gap, G-direction (2 of 4 settings); near-exact -> no candidate in the band. Selected: no floor. Selection takes the lowest eligible rung in the band; a stronger primitive within 0.50 stat points of it wins the tie, in the order exact, one-sided gate, near-exact. A gate needs 97% of its dirty side pointing the right way; a near-exact split needs at most 0.5% of the grid on the wrong side. Only exact rungs merge, in either direction.

Degradation ladder: rung reached = c. 28 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

Of 28 clean cuts, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-material-gap 28, G-direction 16, G-rank 6, G-attributed 2, G-material-lo 2.

Of 14 one-sided gate and near-exact candidates, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-material-gap 14, G-material-hi 9, G-attributed 7, G-direction 3.

G-cmp-fresh (WARN, not a failure): 2 cut(s) have a live priority line within 0.50 attack of the cut but outside its gap, so they print unattributed: 0v0 Mimikyu, 0v0 Talonflame. This blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so a rebalance since the bake would look exactly like this.

Closest dirty thresholds on cells with no clean rule: 1v0 Melmetal Atk >= 155.45 (48 spreads on the wrong side); 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) Atk >= 154.61 (296 spreads on the wrong side); 0v1 Virizion Atk >= 154.61 (42 spreads on the wrong side); 1v0 Corviknight Atk >= 154.61 (112 spreads on the wrong side).

band	attack line it selects	cell
[25%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 55%]	no floor	-
[25%, 50%]	no floor	-
[20%, 60%]	no floor	-
[30%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 70%]	no floor	-

Terms used here

build criteria: Which shield scenarios the ranking counts: all nine equally, the three even ones, or 1v1 alone.
build: A region of the IV grid you can aim at -- every spread that clears the same combination of thresholds, at least fifty of them.
guaranteed: Won by every single spread in the region, not by most of them.
decision matchup: A (shield scenario, opponent) pair the IV choice decides: a top-50 opponent that some spreads on this grid beat and others lose to.
wide: The looser rule drawn around a region of the grid: it holds every spread that region holds and more, so it wins less for every member but is easier to hit.
stat-product rank-1 (SP1): The IV spread with the largest attack x defense x HP at this league's CP cap -- the bulk-first spread most IV tools list first. Written SP1 where it is named repeatedly.
staircase: A rule whose defense floor steps DOWN as HP goes up, so bulk can be spent on either stat: one floor per HP value rather than one floor for all of them.
material: A matchup no single-stat threshold of a hundred or more spreads wins more than 95% of the time, so it takes two stats at once to claim it.
opponent-IV mode: One of the ways every opponent was made for this bake -- PvPoke-default IVs or the bulkiest ones, each with and without the focal side baiting -- so a claim that holds in all of them does not depend on how the opponent was made.
stat product: Attack x defense x HP at the league's CP cap, the usual one-number summary of an IV spread.
fork: A second region with no spread in common with the first that wins a noticeably different set of matchups outright -- the two overlap on less than 80% of them -- so they are a real choice rather than two spellings of one.
bulk box: A rule that is a defense floor and an HP floor and nothing else -- a rectangle on the defense / HP plane.
outside rate: How often the spreads left OUT of a region win the same matchup its own members all win -- one the rest of the grid takes anyway is not what you bought.
charge-move priority (CMP): When both sides throw a charged move on the same turn, the higher attack stat goes first.
contested matchups: The matchups some IV spreads on this grid win and others lose -- the only ones an IV choice can change.
UpSet plot: A bar chart of set intersections: each column is one candidate region, and the dots under it mark which named sets it lies inside (Lex et al. 2014).
bulkpoint: A defense value across which an opponent's damage into you steps down by a whole point, or an HP value across which the number of hits they need to knock you out changes.
one-sided gate: A stat value with one clean side: either nothing below it wins the matchup, or everything at or above it does -- so clearing it is required, or enough, but not both.
rung: An attack value above the line at which some further matchup flips for every spread that reaches it.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 160.00 and HP >= 128	479	10 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 51 of 83 overall, 1 of them material; 35 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Lapras (outside 5%)	20: 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), 0v0 Muk (Alolan), +18 more	13/11/14 (39 of 63 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (10 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 51 of 83 overall), its 479 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (7) 0v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 5%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 15%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 79% 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 86% 0v1 (6) 0v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 36% 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 43%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 43% 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 53%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 (1) 0v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 87% 1v0 (6) 1v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 24%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 44% 1v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 54% 1v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 58%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 (10) 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 8% 1v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 43% 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 47%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 65% 1v2 (3) 1v2 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 43%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 85% 2v1 (7) 2v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 58% 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 63% 2v1 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 72% 2v2 (11) 2v2 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 34% 2v2 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 43%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 58%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 65%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (479), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 156.00 and Def + 3.1*HP >= 558.814	1824	8 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 33 of 83 overall, 0 of them material; 19 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	38: 0v0 Mimikyu, 0v0 Lapras, +36 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 479 spreads in 1824 of its own, and keeps 8 of Build 1's 10 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (33 of its 51 overall, none of them material). The 18 it gives up out here: 0v0 Lapras (grid 16%), 1v1 Cramorant (grid 19%) and 0v0 Mimikyu (grid 25%), and 15 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 178.30 and HP >= 136 (bulk box)	51	5 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 42 of 83 overall, 7 of them material; 30 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v2 Empoleon (Shadow) (outside 2%)	29: 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow), 0v0 Mimikyu, +27 more	8/12/15 (38 of 63 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (5 of 13 in 1v1 shields; 42 of 83 overall), its 51 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 17%; material 0v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 83% 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 88%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 (3) 0v1 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 37% 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 64%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 (2) 0v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 64% 0v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 89% 1v0 (2) 1v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 59% 1v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 65% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 5%; material 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 7%; material 1v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 35% 1v2 (5) 1v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 8%; material 1v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 49%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 53%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 86% 2v1 (7) 2v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 62% 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 67% 2v2 (13) 2v2 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 2%; material 2v2 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 3%; material 2v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 5% 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 13%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (51), highest stat product first

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3305	154.7	174.5	129	#2-#4096	8.6	-
C1	791	161.3	174.6	129	#1-#3633	15.6	Talonflame (+95pp), Primarina (+93pp), Mimikyu (+93pp), Lapras (+79pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Cradily	38%	100%
Alolan Muk	54%	56%
Shadow Ampharos	32%	100%
Shadow Talonflame	54%	100%
Ampharos	65%	66%
Seismitoad	60%	100%
Primarina	7%	100%
Mimikyu	7%	100%
Shadow Corviknight	77%	100%
Talonflame	0%	95%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	18%	19%
Shadow Milotic	83%	83%
Lapras	1%	79%
Ninetales	85%	100%
Walrein	87%	93%
Forretress	8%	17%
Shadow Lapras	0%	37%
Rillaboom	92%	100%
Melmetal	4%	13%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	93%	100%
Dondozo	2%	4%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Cradily	50%	wins iff atk >= 156.38	100%	named
Alolan Muk	55%	wins iff hp >= 127	84%	named
Shadow Ampharos	45%	wins iff sp >= 3,545,035	81%	named
Shadow Talonflame	62%	wins iff atk >= 154.69	100%	named
Ampharos	65%	wins iff sp >= 3,431,197	82%	named
Seismitoad	67%	wins iff atk >= 156.38	83%	named
Primarina	25%	wins iff atk >= 159.29	100%	named
Mimikyu	25%	wins iff atk >= 159.76	100%	named
Shadow Corviknight	81%	wins iff atk >= 152.15	100%	named
Talonflame	18%	wins iff atk >= 160.61	100%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	18%	wins iff def >= 177.30	87%	named
Shadow Milotic	83%	wins iff hp >= 125	89%	named
Lapras	16%	wins iff atk >= 160.02	95%	named
Ninetales	88%	wins iff atk >= 151.31	100%	named
Walrein	88%	wins iff def >= 170.75	93%	named
Forretress	10%	wins iff sp >= 3,774,313	94%	named
Shadow Lapras	7%	wins iff sp >= 3,801,101	94%	named
Rillaboom	94%	wins iff atk >= 150.46	100%	named
Melmetal	6%	wins iff sp >= 3,790,314	96%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite)	94%	wins iff sp >= 3,264,845	97%	named
Dondozo	3%	wins iff sp >= 3,867,389	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2113	152.7	174.5	129	#57-#4096	3.7	-
C1	1983	159.4	174.6	129	#1-#3916	8.3	Giratina (Altered) (+97pp), Skeledirge (+90pp), Shadow Cresselia (+80pp), Seaking (+78pp)

Moveset: Switching movesets reloads the page; pasted CSV will need to be re-loaded. Shields: Build criteria: Opponent IVs: Bait: Y-axis: Color: Anchors: Build criteria weights shield scenarios in: Which one to build?, the all-scenarios clusters, and Shields = All (by build criteria). Nothing else on this page is re-weighted by it. Threshold tiers (e.g. GH Great / GH Good) are expert stat-cutoff regions defined in Threshold Tiers below. Hover legend to isolate; click to lock.

Check my collection - Your collection stays in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Paste your Poke Genie CSV export below, or click Choose file… to load one from disk. You’ll see which of your Mimikyus (and pre-evolutions) qualify for each tier, overlaid on the scatter plot.

Show only my mons

Or enter one at a time - Atk/Def/HP IVs (0-15), level, shadow flag. Same format as PvPoke / PvPIVs.

Species Atk Def HP Level Shadow

Compare candidates - up to 7 of your IV spreads, side by side: wins, mirror, and the close calls that decide the build

Add a spread: Atk Def HP 0 / 7 added

Highlight IVs:

Top IVs Rows: Ranked by this dive's battle simulation (not fetched from PvPoke). Click any column header to sort.

Battle-Rating Distribution

Per-matchup battle-rating distribution for the reference IV (PvPoke default or Rank 1, matching the Opponent-IVs dropdown) across the opponent pool, under the currently-selected Shields / Opponent-IVs / Bait.

Shadow Claw / Play Rough, Shadow Sneak

IV Recommendations

Moveset: Shadow Claw / Play Rough, Shadow Sneak. Vs PvPoke default opponents.

IV Flavor Guide (Simulation)

Auto-generated from simulation matchup data. Flavor names (e.g. "Premium Bulk", "Fortified {Opp}", "{Opp} Slayer") are derived from which opponents each IV cluster beats, not from the expert-authored Threshold Tiers section above. This IV Flavor Guide and the Threshold Tiers answer different questions and may not line up 1:1. New to flavor cards? The IV Flavor Guide walks through the six name families and the trade-off layout.

In Ultra League, Mimikyu has 4 flavors: General Good, Fortified Seismitoad, Lapras (Shadow) Slayer, and Ampharos (Shadow) Slayer. In general, the General Good variation may be the flavor of choice, as it plays up Mimikyu's potential vs Ampharos, Annihilape, Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist), among others.

Flavor	IVs	%	Catches needed
General Good [Recommended]	3375	82.4%	almost any will do
Fortified Seismitoad	111	2.7%	~26-51 for a 50-75% chance
Lapras (Shadow) Slayer	479	11.7%	~6-12 for a 50-75% chance
Ampharos (Shadow) Slayer	479	11.7%	~6-12 for a 50-75% chance

General Good (148.87 Atk, 167.24 Def, 123 HP) [Recommended]

167.24 Def and 123 HP is a safe baseline for Mimikyu, with an attack floor of 148.87 Atk for coverage against key opponents.

123 HP is also a safe spot, enabling key matchups vs Ampharos, Annihilape, Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist).

168.06 Def with 123+ HP for Ampharos (incl. Shadow) (0v0), Empoleon (2v1), Florges (1v1), Guzzlord (1v2), Milotic (incl. Shadow) (0v0), Moltres (Galarian) (1v1, 1v2, 2v1, 2v2), Ninetales (2v2), Snorlax (incl. Shadow) (2v1), Steelix (1v0), Walrein (0v0), Muk (Alolan) (0v0), Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
168.90 Def with 127+ HP for Muk (Alolan) (0v0), Regidrago (0v2)
173.10 Def with 129+ HP for the Ninetales (Alolan) (incl. Shadow) (0v0)
173.94 Def with 124+ HP for Miltank (1v0), Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v1), Ninetales (Alolan) (2v2), Regidrago (0v2)
176.46 Def with 129+ HP for Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v1), Ninetales (Alolan) (incl. Shadow) (0v0), Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1), Miltank (1v0)
177.30 Def with 126+ HP for Ninetales (Alolan) (2v2), Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v2), Regidrago (0v2), Empoleon (2v2)
178.45 Def with 127+ HP for the Seismitoad (1v1, 2v2)
179.29 Def with 130+ HP for Annihilape (1v2), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v2)

Fortified Seismitoad (179.29 Def, 130 HP)

The "Fortified Seismitoad" Mimikyu fortifies its bulk to gain several matchups including the Seismitoad 1v1, 2v2, the Annihilape 1v2, the Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) 1v2. This requires 179.29 Def with 130 HP.

Lapras (Shadow) Slayer (160.09 Atk, 123 HP)

The "Lapras (Shadow) Slayer" Mimikyu trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Lapras 0v0, 1v0, the Lapras (Shadow) 2v2, the Ampharos (Shadow) 0v0. Mimikyu would need 160.09 Atk while maintaining 123 HP.

Ampharos (Shadow) Slayer (160.36 Atk, 123 HP)

The "Ampharos (Shadow) Slayer" Mimikyu trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Ampharos (Shadow) 0v0, the Clefable 2v2, the Cramorant 1v1. Mimikyu would need 160.36 Atk while maintaining 123 HP.

Rank-1 Mimikyu (14/14/15) meets the General Good thresholds.

Simulation-Derived IV Tiers

Auto-derived from the sim (not expert-authored).

Threshold Tiers

Stat-target headlines from thresholds/*.toml, each grouped with the named anchors its spec clears and the IV spreads that meet it. Within each tier card, bullets are grouped by opponent and sorted by the required stat (Def or Atk) ascending - read top-to-bottom in the order a player would clear them as their stat grows. The flat list of every anchor (regardless of tier) lives in Anchor-Driven Matchup Flips below. New to tier cards? The Threshold Tiers guide walks through what the stat cutoffs and member counts mean. A tier's anchors come from two passes over the anchor list:

Primary bullets - the tier has a cutoff on the anchor's target axis (atk or def) that meets or exceeds the anchor's threshold. Consequences:
- Subset case: if tier A is strictly stricter than tier B on the anchor axis, A's bullet list is a superset of B's. Overlap is intentional.
- Crossed-cutoff case: tier A has only an atk cutoff, tier B has only a def cutoff - neither is a subset of the other. Atk anchors appear only on A; def anchors only on B.
- Slayer-axis IV-count case: two tiers can list the same atk anchor but have different member-IV counts because a stricter tier's def cutoff excludes def-sacrificing spreads that the looser tier keeps. Check the (−N vs parent) callout on the tier header to spot this at a glance.
Anchors we get for free (collapsed) - the tier has no cutoff on the anchor's target axis, but every IV in the tier clears the anchor's threshold anyway. These would be silently dropped by the primary filter; we surface them in a separate collapsed block so the card isn't misleading.

Fortified Seismitoad · def≥179.29, hp≥130 (111 IV spreads) (−656 vs Walrein (Shadow) Bulk (def-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 125 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Shadow Dusknoir, Empoleon, +18 more. Matchup flips vs Annihilape, Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2 scenarios, 111 IVs).

168.74 Def + 125 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
169.05 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
169.49 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
169.49 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
167.60 Def for Zygarde Complete Forme (Zen Headbutt) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
167.60 Def + 135 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Crunch) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
167.60 Def for Zygarde Complete Forme (Bite) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
167.60 Def + 131 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Earthquake) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
167.60 Def + 131 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Bulldoze) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
169.32 Def + 131 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Hyper Beam) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
172.84 Def + 135 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Outrage) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
176.77 Def for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Tail) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
167.47 Def + 129 HP for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
167.47 Def + 133 HP for Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
167.57 Def + 127 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
168.43 Def + 132 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
168.43 Def + 134 HP for Empoleon (Metal Claw) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
168.43 Def + 134 HP for Empoleon (Metal Sound) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
168.43 Def + 130 HP for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
173.69 Def + 133 HP for Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Empoleon (2v2)
176.85 Def + 132 HP for Empoleon (Steel Wing) vs Empoleon (2v2)
168.22 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (1v1)
168.97 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v1)
169.45 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (1v1)
170.67 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Psychic) vs Florges (1v1)
171.27 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Trailblaze) vs Florges (1v1)
171.65 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Chilling Water) vs Florges (1v1)
168.40 Def + 126 HP for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
168.74 Def + 126 HP for Galarian Moltres (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
169.58 Def + 129 HP for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (1v2, 2v2 with bait)
171.45 Def + 129 HP for Galarian Moltres (Ancient Power) vs Galarian Moltres (1v2 with bait)
167.66 Def + 127 HP for Guzzlord (Sludge Bomb) vs Guzzlord (1v2 with bait)
168.23 Def + 127 HP for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (1v2 with bait)
168.41 Def + 127 HP for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (1v2 with bait)
168.55 Def + 127 HP for Guzzlord (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (1v2 with bait)
173.76 Def + 129 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
174.13 Def + 128 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
174.33 Def + 128 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
174.33 Def + 128 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
176.74 Def + 130 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
177.24 Def + 130 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
177.24 Def + 130 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Charm) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
177.24 Def + 130 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
167.75 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
167.92 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
167.92 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
168.29 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Shadow Punch) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
169.14 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
169.29 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Ominous Wind) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
172.11 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Astonish) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
175.08 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
178.49 Def + 135 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Hex) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
172.32 Def + 129 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
172.45 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
172.45 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
172.62 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
172.92 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
173.62 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
177.24 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Feint Attack) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
167.27 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Scorching Sands) vs Ninetales (2v2)
167.27 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Energy Ball) vs Ninetales (2v2)
167.51 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Solar Beam) vs Ninetales (2v2)
167.78 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Ninetales (2v2)
168.47 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Flamethrower) vs Ninetales (2v2)
168.47 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Fire Blast) vs Ninetales (2v2)
168.47 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Overheat) vs Ninetales (2v2)
168.47 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Ninetales (2v2)
170.09 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Heat Wave) vs Ninetales (2v2)
169.00 Def + 125 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (0v0)
169.34 Def + 125 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (0v0)
169.34 Def + 125 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (0v0)
170.18 Def + 125 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (0v0)
172.06 Def + 125 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (0v0)
168.03 Def for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (0v0)
168.93 Def for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (0v0)
168.93 Def for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (0v0)
169.29 Def for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (0v0)
170.13 Def for Walrein (Powder Snow) vs Walrein (0v0)
167.55 Def + 126 HP for Steelix (Heavy Slam) vs Steelix (1v0)
169.26 Def + 126 HP for Steelix (Earthquake) vs Steelix (1v0)
169.40 Def + 126 HP for Steelix (Crunch) vs Steelix (1v0)
172.96 Def + 134 HP for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (1v2)
172.96 Def + 134 HP for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (1v2)
172.96 Def + 134 HP for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (1v2)
174.78 Def + 134 HP for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (1v2)
178.37 Def + 134 HP for Seaking (Megahorn) vs Seaking (1v2)
168.67 Def + 124 HP for Shadow Milotic (Blizzard) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
167.24 Def + 127 HP for Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Ampharos (0v0)
167.53 Def + 125 HP for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (0v0)
168.05 Def + 125 HP for Ampharos (Thunder) vs Ampharos (0v0)
168.05 Def + 125 HP for Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (0v0)
168.73 Def + 126 HP for Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (0v0)
169.46 Def + 126 HP for Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (0v0)
170.07 Def + 125 HP for Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Ampharos (0v0)
170.29 Def + 125 HP for Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Ampharos (0v0)
167.24 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
167.80 Def + 128 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0, 2v2)
168.41 Def + 130 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0, 2v2)
169.42 Def + 128 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0, 2v2)
169.62 Def + 125 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0, 2v2)
170.29 Def + 128 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0, 2v2)
172.69 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
173.22 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
178.80 Def + 134 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Shadow Ampharos (2v2)
169.07 Def + 132 HP for Seismitoad (Earth Power) vs Seismitoad (1v1)
170.54 Def + 133 HP for Seismitoad (Sludge Bomb) vs Seismitoad (1v1)
171.75 Def + 133 HP for Seismitoad (Icy Wind) vs Seismitoad (1v1)
175.33 Def + 133 HP for Seismitoad (Muddy Water) vs Seismitoad (1v1)
168.50 Def + 133 HP for Miltank (Body Slam) vs Miltank (1v0)
169.04 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (Gyro Ball) vs Miltank (1v0)
169.44 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (Ice Beam) vs Miltank (1v0)
169.44 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (1v0)
170.16 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (High Horsepower) vs Miltank (1v0)
175.48 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (Stomp) vs Miltank (1v0)
176.97 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (Zen Headbutt) vs Miltank (1v0)
175.84 Def + 132 HP for Virizion (Stone Edge) vs Virizion (0v1 no bait)
177.24 Def + 134 HP for Virizion (Leaf Blade) vs Virizion (0v1 no bait)
168.21 Def + 124 HP for Regidrago (Hyper Beam) vs Regidrago (0v2)
168.21 Def for Regidrago (Breaking Swipe) vs Regidrago (0v2 with bait)
176.62 Def for Regidrago (Dragon Pulse) vs Regidrago (0v2 no bait)
176.62 Def for Regidrago (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (0v2 no bait)
178.65 Def for Regidrago (Outrage) vs Regidrago (0v2 no bait)
178.08 Def + 135 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
178.50 Def + 135 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
179.09 Def + 135 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

176.46 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v1) [1280 IVs]
173.94 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v1) [2048 IVs]
179.29 Def + 130 HP flips Annihilape (1v2) [111 IVs]
179.29 Def + 130 HP flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v2) [111 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Annihilape (1v2)
vs Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v2)
vs Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v1)

Member IVs (111)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/15/14 👑	160.50	179.82	134	#3	+3	+0.3	-2.1	-0.8
15/15/14 👑	160.86	179.29	134	#5	+7	+2.2	-2.3	-1.7
15/15/13 👑	161.34	179.82	133	#8	+7	+1.2	-1.7	-3.1
15/15/12	161.34	179.82	132	#15	+5	-2.0	-4.4	-4.7
13/15/15 👑	159.66	179.82	135	#17	+0	-10.8	-3.3	-7.2
14/15/13	160.50	179.82	133	#18	+0	-3.4	-4.2	-4.5
14/15/15	160.02	179.29	134	#26	+1	-11.1	-3.5	-9.6
12/15/15	158.82	179.82	135	#29	-2	-18.1	-3.7	-7.4
13/15/14	159.66	179.82	134	#31	-3	-12.3	-5.8	-8.9
14/15/12	160.50	179.82	132	#33	-1	-6.7	-6.9	-6.2
11/15/15	157.98	179.82	135	#37	+0	-18.7	-4.6	-7.6
15/15/10	161.34	179.82	131	#39	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
15/15/11	161.34	179.82	131	#40	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
12/15/14	158.82	179.82	134	#43	-4	-19.5	-6.2	-9.1
11/15/14	157.98	179.82	134	#57	+0	-20.1	-7.1	-9.3
15/15/9	161.34	179.82	130	#58	-1	-7.5	-9.3	-9.3
10/15/15	157.14	179.82	135	#59	+0	-20.6	-6.9	-9.0
13/15/13	159.66	179.82	133	#72	-8	-15.9	-7.9	-12.5
14/15/10	160.50	179.82	131	#74	-4	-12.5	-10.3	-9.1
14/15/11	160.50	179.82	131	#75	-4	-12.5	-10.3	-9.1
10/15/14	157.14	179.82	134	#83	+0	-22.0	-9.4	-10.6
14/15/9	160.50	179.82	130	#97	-7	-12.1	-11.8	-10.7
12/15/13	158.82	179.82	133	#103	-9	-23.1	-8.3	-12.7
13/15/12	159.66	179.82	132	#113	-11	-19.0	-10.5	-14.1
9/15/15	156.30	179.82	135	#121	+0	-28.0	-13.2	-9.4
11/15/13	157.98	179.82	133	#123	+0	-23.6	-9.2	-12.9
12/15/12	158.82	179.82	132	#148	-12	-26.2	-11.0	-14.3
9/15/14	156.30	179.82	134	#161	+0	-29.4	-15.7	-11.1
10/15/13	157.14	179.82	133	#163	+0	-25.5	-11.4	-14.3
11/15/12	157.98	179.82	132	#175	+0	-26.8	-11.9	-14.5
13/15/10	159.66	179.82	131	#185	-13	-25.1	-14.1	-16.9
13/15/11	159.66	179.82	131	#186	-13	-25.1	-14.1	-16.9
13/15/9	159.66	179.82	130	#230	-16	-24.5	-15.6	-18.5
12/15/10	158.82	179.82	131	#243	-15	-32.2	-14.6	-17.3
12/15/11	158.82	179.82	131	#244	-15	-32.2	-14.6	-17.3
10/15/12	157.14	179.82	132	#253	+0	-28.6	-14.1	-20.0
11/15/10	157.98	179.82	131	#264	+0	-29.8	-15.5	-17.6
11/15/11	157.98	179.82	131	#265	+0	-29.8	-15.5	-17.6
9/15/13	156.30	179.82	133	#280	+0	-32.8	-17.7	-14.8
8/15/15	155.46	179.82	135	#283	+0	-34.1	-18.0	-18.0
12/15/9	158.82	179.82	130	#291	-18	-31.6	-16.1	-18.9
11/15/9	157.98	179.82	130	#328	+0	-29.2	-17.0	-19.1
8/15/14	155.46	179.82	134	#357	+0	-35.4	-20.5	-19.8
10/15/10	157.14	179.82	131	#376	+0	-31.7	-17.7	-26.2
10/15/11	157.14	179.82	131	#377	+0	-31.7	-17.7	-26.2
9/15/12	156.30	179.82	132	#389	+0	-36.0	-20.4	-20.5
7/15/15	154.62	179.82	135	#410	+0	-39.2	-22.2	-19.4
10/15/9	157.14	179.82	130	#444	+0	-31.1	-19.2	-27.7
7/15/14	154.62	179.82	134	#498	+0	-40.5	-24.7	-21.2
8/15/13	155.46	179.82	133	#525	+0	-38.8	-22.4	-23.3
… 61 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Lapras (Shadow) Slayer · atk≥160.09, hp≥123 (479 IV spreads) (−289 vs Primarina Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 92 anchors across 6 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Bellibolt, Clefable, Corviknight, +36 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Lapras (Shadow) (3 scenario flips).

149.52 Atk for Tinkaton (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (1v1)
151.54 Atk for Tinkaton (Shadow Claw) vs Tinkaton (1v1)
151.54 Atk for Tinkaton (Shadow Sneak) vs Tinkaton (1v1)
154.03 Atk for Corviknight (Shadow Sneak) vs Corviknight (1v0)
155.00 Atk for Corviknight (Play Rough) vs Corviknight (1v0)
150.15 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0)
151.36 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0)
151.77 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Play Rough) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0)
151.29 Atk for Melmetal (Play Rough) vs Melmetal (1v0)
151.29 Atk for Melmetal (Shadow Sneak) vs Melmetal (1v0)
152.26 Atk for Virizion (Play Rough) vs Virizion (0v1 with bait)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Shadow Sneak) vs Virizion (0v1 with bait)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Shadow Claw) vs Virizion (0v1 with bait)
149.19 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Play Rough) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
150.51 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Shadow Sneak) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Shadow Claw) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
154.57 Atk for Empoleon (Shadow Sneak) vs Empoleon (2v2)
154.57 Atk for Empoleon (Play Rough) vs Empoleon (2v2)
158.89 Atk for Snorlax (Play Rough) vs Snorlax (2v1)
153.52 Atk for Florges (Shadow Sneak) vs Florges (2v1)
154.04 Atk for Florges (Play Rough) vs Florges (2v1)
156.65 Atk for Florges (Shadow Claw) vs Florges (2v1)
148.88 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Shadow Sneak) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1)
150.08 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Play Rough) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1)
154.18 Atk for Giratina Altered (Play Rough) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v1 with bait)
154.48 Atk for Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v1 with bait)
157.17 Atk for Giratina Altered (Shadow Claw) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v1 with bait)
157.67 Atk for Cramorant (Play Rough) vs Cramorant (1v1, 2v2)
158.52 Atk for Cramorant (Shadow Sneak) vs Cramorant (2v2 with bait)
159.80 Atk for Cramorant (Shadow Claw) vs Cramorant (1v1)
151.50 Atk for Skeledirge (Shadow Sneak) vs Skeledirge (0v1)
151.50 Atk for Skeledirge (Shadow Claw) vs Skeledirge (0v1)
151.91 Atk for Skeledirge (Play Rough) vs Skeledirge (0v1)
148.93 Atk for Rillaboom (Play Rough) vs Rillaboom (0v0)
150.38 Atk for Rillaboom (Shadow Sneak) vs Rillaboom (0v0)
157.95 Atk for Lapras (Play Rough) vs Lapras (1v0)
158.80 Atk for Lapras (Shadow Sneak) vs Lapras (1v0)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Play Rough) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
149.62 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Play Rough) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
150.11 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Sneak) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
150.54 Atk for Dondozo (Play Rough) vs Dondozo (1v1)
151.35 Atk for Dondozo (Shadow Sneak) vs Dondozo (1v1)
152.57 Atk for Dondozo (Shadow Claw) vs Dondozo (1v1)
153.74 Atk for Registeel (Shadow Sneak) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v2)
155.12 Atk for Registeel (Play Rough) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v2)
155.82 Atk for Registeel (Shadow Claw) vs Registeel (2v2)
149.21 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Play Rough) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
149.62 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
153.30 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1)
153.80 Atk for Forretress (Play Rough) vs Forretress (1v0, 2v2)
155.88 Atk for Forretress (Shadow Claw) vs Forretress (1v0, 2v2)
155.88 Atk for Forretress (Shadow Sneak) vs Forretress (1v0, 2v2)
149.28 Atk for Ninetales (Shadow Sneak) vs Ninetales (0v0)
151.83 Atk for Clefable (Play Rough) vs Clefable (2v2)
152.65 Atk for Clefable (Shadow Sneak) vs Clefable (2v2)
153.89 Atk for Clefable (Shadow Claw) vs Clefable (2v2 with bait)
153.84 Atk for Talonflame (Shadow Sneak) vs Talonflame (1v1)
156.28 Atk for Talonflame (Play Rough) vs Talonflame (1v1)
150.64 Atk for Steelix (Shadow Sneak) vs Steelix (2v1)
152.00 Atk for Steelix (Play Rough) vs Steelix (2v1)
152.68 Atk for Steelix (Shadow Claw) vs Steelix (2v1)
153.19 Atk for Seaking (Play Rough) vs Seaking (0v1)
153.58 Atk for Seaking (Shadow Sneak) vs Seaking (0v1)
153.26 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Play Rough) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
154.46 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
153.81 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Play Rough) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
156.07 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
148.97 Atk for Swampert (Play Rough) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2)
149.78 Atk for Swampert (Shadow Sneak) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2)
150.98 Atk for Swampert (Shadow Claw) vs Swampert (1v1)
151.62 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Play Rough) vs Shadow Milotic (1v1)
152.44 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Milotic (1v1)
153.67 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Milotic (1v1)
159.24 Atk for Primarina (Shadow Claw) vs Primarina (0v0)
159.24 Atk for Primarina (Play Rough) vs Primarina (0v0)
152.19 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Play Rough) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
152.61 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
156.36 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1)
154.65 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Play Rough) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
154.65 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
149.54 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Play Rough) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
149.43 Atk for Jellicent (Shadow Sneak) vs Jellicent (1v1)
149.43 Atk for Jellicent (Play Rough) vs Jellicent (1v1)
148.87 Atk for Dusknoir (Play Rough) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
149.66 Atk for Dusknoir (Shadow Sneak) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
150.27 Atk for Alolan Muk (Shadow Sneak) vs Alolan Muk (1v0)
150.35 Atk for Alolan Muk (Play Rough) vs Alolan Muk (1v0)
151.55 Atk for Walrein (Play Rough) vs Walrein (0v0)
151.55 Atk for Walrein (Shadow Sneak) vs Walrein (0v0)
149.23 Atk for Ampharos (Play Rough) vs Ampharos (1v1)
149.42 Atk for Bellibolt (Play Rough) vs Bellibolt (0v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

154.62 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (1v2) [2304 IVs]
160.02 Atk flips Shadow Ampharos (0v0) [512 IVs]
160.02 Atk flips Mimikyu (0v0) [512 IVs]
160.02 Atk + 123 HP flips Seismitoad (2v2) [480 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
vs Mimikyu (0v0)
vs Seismitoad (2v2)

Member IVs (479)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/12/15 👑	161.34	177.30	135	#1	+6	+3.0	+2.3	-1.2
14/14/15 👑	160.50	178.98	135	#2	+2	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
14/15/14 👑	160.50	179.82	134	#3	+3	+0.3	-2.1	-0.8
14/13/15	160.50	178.14	135	#4	+0	-0.9	+0.5	-2.0
15/15/14 👑	160.86	179.29	134	#5	+7	+2.2	-2.3	-1.7
14/12/15	160.50	177.30	135	#6	-1	-1.6	-0.1	-2.7
15/13/14 👑	161.34	178.14	134	#7	+5	+0.1	-1.4	-3.1
15/15/13 👑	161.34	179.82	133	#8	+7	+1.2	-1.7	-3.1
15/12/14	161.34	177.30	134	#9	+4	-0.4	-2.0	-3.7
14/14/14	160.50	178.98	134	#10	+0	-1.5	-2.6	-2.1
15/14/14	160.86	178.45	134	#11	+3	+1.1	-3.3	-4.3
15/14/15	160.86	178.45	134	#12	+3	+1.1	-3.3	-4.3
15/14/13	161.34	178.98	133	#13	+4	-0.6	-2.1	-4.4
14/13/14	160.50	178.14	134	#14	-2	-4.5	-3.9	-4.6
15/15/12	161.34	179.82	132	#15	+5	-2.0	-4.4	-4.7
15/13/15	160.86	177.61	134	#16	+2	-1.8	-4.3	-4.9
14/15/13	160.50	179.82	133	#18	+0	-3.4	-4.2	-4.5
15/11/15	161.34	176.46	135	#19	-1	-1.4	-2.2	-8.1
15/13/13	161.34	178.14	133	#20	+1	-3.4	-3.0	-5.0
15/15/15	160.38	178.75	134	#21	-3	-3.3	-3.4	-8.3
14/12/14	160.50	177.30	134	#22	-3	-5.0	-4.5	-5.2
15/12/13	161.34	177.30	133	#23	-1	-4.0	-4.9	-5.6
15/10/15	161.34	175.62	135	#25	-1	-3.6	-2.7	-8.6
14/14/13	160.50	178.98	133	#27	-3	-5.3	-4.6	-5.8
15/9/15	161.34	174.78	135	#28	-1	-3.9	-2.9	-9.1
15/14/12	161.34	178.98	132	#30	+1	-3.5	-4.8	-6.1
14/15/12	160.50	179.82	132	#33	-1	-6.7	-6.9	-6.2
14/11/15	160.50	176.46	135	#35	-8	-6.0	-4.6	-9.6
14/13/13	160.50	178.14	133	#36	-6	-8.0	-5.5	-6.4
15/15/10	161.34	179.82	131	#39	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
15/15/11	161.34	179.82	131	#40	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
15/8/15	161.34	173.94	135	#41	-4	-6.2	-4.0	-9.7
15/13/12	161.34	178.14	132	#42	-1	-6.3	-7.8	-6.9
14/12/13	160.50	177.30	133	#45	-7	-8.5	-7.4	-7.1
14/10/15	160.50	175.62	135	#47	-8	-8.2	-5.1	-10.0
15/12/12	161.34	177.30	132	#48	-2	-6.8	-8.4	-7.5
14/9/15	160.50	174.78	135	#50	-8	-8.5	-5.3	-10.6
14/14/12	160.50	178.98	132	#51	-5	-8.3	-7.3	-7.6
15/12/10	161.34	177.30	131	#53	-3	-8.3	+1.8	-10.4
15/12/11	161.34	177.30	131	#54	-3	-8.3	+1.8	-10.4
15/14/10	161.34	178.98	131	#55	-1	-8.6	-8.2	-9.2
15/14/11	161.34	178.98	131	#56	-1	-8.6	-8.2	-9.2
15/15/9	161.34	179.82	130	#58	-1	-7.5	-9.3	-9.3
15/7/15	161.34	173.10	135	#60	-7	-6.8	-6.6	-10.1
15/11/14	161.34	176.46	134	#61	-4	-6.8	-6.8	-10.9
15/14/9	161.34	178.98	130	#63	-2	-8.1	+1.9	-10.8
15/6/15	161.34	172.26	135	#64	-7	-7.3	-6.8	-10.2
15/10/14	161.34	175.62	134	#66	-6	-7.0	-8.5	-10.4
15/13/10	161.34	178.14	131	#67	-3	-7.8	-9.1	-9.8
15/13/11	161.34	178.14	131	#68	-3	-7.8	-9.1	-9.8
… 429 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Ampharos (Shadow) Slayer · atk≥160.36, hp≥123 (479 IV spreads) (−289 vs Primarina Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 95 anchors across 6 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Bellibolt, Clefable, +37 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Ampharos (Shadow) (1 scenario flip).

149.52 Atk for Tinkaton (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (1v1)
151.54 Atk for Tinkaton (Shadow Claw) vs Tinkaton (1v1)
151.54 Atk for Tinkaton (Shadow Sneak) vs Tinkaton (1v1)
154.03 Atk for Corviknight (Shadow Sneak) vs Corviknight (1v0)
155.00 Atk for Corviknight (Play Rough) vs Corviknight (1v0)
150.15 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0)
151.36 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0)
151.77 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Play Rough) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0)
151.29 Atk for Melmetal (Play Rough) vs Melmetal (1v0)
151.29 Atk for Melmetal (Shadow Sneak) vs Melmetal (1v0)
152.26 Atk for Virizion (Play Rough) vs Virizion (0v1 with bait)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Shadow Sneak) vs Virizion (0v1 with bait)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Shadow Claw) vs Virizion (0v1 with bait)
149.19 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Play Rough) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
150.51 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Shadow Sneak) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Shadow Claw) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
154.57 Atk for Empoleon (Shadow Sneak) vs Empoleon (2v2)
154.57 Atk for Empoleon (Play Rough) vs Empoleon (2v2)
158.89 Atk for Snorlax (Play Rough) vs Snorlax (2v1)
153.52 Atk for Florges (Shadow Sneak) vs Florges (2v1)
154.04 Atk for Florges (Play Rough) vs Florges (2v1)
156.65 Atk for Florges (Shadow Claw) vs Florges (2v1)
148.88 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Shadow Sneak) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1)
150.08 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Play Rough) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1)
154.18 Atk for Giratina Altered (Play Rough) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v1 with bait)
154.48 Atk for Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v1 with bait)
157.17 Atk for Giratina Altered (Shadow Claw) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v1 with bait)
157.67 Atk for Cramorant (Play Rough) vs Cramorant (1v1, 2v2)
158.52 Atk for Cramorant (Shadow Sneak) vs Cramorant (2v2 with bait)
159.80 Atk for Cramorant (Shadow Claw) vs Cramorant (1v1)
151.50 Atk for Skeledirge (Shadow Sneak) vs Skeledirge (0v1)
151.50 Atk for Skeledirge (Shadow Claw) vs Skeledirge (0v1)
151.91 Atk for Skeledirge (Play Rough) vs Skeledirge (0v1)
148.93 Atk for Rillaboom (Play Rough) vs Rillaboom (0v0)
150.38 Atk for Rillaboom (Shadow Sneak) vs Rillaboom (0v0)
157.95 Atk for Lapras (Play Rough) vs Lapras (1v0)
158.80 Atk for Lapras (Shadow Sneak) vs Lapras (1v0)
160.09 Atk for Lapras (Shadow Claw) vs Lapras (1v0)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Play Rough) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
149.62 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Play Rough) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
150.11 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Sneak) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
150.54 Atk for Dondozo (Play Rough) vs Dondozo (1v1)
151.35 Atk for Dondozo (Shadow Sneak) vs Dondozo (1v1)
152.57 Atk for Dondozo (Shadow Claw) vs Dondozo (1v1)
153.74 Atk for Registeel (Shadow Sneak) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v2)
155.12 Atk for Registeel (Play Rough) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v2)
155.82 Atk for Registeel (Shadow Claw) vs Registeel (2v2)
149.21 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Play Rough) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
149.62 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
153.30 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1)
153.80 Atk for Forretress (Play Rough) vs Forretress (1v0, 2v2)
155.88 Atk for Forretress (Shadow Claw) vs Forretress (1v0, 2v2)
155.88 Atk for Forretress (Shadow Sneak) vs Forretress (1v0, 2v2)
149.28 Atk for Ninetales (Shadow Sneak) vs Ninetales (0v0)
151.83 Atk for Clefable (Play Rough) vs Clefable (2v2)
152.65 Atk for Clefable (Shadow Sneak) vs Clefable (2v2)
153.89 Atk for Clefable (Shadow Claw) vs Clefable (2v2 with bait)
153.84 Atk for Talonflame (Shadow Sneak) vs Talonflame (1v1)
156.28 Atk for Talonflame (Play Rough) vs Talonflame (1v1)
150.64 Atk for Steelix (Shadow Sneak) vs Steelix (2v1)
152.00 Atk for Steelix (Play Rough) vs Steelix (2v1)
152.68 Atk for Steelix (Shadow Claw) vs Steelix (2v1)
153.19 Atk for Seaking (Play Rough) vs Seaking (0v1)
153.58 Atk for Seaking (Shadow Sneak) vs Seaking (0v1)
153.26 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Play Rough) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
154.46 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
153.81 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Play Rough) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
156.07 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
148.97 Atk for Swampert (Play Rough) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2)
149.78 Atk for Swampert (Shadow Sneak) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2)
150.98 Atk for Swampert (Shadow Claw) vs Swampert (1v1)
151.62 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Play Rough) vs Shadow Milotic (1v1)
152.44 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Milotic (1v1)
153.67 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Milotic (1v1)
159.24 Atk for Primarina (Shadow Claw) vs Primarina (0v0)
159.24 Atk for Primarina (Play Rough) vs Primarina (0v0)
152.19 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Play Rough) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
152.61 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
156.36 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1)
160.36 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Play Rough) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
154.65 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Play Rough) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
154.65 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
149.54 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Play Rough) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
149.43 Atk for Jellicent (Shadow Sneak) vs Jellicent (1v1)
149.43 Atk for Jellicent (Play Rough) vs Jellicent (1v1)
148.87 Atk for Dusknoir (Play Rough) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
149.66 Atk for Dusknoir (Shadow Sneak) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
150.27 Atk for Alolan Muk (Shadow Sneak) vs Alolan Muk (1v0)
150.35 Atk for Alolan Muk (Play Rough) vs Alolan Muk (1v0)
151.55 Atk for Walrein (Play Rough) vs Walrein (0v0)
151.55 Atk for Walrein (Shadow Sneak) vs Walrein (0v0)
149.23 Atk for Ampharos (Play Rough) vs Ampharos (1v1)
149.42 Atk for Bellibolt (Play Rough) vs Bellibolt (0v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

154.62 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (1v2) [2304 IVs]
160.02 Atk flips Mimikyu (0v0) [512 IVs]
160.02 Atk + 123 HP flips Seismitoad (2v2) [480 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Mimikyu (0v0)
vs Seismitoad (2v2)

Member IVs (479)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/12/15 👑	161.34	177.30	135	#1	+6	+3.0	+2.3	-1.2
14/14/15 👑	160.50	178.98	135	#2	+2	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
14/15/14 👑	160.50	179.82	134	#3	+3	+0.3	-2.1	-0.8
14/13/15	160.50	178.14	135	#4	+0	-0.9	+0.5	-2.0
15/15/14 👑	160.86	179.29	134	#5	+7	+2.2	-2.3	-1.7
14/12/15	160.50	177.30	135	#6	-1	-1.6	-0.1	-2.7
15/13/14 👑	161.34	178.14	134	#7	+5	+0.1	-1.4	-3.1
15/15/13 👑	161.34	179.82	133	#8	+7	+1.2	-1.7	-3.1
15/12/14	161.34	177.30	134	#9	+4	-0.4	-2.0	-3.7
14/14/14	160.50	178.98	134	#10	+0	-1.5	-2.6	-2.1
15/14/14	160.86	178.45	134	#11	+3	+1.1	-3.3	-4.3
15/14/15	160.86	178.45	134	#12	+3	+1.1	-3.3	-4.3
15/14/13	161.34	178.98	133	#13	+4	-0.6	-2.1	-4.4
14/13/14	160.50	178.14	134	#14	-2	-4.5	-3.9	-4.6
15/15/12	161.34	179.82	132	#15	+5	-2.0	-4.4	-4.7
15/13/15	160.86	177.61	134	#16	+2	-1.8	-4.3	-4.9
14/15/13	160.50	179.82	133	#18	+0	-3.4	-4.2	-4.5
15/11/15	161.34	176.46	135	#19	-1	-1.4	-2.2	-8.1
15/13/13	161.34	178.14	133	#20	+1	-3.4	-3.0	-5.0
15/15/15	160.38	178.75	134	#21	-3	-3.3	-3.4	-8.3
14/12/14	160.50	177.30	134	#22	-3	-5.0	-4.5	-5.2
15/12/13	161.34	177.30	133	#23	-1	-4.0	-4.9	-5.6
15/10/15	161.34	175.62	135	#25	-1	-3.6	-2.7	-8.6
14/14/13	160.50	178.98	133	#27	-3	-5.3	-4.6	-5.8
15/9/15	161.34	174.78	135	#28	-1	-3.9	-2.9	-9.1
15/14/12	161.34	178.98	132	#30	+1	-3.5	-4.8	-6.1
14/15/12	160.50	179.82	132	#33	-1	-6.7	-6.9	-6.2
14/11/15	160.50	176.46	135	#35	-8	-6.0	-4.6	-9.6
14/13/13	160.50	178.14	133	#36	-6	-8.0	-5.5	-6.4
15/15/10	161.34	179.82	131	#39	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
15/15/11	161.34	179.82	131	#40	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
15/8/15	161.34	173.94	135	#41	-4	-6.2	-4.0	-9.7
15/13/12	161.34	178.14	132	#42	-1	-6.3	-7.8	-6.9
14/12/13	160.50	177.30	133	#45	-7	-8.5	-7.4	-7.1
14/10/15	160.50	175.62	135	#47	-8	-8.2	-5.1	-10.0
15/12/12	161.34	177.30	132	#48	-2	-6.8	-8.4	-7.5
14/9/15	160.50	174.78	135	#50	-8	-8.5	-5.3	-10.6
14/14/12	160.50	178.98	132	#51	-5	-8.3	-7.3	-7.6
15/12/10	161.34	177.30	131	#53	-3	-8.3	+1.8	-10.4
15/12/11	161.34	177.30	131	#54	-3	-8.3	+1.8	-10.4
15/14/10	161.34	178.98	131	#55	-1	-8.6	-8.2	-9.2
15/14/11	161.34	178.98	131	#56	-1	-8.6	-8.2	-9.2
15/15/9	161.34	179.82	130	#58	-1	-7.5	-9.3	-9.3
15/7/15	161.34	173.10	135	#60	-7	-6.8	-6.6	-10.1
15/11/14	161.34	176.46	134	#61	-4	-6.8	-6.8	-10.9
15/14/9	161.34	178.98	130	#63	-2	-8.1	+1.9	-10.8
15/6/15	161.34	172.26	135	#64	-7	-7.3	-6.8	-10.2
15/10/14	161.34	175.62	134	#66	-6	-7.0	-8.5	-10.4
15/13/10	161.34	178.14	131	#67	-3	-7.8	-9.1	-9.8
15/13/11	161.34	178.14	131	#68	-3	-7.8	-9.1	-9.8
… 429 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Walrein (Shadow) Bulk · def≥178.08 (767 IV spreads)

Clears 119 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Shadow Dusknoir, Empoleon, +18 more. Bulkpoint(s) vs Walrein (Shadow) (5 scenario flips).

168.74 Def + 125 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
169.05 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
169.49 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
169.49 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
167.60 Def for Zygarde Complete Forme (Zen Headbutt) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
167.60 Def + 135 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Crunch) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
167.60 Def for Zygarde Complete Forme (Bite) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
167.60 Def + 131 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Earthquake) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
167.60 Def + 131 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Bulldoze) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
169.32 Def + 131 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Hyper Beam) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
172.84 Def + 135 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Outrage) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
176.77 Def for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Tail) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
167.47 Def + 129 HP for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
167.47 Def + 133 HP for Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
167.57 Def + 132 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
168.43 Def + 132 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
168.43 Def + 134 HP for Empoleon (Metal Claw) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
168.43 Def + 134 HP for Empoleon (Metal Sound) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
168.43 Def + 130 HP for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
173.69 Def + 133 HP for Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Empoleon (2v2)
176.85 Def + 132 HP for Empoleon (Steel Wing) vs Empoleon (2v2)
168.22 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (1v1)
168.97 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v1)
169.45 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (1v1)
170.67 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Psychic) vs Florges (1v1)
171.27 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Trailblaze) vs Florges (1v1)
171.65 Def + 128 HP for Florges (Chilling Water) vs Florges (1v1)
168.40 Def + 126 HP for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
168.74 Def + 126 HP for Galarian Moltres (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 1v2, 2v2)
169.58 Def + 129 HP for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (1v2, 2v2 with bait)
171.45 Def + 129 HP for Galarian Moltres (Ancient Power) vs Galarian Moltres (1v2 with bait)
167.66 Def + 127 HP for Guzzlord (Sludge Bomb) vs Guzzlord (1v2 with bait)
168.23 Def + 127 HP for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (1v2 with bait)
168.41 Def + 127 HP for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (1v2 with bait)
168.55 Def + 127 HP for Guzzlord (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (1v2 with bait)
173.76 Def + 129 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
174.13 Def + 128 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
174.33 Def + 128 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
174.33 Def + 128 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
176.74 Def + 130 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
177.24 Def + 130 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
177.24 Def + 130 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Charm) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
177.24 Def + 130 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
167.75 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
167.92 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
167.92 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
168.29 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Shadow Punch) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
169.14 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
169.29 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Ominous Wind) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
172.11 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Astonish) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
175.08 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
172.32 Def + 129 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
172.45 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
172.45 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
172.62 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
172.92 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
173.62 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
177.24 Def + 127 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Feint Attack) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
167.27 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Scorching Sands) vs Ninetales (2v2)
167.27 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Energy Ball) vs Ninetales (2v2)
167.51 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Solar Beam) vs Ninetales (2v2)
167.78 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Ninetales (2v2)
168.47 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Flamethrower) vs Ninetales (2v2)
168.47 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Fire Blast) vs Ninetales (2v2)
168.47 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Overheat) vs Ninetales (2v2)
168.47 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Ninetales (2v2)
170.09 Def + 127 HP for Ninetales (Heat Wave) vs Ninetales (2v2)
169.00 Def + 125 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (0v0)
169.34 Def + 125 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (0v0)
169.34 Def + 125 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (0v0)
170.18 Def + 125 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (0v0)
172.06 Def + 125 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (0v0)
168.03 Def for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (0v0)
168.93 Def for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (0v0)
168.93 Def for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (0v0)
169.29 Def for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (0v0)
170.13 Def for Walrein (Powder Snow) vs Walrein (0v0)
167.55 Def + 126 HP for Steelix (Heavy Slam) vs Steelix (1v0)
169.26 Def + 126 HP for Steelix (Earthquake) vs Steelix (1v0)
169.40 Def + 126 HP for Steelix (Crunch) vs Steelix (1v0)
172.96 Def + 134 HP for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (1v2)
172.96 Def + 134 HP for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (1v2)
172.96 Def + 134 HP for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (1v2)
174.78 Def + 134 HP for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (1v2)
168.67 Def + 124 HP for Shadow Milotic (Blizzard) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
167.24 Def + 127 HP for Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Ampharos (0v0)
167.53 Def + 125 HP for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (0v0)
168.05 Def + 125 HP for Ampharos (Thunder) vs Ampharos (0v0)
168.05 Def + 125 HP for Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (0v0)
168.73 Def + 126 HP for Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (0v0)
169.46 Def + 126 HP for Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (0v0)
170.07 Def + 125 HP for Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Ampharos (0v0)
170.29 Def + 125 HP for Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Ampharos (0v0)
167.24 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
167.80 Def + 128 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0, 2v2)
168.41 Def + 130 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0, 2v2)
169.42 Def + 128 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0, 2v2)
169.62 Def + 125 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0, 2v2)
170.29 Def + 128 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0, 2v2)
172.69 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
173.22 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
169.07 Def + 132 HP for Seismitoad (Earth Power) vs Seismitoad (1v1)
170.54 Def + 134 HP for Seismitoad (Sludge Bomb) vs Seismitoad (1v1)
171.75 Def + 133 HP for Seismitoad (Icy Wind) vs Seismitoad (1v1)
175.33 Def + 133 HP for Seismitoad (Muddy Water) vs Seismitoad (1v1)
168.50 Def + 133 HP for Miltank (Body Slam) vs Miltank (1v0)
169.04 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (Gyro Ball) vs Miltank (1v0)
169.44 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (Ice Beam) vs Miltank (1v0)
169.44 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (1v0)
170.16 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (High Horsepower) vs Miltank (1v0)
175.48 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (Stomp) vs Miltank (1v0)
176.97 Def + 132 HP for Miltank (Zen Headbutt) vs Miltank (1v0)
175.84 Def + 134 HP for Virizion (Stone Edge) vs Virizion (0v1 no bait)
177.24 Def + 134 HP for Virizion (Leaf Blade) vs Virizion (0v1 no bait)
168.21 Def + 124 HP for Regidrago (Hyper Beam) vs Regidrago (0v2)
168.21 Def for Regidrago (Breaking Swipe) vs Regidrago (0v2 with bait)
176.62 Def for Regidrago (Dragon Pulse) vs Regidrago (0v2 no bait)
176.62 Def for Regidrago (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (0v2 no bait)
178.08 Def + 135 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

176.46 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v1) [1280 IVs]
173.94 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v1) [2048 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v1)

Member IVs (767)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/14/15 👑	160.50	178.98	135	#2	+2	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
14/15/14 👑	160.50	179.82	134	#3	+3	+0.3	-2.1	-0.8
14/13/15	160.50	178.14	135	#4	+0	-0.9	+0.5	-2.0
15/15/14 👑	160.86	179.29	134	#5	+7	+2.2	-2.3	-1.7
15/13/14 👑	161.34	178.14	134	#7	+5	+0.1	-1.4	-3.1
15/15/13 👑	161.34	179.82	133	#8	+7	+1.2	-1.7	-3.1
14/14/14	160.50	178.98	134	#10	+0	-1.5	-2.6	-2.1
15/14/14	160.86	178.45	134	#11	+3	+1.1	-3.3	-4.3
15/14/15	160.86	178.45	134	#12	+3	+1.1	-3.3	-4.3
15/14/13	161.34	178.98	133	#13	+4	-0.6	-2.1	-4.4
14/13/14	160.50	178.14	134	#14	-2	-4.5	-3.9	-4.6
15/15/12	161.34	179.82	132	#15	+5	-2.0	-4.4	-4.7
13/15/15 👑	159.66	179.82	135	#17	+0	-10.8	-3.3	-7.2
14/15/13	160.50	179.82	133	#18	+0	-3.4	-4.2	-4.5
15/13/13	161.34	178.14	133	#20	+1	-3.4	-3.0	-5.0
15/15/15	160.38	178.75	134	#21	-3	-3.3	-3.4	-8.3
13/14/15	159.66	178.98	135	#24	-3	-12.5	-3.7	-8.1
14/15/15	160.02	179.29	134	#26	+1	-11.1	-3.5	-9.6
14/14/13	160.50	178.98	133	#27	-3	-5.3	-4.6	-5.8
12/15/15	158.82	179.82	135	#29	-2	-18.1	-3.7	-7.4
15/14/12	161.34	178.98	132	#30	+1	-3.5	-4.8	-6.1
13/15/14	159.66	179.82	134	#31	-3	-12.3	-5.8	-8.9
13/13/15	159.66	178.14	135	#32	-6	-13.5	-3.3	-10.2
14/15/12	160.50	179.82	132	#33	-1	-6.7	-6.9	-6.2
14/13/13	160.50	178.14	133	#36	-6	-8.0	-5.5	-6.4
11/15/15	157.98	179.82	135	#37	+0	-18.7	-4.6	-7.6
12/14/15	158.82	178.98	135	#38	-5	-19.8	-4.1	-8.3
15/15/10	161.34	179.82	131	#39	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
15/15/11	161.34	179.82	131	#40	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
15/13/12	161.34	178.14	132	#42	-1	-6.3	-7.8	-6.9
12/15/14	158.82	179.82	134	#43	-4	-19.5	-6.2	-9.1
13/14/14	159.66	178.98	134	#44	-6	-13.9	-6.2	-10.2
12/13/15	158.82	178.14	135	#46	-8	-20.8	-3.7	-10.4
11/14/15	157.98	178.98	135	#49	+0	-20.5	-5.0	-8.5
14/14/12	160.50	178.98	132	#51	-5	-8.3	-7.3	-7.6
15/14/10	161.34	178.98	131	#55	-1	-8.6	-8.2	-9.2
15/14/11	161.34	178.98	131	#56	-1	-8.6	-8.2	-9.2
11/15/14	157.98	179.82	134	#57	+0	-20.1	-7.1	-9.3
15/15/9	161.34	179.82	130	#58	-1	-7.5	-9.3	-9.3
10/15/15	157.14	179.82	135	#59	+0	-20.6	-6.9	-9.0
11/13/15	157.98	178.14	135	#62	+0	-21.5	-4.6	-10.6
15/14/9	161.34	178.98	130	#63	-2	-8.1	+1.9	-10.8
13/13/14	159.66	178.14	134	#65	-9	-17.0	-7.6	-12.6
15/13/10	161.34	178.14	131	#67	-3	-7.8	-9.1	-9.8
15/13/11	161.34	178.14	131	#68	-3	-7.8	-9.1	-9.8
12/14/14	158.82	178.98	134	#70	-7	-21.2	-6.7	-10.4
13/15/13	159.66	179.82	133	#72	-8	-15.9	-7.9	-12.5
14/15/10	160.50	179.82	131	#74	-4	-12.5	-10.3	-9.1
14/15/11	160.50	179.82	131	#75	-4	-12.5	-10.3	-9.1
14/13/12	160.50	178.14	132	#76	-7	-10.8	-10.3	-8.4
… 717 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Primarina Atk · atk≥159.24 (768 IV spreads)

Clears 89 anchors across 6 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Bellibolt, Clefable, Corviknight, +35 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Primarina (3 scenario flips).

149.52 Atk for Tinkaton (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (1v1)
151.54 Atk for Tinkaton (Shadow Claw) vs Tinkaton (1v1)
151.54 Atk for Tinkaton (Shadow Sneak) vs Tinkaton (1v1)
154.03 Atk for Corviknight (Shadow Sneak) vs Corviknight (1v0)
155.00 Atk for Corviknight (Play Rough) vs Corviknight (1v0)
150.15 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0)
151.36 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0)
151.77 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Play Rough) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0)
151.29 Atk for Melmetal (Play Rough) vs Melmetal (1v0)
151.29 Atk for Melmetal (Shadow Sneak) vs Melmetal (1v0)
152.26 Atk for Virizion (Play Rough) vs Virizion (0v1 with bait)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Shadow Sneak) vs Virizion (0v1 with bait)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Shadow Claw) vs Virizion (0v1 with bait)
149.19 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Play Rough) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
150.51 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Shadow Sneak) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Shadow Claw) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
154.57 Atk for Empoleon (Shadow Sneak) vs Empoleon (2v2)
154.57 Atk for Empoleon (Play Rough) vs Empoleon (2v2)
158.89 Atk for Snorlax (Play Rough) vs Snorlax (2v1)
153.52 Atk for Florges (Shadow Sneak) vs Florges (2v1)
154.04 Atk for Florges (Play Rough) vs Florges (2v1)
156.65 Atk for Florges (Shadow Claw) vs Florges (2v1)
148.88 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Shadow Sneak) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1)
150.08 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Play Rough) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1)
154.18 Atk for Giratina Altered (Play Rough) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v1 with bait)
154.48 Atk for Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v1 with bait)
157.17 Atk for Giratina Altered (Shadow Claw) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v1 with bait)
157.67 Atk for Cramorant (Play Rough) vs Cramorant (2v2)
158.52 Atk for Cramorant (Shadow Sneak) vs Cramorant (2v2 with bait)
151.50 Atk for Skeledirge (Shadow Sneak) vs Skeledirge (0v1)
151.50 Atk for Skeledirge (Shadow Claw) vs Skeledirge (0v1)
151.91 Atk for Skeledirge (Play Rough) vs Skeledirge (0v1)
148.93 Atk for Rillaboom (Play Rough) vs Rillaboom (0v0)
150.38 Atk for Rillaboom (Shadow Sneak) vs Rillaboom (0v0)
157.95 Atk for Lapras (Play Rough) vs Lapras (1v0)
158.80 Atk for Lapras (Shadow Sneak) vs Lapras (1v0)
149.62 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Play Rough) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
150.11 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Sneak) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
150.54 Atk for Dondozo (Play Rough) vs Dondozo (1v1)
151.35 Atk for Dondozo (Shadow Sneak) vs Dondozo (1v1)
152.57 Atk for Dondozo (Shadow Claw) vs Dondozo (1v1)
153.74 Atk for Registeel (Shadow Sneak) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v2)
155.12 Atk for Registeel (Play Rough) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v2)
155.82 Atk for Registeel (Shadow Claw) vs Registeel (2v2)
149.21 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Play Rough) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
149.62 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v2)
153.30 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1)
153.80 Atk for Forretress (Play Rough) vs Forretress (1v0, 2v2)
155.88 Atk for Forretress (Shadow Claw) vs Forretress (1v0, 2v2)
155.88 Atk for Forretress (Shadow Sneak) vs Forretress (1v0, 2v2)
149.28 Atk for Ninetales (Shadow Sneak) vs Ninetales (0v0)
151.83 Atk for Clefable (Play Rough) vs Clefable (2v2 with bait)
152.65 Atk for Clefable (Shadow Sneak) vs Clefable (2v2 with bait)
153.89 Atk for Clefable (Shadow Claw) vs Clefable (2v2 with bait)
153.84 Atk for Talonflame (Shadow Sneak) vs Talonflame (1v1)
156.28 Atk for Talonflame (Play Rough) vs Talonflame (1v1)
150.64 Atk for Steelix (Shadow Sneak) vs Steelix (2v1)
152.00 Atk for Steelix (Play Rough) vs Steelix (2v1)
152.68 Atk for Steelix (Shadow Claw) vs Steelix (2v1)
153.19 Atk for Seaking (Play Rough) vs Seaking (0v1)
153.58 Atk for Seaking (Shadow Sneak) vs Seaking (0v1)
153.26 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Play Rough) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
154.46 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
153.81 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Play Rough) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
156.07 Atk for Shadow Steelix (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Steelix (1v0)
148.97 Atk for Swampert (Play Rough) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2)
149.78 Atk for Swampert (Shadow Sneak) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2)
150.98 Atk for Swampert (Shadow Claw) vs Swampert (1v1)
151.62 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Play Rough) vs Shadow Milotic (1v1)
152.44 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Milotic (1v1)
153.67 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Milotic (1v1)
159.24 Atk for Primarina (Shadow Claw) vs Primarina (0v0)
159.24 Atk for Primarina (Play Rough) vs Primarina (0v0)
152.19 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Play Rough) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
152.61 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
156.36 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1)
154.65 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Play Rough) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
154.65 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
149.54 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Play Rough) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
149.43 Atk for Jellicent (Shadow Sneak) vs Jellicent (1v1)
149.43 Atk for Jellicent (Play Rough) vs Jellicent (1v1)
148.87 Atk for Dusknoir (Play Rough) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
149.66 Atk for Dusknoir (Shadow Sneak) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
150.27 Atk for Alolan Muk (Shadow Sneak) vs Alolan Muk (1v0)
150.35 Atk for Alolan Muk (Play Rough) vs Alolan Muk (1v0)
151.55 Atk for Walrein (Play Rough) vs Walrein (0v0)
151.55 Atk for Walrein (Shadow Sneak) vs Walrein (0v0)
149.23 Atk for Ampharos (Play Rough) vs Ampharos (1v1)
149.42 Atk for Bellibolt (Play Rough) vs Bellibolt (0v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

154.62 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (1v2) [2304 IVs]

Member IVs (768)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/12/15 👑	161.34	177.30	135	#1	+6	+3.0	+2.3	-1.2
14/14/15 👑	160.50	178.98	135	#2	+2	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
14/15/14 👑	160.50	179.82	134	#3	+3	+0.3	-2.1	-0.8
14/13/15	160.50	178.14	135	#4	+0	-0.9	+0.5	-2.0
15/15/14 👑	160.86	179.29	134	#5	+7	+2.2	-2.3	-1.7
14/12/15	160.50	177.30	135	#6	-1	-1.6	-0.1	-2.7
15/13/14 👑	161.34	178.14	134	#7	+5	+0.1	-1.4	-3.1
15/15/13 👑	161.34	179.82	133	#8	+7	+1.2	-1.7	-3.1
15/12/14	161.34	177.30	134	#9	+4	-0.4	-2.0	-3.7
14/14/14	160.50	178.98	134	#10	+0	-1.5	-2.6	-2.1
15/14/14	160.86	178.45	134	#11	+3	+1.1	-3.3	-4.3
15/14/15	160.86	178.45	134	#12	+3	+1.1	-3.3	-4.3
15/14/13	161.34	178.98	133	#13	+4	-0.6	-2.1	-4.4
14/13/14	160.50	178.14	134	#14	-2	-4.5	-3.9	-4.6
15/15/12	161.34	179.82	132	#15	+5	-2.0	-4.4	-4.7
15/13/15	160.86	177.61	134	#16	+2	-1.8	-4.3	-4.9
13/15/15 👑	159.66	179.82	135	#17	+0	-10.8	-3.3	-7.2
14/15/13	160.50	179.82	133	#18	+0	-3.4	-4.2	-4.5
15/11/15	161.34	176.46	135	#19	-1	-1.4	-2.2	-8.1
15/13/13	161.34	178.14	133	#20	+1	-3.4	-3.0	-5.0
15/15/15	160.38	178.75	134	#21	-3	-3.3	-3.4	-8.3
14/12/14	160.50	177.30	134	#22	-3	-5.0	-4.5	-5.2
15/12/13	161.34	177.30	133	#23	-1	-4.0	-4.9	-5.6
13/14/15	159.66	178.98	135	#24	-3	-12.5	-3.7	-8.1
15/10/15	161.34	175.62	135	#25	-1	-3.6	-2.7	-8.6
14/15/15	160.02	179.29	134	#26	+1	-11.1	-3.5	-9.6
14/14/13	160.50	178.98	133	#27	-3	-5.3	-4.6	-5.8
15/9/15	161.34	174.78	135	#28	-1	-3.9	-2.9	-9.1
15/14/12	161.34	178.98	132	#30	+1	-3.5	-4.8	-6.1
13/15/14	159.66	179.82	134	#31	-3	-12.3	-5.8	-8.9
13/13/15	159.66	178.14	135	#32	-6	-13.5	-3.3	-10.2
14/15/12	160.50	179.82	132	#33	-1	-6.7	-6.9	-6.2
13/12/15	159.66	177.30	135	#34	-7	-14.1	-3.8	-10.8
14/11/15	160.50	176.46	135	#35	-8	-6.0	-4.6	-9.6
14/13/13	160.50	178.14	133	#36	-6	-8.0	-5.5	-6.4
15/15/10	161.34	179.82	131	#39	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
15/15/11	161.34	179.82	131	#40	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
15/8/15	161.34	173.94	135	#41	-4	-6.2	-4.0	-9.7
15/13/12	161.34	178.14	132	#42	-1	-6.3	-7.8	-6.9
13/14/14	159.66	178.98	134	#44	-6	-13.9	-6.2	-10.2
14/12/13	160.50	177.30	133	#45	-7	-8.5	-7.4	-7.1
14/10/15	160.50	175.62	135	#47	-8	-8.2	-5.1	-10.0
15/12/12	161.34	177.30	132	#48	-2	-6.8	-8.4	-7.5
14/9/15	160.50	174.78	135	#50	-8	-8.5	-5.3	-10.6
14/14/12	160.50	178.98	132	#51	-5	-8.3	-7.3	-7.6
15/12/10	161.34	177.30	131	#53	-3	-8.3	+1.8	-10.4
15/12/11	161.34	177.30	131	#54	-3	-8.3	+1.8	-10.4
15/14/10	161.34	178.98	131	#55	-1	-8.6	-8.2	-9.2
15/14/11	161.34	178.98	131	#56	-1	-8.6	-8.2	-9.2
15/15/9	161.34	179.82	130	#58	-1	-7.5	-9.3	-9.3
… 718 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

General · atk≥148.87, def≥167.24 (3600 IV spreads)

Clears 2 anchors across 1 shield scenario, covering Shadow Ampharos, Dusknoir. Floor across 41 atk breakpoint opponents + 22 bulkpoint opponents. Clears the easiest anchor for every opponent.

167.24 Def + 133 HP for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
148.87 Atk for Dusknoir (Play Rough) vs Dusknoir (0v0)

Member IVs (3600)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/12/15 👑	161.34	177.30	135	#1	+6	+3.0	+2.3	-1.2
14/14/15 👑	160.50	178.98	135	#2	+2	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
14/15/14 👑	160.50	179.82	134	#3	+3	+0.3	-2.1	-0.8
14/13/15	160.50	178.14	135	#4	+0	-0.9	+0.5	-2.0
15/15/14 👑	160.86	179.29	134	#5	+7	+2.2	-2.3	-1.7
14/12/15	160.50	177.30	135	#6	-1	-1.6	-0.1	-2.7
15/13/14 👑	161.34	178.14	134	#7	+5	+0.1	-1.4	-3.1
15/15/13 👑	161.34	179.82	133	#8	+7	+1.2	-1.7	-3.1
15/12/14	161.34	177.30	134	#9	+4	-0.4	-2.0	-3.7
14/14/14	160.50	178.98	134	#10	+0	-1.5	-2.6	-2.1
15/14/14	160.86	178.45	134	#11	+3	+1.1	-3.3	-4.3
15/14/15	160.86	178.45	134	#12	+3	+1.1	-3.3	-4.3
15/14/13	161.34	178.98	133	#13	+4	-0.6	-2.1	-4.4
14/13/14	160.50	178.14	134	#14	-2	-4.5	-3.9	-4.6
15/15/12	161.34	179.82	132	#15	+5	-2.0	-4.4	-4.7
15/13/15	160.86	177.61	134	#16	+2	-1.8	-4.3	-4.9
13/15/15 👑	159.66	179.82	135	#17	+0	-10.8	-3.3	-7.2
14/15/13	160.50	179.82	133	#18	+0	-3.4	-4.2	-4.5
15/11/15	161.34	176.46	135	#19	-1	-1.4	-2.2	-8.1
15/13/13	161.34	178.14	133	#20	+1	-3.4	-3.0	-5.0
15/15/15	160.38	178.75	134	#21	-3	-3.3	-3.4	-8.3
14/12/14	160.50	177.30	134	#22	-3	-5.0	-4.5	-5.2
15/12/13	161.34	177.30	133	#23	-1	-4.0	-4.9	-5.6
13/14/15	159.66	178.98	135	#24	-3	-12.5	-3.7	-8.1
15/10/15	161.34	175.62	135	#25	-1	-3.6	-2.7	-8.6
14/15/15	160.02	179.29	134	#26	+1	-11.1	-3.5	-9.6
14/14/13	160.50	178.98	133	#27	-3	-5.3	-4.6	-5.8
15/9/15	161.34	174.78	135	#28	-1	-3.9	-2.9	-9.1
12/15/15	158.82	179.82	135	#29	-2	-18.1	-3.7	-7.4
15/14/12	161.34	178.98	132	#30	+1	-3.5	-4.8	-6.1
13/15/14	159.66	179.82	134	#31	-3	-12.3	-5.8	-8.9
13/13/15	159.66	178.14	135	#32	-6	-13.5	-3.3	-10.2
14/15/12	160.50	179.82	132	#33	-1	-6.7	-6.9	-6.2
13/12/15	159.66	177.30	135	#34	-7	-14.1	-3.8	-10.8
14/11/15	160.50	176.46	135	#35	-8	-6.0	-4.6	-9.6
14/13/13	160.50	178.14	133	#36	-6	-8.0	-5.5	-6.4
11/15/15	157.98	179.82	135	#37	+0	-18.7	-4.6	-7.6
12/14/15	158.82	178.98	135	#38	-5	-19.8	-4.1	-8.3
15/15/10	161.34	179.82	131	#39	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
15/15/11	161.34	179.82	131	#40	+2	-7.8	-7.8	-7.6
15/8/15	161.34	173.94	135	#41	-4	-6.2	-4.0	-9.7
15/13/12	161.34	178.14	132	#42	-1	-6.3	-7.8	-6.9
12/15/14	158.82	179.82	134	#43	-4	-19.5	-6.2	-9.1
13/14/14	159.66	178.98	134	#44	-6	-13.9	-6.2	-10.2
14/12/13	160.50	177.30	133	#45	-7	-8.5	-7.4	-7.1
12/13/15	158.82	178.14	135	#46	-8	-20.8	-3.7	-10.4
14/10/15	160.50	175.62	135	#47	-8	-8.2	-5.1	-10.0
15/12/12	161.34	177.30	132	#48	-2	-6.8	-8.4	-7.5
11/14/15	157.98	178.98	135	#49	+0	-20.5	-5.0	-8.5
14/9/15	160.50	174.78	135	#50	-8	-8.5	-5.3	-10.6
… 3550 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Per-matchup IV finder (132 specific matchups - e.g. "which IV beats a given opponent in a given shield?")

Collapsed by default. This is a per-(opponent, shield) lookup: each card is one matchup and the exact IV spreads that win it. For "what do I need vs threat X" use Threats where your build choice matters above, or paste your collection into the scatter. Composite cards (slayer ∩ tier) surface IVs that satisfy a slayer anchor and a stat-cutoff tier; pure slayer-archetype cards live in the Slayer Builds block below, pure tier cards in the Threshold Tiers above.

Show only notable categories (≤ 5% of cohort or ≤ 5 members). Uncheck to see every non-trivial intersection.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Fortified Seismitoad (4 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Fortified Seismitoad · def≥179.29, hp≥130

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +1.2, spread 0.2)

15/15/10 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 131, SP #53

One of 4 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Seismitoad threshold (def≥179.29, hp≥130). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (338/338) AND clears the Fortified Seismitoad cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/15/11 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 131, SP #52

15/15/12 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 132, SP #26

15/15/13 👑 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 133, SP #7

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Fortified Seismitoad (5 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Fortified Seismitoad · def≥179.29, hp≥130

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +1.6, spread 0.7)

15/15/9 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 130, SP #92

One of 5 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Seismitoad threshold (def≥179.29, hp≥130). Carries top Anchors-First Slayer mirror wins (338/338) AND clears the Fortified Seismitoad cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/15/10 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 131, SP #53

15/15/11 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 131, SP #52

15/15/12 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 132, SP #26

15/15/13 👑 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 133, SP #7

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Walrein (Shadow) Bulk (10 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Walrein (Shadow) Bulk · def≥178.083

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +1.4, spread 0.3)

15/13/12 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 178.14, hp 132, SP #61

One of 10 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Walrein (Shadow) Bulk threshold (def≥178.083). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (338/338) AND clears the Walrein (Shadow) Bulk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/13/13 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 178.14, hp 133, SP #32

15/13/14 👑 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 178.14, hp 134, SP #10

15/14/10 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 178.98, hp 131, SP #75

15/14/12 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 178.98, hp 132, SP #41

15/14/13 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 178.98, hp 133, SP #19

15/15/10 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 131, SP #53

15/15/11 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 131, SP #52

15/15/12 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 132, SP #26

15/15/13 👑 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 179.82, hp 133, SP #7

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Ampharos (Shadow) Slayer (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Ampharos (Shadow) Slayer · atk≥160.359, hp≥123

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +2.0, spread 1.2)

15/8/15 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 173.94, hp 135, SP #67

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos (Shadow) Slayer threshold (atk≥160.359, hp≥123). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (338/338) AND clears the Ampharos (Shadow) Slayer cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/9/15 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 174.78, hp 135, SP #45

15/10/15 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 175.62, hp 135, SP #30

15/11/15 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 176.46, hp 135, SP #16

15/12/10 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 177.30, hp 131, SP #139

15/12/11 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 177.30, hp 131, SP #138

15/12/12 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 177.30, hp 132, SP #86

15/12/13 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 177.30, hp 133, SP #48

15/12/14 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 177.30, hp 134, SP #24

15/12/15 👑 slight atk weight - atk 161.34, def 177.30, hp 135, SP #5