Ninetales Ultra League IV Dive

Opponent list (63 mons)

Tinkaton, Corviknight, Snorlax (Shadow), Corviknight (Shadow), Melmetal, Virizion, Zygarde (Complete Forme), Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow), Mimikyu, Snorlax, Florges, Moltres (Galarian), Feraligatr (Shadow), Feraligatr, Jellicent, Giratina (Altered), Cramorant, Guzzlord, Skeledirge, Rillaboom, Lapras, Lapras (Shadow), Dusknoir, Ninetales (Alolan), Dondozo, Dusknoir (Shadow), Registeel, Blastoise, Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), Forretress, Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), Regidrago, Ninetales, Cresselia, Muk (Alolan), Clefable, Talonflame, Forretress (Shadow), Walrein, Walrein (Shadow), Deoxys (Defense), Runerigus, Steelix, Seaking, Cresselia (Shadow), Steelix (Shadow), Swampert, Toucannon, Milotic (Shadow), Primarina, Ampharos, Cradily (Shadow), Malamar (Shadow), Ampharos (Shadow), Talonflame (Shadow), Bellibolt, Seismitoad, Annihilape, Miltank, Forretress (Bug Bite), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)

Which one to build? [all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (356 spreads, roughly Atk >= 150.70 and Def >= 161.60 and HP >= 157) guarantees 44 of the 68 decision matchups; Build 3 (70 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 32 others; Build 1 wide (855 spreads) keeps 38 of Build 1's 44 guaranteed matchups and holds the standout.

Build criteria: the same control as the one in the scatter strip below; either handle moves both

Ninetales running Ember / Overheat, Weather Ball (Fire).

[all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (356 spreads, roughly Atk >= 150.70 and Def >= 161.60 and HP >= 157) guarantees 44 of the 68 decision matchups; Build 3 (70 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 32 others; Build 1 wide (855 spreads) keeps 38 of Build 1's 44 guaranteed matchups and holds the standout.

No single-stat line on this moveset.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	~ Atk >= 150.70 and Def >= 161.60 and HP >= 157	356	44 of 68, 2 of them material; 33 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (outside 19%)	13: 0v0 Walrein (Shadow), 0v1 Rillaboom, +11 more	11/15/14 (307 of 567 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (44 of 68), its 356 members The rule covers 97% of the same spreads (10 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the build. 0v0 (8) 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 26%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 32%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 (4) 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 60% 0v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 78% 0v2 (2) 0v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 27%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (5) 1v0 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 47% 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 51% 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 76% 1v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 79% 1v1 (8) 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 19%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 32% 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 37% 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 38% 1v2 (5) 1v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 43% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 50% 1v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 59% 2v0 (1) 2v0 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 45% 2v1 (4) 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 59% 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 59% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 70% 2v2 (7) 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 31%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 46% 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 66% 2v2 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 66% Members (356), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 148.00 and Def + 2.375*HP >= 535.19	855	38 of 68, 0 of them material; 28 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	19: 0v0 Walrein (Shadow), 0v0 Toucannon, +17 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 97% of the same spreads (18 extra, 8 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 356 spreads in 855 of its own, and keeps 38 of Build 1's 44 guaranteed matchups (none of them material). The 6 it gives up out here: 0v0 Toucannon (grid 33%), 0v2 Clefable (grid 34%) and 2v2 Snorlax (grid 37%), and 3 more. It holds the standout below.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 170.50 and HP >= 160 (bulk box)	70	32 of 68, 3 of them material; 28 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v0 Snorlax (outside 1%)	25: 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow), 0v0 Moltres (Galarian), +23 more	11/15/14 (307 of 567 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (32 of 68), its 70 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (4) 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 1%; material 0v0 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 61% 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 88% 0v1 (5) 0v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 57% 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 63% 0v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 64% 0v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 79% 0v2 (2) 0v2 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 31% 0v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 38% 1v0 (4) 1v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 1%; material 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 55% 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 77% 1v1 (4) 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 29% 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 52% 1v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 84% 1v2 (7) 1v2 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 6%; material 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 30% 1v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 33% 1v2 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 33% 2v1 (2) 2v1 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 40% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 72% 2v2 (4) 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 50% 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 75% 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 87% Members (70), highest stat product first

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	~ Atk >= 150.70 and Def >= 161.60 and HP >= 157	356	23 of 29 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 44 of 68 overall, 2 of them material; 33 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (outside 19%)	11: 0v0 Walrein (Shadow), 0v1 Rillaboom, +9 more	11/15/13 (112 of 189 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (23 of 29 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 44 of 68 overall), its 356 members The rule covers 97% of the same spreads (10 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the build. 0v0 (8) 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 26%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 32%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 (4) 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 60% 0v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 78% 0v2 (2) 0v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 27%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (5) 1v0 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 47% 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 51% 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 76% 1v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 79% 1v1 (8) 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 19%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 32% 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 37% 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 38% 1v2 (5) 1v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 43% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 50% 1v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 59% 2v0 (1) 2v0 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 45% 2v1 (4) 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 59% 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 59% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 70% 2v2 (7) 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 31%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 46% 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 66% 2v2 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 66% Members (356), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 148.00 and Def + 2.375*HP >= 535.19	855	19 of 29 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 38 of 68 overall, 0 of them material; 28 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	17: 0v0 Walrein (Shadow), 0v0 Toucannon, +15 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 97% of the same spreads (18 extra, 8 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 356 spreads in 855 of its own, and keeps 19 of Build 1's 23 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (38 of its 44 overall, none of them material). The 6 it gives up out here: 0v0 Toucannon (grid 33%), 0v2 Clefable (grid 34%) and 2v2 Snorlax (grid 37%), and 3 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 171.40 and HP >= 159 (bulk box)	67	12 of 29 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 30 of 68 overall, 2 of them material; 26 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (outside 1%)	25: 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow), 0v0 Moltres (Galarian), +23 more	10/15/13 (112 of 189 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (12 of 29 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 30 of 68 overall), its 67 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (4) 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 1%; material 0v0 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 61% 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 88% 0v1 (5) 0v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 57% 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 63% 0v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 64% 0v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 79% 0v2 (2) 0v2 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 31% 0v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 38% 1v0 (3) 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 55% 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 77% 1v1 (4) 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 29% 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 52% 1v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 84% 1v2 (6) 1v2 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 6%; material 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 30% 1v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 33% 1v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 47%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (2) 2v1 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 40% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 72% 2v2 (4) 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 50% 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 75% 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 87% Members (67), highest stat product first

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

Atk >= 150.70 + Def/HP staircase (8 steps)

433

9 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 46 of 68 overall, 2 of them material; 35 hold under every opponent-IV mode

1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (outside 17%)

1: 2v1 Lapras

11/15/7 (38 of 63 matchups)

What Build 1 guarantees (9 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 46 of 68 overall), its steps and its 433 members

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
154	169.5
155	166
156	166
157	166
158	164
159	163
160	161
161	159

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (8)
- 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 25%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 40%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 51%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 58%
- 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 87%
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 93%
- 0v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 97%
0v1 (5)
- 0v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 53%
- 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 59%
- 0v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 77%
- 0v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 93%
- 0v1 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 93%
0v2 (2)
- 0v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 26%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 49%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
1v0 (5)
- 1v0 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 46%
- 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 50%
- 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 75%
- 1v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 79%
- 1v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 92%
1v1 (9)
- 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 17%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 22%
- 1v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 30%
- 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 35%
- 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 37%
- 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 43%
- 1v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 65%
- 1v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 82%
1v2 (5)
- 1v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 41%
- 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 49%
- 1v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 51%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 58%
- 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 84%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v0 (1)
- 2v0 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 44%
2v1 (4)
- 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 58%
- 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 58%
- 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 69%
- 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 93%
2v2 (7)
- 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 45%
- 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 65%
- 2v2 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 65%
- 2v2 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 72%
- 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 86%
- 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 93%

Members (433), highest stat product first

Build 1 wide

Atk >= 147.00 + Def/HP staircase (8 steps)

874

6 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 35 of 68 overall, 0 of them material; 25 hold under every opponent-IV mode

12: 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow), 0v0 Walrein, +10 more

What the wider rule keeps and gives up

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
154	169.5
155	166
156	166
157	166
158	164
159	163
160	161
161	159

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 433 spreads in 874 of its own, and keeps 6 of Build 1's 9 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (35 of its 46 overall, none of them material).

The 11 it gives up out here: 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (grid 26%), 1v1 Ninetales (grid 30%) and 0v0 Toucannon (grid 33%), and 8 more.

Build 3 (bulk)

Atk >= 148.00 + Def/HP staircase (6 steps)

592

7 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 41 of 68 overall, 0 of them material; 32 hold under every opponent-IV mode

1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (outside 14%)

6: 0v0 Toucannon, 0v2 Clefable, +4 more

9/15/9 (38 of 63 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 3 guarantees (7 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 41 of 68 overall), its steps and its 592 members

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
156	166
157	166
158	164
159	163
160	161
161	159

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (7)
- 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 27%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 49%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 56%
- 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 87%
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 93%
- 0v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 97%
0v1 (5)
- 0v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 51%
- 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 58%
- 0v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 76%
- 0v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 93%
- 0v1 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 93%
0v2 (1)
- 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 47%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
1v0 (5)
- 1v0 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 43%
- 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 48%
- 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 74%
- 1v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 78%
- 1v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 92%
1v1 (7)
- 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 14%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 27%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 32%
- 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 41%
- 1v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 45%
- 1v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 63%
- 1v1 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 81%
1v2 (4)
- 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 47%
- 1v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 49%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 56%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 83%
2v0 (1)
- 2v0 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 42%
2v1 (5)
- 2v1 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 31%
- 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 56%
- 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 56%
- 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 68%
- 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 93%
2v2 (6)
- 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 42%
- 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 63%
- 2v2 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 63%
- 2v2 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 71%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 85%
- 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 92%

Members (592), highest stat product first

Rates: outside N% is the share of the spreads NOT in that build that win the same matchup anyway; grid N% (the Notable spreads list and the cards at the top of the page) is the share of all the spreads on the grid. Weight follows the rate: bold = fewer than half of them win it; bold and underlined = fewer than a quarter; bold, underlined and italic = fewer than a tenth; dim = more than nine in ten win it anyway.

Each build's guarantee list is sorted by outside rate: how often the spreads NOT in that build win the same matchup anyway. The lower the rate, the rarer the guarantee.

Against the 31 spreads the mirror-slayer protocol converges on for Ninetales (bulk-first here), attack of 151.64 and up wins charge-move priority against 18 of them, and 151.85 and up against 24. Inside a build, take the highest attack you have: Build 1 clears the first cut with 265 of 356 and the second with 254; Build 3 clears neither with any of its 70.

Is mine in one of these?

Paste your Poke Genie CSV, or add one spread by hand, in Check my collection below; the answer comes back here, grouped by build, and your collection stays in your browser.

Shield scenario:

Y: Color:

Stat-product rank against matchups won with PvPoke-default opponent IVs at the league cap over the whole opponent pool and, with Shield scenario on all, every baked shield state -- the view the single-stat line in the expander below was derived on. The Shield scenario selector on this row is the section's own; the scatter's dropdowns and the opponent filter do not drive this panel.

SP1 9/15/15, 10/15/13

Notable spreads

Every single spread this page names, on one list: the spread that wins the most matchups, the one with the highest avg battle score, SP1, and each build's most-winning member. Entries whose decision-matchup wins overlap by 90% or more are merged, because two spreads that win the same matchups are one offer.

10/15/13 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios)

in: It is in none of the builds, though Build 1 wide holds it. Of the 64 decision matchups it wins, Build 1 guarantees 44 to every one of its 356 members.
vs Build 1: wins 20 it does not guarantee -- 1v2 Dusknoir (Shadow) (grid 2%; 1% of members), 1v0 Snorlax (grid 3%; 1% of members) and 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (grid 3%; 4% of members),
loses: none of the 44 matchups Build 1 guarantees

What else is true of 10/15/13

No other spread on this grid wins all 64 of the decision matchups it wins.

9/15/15 (Highest avg battle score and SP1) and 11/15/14 (Build 1's most-winning member and Build 3's most-winning member) differ from it by 2 to 4 decision matchups, so this entry is the offer and they are spellings of it.

What to do with this: If you already have one of these spreads, build it: each is the top of this grid on the measure that named it. If you are hunting, hunt a build instead.

Wild catches needed to meet one named spread out of the 4096 on this grid: 2839 for a 50% chance, 5678 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

The single-stat line

None of the 5 movesets on this page carries a line. This page is Ember / Overheat, Weather Ball (Fire), and it carries no line; Ember / Solar Beam, Weather Ball (Fire), Ember / Energy Ball, Weather Ball (Fire), Fire Spin / Overheat, Weather Ball (Fire) and Ember / Psyshock, Weather Ball (Fire) carry no line.

Line: none
Closest: Atk >= 148.73 -- 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow), rank 9, 132 spreads of 4096 on the wrong side
SP1: 9/15/15 -- wins 305 of 567
Alternative: none (the widest pair that buys anything is already 75.0% of the grid)
Decision width: 4 matchups

No attack, defense or HP threshold decides a matchup for Ninetales running Ember / Overheat, Weather Ball (Fire) in Ultra League; build for stat product. The closest thing to a line is 148.73 attack in the 0v0 against Empoleon (Shadow), rank 9. Nothing below it wins, and 1916 of the 2048 spreads at or above it do. It is not a build line because 93.6% of the spreads at or above it win, under the 97% a rule with one clean side needs, and 132 of 4096 spreads sit on the wrong side of it, over the 20 a near-exact rule allows.

Bulk does not separate either: the only defense-and-HP pair that buys anything, 163.01 defense, is already 75.0% of the grid. SP1, 9/15/15 at L50.0, wins 305 of its 567 matchups, and is inside that pair. The spread winning the most matchups on this grid is 10/15/13 with 309 of 567, so the whole IV decision here is 4 matchups wide.

rank-1

Shield scenario:

Why these regions

Why these regions and not others. The set panel below is every candidate region the builds were cut from. Under it, the same grid grouped by which contested matchups a spread wins -- its win/loss fingerprint, not its score -- drawn on the stat planes where a region is a shape; crossing a breakpoint or bulkpoint moves a spread to the next cluster.

The set panel (an UpSet plot: a bar chart of set intersections, Lex et al. 2014). Left: the named sets the lattice was built from (rows, labelled 'spreads in the set / decision matchups every member of it wins') and the candidate regions made by intersecting them (columns -- bar height is spreads, the number above it is decision matchups guaranteed in the shield scenarios this setting counts, and a coloured column is one of the builds in the table above). A dot means the region sits inside that row's set. The letters index THIS setting's own eight sets and are re-assigned when the Build criteria change, so compare the row names across Build criteria settings, not the letters.

clusters

Shield scenario:

Lattice view: 95% of this dive's IV spreads sit at the same level (L50) -- this species does not reach the league CP cap, so it is pinned at the max power-up level. At a fixed level each battle stat tracks a single IV, so attack / defense / HP each take only ~16 values and the panels look like a sparse grid: each visible point stacks the spreads that share a stat pair (up to 16, one per remaining IV). This is expected, not missing data -- the clustering still runs on the full set of win/loss fingerprints.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	528	148.3	162.3	149	#1739-#4096	3.6	-
C1	1784	144.9	166.5	155	#32-#4034	6.8	Annihilape (+100pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (+100pp), Deoxys (Defense) (+71pp), Ninetales (+63pp); trades away Bellibolt (-50pp), Shadow Empoleon (-25pp), Shadow Malamar (-19pp)
C2	1784	151.6	166.4	155	#1-#3452	11.5	Bellibolt (+100pp), Shadow Empoleon (+100pp), Walrein (+87pp), Toucannon (+74pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2
Bellibolt	50%	0%	100%
Shadow Empoleon	25%	0%	100%
Galarian Moltres	0%	54%	76%
Deoxys (Defense)	0%	71%	71%
Walrein	0%	0%	87%
Toucannon	4%	0%	74%
Shadow Malamar	19%	0%	36%
Shadow Ampharos	56%	72%	100%
Annihilape	0%	100%	100%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	0%	100%	100%
Ninetales	32%	96%	98%
Dusknoir	94%	88%	100%
Shadow Walrein	0%	4%	3%
Florges	82%	100%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Bellibolt	50%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	100%	named
Shadow Empoleon	47%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	97%	named
Galarian Moltres	57%	wins iff hp >= 153	76%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	62%	wins iff hp >= 153	81%	named
Walrein	38%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	88%	named
Toucannon	33%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	89%	named
Shadow Malamar	18%	wins iff atk >= 152.32	100%	named
Shadow Ampharos	82%	wins iff sp >= 3,626,184	91%	named
Annihilape	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,549,151	90%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,549,151	90%	named
Ninetales	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,567,423	92%	named
Dusknoir	94%	wins iff atk >= 142.85	100%	named
Shadow Walrein	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,096,624	97%	named
Florges	98%	wins iff sp >= 3,413,872	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1150	148.4	163.1	151	#926-#4096	2.5	-
C1	737	148.3	162.5	157	#398-#3888	5.6	Galarian Moltres (+100pp), Shadow Cresselia (+90pp), Cresselia (+70pp), Shadow Ampharos (+32pp)
C2	2209	148.2	168.5	156	#1-#3786	7.1	Rillaboom (+99pp), Shadow Ampharos (+61pp), Alolan Muk (+58pp); trades away Galarian Moltres (-68pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2
Rillaboom	15%	0%	99%
Shadow Ampharos	3%	35%	96%
Shadow Cresselia	2%	91%	87%
Alolan Muk	28%	35%	93%
Galarian Moltres	0%	100%	32%
Cresselia	30%	100%	99%
Ampharos	6%	8%	8%
Tinkaton	94%	94%	94%
Clefable	78%	100%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Rillaboom	58%	wins iff def >= 165.73	92%	named
Shadow Ampharos	59%	wins iff def >= 164.89	82%	named
Shadow Cresselia	64%	wins iff hp >= 154	85%	named
Alolan Muk	64%	wins iff def >= 163.86	96%	named
Galarian Moltres	35%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Cresselia	80%	wins iff hp >= 151	89%	named
Ampharos	7%	wins iff atk >= 153.70	97%	named
Tinkaton	94%	wins iff atk >= 142.85	100%	named
Clefable	94%	wins iff sp >= 3,482,608	95%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1126	146.9	163.4	151	#1452-#4096	2.3	-
C1	2970	148.8	166.9	156	#1-#3628	5.9	Shadow Lapras (+76pp), Talonflame (+71pp), Shadow Cradily (+62pp), Walrein (+58pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Talonflame	0%	71%
Shadow Cradily	0%	62%
Shadow Lapras	0%	76%
Walrein	36%	94%
Seaking	70%	85%
Miltank	47%	100%
Shadow Empoleon	74%	100%
Snorlax	0%	4%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Talonflame	51%	wins iff atk >= 147.05	89%	named
Shadow Cradily	45%	wins iff def >= 164.21	83%	named
Shadow Lapras	55%	wins iff sp >= 3,782,905	84%	named
Walrein	78%	wins iff sp >= 3,665,136	91%	named
Seaking	81%	wins iff atk >= 144.53	100%	named
Miltank	86%	wins iff sp >= 3,551,586	89%	named
Shadow Empoleon	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,549,151	97%	named
Snorlax	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,119,349	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2095	147.7	164.5	152	#631-#4096	3.2	-
C1	2001	148.9	167.4	157	#1-#3179	8.9	Walrein (+91pp), Florges (+86pp), Shadow Lapras (+74pp), Deoxys (Defense) (+73pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Walrein	5%	96%
Deoxys (Defense)	17%	91%
Galarian Moltres	38%	50%
Florges	0%	86%
Shadow Lapras	2%	75%
Skeledirge	59%	78%
Ninetales	0%	62%
Ampharos	53%	94%
Shadow Dusknoir	0%	53%
Shadow Empoleon	68%	100%
Shadow Malamar	81%	100%
Runerigus	0%	6%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Walrein	49%	wins iff sp >= 3,786,519	85%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	53%	wins iff hp >= 155	78%	named
Galarian Moltres	44%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	100%	named
Florges	42%	wins iff sp >= 3,818,316	86%	named
Shadow Lapras	38%	wins iff sp >= 3,871,057	85%	named
Skeledirge	69%	wins iff atk >= 146.21	100%	named
Ninetales	30%	wins iff sp >= 3,907,036	87%	named
Ampharos	73%	wins iff def >= 162.53	86%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	26%	wins iff sp >= 3,921,887	88%	named
Shadow Empoleon	84%	wins iff sp >= 3,590,406	91%	named
Shadow Malamar	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,542,022	93%	named
Runerigus	3%	wins iff def >= 171.75	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1635	144.3	166.0	155	#92-#4096	3.4	-
C1	2461	150.9	165.9	154	#1-#4026	6.8	Steelix (+94pp), Empoleon (+93pp), Shadow Malamar (+56pp), Clefable (+36pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Clefable	26%	62%
Melmetal	57%	53%
Empoleon	0%	93%
Ampharos	40%	69%
Shadow Malamar	25%	82%
Steelix	6%	100%
Shadow Forretress	36%	34%
Rillaboom	35%	33%
Shadow Corviknight	34%	30%
Cresselia	65%	100%
Shadow Empoleon	10%	7%
Dusknoir	0%	7%
Ninetales	0%	4%
Shadow Dusknoir	3%	2%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Clefable	48%	wins iff atk >= 150.74	84%	named
Melmetal	55%	wins iff hp >= 154	84%	named
Empoleon	56%	wins iff atk >= 147.89	100%	named
Ampharos	57%	wins iff sp >= 3,755,889	81%	named
Shadow Malamar	59%	wins iff sp >= 3,743,029	84%	named
Steelix	62%	wins iff atk >= 147.05	100%	named
Shadow Forretress	35%	wins iff def < 160.50	72%	named
Rillaboom	34%	wins iff def >= 166.22	84%	named
Shadow Corviknight	31%	wins iff hp >= 158	85%	named
Cresselia	86%	wins iff atk >= 143.69	92%	named
Shadow Empoleon	8%	wins iff sp >= 4,073,617	94%	named
Dusknoir	4%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Ninetales	2%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Dusknoir	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,148,153	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1528	144.1	165.9	154	#299-#4096	1.8	-
C1	2568	150.7	165.9	154	#1-#4026	5.2	Runerigus (+100pp), Talonflame (+100pp), Skeledirge (+74pp), Shadow Talonflame (+40pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Talonflame	20%	60%
Lapras	41%	41%
Talonflame	0%	100%
Runerigus	0%	100%
Skeledirge	26%	100%
Miltank	9%	19%
Walrein	83%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Talonflame	45%	wins iff atk >= 150.74	86%	named
Lapras	41%	wins iff hp >= 156	88%	named
Talonflame	62%	wins iff atk >= 147.05	100%	named
Runerigus	63%	wins iff atk >= 147.05	100%	named
Skeledirge	72%	wins iff atk >= 146.21	96%	named
Miltank	15%	wins iff sp >= 3,991,143	92%	named
Walrein	94%	wins iff atk >= 142.85	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1280	143.7	166.0	154	#319-#4096	3.6	-
C1	2816	150.3	165.9	154	#1-#4051	8.8	Walrein (+100pp), Shadow Walrein (+100pp), Dusknoir (+80pp), Snorlax (+54pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Mimikyu	51%	51%
Annihilape	19%	46%
Snorlax	0%	54%
Shadow Malamar	30%	84%
Ninetales	0%	47%
Walrein	0%	100%
Shadow Walrein	0%	100%
Shadow Snorlax	75%	75%
Dusknoir	20%	100%
Shadow Talonflame	16%	18%
Empoleon	60%	100%
Skeledirge	0%	10%
Alolan Muk	93%	93%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Mimikyu	51%	wins iff hp >= 155	93%	named
Annihilape	38%	wins iff sp >= 3,844,234	85%	named
Snorlax	37%	wins iff atk >= 150.35	100%	named
Shadow Malamar	67%	wins iff sp >= 3,719,761	85%	named
Ninetales	32%	wins iff atk >= 151.49	93%	named
Walrein	69%	wins iff atk >= 146.21	100%	named
Shadow Walrein	69%	wins iff atk >= 146.21	100%	named
Shadow Snorlax	75%	wins iff def >= 163.02	100%	named
Dusknoir	75%	wins iff atk >= 145.37	100%	named
Shadow Talonflame	18%	wins iff def >= 170.72	89%	named
Empoleon	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,602,129	91%	named
Skeledirge	7%	wins iff sp >= 4,067,811	95%	named
Alolan Muk	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,477,708	95%	named

all scenarios: 77 win/loss bits (one per contested opponent per scenario) concatenated across 7 of 9 shield scenarios (0v2, 2v0 excluded as degenerate); 2464 distinct win patterns; K=2 clusters (silhouette 0.37); split at atk 145.79.

Sharpest single scenarios on this page: 2v1 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.66 over 7 contested opponents, split atk 146.63) and 0v0 shields (K=3, silhouette 0.62 over 14 contested opponents, split atk 148.31) -- pick them in the dropdown above.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1375	143.9	165.7	154	#319-#4096	26.2	-
C1	2721	150.5	166.0	155	#1-#3949	49.1	Skeledirge [1v1] (+93pp), Walrein [2v2] (+93pp), Shadow Walrein [2v2] (+93pp), Steelix [1v2] (+87pp)

Per-cluster win rates vs each contested opponent

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Bellibolt [0v0]	0%	75%
Mimikyu [2v2]	47%	53%
Walrein [1v1]	26%	61%
Talonflame [1v0]	0%	77%
Clefable [1v2]	22%	60%
Deoxys (Defense) [1v1]	49%	55%
Shadow Empoleon [0v0]	0%	70%
Melmetal [1v2]	51%	57%
Shadow Cradily [1v0]	42%	47%
Shadow Talonflame [2v1]	19%	59%
Shadow Lapras [1v0]	45%	61%
Galarian Moltres [1v1]	0%	66%
Empoleon [1v2]	2%	83%
Galarian Moltres [0v0]	32%	69%
Ampharos [1v2]	29%	72%
Rillaboom [0v1]	54%	60%
Florges [1v1]	21%	53%
Shadow Ampharos [0v1]	55%	61%
Lapras [2v1]	38%	42%
Shadow Malamar [1v2]	12%	83%
Deoxys (Defense) [0v0]	58%	64%
Annihilape [2v2]	18%	48%
Walrein [0v0]	0%	57%
Shadow Lapras [1v1]	14%	50%
Steelix [1v2]	5%	92%
Talonflame [2v1]	5%	92%
Snorlax [2v2]	0%	56%
Runerigus [2v1]	5%	92%
Shadow Cresselia [0v1]	59%	66%
Alolan Muk [0v1]	60%	67%
Galarian Moltres [0v1]	32%	36%
Shadow Forretress [1v2]	36%	34%
Rillaboom [1v2]	32%	35%
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	28%	87%
Toucannon [0v0]	0%	49%
Ninetales [2v2]	0%	48%
Shadow Corviknight [1v2]	30%	32%
Skeledirge [1v1]	7%	100%
Walrein [2v2]	7%	100%
Shadow Walrein [2v2]	7%	100%
Ninetales [1v1]	21%	35%
Skeledirge [2v1]	18%	100%
Ampharos [1v1]	64%	77%
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	3%	38%
Shadow Snorlax [2v2]	72%	76%
Dusknoir [2v2]	26%	100%
Walrein [1v0]	50%	92%
Cresselia [0v1]	74%	83%
Seaking [1v0]	44%	100%
Shadow Malamar [0v0]	0%	27%
Shadow Ampharos [0v0]	57%	95%
Shadow Talonflame [2v2]	15%	19%
Shadow Empoleon [1v1]	74%	89%
Miltank [2v1]	9%	19%
Miltank [1v0]	80%	88%
Cresselia [1v2]	58%	100%
Annihilape [0v0]	81%	90%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [0v0]	81%	90%
Empoleon [2v2]	62%	100%
Ninetales [0v0]	80%	93%
Shadow Malamar [1v1]	80%	96%
Shadow Empoleon [1v2]	9%	8%
Ampharos [0v1]	0%	11%
Shadow Empoleon [1v0]	80%	100%
Skeledirge [2v2]	0%	10%
Alolan Muk [2v2]	90%	95%
Dusknoir [0v0]	81%	100%
Tinkaton [0v1]	81%	100%
Clefable [0v1]	91%	95%
Walrein [2v1]	81%	100%
Dusknoir [1v2]	0%	7%
Runerigus [1v1]	0%	5%
Shadow Walrein [0v0]	4%	3%
Snorlax [1v0]	3%	2%
Florges [0v0]	97%	98%
Ninetales [1v2]	0%	3%
Shadow Dusknoir [1v2]	3%	2%

Green tint = the cluster mostly wins that matchup, red tint = mostly loses; the percentage is the share of the cluster's IVs that win.

Stat rules that reproduce the clusters (in-sample accuracy 97.6%)

atk < 145.79:
  atk < 144.95:
    -> cluster C0 (n=1024)
  atk >= 144.95:
    hp < 153.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=112)
    hp >= 153.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=144)
atk >= 145.79:
  atk < 148.31:
    hp < 151.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=192)
    hp >= 151.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=576)
  atk >= 148.31:
    -> cluster C1 (n=2048)

Depth-3 decision tree over (atk, def, hp). Accuracy is in-sample (regularized by a minimum leaf size), not cross-validated -- read it as "how well the clusters reduce to stat regions", not a prediction claim.

Matchup flip thresholds (candidate anchors)

The single stat and threshold that most accurately predicts win/loss across all IVs -- misclassifications allowed, so it is a diagnostic and a candidate anchor, not a build target. The "flips at" cutoffs under "Threats where your build choice matters" answer the other question (the lowest cutoff whose 75/25 split is clean) and are usually higher for the same opponent.

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Bellibolt [0v0]	50%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	100%	named
Mimikyu [2v2]	51%	wins iff hp >= 155	93%	named
Walrein [1v1]	49%	wins iff sp >= 3,786,519	85%	named
Talonflame [1v0]	51%	wins iff atk >= 147.05	89%	named
Clefable [1v2]	48%	wins iff atk >= 150.74	84%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [1v1]	53%	wins iff hp >= 155	78%	named
Shadow Empoleon [0v0]	47%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	97%	named
Melmetal [1v2]	55%	wins iff hp >= 154	84%	named
Shadow Cradily [1v0]	45%	wins iff def >= 164.21	83%	named
Shadow Talonflame [2v1]	45%	wins iff atk >= 150.74	86%	named
Shadow Lapras [1v0]	55%	wins iff sp >= 3,782,905	84%	named
Galarian Moltres [1v1]	44%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	100%	named
Empoleon [1v2]	56%	wins iff atk >= 147.89	100%	named
Galarian Moltres [0v0]	57%	wins iff hp >= 153	76%	named
Ampharos [1v2]	57%	wins iff sp >= 3,755,889	81%	named
Rillaboom [0v1]	58%	wins iff def >= 165.73	92%	named
Florges [1v1]	42%	wins iff sp >= 3,818,316	86%	named
Shadow Ampharos [0v1]	59%	wins iff def >= 164.89	82%	named
Lapras [2v1]	41%	wins iff hp >= 156	88%	named
Shadow Malamar [1v2]	59%	wins iff sp >= 3,743,029	84%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [0v0]	62%	wins iff hp >= 153	81%	named
Annihilape [2v2]	38%	wins iff sp >= 3,844,234	85%	named
Walrein [0v0]	38%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	88%	named
Shadow Lapras [1v1]	38%	wins iff sp >= 3,871,057	85%	named
Steelix [1v2]	62%	wins iff atk >= 147.05	100%	named
Talonflame [2v1]	62%	wins iff atk >= 147.05	100%	named
Snorlax [2v2]	37%	wins iff atk >= 150.35	100%	named
Runerigus [2v1]	63%	wins iff atk >= 147.05	100%	named
Shadow Cresselia [0v1]	64%	wins iff hp >= 154	85%	named
Alolan Muk [0v1]	64%	wins iff def >= 163.86	96%	named
Galarian Moltres [0v1]	35%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Forretress [1v2]	35%	wins iff def < 160.50	72%	named
Rillaboom [1v2]	34%	wins iff def >= 166.22	84%	named
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	67%	wins iff sp >= 3,719,761	85%	named
Toucannon [0v0]	33%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	89%	named
Ninetales [2v2]	32%	wins iff atk >= 151.49	93%	named
Shadow Corviknight [1v2]	31%	wins iff hp >= 158	85%	named
Skeledirge [1v1]	69%	wins iff atk >= 146.21	100%	named
Walrein [2v2]	69%	wins iff atk >= 146.21	100%	named
Shadow Walrein [2v2]	69%	wins iff atk >= 146.21	100%	named
Ninetales [1v1]	30%	wins iff sp >= 3,907,036	87%	named
Skeledirge [2v1]	72%	wins iff atk >= 146.21	96%	named
Ampharos [1v1]	73%	wins iff def >= 162.53	86%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	26%	wins iff sp >= 3,921,887	88%	named
Shadow Snorlax [2v2]	75%	wins iff def >= 163.02	100%	named
Dusknoir [2v2]	75%	wins iff atk >= 145.37	100%	named
Walrein [1v0]	78%	wins iff sp >= 3,665,136	91%	named
Cresselia [0v1]	80%	wins iff hp >= 151	89%	named
Seaking [1v0]	81%	wins iff atk >= 144.53	100%	named
Shadow Malamar [0v0]	18%	wins iff atk >= 152.32	100%	named
Shadow Ampharos [0v0]	82%	wins iff sp >= 3,626,184	91%	named
Shadow Talonflame [2v2]	18%	wins iff def >= 170.72	89%	named
Shadow Empoleon [1v1]	84%	wins iff sp >= 3,590,406	91%	named
Miltank [2v1]	15%	wins iff sp >= 3,991,143	92%	named
Miltank [1v0]	86%	wins iff sp >= 3,551,586	89%	named
Cresselia [1v2]	86%	wins iff atk >= 143.69	92%	named
Annihilape [0v0]	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,549,151	90%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [0v0]	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,549,151	90%	named
Empoleon [2v2]	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,602,129	91%	named
Ninetales [0v0]	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,567,423	92%	named
Shadow Malamar [1v1]	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,542,022	93%	named
Shadow Empoleon [1v2]	8%	wins iff sp >= 4,073,617	94%	named
Ampharos [0v1]	7%	wins iff atk >= 153.70	97%	named
Shadow Empoleon [1v0]	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,549,151	97%	named
Skeledirge [2v2]	7%	wins iff sp >= 4,067,811	95%	named
Alolan Muk [2v2]	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,477,708	95%	named
Dusknoir [0v0]	94%	wins iff atk >= 142.85	100%	named
Tinkaton [0v1]	94%	wins iff atk >= 142.85	100%	named
Clefable [0v1]	94%	wins iff sp >= 3,482,608	95%	named
Walrein [2v1]	94%	wins iff atk >= 142.85	100%	named
Dusknoir [1v2]	4%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Runerigus [1v1]	3%	wins iff def >= 171.75	98%	named
Shadow Walrein [0v0]	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,096,624	97%	named
Snorlax [1v0]	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,119,349	98%	named
Florges [0v0]	98%	wins iff sp >= 3,413,872	98%	named
Ninetales [1v2]	2%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Dusknoir [1v2]	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,148,153	98%	named

Rows are ordered by discriminating power (win rate closest to 50%). "Rule accuracy" is how well that single stat threshold predicts the win/loss across all IVs, and is only shown when it beats always-predicting the majority outcome; high-accuracy UNNAMED rows are candidate new anchors. "Named" means an authored anchor names that opponent (alt-moveset / IV-variant rows inherit their base opponent's anchor).

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2168	145.2	165.9	154	#32-#4096	15.8	-
C1	1928	151.8	165.9	155	#1-#3897	28.1	Bellibolt [0v0] (+94pp), Galarian Moltres [1v1] (+93pp), Shadow Empoleon [0v0] (+90pp), Snorlax [2v2] (+80pp)

Computed at bake time for moveset EMBER / OVERHEAT, WEATHER_BALL_FIRE with PvPoke default opponent IVs and bait-selective shield play, over the full opponent pool; this does not follow the scatter's moveset / opponent-IV / bait dropdowns or the opponent filter.

How this works

Per shield scenario: an opponent is contested when between 2% and 98% of this dive's IV spreads beat it (everyone else is settled and can't distinguish IVs). Each IV's fingerprint is its win/loss vector over those opponents; fingerprints are clustered bottom-up (agglomerative, Hamming distance, average linkage). The number of clusters, K, is chosen by silhouette -- a 0-to-1 score of how cleanly the fingerprints separate, where above about 0.5 the clusters are distinct groups and below 0.30 the headline says "weak separation" and the clusters are tendencies rather than tiers -- under a parsimony floor (a split must keep every cluster above a minimum size, and the smallest K in 2-6 within 0.03 of the best silhouette wins). Silhouettes are comparable between the scenarios on this page, not between species. Clusters are ordered weakest to strongest by mean contested wins. The scatter panels project the same 4,096 IV spreads onto each pair of battle stats; clusters that overlap completely in score separate cleanly there. A scenario is reported as degenerate (no clustering attempted) when it has fewer than 6 contested opponents or fewer than 8 distinct win patterns -- on that little data every candidate K scores near-perfectly, which is a measurement artifact and not structure -- and its bits are left out of the all scenarios fingerprint. A scenario that clears the floor but has no split keeping every cluster above the minimum size is reported as fragmented instead, and its bits still count toward the combined view. The all scenarios bits are ordered most-discriminating first, which is the tie-break the linkage uses when several merges are equally close. Replaces the retired score-gap cluster heuristic (2026-07), which usually (~77% of sampled runs) fired on float-level jitter in the opponent-averaged score, and even when it did catch a real tier could not name which matchups defined it.

Evidence

1. Header

Ninetales -- Ultra League

EMBER / OVERHEAT, WEATHER_BALL_FIRE (arm 1 of 5)

Level view: L50. Bake 2026-09-27. Blob 20260927_121549_Ninetales_ultra.replay.pkl.gz.

Opponent pool: 63 entries (Custom pool from ul_top60.txt (60 mons)). Grid: 4096 IV spreads x 9 shield scenarios.

Opponent-IV settings baked: PvPoke-default opponent IVs; PvPoke-default opponent IVs, focal never baits; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits.

Rankings snapshot 2026-09-27.

2. Floor

17 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

17 single-stat values do separate a cell exactly (16 on attack, 1 on Def, 0 on HP, over 92 contested cells), but none of them clears every gate while splitting between 25% and 60% of the grid, which is what an exact line has to do to carry a floor label.

The closest dirty thresholds on this dive, printed as evidence and not as lines:

At the one decimal place PvPoke and Poke Genie display, the top row reads Atk >= 148.7, which selects 2048 spreads where the exact value selects 2048: 0 more spreads land inside a line printed that way. The table prints the exact value because it is the one that selects the set the counts beside it describe.

A split is listed only when it puts fewer spreads on the wrong side than the constant rule does (predict one outcome for the whole grid) and when it keeps between 10% and 90% of the grid on each side.

cell	rank	closest split	spreads on the wrong side	constant rule gets wrong	wins at/above	wins below
0v0 Empoleon (Shadow)	rank 9	Atk >= 148.73	132	1916	1916 of 2048	0 of 2048
2v2 Mimikyu	rank 10	HP >= 155	297	2017	1910 of 2038	169 of 2058
1v0 Talonflame	rank 38	Atk >= 147.05	460	1996	2100 of 2560	0 of 1536
2v1 Runerigus	rank 43	Atk >= 147.05	8	1528	2560 of 2560	8 of 1536

3. Lines on the other stats

No axis carries a line on this arm, so there is nothing to compare across them.

4. Example spreads

Existence proofs; each selection rule is printed with its spread.

There is no line on this arm, so the rules run over the whole grid rather than over a set of clearers.

The spread winning the most matchups on this grid is 10/15/13 with 309 of 567, so the whole IV decision here is 4 matchups wide.

rule	IVs	level	Atk / Def / HP	stat product	contested cells	all cells
most cells won on the whole grid	10/15/13	L50.0	150.41 / 172.26 / 159	99.31% (#13)	86	309
highest stat product (the rank-1 spread)	9/15/15	L50.0	149.57 / 172.26 / 161	100.00% (#1)	82	305
bulkiest (max Def x HP) among the whole grid with SP >= 95%	1/15/15	L50.0	142.85 / 172.26 / 161	95.51% (#714)	57	280

Cells won by shield scenario

spread	0v0	0v1	0v2	1v0	1v1	1v2	2v0	2v1	2v2	total
rank-1 9/15/15	35	19	6	47	38	23	51	48	38	305
10/15/13	35	19	7	47	38	23	53	48	39	309
9/15/15	35	19	6	47	38	23	51	48	38	305
1/15/15	30	19	4	45	35	19	50	46	32	280

5. Rank-1 check

Stat-product rank-1 is 9/15/15 at L50.0: 149.57 attack / 172.26 Def / 161 HP. It wins 305 of 567 cells (82 of the 92 contested ones).

There is no floor on this arm, so there is no line for it to be on one side of.

The lowest material rung it misses is 150.35 (2v2 Snorlax).

It is a member of the Alternative target below.

6. Alternative target

Def >= 163.01: 3071 spreads (75.0%), stat product 82.6% to 100.0% of rank-1, attack 142.01-154.62.

75.0% of the grid already satisfies this, so it is not a target to hunt for. Read it the other way round: the 25.0% of spreads outside it lose 1 contested matchup that every member wins: 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3).

Rule: among (Def, HP) rectangles with at least 100 members, the one winning the most contested cells with EVERY member that at most 1% of the spreads outside it win, counting only cells against a top-50 opponent in a non-degenerate scenario; ties broken by member count.

Members win 229-309 cells in total.

IV envelope of the members -- attack IV 0-15, Def IV 4-15, HP IV 0-15. Members per attack IV: 0: 192, 1: 192, 2: 192, 3: 192, 4: 192, 5: 192, 6: 192, 7: 192, 8: 192, 9: 192, 10: 192, 11: 192, 12: 192, 13: 192, 14: 192, 15: 191.

Highest stat product inside it: 9/15/15 at L50.0 (100.00% of rank-1), 11/15/14 at L49.5 (99.90% of rank-1), 10/13/15 at L50.0 (99.58% of rank-1), 9/14/15 at L50.0 (99.51% of rank-1), 10/14/14 at L50.0 (99.45% of rank-1).

7. Cost

This test finds no reverse single-stat clean cut: no cell on this dive is won by every LOW spread and lost by every high one.

8. Rungs above

No floor on this arm, so no ladder above one.

9. Material clean cuts

Clean cuts holding between 10% and 90% of the grid, ascending. The widest of them sit under nearly every spread on the grid; the narrow ones at the bottom of the table do not.

cut	cells owned	spreads	settings	mechanism
Atk >= 144.53	1v0 Seaking (rank 45)	3328 (81.2%)	4/4	Mechanism: OVERHEAT damage steps 67 -> 68 across the cut.
Atk >= 145.37	2v2 Dusknoir (rank 24)	3072 (75.0%)	2/4	Mechanism: OVERHEAT damage steps 66 -> 67 across the cut.
Atk >= 146.21	1v1 Skeledirge (rank 20), 2v2 Walrein (rank 40), 2v2 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41)	2816 (68.8%)	2-4 of 4	1v1 Skeledirge: Mechanism: EMBER damage steps 2 -> 3 across the cut. 2v2 Walrein: Mechanism: charge-move priority against Walrein. That Walrein is built at 4/13/14, L38.5, 145.41 attack; 1.0 x 145.41 = 145.41, which falls in the gap (145.37, 146.22] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself. 2v2 Walrein (Shadow): Mechanism: charge-move priority against Walrein (Shadow). That Walrein (Shadow) is built at 4/13/14, L38.5, 145.41 attack; 1.0 x 145.41 = 145.41, which falls in the gap (145.37, 146.22] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself.
Atk >= 147.05	1v2 Steelix (rank 44), 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38)	2560 (62.5%)	2-4 of 4	1v2 Steelix: Mechanism: OVERHEAT damage steps 100 -> 101 across the cut. 2v1 Talonflame: Mechanism: EMBER damage steps 2 -> 3 across the cut.
Atk >= 147.89	1v2 Empoleon (rank 8)	2304 (56.2%)	2/4	Mechanism: OVERHEAT damage steps 99 -> 100 across the cut.
Atk >= 148.73	0v0 Bellibolt (rank 57)	2048 (50.0%)	2/4	Mechanism: charge-move priority against Bellibolt. That Bellibolt is built at 4/15/15, L39.5, 148.05 attack; 1.0 x 148.05 = 148.05, which falls in the gap (147.89, 148.74] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself.
Atk >= 149.57	1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13)	1792 (43.8%)	4/4	Mechanism: charge-move priority against Moltres (Galarian). That Moltres (Galarian) is built at 4/11/11, L29.5, 149.47 attack; 1.0 x 149.47 = 149.47, which falls in the gap (148.73, 149.58] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself.
Atk >= 150.35	2v2 Snorlax (rank 11)	1533 (37.4%)	2/4	Mechanism: OVERHEAT damage steps 116 -> 117 across the cut.
Atk >= 152.31	0v0 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 54)	740 (18.1%)	4/4	Mechanism unattributed: no priority line, damage step or bulkpoint sits in the gap.
Atk >= 153.69	2v0 Cramorant (rank 18)	423 (10.3%)	4/4	Mechanism: EMBER damage steps 2 -> 3 across the cut.

10. Bulk

Clean cuts by axis: 16 on attack, 1 on Def, 0 on HP.

11. Coverage

Omitted: there is no floor on this arm, so there is no line to place.

12. Mirror

Against the pool's own Ninetales entry. Seat: our side is the optimised row; the mirror opponent always baits.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 3800 0 0 4096 1604 5 4096 4096 597.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 3800 0 0 4096 1604 5 4096 4096 597.

shields	win rate over the whole grid
0v0	88.6%
0v1	0.0%
0v2	0.0%
1v0	100.0%
1v1	30.3%
1v2	2.3%
2v0	100.0%
2v1	100.0%
2v2	32.2%

13. Changes the score, not the matchup

Cells won (or lost) by every spread where the battle score still steps by at least 60 at one attainable attack value.

Ordered by how close the step comes to the win line (500), nearest first: the question this field answers is how close a cell is to becoming a matchup, not how large the swing inside it is.

12 of 32 steps are listed, closest to the win line first; 20 more are not.

value	cell	rank	score step	points from 500	outcome
Atk >= 144.53	2v1 Feraligatr (Shadow)	rank 14	342 -> 465	35 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 146.21	0v2 Registeel	rank 28	261 -> 458	42 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 152.09	0v1 Malamar (Shadow)	rank 54	275 -> 458	42 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 154.15	1v0 Talonflame (Shadow)	rank 56	333 -> 458	42 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 154.61	0v0 Runerigus	rank 43	334 -> 453	47 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 153.69	2v1 Cramorant	rank 18	283 -> 445	55 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 151.25	0v1 Steelix	rank 44	297 -> 444	56 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 152.93	1v0 Primarina	rank 51	280 -> 441	59 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 152.77	1v1 Seaking	rank 45	316 -> 430	70 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 151.11	2v2 Cresselia (Shadow)	rank 46	580 -> 645	80 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 146.21	1v0 Moltres (Galarian)	rank 13	583 -> 733	83 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 147.05	2v0 Talonflame	rank 38	593 -> 824	93 (widening)	won on both sides

14. Not claimed

75 of 92 contested matchups have no clean single-stat rule and are not claimed.

6 of 58 top-50 matchups are listed, one per base species and closest to an even split first; 52 more are not.

cell	rank	win rate over the whole grid
2v0 Milotic (Shadow)	rank 50	50.1%
2v2 Mimikyu	rank 10	50.8%
1v1 Walrein	rank 40	49.2%
1v0 Talonflame	rank 38	51.3%
1v2 Clefable	rank 37	47.6%
1v1 Deoxys (Defense)	rank 42	53.1%

15. How sure

16 clean attack cuts, 1 on Def, 0 on HP, over 92 contested cells (223 cells are won by every spread, 252 lost by every spread).

Scenarios barred from carrying a floor -- fewer than 6 contested cells, or fewer than 8 distinct opponent columns among them; the dive page's "degenerate" flag applies the same two numbers to its own stricter counts, so it can flag a different set: 0v2 (5 contested, 7 distinct opponent columns), 2v0 (5 contested, 7 distinct opponent columns).

Not measured here: opponent IVs outside the baked cohorts, post-match HP and shields, XL or dust cost, and any live-game check of the priority convention.

16. Provenance

Every threshold in this section is one of three things, and each is badged where it is printed. An EXACT clean cut: every spread at or above it wins the named cell and no spread below it does. A ONE-SIDED GATE: one side is pure and the other is at least 97% pure -- either nothing below it wins (clearing it is necessary) or everything at or above it wins (clearing it is sufficient). A NEAR-EXACT split: at most 0.5% of the grid sits on the wrong side of it in total. The win predicate is gopvpsim.battle.is_win (score > 500; 500 itself is a tie, not a win).

That is stricter than the two numbers the dive page prints for the same opponent: the Threats "flips at" boundary (a 75/25 gate, so spreads on the passing side can still lose) and the Matchup clusters flip table's single-stat split for that one opponent (the most accurate such split, misclassifications allowed). The cluster line in "How sure" above is a third thing again: not one opponent but the stat rule that reproduces that section's "all scenarios" partition of the whole grid.

Priority ties: the coverage ladder counts an exact attack tie as NOT beaten. The engine is seat-dependent on an exact tie, so a tied line is not a guarantee in either direction.

Ranks and opponent builds are read live from the 2026-09-27 rankings snapshot and the current gamemaster; this blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so the render is a function of the blob plus those two live reads.

Auto-derived: this section is generated by scripts/deep_dive_brief.py from the replay blob. No human prose is in it.

How the line was selected (gates and guards)

Decision band for the floor (D1): the lowest ELIGIBLE rung whose clearer pool sits inside [25%, 60%] of the grid. Materiality band for a rung: [10%, 90%].

To be ELIGIBLE AS THE FLOOR -- not to be listed as a rung -- a cut needs at least 20 attack/20 defense/5 HP distinct attainable values below it, an opponent of rank 50 or better outside the caveat list, a non-degenerate shield scenario, a win rate at or above the cut of at least 90% in every setting, and a closed-form mechanism. Listing is a weaker bar: a rung is printed when it keeps 25% of the grid (above the floor) or sits in the materiality band (below it) AND points the same way in at least 2 settings, so a listed rung may be unattributed, low-ranked or 2-of-4.

A cut can fail several gates at once, so the failure tally below sums to more than the number of cuts.

Co-gate sub-rectangles need 5% of the grid; the alternative target needs 100 members; a score-only step needs 60 points. These constants are calibrated on one species and are parameters of the stage that uses them, not tuned per dive.

Floor pool by primitive on the attack axis -- the axis the cross-stat rule selected -- each selected on its own under the same band and the same gates: exact -> Atk >= 147.89 (1v2 Empoleon, 56.2%) rejected on G-material-gap, G-direction (2 of 4 settings); one-sided gate -> no candidate in the band; near-exact -> no candidate in the band. Selected: no floor. Selection takes the lowest eligible rung in the band; a stronger primitive within 0.50 stat points of it wins the tie, in the order exact, one-sided gate, near-exact. A gate needs 97% of its dirty side pointing the right way; a near-exact split needs at most 0.5% of the grid on the wrong side. Only exact rungs merge, in either direction.

Degradation ladder: rung reached = c. 17 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

Of 17 clean cuts, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-material-gap 15, G-direction 8, G-material-hi 3, G-rank 2, G-attributed 1, G-scenario 1.

Of 16 one-sided gate and near-exact candidates, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-material-gap 16, G-material-hi 15, G-attributed 15.

G-cmp-fresh (WARN, not a failure): 1 cut(s) have a live priority line within 0.50 attack of the cut but outside its gap, so they print unattributed: 0v0 Malamar (Shadow). This blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so a rebalance since the bake would look exactly like this.

Closest dirty thresholds on cells with no clean rule: 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) Atk >= 148.73 (132 spreads on the wrong side); 2v2 Mimikyu HP >= 155 (297 spreads on the wrong side); 1v0 Talonflame Atk >= 147.05 (460 spreads on the wrong side); 2v1 Runerigus Atk >= 147.05 (8 spreads on the wrong side).

band	attack line it selects	cell
[25%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 55%]	no floor	-
[25%, 50%]	no floor	-
[20%, 60%]	no floor	-
[30%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 70%]	no floor	-

Terms used here

build criteria: Which shield scenarios the ranking counts: all nine equally, the three even ones, or 1v1 alone.
build: A region of the IV grid you can aim at -- every spread that clears the same combination of thresholds, at least fifty of them.
guaranteed: Won by every single spread in the region, not by most of them.
decision matchup: A (shield scenario, opponent) pair the IV choice decides: a top-50 opponent that some spreads on this grid beat and others lose to.
wide: The looser rule drawn around a region of the grid: it holds every spread that region holds and more, so it wins less for every member but is easier to hit.
stat-product rank-1 (SP1): The IV spread with the largest attack x defense x HP at this league's CP cap -- the bulk-first spread most IV tools list first. Written SP1 where it is named repeatedly.
material: A matchup no single-stat threshold of a hundred or more spreads wins more than 95% of the time, so it takes two stats at once to claim it.
opponent-IV mode: One of the ways every opponent was made for this bake -- PvPoke-default IVs or the bulkiest ones, each with and without the focal side baiting -- so a claim that holds in all of them does not depend on how the opponent was made.
stat product: Attack x defense x HP at the league's CP cap, the usual one-number summary of an IV spread.
bulk box: A rule that is a defense floor and an HP floor and nothing else -- a rectangle on the defense / HP plane.
staircase: A rule whose defense floor steps DOWN as HP goes up, so bulk can be spent on either stat: one floor per HP value rather than one floor for all of them.
outside rate: How often the spreads left OUT of a region win the same matchup its own members all win -- one the rest of the grid takes anyway is not what you bought.
charge-move priority (CMP): When both sides throw a charged move on the same turn, the higher attack stat goes first.
UpSet plot: A bar chart of set intersections: each column is one candidate region, and the dots under it mark which named sets it lies inside (Lex et al. 2014).
contested matchups: The matchups some IV spreads on this grid win and others lose -- the only ones an IV choice can change.
bulkpoint: A defense value across which an opponent's damage into you steps down by a whole point, or an HP value across which the number of hits they need to knock you out changes.
one-sided gate: A stat value with one clean side: either nothing below it wins the matchup, or everything at or above it does -- so clearing it is required, or enough, but not both.
rung: An attack value above the line at which some further matchup flips for every spread that reaches it.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 151.40 and Def + 2.125*HP >= 496.59	608	42 of 65, 1 of them material; 33 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (outside 28%)	nothing the other builds guarantee	12/15/7 (305 of 567 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (42 of 65), its 608 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (6) 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 31%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 39%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 47%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 59% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 69% 0v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 86% 0v2 (2) 0v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 34% 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (5) 1v0 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 54% 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 64% 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 85% 1v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 85% 1v1 (8) 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 28%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 41% 1v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 43% 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 48% 1v2 (5) 1v2 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 52% 1v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 56%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 63% 1v2 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 63% 2v0 (1) 2v0 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 50% 2v1 (4) 2v1 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 43% 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 63% 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 65% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 76% 2v2 (8) 2v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 31%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 34%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 53% 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 71% Members (608), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 150.70 and Def + 1.5*HP >= 390	1365	23 of 65, 0 of them material; 16 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	19: 0v0 Moltres (Galarian), 0v0 Deoxys (Defense), +17 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 97% of the same spreads (38 extra, 4 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 608 spreads in 1365 of its own, and keeps 23 of Build 1's 42 guaranteed matchups (none of them material). The 19 it gives up out here: 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (grid 39%), 0v0 Toucannon (grid 41%) and 2v2 Ninetales (grid 42%), and 16 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	~ Atk >= 148.00 and HP >= 158	755	36 of 65, 0 of them material; 27 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (outside 25%)	6: 0v0 Toucannon, 0v2 Clefable, +4 more	9/14/12 (309 of 567 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (36 of 65), its 755 members The rule covers 98% of the same spreads (18 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the build. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 37%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 45%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 58%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 65% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 67% 0v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 86% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 58%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (5) 1v0 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 52% 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 62% 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 84% 1v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 85% 1v1 (7) 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 25%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 40%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 46% 1v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 56% 1v2 (4) 1v2 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 62% 1v2 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 62%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (1) 2v0 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 48% 2v1 (4) 2v1 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 40% 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 62% 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 63% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 75% 2v2 (6) 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 51% 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 69% 2v2 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 69% 2v2 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 77%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (755), highest stat product first

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	272	149.2	162.3	150	#2308-#4096	2.4	-
C1	1673	145.4	167.3	156	#5-#4063	5.2	Annihilape (+100pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (+100pp), Deoxys (Defense) (+77pp), Galarian Moltres (+55pp); trades away Bellibolt (-56pp), Shadow Empoleon (-38pp), Shadow Malamar (-31pp)
C2	2151	151.9	167.0	156	#1-#3703	9.8	Shadow Empoleon (+100pp), Bellibolt (+100pp), Walrein (+91pp), Toucannon (+78pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2
Walrein	6%	0%	91%
Shadow Empoleon	38%	0%	100%
Bellibolt	56%	0%	100%
Toucannon	0%	0%	78%
Galarian Moltres	0%	55%	82%
Shadow Malamar	31%	0%	51%
Deoxys (Defense)	0%	77%	77%
Shadow Ampharos	62%	78%	100%
Annihilape	0%	100%	100%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	0%	100%	100%
Shadow Walrein	0%	10%	5%
Ninetales	43%	97%	99%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Walrein	48%	wins iff atk >= 148.77	92%	named
Shadow Empoleon	55%	wins iff atk >= 148.77	99%	named
Bellibolt	56%	wins iff atk >= 148.77	100%	named
Toucannon	41%	wins iff atk >= 149.18	91%	named
Galarian Moltres	65%	wins iff hp >= 152	75%	named
Shadow Malamar	29%	wins iff atk >= 152.15	100%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	71%	wins iff hp >= 153	83%	named
Shadow Ampharos	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,647,213	94%	named
Annihilape	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,542,539	95%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,542,539	95%	named
Shadow Walrein	7%	wins iff sp >= 4,097,943	95%	named
Ninetales	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,568,344	96%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	784	149.2	163.6	151	#1264-#4096	1.9	-
C1	625	149.1	162.9	157	#808-#3964	4.6	Galarian Moltres (+97pp), Shadow Cresselia (+89pp), Cresselia (+57pp), Shadow Ampharos (+28pp); trades away Rillaboom (-16pp)
C2	2687	149.0	168.6	156	#1-#3928	6.2	Rillaboom (+97pp), Shadow Ampharos (+72pp), Alolan Muk (+57pp); trades away Galarian Moltres (-67pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2
Galarian Moltres	0%	97%	30%
Rillaboom	16%	0%	97%
Shadow Ampharos	0%	28%	100%
Alolan Muk	37%	35%	92%
Shadow Cresselia	0%	89%	91%
Cresselia	43%	100%	99%
Ampharos	9%	10%	13%
Clefable	88%	100%	100%

Moveset: Switching movesets reloads the page; pasted CSV will need to be re-loaded. Shields: Build criteria: Opponent IVs: Bait: Y-axis: Color: Anchors: Build criteria weights shield scenarios in: Which one to build?, the all-scenarios clusters, and Shields = All (by build criteria). Nothing else on this page is re-weighted by it. Threshold tiers (e.g. GH Great / GH Good) are expert stat-cutoff regions defined in Threshold Tiers below. Hover legend to isolate; click to lock.

Check my collection - Your collection stays in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Paste your Poke Genie CSV export below, or click Choose file… to load one from disk. You’ll see which of your Ninetales (and pre-evolutions) qualify for each tier, overlaid on the scatter plot.

Show only my mons

Or enter one at a time - Atk/Def/HP IVs (0-15), level, shadow flag. Same format as PvPoke / PvPIVs.

Species Atk Def HP Level Shadow

Compare candidates - up to 7 of your IV spreads, side by side: wins, mirror, and the close calls that decide the build

Add a spread: Atk Def HP 0 / 7 added

Highlight IVs:

Top IVs Rows: Ranked by this dive's battle simulation (not fetched from PvPoke). Click any column header to sort.

Battle-Rating Distribution

Per-matchup battle-rating distribution for the reference IV (PvPoke default or Rank 1, matching the Opponent-IVs dropdown) across the opponent pool, under the currently-selected Shields / Opponent-IVs / Bait.

Ember / Overheat, Weather Ball (Fire)

IV Recommendations

Moveset: Ember / Overheat, Weather Ball (Fire). Vs PvPoke default opponents.

IV Flavor Guide (Simulation)

Auto-generated from simulation matchup data. Flavor names (e.g. "Premium Bulk", "Fortified {Opp}", "{Opp} Slayer") are derived from which opponents each IV cluster beats, not from the expert-authored Threshold Tiers section above. This IV Flavor Guide and the Threshold Tiers answer different questions and may not line up 1:1. New to flavor cards? The IV Flavor Guide walks through the six name families and the trade-off layout.

In Ultra League, Ninetales has 4 flavors: General Good, Fortified Dusknoir, Cramorant Slayer, and Guzzlord Slayer. In general, the General Good variation may be the flavor of choice, as it plays up Ninetales's potential vs Ampharos (Shadow), Ampharos, Annihilape, among others.

Flavor	IVs	%	Catches needed
General Good [Recommended]	3150	76.9%	almost any will do
Fortified Dusknoir	87	2.1%	~33-65 for a 50-75% chance
Cramorant Slayer	198	4.8%	~14-28 for a 50-75% chance
Guzzlord Slayer	235	5.7%	~12-24 for a 50-75% chance

General Good (142.07 Atk, 159.69 Def, 150 HP) [Recommended]

159.69 Def and 150 HP is a safe baseline for Ninetales, with an attack floor of 142.07 Atk for coverage against key opponents.

150 HP is also a safe spot, helping secure the mirror and key matchups vs Ampharos, Annihilape.

160.50 Def with 150+ HP for Ampharos (1v1), Corviknight (incl. Shadow) (1v2), Cresselia (incl. Shadow) (0v1), Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v1), Florges (1v1), Lapras (incl. Shadow) (1v0, 1v1, 2v1), Melmetal (1v2), Mimikyu (2v2), Ninetales (1v1), Snorlax (incl. Shadow) (2v2), Walrein (1v0, 1v1), Muk (Alolan) (0v1)
161.34 Def with 155+ HP for the Steelix (incl. Shadow) (0v2)
161.70 Def with 151+ HP for Ampharos (incl. Shadow) (0v1, 1v2), Muk (Alolan) (0v1), Steelix (incl. Shadow) (0v2), Rillaboom (0v1)
162.53 Def with 157+ HP for the Annihilape (2v2)
163.37 Def with 156+ HP for Ampharos (incl. Shadow) (0v1), Rillaboom (0v1), Florges (1v1)
164.21 Def with 157+ HP for Annihilape (2v2), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v2)
165.73 Def for the Cradily (incl. Shadow) (1v0)
166.56 Def with 158+ HP for the Miltank (2v1)

Fortified Dusknoir (171.75 Def, 156 HP)

The "Fortified Dusknoir" Ninetales fortifies its bulk to gain several matchups including the Dusknoir (Shadow) 1v1, 1v2, the Annihilape 2v2, the Empoleon (Shadow) 1v2. This requires 171.75 Def with 156 HP.

Cramorant Slayer (153.41 Atk, 154 HP)

The "Cramorant Slayer" Ninetales trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Cramorant 2v0, the Ampharos 0v1, the Clefable 0v2. Ninetales would need 153.41 Atk while maintaining 154 HP.

Guzzlord Slayer (153.15 Atk, 154 HP)

The "Guzzlord Slayer" Ninetales trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Guzzlord 2v0, the Clefable 0v2, the Cramorant 2v0. Ninetales would need 153.15 Atk while maintaining 154 HP.

Rank-1 Ninetales (9/15/15) meets the General Good thresholds.

Simulation-Derived IV Tiers

Auto-derived from the sim (not expert-authored).

Threshold Tiers

Stat-target headlines from thresholds/*.toml, each grouped with the named anchors its spec clears and the IV spreads that meet it. Within each tier card, bullets are grouped by opponent and sorted by the required stat (Def or Atk) ascending - read top-to-bottom in the order a player would clear them as their stat grows. The flat list of every anchor (regardless of tier) lives in Anchor-Driven Matchup Flips below. New to tier cards? The Threshold Tiers guide walks through what the stat cutoffs and member counts mean. A tier's anchors come from two passes over the anchor list:

Primary bullets - the tier has a cutoff on the anchor's target axis (atk or def) that meets or exceeds the anchor's threshold. Consequences:
- Subset case: if tier A is strictly stricter than tier B on the anchor axis, A's bullet list is a superset of B's. Overlap is intentional.
- Crossed-cutoff case: tier A has only an atk cutoff, tier B has only a def cutoff - neither is a subset of the other. Atk anchors appear only on A; def anchors only on B.
- Slayer-axis IV-count case: two tiers can list the same atk anchor but have different member-IV counts because a stricter tier's def cutoff excludes def-sacrificing spreads that the looser tier keeps. Check the (−N vs parent) callout on the tier header to spot this at a glance.
Anchors we get for free (collapsed) - the tier has no cutoff on the anchor's target axis, but every IV in the tier clears the anchor's threshold anyway. These would be silently dropped by the primary filter; we surface them in a separate collapsed block so the card isn't misleading.

Fortified Dusknoir · def≥171.75, hp≥156 (87 IV spreads) (−908 vs Dusknoir (Shadow) Bulk (def-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 152 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Annihilape, Shadow Corviknight, +20 more. Matchup flips vs Dusknoir (Shadow), Empoleon (Shadow), Miltank (4 scenarios, 180 IVs).

160.04 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
160.21 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
161.16 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
161.24 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Outrage) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
161.76 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Superpower) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
162.71 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Lick) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
162.71 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Psywave) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
162.71 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
163.64 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
159.80 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Payback) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v2)
161.26 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Sky Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v2)
161.26 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Air Cutter) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v2)
163.18 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v2)
165.86 Def + 155 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Air Slash) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v2)
160.00 Def + 151 HP for Melmetal (Flash Cannon) vs Melmetal (1v2)
160.44 Def + 153 HP for Melmetal (Double Iron Bash) vs Melmetal (1v2)
160.93 Def + 151 HP for Melmetal (Hyper Beam) vs Melmetal (1v2)
161.36 Def + 151 HP for Melmetal (Rock Slide) vs Melmetal (1v2)
161.74 Def + 152 HP for Melmetal (Superpower) vs Melmetal (1v2)
162.08 Def + 152 HP for Melmetal (Thunderbolt) vs Melmetal (1v2)
162.08 Def + 152 HP for Melmetal (Dynamic Punch) vs Melmetal (1v2)
162.52 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
162.54 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
162.83 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
163.05 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
163.75 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
165.79 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Steel Wing) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
166.74 Def + 159 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
161.03 Def + 153 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (2v2)
162.15 Def + 153 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (2v2)
162.91 Def + 153 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (2v2)
165.72 Def + 159 HP for Snorlax (Outrage) vs Snorlax (1v0)
165.90 Def + 160 HP for Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (1v0)
166.03 Def + 159 HP for Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Snorlax (1v0)
166.88 Def + 160 HP for Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Snorlax (1v0)
167.03 Def + 159 HP for Snorlax (Superpower) vs Snorlax (1v0)
167.87 Def + 161 HP for Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Snorlax (1v0)
159.78 Def + 152 HP for Florges (Psychic) vs Florges (1v1)
160.09 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (1v1)
160.21 Def + 152 HP for Florges (Chilling Water) vs Florges (1v1)
160.92 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v1)
162.71 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Trailblaze) vs Florges (1v1)
164.27 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (1v1)
161.93 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
162.37 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
162.59 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
162.72 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
165.98 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Scratch) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
165.98 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
159.83 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (2v1)
159.96 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (2v1)
160.43 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Blizzard) vs Lapras (2v1)
160.78 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Surf) vs Lapras (2v1)
161.17 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (2v1)
161.74 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (2v1)
163.29 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (2v1)
167.21 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Water Gun) vs Lapras (2v1)
159.83 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
160.03 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
160.10 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
160.32 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
160.52 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
161.37 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
162.17 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
169.14 Def + 155 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
169.40 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 1v2)
169.85 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Ominous Wind) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
169.85 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
170.75 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
170.75 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
171.49 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Shadow Punch) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
159.69 Def + 153 HP for Ninetales (Overheat) vs Ninetales (1v1)
159.98 Def + 154 HP for Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Ninetales (1v1)
161.23 Def + 153 HP for Ninetales (Fire Blast) vs Ninetales (1v1)
161.27 Def + 151 HP for Ninetales (Scorching Sands) vs Ninetales (1v1)
161.63 Def + 154 HP for Ninetales (Solar Beam) vs Ninetales (1v1)
161.79 Def + 151 HP for Ninetales (Flamethrower) vs Ninetales (1v1)
162.15 Def + 158 HP for Ninetales (Fire Spin) vs Ninetales (1v1)
162.58 Def + 154 HP for Ninetales (Heat Wave) vs Ninetales (1v1)
163.79 Def + 153 HP for Ninetales (Energy Ball) vs Ninetales (1v1)
163.79 Def + 151 HP for Ninetales (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Ninetales (1v1)
160.10 Def for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (0v1)
160.87 Def + 149 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (0v1)
160.87 Def + 149 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (0v1)
161.38 Def for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (0v1)
163.80 Def for Alolan Muk (Poison Jab) vs Alolan Muk (0v1)
160.07 Def + 150 HP for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (1v0, 1v1)
160.07 Def + 150 HP for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (1v0, 1v1)
160.60 Def + 152 HP for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (1v1)
161.31 Def + 152 HP for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (1v1)
167.52 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
167.52 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
167.74 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
170.13 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Walrein (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
170.13 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
171.11 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Walrein (Waterfall) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
159.91 Def + 153 HP for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v1)
161.26 Def + 153 HP for Deoxys Defense (Rock Slide) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v1)
162.12 Def + 154 HP for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v1)
162.55 Def + 153 HP for Deoxys Defense (Zen Headbutt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v1)
160.96 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
162.13 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
162.13 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
160.73 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Steelix (Crunch) vs Shadow Steelix (0v2)
161.34 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Steelix (Earthquake) vs Shadow Steelix (0v2)
161.99 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Steelix (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Steelix (0v2)
164.56 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Steelix (Psychic Fangs) vs Shadow Steelix (0v2)
164.56 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Steelix (Breaking Swipe) vs Shadow Steelix (0v2)
160.14 Def for Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (1v1)
160.83 Def for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (1v1)
160.98 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (1v1, 1v2)
161.26 Def for Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (1v1)
161.66 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos (Thunder) vs Ampharos (1v1, 1v2)
162.35 Def for Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Ampharos (1v1)
162.55 Def for Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Ampharos (1v1)
162.60 Def for Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Ampharos (1v1)
163.04 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Ampharos (1v2)
161.66 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
162.49 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
162.49 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
162.91 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
164.19 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Acid) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
164.19 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
160.76 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
160.83 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
160.98 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
161.32 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
161.32 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
161.89 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
162.14 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
163.36 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
165.05 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
160.60 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Flame Charge) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
161.40 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
162.01 Def + 155 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Hurricane) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
162.28 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Fire Blast) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
162.41 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Fly) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
170.71 Def for Shadow Talonflame (Incinerate) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
160.08 Def + 156 HP for Annihilape (Low Sweep) vs Annihilape (2v2)
161.11 Def + 156 HP for Annihilape (Close Combat) vs Annihilape (2v2)
161.53 Def + 156 HP for Annihilape (Ice Punch) vs Annihilape (2v2)
161.53 Def + 156 HP for Annihilape (Night Slash) vs Annihilape (2v2)
161.82 Def + 156 HP for Annihilape (Shadow Ball) vs Annihilape (2v2)
162.46 Def + 156 HP for Annihilape (Rage Fist) vs Annihilape (2v2)
165.41 Def + 157 HP for Annihilape (Counter) vs Annihilape (2v2)
162.22 Def + 158 HP for Miltank (Stomp) vs Miltank (2v1)
162.52 Def + 158 HP for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (2v1)
162.73 Def + 158 HP for Miltank (High Horsepower) vs Miltank (2v1)
163.86 Def + 158 HP for Miltank (Gyro Ball) vs Miltank (2v1)
164.33 Def + 158 HP for Miltank (Body Slam) vs Miltank (2v1)
165.17 Def + 159 HP for Miltank (Rollout) vs Miltank (2v1)
165.91 Def + 158 HP for Miltank (Ice Beam) vs Miltank (2v1)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

167.39 Def flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v2) [1526 IVs]
164.21 Def flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v2) [2559 IVs]

Member IVs (87)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
9/15/15 👑	149.57	172.26	161	#1	+3	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
9/15/14	149.57	172.26	160	#2	+0	-1.0	-3.7	+0.3
11/15/14 👑	150.80	171.75	160	#3	+5	-0.7	-9.2	-0.1
10/15/13 👑	150.41	172.26	159	#4	+5	-1.0	-7.3	-1.0
8/15/15	148.73	172.26	161	#5	+0	-3.6	-4.1	-6.0
9/15/13	149.57	172.26	159	#8	+0	-2.3	-7.7	-3.5
10/15/14	149.97	171.75	160	#9	+0	-1.9	-7.9	-2.7
10/15/15	149.97	171.75	160	#10	+0	-1.9	-7.9	-2.7
11/15/10 👑	151.25	172.26	157	#13	-4	-4.0	-10.3	-3.0
11/15/11 👑	151.25	172.26	157	#14	-4	-4.0	-10.3	-3.0
10/15/12	150.41	172.26	158	#17	-1	-2.5	-7.5	-4.5
12/15/12 👑	151.64	171.75	158	#18	+2	-2.3	-6.6	-2.3
11/15/13	150.80	171.75	159	#20	+3	-1.9	-16.0	-2.7
8/15/14	148.73	172.26	160	#23	+0	-4.6	-7.7	-5.8
12/15/9 👑	152.09	172.26	156	#27	-1	-3.8	-7.7	-8.2
12/15/11	151.64	171.75	157	#28	+0	-5.6	-5.7	-4.6
10/15/10	150.41	172.26	157	#31	-5	-5.7	-9.0	-6.7
10/15/11	150.41	172.26	157	#32	-5	-5.7	-9.0	-6.7
7/15/15	147.89	172.26	161	#37	+0	-8.5	-5.6	-6.9
9/15/12	149.57	172.26	158	#39	+0	-3.8	-7.9	-7.0
11/15/12	150.80	171.75	158	#46	-2	-3.5	-10.7	-6.2
11/15/9	151.25	172.26	156	#74	-7	-5.1	-11.8	-8.7
8/15/13	148.73	172.26	159	#94	+0	-5.8	-11.7	-9.6
9/15/10	149.57	172.26	157	#96	+0	-7.1	-9.3	-9.1
9/15/11	149.57	172.26	157	#97	+0	-7.1	-9.3	-9.1
7/15/14	147.89	172.26	160	#154	+0	-9.4	-9.3	-6.7
12/15/10	151.64	171.75	156	#157	-3	-6.6	-7.2	-10.4
10/15/9	150.41	172.26	156	#173	-8	-6.3	-10.4	-12.5
6/15/15	147.05	172.26	161	#255	+0	-11.8	-10.4	-13.0
8/15/12	148.73	172.26	158	#263	+0	-7.2	-11.8	-13.2
9/15/9	149.57	172.26	156	#295	+0	-7.6	-10.8	-14.9
7/15/13	147.89	172.26	159	#302	+0	-10.4	-13.3	-10.5
8/15/10	148.73	172.26	157	#360	+0	-10.5	-13.2	-15.3
8/15/11	148.73	172.26	157	#361	+0	-10.5	-13.2	-15.3
6/15/14	147.05	172.26	160	#405	+0	-12.8	-14.0	-12.8
7/15/12	147.89	172.26	158	#432	+0	-11.8	-13.4	-14.0
8/15/9	148.73	172.26	156	#494	+0	-11.0	-14.7	-21.1
7/15/10	147.89	172.26	157	#512	+0	-14.9	-14.9	-16.2
7/15/11	147.89	172.26	157	#513	+0	-14.9	-14.9	-16.2
6/15/13	147.05	172.26	159	#518	+0	-13.8	-18.0	-16.6
5/15/15	146.21	172.26	161	#543	+0	-13.4	-14.5	-16.7
6/15/12	147.05	172.26	158	#620	+0	-15.2	-16.2	-20.2
7/15/9	147.89	172.26	156	#653	+0	-15.3	-16.3	-22.0
5/15/14	146.21	172.26	160	#657	+0	-14.4	-18.1	-16.6
6/15/10	147.05	172.26	157	#703	+0	-18.4	-17.6	-22.4
6/15/11	147.05	172.26	157	#704	+0	-18.4	-17.6	-22.4
4/15/15	145.37	172.26	161	#758	+0	-16.3	-18.6	-28.0
5/15/13	146.21	172.26	159	#771	+0	-15.4	-22.0	-20.5
6/15/9	147.05	172.26	156	#848	+0	-19.6	-17.9	-28.1
4/15/14	145.37	172.26	160	#886	+0	-17.2	-22.1	-27.7
… 37 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Cramorant Slayer · atk≥153.41, hp≥154 (198 IV spreads) (−37 vs Guzzlord Slayer (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 63 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Annihilape, Bellibolt, Clefable, +24 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Cramorant (3 scenario flips).

142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Ember) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Overheat) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
144.91 Atk for Empoleon (Ember) vs Empoleon (1v2)
144.91 Atk for Empoleon (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Empoleon (1v2)
145.65 Atk for Empoleon (Overheat) vs Empoleon (1v2)
147.38 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Overheat) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
147.59 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
148.82 Atk for Snorlax (Overheat) vs Snorlax (2v2)
151.41 Atk for Snorlax (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Snorlax (2v2)
143.73 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Overheat) vs Galarian Moltres (1v0, 1v1)
146.32 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Galarian Moltres (1v0, 1v1)
153.41 Atk for Cramorant (Ember) vs Cramorant (2v0)
153.41 Atk for Cramorant (Overheat) vs Cramorant (2v0)
153.41 Atk for Cramorant (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Cramorant (2v0)
153.15 Atk for Guzzlord (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Guzzlord (2v0)
143.20 Atk for Skeledirge (Overheat) vs Skeledirge (1v1, 2v1)
145.44 Atk for Skeledirge (Ember) vs Skeledirge (1v1, 2v1)
145.44 Atk for Skeledirge (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Skeledirge (1v1, 2v1)
142.54 Atk for Dusknoir (Ember) vs Dusknoir (0v0, 2v2)
142.54 Atk for Dusknoir (Overheat) vs Dusknoir (0v0, 2v2)
142.54 Atk for Dusknoir (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Dusknoir (0v0, 2v2)
151.31 Atk for Ninetales (Overheat) vs Ninetales (2v2)
152.21 Atk for Ninetales (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Ninetales (2v2)
146.11 Atk for Cresselia (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Cresselia (0v2, 1v2)
147.13 Atk for Cresselia (Overheat) vs Cresselia (0v2, 1v2)
144.65 Atk for Clefable (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Clefable (1v2)
144.89 Atk for Clefable (Overheat) vs Clefable (1v2)
144.26 Atk for Talonflame (Overheat) vs Talonflame (1v0, 2v1)
146.51 Atk for Talonflame (Ember) vs Talonflame (1v0, 2v1)
146.51 Atk for Talonflame (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Talonflame (1v0, 2v1)
142.08 Atk for Walrein (Ember) vs Walrein (2v1, 2v2)
142.08 Atk for Walrein (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
142.80 Atk for Walrein (Overheat) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
142.08 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Overheat) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
142.08 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
144.01 Atk for Runerigus (Overheat) vs Runerigus (2v1)
147.10 Atk for Runerigus (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Runerigus (2v1)
143.87 Atk for Steelix (Overheat) vs Steelix (1v2)
146.32 Atk for Steelix (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Steelix (1v2)
143.92 Atk for Seaking (Overheat) vs Seaking (1v0)
144.27 Atk for Seaking (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Seaking (1v0)
148.87 Atk for Toucannon (Overheat) vs Toucannon (0v0)
149.28 Atk for Toucannon (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Toucannon (0v0)
147.52 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Ember) vs Shadow Milotic (2v0)
147.52 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Milotic (2v0)
147.52 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Overheat) vs Shadow Milotic (2v0)
143.82 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Overheat) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 1v2, 2v2)
143.82 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 1v2, 2v2)
150.27 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Overheat) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v1)
150.58 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v1)
146.78 Atk for Bellibolt (Overheat) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
148.41 Atk for Bellibolt (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
150.80 Atk for Annihilape (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Annihilape (2v2)
151.25 Atk for Annihilape (Overheat) vs Annihilape (2v2)
142.80 Atk for Florges (Overheat) vs Florges (2v1)
143.34 Atk for Lapras (Overheat) vs Lapras (1v0)
144.08 Atk for Lapras (Ember) vs Lapras (1v0)
144.08 Atk for Lapras (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Lapras (1v0)
142.85 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Overheat) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
144.08 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
147.27 Atk for Ampharos (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Ampharos (1v2)
148.17 Atk for Ampharos (Overheat) vs Ampharos (1v2)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

142.85 Atk + 151 HP flips Shadow Cresselia (0v1) [3120 IVs]
142.85 Atk + 153 HP flips Melmetal (1v2) [2399 IVs]
142.85 Atk + 153 HP flips Mimikyu (2v2) [2399 IVs]
142.85 Atk + 150 HP flips Shadow Ampharos (0v1) [3360 IVs]
142.85 Atk + 153 HP flips Deoxys (Defense) (0v0) [2399 IVs]
142.85 Atk + 152 HP flips Melmetal (1v2) [2879 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)

Member IVs (198)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/10/10 👑	153.77	168.06	157	#56	+2	-2.2	-7.3	-17.1
15/11/11	153.70	167.90	157	#59	+2	-2.3	-7.4	-17.2
14/8/12 👑	153.77	166.38	158	#84	+2	-2.3	-6.9	-18.2
15/14/9 👑	153.70	170.40	155	#85	+2	-2.4	-6.2	-19.1
15/9/13	153.70	166.22	158	#86	+2	-2.3	-7.0	-18.3
15/8/10 👑	154.62	166.38	157	#93	+2	-2.8	-7.8	-17.8
14/9/10	153.77	167.22	157	#121	-1	-2.7	-7.5	-17.9
14/9/11	153.77	167.22	157	#122	-1	-2.7	-7.5	-17.9
14/12/8 👑	153.77	169.74	155	#127	-1	-2.9	-6.6	-20.3
15/15/8 👑	153.70	171.24	154	#131	+0	-3.2	-6.9	-17.6
15/13/9	153.70	169.57	155	#136	-1	-3.0	-6.8	-20.4
15/9/11 👑	154.16	166.72	157	#142	-1	-3.1	-7.7	-19.5
15/9/9 👑	154.62	167.22	156	#166	+0	-1.4	-8.5	-20.0
14/7/13 👑	153.77	165.54	159	#169	+4	-2.7	-7.0	-21.9
15/10/10 👑	154.16	167.56	156	#175	-2	-3.5	-8.7	-21.4
15/10/11	153.70	167.06	157	#179	-1	-3.0	-7.8	-19.5
15/10/12	153.70	167.06	157	#180	-1	-3.0	-7.8	-19.5
15/8/12 👑	154.16	165.88	158	#187	+2	-3.5	-8.4	-20.4
14/6/14 👑	153.77	164.70	160	#189	+2	-2.3	-6.8	-20.0
15/13/7 👑	154.16	170.07	154	#201	+0	-5.6	-9.0	-21.1
14/13/7 👑	153.77	170.58	154	#205	+0	-3.4	-8.7	-20.0
14/8/10	153.77	166.38	157	#208	-1	-5.2	-8.1	-19.6
14/8/11	153.77	166.38	157	#209	-1	-5.2	-8.1	-19.6
14/11/9 👑	153.77	168.90	156	#212	-2	-2.9	-8.1	-21.3
15/7/13 👑	154.16	165.05	159	#214	+2	-2.8	-7.4	-22.6
15/9/12	153.70	166.22	157	#215	-1	-5.3	-8.2	-19.7
14/10/9	153.77	168.06	156	#216	-2	-3.4	-8.6	-21.0
15/8/9	154.62	166.38	156	#217	+1	-4.0	-9.1	-20.5
15/11/10	153.70	167.90	156	#218	-2	-3.4	-8.8	-21.1
15/14/8	153.70	170.40	154	#220	+0	-3.6	-8.9	-20.1
15/10/8 👑	154.62	168.06	155	#225	+2	-3.9	-10.7	-20.5
15/8/14	153.70	165.39	159	#230	+3	-2.8	-7.2	-22.6
15/11/9 👑	154.16	168.40	155	#240	-1	-6.0	-9.6	-22.3
15/12/10	153.70	168.73	156	#244	-3	-3.0	-8.2	-21.4
14/7/12	153.77	165.54	158	#259	+1	-3.8	-8.8	-22.1
15/6/14 👑	154.16	164.21	160	#262	+1	-3.3	-8.1	-21.7
14/12/7	153.77	169.74	154	#270	+0	-5.9	-9.3	-21.4
14/5/15 👑	153.77	163.86	161	#274	+0	-2.4	-10.2	-17.7
15/9/10	154.16	166.72	156	#278	-3	-4.3	-9.1	-22.2
15/13/8	153.70	169.57	154	#279	+0	-5.9	-9.5	-21.5
14/9/9	153.77	167.22	156	#283	-3	-3.8	-8.9	-21.8
15/7/10	154.62	165.54	157	#290	+1	-4.4	-9.8	-21.6
15/7/11	154.62	165.54	157	#291	+1	-4.4	-9.8	-21.6
15/7/15	153.70	164.55	160	#299	+0	-3.2	-7.9	-21.9
15/6/12 👑	154.62	164.70	158	#301	+1	-3.9	-9.5	-21.7
14/11/8	153.77	168.90	155	#307	-2	-4.1	-9.4	-22.7
14/6/13	153.77	164.70	159	#310	+1	-3.4	-8.3	-23.3
15/12/9	153.70	168.73	155	#325	-3	-4.1	-9.5	-22.8
15/7/12	154.16	165.05	158	#326	-3	-3.9	-9.0	-22.7
14/8/9	153.77	166.38	156	#327	-2	-6.4	-9.5	-22.3
… 148 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Guzzlord Slayer · atk≥153.15, hp≥154 (235 IV spreads) (−779 vs Ninetales Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 60 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Annihilape, Bellibolt, Clefable, +23 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Guzzlord (2 scenario flips).

142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Ember) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Overheat) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
144.91 Atk for Empoleon (Ember) vs Empoleon (1v2)
144.91 Atk for Empoleon (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Empoleon (1v2)
145.65 Atk for Empoleon (Overheat) vs Empoleon (1v2)
147.38 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Overheat) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
147.59 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
148.82 Atk for Snorlax (Overheat) vs Snorlax (2v2)
151.41 Atk for Snorlax (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Snorlax (2v2)
143.73 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Overheat) vs Galarian Moltres (1v0, 1v1)
146.32 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Galarian Moltres (1v0, 1v1)
153.15 Atk for Guzzlord (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Guzzlord (2v0)
143.20 Atk for Skeledirge (Overheat) vs Skeledirge (1v1, 2v1)
145.44 Atk for Skeledirge (Ember) vs Skeledirge (1v1, 2v1)
145.44 Atk for Skeledirge (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Skeledirge (1v1, 2v1)
142.54 Atk for Dusknoir (Ember) vs Dusknoir (0v0, 2v2)
142.54 Atk for Dusknoir (Overheat) vs Dusknoir (0v0, 2v2)
142.54 Atk for Dusknoir (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Dusknoir (0v0, 2v2)
151.31 Atk for Ninetales (Overheat) vs Ninetales (2v2)
152.21 Atk for Ninetales (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Ninetales (2v2)
146.11 Atk for Cresselia (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Cresselia (0v2, 1v2)
147.13 Atk for Cresselia (Overheat) vs Cresselia (0v2, 1v2)
144.65 Atk for Clefable (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Clefable (1v2)
144.89 Atk for Clefable (Overheat) vs Clefable (1v2)
144.26 Atk for Talonflame (Overheat) vs Talonflame (1v0, 2v1)
146.51 Atk for Talonflame (Ember) vs Talonflame (1v0, 2v1)
146.51 Atk for Talonflame (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Talonflame (1v0, 2v1)
142.08 Atk for Walrein (Ember) vs Walrein (2v1, 2v2)
142.08 Atk for Walrein (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
142.80 Atk for Walrein (Overheat) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
142.08 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Overheat) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
142.08 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
144.01 Atk for Runerigus (Overheat) vs Runerigus (2v1)
147.10 Atk for Runerigus (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Runerigus (2v1)
143.87 Atk for Steelix (Overheat) vs Steelix (1v2)
146.32 Atk for Steelix (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Steelix (1v2)
143.92 Atk for Seaking (Overheat) vs Seaking (1v0)
144.27 Atk for Seaking (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Seaking (1v0)
148.87 Atk for Toucannon (Overheat) vs Toucannon (0v0)
149.28 Atk for Toucannon (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Toucannon (0v0)
147.52 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Ember) vs Shadow Milotic (2v0)
147.52 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Milotic (2v0)
147.52 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Overheat) vs Shadow Milotic (2v0)
143.82 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Overheat) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 1v2, 2v2)
143.82 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 1v2, 2v2)
150.27 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Overheat) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v1)
150.58 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v1)
146.78 Atk for Bellibolt (Overheat) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
148.41 Atk for Bellibolt (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
150.80 Atk for Annihilape (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Annihilape (2v2)
151.25 Atk for Annihilape (Overheat) vs Annihilape (2v2)
142.80 Atk for Florges (Overheat) vs Florges (2v1)
143.34 Atk for Lapras (Overheat) vs Lapras (1v0)
144.08 Atk for Lapras (Ember) vs Lapras (1v0)
144.08 Atk for Lapras (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Lapras (1v0)
142.85 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Overheat) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
144.08 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
147.27 Atk for Ampharos (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Ampharos (1v2)
148.17 Atk for Ampharos (Overheat) vs Ampharos (1v2)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

142.85 Atk + 151 HP flips Shadow Cresselia (0v1) [3120 IVs]
142.85 Atk + 153 HP flips Melmetal (1v2) [2399 IVs]
142.85 Atk + 153 HP flips Mimikyu (2v2) [2399 IVs]
142.85 Atk + 150 HP flips Shadow Ampharos (0v1) [3360 IVs]
142.85 Atk + 153 HP flips Deoxys (Defense) (0v0) [2399 IVs]
142.85 Atk + 152 HP flips Melmetal (1v2) [2879 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Cramorant (2v0)
vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)

Member IVs (235)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/10/10 👑	153.77	168.06	157	#56	+2	-2.2	-7.3	-17.1
15/11/11	153.70	167.90	157	#59	+2	-2.3	-7.4	-17.2
15/11/14 👑	153.24	167.39	159	#61	+0	-0.7	-7.2	-13.1
15/12/13 👑	153.24	168.23	158	#65	-1	-1.6	-8.2	-15.4
14/10/12 👑	153.32	167.56	158	#72	-1	-1.8	-8.6	-15.8
14/8/12 👑	153.77	166.38	158	#84	+2	-2.3	-6.9	-18.2
15/14/9 👑	153.70	170.40	155	#85	+2	-2.4	-6.2	-19.1
15/9/13	153.70	166.22	158	#86	+2	-2.3	-7.0	-18.3
15/8/10 👑	154.62	166.38	157	#93	+2	-2.8	-7.8	-17.8
14/9/13 👑	153.32	166.72	159	#102	-1	-1.5	-7.5	-16.4
15/14/11 👑	153.24	169.89	156	#107	-1	-2.5	-7.8	-14.8
15/10/14	153.24	166.56	159	#112	-1	-1.6	-7.7	-16.5
15/10/15	153.24	166.56	159	#113	-1	-1.6	-7.7	-16.5
15/11/13	153.24	167.39	158	#116	-2	-1.9	-8.6	-16.1
14/9/10	153.77	167.22	157	#121	-1	-2.7	-7.5	-17.9
14/9/11	153.77	167.22	157	#122	-1	-2.7	-7.5	-17.9
14/12/8 👑	153.77	169.74	155	#127	-1	-2.9	-6.6	-20.3
15/15/8 👑	153.70	171.24	154	#131	+0	-3.2	-6.9	-17.6
14/15/7 👑	153.32	171.75	154	#132	+0	-3.6	-6.9	-12.1
15/13/9	153.70	169.57	155	#136	-1	-3.0	-6.8	-20.4
15/13/12 👑	153.24	169.06	157	#137	-1	-2.3	-8.9	-15.5
14/11/11 👑	153.32	168.40	157	#140	+0	-2.9	-9.6	-16.7
15/9/11 👑	154.16	166.72	157	#142	-1	-3.1	-7.7	-19.5
15/12/12	153.24	168.23	157	#152	-2	-3.1	-9.7	-16.7
14/10/11	153.32	167.56	157	#162	-2	-3.3	-10.1	-17.0
15/9/9 👑	154.62	167.22	156	#166	+0	-1.4	-8.5	-20.0
14/7/13 👑	153.77	165.54	159	#169	+4	-2.7	-7.0	-21.9
15/15/10 👑	153.24	170.72	155	#170	-1	-3.2	-8.7	-16.5
14/9/12	153.32	166.72	158	#174	-2	-2.9	-9.0	-17.8
15/10/10 👑	154.16	167.56	156	#175	-2	-3.5	-8.7	-21.4
14/8/14 👑	153.32	165.88	160	#177	+1	-1.7	-8.1	-15.6
15/10/11	153.70	167.06	157	#179	-1	-3.0	-7.8	-19.5
15/10/12	153.70	167.06	157	#180	-1	-3.0	-7.8	-19.5
15/10/13	153.24	166.56	158	#182	-2	-3.0	-9.2	-17.9
15/8/12 👑	154.16	165.88	158	#187	+2	-3.5	-8.4	-20.4
14/6/14 👑	153.77	164.70	160	#189	+2	-2.3	-6.8	-20.0
15/13/7 👑	154.16	170.07	154	#201	+0	-5.6	-9.0	-21.1
14/13/7 👑	153.77	170.58	154	#205	+0	-3.4	-8.7	-20.0
14/8/10	153.77	166.38	157	#208	-1	-5.2	-8.1	-19.6
14/8/11	153.77	166.38	157	#209	-1	-5.2	-8.1	-19.6
14/11/9 👑	153.77	168.90	156	#212	-2	-2.9	-8.1	-21.3
15/7/13 👑	154.16	165.05	159	#214	+2	-2.8	-7.4	-22.6
15/9/12	153.70	166.22	157	#215	-1	-5.3	-8.2	-19.7
14/10/9	153.77	168.06	156	#216	-2	-3.4	-8.6	-21.0
15/8/9	154.62	166.38	156	#217	+1	-4.0	-9.1	-20.5
15/11/10	153.70	167.90	156	#218	-2	-3.4	-8.8	-21.1
15/14/8	153.70	170.40	154	#220	+0	-3.6	-8.9	-20.1
15/10/8 👑	154.62	168.06	155	#225	+2	-3.9	-10.7	-20.5
15/8/14	153.70	165.39	159	#230	+3	-2.8	-7.2	-22.6
14/13/9	153.32	170.07	155	#231	-4	-3.5	-9.0	-19.7
… 185 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Dusknoir (Shadow) Bulk · def≥169.14 (995 IV spreads)

Clears 142 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Annihilape, Shadow Corviknight, +20 more. Bulkpoint(s) vs Dusknoir (Shadow) (18 scenario flips).

160.04 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
160.21 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
161.16 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
161.24 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Outrage) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
161.76 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Superpower) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
162.71 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Lick) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
162.71 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Psywave) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
162.71 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
163.64 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2)
159.80 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Payback) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v2)
161.26 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Sky Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v2)
161.26 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Air Cutter) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v2)
163.18 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v2)
165.86 Def + 155 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Air Slash) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v2)
160.00 Def + 151 HP for Melmetal (Flash Cannon) vs Melmetal (1v2)
160.44 Def + 153 HP for Melmetal (Double Iron Bash) vs Melmetal (1v2)
160.93 Def + 151 HP for Melmetal (Hyper Beam) vs Melmetal (1v2)
161.36 Def + 151 HP for Melmetal (Rock Slide) vs Melmetal (1v2)
161.74 Def + 152 HP for Melmetal (Superpower) vs Melmetal (1v2)
162.08 Def + 152 HP for Melmetal (Thunderbolt) vs Melmetal (1v2)
162.08 Def + 152 HP for Melmetal (Dynamic Punch) vs Melmetal (1v2)
162.52 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
162.54 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
162.83 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
163.05 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
163.75 Def + 159 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
165.79 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Steel Wing) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
166.74 Def + 159 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Shadow Empoleon (1v2)
161.03 Def + 153 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (2v2)
162.15 Def + 153 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (2v2)
162.91 Def + 153 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (2v2)
165.72 Def + 160 HP for Snorlax (Outrage) vs Snorlax (1v0)
165.90 Def + 161 HP for Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (1v0)
166.03 Def + 161 HP for Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Snorlax (1v0)
166.88 Def + 160 HP for Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Snorlax (1v0)
167.03 Def + 160 HP for Snorlax (Superpower) vs Snorlax (1v0)
167.87 Def + 161 HP for Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Snorlax (1v0)
159.78 Def + 152 HP for Florges (Psychic) vs Florges (1v1)
160.09 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (1v1)
160.21 Def + 152 HP for Florges (Chilling Water) vs Florges (1v1)
160.92 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v1)
162.71 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Trailblaze) vs Florges (1v1)
164.27 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (1v1)
161.93 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
162.37 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
162.59 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
162.72 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
165.98 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Scratch) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
165.98 Def + 149 HP for Rillaboom (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (0v1, 1v2)
159.83 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (2v1)
159.96 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (2v1)
160.43 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Blizzard) vs Lapras (2v1)
160.78 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Surf) vs Lapras (2v1)
161.17 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (2v1)
161.74 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (2v1)
163.29 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (2v1)
167.21 Def + 153 HP for Lapras (Water Gun) vs Lapras (2v1)
159.83 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
160.03 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
160.10 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
160.32 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
160.52 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
161.37 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
162.17 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0, 1v1)
159.69 Def + 153 HP for Ninetales (Overheat) vs Ninetales (1v1)
159.98 Def + 154 HP for Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Ninetales (1v1)
161.23 Def + 154 HP for Ninetales (Fire Blast) vs Ninetales (1v1)
161.27 Def + 154 HP for Ninetales (Scorching Sands) vs Ninetales (1v1)
161.63 Def + 154 HP for Ninetales (Solar Beam) vs Ninetales (1v1)
161.79 Def + 155 HP for Ninetales (Flamethrower) vs Ninetales (1v1)
162.15 Def + 158 HP for Ninetales (Fire Spin) vs Ninetales (1v1)
162.58 Def + 154 HP for Ninetales (Heat Wave) vs Ninetales (1v1)
163.79 Def + 156 HP for Ninetales (Energy Ball) vs Ninetales (1v1)
163.79 Def + 156 HP for Ninetales (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Ninetales (1v1)
160.10 Def for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (0v1)
160.87 Def + 149 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (0v1)
160.87 Def + 149 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (0v1)
161.38 Def for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (0v1)
163.80 Def for Alolan Muk (Poison Jab) vs Alolan Muk (0v1)
160.07 Def + 150 HP for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (1v0, 1v1)
160.07 Def + 150 HP for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (1v0, 1v1)
160.60 Def + 152 HP for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (1v1)
161.31 Def + 152 HP for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (1v1)
159.91 Def + 153 HP for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v1)
161.26 Def + 153 HP for Deoxys Defense (Rock Slide) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v1)
162.12 Def + 154 HP for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v1)
162.55 Def + 153 HP for Deoxys Defense (Zen Headbutt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v1)
160.96 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
162.13 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
162.13 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v1)
160.73 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Steelix (Crunch) vs Shadow Steelix (0v2)
161.34 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Steelix (Earthquake) vs Shadow Steelix (0v2)
161.99 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Steelix (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Steelix (0v2)
164.56 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Steelix (Psychic Fangs) vs Shadow Steelix (0v2)
164.56 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Steelix (Breaking Swipe) vs Shadow Steelix (0v2)
160.14 Def for Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (1v1)
160.83 Def for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (1v1)
160.98 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (1v1, 1v2)
161.26 Def for Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (1v1)
161.66 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos (Thunder) vs Ampharos (1v1, 1v2)
162.35 Def for Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Ampharos (1v1)
162.55 Def for Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Ampharos (1v1)
162.60 Def for Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Ampharos (1v1)
163.04 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Ampharos (1v2)
161.66 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
162.49 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
162.49 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
162.91 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
164.19 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Acid) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
164.19 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (1v0)
160.76 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
160.83 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
160.98 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
161.32 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
161.32 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
161.89 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
162.14 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
163.36 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
165.05 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1)
160.60 Def + 159 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Flame Charge) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
161.40 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
162.01 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Hurricane) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
162.28 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Fire Blast) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
162.41 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Fly) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
160.08 Def + 157 HP for Annihilape (Low Sweep) vs Annihilape (2v2)
161.11 Def + 156 HP for Annihilape (Close Combat) vs Annihilape (2v2)
161.53 Def + 156 HP for Annihilape (Ice Punch) vs Annihilape (2v2)
161.53 Def + 156 HP for Annihilape (Night Slash) vs Annihilape (2v2)
161.82 Def + 156 HP for Annihilape (Shadow Ball) vs Annihilape (2v2)
162.46 Def + 156 HP for Annihilape (Rage Fist) vs Annihilape (2v2)
165.41 Def + 157 HP for Annihilape (Counter) vs Annihilape (2v2)
162.22 Def + 158 HP for Miltank (Stomp) vs Miltank (2v1)
162.52 Def + 158 HP for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (2v1)
162.73 Def + 158 HP for Miltank (High Horsepower) vs Miltank (2v1)
163.86 Def + 161 HP for Miltank (Gyro Ball) vs Miltank (2v1)
164.33 Def + 158 HP for Miltank (Body Slam) vs Miltank (2v1)
165.17 Def + 159 HP for Miltank (Rollout) vs Miltank (2v1)
165.91 Def + 158 HP for Miltank (Ice Beam) vs Miltank (2v1)
169.14 Def + 155 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
167.52 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
167.52 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
167.74 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

167.39 Def flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v2) [1526 IVs]
164.21 Def flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v2) [2559 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v2)

Member IVs (995)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
9/15/15 👑	149.57	172.26	161	#1	+3	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
9/15/14	149.57	172.26	160	#2	+0	-1.0	-3.7	+0.3
11/15/14 👑	150.80	171.75	160	#3	+5	-0.7	-9.2	-0.1
10/15/13 👑	150.41	172.26	159	#4	+5	-1.0	-7.3	-1.0
8/15/15	148.73	172.26	161	#5	+0	-3.6	-4.1	-6.0
9/14/15	149.57	171.42	161	#6	-2	-1.6	-9.3	-3.9
10/13/15 👑	150.41	170.58	161	#7	+3	-1.0	-9.4	-2.2
9/15/13	149.57	172.26	159	#8	+0	-2.3	-7.7	-3.5
10/15/14	149.97	171.75	160	#9	+0	-1.9	-7.9	-2.7
10/15/15	149.97	171.75	160	#10	+0	-1.9	-7.9	-2.7
11/14/14	150.80	170.91	160	#11	+3	-1.4	-15.5	-3.6
11/14/15	150.80	170.91	160	#12	+3	-1.4	-15.5	-3.6
11/15/10 👑	151.25	172.26	157	#13	-4	-4.0	-10.3	-3.0
11/15/11 👑	151.25	172.26	157	#14	-4	-4.0	-10.3	-3.0
10/14/14	150.41	171.42	160	#15	+1	-1.4	-13.4	-3.4
11/15/15	150.35	171.24	160	#16	+0	-1.6	-13.6	-3.5
10/15/12	150.41	172.26	158	#17	-1	-2.5	-7.5	-4.5
12/15/12 👑	151.64	171.75	158	#18	+2	-2.3	-6.6	-2.3
13/15/14 👑	151.57	170.72	159	#19	+2	-1.8	-6.0	-3.9
11/15/13	150.80	171.75	159	#20	+3	-1.9	-16.0	-2.7
12/14/15 👑	151.19	170.40	160	#21	+3	-2.0	-15.7	-3.8
12/15/14 👑	151.19	171.24	159	#22	+0	-2.8	-10.7	-2.7
8/15/14	148.73	172.26	160	#23	+0	-4.6	-7.7	-5.8
9/13/15	149.57	170.58	161	#24	+0	-2.4	-9.8	-4.7
11/13/13	151.25	170.58	159	#25	-1	-1.8	-10.0	-4.6
10/12/15	150.41	169.74	161	#26	-1	-6.1	-9.9	-3.3
12/15/9 👑	152.09	172.26	156	#27	-1	-3.8	-7.7	-8.2
12/15/11	151.64	171.75	157	#28	+0	-5.6	-5.7	-4.6
9/14/14	149.57	171.42	160	#29	+0	-2.7	-13.8	-5.9
10/13/14	150.41	170.58	160	#30	+1	-2.1	-14.0	-7.1
10/15/10	150.41	172.26	157	#31	-5	-5.7	-9.0	-6.7
10/15/11	150.41	172.26	157	#32	-5	-5.7	-9.0	-6.7
11/14/13	150.80	170.91	159	#33	-1	-3.0	-10.0	-6.3
12/14/12	151.64	170.91	158	#34	-1	-4.7	-7.4	-4.7
10/14/15	149.97	170.91	160	#35	+0	-2.6	-14.1	-6.3
14/14/11 👑	152.86	170.40	157	#36	+0	+1.2	-8.3	-9.3
7/15/15	147.89	172.26	161	#37	+0	-8.5	-5.6	-6.9
12/14/14	151.19	170.40	159	#38	-2	-3.3	-10.3	-5.0
9/15/12	149.57	172.26	158	#39	+0	-3.8	-7.9	-7.0
10/14/13	150.41	171.42	159	#41	-1	-2.6	-11.0	-6.0
13/15/15	151.11	170.21	159	#42	-3	-3.3	-10.3	-5.0
14/15/12 👑	152.40	170.72	157	#43	+0	+0.9	-10.1	-7.9
13/15/7 👑	152.93	172.26	154	#44	+0	-2.6	-7.8	-10.3
12/13/13 👑	151.64	170.07	159	#45	-1	-6.8	-6.7	-6.4
11/15/12	150.80	171.75	158	#46	-2	-3.5	-10.7	-6.2
12/15/15	150.74	170.72	159	#48	-1	-3.0	-10.1	-7.8
13/14/14	151.57	169.89	159	#49	-3	-6.8	-6.7	-6.4
13/14/15	151.57	169.89	159	#50	-3	-6.8	-6.7	-6.4
13/12/10 👑	152.93	169.74	157	#51	-3	-1.4	-8.2	-9.6
13/15/13	151.57	170.72	158	#52	-2	-4.9	-7.5	-6.2
… 945 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Ninetales Atk · atk≥151.31 (1014 IV spreads)

Clears 57 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Annihilape, Bellibolt, Clefable, +22 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Ninetales (3 scenario flips).

142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Ember) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Overheat) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
144.91 Atk for Empoleon (Ember) vs Empoleon (1v2)
144.91 Atk for Empoleon (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Empoleon (1v2)
145.65 Atk for Empoleon (Overheat) vs Empoleon (1v2)
147.38 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Overheat) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
147.59 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
148.82 Atk for Snorlax (Overheat) vs Snorlax (2v2)
143.73 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Overheat) vs Galarian Moltres (1v0, 1v1)
146.32 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Galarian Moltres (1v0, 1v1)
143.20 Atk for Skeledirge (Overheat) vs Skeledirge (1v1, 2v1)
145.44 Atk for Skeledirge (Ember) vs Skeledirge (1v1, 2v1)
145.44 Atk for Skeledirge (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Skeledirge (1v1, 2v1)
142.54 Atk for Dusknoir (Ember) vs Dusknoir (0v0, 2v2)
142.54 Atk for Dusknoir (Overheat) vs Dusknoir (0v0, 2v2)
142.54 Atk for Dusknoir (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Dusknoir (0v0, 2v2)
151.31 Atk for Ninetales (Overheat) vs Ninetales (2v2)
146.11 Atk for Cresselia (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Cresselia (0v2, 1v2)
147.13 Atk for Cresselia (Overheat) vs Cresselia (0v2, 1v2)
144.65 Atk for Clefable (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Clefable (1v2)
144.89 Atk for Clefable (Overheat) vs Clefable (1v2)
144.26 Atk for Talonflame (Overheat) vs Talonflame (1v0, 2v1)
146.51 Atk for Talonflame (Ember) vs Talonflame (1v0, 2v1)
146.51 Atk for Talonflame (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Talonflame (1v0, 2v1)
142.08 Atk for Walrein (Ember) vs Walrein (2v1, 2v2)
142.08 Atk for Walrein (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
142.80 Atk for Walrein (Overheat) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
142.08 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Overheat) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
142.08 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
144.01 Atk for Runerigus (Overheat) vs Runerigus (2v1)
147.10 Atk for Runerigus (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Runerigus (2v1)
143.87 Atk for Steelix (Overheat) vs Steelix (1v2)
146.32 Atk for Steelix (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Steelix (1v2)
143.92 Atk for Seaking (Overheat) vs Seaking (1v0)
144.27 Atk for Seaking (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Seaking (1v0)
148.87 Atk for Toucannon (Overheat) vs Toucannon (0v0)
149.28 Atk for Toucannon (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Toucannon (0v0)
147.52 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Ember) vs Shadow Milotic (2v0)
147.52 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Milotic (2v0)
147.52 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Overheat) vs Shadow Milotic (2v0)
143.82 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Overheat) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 1v2, 2v2)
143.82 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Malamar (1v2, 2v2)
150.27 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Overheat) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v1)
150.58 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v1)
146.78 Atk for Bellibolt (Overheat) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
148.41 Atk for Bellibolt (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
150.80 Atk for Annihilape (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Annihilape (2v2)
151.25 Atk for Annihilape (Overheat) vs Annihilape (2v2)
142.80 Atk for Florges (Overheat) vs Florges (2v1)
143.34 Atk for Lapras (Overheat) vs Lapras (1v0)
144.08 Atk for Lapras (Ember) vs Lapras (1v0)
144.08 Atk for Lapras (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Lapras (1v0)
142.85 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Overheat) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
144.08 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
147.27 Atk for Ampharos (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Ampharos (1v2)
148.17 Atk for Ampharos (Overheat) vs Ampharos (1v2)

Member IVs (1014)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
12/15/12 👑	151.64	171.75	158	#18	+2	-2.3	-6.6	-2.3
13/15/14 👑	151.57	170.72	159	#19	+2	-1.8	-6.0	-3.9
12/15/9 👑	152.09	172.26	156	#27	-1	-3.8	-7.7	-8.2
12/15/11	151.64	171.75	157	#28	+0	-5.6	-5.7	-4.6
12/14/12	151.64	170.91	158	#34	-1	-4.7	-7.4	-4.7
14/14/11 👑	152.86	170.40	157	#36	+0	+1.2	-8.3	-9.3
13/10/14 👑	152.48	167.56	160	#40	+0	-0.4	-6.8	-11.4
14/15/12 👑	152.40	170.72	157	#43	+0	+0.9	-10.1	-7.9
13/15/7 👑	152.93	172.26	154	#44	+0	-2.6	-7.8	-10.3
12/13/13 👑	151.64	170.07	159	#45	-1	-6.8	-6.7	-6.4
13/14/14	151.57	169.89	159	#49	-3	-6.8	-6.7	-6.4
13/14/15	151.57	169.89	159	#50	-3	-6.8	-6.7	-6.4
13/12/10 👑	152.93	169.74	157	#51	-3	-1.4	-8.2	-9.6
13/15/13	151.57	170.72	158	#52	-2	-4.9	-7.5	-6.2
13/13/14 👑	152.02	169.57	159	#53	-3	-6.8	-6.8	-6.5
12/14/10 👑	152.09	171.42	157	#54	+0	-4.4	-8.0	-6.3
13/14/13 👑	152.02	170.40	158	#55	+1	-4.8	-7.5	-8.6
14/10/10 👑	153.77	168.06	157	#56	+2	-2.2	-7.3	-17.1
14/14/13 👑	152.40	169.89	158	#57	+0	-0.9	-7.7	-9.2
14/15/14	151.94	170.21	158	#58	+0	-5.0	-7.5	-8.6
15/11/11	153.70	167.90	157	#59	+2	-2.3	-7.4	-17.2
15/11/14 👑	153.24	167.39	159	#61	+0	-0.7	-7.2	-13.1
13/11/15	152.02	167.90	160	#63	-3	-7.2	-6.9	-10.5
15/12/13 👑	153.24	168.23	158	#65	-1	-1.6	-8.2	-15.4
13/13/9 👑	152.93	170.58	156	#66	+0	+0.7	-7.5	-13.8
13/8/14 👑	152.93	166.38	160	#67	-1	-0.7	-4.9	-13.5
12/10/14 👑	152.09	168.06	160	#68	-3	-6.1	-6.8	-10.4
12/9/15 👑	152.09	167.22	161	#69	-1	-5.6	-8.0	-9.9
13/15/11	152.02	171.24	157	#70	-1	-5.6	-10.0	-6.4
13/15/12	152.02	171.24	157	#71	-1	-5.6	-10.0	-6.4
14/10/12 👑	153.32	167.56	158	#72	-1	-1.8	-8.6	-15.8
12/11/14	151.64	168.40	160	#75	-4	-7.3	-6.8	-10.5
12/11/15	151.64	168.40	160	#76	-4	-7.3	-6.8	-10.5
14/15/10 👑	152.86	171.24	156	#77	+0	+0.5	-7.4	-12.0
15/15/14	152.32	169.70	158	#79	-3	-1.1	-8.0	-9.5
12/15/8	152.09	172.26	155	#82	-1	-5.1	-9.3	-9.8
14/8/12 👑	153.77	166.38	158	#84	+2	-2.3	-6.9	-18.2
15/14/9 👑	153.70	170.40	155	#85	+2	-2.4	-6.2	-19.1
15/9/13	153.70	166.22	158	#86	+2	-2.3	-7.0	-18.3
13/12/15 👑	152.02	168.73	160	#87	-2	-6.8	-6.3	-10.6
14/13/14 👑	152.40	169.06	159	#88	-2	-0.8	-7.3	-12.4
13/10/12	152.93	168.06	158	#89	-4	-1.9	-8.6	-15.6
13/9/13	152.93	167.22	159	#90	-2	-1.1	-7.4	-13.2
12/12/14 👑	151.64	169.24	160	#91	-4	-6.7	-8.4	-10.4
15/8/10 👑	154.62	166.38	157	#93	+2	-2.8	-7.8	-17.8
14/13/11	152.86	169.57	157	#99	-4	-2.0	-9.0	-10.6
15/12/15 👑	152.78	167.72	159	#101	-2	-1.3	-8.0	-13.8
14/9/13 👑	153.32	166.72	159	#102	-1	-1.5	-7.5	-16.4
13/11/13 👑	152.48	168.40	159	#103	-2	-1.3	-7.9	-14.3
13/13/11	152.48	170.07	157	#104	-3	-2.0	-10.6	-11.1
… 964 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

General · atk≥142.07, def≥159.69 (3600 IV spreads)

Clears 4 anchors across 2 shield scenarios, covering Ninetales, Tinkaton. Floor across 28 atk breakpoint opponents + 24 bulkpoint opponents. Clears the easiest anchor for every opponent.

142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Ember) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Overheat) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
142.07 Atk for Tinkaton (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Tinkaton (0v1)
159.69 Def + 158 HP for Ninetales bulk (Overheat) vs Ninetales (1v1)

Member IVs (3600)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
9/15/15 👑	149.57	172.26	161	#1	+3	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
9/15/14	149.57	172.26	160	#2	+0	-1.0	-3.7	+0.3
11/15/14 👑	150.80	171.75	160	#3	+5	-0.7	-9.2	-0.1
10/15/13 👑	150.41	172.26	159	#4	+5	-1.0	-7.3	-1.0
8/15/15	148.73	172.26	161	#5	+0	-3.6	-4.1	-6.0
9/14/15	149.57	171.42	161	#6	-2	-1.6	-9.3	-3.9
10/13/15 👑	150.41	170.58	161	#7	+3	-1.0	-9.4	-2.2
9/15/13	149.57	172.26	159	#8	+0	-2.3	-7.7	-3.5
10/15/14	149.97	171.75	160	#9	+0	-1.9	-7.9	-2.7
10/15/15	149.97	171.75	160	#10	+0	-1.9	-7.9	-2.7
11/14/14	150.80	170.91	160	#11	+3	-1.4	-15.5	-3.6
11/14/15	150.80	170.91	160	#12	+3	-1.4	-15.5	-3.6
11/15/10 👑	151.25	172.26	157	#13	-4	-4.0	-10.3	-3.0
11/15/11 👑	151.25	172.26	157	#14	-4	-4.0	-10.3	-3.0
10/14/14	150.41	171.42	160	#15	+1	-1.4	-13.4	-3.4
11/15/15	150.35	171.24	160	#16	+0	-1.6	-13.6	-3.5
10/15/12	150.41	172.26	158	#17	-1	-2.5	-7.5	-4.5
12/15/12 👑	151.64	171.75	158	#18	+2	-2.3	-6.6	-2.3
13/15/14 👑	151.57	170.72	159	#19	+2	-1.8	-6.0	-3.9
11/15/13	150.80	171.75	159	#20	+3	-1.9	-16.0	-2.7
12/14/15 👑	151.19	170.40	160	#21	+3	-2.0	-15.7	-3.8
12/15/14 👑	151.19	171.24	159	#22	+0	-2.8	-10.7	-2.7
8/15/14	148.73	172.26	160	#23	+0	-4.6	-7.7	-5.8
9/13/15	149.57	170.58	161	#24	+0	-2.4	-9.8	-4.7
11/13/13	151.25	170.58	159	#25	-1	-1.8	-10.0	-4.6
10/12/15	150.41	169.74	161	#26	-1	-6.1	-9.9	-3.3
12/15/9 👑	152.09	172.26	156	#27	-1	-3.8	-7.7	-8.2
12/15/11	151.64	171.75	157	#28	+0	-5.6	-5.7	-4.6
9/14/14	149.57	171.42	160	#29	+0	-2.7	-13.8	-5.9
10/13/14	150.41	170.58	160	#30	+1	-2.1	-14.0	-7.1
10/15/10	150.41	172.26	157	#31	-5	-5.7	-9.0	-6.7
10/15/11	150.41	172.26	157	#32	-5	-5.7	-9.0	-6.7
11/14/13	150.80	170.91	159	#33	-1	-3.0	-10.0	-6.3
12/14/12	151.64	170.91	158	#34	-1	-4.7	-7.4	-4.7
10/14/15	149.97	170.91	160	#35	+0	-2.6	-14.1	-6.3
14/14/11 👑	152.86	170.40	157	#36	+0	+1.2	-8.3	-9.3
7/15/15	147.89	172.26	161	#37	+0	-8.5	-5.6	-6.9
12/14/14	151.19	170.40	159	#38	-2	-3.3	-10.3	-5.0
9/15/12	149.57	172.26	158	#39	+0	-3.8	-7.9	-7.0
13/10/14 👑	152.48	167.56	160	#40	+0	-0.4	-6.8	-11.4
10/14/13	150.41	171.42	159	#41	-1	-2.6	-11.0	-6.0
13/15/15	151.11	170.21	159	#42	-3	-3.3	-10.3	-5.0
14/15/12 👑	152.40	170.72	157	#43	+0	+0.9	-10.1	-7.9
13/15/7 👑	152.93	172.26	154	#44	+0	-2.6	-7.8	-10.3
12/13/13 👑	151.64	170.07	159	#45	-1	-6.8	-6.7	-6.4
11/15/12	150.80	171.75	158	#46	-2	-3.5	-10.7	-6.2
11/11/15 👑	151.25	168.90	161	#47	+0	-5.7	-10.5	-8.4
12/15/15	150.74	170.72	159	#48	-1	-3.0	-10.1	-7.8
13/14/14	151.57	169.89	159	#49	-3	-6.8	-6.7	-6.4
13/14/15	151.57	169.89	159	#50	-3	-6.8	-6.7	-6.4
… 3550 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Per-matchup IV finder (100 specific matchups - e.g. "which IV beats a given opponent in a given shield?")

Collapsed by default. This is a per-(opponent, shield) lookup: each card is one matchup and the exact IV spreads that win it. For "what do I need vs threat X" use Threats where your build choice matters above, or paste your collection into the scatter. Composite cards (slayer ∩ tier) surface IVs that satisfy a slayer anchor and a stat-cutoff tier; pure slayer-archetype cards live in the Slayer Builds block below, pure tier cards in the Threshold Tiers above.

Show only notable categories (≤ 5% of cohort or ≤ 5 members). Uncheck to see every non-trivial intersection.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Dusknoir (Shadow) Bulk (2 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Dusknoir (Shadow) Bulk · def≥169.137

15/14/4 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 171.42, hp 152, SP #342

One of 2 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Dusknoir (Shadow) Bulk threshold (def≥169.137). Trades mirror dominance (90/104 wins, vs 104/104 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Dusknoir (Shadow) Bulk cutoff.

15/15/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 172.26, hp 151, SP #381

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Fortified Dusknoir (4 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Fortified Dusknoir · def≥171.75, hp≥156

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +0.7, spread 0.3)

12/15/12 👑 slight atk weight - atk 151.64, def 171.75, hp 158, SP #17

One of 4 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Dusknoir threshold (def≥171.75, hp≥156). Trades mirror dominance (114/138 wins, vs 138/138 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Fortified Dusknoir cutoff.

12/15/9 👑 slight atk weight - atk 152.09, def 172.26, hp 156, SP #67

One of 4 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Dusknoir threshold (def≥171.75, hp≥156). Trades mirror dominance (97/138 wins, vs 138/138 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Fortified Dusknoir cutoff.

12/15/11 slight atk weight - atk 151.64, def 171.75, hp 157, SP #62

One of 4 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Dusknoir threshold (def≥171.75, hp≥156). Trades mirror dominance (95/138 wins, vs 138/138 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Fortified Dusknoir cutoff.

12/15/10 slight atk weight - atk 151.64, def 171.75, hp 156, SP #154

One of 4 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Dusknoir threshold (def≥171.75, hp≥156). Trades mirror dominance (93/138 wins, vs 138/138 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Fortified Dusknoir cutoff.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Cramorant Slayer (18 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Cramorant Slayer · atk≥153.409, hp≥154

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +1.7, spread 1.0)

15/2/15 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 161.34, hp 161, SP #411

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Cramorant Slayer threshold (atk≥153.409, hp≥154). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (104/104) AND clears the Cramorant Slayer cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/4/13 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 163.02, hp 159, SP #460

15/4/14 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 163.02, hp 160, SP #317

15/5/13 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 163.86, hp 159, SP #345

15/6/12 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 164.70, hp 158, SP #375

15/8/10 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 166.38, hp 157, SP #277

15/10/8 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 168.06, hp 155, SP #351

15/0/15 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 159.66, hp 161, SP #637

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Cramorant Slayer threshold (atk≥153.409, hp≥154). Trades mirror dominance (90/104 wins, vs 104/104 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Cramorant Slayer cutoff.

15/1/15 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 160.50, hp 161, SP #524

15/6/10 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 164.70, hp 157, SP #510

15/6/11 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 164.70, hp 157, SP #509

15/7/9 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 165.54, hp 156, SP #538

15/7/10 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 165.54, hp 157, SP #400

15/7/11 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 165.54, hp 157, SP #399

15/8/8 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 166.38, hp 155, SP #566

15/8/9 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 166.38, hp 156, SP #430

15/9/8 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 167.22, hp 155, SP #461

15/9/9 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 167.22, hp 156, SP #308

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Guzzlord Slayer (18 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Guzzlord Slayer · atk≥153.152, hp≥154

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +1.7, spread 1.0)

15/2/15 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 161.34, hp 161, SP #411

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Guzzlord Slayer threshold (atk≥153.152, hp≥154). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (104/104) AND clears the Guzzlord Slayer cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/4/13 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 163.02, hp 159, SP #460

15/4/14 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 163.02, hp 160, SP #317

15/5/13 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 163.86, hp 159, SP #345

15/6/12 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 164.70, hp 158, SP #375

15/8/10 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 166.38, hp 157, SP #277

15/10/8 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 168.06, hp 155, SP #351

15/0/15 heavy atk weight - atk 154.62, def 159.66, hp 161, SP #637

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Guzzlord Slayer threshold (atk≥153.152, hp≥154). Trades mirror dominance (90/104 wins, vs 104/104 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Guzzlord Slayer cutoff.