Regidrago Ultra League IV Dive

Opponent list (63 mons)

Tinkaton, Corviknight, Snorlax (Shadow), Corviknight (Shadow), Melmetal, Virizion, Zygarde (Complete Forme), Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow), Mimikyu, Snorlax, Florges, Moltres (Galarian), Feraligatr (Shadow), Feraligatr, Jellicent, Giratina (Altered), Cramorant, Guzzlord, Skeledirge, Rillaboom, Lapras, Lapras (Shadow), Dusknoir, Ninetales (Alolan), Dondozo, Dusknoir (Shadow), Registeel, Blastoise, Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), Forretress, Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), Regidrago, Ninetales, Cresselia, Muk (Alolan), Clefable, Talonflame, Forretress (Shadow), Walrein, Walrein (Shadow), Deoxys (Defense), Runerigus, Steelix, Seaking, Cresselia (Shadow), Steelix (Shadow), Swampert, Toucannon, Milotic (Shadow), Primarina, Ampharos, Cradily (Shadow), Malamar (Shadow), Ampharos (Shadow), Talonflame (Shadow), Bellibolt, Seismitoad, Annihilape, Miltank, Forretress (Bug Bite), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)

Which one to build? [all shields, equal] Build 1 (474 spreads: Atk >= 160.68) guarantees 22 of 64 decision matchups, 8 of them under every opponent-IV mode; Build 2 (176: no two- or three-stat rule fits; 176 spreads by list) guarantees 21; Build 3 (430: Atk >= 151.00 + Def/HP staircase (17 steps)) guarantees 21 and holds stat-product rank-1 (SP1).

Build criteria: the same control as the one in the scatter strip below; either handle moves both

Regidrago running Dragon Breath / Dragon Energy, Vise Grip.

[all shields, equal] Build 1 (474 spreads: Atk >= 160.68) guarantees 22 of 64 decision matchups, 8 of them under every opponent-IV mode; Build 2 (176: no two- or three-stat rule fits; 176 spreads by list) guarantees 21; Build 3 (430: Atk >= 151.00 + Def/HP staircase (17 steps)) guarantees 21 and holds stat-product rank-1 (SP1).

Single-stat line: Defense >= 81.39 decides 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow). SP1 clears it.

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

~ Atk >= 160.68

474

22 of 64, 0 of them material; 8 hold under every opponent-IV mode

2v0 Registeel (outside 0%)

19: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v0 Giratina (Altered), +17 more

6/0/0 (266 of 567 matchups)

What Build 1 guarantees (22 of 64), its 474 members

The rule covers 98% of the same spreads (8 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the build.

0v0 (4)
- 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 7%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 18%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 93%
1v0 (3)
- 1v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 11%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 75%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 80%
1v1 (5)
- 1v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 18%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 87%
- 1v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 92%
1v2 (1)
- 1v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 53%
2v0 (4)
- 2v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 0%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 90%
2v1 (1)
- 2v1 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 64%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v2 (4)
- 2v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 6%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 92%
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 94%

Members (474), highest stat product first

Build 2 (fork)

no two- or three-stat rule fits; 176 spreads by list

176

21 of 64, 1 of them material; 16 hold under every opponent-IV mode

0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (outside 18%)

20: 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow), 0v0 Regidrago, +18 more

2/12/1 (278 of 567 matchups)

What Build 2 guarantees (21 of 64), its 176 members

all inside attack IV 0-9, defense IV 8-15, HP IV 0-15; that box also holds 1104 spreads that are not members

No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build.

0v0 (5)
- 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 32%
- 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 39%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 51%
- 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 93%
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 97%
0v1 (3)
- 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 18%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 80%
- 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 95%
1v0 (2)
- 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 30%
- 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 57%
1v1 (6)
- 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 25%; material
- 1v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 33%
- 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 62%
- 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 86%
- 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 88%
1v2 (1)
- 1v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 27%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v0 (1)
- 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 91%
2v2 (3)
- 2v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 72%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 92%
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 94%

Members (176), highest stat product first

Build 3 (bulk)

Atk >= 151.00 + Def/HP staircase (17 steps)

430

21 of 64, 0 of them material; 17 hold under every opponent-IV mode

0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (outside 12%)

20: 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow), 0v0 Regidrago, +18 more

0/13/11 (284 of 567 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 3 guarantees (21 of 64), its steps and its 430 members

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
301	86
302	86
303	86
304	86
305	86
306	84.8
307	84.8
308	84.8
309	83.6
310	83.6
311	83.7
312	82.5
313	82.5
314	82.5
315	82.5
316	82.5
317	82

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (5)
- 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 27%
- 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 34%
- 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 48%
- 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 93%
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 96%
0v1 (3)
- 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 12%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 78%
- 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 94%
1v0 (2)
- 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 25%
- 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 54%
1v1 (5)
- 1v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 28%
- 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 51%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 59%
- 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 85%
- 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 87%
1v2 (1)
- 1v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 22%
2v0 (1)
- 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 90%
2v1 (1)
- 2v1 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 15%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v2 (3)
- 2v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 70%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 91%
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 94%

Members (430), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 3 (bulk)'s most-winning spread 0/13/11@34 wins 18 more matchups overall (284 against 266, of 567), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 1 more of the 64 decision matchups (22 against 21).

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

no two- or three-stat rule fits; 176 spreads by list

176

14 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 21 of 64 overall, 1 of them material; 16 hold under every opponent-IV mode

0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (outside 18%)

20: 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow), 0v0 Regidrago, +18 more

2/12/1 (105 of 189 matchups)

What Build 1 guarantees (14 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 21 of 64 overall), its 176 members

all inside attack IV 0-9, defense IV 8-15, HP IV 0-15; that box also holds 1104 spreads that are not members

No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build.

0v0 (5)
- 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 32%
- 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 39%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 51%
- 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 93%
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 97%
0v1 (3)
- 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 18%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 80%
- 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 95%
1v0 (2)
- 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 30%
- 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 57%
1v1 (6)
- 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 25%; material
- 1v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 33%
- 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 62%
- 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 86%
- 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 88%
1v2 (1)
- 1v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 27%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v0 (1)
- 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 91%
2v2 (3)
- 2v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 72%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 92%
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 94%

Members (176), highest stat product first

Build 1 wide

~ Atk <= 155.10 and Def >= 82.30

662

12 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 16 of 64 overall, 0 of them material; 12 hold under every opponent-IV mode

25: 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow), 0v0 Regidrago, +23 more

What the wider rule keeps and gives up

The rule covers 95% of the same spreads (32 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region.

The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 176 spreads in 662 of its own, and keeps 12 of Build 1's 14 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (16 of its 21 overall, none of them material).

The 5 it gives up out here: 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (grid 21%), 1v1 Dusknoir (grid 28%) and 1v2 Deoxys (Defense) (grid 30%), and 2 more.

Build 2 (fork)

~ Atk >= 160.68

474

13 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 22 of 64 overall, 0 of them material; 8 hold under every opponent-IV mode

2v0 Registeel (outside 0%)

19: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v0 Giratina (Altered), +17 more

12/5/0 (95 of 189 matchups)

What Build 2 guarantees (13 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 22 of 64 overall), its 474 members

The rule covers 98% of the same spreads (8 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the build.

0v0 (4)
- 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 7%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 18%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 93%
1v0 (3)
- 1v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 11%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 75%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 80%
1v1 (5)
- 1v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 18%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 87%
- 1v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 92%
1v2 (1)
- 1v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 53%
2v0 (4)
- 2v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 0%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 90%
2v1 (1)
- 2v1 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 64%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v2 (4)
- 2v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 6%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 92%
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 94%

Members (474), highest stat product first

Build 3 (bulk)

Atk >= 151.00 + Def/HP staircase (17 steps)

430

13 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 21 of 64 overall, 0 of them material; 17 hold under every opponent-IV mode

0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (outside 12%)

20: 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow), 0v0 Regidrago, +18 more

1/8/11 (105 of 189 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 3 guarantees (13 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 21 of 64 overall), its steps and its 430 members

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
301	86
302	86
303	86
304	86
305	86
306	84.8
307	84.8
308	84.8
309	83.6
310	83.6
311	83.7
312	82.5
313	82.5
314	82.5
315	82.5
316	82.5
317	82

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (5)
- 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 27%
- 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 34%
- 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 48%
- 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 93%
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 96%
0v1 (3)
- 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 12%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 78%
- 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 94%
1v0 (2)
- 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 25%
- 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 54%
1v1 (5)
- 1v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 28%
- 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 51%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 59%
- 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 85%
- 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 87%
1v2 (1)
- 1v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 22%
2v0 (1)
- 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 90%
2v1 (1)
- 2v1 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 15%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v2 (3)
- 2v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 70%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 91%
- 2v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 94%

Members (430), highest stat product first

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 241 spreads by list	241	6 of 15 in 1v1 shields; 20 of 64 overall, 1 of them material; 14 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (outside 16%)	20: 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow), 0v0 Regidrago, +18 more	0/7/3 (35 of 63 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (6 of 15 in 1v1 shields; 20 of 64 overall), its 241 members all inside attack IV 0-11, defense IV 6-15, HP IV 0-15; that box also holds 1679 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 30% 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 50% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 16%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 79% 1v0 (2) 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 29% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 56% 1v1 (6) 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 24%; material 1v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 32% 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 61%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (1) 1v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 25%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (1) 2v2 (2) 2v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 71%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (241), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Def >= 82.29 and HP >= 301 (bulk box)	1250	4 of 15 in 1v1 shields; 12 of 64 overall, 0 of them material; 8 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	28: 0v0 Giratina (Altered), 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow), +26 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 241 spreads in 1250 of its own, and keeps 4 of Build 1's 6 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (12 of its 20 overall, none of them material). The 8 it gives up out here: 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (grid 21%), 1v1 Dusknoir (grid 28%) and 1v2 Deoxys (Defense) (grid 30%), and 5 more.
Build 2 (fork)	~ Atk >= 160.68	474	5 of 15 in 1v1 shields; 22 of 64 overall, 0 of them material; 8 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v0 Registeel (outside 0%)	18: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v0 Giratina (Altered), +16 more	6/0/0 (30 of 63 matchups)
What Build 2 guarantees (5 of 15 in 1v1 shields; 22 of 64 overall), its 474 members The rule covers 98% of the same spreads (8 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the build. 0v0 (4) 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 7%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 18%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (3) 1v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 11%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 75%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 80% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 18%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 87% 1v2 (1) 1v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 53% 2v0 (4) 2v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 0%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (1) 2v1 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 64%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (4) 2v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 6%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (474), highest stat product first
Build 3 (bulk)	~ Atk <= 155.10 and Def >= 82.30	662	5 of 15 in 1v1 shields; 16 of 64 overall, 0 of them material; 12 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (outside 22%)	24: 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow), 0v0 Regidrago, +22 more	1/8/11 (36 of 63 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (5 of 15 in 1v1 shields; 16 of 64 overall), its 662 members The rule covers 95% of the same spreads (32 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the build. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 22% 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 44% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 77% 1v0 (1) 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 51% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 23% 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 84% 2v0 (1) 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 90% 2v2 (2) 2v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 68%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (662), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 3 (bulk)'s most-winning spread 1/8/11@35 wins 1 more matchup in 1v1 shields (36 against 35, of 63), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 1 more of the 15 decision matchups in 1v1 shields (6 against 5; 20 against 16 over all 64).

Rates: outside N% is the share of the spreads NOT in that build that win the same matchup anyway; grid N% (the Notable spreads list and the cards at the top of the page) is the share of all the spreads on the grid. Weight follows the rate: bold = fewer than half of them win it; bold and underlined = fewer than a quarter; bold, underlined and italic = fewer than a tenth; dim = more than nine in ten win it anyway.

Each build's guarantee list is sorted by outside rate: how often the spreads NOT in that build win the same matchup anyway. The lower the rate, the rarer the guarantee.

Against the 30 spreads the mirror-slayer protocol converges on for Regidrago (attack-first here), attack of 163.86 and up wins charge-move priority against 25 of them. Inside a build, take the highest attack you have: Build 1 clears it with 5 of 474; Build 2 and Build 3 clear it with none of theirs.

Is mine in one of these?

Paste your Poke Genie CSV, or add one spread by hand, in Check my collection below; the answer comes back here, grouped by build, and your collection stays in your browser.

Shield scenario:

Y: Color:

Stat-product rank against matchups won with PvPoke-default opponent IVs at the league cap over the whole opponent pool and, with Shield scenario on all, every baked shield state -- the view the single-stat line in the expander below was derived on. The Shield scenario selector on this row is the section's own; the scatter's dropdowns and the opponent filter do not drive this panel.

SP1 0/14/15, 0/14/15, 0/13/11, 0/15/15

Notable spreads

Every single spread this page names, on one list: the spread that wins the most matchups, the one with the highest avg battle score, SP1, and each build's most-winning member. Entries whose decision-matchup wins overlap by 90% or more are merged, because two spreads that win the same matchups are one offer.

0/13/11 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios) / Build 3's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 3, which guarantees 21 of the 42 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v2 Rillaboom (grid 2%), 1v1 Lapras (grid 2%) and 2v2 Runerigus (grid 2%)

What else is true of 0/13/11

0/14/15 (Highest avg battle score and SP1) differs from it by 1 decision matchup, so this entry is the offer and they are spellings of it.

6/0/0 -- Build 1's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 1, which guarantees 22 of the 30 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 2v0 Registeel (grid 12%), 2v2 Lapras (Shadow) (grid 17%) and 0v0 Toucannon (grid 18%)

2/12/1 -- Build 2's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 2, which guarantees 21 of the 39 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v0 Florges (grid 4%), 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (grid 9%) and 1v1 Empoleon (grid 12%)

What to do with this: If you already have one of these spreads, build it: each is the top of this grid on the measure that named it. If you are hunting, hunt a build instead -- see the single-stat line for what changes the score.

Wild catches needed to meet one named spread out of the 4096 on this grid: 2839 for a 50% chance, 5678 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

The single-stat line

4 of the 5 movesets on this page carry a line. This page is Dragon Energy, Vise Grip, at least 81.39 defense; Breaking Swipe, Dragon Energy, Dragon Energy, Outrage and Dragon Energy print the same line; Outrage, Vise Grip carries no line.

Line: Def >= 81.39 [gate: enough] -- 2149 of 4096 spreads (52.5%)
Decides: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), rank 3
SP1: 0/14/15 -- clears it
Alternative: HP >= 298, Atk >= 160.68 (474 spreads, 11.6%)
Not claimed: 78 of 99 contested matchups

Regidrago running Dragon Breath / Dragon Energy, Vise Grip in Ultra League has a line at defense, which 0/14/15 at L33.5, 0/13/11 at L34, 0/15/15 at L33 and 2146 other spreads reach. 2149 of the 4096 IV spreads (52.5%) reach it. Every one of the 2149 spreads at or above it wins the 0v0 against Snorlax (Shadow), rank 3; 28 of the 1947 below it win that fight too. That is where a PvPoke-default Snorlax (Shadow) (5/15/14) stops doing 5 with PSYWAVE and starts doing 4. Its BODY_SLAM (105 -> 104) and EARTHQUAKE (161 -> 160) step across the same line. It points the same way in all 4 baked opponent-IV settings and in 4 of the 5 movesets baked here. It is built for the default Snorlax (Shadow); a hundo Snorlax (Shadow) moves it to 83.30, and the ladder further down has the rest.

SP1, 0/14/15, already clears it, so there is nothing to trade away here. Clearing it pays: the spread that clears the line and wins the most matchups, 0/13/11, takes 284 of 567, 2 more than SP1. No higher line keeps 25% of the grid, so this is the last step this page names. Trading defense for the other stats -- 298 HP with 160.68 attack, 474 spreads -- gives up 2 matchups the line holds and picks up 5 matchups the line gives away. At most 1% of the spreads outside the pair win 1 of those; the rest are not exclusive to it. 78 of the 99 contested matchups turn on no single stat at all, and this page does not claim them.

Shield scenario:

Why these regions

Why these regions and not others. The set panel below is every candidate region the builds were cut from. Under it, the same grid grouped by which contested matchups a spread wins -- its win/loss fingerprint, not its score -- drawn on the stat planes where a region is a shape; crossing a breakpoint or bulkpoint moves a spread to the next cluster.

The set panel (an UpSet plot: a bar chart of set intersections, Lex et al. 2014). Left: the named sets the lattice was built from (rows, labelled 'spreads in the set / decision matchups every member of it wins') and the candidate regions made by intersecting them (columns -- bar height is spreads, the number above it is decision matchups guaranteed in the shield scenarios this setting counts, and a coloured column is one of the builds in the table above). A dot means the region sits inside that row's set. The letters index THIS setting's own eight sets and are re-assigned when the Build criteria change, so compare the row names across Build criteria settings, not the letters.

clusters

Shield scenario:

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2590	159.0	80.1	306	#826-#4096	4.1	-
C1	1506	155.1	84.2	306	#1-#2791	7.0	Shadow Forretress (+94pp), Shadow Talonflame (+79pp), Shadow Snorlax (+71pp), Giratina (Altered) (+70pp); trades away Shadow Dusknoir (-60pp), Regidrago (-36pp), Shadow Malamar (-32pp), Toucannon (-29pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Snorlax	27%	98%
Giratina (Altered)	16%	85%
Shadow Dusknoir	60%	0%
Shadow Forretress	0%	94%
Shadow Talonflame	0%	79%
Regidrago	41%	4%
Shadow Feraligatr	0%	58%
Shadow Malamar	32%	0%
Toucannon	29%	0%
Forretress	22%	6%
Shadow Lapras	0%	36%
Galarian Moltres	0%	35%
Seaking	90%	100%
Dusknoir	95%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Snorlax	53%	wins iff def >= 81.40	99%	named
Giratina (Altered)	41%	wins iff sp >= 3,944,888	88%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	38%	wins iff atk >= 158.41	100%	named
Shadow Forretress	35%	wins iff atk < 156.72	92%	named
Shadow Talonflame	29%	wins iff sp >= 3,966,218	95%	named
Regidrago	27%	wins iff atk >= 159.28	98%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	21%	wins iff atk < 155.52	95%	named
Shadow Malamar	20%	wins iff atk >= 159.81	100%	named
Toucannon	18%	wins iff atk >= 160.01	100%	named
Forretress	16%	wins iff atk >= 161.08	93%	named
Shadow Lapras	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,011,475	96%	named
Galarian Moltres	13%	wins iff def >= 84.79	97%	named
Seaking	93%	wins iff hp >= 295	94%	named
Dusknoir	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,813,356	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	204	162.0	76.8	307	#3063-#4096	0.4	-
C1	1310	158.2	80.9	306	#309-#4071	2.6	Shadow Giratina (Altered) (+100pp), Bellibolt (+79pp), Guzzlord (+62pp); trades away Ampharos (-17pp)
C2	1746	158.1	81.0	306	#1103-#3819	4.0	Talonflame (+100pp), Guzzlord (+34pp)
C3	358	155.1	84.8	304	#195-#1801	4.2	Deoxys (Defense) (+98pp), Giratina (Altered) (+18pp); trades away Talonflame (-100pp)
C4	478	153.7	85.3	308	#1-#1139	5.6	Ampharos (+100pp), Giratina (Altered) (+42pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2	C3	C4
Talonflame	0%	0%	100%	0%	0%
Deoxys (Defense)	0%	0%	2%	100%	100%
Guzzlord	0%	62%	95%	100%	100%
Ampharos	17%	0%	0%	0%	100%
Giratina (Altered)	0%	2%	0%	18%	60%
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	0%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Bellibolt	21%	100%	100%	100%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Talonflame	43%	wins iff sp < 3,954,019	75%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	21%	wins iff def >= 84.53	95%	named
Guzzlord	81%	wins iff sp >= 3,871,424	94%	named
Ampharos	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,014,230	95%	named
Giratina (Altered)	9%	wins iff atk < 154.16	95%	named
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	95%	wins iff def >= 77.21	99%	named
Bellibolt	96%	wins iff def >= 77.08	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	706	153.9	85.1	307	#1-#2418	3.4	-
C1	3390	158.3	80.9	306	#320-#4096	4.0	Melmetal (+100pp), Corviknight (+90pp), Shadow Walrein (+26pp), Forretress (Bug Bite) (+23pp); trades away Walrein (-80pp), Empoleon (-50pp), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (-40pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Empoleon	100%	50%
Walrein	99%	19%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	60%	21%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	59%	82%
Shadow Walrein	0%	26%
Corviknight	8%	98%
Melmetal	0%	100%
Florges	14%	2%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Empoleon	59%	wins iff sp >= 3,912,865	90%	named
Walrein	33%	wins iff def >= 83.76	91%	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	28%	wins iff hp >= 310	86%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite)	78%	wins iff def < 87.24	79%	named
Shadow Walrein	21%	wins iff atk >= 159.68	100%	named
Corviknight	82%	wins iff atk >= 155.01	98%	named
Melmetal	82%	wins iff atk >= 155.19	100%	named
Florges	4%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2355	159.2	79.8	306	#965-#4096	7.1	-
C1	1741	155.3	83.9	306	#1-#2884	9.9	Shadow Steelix (+84pp), Shadow Snorlax (+75pp), Rillaboom (+63pp), Dusknoir (+59pp); trades away Shadow Dusknoir (-66pp), Shadow Feraligatr (-47pp), Regidrago (-29pp), Toucannon (-25pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Snorlax	25%	99%
Shadow Dusknoir	66%	0%
Snorlax	39%	96%
Shadow Steelix	0%	84%
Dusknoir	3%	62%
Shadow Feraligatr	47%	0%
Rillaboom	0%	63%
Shadow Malamar	71%	83%
Dondozo	77%	100%
Regidrago	100%	71%
Empoleon	0%	28%
Feraligatr	80%	100%
Toucannon	99%	74%
Seismitoad	0%	22%
Talonflame	0%	18%
Alolan Muk	100%	84%
Lapras	0%	5%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Snorlax	56%	wins iff def >= 81.40	96%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	38%	wins iff atk >= 158.41	100%	named
Snorlax	64%	wins iff sp >= 3,905,587	89%	named
Shadow Steelix	36%	wins iff def >= 82.37	93%	named
Dusknoir	28%	wins iff sp >= 3,963,719	87%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	27%	wins iff atk >= 159.17	99%	named
Rillaboom	27%	wins iff def >= 83.01	92%	named
Shadow Malamar	76%	wins iff hp >= 302	84%	named
Dondozo	87%	wins iff atk < 160.56	96%	named
Regidrago	87%	wins iff atk >= 154.60	100%	named
Empoleon	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,076,747	88%	named
Feraligatr	88%	wins iff def >= 77.67	96%	named
Toucannon	89%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Seismitoad	9%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Talonflame	8%	wins iff sp >= 4,028,918	97%	named
Alolan Muk	93%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Lapras	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,062,224	99%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3766	157.9	81.2	306	#111-#4096	2.9	-
C1	330	153.3	85.6	308	#1-#710	5.9	Talonflame (+88pp), Feraligatr (+88pp), Deoxys (Defense) (+76pp), Dondozo (+74pp); trades away Virizion (-64pp), Swampert (-64pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Swampert	64%	0%
Shadow Steelix	28%	86%
Deoxys (Defense)	24%	100%
Virizion	78%	14%
Feraligatr	9%	97%
Shadow Ampharos	88%	100%
Talonflame	1%	89%
Dondozo	0%	75%
Rillaboom	0%	26%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Swampert	58%	wins iff atk >= 157.04	100%	named
Shadow Steelix	32%	wins iff def >= 82.37	90%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	30%	wins iff sp >= 3,974,872	91%	named
Virizion	73%	wins iff atk >= 153.96	80%	named
Feraligatr	17%	wins iff sp >= 4,001,993	93%	named
Shadow Ampharos	89%	wins iff atk < 160.96	96%	named
Talonflame	8%	wins iff sp >= 4,028,918	97%	named
Dondozo	6%	wins iff sp >= 4,033,062	97%	named
Rillaboom	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,060,636	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1211	154.8	84.5	306	#1-#3752	1.4	-
C1	2885	158.7	80.4	306	#504-#4096	1.9	Forretress (Bug Bite) (+89pp), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (+59pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (+22pp); trades away Steelix (-58pp), Annihilape (-57pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	0%	59%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	5%	94%
Steelix	65%	7%
Annihilape	58%	0%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	0%	22%
Forretress	15%	11%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	42%	wins iff def < 81.82	77%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite)	68%	wins iff atk >= 155.95	92%	named
Steelix	24%	wins iff sp >= 3,994,032	90%	named
Annihilape	17%	wins iff def >= 84.64	98%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	16%	wins iff hp >= 317	85%	named
Forretress	12%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1003	158.9	79.8	307	#1470-#3810	4.7	-
C1	1429	156.4	82.7	306	#176-#3819	5.1	Shadow Cradily (+65pp), Guzzlord (+42pp), Annihilape (+17pp), Alolan Muk (+16pp); trades away Regidrago (-100pp)
C2	681	161.3	78.0	305	#2711-#4096	5.6	Shadow Lapras (+100pp), Regidrago (+100pp), Shadow Malamar (+77pp); trades away Guzzlord (-96pp), Shadow Cradily (-65pp), Seaking (-46pp), Annihilape (-17pp)
C3	572	156.6	83.4	303	#204-#3565	6.6	Shadow Cradily (+99pp), Guzzlord (+96pp), Alolan Muk (+61pp), Seaking (+46pp); trades away Shadow Lapras (-100pp), Shadow Malamar (-94pp)
C4	411	153.5	85.6	307	#1-#857	7.5	Shadow Malamar (+91pp), Annihilape (+90pp), Alolan Muk (+39pp), Runerigus (+22pp); trades away Regidrago (-92pp), Virizion (-71pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2	C3	C4
Shadow Cradily	0%	65%	0%	99%	100%
Regidrago	100%	0%	100%	99%	7%
Shadow Malamar	14%	23%	100%	6%	97%
Guzzlord	57%	99%	3%	99%	100%
Alolan Muk	0%	16%	0%	61%	100%
Annihilape	0%	17%	0%	10%	100%
Shadow Lapras	0%	0%	100%	0%	0%
Seaking	99%	100%	54%	100%	100%
Virizion	100%	99%	100%	100%	29%
Skeledirge	100%	89%	100%	88%	100%
Runerigus	0%	0%	0%	0%	22%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Cradily	47%	wins iff def >= 82.11	98%	named
Regidrago	56%	wins iff atk >= 157.79	91%	named
Shadow Malamar	39%	wins iff atk >= 159.81	82%	named
Guzzlord	73%	wins iff atk < 159.31	91%	named
Alolan Muk	24%	wins iff atk < 155.56	91%	named
Annihilape	17%	wins iff def >= 84.64	98%	named
Shadow Lapras	17%	wins iff atk >= 160.10	100%	named
Seaking	92%	wins iff def >= 77.80	98%	named
Virizion	93%	wins iff atk >= 153.96	100%	named
Skeledirge	94%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Runerigus	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,057,131	99%	named

all scenarios: 72 win/loss bits (one per contested opponent per scenario) concatenated across 7 of 9 shield scenarios (0v2, 2v0 excluded as degenerate); 1426 distinct win patterns; K=2 clusters (silhouette 0.49); split at atk 155.72.

Sharpest single scenarios on this page: 0v1 shields (K=5, silhouette 0.77 over 7 contested opponents, split atk 156.53) and 1v2 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.61 over 9 contested opponents, split atk 153.90) -- pick them in the dropdown above.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3111	158.6	80.6	306	#530-#4096	28.4	-
C1	985	154.5	84.8	306	#1-#1824	40.7	Deoxys (Defense) [1v2] (+91pp), Shadow Forretress [0v0] (+85pp), Deoxys (Defense) [0v1] (+83pp), Walrein [1v0] (+83pp); trades away Forretress (Bug Bite) [2v1] (-78pp), Swampert [1v2] (-76pp), Melmetal [1v0] (-70pp), Corviknight [1v0] (-62pp)

Per-cluster win rates vs each contested opponent

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Snorlax [0v0]	39%	99%
Shadow Cradily [2v2]	31%	96%
Regidrago [2v2]	66%	22%
Shadow Snorlax [1v1]	42%	100%
Talonflame [0v1]	56%	1%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [2v1]	54%	3%
Swampert [1v2]	77%	0%
Empoleon [1v0]	45%	100%
Giratina (Altered) [0v0]	23%	100%
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	31%	62%
Shadow Dusknoir [0v0]	50%	0%
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	50%	0%
Snorlax [1v1]	52%	99%
Shadow Steelix [1v1]	17%	95%
Shadow Forretress [0v0]	14%	99%
Walrein [1v0]	13%	96%
Shadow Steelix [1v2]	16%	86%
Forretress (Bug Bite) [2v1]	86%	9%
Deoxys (Defense) [1v2]	8%	99%
Shadow Talonflame [0v0]	10%	91%
Dusknoir [1v1]	10%	84%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [1v0]	19%	56%
Regidrago [0v0]	34%	7%
Virizion [1v2]	74%	69%
Shadow Feraligatr [1v1]	36%	0%
Guzzlord [2v2]	64%	100%
Rillaboom [1v1]	9%	84%
Steelix [2v1]	7%	77%
Alolan Muk [2v2]	8%	75%
Shadow Malamar [1v1]	71%	92%
Forretress (Bug Bite) [1v0]	86%	55%
Shadow Walrein [1v0]	28%	0%
Shadow Feraligatr [0v0]	4%	78%
Deoxys (Defense) [0v1]	1%	84%
Shadow Malamar [0v0]	26%	0%
Guzzlord [0v1]	75%	100%
Toucannon [0v0]	24%	0%
Corviknight [1v0]	97%	35%
Melmetal [1v0]	99%	29%
Annihilape [2v1]	0%	72%
Annihilape [2v2]	0%	72%
Shadow Lapras [2v2]	22%	0%
Feraligatr [1v2]	2%	61%
Forretress [0v0]	20%	3%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [2v1]	20%	1%
Shadow Lapras [0v0]	0%	55%
Dondozo [1v1]	82%	100%
Galarian Moltres [0v0]	0%	54%
Ampharos [0v1]	1%	48%
Regidrago [1v1]	100%	48%
Empoleon [1v1]	5%	33%
Forretress [2v1]	12%	10%
Feraligatr [1v1]	85%	100%
Toucannon [1v1]	92%	80%
Shadow Ampharos [1v2]	85%	100%
Seismitoad [1v1]	1%	36%
Giratina (Altered) [0v1]	0%	38%
Talonflame [1v1]	0%	32%
Talonflame [1v2]	0%	32%
Seaking [2v2]	90%	100%
Virizion [2v2]	100%	69%
Alolan Muk [1v1]	97%	81%
Seaking [0v0]	91%	100%
Dondozo [1v2]	0%	26%
Skeledirge [2v2]	93%	98%
Shadow Giratina (Altered) [0v1]	93%	100%
Bellibolt [0v1]	95%	100%
Florges [1v0]	0%	15%
Dusknoir [0v0]	96%	100%
Runerigus [2v2]	0%	9%
Lapras [1v1]	0%	9%
Rillaboom [1v2]	0%	9%

Green tint = the cluster mostly wins that matchup, red tint = mostly loses; the percentage is the share of the cluster's IVs that win.

Stat rules that reproduce the clusters (in-sample accuracy 96.3%)

atk < 155.72:
  atk < 155.24:
    atk < 154.79:
      -> cluster C1 (n=591)
    atk >= 154.79:
      -> cluster C1 (n=184)
  atk >= 155.24:
    def < 84.59:
      -> cluster C0 (n=156)
    def >= 84.59:
      -> cluster C1 (n=62)
atk >= 155.72:
  def < 84.61:
    atk < 155.98:
      -> cluster C0 (n=115)
    atk >= 155.98:
      -> cluster C0 (n=2885)
  def >= 84.61:
    hp < 297.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=47)
    hp >= 297.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=56)

Depth-3 decision tree over (atk, def, hp). Accuracy is in-sample (regularized by a minimum leaf size), not cross-validated -- read it as "how well the clusters reduce to stat regions", not a prediction claim.

Matchup flip thresholds (candidate anchors)

The single stat and threshold that most accurately predicts win/loss across all IVs -- misclassifications allowed, so it is a diagnostic and a candidate anchor, not a build target. The "flips at" cutoffs under "Threats where your build choice matters" answer the other question (the lowest cutoff whose 75/25 split is clean) and are usually higher for the same opponent.

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Snorlax [0v0]	53%	wins iff def >= 81.40	99%	named
Shadow Cradily [2v2]	47%	wins iff def >= 82.11	98%	named
Regidrago [2v2]	56%	wins iff atk >= 157.79	91%	named
Shadow Snorlax [1v1]	56%	wins iff def >= 81.40	96%	named
Talonflame [0v1]	43%	wins iff sp < 3,954,019	75%	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [2v1]	42%	wins iff def < 81.82	77%	named
Swampert [1v2]	58%	wins iff atk >= 157.04	100%	named
Empoleon [1v0]	59%	wins iff sp >= 3,912,865	90%	named
Giratina (Altered) [0v0]	41%	wins iff sp >= 3,944,888	88%	named
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	39%	wins iff atk >= 159.81	82%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [0v0]	38%	wins iff atk >= 158.41	100%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	38%	wins iff atk >= 158.41	100%	named
Snorlax [1v1]	64%	wins iff sp >= 3,905,587	89%	named
Shadow Steelix [1v1]	36%	wins iff def >= 82.37	93%	named
Shadow Forretress [0v0]	35%	wins iff atk < 156.72	92%	named
Walrein [1v0]	33%	wins iff def >= 83.76	91%	named
Shadow Steelix [1v2]	32%	wins iff def >= 82.37	90%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite) [2v1]	68%	wins iff atk >= 155.95	92%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [1v2]	30%	wins iff sp >= 3,974,872	91%	named
Shadow Talonflame [0v0]	29%	wins iff sp >= 3,966,218	95%	named
Dusknoir [1v1]	28%	wins iff sp >= 3,963,719	87%	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [1v0]	28%	wins iff hp >= 310	86%	named
Regidrago [0v0]	27%	wins iff atk >= 159.28	98%	named
Virizion [1v2]	73%	wins iff atk >= 153.96	80%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [1v1]	27%	wins iff atk >= 159.17	99%	named
Guzzlord [2v2]	73%	wins iff atk < 159.31	91%	named
Rillaboom [1v1]	27%	wins iff def >= 83.01	92%	named
Steelix [2v1]	24%	wins iff sp >= 3,994,032	90%	named
Alolan Muk [2v2]	24%	wins iff atk < 155.56	91%	named
Shadow Malamar [1v1]	76%	wins iff hp >= 302	84%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite) [1v0]	78%	wins iff def < 87.24	79%	named
Shadow Walrein [1v0]	21%	wins iff atk >= 159.68	100%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [0v0]	21%	wins iff atk < 155.52	95%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [0v1]	21%	wins iff def >= 84.53	95%	named
Shadow Malamar [0v0]	20%	wins iff atk >= 159.81	100%	named
Guzzlord [0v1]	81%	wins iff sp >= 3,871,424	94%	named
Toucannon [0v0]	18%	wins iff atk >= 160.01	100%	named
Corviknight [1v0]	82%	wins iff atk >= 155.01	98%	named
Melmetal [1v0]	82%	wins iff atk >= 155.19	100%	named
Annihilape [2v1]	17%	wins iff def >= 84.64	98%	named
Annihilape [2v2]	17%	wins iff def >= 84.64	98%	named
Shadow Lapras [2v2]	17%	wins iff atk >= 160.10	100%	named
Feraligatr [1v2]	17%	wins iff sp >= 4,001,993	93%	named
Forretress [0v0]	16%	wins iff atk >= 161.08	93%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [2v1]	16%	wins iff hp >= 317	85%	named
Shadow Lapras [0v0]	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,011,475	96%	named
Dondozo [1v1]	87%	wins iff atk < 160.56	96%	named
Galarian Moltres [0v0]	13%	wins iff def >= 84.79	97%	named
Ampharos [0v1]	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,014,230	95%	named
Regidrago [1v1]	87%	wins iff atk >= 154.60	100%	named
Empoleon [1v1]	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,076,747	88%	named
Forretress [2v1]	12%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Feraligatr [1v1]	88%	wins iff def >= 77.67	96%	named
Toucannon [1v1]	89%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Ampharos [1v2]	89%	wins iff atk < 160.96	96%	named
Seismitoad [1v1]	9%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Giratina (Altered) [0v1]	9%	wins iff atk < 154.16	95%	named
Talonflame [1v1]	8%	wins iff sp >= 4,028,918	97%	named
Talonflame [1v2]	8%	wins iff sp >= 4,028,918	97%	named
Seaking [2v2]	92%	wins iff def >= 77.80	98%	named
Virizion [2v2]	93%	wins iff atk >= 153.96	100%	named
Alolan Muk [1v1]	93%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Seaking [0v0]	93%	wins iff hp >= 295	94%	named
Dondozo [1v2]	6%	wins iff sp >= 4,033,062	97%	named
Skeledirge [2v2]	94%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Giratina (Altered) [0v1]	95%	wins iff def >= 77.21	99%	named
Bellibolt [0v1]	96%	wins iff def >= 77.08	100%	named
Florges [1v0]	4%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Dusknoir [0v0]	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,813,356	98%	named
Runerigus [2v2]	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,057,131	99%	named
Lapras [1v1]	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,062,224	99%	named
Rillaboom [1v2]	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,060,636	98%	named

Rows are ordered by discriminating power (win rate closest to 50%). "Rule accuracy" is how well that single stat threshold predicts the win/loss across all IVs, and is only shown when it beats always-predicting the majority outcome; high-accuracy UNNAMED rows are candidate new anchors. "Named" means an authored anchor names that opponent (alt-moveset / IV-variant rows inherit their base opponent's anchor).

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2542	159.1	80.0	306	#826-#4096	16.3	-
C1	1554	155.1	84.2	306	#1-#2791	23.3	Shadow Forretress [0v0] (+91pp), Shadow Steelix [1v1] (+84pp), Shadow Talonflame [0v0] (+76pp), Shadow Cradily [2v2] (+71pp); trades away Shadow Dusknoir [0v0] (-61pp), Shadow Dusknoir [1v1] (-61pp), Regidrago [2v2] (-51pp), Shadow Feraligatr [1v1] (-44pp)

Computed at bake time for moveset DRAGON_BREATH / DRAGON_ENERGY, VICE_GRIP with PvPoke default opponent IVs and bait-selective shield play, over the full opponent pool; this does not follow the scatter's moveset / opponent-IV / bait dropdowns or the opponent filter.

How this works

Per shield scenario: an opponent is contested when between 2% and 98% of this dive's IV spreads beat it (everyone else is settled and can't distinguish IVs). Each IV's fingerprint is its win/loss vector over those opponents; fingerprints are clustered bottom-up (agglomerative, Hamming distance, average linkage). The number of clusters, K, is chosen by silhouette -- a 0-to-1 score of how cleanly the fingerprints separate, where above about 0.5 the clusters are distinct groups and below 0.30 the headline says "weak separation" and the clusters are tendencies rather than tiers -- under a parsimony floor (a split must keep every cluster above a minimum size, and the smallest K in 2-6 within 0.03 of the best silhouette wins). Silhouettes are comparable between the scenarios on this page, not between species. Clusters are ordered weakest to strongest by mean contested wins. The scatter panels project the same 4,096 IV spreads onto each pair of battle stats; clusters that overlap completely in score separate cleanly there. A scenario is reported as degenerate (no clustering attempted) when it has fewer than 6 contested opponents or fewer than 8 distinct win patterns -- on that little data every candidate K scores near-perfectly, which is a measurement artifact and not structure -- and its bits are left out of the all scenarios fingerprint. A scenario that clears the floor but has no split keeping every cluster above the minimum size is reported as fragmented instead, and its bits still count toward the combined view. The all scenarios bits are ordered most-discriminating first, which is the tie-break the linkage uses when several merges are equally close. Replaces the retired score-gap cluster heuristic (2026-07), which usually (~77% of sampled runs) fired on float-level jitter in the opponent-averaged score, and even when it did catch a real tier could not name which matchups defined it.

Evidence

1. Header

Regidrago -- Ultra League

DRAGON_BREATH / DRAGON_ENERGY, VICE_GRIP (arm 1 of 5)

Level view: L50. Bake 2026-09-27. Blob 20260927_120319_Regidrago_ultra.replay.pkl.gz.

Opponent pool: 63 entries (Custom pool from ul_top60.txt (60 mons)). Grid: 4096 IV spreads x 9 shield scenarios.

Opponent-IV settings baked: PvPoke-default opponent IVs; PvPoke-default opponent IVs, focal never baits; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits.

Rankings snapshot 2026-09-27.

2. Floor

Def >= 81.39 -- 2149 of 4096 spreads (52.5%).

At the one decimal place PvPoke and Poke Genie display this reads Def >= 81.3, which selects 2172 spreads where the exact value selects 2149: 23 more spreads land inside a line printed that way.

Primitive: ONE-SIDED GATE (sufficient) -- every one of the 2149 spreads at or above the line wins the cell, and 28 of the 1947 below it win it too (98.6% of the spreads below lose, against a bar of 97%). Clearing the line is sufficient here, not necessary.

Mechanism: bulkpoint -- Snorlax (Shadow)'s (5/15/14) PSYWAVE drops from 5 to 4 damage into us across the cut (BODY_SLAM 105 -> 104 and EARTHQUAKE 161 -> 160 step across it too).

Decides: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3).

After collapsing pool variants, this cut is owned by one base species (Snorlax, rank 3); if it leaves the pool the cut has no owner.

Below the cut: 28 of 1947 spreads win the cell, and they score 369-504. At or above: 2149 of 2149 win, scoring 505-617.

Direction: the cut points the same way in 4 of 4 opponent-IV settings and 4 of 5 moveset arms (win rate at or above it at least 90%, and above the rate below it).

Partition is the stricter question, asked of the SAME printed line: it splits the cell exactly (everything at or above the line wins, everything below it loses) in 0 of 4 settings and 0 of 5 arms. A partition implies the direction test, never the other way round, so this count can never exceed the one above it. Does not partition: pvpoke, pvpoke:nobait, rank1, rank1:nobait.

Separability is a THIRD and non-comparable measurement -- each view's OWN cut, at whatever value it sits: 0 of 5 arms and 0 of 4 settings separate this cell at some value. Per arm -- DRAGON_BREATH / DRAGON_ENERGY, VICE_GRIP: no clean cut (53.1% win); DRAGON_BREATH / BREAKING_SWIPE, DRAGON_ENERGY: no clean cut (52.2% win); DRAGON_BREATH / DRAGON_ENERGY, OUTRAGE: no clean cut (52.2% win); DRAGON_BREATH / OUTRAGE, VICE_GRIP: no clean cut (39.6% win); DRAGON_BREATH / DRAGON_ENERGY: no clean cut (52.2% win).

The same cell's cut in each setting: pvpoke no clean cut (53.1% win); pvpoke:nobait no clean cut (53.1% win); rank1 no clean cut (62.1% win); rank1:nobait no clean cut (62.1% win).

Wild catches needed to clear this line: 1 for a 50% chance, 2 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

3. Lines on the other stats

Neither attack nor HP carries a line of its own on this arm: no threshold on either clears every gate with a pool inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

4. Example spreads

Existence proofs; each selection rule is printed with its spread.

rule	IVs	level	Atk / Def / HP	stat product	contested cells	all cells
highest stat product clearing the floor	0/14/15	L33.5	152.05 / 86.56 / 312	100.00% (#1)	61	282
most cells won among clearers with SP >= 95%	0/13/11	L34.0	152.65 / 86.15 / 310	99.27% (#25)	63	284
bulkiest (max Def x HP) among clearers with SP >= 95%	0/15/15	L33.0	151.45 / 86.97 / 311	99.75% (#4)	60	281

Cells won by shield scenario

spread	0v0	0v1	0v2	1v0	1v1	1v2	2v0	2v1	2v2	total
rank-1 0/14/15	34	8	2	52	32	14	57	49	34	282
0/14/15	34	8	2	52	32	14	57	49	34	282
0/13/11	36	8	2	52	34	13	56	49	34	284
0/15/15	34	8	2	52	32	13	57	49	34	281

Clearers reach the CP cap at a median level of L32.5 (2149 of 2149 at L45.0 or below) against L34.5 below the floor (1947 of 1947).

5. Rank-1 check

Stat-product rank-1 is 0/14/15 at L33.5: 152.05 attack / 86.56 Def / 312 HP. It wins 282 of 567 cells (61 of the 99 contested ones).

It already clears the floor; there is no trade to make.

It is not a member of the Alternative target below.

6. Alternative target

HP >= 298, Atk >= 160.68: 474 spreads (11.6%), stat product 91.9% to 94.6% of rank-1, attack 160.69-163.98.

It is built on HP and attack -- the two stats the printed defense line does not use.

1 of the 5 cells it wins with every member are won by at most 1% of the spreads outside the rectangle: 2v0 Registeel (rank 28; degenerate scenario).

Rule: among (HP, Atk) rectangles with at least 100 members and no floor clearer, the one winning the most contested cells the floor cannot (won by every member, by at most 1% of clearers); ties broken by member count. Only cells against a top-50 opponent in a non-degenerate scenario may select it. The printed cuts are the least attained values among the members.

Wins 5 cells with every member that the floor does not: 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49), 0v0 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 54), 1v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41), 2v0 Registeel (rank 28; degenerate scenario), 2v2 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23).

Gives up 2 cells the floor guarantees: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3), 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3).

No spread satisfies both this rectangle and the defense line.

Wild catches needed to land inside this rectangle: 6 for a 50% chance, 12 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

Members win 254-266 cells in total.

IV envelope of the members -- attack IV 6-15, Def IV 0-8, HP IV 0-15. Members per attack IV: 6: 1, 7: 3, 8: 6, 9: 32, 10: 42, 11: 52, 12: 64, 13: 73, 14: 84, 15: 117.

Highest stat product inside it: 15/6/12 at L31.5 (94.63% of rank-1), 15/7/8 at L31.5 (94.58% of rank-1), 10/3/4 at L34.5 (94.55% of rank-1), 9/2/5 at L35.0 (94.54% of rank-1), 9/1/9 at L35.0 (94.53% of rank-1).

7. Cost

This test finds no reverse single-stat clean cut: no cell on this dive is won by every LOW spread and lost by every high one.

The cost as an exact cell diff -- 0/13/11 (most cells won among clearers with SP >= 95%) against rank-1: 4 cells gained, 2 lost.

Lost, top-20 opponents: 1v2 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7), 2v0 Florges (rank 12).

8. Rungs above

No further clean rung above the floor keeps 25% of the grid.

9. Material clean cuts below the floor

No material rung below the floor.

10. Bulk

No clean Def or HP cut exists on this dive (0 of 99 contested cells on Def, 0 on HP; 20 are attack cuts).

The bulk shape available inside the line -- the highest Def attained at each HP among the spreads clearing it:

Within the clearers, cells won in total run 249-284.

HP	highest Def attained	spreads
290	84.17	2
291	84.17	1
292	84.88	5
293	85.23	17
294	85.23	20
295	85.58	39
296	85.93	60
297	86.28	76
298	86.63	98
299	86.97	122
300	86.97	115
301	87.32	151
302	87.66	141
303	87.66	158
304	87.66	164
305	87.66	144
306	87.66	156
307	87.32	138
308	87.32	126
309	87.32	114
310	86.97	87
311	86.97	75
312	86.56	55
313	85.39	36
314	84.21	29
315	83.77	9
316	83.01	8
317	82.56	3

Co-gates inside the floor (every clearer in the sub-rectangle wins the cell; the rate outside it is printed beside): Atk >= 153.96 (1845 clearers) wins 2v2 Virizion rank 6, against 0.0% without it; Atk >= 154.59 (1636 clearers) wins 1v1 Regidrago rank 33, against 0.0% without it; Atk >= 155.19 (1435 clearers) wins 1v0 Melmetal rank 5, against 0.0% without it; Atk >= 155.76 (1176 clearers) wins 1v1 Muk (Alolan) rank 36, against 73.6% without it; Atk >= 156.40 (902 clearers) wins 1v1 Toucannon rank 49, against 70.1% without it; Atk >= 157.03 (641 clearers) wins 1v2 Swampert rank 48, against 0.0% without it; Atk >= 157.78 (360 clearers) wins 2v2 Regidrago rank 33, against 20.5% without it; Atk >= 157.96 (292 clearers) wins 1v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) rank 31, against 53.5% without it; HP >= 304 (1144 clearers) wins 1v0 Empoleon rank 8, against 59.7% without it; HP >= 304 (1144 clearers) wins 1v1 Snorlax rank 11, against 56.1% without it; HP >= 310 (302 clearers) wins 0v0 Giratina (Altered) rank 17, against 57.0% without it; HP >= 310 (302 clearers) wins 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) rank 39, against 16.5% without it; HP >= 311 (215 clearers) wins 1v2 Deoxys (Defense) rank 42, against 42.8% without it. These are sufficient conditions, never necessary ones.

11. Coverage

What each of Snorlax (Shadow)'s own 4096 spreads asks of our defense: the lowest attainable value that holds its PSYWAVE to 4 damage (from 5).

"held" is the share of that species' own grid whose attack is at or below the row's, and so is held by the same value: the damage it does to us is its attack over our defense, so its IV grid traces out the ladder the same way an attacker's does.

The column is not monotone, and that is a CP-cap effect rather than a transcription error: under the cap a hundo sits at a lower level than a low-attack spread, so it carries less attack. The highest-attack Snorlax (Shadow) is 14/0/0.

opponent build	defense you need	held	focal clearers
rank-1 (0/12/15)	80.65	3.0%	2496
PvPoke default (5/15/14)	81.39	10.9%	2149
10/10/10 (raid/research floor)	82.71	45.0%	1516
grid median	82.96	51.8%	1434
hundo (15/15/15)	83.30	62.2%	1297
12/12/12 (lucky trade)	82.80	48.7%	1500
the max-attack Snorlax (4 spreads)	85.87	100.0%	254

"focal" is the count of our spreads at or above that value. The printed floor is the PvPoke-default row; it is the line every reference tool quotes, not a guarantee against every build of that species.

12. Mirror

Against the pool's own Regidrago entry. Seat: our side is the optimised row; the mirror opponent always baits.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 0 0 0 4096 4075 0 4096 4096 1483.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 0 0 0 4096 0 0 4096 4096 176.

shields	win rate below the floor	win rate at/above	win rate over the whole grid
0v0	51.7%	5.5%	27.5%
0v1	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
0v2	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
1v0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
1v1	100.0%	76.1%	87.5%
1v2	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
2v0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
2v1	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
2v2	79.6%	33.8%	55.6%

13. Changes the score, not the matchup

Cells won (or lost) by every spread where the battle score still steps by at least 60 at one attainable attack value.

Ordered by how close the step comes to the win line (500), nearest first: the question this field answers is how close a cell is to becoming a matchup, not how large the swing inside it is.

12 of 41 steps are listed, closest to the win line first; 29 more are not.

value	cell	rank	score step	points from 500	outcome
Atk >= 162.97	1v2 Steelix	rank 44	355 -> 490	10 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 155.19	0v0 Blastoise	rank 29	527 -> 620	27 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 154.54	0v0 Muk (Alolan)	rank 36	530 -> 595	30 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 161.92	0v1 Milotic (Shadow)	rank 50	383 -> 464	36 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 157.44	2v0 Mimikyu	rank 10	366 -> 462	38 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 163.10	2v2 Primarina	rank 51	308 -> 438	62 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 157.64	2v1 Clefable	rank 37	350 -> 437	63 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 155.19	2v2 Blastoise	rank 29	569 -> 700	69 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 153.24	2v1 Dusknoir	rank 24	575 -> 644	75 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 162.97	1v0 Steelix	rank 44	586 -> 756	86 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 155.19	2v0 Melmetal	rank 5	605 -> 692	105 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 162.97	1v0 Cresselia (Shadow)	rank 46	618 -> 871	118 (widening)	won on both sides

14. Not claimed

78 of 99 contested matchups have no clean single-stat rule and are not claimed.

6 of 63 top-50 matchups are listed, one per base species and closest to an even split first; 57 more are not.

cell	rank	win rate inside the floor
1v1 Rillaboom	rank 21	51.1%
1v2 Deoxys (Defense)	rank 42	48.5%
2v1 Forretress (Bug Bite)	rank 31	46.6%
2v2 Muk (Alolan)	rank 36	45.7%
1v1 Dusknoir	rank 24	44.9%
1v0 Walrein	rank 40	55.6%

15. How sure

20 clean attack cuts, 0 on Def, 0 on HP, over 99 contested cells (221 cells are won by every spread, 247 lost by every spread).

Scenarios barred from carrying a floor -- fewer than 6 contested cells, or fewer than 8 distinct opponent columns among them; the dive page's "degenerate" flag applies the same two numbers to its own stricter counts, so it can flag a different set: 0v2 (1 contested, 3 distinct opponent columns), 2v0 (5 contested, 7 distinct opponent columns).

The printed floor is a one-sided gate, not an exact cut: in its own setting it leaves 28 of 4096 spreads on the wrong side of it. The partition counts below are measured on that same line, so they are counts of settings where it happens to be exact.

The printed floor partitions its cell exactly in 0 of 4 opponent-IV settings and 0 of 5 arms; its direction survives in 4 and 4 of them. Separately, and not comparably, the cell has a clean cut at SOME value in 0 settings and 0 arms.

It is owned by one base species (Snorlax); if it leaves the pool the floor has no owner.

Both baked opponent cohorts sit low in Snorlax (Shadow)'s own attack grid (3.0% and 10.9% of it at or below them, and so held by the same value), so "0 of 4 settings" is not robustness against attack-weighted opponent builds; the coverage ladder is.

The same cell has no clean cut in the level-51 view.

Independent check: the dive page's matchup clusters, under "Why these regions", which partition this same grid by whole win/loss fingerprint across all 7 non-degenerate shield scenarios, splits it on attack (at 155.72), not defense -- the two methods do not agree on this dive (K=2, silhouette 0.49).

Not measured here: opponent IVs outside the baked cohorts, post-match HP and shields, XL or dust cost, and any live-game check of the priority convention.

16. Provenance

Every threshold in this section is one of three things, and each is badged where it is printed. An EXACT clean cut: every spread at or above it wins the named cell and no spread below it does. A ONE-SIDED GATE: one side is pure and the other is at least 97% pure -- either nothing below it wins (clearing it is necessary) or everything at or above it wins (clearing it is sufficient). A NEAR-EXACT split: at most 0.5% of the grid sits on the wrong side of it in total. The win predicate is gopvpsim.battle.is_win (score > 500; 500 itself is a tie, not a win).

That is stricter than the two numbers the dive page prints for the same opponent: the Threats "flips at" boundary (a 75/25 gate, so spreads on the passing side can still lose) and the Matchup clusters flip table's single-stat split for that one opponent (the most accurate such split, misclassifications allowed). The cluster line in "How sure" above is a third thing again: not one opponent but the stat rule that reproduces that section's "all scenarios" partition of the whole grid.

Priority ties: the coverage ladder counts an exact attack tie as NOT beaten. The engine is seat-dependent on an exact tie, so a tied line is not a guarantee in either direction.

Ranks and opponent builds are read live from the 2026-09-27 rankings snapshot and the current gamemaster; this blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so the render is a function of the blob plus those two live reads.

Auto-derived: this section is generated by scripts/deep_dive_brief.py from the replay blob. No human prose is in it.

How the line was selected (gates and guards)

Decision band for the floor (D1): the lowest ELIGIBLE rung whose clearer pool sits inside [25%, 60%] of the grid. Materiality band for a rung: [10%, 90%].

To be ELIGIBLE AS THE FLOOR -- not to be listed as a rung -- a cut needs at least 20 attack/20 defense/5 HP distinct attainable values below it, an opponent of rank 50 or better outside the caveat list, a non-degenerate shield scenario, a win rate at or above the cut of at least 90% in every setting, and a closed-form mechanism. Listing is a weaker bar: a rung is printed when it keeps 25% of the grid (above the floor) or sits in the materiality band (below it) AND points the same way in at least 2 settings, so a listed rung may be unattributed, low-ranked or 2-of-4.

A cut can fail several gates at once, so the failure tally below sums to more than the number of cuts.

Co-gate sub-rectangles need 5% of the grid; the alternative target needs 100 members; a score-only step needs 60 points. These constants are calibrated on one species and are parameters of the stage that uses them, not tuned per dive.

Floor pool by primitive on the defense axis -- the axis the cross-stat rule selected -- each selected on its own under the same band and the same gates: exact -> no candidate in the band; one-sided gate -> Def >= 81.39 (0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 52.5%); near-exact -> no candidate in the band. Selected: the one-sided gate at Def >= 81.39. Selection takes the lowest eligible rung in the band; a stronger primitive within 0.50 stat points of it wins the tie, in the order exact, one-sided gate, near-exact. A gate needs 97% of its dirty side pointing the right way; a near-exact split needs at most 0.5% of the grid on the wrong side. Only exact rungs merge, in either direction.

Degradation ladder: rung reached = floor.

Of 20 clean cuts, 1 clears every gate. Gate failures: G-direction 18, G-material-lo 5, G-rank 4, G-scenario 3, G-attributed 2, G-material-hi 2, G-material-gap 2.

Of 58 one-sided gate and near-exact candidates, 1 clears every gate. Gate failures: G-direction 43, G-material-hi 41, G-material-gap 41, G-attributed 33, G-material-lo 14, G-rank 9, G-scenario 3.

G-cmp-fresh (WARN, not a failure): 2 cut(s) have a live priority line within 0.50 attack of the cut but outside its gap, so they print unattributed: 1v1 Feraligatr (Shadow), 1v1 Regidrago. This blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so a rebalance since the bake would look exactly like this.

Floor cell in pvpoke: no clean cut, 53.1% win

Floor cell in pvpoke:nobait: no clean cut, 53.1% win

Floor cell in rank1: no clean cut, 62.1% win

Floor cell in rank1:nobait: no clean cut, 62.1% win

Floor cell on arm 'DRAGON_BREATH / DRAGON_ENERGY, VICE_GRIP': no clean cut, 53.1% win

Floor cell on arm 'DRAGON_BREATH / BREAKING_SWIPE, DRAGON_ENERGY': no clean cut, 52.2% win

Floor cell on arm 'DRAGON_BREATH / DRAGON_ENERGY, OUTRAGE': no clean cut, 52.2% win

Floor cell on arm 'DRAGON_BREATH / OUTRAGE, VICE_GRIP': no clean cut, 39.6% win

Floor cell on arm 'DRAGON_BREATH / DRAGON_ENERGY': no clean cut, 52.2% win

Closest dirty thresholds on cells with no clean rule: 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) Def >= 81.39 (158 spreads on the wrong side); 2v2 Regidrago Atk >= 157.78 (366 spreads on the wrong side); 1v1 Steelix (Shadow) Def >= 82.36 (268 spreads on the wrong side); 0v0 Regidrago Atk >= 159.27 (70 spreads on the wrong side).

band	defense line it selects	cell
[25%, 60%]	81.39	0v0 Snorlax (Shadow)
[25%, 55%]	81.39	0v0 Snorlax (Shadow)
[25%, 50%]	no floor	-
[20%, 60%]	81.39	0v0 Snorlax (Shadow)
[30%, 60%]	81.39	0v0 Snorlax (Shadow)
[25%, 70%]	81.39	0v0 Snorlax (Shadow)

Terms used here

build criteria: Which shield scenarios the ranking counts: all nine equally, the three even ones, or 1v1 alone.
build: A region of the IV grid you can aim at -- every spread that clears the same combination of thresholds, at least fifty of them.
guaranteed: Won by every single spread in the region, not by most of them.
decision matchup: A (shield scenario, opponent) pair the IV choice decides: a top-50 opponent that some spreads on this grid beat and others lose to.
opponent-IV mode: One of the ways every opponent was made for this bake -- PvPoke-default IVs or the bulkiest ones, each with and without the focal side baiting -- so a claim that holds in all of them does not depend on how the opponent was made.
staircase: A rule whose defense floor steps DOWN as HP goes up, so bulk can be spent on either stat: one floor per HP value rather than one floor for all of them.
stat-product rank-1 (SP1): The IV spread with the largest attack x defense x HP at this league's CP cap -- the bulk-first spread most IV tools list first. Written SP1 where it is named repeatedly.
material: A matchup no single-stat threshold of a hundred or more spreads wins more than 95% of the time, so it takes two stats at once to claim it.
stat product: Attack x defense x HP at the league's CP cap, the usual one-number summary of an IV spread.
fork: A second region with no spread in common with the first that wins a noticeably different set of matchups outright -- the two overlap on less than 80% of them -- so they are a real choice rather than two spellings of one.
wide: The looser rule drawn around a region of the grid: it holds every spread that region holds and more, so it wins less for every member but is easier to hit.
bulk box: A rule that is a defense floor and an HP floor and nothing else -- a rectangle on the defense / HP plane.
outside rate: How often the spreads left OUT of a region win the same matchup its own members all win -- one the rest of the grid takes anyway is not what you bought.
charge-move priority (CMP): When both sides throw a charged move on the same turn, the higher attack stat goes first.
contested matchups: The matchups some IV spreads on this grid win and others lose -- the only ones an IV choice can change.
rung: An attack value above the line at which some further matchup flips for every spread that reaches it.
UpSet plot: A bar chart of set intersections: each column is one candidate region, and the dots under it mark which named sets it lies inside (Lex et al. 2014).
bulkpoint: A defense value across which an opponent's damage into you steps down by a whole point, or an HP value across which the number of hits they need to knock you out changes.
one-sided gate: A stat value with one clean side: either nothing below it wins the matchup, or everything at or above it does -- so clearing it is required, or enough, but not both.

Moveset: Switching movesets reloads the page; pasted CSV will need to be re-loaded. Shields: Build criteria: Opponent IVs: Bait: Y-axis: Color: Anchors: Build criteria weights shield scenarios in: Which one to build?, the all-scenarios clusters, and Shields = All (by build criteria). Nothing else on this page is re-weighted by it. Threshold tiers (e.g. GH Great / GH Good) are expert stat-cutoff regions defined in Threshold Tiers below. Hover legend to isolate; click to lock.

Check my collection - Your collection stays in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Paste your Poke Genie CSV export below, or click Choose file… to load one from disk. You’ll see which of your Regidragos (and pre-evolutions) qualify for each tier, overlaid on the scatter plot.

Show only my mons

Or enter one at a time - Atk/Def/HP IVs (0-15), level, shadow flag. Same format as PvPoke / PvPIVs.

Species Atk Def HP Level Shadow

Compare candidates - up to 7 of your IV spreads, side by side: wins, mirror, and the close calls that decide the build

Add a spread: Atk Def HP 0 / 7 added

Highlight IVs:

Top IVs Rows: Ranked by this dive's battle simulation (not fetched from PvPoke). Click any column header to sort.

Battle-Rating Distribution

Per-matchup battle-rating distribution for the reference IV (PvPoke default or Rank 1, matching the Opponent-IVs dropdown) across the opponent pool, under the currently-selected Shields / Opponent-IVs / Bait.

Dragon Breath / Dragon Energy, Vise Grip

IV Recommendations

Moveset: Dragon Breath / Dragon Energy, Vise Grip. Vs PvPoke default opponents.

IV Flavor Guide (Simulation)

Auto-generated from simulation matchup data. Flavor names (e.g. "Premium Bulk", "Fortified {Opp}", "{Opp} Slayer") are derived from which opponents each IV cluster beats, not from the expert-authored Threshold Tiers section above. This IV Flavor Guide and the Threshold Tiers answer different questions and may not line up 1:1. New to flavor cards? The IV Flavor Guide walks through the six name families and the trade-off layout.

Charm-class fast moves typically favor stat product on Regidrago: more attacks in, more fast moves survived, usually outweighs one extra charge-move damage.

In Ultra League, Regidrago has 3 flavors: General Good, Fortified Annihilape, and Regidrago Mirror Atk. In general, the General Good variation may be the flavor of choice, as it plays up Regidrago's potential vs Bellibolt, Lapras, and Malamar (Shadow).

Flavor	IVs	%	Catches needed
General Good [Recommended]	4059	99.1%	almost any will do
Fortified Annihilape	2	0.0%	very rare
Regidrago Mirror Atk	5	0.1%	very rare

General Good (151.55 Atk, 75.73 Def, 294 HP) [Recommended]

75.73 Def and 294 HP is a safe baseline for Regidrago, with an attack floor of 151.55 Atk for coverage against key opponents.

294 HP is also a safe spot, helping secure the mirror and key matchups vs Ampharos, Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist).

76.03 Def with 294+ HP for Ampharos (incl. Shadow) (1v2), Bellibolt (0v1), Cresselia (incl. Shadow) (2v2), Dondozo (1v1), Feraligatr (1v1), Giratina (Altered) (incl. Shadow) (0v1, 2v2), Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2), Malamar (incl. Shadow) (1v1), Seaking (2v2), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (1v0), Lapras (1v0)
76.78 Def with 299+ HP for the Feraligatr (1v1)
76.92 Def for the Guzzlord (2v2 with bait)
77.21 Def for the Empoleon (1v0)
77.35 Def for the Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
77.51 Def with 301+ HP for the Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
78.09 Def with 309+ HP for Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (1v0), Talonflame (1v1)
78.44 Def with 304+ HP for the Snorlax (1v1 no bait)

Fortified Annihilape (87.66 Def, 305 HP)

The "Fortified Annihilape" Regidrago fortifies its bulk to gain several matchups including the Annihilape 2v1, 2v2, the Ampharos 0v1, the Corviknight (Shadow) 2v1. This requires 87.66 Def with 305 HP.

Note: The higher stat requirement will cost several matchups, such as the Corviknight 1v0, Forretress (Bug Bite) 1v0, Melmetal 1v0, among others.

Regidrago Mirror Atk (163.78 Atk, 302 HP)

The "Regidrago Mirror Atk" Regidrago trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Ampharos 0v1, the Clefable 2v0, the Cresselia (Shadow) 0v0. Regidrago would need 163.78 Atk while maintaining 302 HP.

Note: The drop in bulk will cost several matchups, such as the Ampharos (Shadow) 1v2, Bellibolt 0v1, Corviknight 1v0, among others.

Rank-1 Regidrago (0/14/15) meets the General Good thresholds.

Simulation-Derived IV Tiers

Auto-derived from the sim (not expert-authored).

Threshold Tiers

Stat-target headlines from thresholds/*.toml, each grouped with the named anchors its spec clears and the IV spreads that meet it. Within each tier card, bullets are grouped by opponent and sorted by the required stat (Def or Atk) ascending - read top-to-bottom in the order a player would clear them as their stat grows. The flat list of every anchor (regardless of tier) lives in Anchor-Driven Matchup Flips below. New to tier cards? The Threshold Tiers guide walks through what the stat cutoffs and member counts mean. A tier's anchors come from two passes over the anchor list:

Primary bullets - the tier has a cutoff on the anchor's target axis (atk or def) that meets or exceeds the anchor's threshold. Consequences:
- Subset case: if tier A is strictly stricter than tier B on the anchor axis, A's bullet list is a superset of B's. Overlap is intentional.
- Crossed-cutoff case: tier A has only an atk cutoff, tier B has only a def cutoff - neither is a subset of the other. Atk anchors appear only on A; def anchors only on B.
- Slayer-axis IV-count case: two tiers can list the same atk anchor but have different member-IV counts because a stricter tier's def cutoff excludes def-sacrificing spreads that the looser tier keeps. Check the (−N vs parent) callout on the tier header to spot this at a glance.
Anchors we get for free (collapsed) - the tier has no cutoff on the anchor's target axis, but every IV in the tier clears the anchor's threshold anyway. These would be silently dropped by the primary filter; we surface them in a separate collapsed block so the card isn't misleading.

Rillaboom Atk · atk≥163.46 (5 IV spreads) (−31 vs Primarina Atk (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 57 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Clefable, Corviknight, Cramorant, +23 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Rillaboom (2 scenario flips).

155.00 Atk for Corviknight (Dragon Energy) vs Corviknight (1v0)
155.44 Atk for Corviknight (Vise Grip) vs Corviknight (1v0)
154.44 Atk for Melmetal (Dragon Energy) vs Melmetal (1v0)
155.61 Atk for Melmetal (Vise Grip) vs Melmetal (1v0)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Dragon Breath) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Dragon Energy) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
154.30 Atk for Virizion (Vise Grip) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
157.83 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
158.56 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
163.46 Atk for Rillaboom (Dragon Energy) vs Rillaboom (2v2 with bait)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
161.91 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
158.37 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0, 1v1)
158.37 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0, 1v1)
160.66 Atk for Registeel (Dragon Energy) vs Registeel (2v0)
162.40 Atk for Registeel (Vise Grip) vs Registeel (2v0)
156.98 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
156.98 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
157.68 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
162.12 Atk for Forretress (Dragon Energy) vs Forretress (0v0)
151.76 Atk for Regidrago (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
152.08 Atk for Regidrago (Vise Grip) vs Regidrago (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
157.77 Atk for Regidrago (Dragon Breath) vs Regidrago (2v2)
157.58 Atk for Clefable (Dragon Breath) vs Clefable (2v0)
157.58 Atk for Clefable (Dragon Energy) vs Clefable (2v0)
158.28 Atk for Clefable (Vise Grip) vs Clefable (2v0)
151.55 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0, 2v1)
159.62 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
162.86 Atk for Steelix (Dragon Breath) vs Steelix (1v1, 2v1)
162.86 Atk for Steelix (Dragon Energy) vs Steelix (1v1, 2v1)
162.84 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v0)
155.01 Atk for Swampert (Dragon Energy) vs Swampert (1v2)
155.30 Atk for Swampert (Vise Grip) vs Swampert (1v2)
154.61 Atk for Toucannon (Dragon Energy) vs Toucannon (0v0, 2v2)
156.29 Atk for Toucannon (Vise Grip) vs Toucannon (0v0, 2v2)
159.95 Atk for Toucannon (Dragon Breath) vs Toucannon (0v0)
163.07 Atk for Primarina (Dragon Breath) vs Primarina (1v0, 2v1)
163.07 Atk for Primarina (Dragon Energy) vs Primarina (1v0, 2v1)
162.98 Atk for Ampharos (Dragon Energy) vs Ampharos (0v1)
159.80 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
159.80 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
161.63 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
151.75 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Energy) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
159.69 Atk for Feraligatr (Vise Grip) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
157.67 Atk for Cramorant (Dragon Energy) vs Cramorant (1v2 no bait)
157.79 Atk for Cramorant (Vise Grip) vs Cramorant (1v2 no bait)
156.69 Atk for Talonflame (Dragon Energy) vs Talonflame (0v1 no bait)
156.98 Atk for Talonflame (Vise Grip) vs Talonflame (0v1 no bait)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Breath) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Energy) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
152.94 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Vise Grip) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
157.02 Atk for Snorlax (Dragon Energy) vs Snorlax (0v0)
152.58 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Dragon Energy) vs Galarian Moltres (2v2)

Anchors we get for free (55 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

75.84 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
76.01 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
76.23 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Crunch) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
75.84 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
75.91 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
76.17 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
76.21 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Sludge Bomb) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
75.76 Def for Dondozo bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (1v1)
75.82 Def for Dondozo bulk (Outrage) vs Dondozo (1v1)
76.15 Def for Dondozo bulk (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (1v1)
75.88 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
75.97 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
76.05 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
75.86 Def for Seaking bulk (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (2v2)
75.93 Def for Seaking bulk (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (2v2)
76.05 Def for Seaking bulk (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (2v2)
76.10 Def for Seaking bulk (Megahorn) vs Seaking (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Aurora Beam) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Confusion) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Psycho Cut) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
75.82 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
75.85 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
76.05 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
76.07 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Psybeam) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
75.91 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Power Gem) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.00 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.30 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.24 Def for Bellibolt bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Bellibolt (0v1)
76.03 Def + 298 HP for Snorlax bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
76.07 Def + 298 HP for Snorlax bulk (Superpower) vs Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
76.12 Def + 298 HP for Snorlax bulk (Outrage) vs Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
76.22 Def + 298 HP for Snorlax bulk (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
76.24 Def + 298 HP for Snorlax bulk (Heavy Slam) vs Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
75.86 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Psychic) vs Florges (1v0)
75.89 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v0)
76.03 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (1v0)
75.73 Def for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.76 Def + 293 HP for Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.81 Def for Lapras bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.98 Def for Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v0)
76.01 Def for Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v0)
76.01 Def for Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.88 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.90 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.92 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
76.01 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
76.04 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.75 Def + 319 HP for Deoxys Defense bulk (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v2)
75.73 Def + 321 HP for Seismitoad bulk (Icy Wind) vs Seismitoad (1v1 with bait)
76.20 Def + 321 HP for Seismitoad bulk (Earth Power) vs Seismitoad (1v1 with bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

154.45 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [3642 IVs]
157.48 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [2062 IVs]

Member IVs (5)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/0/0 👑	163.86	76.62	303	#2362	+0	-13.4	-33.5	-23.4
15/0/3 👑	163.98	76.32	304	#2831	+0	-19.6	-33.3	-23.0
15/0/1	163.98	76.32	303	#2970	+0	-19.8	-33.7	-23.8
15/0/2	163.98	76.32	303	#2971	+0	-19.8	-33.7	-23.8
15/0/0	163.98	76.32	302	#3581	+0	-23.6	-34.8	-25.9

Fortified Annihilape · def≥87.66, hp≥305 (2 IV spreads) (−4082 vs General (def-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 268 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Annihilape, Bellibolt, +34 more. Matchup flips vs Corviknight (Shadow), Dondozo (2 scenarios, 8 IVs).

78.71 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v1)
78.73 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v1)
78.81 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Superpower) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v1)
78.89 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v1)
78.89 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Zen Headbutt) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0)
78.89 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Outrage) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v1)
79.07 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v1)
79.09 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v1)
81.35 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Lick) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v1)
81.35 Def for Shadow Snorlax (Psywave) vs Shadow Snorlax (0v0, 1v1)
81.00 Def + 307 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Payback) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v1)
81.22 Def + 307 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v1)
81.31 Def + 307 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Sky Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v1)
81.48 Def + 307 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Air Cutter) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v1)
82.09 Def + 317 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Steel Wing) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v1)
82.93 Def + 312 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Air Slash) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v1)
81.94 Def + 306 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Outrage) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1, 1v2)
82.09 Def + 306 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Earthquake) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1, 1v2)
82.09 Def + 306 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Bulldoze) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1, 1v2)
82.16 Def + 306 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Hyper Beam) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1, 1v2)
82.62 Def + 306 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Crunch) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1, 1v2)
83.80 Def + 308 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Bite) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
83.80 Def + 308 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Zen Headbutt) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
85.18 Def + 307 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Tail) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v1)
76.76 Def + 297 HP for Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Empoleon (1v0, 1v1)
76.77 Def + 295 HP for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (1v0, 1v1)
76.81 Def + 293 HP for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (1v0, 1v1)
77.02 Def + 293 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (1v0, 1v1)
77.17 Def + 295 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (1v0, 1v1)
78.95 Def + 295 HP for Empoleon (Metal Claw) vs Empoleon (1v0, 1v1)
78.95 Def + 295 HP for Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Empoleon (1v0, 1v1)
78.95 Def + 295 HP for Empoleon (Metal Sound) vs Empoleon (1v0, 1v1)
80.39 Def for Empoleon (Steel Wing) vs Empoleon (1v0)
76.03 Def + 295 HP for Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Snorlax (1v1)
76.07 Def + 296 HP for Snorlax (Superpower) vs Snorlax (1v1)
76.12 Def + 294 HP for Snorlax (Outrage) vs Snorlax (1v1)
76.22 Def + 296 HP for Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (1v1)
76.24 Def + 295 HP for Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Snorlax (1v1)
76.39 Def + 296 HP for Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Snorlax (1v1)
76.64 Def + 297 HP for Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Snorlax (1v1)
80.35 Def + 303 HP for Snorlax (Zen Headbutt) vs Snorlax (1v1 no bait)
75.86 Def + 311 HP for Florges (Psychic) vs Florges (1v0, 2v0)
75.89 Def + 311 HP for Florges (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v0, 2v0)
76.03 Def + 311 HP for Florges (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (1v0, 2v0)
76.49 Def + 311 HP for Florges (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (1v0, 2v0)
76.63 Def + 311 HP for Florges (Chilling Water) vs Florges (1v0)
76.75 Def + 312 HP for Florges (Trailblaze) vs Florges (1v0, 2v0)
76.90 Def + 322 HP for Florges (Fairy Wind) vs Florges (1v0)
78.23 Def + 322 HP for Florges (Vine Whip) vs Florges (1v0)
80.46 Def + 317 HP for Florges (Razor Leaf) vs Florges (1v0)
80.62 Def + 313 HP for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
80.66 Def + 313 HP for Galarian Moltres (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
80.96 Def + 313 HP for Galarian Moltres (Ancient Power) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
81.10 Def + 313 HP for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
83.28 Def + 315 HP for Galarian Moltres (Wing Attack) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
84.79 Def for Galarian Moltres (Sucker Punch) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
81.22 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
81.24 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
81.26 Def + 298 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
81.86 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
82.77 Def + 301 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Bite) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
82.77 Def + 301 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
83.64 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Ice Fang) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
85.35 Def for Shadow Feraligatr (Waterfall) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
75.84 Def + 301 HP for Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
76.01 Def + 300 HP for Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
76.23 Def + 302 HP for Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
76.64 Def + 302 HP for Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
77.59 Def + 317 HP for Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
77.59 Def + 317 HP for Feraligatr (Water Gun) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
77.59 Def + 301 HP for Feraligatr (Waterfall) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
77.90 Def + 307 HP for Feraligatr (Ice Fang) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
81.22 Def + 300 HP for Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v0, 0v1)
81.39 Def + 298 HP for Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v0, 0v1)
81.96 Def + 304 HP for Giratina Altered (Ancient Power) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v0, 0v1)
81.96 Def + 304 HP for Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v0, 0v1)
83.93 Def for Giratina Altered (Dragon Breath) vs Giratina (Altered) (0v0)
75.84 Def + 311 HP for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
75.91 Def + 311 HP for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
76.17 Def + 311 HP for Guzzlord (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
76.21 Def + 312 HP for Guzzlord (Sludge Bomb) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
77.60 Def + 315 HP for Guzzlord (Dragon Tail) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
80.84 Def + 315 HP for Guzzlord (Snarl) vs Guzzlord (2v2 no bait)
81.36 Def + 301 HP for Rillaboom (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (1v1, 1v2)
81.63 Def + 298 HP for Rillaboom (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (1v1, 1v2)
81.63 Def + 298 HP for Rillaboom (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (1v1, 1v2)
81.96 Def + 294 HP for Rillaboom (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (1v1, 1v2)
82.08 Def + 302 HP for Rillaboom (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (1v1, 1v2)
82.99 Def for Rillaboom (Scratch) vs Rillaboom (1v1)
82.99 Def for Rillaboom (Razor Leaf) vs Rillaboom (1v1)
75.73 Def + 309 HP for Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0, 1v1, 2v2)
75.76 Def + 293 HP for Lapras (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v0, 1v1, 2v2)
75.81 Def + 295 HP for Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v0, 1v1, 2v2)
75.98 Def + 295 HP for Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v0, 1v1, 2v2)
76.01 Def + 295 HP for Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v0, 1v1, 2v2)
76.01 Def + 295 HP for Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v0, 1v1, 2v2)
76.54 Def + 295 HP for Lapras (Surf) vs Lapras (1v0, 1v1, 2v2)
83.61 Def + 314 HP for Lapras (Ice Shard) vs Lapras (1v1 with bait)
83.61 Def + 314 HP for Lapras (Frost Breath) vs Lapras (1v1 with bait)
87.09 Def for Lapras (Psywave) vs Lapras (1v1, 2v2)
75.88 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.90 Def + 301 HP for Shadow Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.92 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Lapras (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
76.01 Def + 301 HP for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
76.04 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
76.34 Def + 301 HP for Shadow Lapras (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
76.47 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
78.03 Def + 308 HP for Shadow Lapras (Frost Breath) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
78.38 Def + 319 HP for Shadow Lapras (Psywave) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
78.38 Def + 319 HP for Shadow Lapras (Water Gun) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
78.52 Def + 310 HP for Shadow Lapras (Ice Shard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
79.20 Def + 294 HP for Dusknoir (Shadow Punch) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
79.33 Def + 308 HP for Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
79.33 Def + 295 HP for Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
79.47 Def + 295 HP for Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
79.68 Def + 308 HP for Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
79.68 Def + 308 HP for Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
79.68 Def + 310 HP for Dusknoir (Astonish) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
80.28 Def + 308 HP for Dusknoir (Ominous Wind) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
75.76 Def + 303 HP for Dondozo (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (1v1, 1v2)
75.82 Def + 303 HP for Dondozo (Outrage) vs Dondozo (1v1, 1v2)
76.15 Def + 304 HP for Dondozo (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (1v1, 1v2)
76.49 Def + 305 HP for Dondozo (Surf) vs Dondozo (1v1, 1v2)
79.77 Def + 317 HP for Dondozo (Waterfall) vs Dondozo (1v2 with bait)
80.94 Def + 316 HP for Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Forretress (2v1)
81.20 Def + 305 HP for Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (1v1, 2v1)
81.31 Def + 305 HP for Forretress (Earthquake) vs Forretress (1v1, 2v1)
81.57 Def + 314 HP for Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Forretress (2v1)
82.42 Def + 315 HP for Forretress (Volt Switch) vs Forretress (2v1)
82.42 Def + 314 HP for Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Forretress (2v1)
75.88 Def + 298 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
75.97 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
76.05 Def + 298 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
76.57 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Ancient Power) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
77.19 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
77.19 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
80.44 Def + 300 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
80.44 Def + 300 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
80.48 Def + 298 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
80.69 Def + 299 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
80.69 Def + 299 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
80.69 Def + 301 HP for Alolan Muk (Acid Spray) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
81.90 Def + 303 HP for Alolan Muk (Poison Jab) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
83.57 Def + 301 HP for Alolan Muk (Snarl) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
78.24 Def + 302 HP for Talonflame (Fire Spin) vs Talonflame (1v1, 1v2)
78.24 Def + 312 HP for Talonflame (Incinerate) vs Talonflame (1v1, 1v2)
78.24 Def + 302 HP for Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Talonflame (1v1, 1v2)
78.24 Def + 302 HP for Talonflame (Fire Blast) vs Talonflame (1v1, 1v2)
78.24 Def + 302 HP for Talonflame (Flame Charge) vs Talonflame (1v1, 1v2)
78.24 Def + 302 HP for Talonflame (Hurricane) vs Talonflame (1v1, 1v2)
78.24 Def + 304 HP for Talonflame (Fly) vs Talonflame (1v1, 1v2)
83.46 Def + 308 HP for Talonflame (Peck) vs Talonflame (1v1, 1v2)
79.70 Def + 298 HP for Shadow Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
79.78 Def + 295 HP for Shadow Forretress (Earthquake) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
79.78 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
79.97 Def + 298 HP for Shadow Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
80.46 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
81.38 Def + 301 HP for Shadow Forretress (Struggle Bug) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
82.42 Def for Shadow Forretress (Volt Switch) vs Shadow Forretress (0v0)
80.66 Def + 295 HP for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (1v0)
80.91 Def + 302 HP for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (1v0)
81.02 Def + 295 HP for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (1v0)
81.02 Def + 306 HP for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (1v0)
83.76 Def for Walrein (Powder Snow) vs Walrein (1v0)
84.69 Def for Walrein (Frost Breath) vs Walrein (1v0)
75.75 Def + 302 HP for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 1v2)
76.50 Def + 298 HP for Deoxys Defense (Rock Slide) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 1v2)
76.81 Def + 298 HP for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 1v2)
81.27 Def + 307 HP for Deoxys Defense (Zen Headbutt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 1v2)
84.66 Def for Deoxys Defense (Counter) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 1v2)
84.66 Def for Deoxys Defense (Low Kick) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 1v2)
84.54 Def + 305 HP for Runerigus (Brutal Swing) vs Runerigus (2v2)
85.00 Def + 305 HP for Runerigus (Sand Tomb) vs Runerigus (2v2)
85.06 Def + 305 HP for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (2v2)
85.09 Def + 305 HP for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (2v2)
85.77 Def + 306 HP for Runerigus (Astonish) vs Runerigus (2v2)
85.77 Def + 306 HP for Runerigus (Shadow Claw) vs Runerigus (2v2)
81.26 Def + 300 HP for Steelix (Breaking Swipe) vs Steelix (2v1)
81.31 Def + 300 HP for Steelix (Heavy Slam) vs Steelix (2v1)
81.71 Def + 298 HP for Steelix (Earthquake) vs Steelix (2v1)
82.28 Def + 303 HP for Steelix (Thunder Fang) vs Steelix (2v1)
82.28 Def + 298 HP for Steelix (Crunch) vs Steelix (2v1)
82.28 Def + 300 HP for Steelix (Psychic Fangs) vs Steelix (2v1)
82.28 Def + 303 HP for Steelix (Iron Tail) vs Steelix (2v1)
84.63 Def + 298 HP for Steelix (Dragon Tail) vs Steelix (2v1)
75.86 Def for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (2v2)
75.93 Def for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (2v2)
76.05 Def for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (2v2)
76.10 Def for Seaking (Megahorn) vs Seaking (2v2)
76.47 Def for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (2v2)
77.83 Def for Seaking (Peck) vs Seaking (2v2)
77.83 Def for Seaking (Waterfall) vs Seaking (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia (Confusion) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia (Psycho Cut) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
80.52 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Steelix (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1, 1v2)
80.60 Def + 298 HP for Shadow Steelix (Psychic Fangs) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1, 1v2)
80.60 Def + 298 HP for Shadow Steelix (Breaking Swipe) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1, 1v2)
80.78 Def + 296 HP for Shadow Steelix (Earthquake) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1, 1v2)
81.31 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Steelix (Crunch) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1, 1v2)
82.28 Def for Shadow Steelix (Thunder Fang) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1, 1v2)
83.64 Def for Shadow Steelix (Dragon Tail) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1, 1v2)
84.63 Def for Shadow Steelix (Iron Tail) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1, 1v2)
78.51 Def + 300 HP for Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Ampharos (0v1)
78.59 Def + 303 HP for Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Ampharos (0v1)
78.61 Def + 304 HP for Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (0v1)
78.64 Def + 301 HP for Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (0v1)
78.66 Def + 301 HP for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (0v1)
78.77 Def + 300 HP for Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (0v1)
79.03 Def + 304 HP for Ampharos (Thunder) vs Ampharos (0v1)
79.10 Def + 304 HP for Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Ampharos (0v1)
79.82 Def + 315 HP for Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Ampharos (0v1)
79.82 Def + 315 HP for Ampharos (Charge Beam) vs Ampharos (0v1)
81.08 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2)
81.08 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Cradily (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2)
81.19 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2)
81.41 Def + 296 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2)
81.41 Def + 296 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2)
82.09 Def for Shadow Cradily (Acid) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2)
82.09 Def for Shadow Cradily (Bullet Seed) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2)
84.20 Def + 299 HP for Shadow Cradily (Infestation) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
75.82 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1, 2v2)
75.85 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1, 2v2)
76.05 Def + 296 HP for Shadow Malamar (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1, 2v2)
76.07 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Malamar (Psybeam) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1, 2v2)
85.42 Def for Shadow Malamar (Psywave) vs Shadow Malamar (2v2)
75.91 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.00 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.30 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.35 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.63 Def for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
81.00 Def + 296 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Hurricane) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
81.03 Def + 296 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
81.14 Def + 296 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Fire Blast) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
81.20 Def + 296 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Fly) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
81.37 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Flame Charge) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
81.64 Def + 303 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Incinerate) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
81.94 Def + 302 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Peck) vs Shadow Talonflame (0v0)
76.24 Def + 306 HP for Bellibolt (Zap Cannon) vs Bellibolt (0v1, 1v2)
76.34 Def + 307 HP for Bellibolt (Discharge) vs Bellibolt (0v1, 1v2)
76.55 Def + 306 HP for Bellibolt (Parabolic Charge) vs Bellibolt (0v1, 1v2)
76.98 Def + 308 HP for Bellibolt (Sucker Punch) vs Bellibolt (0v1, 1v2)
75.73 Def + 301 HP for Seismitoad (Icy Wind) vs Seismitoad (1v1 with bait)
76.20 Def + 301 HP for Seismitoad (Earth Power) vs Seismitoad (1v1 with bait)
76.33 Def + 301 HP for Seismitoad (Sludge Bomb) vs Seismitoad (1v1 with bait)
77.35 Def + 301 HP for Seismitoad (Muddy Water) vs Seismitoad (1v1 with bait)
82.10 Def + 300 HP for Annihilape (Shadow Ball) vs Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
82.16 Def + 302 HP for Annihilape (Close Combat) vs Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
82.21 Def + 304 HP for Annihilape (Rage Fist) vs Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
82.71 Def + 296 HP for Annihilape (Ice Punch) vs Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
82.71 Def + 311 HP for Annihilape (Low Kick) vs Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
82.71 Def + 311 HP for Annihilape (Counter) vs Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
82.71 Def + 296 HP for Annihilape (Low Sweep) vs Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
83.37 Def + 309 HP for Annihilape (Night Slash) vs Annihilape (2v1, 2v2)
80.38 Def + 299 HP for Regidrago (Outrage) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
80.38 Def + 299 HP for Regidrago (Breaking Swipe) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
80.38 Def + 299 HP for Regidrago (Dragon Pulse) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
80.38 Def + 299 HP for Regidrago (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
80.60 Def + 299 HP for Regidrago (Hyper Beam) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
80.85 Def + 299 HP for Regidrago (Vise Grip) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
82.68 Def + 300 HP for Regidrago (Dragon Breath) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
82.33 Def + 299 HP for Toucannon (Rock Blast) vs Toucannon (1v1)
82.33 Def + 299 HP for Toucannon (Flash Cannon) vs Toucannon (1v1)

Anchors we get for free (9 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

151.76 Atk for Regidrago (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (1v1 with bait)
152.08 Atk for Regidrago (Vise Grip) vs Regidrago (1v1 with bait)
151.75 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Breath) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Energy) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
152.58 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Dragon Energy) vs Galarian Moltres (2v2)
151.55 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Walrein (2v1)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

83.41 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (1v0) [1227 IVs]

Member IVs (2)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
0/15/5 👑	152.65	87.66	306	#23	+10	+0.6	+2.7	-8.0
0/15/4	152.65	87.66	305	#47	+8	-0.4	+2.1	-8.7

Primarina Atk · atk≥163.07 (36 IV spreads) (−3 vs Steelix Atk (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 56 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Clefable, Corviknight, Cramorant, +22 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Primarina (6 scenario flips).

155.00 Atk for Corviknight (Dragon Energy) vs Corviknight (1v0)
155.44 Atk for Corviknight (Vise Grip) vs Corviknight (1v0)
154.44 Atk for Melmetal (Dragon Energy) vs Melmetal (1v0)
155.61 Atk for Melmetal (Vise Grip) vs Melmetal (1v0)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Dragon Breath) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Dragon Energy) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
154.30 Atk for Virizion (Vise Grip) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
157.83 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
158.56 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
161.91 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
158.37 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0, 1v1)
158.37 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0, 1v1)
160.66 Atk for Registeel (Dragon Energy) vs Registeel (2v0)
162.40 Atk for Registeel (Vise Grip) vs Registeel (2v0)
156.98 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
156.98 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
157.68 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
162.12 Atk for Forretress (Dragon Energy) vs Forretress (0v0)
151.76 Atk for Regidrago (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
152.08 Atk for Regidrago (Vise Grip) vs Regidrago (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
157.77 Atk for Regidrago (Dragon Breath) vs Regidrago (2v2)
157.58 Atk for Clefable (Dragon Breath) vs Clefable (2v0)
157.58 Atk for Clefable (Dragon Energy) vs Clefable (2v0)
158.28 Atk for Clefable (Vise Grip) vs Clefable (2v0)
151.55 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0, 2v1)
159.62 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
162.86 Atk for Steelix (Dragon Breath) vs Steelix (1v1, 2v1)
162.86 Atk for Steelix (Dragon Energy) vs Steelix (1v1, 2v1)
162.84 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v0)
155.01 Atk for Swampert (Dragon Energy) vs Swampert (1v2)
155.30 Atk for Swampert (Vise Grip) vs Swampert (1v2)
154.61 Atk for Toucannon (Dragon Energy) vs Toucannon (0v0, 2v2)
156.29 Atk for Toucannon (Vise Grip) vs Toucannon (0v0, 2v2)
159.95 Atk for Toucannon (Dragon Breath) vs Toucannon (0v0)
163.07 Atk for Primarina (Dragon Breath) vs Primarina (1v0, 2v1)
163.07 Atk for Primarina (Dragon Energy) vs Primarina (1v0, 2v1)
162.98 Atk for Ampharos (Dragon Energy) vs Ampharos (0v1)
159.80 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
159.80 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
161.63 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
151.75 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Energy) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
159.69 Atk for Feraligatr (Vise Grip) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
157.67 Atk for Cramorant (Dragon Energy) vs Cramorant (1v2 no bait)
157.79 Atk for Cramorant (Vise Grip) vs Cramorant (1v2 no bait)
156.69 Atk for Talonflame (Dragon Energy) vs Talonflame (0v1 no bait)
156.98 Atk for Talonflame (Vise Grip) vs Talonflame (0v1 no bait)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Breath) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Energy) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
152.94 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Vise Grip) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
157.02 Atk for Snorlax (Dragon Energy) vs Snorlax (0v0)
152.58 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Dragon Energy) vs Galarian Moltres (2v2)

Anchors we get for free (31 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

75.84 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
76.01 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
75.84 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
75.91 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
75.76 Def for Dondozo bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (1v1)
75.82 Def for Dondozo bulk (Outrage) vs Dondozo (1v1)
75.88 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
75.97 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
75.86 Def for Seaking bulk (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (2v2)
75.93 Def for Seaking bulk (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (2v2)
75.82 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
75.85 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
75.91 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Power Gem) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.00 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
75.86 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Psychic) vs Florges (1v0)
75.89 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v0)
75.73 Def for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.76 Def for Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.81 Def for Lapras bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.98 Def for Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v0)
76.01 Def for Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v0)
76.01 Def for Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.88 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.90 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.92 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
76.01 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.75 Def + 319 HP for Deoxys Defense bulk (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v2)
75.73 Def + 321 HP for Seismitoad bulk (Icy Wind) vs Seismitoad (1v1 with bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

154.45 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [3642 IVs]
157.48 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [2062 IVs]

Member IVs (36)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/0/4 👑	163.11	76.62	306	#1597	+0	-10.6	-31.5	-23.9
13/1/0 👑	163.11	77.38	303	#1735	+0	-13.3	-33.2	-22.3
14/1/3 👑	163.23	77.08	304	#1817	+0	-13.6	-31.7	-24.1
15/2/0 👑	163.34	77.53	301	#2052	+0	-13.6	-34.0	-23.0
15/2/1 👑	163.34	77.53	301	#2053	+0	-13.6	-34.0	-23.0
14/0/5	163.23	76.32	306	#2071	+0	-14.1	-32.0	-24.1
14/0/6	163.23	76.32	306	#2072	+0	-14.1	-32.0	-24.1
14/0/7 👑	163.23	76.32	307	#2118	+0	-15.5	-31.2	-25.2
14/0/0 👑	163.86	76.62	303	#2362	+0	-13.4	-33.5	-23.4
14/1/1	163.23	77.08	303	#2388	+0	-14.4	-34.7	-24.9
14/1/2	163.23	77.08	303	#2389	+0	-14.4	-34.7	-24.9
15/0/8 👑	163.34	76.03	307	#2507	+0	-15.7	-33.5	-25.2
15/0/9 👑	163.34	76.03	307	#2508	+0	-15.7	-33.5	-25.2
13/0/3	163.11	76.62	305	#2551	+0	-14.5	-34.0	-24.5
14/1/0	163.23	77.08	302	#2579	+0	-14.7	-35.1	-25.6
14/0/4	163.23	76.32	305	#2774	+0	-15.6	-34.8	-24.6
15/0/3 👑	163.98	76.32	304	#2831	+0	-19.6	-33.3	-23.0
15/1/4 👑	163.34	76.78	304	#2853	+0	-15.1	-35.0	-25.2
15/1/5 👑	163.34	76.78	304	#2854	+0	-15.1	-35.0	-25.2
15/0/1	163.98	76.32	303	#2970	+0	-19.8	-33.7	-23.8
15/0/2	163.98	76.32	303	#2971	+0	-19.8	-33.7	-23.8
13/0/1	163.11	76.62	304	#2972	+0	-15.8	-35.2	-25.4
13/0/2	163.11	76.62	304	#2973	+0	-15.8	-35.2	-25.4
15/1/3	163.34	76.78	303	#3004	+0	-15.3	-35.6	-25.9
13/0/0	163.11	76.62	303	#3074	+0	-15.6	-35.8	-26.0
15/0/7	163.34	76.03	306	#3219	+0	-16.2	-36.0	-26.9
15/0/6	163.34	76.03	305	#3417	+0	-16.8	-37.0	-27.6
14/0/3	163.23	76.32	304	#3449	+0	-21.9	-35.6	-25.6
14/0/1	163.23	76.32	303	#3561	+0	-22.1	-36.0	-26.3
14/0/2	163.23	76.32	303	#3562	+0	-22.1	-36.0	-26.3
15/0/0	163.98	76.32	302	#3581	+0	-23.6	-34.8	-25.9
15/1/2	163.34	76.78	302	#3622	+0	-23.1	-36.1	-26.7
15/1/0	163.34	76.78	301	#3881	+0	-24.0	-37.2	-28.8
15/1/1	163.34	76.78	301	#3882	+0	-24.0	-37.2	-28.8
15/0/4	163.34	76.03	304	#3888	+0	-23.7	-38.2	-28.2
15/0/5	163.34	76.03	304	#3889	+0	-23.7	-38.2	-28.2

Ampharos Atk · atk≥162.98 (36 IV spreads) (−3 vs Steelix Atk (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 54 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Clefable, Corviknight, Cramorant, +21 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Ampharos (2 scenario flips).

155.00 Atk for Corviknight (Dragon Energy) vs Corviknight (1v0)
155.44 Atk for Corviknight (Vise Grip) vs Corviknight (1v0)
154.44 Atk for Melmetal (Dragon Energy) vs Melmetal (1v0)
155.61 Atk for Melmetal (Vise Grip) vs Melmetal (1v0)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Dragon Breath) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Dragon Energy) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
154.30 Atk for Virizion (Vise Grip) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
157.83 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
158.56 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
161.91 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
158.37 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0, 1v1)
158.37 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0, 1v1)
160.66 Atk for Registeel (Dragon Energy) vs Registeel (2v0)
162.40 Atk for Registeel (Vise Grip) vs Registeel (2v0)
156.98 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
156.98 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
157.68 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
162.12 Atk for Forretress (Dragon Energy) vs Forretress (0v0)
151.76 Atk for Regidrago (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
152.08 Atk for Regidrago (Vise Grip) vs Regidrago (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
157.77 Atk for Regidrago (Dragon Breath) vs Regidrago (2v2)
157.58 Atk for Clefable (Dragon Breath) vs Clefable (2v0)
157.58 Atk for Clefable (Dragon Energy) vs Clefable (2v0)
158.28 Atk for Clefable (Vise Grip) vs Clefable (2v0)
151.55 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0, 2v1)
159.62 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
162.86 Atk for Steelix (Dragon Breath) vs Steelix (1v1, 2v1)
162.86 Atk for Steelix (Dragon Energy) vs Steelix (1v1, 2v1)
162.84 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v0)
155.01 Atk for Swampert (Dragon Energy) vs Swampert (1v2)
155.30 Atk for Swampert (Vise Grip) vs Swampert (1v2)
154.61 Atk for Toucannon (Dragon Energy) vs Toucannon (0v0, 2v2)
156.29 Atk for Toucannon (Vise Grip) vs Toucannon (0v0, 2v2)
159.95 Atk for Toucannon (Dragon Breath) vs Toucannon (0v0)
162.98 Atk for Ampharos (Dragon Energy) vs Ampharos (0v1)
159.80 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
159.80 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
161.63 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
151.75 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Energy) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
159.69 Atk for Feraligatr (Vise Grip) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
157.67 Atk for Cramorant (Dragon Energy) vs Cramorant (1v2 no bait)
157.79 Atk for Cramorant (Vise Grip) vs Cramorant (1v2 no bait)
156.69 Atk for Talonflame (Dragon Energy) vs Talonflame (0v1 no bait)
156.98 Atk for Talonflame (Vise Grip) vs Talonflame (0v1 no bait)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Breath) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Energy) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
152.94 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Vise Grip) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
157.02 Atk for Snorlax (Dragon Energy) vs Snorlax (0v0)
152.58 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Dragon Energy) vs Galarian Moltres (2v2)

Anchors we get for free (31 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

75.84 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
76.01 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
75.84 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
75.91 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
75.76 Def for Dondozo bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (1v1)
75.82 Def for Dondozo bulk (Outrage) vs Dondozo (1v1)
75.88 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
75.97 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
75.86 Def for Seaking bulk (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (2v2)
75.93 Def for Seaking bulk (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (2v2)
75.82 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
75.85 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
75.91 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Power Gem) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.00 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
75.86 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Psychic) vs Florges (1v0)
75.89 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v0)
75.73 Def for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.76 Def for Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.81 Def for Lapras bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.98 Def for Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v0)
76.01 Def for Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v0)
76.01 Def for Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.88 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.90 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.92 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
76.01 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.75 Def + 319 HP for Deoxys Defense bulk (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v2)
75.73 Def + 321 HP for Seismitoad bulk (Icy Wind) vs Seismitoad (1v1 with bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

154.45 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [3642 IVs]
162.97 Atk flips Primarina (1v0, 2v1) [39 IVs]
157.48 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [2062 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Primarina (1v0, 2v1)

Member IVs (36)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/0/4 👑	163.11	76.62	306	#1597	+0	-10.6	-31.5	-23.9
13/1/0 👑	163.11	77.38	303	#1735	+0	-13.3	-33.2	-22.3
14/1/3 👑	163.23	77.08	304	#1817	+0	-13.6	-31.7	-24.1
15/2/0 👑	163.34	77.53	301	#2052	+0	-13.6	-34.0	-23.0
15/2/1 👑	163.34	77.53	301	#2053	+0	-13.6	-34.0	-23.0
14/0/5	163.23	76.32	306	#2071	+0	-14.1	-32.0	-24.1
14/0/6	163.23	76.32	306	#2072	+0	-14.1	-32.0	-24.1
14/0/7 👑	163.23	76.32	307	#2118	+0	-15.5	-31.2	-25.2
14/0/0 👑	163.86	76.62	303	#2362	+0	-13.4	-33.5	-23.4
14/1/1	163.23	77.08	303	#2388	+0	-14.4	-34.7	-24.9
14/1/2	163.23	77.08	303	#2389	+0	-14.4	-34.7	-24.9
15/0/8 👑	163.34	76.03	307	#2507	+0	-15.7	-33.5	-25.2
15/0/9 👑	163.34	76.03	307	#2508	+0	-15.7	-33.5	-25.2
13/0/3	163.11	76.62	305	#2551	+0	-14.5	-34.0	-24.5
14/1/0	163.23	77.08	302	#2579	+0	-14.7	-35.1	-25.6
14/0/4	163.23	76.32	305	#2774	+0	-15.6	-34.8	-24.6
15/0/3 👑	163.98	76.32	304	#2831	+0	-19.6	-33.3	-23.0
15/1/4 👑	163.34	76.78	304	#2853	+0	-15.1	-35.0	-25.2
15/1/5 👑	163.34	76.78	304	#2854	+0	-15.1	-35.0	-25.2
15/0/1	163.98	76.32	303	#2970	+0	-19.8	-33.7	-23.8
15/0/2	163.98	76.32	303	#2971	+0	-19.8	-33.7	-23.8
13/0/1	163.11	76.62	304	#2972	+0	-15.8	-35.2	-25.4
13/0/2	163.11	76.62	304	#2973	+0	-15.8	-35.2	-25.4
15/1/3	163.34	76.78	303	#3004	+0	-15.3	-35.6	-25.9
13/0/0	163.11	76.62	303	#3074	+0	-15.6	-35.8	-26.0
15/0/7	163.34	76.03	306	#3219	+0	-16.2	-36.0	-26.9
15/0/6	163.34	76.03	305	#3417	+0	-16.8	-37.0	-27.6
14/0/3	163.23	76.32	304	#3449	+0	-21.9	-35.6	-25.6
14/0/1	163.23	76.32	303	#3561	+0	-22.1	-36.0	-26.3
14/0/2	163.23	76.32	303	#3562	+0	-22.1	-36.0	-26.3
15/0/0	163.98	76.32	302	#3581	+0	-23.6	-34.8	-25.9
15/1/2	163.34	76.78	302	#3622	+0	-23.1	-36.1	-26.7
15/1/0	163.34	76.78	301	#3881	+0	-24.0	-37.2	-28.8
15/1/1	163.34	76.78	301	#3882	+0	-24.0	-37.2	-28.8
15/0/4	163.34	76.03	304	#3888	+0	-23.7	-38.2	-28.2
15/0/5	163.34	76.03	304	#3889	+0	-23.7	-38.2	-28.2

Steelix Atk · atk≥162.86 (39 IV spreads) (−4045 vs General (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 53 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Clefable, Corviknight, Cramorant, Shadow Cresselia, +20 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Steelix (4 scenario flips).

155.00 Atk for Corviknight (Dragon Energy) vs Corviknight (1v0)
155.44 Atk for Corviknight (Vise Grip) vs Corviknight (1v0)
154.44 Atk for Melmetal (Dragon Energy) vs Melmetal (1v0)
155.61 Atk for Melmetal (Vise Grip) vs Melmetal (1v0)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Dragon Breath) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Dragon Energy) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
154.30 Atk for Virizion (Vise Grip) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
157.83 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
158.56 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
161.91 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
158.37 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0, 1v1)
158.37 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0, 1v1)
160.66 Atk for Registeel (Dragon Energy) vs Registeel (2v0)
162.40 Atk for Registeel (Vise Grip) vs Registeel (2v0)
156.98 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
156.98 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
157.68 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
162.12 Atk for Forretress (Dragon Energy) vs Forretress (0v0)
151.76 Atk for Regidrago (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
152.08 Atk for Regidrago (Vise Grip) vs Regidrago (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
157.77 Atk for Regidrago (Dragon Breath) vs Regidrago (2v2)
157.58 Atk for Clefable (Dragon Breath) vs Clefable (2v0)
157.58 Atk for Clefable (Dragon Energy) vs Clefable (2v0)
158.28 Atk for Clefable (Vise Grip) vs Clefable (2v0)
151.55 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0, 2v1)
159.62 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
162.86 Atk for Steelix (Dragon Breath) vs Steelix (1v1, 2v1)
162.86 Atk for Steelix (Dragon Energy) vs Steelix (1v1, 2v1)
162.84 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v0)
155.01 Atk for Swampert (Dragon Energy) vs Swampert (1v2)
155.30 Atk for Swampert (Vise Grip) vs Swampert (1v2)
154.61 Atk for Toucannon (Dragon Energy) vs Toucannon (0v0, 2v2)
156.29 Atk for Toucannon (Vise Grip) vs Toucannon (0v0, 2v2)
159.95 Atk for Toucannon (Dragon Breath) vs Toucannon (0v0)
159.80 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
159.80 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
161.63 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
151.75 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Energy) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
159.69 Atk for Feraligatr (Vise Grip) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
157.67 Atk for Cramorant (Dragon Energy) vs Cramorant (1v2 no bait)
157.79 Atk for Cramorant (Vise Grip) vs Cramorant (1v2 no bait)
156.69 Atk for Talonflame (Dragon Energy) vs Talonflame (0v1 no bait)
156.98 Atk for Talonflame (Vise Grip) vs Talonflame (0v1 no bait)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Breath) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Energy) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
152.94 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Vise Grip) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
157.02 Atk for Snorlax (Dragon Energy) vs Snorlax (0v0)
152.58 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Dragon Energy) vs Galarian Moltres (2v2)

Anchors we get for free (31 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

75.84 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
76.01 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
75.84 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
75.91 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
75.76 Def for Dondozo bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (1v1)
75.82 Def for Dondozo bulk (Outrage) vs Dondozo (1v1)
75.88 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
75.97 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
75.86 Def for Seaking bulk (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (2v2)
75.93 Def for Seaking bulk (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (2v2)
75.82 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
75.85 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
75.91 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Power Gem) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.00 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
75.86 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Psychic) vs Florges (1v0)
75.89 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v0)
75.73 Def for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.76 Def for Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.81 Def for Lapras bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.98 Def for Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v0)
76.01 Def for Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v0)
76.01 Def for Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.88 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.90 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.92 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
76.01 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.75 Def + 319 HP for Deoxys Defense bulk (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v2)
75.73 Def + 321 HP for Seismitoad bulk (Icy Wind) vs Seismitoad (1v1 with bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

154.45 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [3642 IVs]
157.48 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [2062 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Ampharos (0v1)
vs Primarina (1v0, 2v1)

Member IVs (39)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/0/4 👑	163.11	76.62	306	#1597	+0	-10.6	-31.5	-23.9
13/1/0 👑	163.11	77.38	303	#1735	+0	-13.3	-33.2	-22.3
14/1/3 👑	163.23	77.08	304	#1817	+0	-13.6	-31.7	-24.1
15/2/0 👑	163.34	77.53	301	#2052	+0	-13.6	-34.0	-23.0
15/2/1 👑	163.34	77.53	301	#2053	+0	-13.6	-34.0	-23.0
14/0/5	163.23	76.32	306	#2071	+0	-14.1	-32.0	-24.1
14/0/6	163.23	76.32	306	#2072	+0	-14.1	-32.0	-24.1
14/0/7 👑	163.23	76.32	307	#2118	+0	-15.5	-31.2	-25.2
12/0/2 👑	162.97	76.92	306	#2351	+0	-11.0	-32.9	-25.8
14/0/0 👑	163.86	76.62	303	#2362	+0	-13.4	-33.5	-23.4
14/1/1	163.23	77.08	303	#2388	+0	-14.4	-34.7	-24.9
14/1/2	163.23	77.08	303	#2389	+0	-14.4	-34.7	-24.9
15/0/8 👑	163.34	76.03	307	#2507	+0	-15.7	-33.5	-25.2
15/0/9 👑	163.34	76.03	307	#2508	+0	-15.7	-33.5	-25.2
13/0/3	163.11	76.62	305	#2551	+0	-14.5	-34.0	-24.5
14/1/0	163.23	77.08	302	#2579	+0	-14.7	-35.1	-25.6
14/0/4	163.23	76.32	305	#2774	+0	-15.6	-34.8	-24.6
15/0/3 👑	163.98	76.32	304	#2831	+0	-19.6	-33.3	-23.0
15/1/4 👑	163.34	76.78	304	#2853	+0	-15.1	-35.0	-25.2
15/1/5 👑	163.34	76.78	304	#2854	+0	-15.1	-35.0	-25.2
15/0/1	163.98	76.32	303	#2970	+0	-19.8	-33.7	-23.8
15/0/2	163.98	76.32	303	#2971	+0	-19.8	-33.7	-23.8
13/0/1	163.11	76.62	304	#2972	+0	-15.8	-35.2	-25.4
13/0/2	163.11	76.62	304	#2973	+0	-15.8	-35.2	-25.4
15/1/3	163.34	76.78	303	#3004	+0	-15.3	-35.6	-25.9
13/0/0	163.11	76.62	303	#3074	+0	-15.6	-35.8	-26.0
15/0/7	163.34	76.03	306	#3219	+0	-16.2	-36.0	-26.9
12/0/1	162.97	76.92	305	#3322	+0	-15.2	-35.3	-26.3
15/0/6	163.34	76.03	305	#3417	+0	-16.8	-37.0	-27.6
14/0/3	163.23	76.32	304	#3449	+0	-21.9	-35.6	-25.6
12/0/0	162.97	76.92	304	#3527	+0	-15.0	-35.9	-27.2
14/0/1	163.23	76.32	303	#3561	+0	-22.1	-36.0	-26.3
14/0/2	163.23	76.32	303	#3562	+0	-22.1	-36.0	-26.3
15/0/0	163.98	76.32	302	#3581	+0	-23.6	-34.8	-25.9
15/1/2	163.34	76.78	302	#3622	+0	-23.1	-36.1	-26.7
15/1/0	163.34	76.78	301	#3881	+0	-24.0	-37.2	-28.8
15/1/1	163.34	76.78	301	#3882	+0	-24.0	-37.2	-28.8
15/0/4	163.34	76.03	304	#3888	+0	-23.7	-38.2	-28.2
15/0/5	163.34	76.03	304	#3889	+0	-23.7	-38.2	-28.2

General · atk≥151.55, def≥75.73 (4084 IV spreads)

Clears 2 anchors across 2 shield scenarios, covering Lapras, Shadow Walrein. Floor across 27 atk breakpoint opponents + 38 bulkpoint opponents. Clears the easiest anchor for every opponent.

151.55 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Walrein (2v1)
75.73 Def for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0)

Member IVs (4084)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
0/14/15 👑	152.05	86.56	312	#1	+9	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
0/13/12 👑	152.65	86.15	311	#2	+16	+1.0	+5.4	-6.2
0/14/14	152.05	86.56	311	#3	+7	-0.8	-0.6	-3.2
1/15/14 👑	152.20	86.97	310	#4	+11	-0.7	+1.8	-5.9
0/13/11	152.65	86.15	310	#6	+14	+0.2	+4.7	-7.9
1/13/14 👑	152.80	85.81	311	#7	+14	+0.3	+3.5	-6.7
1/14/11 👑	152.80	86.56	309	#8	+11	+0.4	+3.6	-8.6
0/12/15 👑	152.65	85.39	313	#9	+14	+0.2	+3.2	-8.0
0/15/11 👑	152.05	87.32	309	#10	+6	-0.2	-3.3	-3.7
0/14/12	152.05	86.56	310	#11	+7	-1.4	-3.7	-4.8
0/14/13	152.05	86.56	310	#12	+7	-1.4	-3.7	-4.8
0/13/9	152.65	86.15	309	#13	+9	-0.8	+2.9	-9.6
0/13/10	152.65	86.15	309	#14	+9	-0.8	+2.9	-9.6
0/13/15	152.05	85.81	312	#15	+6	-1.6	-3.9	-4.1
0/14/8 👑	152.65	86.90	308	#17	+13	-0.1	+3.3	-9.6
1/13/8 👑	153.40	86.15	308	#18	+12	-1.2	+2.9	-8.2
1/13/12	152.80	85.81	310	#19	+13	-0.6	+2.8	-8.4
1/13/13	152.80	85.81	310	#20	+13	-0.6	+2.8	-8.4
1/15/13	152.20	86.97	309	#21	+9	-1.4	-2.1	-8.7
2/15/10 👑	152.95	86.97	307	#22	+11	-0.5	+2.2	-9.4
0/15/5 👑	152.65	87.66	306	#23	+10	+0.6	+2.7	-8.0
1/14/10	152.80	86.56	308	#24	+10	-0.6	+2.9	-9.3
0/12/9 👑	153.24	85.73	310	#25	+14	-1.0	+3.6	-10.1
1/14/15 👑	152.20	86.22	311	#26	+9	-0.7	-2.2	-7.3
0/11/13 👑	153.24	84.97	313	#27	+13	-0.6	+1.6	-9.1
0/12/13	152.65	85.39	312	#28	+13	-0.6	+2.4	-9.9
0/12/14	152.65	85.39	312	#29	+13	-0.6	+2.4	-9.9
2/14/13 👑	152.95	86.22	309	#30	+11	+0.1	+1.9	-8.6
0/13/14	152.05	85.81	311	#31	+5	-2.3	-5.7	-4.8
2/13/15 👑	152.95	85.47	311	#32	+11	-1.3	+1.3	-9.1
2/15/14 👑	152.34	86.63	309	#33	+6	-1.9	-2.8	-9.4
2/15/15 👑	152.34	86.63	309	#34	+6	-1.9	-2.8	-9.4
0/14/7	152.65	86.90	307	#35	+9	-0.9	+1.8	-10.2
1/15/7 👑	152.80	87.32	306	#36	+10	-0.2	+0.8	-6.2
0/13/8	152.65	86.15	308	#37	+8	-1.5	+1.2	-8.8
3/14/14 👑	153.09	85.88	309	#38	+10	-1.0	+1.3	-9.8
3/14/15 👑	153.09	85.88	309	#39	+10	-1.0	+1.3	-9.8
3/15/12 👑	153.09	86.63	307	#40	+10	-1.1	+1.4	-9.8
2/13/4 👑	154.16	86.15	305	#41	+7	-1.8	+4.4	-7.8
1/15/11	152.20	86.97	308	#42	+8	-2.3	-2.8	-9.6
1/15/12	152.20	86.97	308	#43	+8	-2.3	-2.8	-9.6
0/13/5 👑	153.24	86.48	307	#44	+9	-1.4	+1.0	-10.0
1/14/14	152.20	86.22	310	#45	+8	-1.4	-2.9	-8.8
0/11/12	153.24	84.97	312	#46	+11	-1.4	+0.8	-10.0
0/15/4	152.65	87.66	305	#47	+8	-0.4	+2.1	-8.7
0/15/10	152.05	87.32	308	#48	+6	-1.1	-4.3	-7.2
2/14/11	152.95	86.22	308	#49	+9	-0.6	+0.2	-7.8
2/14/12	152.95	86.22	308	#50	+9	-0.6	+0.2	-7.8
0/12/12	152.65	85.39	311	#51	+10	-1.5	+0.1	-10.9
0/14/11	152.05	86.56	309	#52	+2	-2.1	-5.5	-9.5
… 4034 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Regidrago Mirror Atk · atk≥163.78, hp≥302 (5 IV spreads) (−31 vs Primarina Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 59 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Clefable, Corviknight, Cramorant, +23 more. Mirror atkpoint: passing cohort wins 5 of 9 scenarios vs rank-1 SP Regidrago (5 IVs pass).

155.00 Atk for Corviknight (Dragon Energy) vs Corviknight (1v0)
155.44 Atk for Corviknight (Vise Grip) vs Corviknight (1v0)
154.44 Atk for Melmetal (Dragon Energy) vs Melmetal (1v0)
155.61 Atk for Melmetal (Vise Grip) vs Melmetal (1v0)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Dragon Breath) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
153.86 Atk for Virizion (Dragon Energy) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
154.30 Atk for Virizion (Vise Grip) vs Virizion (1v2, 2v2)
157.83 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
158.56 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v2)
163.46 Atk for Rillaboom (Dragon Energy) vs Rillaboom (2v2 with bait)
163.46 Atk for Rillaboom (Dragon Breath) vs Rillaboom (2v2 with bait)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
160.09 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
161.91 Atk for Shadow Lapras (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Lapras (2v2)
158.37 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0, 1v1)
158.37 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0, 1v1)
160.66 Atk for Registeel (Dragon Energy) vs Registeel (2v0)
162.40 Atk for Registeel (Vise Grip) vs Registeel (2v0)
156.98 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
156.98 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
157.68 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v0)
162.12 Atk for Forretress (Dragon Energy) vs Forretress (0v0)
151.76 Atk for Regidrago (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
152.08 Atk for Regidrago (Vise Grip) vs Regidrago (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
157.77 Atk for Regidrago (Dragon Breath) vs Regidrago (2v2)
157.58 Atk for Clefable (Dragon Breath) vs Clefable (2v0)
157.58 Atk for Clefable (Dragon Energy) vs Clefable (2v0)
158.28 Atk for Clefable (Vise Grip) vs Clefable (2v0)
151.55 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0, 2v1)
159.62 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
162.86 Atk for Steelix (Dragon Breath) vs Steelix (1v1, 2v1)
162.86 Atk for Steelix (Dragon Energy) vs Steelix (1v1, 2v1)
162.84 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v0)
155.01 Atk for Swampert (Dragon Energy) vs Swampert (1v2)
155.30 Atk for Swampert (Vise Grip) vs Swampert (1v2)
154.61 Atk for Toucannon (Dragon Energy) vs Toucannon (0v0, 2v2)
156.29 Atk for Toucannon (Vise Grip) vs Toucannon (0v0, 2v2)
159.95 Atk for Toucannon (Dragon Breath) vs Toucannon (0v0)
163.07 Atk for Primarina (Dragon Breath) vs Primarina (1v0, 2v1)
163.07 Atk for Primarina (Dragon Energy) vs Primarina (1v0, 2v1)
162.98 Atk for Ampharos (Dragon Energy) vs Ampharos (0v1)
163.59 Atk for Ampharos (Vise Grip) vs Ampharos (0v1)
159.80 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
159.80 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
161.63 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Malamar (0v0, 2v2)
151.75 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Vise Grip) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
152.62 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Dragon Energy) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Dragon Energy) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
159.69 Atk for Feraligatr (Vise Grip) vs Feraligatr (2v2 no bait)
157.67 Atk for Cramorant (Dragon Energy) vs Cramorant (1v2 no bait)
157.79 Atk for Cramorant (Vise Grip) vs Cramorant (1v2 no bait)
156.69 Atk for Talonflame (Dragon Energy) vs Talonflame (0v1 no bait)
156.98 Atk for Talonflame (Vise Grip) vs Talonflame (0v1 no bait)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Breath) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
151.72 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Dragon Energy) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
152.94 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Vise Grip) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2)
157.02 Atk for Snorlax (Dragon Energy) vs Snorlax (0v0)
152.58 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Dragon Energy) vs Galarian Moltres (2v2)

Anchors we get for free (55 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

75.84 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
76.01 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
76.23 Def + 318 HP for Feraligatr bulk (Crunch) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
75.84 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
75.91 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
76.17 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
76.21 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Sludge Bomb) vs Guzzlord (0v1, 2v2)
75.76 Def for Dondozo bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (1v1)
75.82 Def for Dondozo bulk (Outrage) vs Dondozo (1v1)
76.15 Def for Dondozo bulk (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (1v1)
75.88 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
75.97 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
76.05 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1, 2v2)
75.86 Def for Seaking bulk (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (2v2)
75.93 Def for Seaking bulk (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (2v2)
76.05 Def for Seaking bulk (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (2v2)
76.10 Def for Seaking bulk (Megahorn) vs Seaking (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Aurora Beam) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Confusion) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Psycho Cut) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
76.09 Def for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
75.82 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
75.85 Def + 294 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
76.05 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
76.07 Def + 297 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Psybeam) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
75.91 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Power Gem) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.00 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.02 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.30 Def for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v2)
76.24 Def for Bellibolt bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Bellibolt (0v1)
76.03 Def + 298 HP for Snorlax bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
76.07 Def + 298 HP for Snorlax bulk (Superpower) vs Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
76.12 Def + 298 HP for Snorlax bulk (Outrage) vs Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
76.22 Def + 298 HP for Snorlax bulk (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
76.24 Def + 298 HP for Snorlax bulk (Heavy Slam) vs Snorlax (1v1 with bait)
75.86 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Psychic) vs Florges (1v0)
75.89 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v0)
76.03 Def + 322 HP for Florges bulk (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (1v0)
75.73 Def for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.76 Def + 293 HP for Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.81 Def for Lapras bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.98 Def for Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v0)
76.01 Def for Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v0)
76.01 Def for Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v0)
75.88 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.90 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.92 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
76.01 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
76.04 Def + 321 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
75.75 Def + 319 HP for Deoxys Defense bulk (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v2)
75.73 Def + 321 HP for Seismitoad bulk (Icy Wind) vs Seismitoad (1v1 with bait)
76.20 Def + 321 HP for Seismitoad bulk (Earth Power) vs Seismitoad (1v1 with bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

154.45 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [3642 IVs]
151.60 Atk + 294 HP flips Bellibolt (0v1 no bait) [4067 IVs]
151.60 Atk + 302 HP flips Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1 no bait) [3219 IVs]
151.60 Atk + 294 HP flips Lapras (1v0) [4067 IVs]
157.48 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [2062 IVs]
151.60 Atk + 298 HP flips Bellibolt (0v1 no bait) [3860 IVs]

Member IVs (5)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/0/0 👑	163.86	76.62	303	#2362	+0	-13.4	-33.5	-23.4
15/0/3 👑	163.98	76.32	304	#2831	+0	-19.6	-33.3	-23.0
15/0/1	163.98	76.32	303	#2970	+0	-19.8	-33.7	-23.8
15/0/2	163.98	76.32	303	#2971	+0	-19.8	-33.7	-23.8
15/0/0	163.98	76.32	302	#3581	+0	-23.6	-34.8	-25.9

Per-matchup IV finder (139 specific matchups - e.g. "which IV beats a given opponent in a given shield?")

Collapsed by default. This is a per-(opponent, shield) lookup: each card is one matchup and the exact IV spreads that win it. For "what do I need vs threat X" use Threats where your build choice matters above, or paste your collection into the scatter. Composite cards (slayer ∩ tier) surface IVs that satisfy a slayer anchor and a stat-cutoff tier; pure slayer-archetype cards live in the Slayer Builds block below, pure tier cards in the Threshold Tiers above.

Show only notable categories (≤ 5% of cohort or ≤ 5 members). Uncheck to see every non-trivial intersection.

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Regidrago Mirror Atk (5 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Regidrago Mirror Atk · atk≥163.784, hp≥302

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +3.1, spread 0.9)

15/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 302, SP #4090

One of 5 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Regidrago Mirror Atk threshold (atk≥163.784, hp≥302). Carries top Anchors-First Slayer mirror wins (144/144) AND clears the Regidrago Mirror Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4082

15/0/2 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4081

15/0/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 304, SP #4041

14/0/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.86, def 76.62, hp 303, SP #4043

One of 5 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Regidrago Mirror Atk threshold (atk≥163.784, hp≥302). Trades mirror dominance (141/144 wins, vs 144/144 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Regidrago Mirror Atk cutoff.

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Rillaboom Atk (5 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Rillaboom Atk · atk≥163.46

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +3.1, spread 0.9)

15/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 302, SP #4090

One of 5 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Rillaboom Atk threshold (atk≥163.46). Carries top Anchors-First Slayer mirror wins (144/144) AND clears the Rillaboom Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4082

15/0/2 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4081

15/0/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 304, SP #4041

14/0/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.86, def 76.62, hp 303, SP #4043

One of 5 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Rillaboom Atk threshold (atk≥163.46). Trades mirror dominance (141/144 wins, vs 144/144 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Rillaboom Atk cutoff.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Regidrago Mirror Atk (5 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Regidrago Mirror Atk · atk≥163.784, hp≥302

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +3.1, spread 0.9)

15/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 302, SP #4090

One of 5 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Regidrago Mirror Atk threshold (atk≥163.784, hp≥302). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (144/144) AND clears the Regidrago Mirror Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4082

15/0/2 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4081

15/0/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 304, SP #4041

14/0/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.86, def 76.62, hp 303, SP #4043

One of 5 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Regidrago Mirror Atk threshold (atk≥163.784, hp≥302). Trades mirror dominance (141/144 wins, vs 144/144 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Regidrago Mirror Atk cutoff.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Rillaboom Atk (5 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Rillaboom Atk · atk≥163.46

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +3.1, spread 0.9)

15/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 302, SP #4090

One of 5 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Rillaboom Atk threshold (atk≥163.46). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (144/144) AND clears the Rillaboom Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4082

One of 5 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Rillaboom Atk threshold (atk≥163.46). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (144/144) AND clears the Rillaboom Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/2 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4081

One of 5 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Rillaboom Atk threshold (atk≥163.46). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (144/144) AND clears the Rillaboom Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 304, SP #4041

One of 5 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Rillaboom Atk threshold (atk≥163.46). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (144/144) AND clears the Rillaboom Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

14/0/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.86, def 76.62, hp 303, SP #4043

One of 5 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Rillaboom Atk threshold (atk≥163.46). Trades mirror dominance (141/144 wins, vs 144/144 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Rillaboom Atk cutoff.

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Ampharos Atk (19 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Ampharos Atk · atk≥162.977

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +1.8, spread 1.3)

15/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 302, SP #4090

One of 19 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥162.977). Carries top Anchors-First Slayer mirror wins (144/144) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4082

15/0/2 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4081

15/0/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 304, SP #4041

14/0/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.86, def 76.62, hp 303, SP #4043

One of 19 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥162.977). Trades mirror dominance (141/144 wins, vs 144/144 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Ampharos Atk cutoff.

15/0/4 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.03, hp 304, SP #4092

One of 19 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥162.977). Trades mirror dominance (135/144 wins, vs 144/144 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Ampharos Atk cutoff.

15/0/5 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.03, hp 304, SP #4091

15/0/6 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.03, hp 305, SP #4083

15/0/7 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.03, hp 306, SP #4055

15/0/8 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.03, hp 307, SP #4012

15/0/9 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.03, hp 307, SP #4011

15/1/0 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.78, hp 301, SP #4094

15/1/1 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.78, hp 301, SP #4093

15/1/2 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.78, hp 302, SP #4084

15/1/3 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.78, hp 303, SP #4056

15/1/4 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.78, hp 304, SP #4009

15/1/5 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.78, hp 304, SP #4008

15/2/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 77.53, hp 301, SP #4021

15/2/1 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 77.53, hp 301, SP #4020

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Primarina Atk (19 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Primarina Atk · atk≥163.066

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +1.8, spread 1.3)

15/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 302, SP #4090

One of 19 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Primarina Atk threshold (atk≥163.066). Carries top Anchors-First Slayer mirror wins (144/144) AND clears the Primarina Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4082

15/0/2 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 303, SP #4081

15/0/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.98, def 76.32, hp 304, SP #4041

14/0/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 163.86, def 76.62, hp 303, SP #4043

One of 19 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Primarina Atk threshold (atk≥163.066). Trades mirror dominance (141/144 wins, vs 144/144 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Primarina Atk cutoff.

15/0/4 heavy atk weight - atk 163.34, def 76.03, hp 304, SP #4092

One of 19 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Primarina Atk threshold (atk≥163.066). Trades mirror dominance (135/144 wins, vs 144/144 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Primarina Atk cutoff.