Runerigus Ultra League IV Dive

Opponent list (63 mons)

Tinkaton, Corviknight, Snorlax (Shadow), Corviknight (Shadow), Melmetal, Virizion, Zygarde (Complete Forme), Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow), Mimikyu, Snorlax, Florges, Moltres (Galarian), Feraligatr (Shadow), Feraligatr, Jellicent, Giratina (Altered), Cramorant, Guzzlord, Skeledirge, Rillaboom, Lapras, Lapras (Shadow), Dusknoir, Ninetales (Alolan), Dondozo, Dusknoir (Shadow), Registeel, Blastoise, Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), Forretress, Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), Regidrago, Ninetales, Cresselia, Muk (Alolan), Clefable, Talonflame, Forretress (Shadow), Walrein, Walrein (Shadow), Deoxys (Defense), Runerigus, Steelix, Seaking, Cresselia (Shadow), Steelix (Shadow), Swampert, Toucannon, Milotic (Shadow), Primarina, Ampharos, Cradily (Shadow), Malamar (Shadow), Ampharos (Shadow), Talonflame (Shadow), Bellibolt, Seismitoad, Annihilape, Miltank, Forretress (Bug Bite), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)

Which one to build? [all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (253 spreads, no rule fits it -- the list is the build) guarantees 43 of the 70 decision matchups; Build 3 (50 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 39 others; Build 1 wide (965 spreads) keeps 32 of Build 1's 43 guaranteed matchups.

Build criteria: the same control as the one in the scatter strip below; either handle moves both

Runerigus running Shadow Claw / Rock Tomb, Shadow Ball.

[all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (253 spreads, no rule fits it -- the list is the build) guarantees 43 of the 70 decision matchups; Build 3 (50 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 39 others; Build 1 wide (965 spreads) keeps 32 of Build 1's 43 guaranteed matchups.

No single-stat line on this moveset.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 253 spreads by list	253	43 of 70, 2 of them material; 25 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Ninetales (outside 5%)	11: 0v0 Melmetal, 0v0 Cresselia, +9 more	13/13/11 (274 of 567 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (43 of 70), its 253 members all inside attack IV 12-15, defense IV 1-15, HP IV 10-15; that box also holds 107 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (3) 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 33%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 45% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 77%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (8) 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 43% 1v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 47%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 69% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 79% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 5%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 55% 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 78%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 85%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (2) 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 11%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (2) 2v0 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 74% 2v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 85% 2v1 (13) 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 35% 2v1 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 40% 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 42% 2v1 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 43%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (9) 2v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 30% 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 40% 2v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 40%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 46%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (253), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 141.00 and Def >= 199.90 and HP >= 135	965	32 of 70, 0 of them material; 17 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	22: 0v0 Corviknight, 0v0 Melmetal, +20 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 99% of the same spreads (11 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 253 spreads in 965 of its own, and keeps 32 of Build 1's 43 guaranteed matchups (none of them material). The 11 it gives up out here: 1v1 Ninetales (grid 10%), 1v2 Cresselia (grid 17%) and 2v2 Ninetales (grid 34%), and 8 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 210.20 and HP >= 138 (bulk box)	50	39 of 70, 7 of them material; 21 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v0 Feraligatr (outside 2%)	15: 0v0 Corviknight, 1v0 Virizion, +13 more	10/15/15 (277 of 567 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (39 of 70), its 50 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (4) 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 13%; material 0v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 30% 0v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 48% 0v1 (1) 0v1 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 37%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 (1) 0v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 78%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (9) 1v0 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 2%; material 1v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 12%; material 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 46% 1v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 50% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 13%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 57% 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 79%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (2) 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 12%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (2) 2v0 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 76%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 86% 2v1 (9) 2v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 6%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 39% 2v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 42% 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 45% 2v2 (6) 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 34%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 49%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 75% Members (50), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 3 (bulk)'s most-winning spread 10/15/15@50 wins 3 more matchups overall (277 against 274, of 567), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 4 more of the 70 decision matchups (43 against 39).

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 85 spreads by list	85	21 of 31 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 49 of 70 overall, 5 of them material; 29 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Seaking (outside 4%)	6: 0v0 Melmetal, 1v0 Feraligatr, +4 more	13/11/14 (85 of 189 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (21 of 31 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 49 of 70 overall), its 85 members all inside attack IV 12-15, defense IV 10-15, HP IV 10-15; that box also holds 59 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 4%; material 0v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 29% 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 36%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 47% 0v1 (1) 0v1 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 37%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 (1) 0v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 78%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (9) 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 46% 1v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 49% 1v0 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 59% 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 70% 1v1 (6) 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 9%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 12%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 57% 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 79%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (2) 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 15%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (2) 2v0 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 76% 2v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 86% 2v1 (13) 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 38% 2v1 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 43% 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 44% 2v1 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 46%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (10) 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 33%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 33% 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 43% 2v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 43%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (85), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 141.00 and Def >= 207.50 and HP >= 135	355	16 of 31 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 40 of 70 overall, 2 of them material; 22 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	15: 0v0 Corviknight, 0v0 Melmetal, +13 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 85 spreads in 355 of its own, and keeps 16 of Build 1's 21 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (40 of its 49 overall, 2 of them material). The 9 it gives up out here: 0v0 Seaking (grid 6%), 1v1 Ninetales (grid 10%) and 1v2 Cresselia (grid 17%), and 6 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 210.20 and HP >= 138 (bulk box)	50	15 of 31 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 39 of 70 overall, 7 of them material; 21 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v0 Feraligatr (outside 2%)	16: 0v0 Corviknight, 0v0 Seaking, +14 more	10/15/15 (86 of 189 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (15 of 31 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 39 of 70 overall), its 50 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (4) 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 13%; material 0v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 30% 0v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 48% 0v1 (1) 0v1 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 37%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 (1) 0v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 78%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (9) 1v0 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 2%; material 1v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 12%; material 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 46% 1v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 50% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 13%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 57% 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 79%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (2) 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 12%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (2) 2v0 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 76%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 86% 2v1 (9) 2v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 6%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 39% 2v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 42% 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 45% 2v2 (6) 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 34%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 49%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 75% Members (50), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 3 (bulk)'s most-winning spread 10/15/15@50 wins 1 more matchup in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (86 against 85, of 189), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 6 more of the 31 decision matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (21 against 15; 49 against 39 over all 70).

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 374 spreads by list	374	5 of 7 in 1v1 shields; 36 of 70 overall, 2 of them material; 20 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Ninetales (outside 1%)	11: 0v0 Clefable, 0v1 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), +9 more	13/11/14 (27 of 63 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (5 of 7 in 1v1 shields; 36 of 70 overall), its 374 members all inside attack IV 12-15, defense IV 0-15, HP IV 7-15; that box also holds 202 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (2) 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 31%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 (1) 0v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 76%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (6) 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 68% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 79% 1v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 81% 1v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 (5) 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 1%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 54% 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 78%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 85%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (2) 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 8%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (2) 2v0 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 74% 2v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 85% 2v1 (9) 2v1 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 38% 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 45% 2v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 66% 2v2 (9) 2v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 28% 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 38% 2v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 38%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 44%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (374), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 141.00 and Def + 3.1*HP >= 617.9	1333	4 of 7 in 1v1 shields; 24 of 70 overall, 0 of them material; 13 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	23: 0v0 Corviknight, 0v0 Clefable, +21 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 96% of the same spreads (12 extra, 36 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 374 spreads in 1333 of its own, and keeps 4 of Build 1's 5 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (24 of its 36 overall, none of them material). The 12 it gives up out here: 1v1 Ninetales (grid 10%), 1v2 Cresselia (grid 17%) and 2v2 Ninetales (grid 34%), and 9 more.
Build 2 (fork)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 318 spreads by list	318	5 of 7 in 1v1 shields; 38 of 70 overall, 2 of them material; 21 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Seaking (outside 7%)	9: 0v0 Corviknight, 1v1 Ninetales, +7 more	9/13/14 (25 of 63 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 2 guarantees (5 of 7 in 1v1 shields; 38 of 70 overall), its 318 members all inside attack IV 5-14, defense IV 10-15, HP IV 9-15; that box also holds 102 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (2) 0v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 44% 0v1 (1) 0v1 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 33%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 (1) 0v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 76%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (9) 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 42% 1v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 46% 1v0 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 57% 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 68% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 7%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 54% 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 78%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 85%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (1) 2v0 (2) 2v0 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 74% 2v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 85% 2v1 (10) 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 34% 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 41% 2v1 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 48% 2v2 (7) 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 29%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 45%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 53%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 74% Members (318), highest stat product first

Rates: outside N% is the share of the spreads NOT in that build that win the same matchup anyway; grid N% (the Notable spreads list and the cards at the top of the page) is the share of all the spreads on the grid. Weight follows the rate: bold = fewer than half of them win it; bold and underlined = fewer than a quarter; bold, underlined and italic = fewer than a tenth; dim = more than nine in ten win it anyway.

Each build's guarantee list is sorted by outside rate: how often the spreads NOT in that build win the same matchup anyway. The lower the rate, the rarer the guarantee.

Against the 30 spreads the mirror-slayer protocol converges on for Runerigus (attack-first here), no attack on this grid wins charge-move priority against even half of them.

Is mine in one of these?

Paste your Poke Genie CSV, or add one spread by hand, in Check my collection below; the answer comes back here, grouped by build, and your collection stays in your browser.

Shield scenario:

Y: Color:

Stat-product rank against matchups won with PvPoke-default opponent IVs at the league cap over the whole opponent pool and, with Shield scenario on all, every baked shield state -- the view the single-stat line in the expander below was derived on. The Shield scenario selector on this row is the section's own; the scatter's dropdowns and the opponent filter do not drive this panel.

SP1 10/15/15, 11/15/15

Notable spreads

Every single spread this page names, on one list: the spread that wins the most matchups, the one with the highest avg battle score, SP1, and each build's most-winning member. Entries whose decision-matchup wins overlap by 90% or more are merged, because two spreads that win the same matchups are one offer.

10/15/15 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios) / Stat-product rank-1 (SP1) / Build 3's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 3, which guarantees 39 of the 58 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 0v0 Steelix (Shadow) (grid 3%), 1v0 Feraligatr (grid 3%) and 2v2 Toucannon (grid 4%)

What else is true of 10/15/15

11/15/15 (Highest avg battle score) differs from it by 1 decision matchup, so this entry is the offer and they are spellings of it.

13/13/11 -- Build 1's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 1, which guarantees 43 of the 62 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 0v1 Runerigus (grid 3%), 2v2 Toucannon (grid 4%) and 0v0 Seaking (grid 6%)

What to do with this: If you already have one of these spreads, build it: each is the top of this grid on the measure that named it. If you are hunting, hunt a build instead.

Wild catches needed to meet one named spread out of the 4096 on this grid: 2839 for a 50% chance, 5678 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

The single-stat line

None of the 5 movesets on this page carries a line. This page is Shadow Claw / Rock Tomb, Shadow Ball, and it carries no line; Astonish / Rock Tomb, Shadow Ball, Astonish / Brutal Swing, Sand Tomb, Shadow Claw / Rock Tomb, Sand Tomb and Shadow Claw / Sand Tomb, Shadow Ball carry no line.

Line: none
Closest: HP >= 133 -- 2v2 Feraligatr, rank 15, 192 spreads of 4096 on the wrong side
SP1: 10/15/15 -- wins 277 of 567
Alternative: Def >= 207.55, HP >= 127 (1411 spreads, 34.4%)
Decision width: 0 matchups

No attack, defense or HP threshold decides a matchup for Runerigus running Shadow Claw / Rock Tomb, Shadow Ball in Ultra League; build for stat product. The closest thing to a line is 133 HP in the 2v2 against Feraligatr (rank 15). 1936 of the 2048 spreads at or above it win, against 80 of the 2048 below. It is not a build line because 192 of 4096 spreads sit on the wrong side of it -- over the 20 a near-exact rule allows -- and neither side of it is clean.

What bulk does carry is 207.55 defense with 127 HP -- 1411 spreads, 34.4% of the grid. They win 1 contested matchup -- 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- that at most 1% of the spreads outside them win. SP1, 10/15/15 at L50.0, wins 277 of its 567 matchups, and is inside that pair. No spread on this grid wins more matchups than SP1 does, so the whole IV decision here is zero matchups wide.

rank-1

Shield scenario:

Why these regions

Why these regions and not others. The set panel below is every candidate region the builds were cut from. Under it, the same grid grouped by which contested matchups a spread wins -- its win/loss fingerprint, not its score -- drawn on the stat planes where a region is a shape; crossing a breakpoint or bulkpoint moves a spread to the next cluster.

The set panel (an UpSet plot: a bar chart of set intersections, Lex et al. 2014). Left: the named sets the lattice was built from (rows, labelled 'spreads in the set / decision matchups every member of it wins') and the candidate regions made by intersecting them (columns -- bar height is spreads, the number above it is decision matchups guaranteed in the shield scenarios this setting counts, and a coloured column is one of the builds in the table above). A dot means the region sits inside that row's set. The letters index THIS setting's own eight sets and are re-assigned when the Build criteria change, so compare the row names across Build criteria settings, not the letters.

clusters

Shield scenario:

Lattice view: 96% of this dive's IV spreads sit at the same level (L50) -- this species does not reach the league CP cap, so it is pinned at the max power-up level. At a fixed level each battle stat tracks a single IV, so attack / defense / HP each take only ~16 values and the panels look like a sparse grid: each visible point stacks the spreads that share a stat pair (up to 16, one per remaining IV). This is expected, not missing data -- the clustering still runs on the full set of win/loss fingerprints.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2112	143.3	204.4	130	#475-#4096	2.6	-
C1	1984	143.2	206.5	136	#1-#3511	5.2	Clefable (+100pp), Cresselia (+63pp), Miltank (+55pp), Melmetal (+30pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Clefable	0%	100%
Corviknight	38%	38%
Shadow Cradily	69%	69%
Cresselia	0%	63%
Miltank	45%	100%
Melmetal	0%	30%
Seismitoad	15%	0%
Seaking	0%	12%
Skeledirge	92%	100%
Shadow Steelix	0%	5%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Clefable	48%	wins iff hp >= 133	88%	named
Corviknight	38%	wins iff atk >= 145.37	100%	named
Shadow Cradily	69%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	100%	named
Cresselia	31%	wins iff hp >= 135	85%	named
Miltank	71%	wins iff hp >= 130	89%	named
Melmetal	15%	wins iff sp >= 4,180,013	88%	named
Seismitoad	8%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Seaking	6%	wins iff sp >= 4,174,212	96%	named
Skeledirge	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,537,312	96%	named
Shadow Steelix	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,212,492	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	556	141.6	203.0	127	#2098-#4096	2.9	-
C1	3540	143.5	205.8	133	#1-#4005	9.2	Empoleon (+92pp), Galarian Moltres (+82pp), Corviknight (+79pp), Blastoise (+69pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Mimikyu	0%	58%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	0%	54%
Jellicent	11%	68%
Seismitoad	17%	69%
Galarian Moltres	0%	82%
Bellibolt	28%	81%
Runerigus	8%	28%
Empoleon	1%	93%
Blastoise	23%	93%
Shadow Walrein	0%	15%
Virizion	82%	88%
Corviknight	20%	99%
Lapras	97%	88%
Feraligatr	0%	4%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Mimikyu	50%	wins iff hp >= 133	90%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	47%	wins iff hp >= 133	95%	named
Jellicent	60%	wins iff def >= 205.91	81%	named
Seismitoad	62%	wins iff atk >= 142.01	87%	named
Galarian Moltres	71%	wins iff hp >= 131	94%	named
Bellibolt	74%	wins iff sp >= 3,777,251	84%	named
Runerigus	25%	wins iff atk >= 146.61	100%	named
Empoleon	80%	wins iff hp >= 129	91%	named
Blastoise	83%	wins iff sp >= 3,722,788	94%	named
Shadow Walrein	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,199,036	88%	named
Virizion	88%	wins iff atk >= 138.65	100%	named
Corviknight	88%	wins iff sp >= 3,662,962	93%	named
Lapras	90%	wins iff atk >= 138.65	98%	named
Feraligatr	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,229,438	97%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	356	145.5	202.5	127	#1544-#4048	2.2	-
C1	1360	139.0	205.6	132	#417-#4096	2.7	Shadow Corviknight (+84pp), Dusknoir (+77pp); trades away Shadow Cradily (-93pp), Ampharos (-30pp)
C2	1927	144.6	205.6	133	#1-#3720	5.4	Tinkaton (+95pp), Shadow Cradily (+92pp), Bellibolt (+21pp), Shadow Corviknight (+16pp)
C3	453	148.4	206.2	135	#6-#1299	8.1	Ninetales (+92pp), Ampharos (+81pp), Bellibolt (+51pp), Florges (+18pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2	C3
Tinkaton	0%	2%	98%	100%
Shadow Cradily	100%	7%	99%	100%
Dusknoir	4%	81%	88%	100%
Ampharos	30%	0%	12%	93%
Bellibolt	0%	0%	21%	72%
Shadow Corviknight	0%	84%	100%	100%
Seaking	0%	5%	19%	29%
Ninetales	0%	0%	0%	92%
Shadow Empoleon	78%	86%	100%	100%
Florges	10%	0%	4%	22%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Tinkaton	58%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	87%	named
Shadow Cradily	69%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	100%	named
Dusknoir	80%	wins iff sp >= 3,687,906	85%	named
Ampharos	18%	wins iff atk >= 147.35	100%	named
Bellibolt	18%	wins iff sp >= 4,092,004	90%	named
Shadow Corviknight	86%	wins iff hp >= 128	92%	named
Seaking	14%	wins iff sp >= 4,150,751	89%	named
Ninetales	10%	wins iff sp >= 4,132,407	92%	named
Shadow Empoleon	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,592,268	95%	named
Florges	5%	wins iff atk >= 149.13	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3361	142.6	205.0	132	#54-#4096	1.7	-
C1	735	146.3	207.2	136	#1-#1747	4.9	Miltank (+78pp), Ampharos (+75pp), Cresselia (+72pp), Corviknight (+41pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Ampharos	25%	100%
Miltank	22%	100%
Melmetal	13%	39%
Cresselia	4%	76%
Corviknight	6%	47%
Giratina (Altered)	9%	31%
Steelix	89%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Ampharos	38%	wins iff hp >= 135	85%	named
Miltank	36%	wins iff atk >= 145.78	96%	named
Melmetal	18%	wins iff atk >= 147.79	100%	named
Cresselia	17%	wins iff sp >= 4,076,684	90%	named
Corviknight	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,176,871	90%	named
Giratina (Altered)	13%	wins iff def >= 209.87	95%	named
Steelix	91%	wins iff sp >= 3,626,559	93%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2245	143.2	205.1	130	#296-#4096	6.8	-
C1	1851	143.2	205.8	136	#1-#3670	12.9	Shadow Snorlax (+98pp), Blastoise (+97pp), Walrein (+87pp), Galarian Moltres (+76pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Snorlax	50%	50%
Galarian Moltres	17%	93%
Blastoise	3%	100%
Shadow Snorlax	1%	99%
Mimikyu	44%	44%
Dondozo	56%	57%
Shadow Lapras	22%	68%
Walrein	0%	87%
Bellibolt	24%	47%
Tinkaton	68%	70%
Florges	47%	100%
Runerigus	80%	82%
Alolan Ninetales	18%	18%
Shadow Malamar	0%	33%
Shadow Corviknight	74%	100%
Seismitoad	0%	19%
Ninetales	84%	100%
Rillaboom	0%	15%
Empoleon	2%	11%
Shadow Feraligatr	93%	94%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Snorlax	50%	wins iff atk >= 143.69	100%	named
Galarian Moltres	52%	wins iff hp >= 134	92%	named
Blastoise	47%	wins iff hp >= 133	94%	named
Shadow Snorlax	45%	wins iff hp >= 134	95%	named
Mimikyu	44%	wins iff atk >= 144.53	100%	named
Dondozo	56%	wins iff atk >= 142.85	100%	named
Shadow Lapras	43%	wins iff def >= 208.41	81%	named
Walrein	39%	wins iff hp >= 135	95%	named
Bellibolt	34%	wins iff atk >= 146.57	89%	named
Tinkaton	69%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	100%	named
Florges	71%	wins iff sp >= 3,795,033	91%	named
Runerigus	81%	wins iff atk >= 139.49	100%	named
Alolan Ninetales	18%	wins iff atk >= 147.35	99%	named
Shadow Malamar	15%	wins iff sp >= 4,105,643	92%	named
Shadow Corviknight	86%	wins iff hp >= 128	92%	named
Seismitoad	9%	wins iff sp >= 4,174,488	94%	named
Ninetales	92%	wins iff sp >= 3,615,827	94%	named
Rillaboom	7%	wins iff sp >= 4,211,191	94%	named
Empoleon	6%	wins iff def >= 210.92	95%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	94%	wins iff atk >= 137.81	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3120	141.8	205.3	132	#26-#4096	7.0	-
C1	976	148.0	205.8	134	#1-#2972	13.7	Florges (+87pp), Runerigus (+87pp), Ninetales (+86pp), Mimikyu (+74pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Feraligatr	46%	59%
Mimikyu	26%	100%
Regidrago	26%	100%
Shadow Corviknight	54%	67%
Ninetales	14%	100%
Seaking	33%	40%
Shadow Cradily	66%	100%
Florges	4%	91%
Runerigus	4%	91%
Cramorant	72%	86%
Shadow Talonflame	74%	88%
Melmetal	3%	65%
Alolan Muk	5%	52%
Shadow Empoleon	82%	91%
Cresselia	84%	100%
Skeledirge	14%	4%
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	87%	100%
Shadow Malamar	7%	11%
Toucannon	1%	14%
Shadow Dusknoir	0%	10%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Feraligatr	49%	wins iff hp >= 133	95%	named
Mimikyu	44%	wins iff atk >= 144.53	100%	named
Regidrago	44%	wins iff atk >= 144.53	100%	named
Shadow Corviknight	57%	wins iff hp >= 132	90%	named
Ninetales	34%	wins iff sp >= 3,993,477	87%	named
Seaking	34%	wins iff def >= 207.55	98%	named
Shadow Cradily	74%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	95%	named
Florges	25%	wins iff atk >= 146.96	100%	named
Runerigus	25%	wins iff atk >= 146.96	100%	named
Cramorant	76%	wins iff hp >= 130	96%	named
Shadow Talonflame	77%	wins iff hp >= 128	88%	named
Melmetal	18%	wins iff atk >= 147.79	100%	named
Alolan Muk	16%	wins iff atk >= 148.68	95%	named
Shadow Empoleon	84%	wins iff def >= 201.91	88%	named
Cresselia	88%	wins iff atk >= 138.65	100%	named
Skeledirge	12%	wins iff sp < 3,615,827	91%	named
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	90%	wins iff hp >= 127	94%	named
Shadow Malamar	8%	wins iff hp >= 139	95%	named
Toucannon	4%	wins iff sp >= 4,202,718	97%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	2%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named

all scenarios: 81 win/loss bits (one per contested opponent per scenario) concatenated across 6 of 9 shield scenarios (0v1, 0v2, 2v0 excluded as degenerate); 2425 distinct win patterns; K=2 clusters (silhouette 0.35); split at hp 132.50.

Sharpest single scenarios on this page: 1v1 shields (K=4, silhouette 0.56 over 10 contested opponents, split atk 140.75) and 1v2 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.55 over 7 contested opponents, split atk 145.57) -- pick them in the dropdown above.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2166	143.3	205.0	130	#332-#4096	27.8	-
C1	1930	143.2	205.8	136	#1-#3670	47.5	Shadow Alolan Ninetales [1v0] (+98pp), Blastoise [2v1] (+98pp), Shadow Snorlax [2v1] (+96pp), Feraligatr [2v2] (+96pp); trades away Skeledirge [2v2] (-22pp)

Per-cluster win rates vs each contested opponent

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Snorlax [2v1]	50%	50%
Mimikyu [1v0]	11%	95%
Feraligatr [2v2]	4%	100%
Clefable [0v0]	8%	94%
Galarian Moltres [2v1]	17%	91%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [1v0]	1%	99%
Blastoise [2v1]	1%	99%
Shadow Snorlax [2v1]	0%	96%
Mimikyu [2v1]	44%	43%
Dondozo [2v1]	56%	56%
Mimikyu [2v2]	44%	43%
Regidrago [2v2]	44%	43%
Shadow Lapras [2v1]	21%	68%
Shadow Corviknight [2v2]	19%	100%
Tinkaton [1v1]	46%	72%
Jellicent [1v0]	45%	77%
Walrein [2v1]	0%	83%
Ampharos [1v2]	3%	77%
Seismitoad [1v0]	50%	76%
Corviknight [0v0]	38%	37%
Miltank [1v2]	31%	40%
Ninetales [2v2]	20%	51%
Seaking [2v2]	29%	41%
Bellibolt [2v1]	24%	46%
Shadow Cradily [0v0]	68%	69%
Shadow Cradily [1v1]	68%	69%
Tinkaton [2v1]	68%	69%
Cresselia [0v0]	0%	65%
Galarian Moltres [1v0]	45%	100%
Florges [2v1]	45%	100%
Miltank [0v0]	46%	100%
Shadow Cradily [2v2]	68%	80%
Bellibolt [1v0]	65%	84%
Runerigus [1v0]	25%	25%
Florges [2v2]	25%	24%
Runerigus [2v2]	25%	24%
Cramorant [2v2]	54%	100%
Shadow Talonflame [2v2]	62%	95%
Dusknoir [1v1]	62%	100%
Empoleon [1v0]	63%	100%
Runerigus [2v1]	81%	81%
Ampharos [1v1]	19%	18%
Bellibolt [1v1]	8%	29%
Alolan Ninetales [2v1]	18%	18%
Melmetal [1v2]	19%	16%
Melmetal [2v2]	19%	16%
Blastoise [1v0]	68%	100%
Cresselia [1v2]	4%	31%
Alolan Muk [2v2]	12%	20%
Shadow Empoleon [2v2]	70%	100%
Shadow Malamar [2v1]	0%	32%
Melmetal [0v0]	0%	31%
Shadow Corviknight [1v1]	73%	100%
Shadow Corviknight [2v1]	73%	100%
Seaking [1v1]	0%	29%
Corviknight [1v2]	0%	28%
Shadow Walrein [1v0]	0%	28%
Giratina (Altered) [1v2]	7%	20%
Virizion [1v0]	87%	88%
Cresselia [2v2]	87%	88%
Corviknight [1v0]	78%	100%
Skeledirge [2v2]	22%	0%
Lapras [1v0]	91%	88%
Ninetales [1v1]	2%	20%
Shadow Giratina (Altered) [2v2]	82%	100%
Steelix [1v2]	84%	100%
Seismitoad [2v1]	0%	18%
Ninetales [2v1]	84%	100%
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	0%	18%
Seismitoad [0v0]	14%	0%
Rillaboom [2v1]	0%	14%
Shadow Empoleon [1v1]	88%	99%
Empoleon [2v1]	2%	11%
Shadow Feraligatr [2v1]	94%	94%
Seaking [0v0]	0%	12%
Florges [1v1]	6%	4%
Skeledirge [0v0]	92%	100%
Toucannon [2v2]	0%	8%
Feraligatr [1v0]	0%	7%
Shadow Steelix [0v0]	0%	5%
Shadow Dusknoir [2v2]	3%	2%

Green tint = the cluster mostly wins that matchup, red tint = mostly loses; the percentage is the share of the cluster's IVs that win.

Stat rules that reproduce the clusters (in-sample accuracy 98.3%)

hp < 132.50:
  hp < 131.50:
    -> cluster C0 (n=1792)
  hp >= 131.50:
    def < 209.65:
      -> cluster C0 (n=208)
    def >= 209.65:
      -> cluster C1 (n=48)
hp >= 132.50:
  hp < 133.50:
    def < 205.45:
      -> cluster C0 (n=128)
    def >= 205.45:
      -> cluster C1 (n=130)
  hp >= 133.50:
    hp < 134.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=268)
    hp >= 134.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=1522)

Depth-3 decision tree over (atk, def, hp). Accuracy is in-sample (regularized by a minimum leaf size), not cross-validated -- read it as "how well the clusters reduce to stat regions", not a prediction claim.

Matchup flip thresholds (candidate anchors)

The single stat and threshold that most accurately predicts win/loss across all IVs -- misclassifications allowed, so it is a diagnostic and a candidate anchor, not a build target. The "flips at" cutoffs under "Threats where your build choice matters" answer the other question (the lowest cutoff whose 75/25 split is clean) and are usually higher for the same opponent.

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Snorlax [2v1]	50%	wins iff atk >= 143.69	100%	named
Mimikyu [1v0]	50%	wins iff hp >= 133	90%	named
Feraligatr [2v2]	49%	wins iff hp >= 133	95%	named
Clefable [0v0]	48%	wins iff hp >= 133	88%	named
Galarian Moltres [2v1]	52%	wins iff hp >= 134	92%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [1v0]	47%	wins iff hp >= 133	95%	named
Blastoise [2v1]	47%	wins iff hp >= 133	94%	named
Shadow Snorlax [2v1]	45%	wins iff hp >= 134	95%	named
Mimikyu [2v1]	44%	wins iff atk >= 144.53	100%	named
Dondozo [2v1]	56%	wins iff atk >= 142.85	100%	named
Mimikyu [2v2]	44%	wins iff atk >= 144.53	100%	named
Regidrago [2v2]	44%	wins iff atk >= 144.53	100%	named
Shadow Lapras [2v1]	43%	wins iff def >= 208.41	81%	named
Shadow Corviknight [2v2]	57%	wins iff hp >= 132	90%	named
Tinkaton [1v1]	58%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	87%	named
Jellicent [1v0]	60%	wins iff def >= 205.91	81%	named
Walrein [2v1]	39%	wins iff hp >= 135	95%	named
Ampharos [1v2]	38%	wins iff hp >= 135	85%	named
Seismitoad [1v0]	62%	wins iff atk >= 142.01	87%	named
Corviknight [0v0]	38%	wins iff atk >= 145.37	100%	named
Miltank [1v2]	36%	wins iff atk >= 145.78	96%	named
Ninetales [2v2]	34%	wins iff sp >= 3,993,477	87%	named
Seaking [2v2]	34%	wins iff def >= 207.55	98%	named
Bellibolt [2v1]	34%	wins iff atk >= 146.57	89%	named
Shadow Cradily [0v0]	69%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	100%	named
Shadow Cradily [1v1]	69%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	100%	named
Tinkaton [2v1]	69%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	100%	named
Cresselia [0v0]	31%	wins iff hp >= 135	85%	named
Galarian Moltres [1v0]	71%	wins iff hp >= 131	94%	named
Florges [2v1]	71%	wins iff sp >= 3,795,033	91%	named
Miltank [0v0]	71%	wins iff hp >= 130	89%	named
Shadow Cradily [2v2]	74%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	95%	named
Bellibolt [1v0]	74%	wins iff sp >= 3,777,251	84%	named
Runerigus [1v0]	25%	wins iff atk >= 146.61	100%	named
Florges [2v2]	25%	wins iff atk >= 146.96	100%	named
Runerigus [2v2]	25%	wins iff atk >= 146.96	100%	named
Cramorant [2v2]	76%	wins iff hp >= 130	96%	named
Shadow Talonflame [2v2]	77%	wins iff hp >= 128	88%	named
Dusknoir [1v1]	80%	wins iff sp >= 3,687,906	85%	named
Empoleon [1v0]	80%	wins iff hp >= 129	91%	named
Runerigus [2v1]	81%	wins iff atk >= 139.49	100%	named
Ampharos [1v1]	18%	wins iff atk >= 147.35	100%	named
Bellibolt [1v1]	18%	wins iff sp >= 4,092,004	90%	named
Alolan Ninetales [2v1]	18%	wins iff atk >= 147.35	99%	named
Melmetal [1v2]	18%	wins iff atk >= 147.79	100%	named
Melmetal [2v2]	18%	wins iff atk >= 147.79	100%	named
Blastoise [1v0]	83%	wins iff sp >= 3,722,788	94%	named
Cresselia [1v2]	17%	wins iff sp >= 4,076,684	90%	named
Alolan Muk [2v2]	16%	wins iff atk >= 148.68	95%	named
Shadow Empoleon [2v2]	84%	wins iff def >= 201.91	88%	named
Shadow Malamar [2v1]	15%	wins iff sp >= 4,105,643	92%	named
Melmetal [0v0]	15%	wins iff sp >= 4,180,013	88%	named
Shadow Corviknight [1v1]	86%	wins iff hp >= 128	92%	named
Shadow Corviknight [2v1]	86%	wins iff hp >= 128	92%	named
Seaking [1v1]	14%	wins iff sp >= 4,150,751	89%	named
Corviknight [1v2]	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,176,871	90%	named
Shadow Walrein [1v0]	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,199,036	88%	named
Giratina (Altered) [1v2]	13%	wins iff def >= 209.87	95%	named
Virizion [1v0]	88%	wins iff atk >= 138.65	100%	named
Cresselia [2v2]	88%	wins iff atk >= 138.65	100%	named
Corviknight [1v0]	88%	wins iff sp >= 3,662,962	93%	named
Skeledirge [2v2]	12%	wins iff sp < 3,615,827	91%	named
Lapras [1v0]	90%	wins iff atk >= 138.65	98%	named
Ninetales [1v1]	10%	wins iff sp >= 4,132,407	92%	named
Shadow Giratina (Altered) [2v2]	90%	wins iff hp >= 127	94%	named
Steelix [1v2]	91%	wins iff sp >= 3,626,559	93%	named
Seismitoad [2v1]	9%	wins iff sp >= 4,174,488	94%	named
Ninetales [2v1]	92%	wins iff sp >= 3,615,827	94%	named
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	8%	wins iff hp >= 139	95%	named
Seismitoad [0v0]	8%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Rillaboom [2v1]	7%	wins iff sp >= 4,211,191	94%	named
Shadow Empoleon [1v1]	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,592,268	95%	named
Empoleon [2v1]	6%	wins iff def >= 210.92	95%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [2v1]	94%	wins iff atk >= 137.81	100%	named
Seaking [0v0]	6%	wins iff sp >= 4,174,212	96%	named
Florges [1v1]	5%	wins iff atk >= 149.13	100%	named
Skeledirge [0v0]	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,537,312	96%	named
Toucannon [2v2]	4%	wins iff sp >= 4,202,718	97%	named
Feraligatr [1v0]	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,229,438	97%	named
Shadow Steelix [0v0]	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,212,492	98%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [2v2]	2%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named

Rows are ordered by discriminating power (win rate closest to 50%). "Rule accuracy" is how well that single stat threshold predicts the win/loss across all IVs, and is only shown when it beats always-predicting the majority outcome; high-accuracy UNNAMED rows are candidate new anchors. "Named" means an authored anchor names that opponent (alt-moveset / IV-variant rows inherit their base opponent's anchor).

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2980	141.5	205.3	132	#26-#4096	14.0	-
C1	1116	147.9	205.7	133	#1-#3525	24.9	Florges [2v2] (+89pp), Runerigus [2v2] (+89pp), Corviknight [0v0] (+82pp), Mimikyu [2v2] (+77pp)

Computed at bake time for moveset SHADOW_CLAW / ROCK_TOMB, SHADOW_BALL with PvPoke default opponent IVs and bait-selective shield play, over the full opponent pool; this does not follow the scatter's moveset / opponent-IV / bait dropdowns or the opponent filter.

How this works

Per shield scenario: an opponent is contested when between 2% and 98% of this dive's IV spreads beat it (everyone else is settled and can't distinguish IVs). Each IV's fingerprint is its win/loss vector over those opponents; fingerprints are clustered bottom-up (agglomerative, Hamming distance, average linkage). The number of clusters, K, is chosen by silhouette -- a 0-to-1 score of how cleanly the fingerprints separate, where above about 0.5 the clusters are distinct groups and below 0.30 the headline says "weak separation" and the clusters are tendencies rather than tiers -- under a parsimony floor (a split must keep every cluster above a minimum size, and the smallest K in 2-6 within 0.03 of the best silhouette wins). Silhouettes are comparable between the scenarios on this page, not between species. Clusters are ordered weakest to strongest by mean contested wins. The scatter panels project the same 4,096 IV spreads onto each pair of battle stats; clusters that overlap completely in score separate cleanly there. A scenario is reported as degenerate (no clustering attempted) when it has fewer than 6 contested opponents or fewer than 8 distinct win patterns -- on that little data every candidate K scores near-perfectly, which is a measurement artifact and not structure -- and its bits are left out of the all scenarios fingerprint. A scenario that clears the floor but has no split keeping every cluster above the minimum size is reported as fragmented instead, and its bits still count toward the combined view. The all scenarios bits are ordered most-discriminating first, which is the tie-break the linkage uses when several merges are equally close. Replaces the retired score-gap cluster heuristic (2026-07), which usually (~77% of sampled runs) fired on float-level jitter in the opponent-averaged score, and even when it did catch a real tier could not name which matchups defined it.

Evidence

1. Header

Runerigus -- Ultra League

SHADOW_CLAW / ROCK_TOMB, SHADOW_BALL (arm 1 of 5)

Level view: L50. Bake 2026-09-27. Blob 20260927_135154_Runerigus_ultra.replay.pkl.gz.

Opponent pool: 63 entries (Custom pool from ul_top60.txt (60 mons)). Grid: 4096 IV spreads x 9 shield scenarios.

Opponent-IV settings baked: PvPoke-default opponent IVs; PvPoke-default opponent IVs, focal never baits; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits.

Rankings snapshot 2026-09-27.

2. Floor

20 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

20 single-stat values do separate a cell exactly (20 on attack, 0 on Def, 0 on HP, over 104 contested cells), but none of them clears every gate while splitting between 25% and 60% of the grid, which is what an exact line has to do to carry a floor label.

The closest dirty thresholds on this dive, printed as evidence and not as lines:

A split is listed only when it puts fewer spreads on the wrong side than the constant rule does (predict one outcome for the whole grid) and when it keeps between 10% and 90% of the grid on each side.

cell	rank	closest split	spreads on the wrong side	constant rule gets wrong	wins at/above	wins below
2v2 Feraligatr	rank 15	HP >= 133	192	2016	1936 of 2048	80 of 2048
1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow)	rank 30	HP >= 133	224	1920	1872 of 2048	48 of 2048
2v1 Blastoise	rank 29	HP >= 133	256	1920	1856 of 2048	64 of 2048
2v1 Snorlax (Shadow)	rank 3	HP >= 134	193	1855	1726 of 1790	129 of 2306

3. Lines on the other stats

No axis carries a line on this arm, so there is nothing to compare across them.

4. Example spreads

Existence proofs; each selection rule is printed with its spread.

There is no line on this arm, so the rules run over the whole grid rather than over a set of clearers.

No spread on this grid wins more matchups than rank-1 does, so the whole IV decision here is zero matchups wide.

rule	IVs	level	Atk / Def / HP	stat product	contested cells	all cells
most cells won on the whole grid	10/15/15	L50.0	145.37 / 211.76 / 139	100.00% (#1)	87	277
bulkiest (max Def x HP) among the whole grid with SP >= 95%	2/15/15	L50.0	138.65 / 211.76 / 139	95.38% (#666)	68	258

Cells won by shield scenario

spread	0v0	0v1	0v2	1v0	1v1	1v2	2v0	2v1	2v2	total
rank-1 10/15/15	27	7	4	51	25	11	63	55	34	277
10/15/15	27	7	4	51	25	11	63	55	34	277
2/15/15	23	7	4	51	23	11	63	47	29	258

5. Rank-1 check

Stat-product rank-1 is 10/15/15 at L50.0: 145.37 attack / 211.76 Def / 139 HP. It wins 277 of 567 cells (87 of the 104 contested ones).

There is no floor on this arm, so there is no line for it to be on one side of.

The lowest material rung it misses is 146.61 (1v0 Runerigus).

It is a member of the Alternative target below.

6. Alternative target

Def >= 207.55, HP >= 127: 1411 spreads (34.4%), stat product 84.4% to 100.0% of rank-1, attack 136.97-149.57.

There is no line on this arm, so there is nothing for the rectangle to be disjoint from. Rule: among (Def, HP) rectangles with at least 100 members, the one winning the most contested cells with EVERY member that at most 1% of the spreads outside it win, counting only cells against a top-50 opponent in a non-degenerate scenario; ties broken by member count. The printed cuts are the least attained values among the members.

Wins 1 contested cell that way: 2v2 Seaking (rank 45).

Wild catches needed to land inside this rectangle: 2 for a 50% chance, 4 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

Members win 208-277 cells in total.

IV envelope of the members -- attack IV 0-15, Def IV 10-15, HP IV 1-15. Members per attack IV: 0: 90, 1: 90, 2: 90, 3: 90, 4: 90, 5: 90, 6: 90, 7: 90, 8: 90, 9: 90, 10: 90, 11: 90, 12: 89, 13: 86, 14: 81, 15: 75.

Highest stat product inside it: 10/15/15 at L50.0 (100.00% of rank-1), 11/15/15 at L49.5 (99.98% of rank-1), 10/14/15 at L50.0 (99.60% of rank-1), 11/14/15 at L49.5 (99.58% of rank-1), 11/14/14 at L50.0 (99.46% of rank-1).

7. Cost

This test finds no reverse single-stat clean cut: no cell on this dive is won by every LOW spread and lost by every high one.

8. Rungs above

No floor on this arm, so no ladder above one.

9. Material clean cuts

Clean cuts holding between 10% and 90% of the grid, ascending. The widest of them sit under nearly every spread on the grid; the narrow ones at the bottom of the table do not.

cut	cells owned	spreads	settings	mechanism
Atk >= 138.64	1v0 Virizion (rank 6), 2v2 Cresselia (rank 35)	3584 (87.5%)	2/4	1v0 Virizion: Mechanism: SHADOW_BALL damage steps 54 -> 55 across the cut. 2v2 Cresselia: Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 5 -> 6 across the cut.
Atk >= 139.48	2v1 Runerigus (rank 43)	3328 (81.2%)	2/4	Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 4 -> 5 across the cut at focal Atk stage -1.
Atk >= 141.17	0v0 Cradily (Shadow) (rank 53), 1v1 Cradily (Shadow) (rank 53), 2v1 Tinkaton (rank 1)	2816 (68.8%)	2-4 of 4	0v0 Cradily (Shadow), 1v1 Cradily (Shadow): Mechanism: SHADOW_BALL damage steps 54 -> 55 across the cut at focal Atk stage -1. 2v1 Tinkaton: Mechanism unattributed: no priority line, damage step or bulkpoint sits in the gap.
Atk >= 142.85	2v1 Dondozo (rank 26)	2304 (56.2%)	1/4	Mechanism: SHADOW_BALL damage steps 70 -> 71 across the cut.
Atk >= 143.69	2v1 Snorlax (rank 11)	2048 (50.0%)	4/4	Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 2 -> 3 across the cut.
Atk >= 144.53	2v1 Mimikyu (rank 10), 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10), 2v2 Regidrago (rank 33)	1792 (43.8%)	1-4 of 4	2v1 Mimikyu, 2v2 Mimikyu: Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 6 -> 7 across the cut. 2v2 Regidrago: Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 8 -> 9 across the cut.
Atk >= 145.37	0v0 Corviknight (rank 2)	1536 (37.5%)	2/4	Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 4 -> 5 across the cut.
Atk >= 146.61	1v0 Runerigus (rank 43)	1016 (24.8%)	4/4	Mechanism: charge-move priority against Runerigus. That Runerigus is built at 12/12/15, L49.5, 146.61 attack; 1.0 x 146.61 = 146.61, which falls in the gap (146.57, 146.62] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself. The priority line falls exactly ON the cut, so a spread sitting on it ties rather than out-prioritises; see Provenance on how the engine seats an exact tie.
Atk >= 146.96	2v2 Florges (rank 12), 2v2 Runerigus (rank 43)	1006 (24.6%)	1-4 of 4	2v2 Florges: Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 3 -> 4 across the cut at focal Atk stage -1. 2v2 Runerigus: Mechanism: SHADOW_BALL damage steps 79 -> 80 across the cut.
Atk >= 147.34	1v1 Ampharos (rank 52)	751 (18.3%)	2/4	Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 5 -> 6 across the cut.
Atk >= 147.79	1v2 Melmetal (rank 5), 2v2 Melmetal (rank 5)	724 (17.7%)	2-4 of 4	Mechanism: SHADOW_CLAW damage steps 5 -> 6 across the cut.

10. Bulk

No clean Def or HP cut exists on this dive (0 of 104 contested cells on Def, 0 on HP; 20 are attack cuts).

11. Coverage

Omitted: there is no floor on this arm, so there is no line to place.

12. Mirror

Against the pool's own Runerigus entry. Seat: our side is the optimised row; the mirror opponent always baits.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 0 231 0 1536 0 0 4096 2560 1280.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 0 0 0 1536 0 0 4096 2560 1280.

shields	win rate over the whole grid
0v0	0.02%
0v1	2.6%
0v2	0.0%
1v0	24.8%
1v1	0.0%
1v2	0.0%
2v0	100.0%
2v1	81.2%
2v2	24.6%

13. Changes the score, not the matchup

Cells won (or lost) by every spread where the battle score still steps by at least 60 at one attainable attack value.

Ordered by how close the step comes to the win line (500), nearest first: the question this field answers is how close a cell is to becoming a matchup, not how large the swing inside it is.

12 of 13 steps are listed, closest to the win line first; 1 more are not.

value	cell	rank	score step	points from 500	outcome
Atk >= 140.33	0v0 Tinkaton	rank 1	303 -> 460	40 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 140.33	1v2 Cradily (Shadow)	rank 53	269 -> 458	42 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 137.80	0v0 Forretress (Bug Bite)	rank 31	582 -> 662	82 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 148.68	2v2 Dusknoir	rank 24	344 -> 411	89 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 143.69	2v2 Snorlax	rank 11	342 -> 402	98 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 140.33	2v2 Tinkaton	rank 1	219 -> 376	124 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 140.33	0v1 Cradily (Shadow)	rank 53	183 -> 372	128 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 141.17	1v0 Cradily (Shadow)	rank 53	643 -> 892	143 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 138.64	2v0 Lapras	rank 22	669 -> 757	169 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 141.17	2v1 Cradily (Shadow)	rank 53	683 -> 841	183 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 140.33	0v1 Tinkaton	rank 1	148 -> 306	194 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 145.37	2v0 Corviknight	rank 2	701 -> 873	201 (widening)	won on both sides

14. Not claimed

84 of 104 contested matchups have no clean single-stat rule and are not claimed.

6 of 65 top-50 matchups are listed, one per base species and closest to an even split first; 59 more are not.

cell	rank	win rate over the whole grid
1v0 Mimikyu	rank 10	50.4%
2v2 Feraligatr	rank 15	49.2%
0v0 Clefable	rank 37	48.4%
2v1 Moltres (Galarian)	rank 13	51.8%
2v1 Blastoise	rank 29	46.9%
1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow)	rank 30	46.9%

15. How sure

20 clean attack cuts, 0 on Def, 0 on HP, over 104 contested cells (190 cells are won by every spread, 273 lost by every spread).

Scenarios barred from carrying a floor -- fewer than 6 contested cells, or fewer than 8 distinct opponent columns among them; the dive page's "degenerate" flag applies the same two numbers to its own stricter counts, so it can flag a different set: 0v1 (4 contested, 5 distinct opponent columns), 0v2 (2 contested, 4 distinct opponent columns), 2v0 (4 contested, 5 distinct opponent columns).

Not measured here: opponent IVs outside the baked cohorts, post-match HP and shields, XL or dust cost, and any live-game check of the priority convention.

16. Provenance

Every threshold in this section is one of three things, and each is badged where it is printed. An EXACT clean cut: every spread at or above it wins the named cell and no spread below it does. A ONE-SIDED GATE: one side is pure and the other is at least 97% pure -- either nothing below it wins (clearing it is necessary) or everything at or above it wins (clearing it is sufficient). A NEAR-EXACT split: at most 0.5% of the grid sits on the wrong side of it in total. The win predicate is gopvpsim.battle.is_win (score > 500; 500 itself is a tie, not a win).

That is stricter than the two numbers the dive page prints for the same opponent: the Threats "flips at" boundary (a 75/25 gate, so spreads on the passing side can still lose) and the Matchup clusters flip table's single-stat split for that one opponent (the most accurate such split, misclassifications allowed). The cluster line in "How sure" above is a third thing again: not one opponent but the stat rule that reproduces that section's "all scenarios" partition of the whole grid.

Priority ties: the coverage ladder counts an exact attack tie as NOT beaten. The engine is seat-dependent on an exact tie, so a tied line is not a guarantee in either direction.

Ranks and opponent builds are read live from the 2026-09-27 rankings snapshot and the current gamemaster; this blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so the render is a function of the blob plus those two live reads.

Auto-derived: this section is generated by scripts/deep_dive_brief.py from the replay blob. No human prose is in it.

How the line was selected (gates and guards)

Decision band for the floor (D1): the lowest ELIGIBLE rung whose clearer pool sits inside [25%, 60%] of the grid. Materiality band for a rung: [10%, 90%].

To be ELIGIBLE AS THE FLOOR -- not to be listed as a rung -- a cut needs at least 20 attack/20 defense/5 HP distinct attainable values below it, an opponent of rank 50 or better outside the caveat list, a non-degenerate shield scenario, a win rate at or above the cut of at least 90% in every setting, and a closed-form mechanism. Listing is a weaker bar: a rung is printed when it keeps 25% of the grid (above the floor) or sits in the materiality band (below it) AND points the same way in at least 2 settings, so a listed rung may be unattributed, low-ranked or 2-of-4.

A cut can fail several gates at once, so the failure tally below sums to more than the number of cuts.

Co-gate sub-rectangles need 5% of the grid; the alternative target needs 100 members; a score-only step needs 60 points. These constants are calibrated on one species and are parameters of the stage that uses them, not tuned per dive.

Floor pool by primitive on the attack axis -- the axis the cross-stat rule selected -- each selected on its own under the same band and the same gates: exact -> Atk >= 142.85 (2v1 Dondozo, 56.2%) rejected on G-material-gap, G-direction (1 of 4 settings); one-sided gate -> no candidate in the band; near-exact -> no candidate in the band. Selected: no floor. Selection takes the lowest eligible rung in the band; a stronger primitive within 0.50 stat points of it wins the tie, in the order exact, one-sided gate, near-exact. A gate needs 97% of its dirty side pointing the right way; a near-exact split needs at most 0.5% of the grid on the wrong side. Only exact rungs merge, in either direction.

Degradation ladder: rung reached = c. 20 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

Of 20 clean cuts, 1 clears every gate. Gate failures: G-material-gap 17, G-direction 11, G-rank 3, G-material-lo 1, G-attributed 1, G-material-hi 1.

Of 13 one-sided gate and near-exact candidates, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-material-gap 13, G-material-hi 12, G-attributed 12, G-scenario 6, G-direction 4, G-rank 3.

Closest dirty thresholds on cells with no clean rule: 2v2 Feraligatr HP >= 133 (192 spreads on the wrong side); 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) HP >= 133 (224 spreads on the wrong side); 2v1 Blastoise HP >= 133 (256 spreads on the wrong side); 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) HP >= 134 (193 spreads on the wrong side).

band	attack line it selects	cell
[25%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 55%]	no floor	-
[25%, 50%]	no floor	-
[20%, 60%]	no floor	-
[30%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 70%]	no floor	-

Terms used here

build criteria: Which shield scenarios the ranking counts: all nine equally, the three even ones, or 1v1 alone.
build: A region of the IV grid you can aim at -- every spread that clears the same combination of thresholds, at least fifty of them.
guaranteed: Won by every single spread in the region, not by most of them.
decision matchup: A (shield scenario, opponent) pair the IV choice decides: a top-50 opponent that some spreads on this grid beat and others lose to.
wide: The looser rule drawn around a region of the grid: it holds every spread that region holds and more, so it wins less for every member but is easier to hit.
stat-product rank-1 (SP1): The IV spread with the largest attack x defense x HP at this league's CP cap -- the bulk-first spread most IV tools list first. Written SP1 where it is named repeatedly.
material: A matchup no single-stat threshold of a hundred or more spreads wins more than 95% of the time, so it takes two stats at once to claim it.
opponent-IV mode: One of the ways every opponent was made for this bake -- PvPoke-default IVs or the bulkiest ones, each with and without the focal side baiting -- so a claim that holds in all of them does not depend on how the opponent was made.
stat product: Attack x defense x HP at the league's CP cap, the usual one-number summary of an IV spread.
bulk box: A rule that is a defense floor and an HP floor and nothing else -- a rectangle on the defense / HP plane.
fork: A second region with no spread in common with the first that wins a noticeably different set of matchups outright -- the two overlap on less than 80% of them -- so they are a real choice rather than two spellings of one.
outside rate: How often the spreads left OUT of a region win the same matchup its own members all win -- one the rest of the grid takes anyway is not what you bought.
charge-move priority (CMP): When both sides throw a charged move on the same turn, the higher attack stat goes first.
contested matchups: The matchups some IV spreads on this grid win and others lose -- the only ones an IV choice can change.
UpSet plot: A bar chart of set intersections: each column is one candidate region, and the dots under it mark which named sets it lies inside (Lex et al. 2014).
bulkpoint: A defense value across which an opponent's damage into you steps down by a whole point, or an HP value across which the number of hits they need to knock you out changes.
one-sided gate: A stat value with one clean side: either nothing below it wins the matchup, or everything at or above it does -- so clearing it is required, or enough, but not both.
rung: An attack value above the line at which some further matchup flips for every spread that reaches it.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 90 spreads by list	90	19 of 33 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 47 of 74 overall, 2 of them material; 29 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Ninetales (outside 14%)	13: 0v0 Melmetal, 0v0 Cresselia, +11 more	15/2/12 (80 of 189 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (19 of 33 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 47 of 74 overall), its 90 members all inside attack IV 12-15, defense IV 2-9, HP IV 9-14; that box also holds 102 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (2) 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 42% 0v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 58% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (9) 1v0 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 29% 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 54% 1v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 61% 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 79% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 14%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 70% 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (3) 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 21%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 22%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (2) 2v0 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 86% 2v1 (13) 2v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 22%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 45% 2v1 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 49% 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 52% 2v2 (12) 2v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 21% 2v2 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 29%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 29% 2v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 46% Members (90), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Def >= 201.40 and HP >= 135 (bulk box)	1522	9 of 33 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 25 of 74 overall, 0 of them material; 13 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	35: 0v0 Corviknight, 0v0 Melmetal, +33 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 90 spreads in 1522 of its own, and keeps 9 of Build 1's 19 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (25 of its 47 overall, none of them material). The 22 it gives up out here: 1v1 Ninetales (grid 16%), 1v2 Melmetal (grid 23%) and 2v2 Melmetal (grid 23%), and 19 more.
Build 2 (fork)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 346 spreads by list	346	16 of 33 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 38 of 74 overall, 2 of them material; 21 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Ninetales (outside 8%)	22: 0v0 Melmetal, 0v0 Cresselia, +20 more	14/13/7 (86 of 189 matchups)
What Build 2 guarantees (16 of 33 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 38 of 74 overall), its 346 members all inside attack IV 11-15, defense IV 0-15, HP IV 4-15; that box also holds 614 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (2) 0v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 55% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 85%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (7) 1v0 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 71% 1v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 77% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 87% 1v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 90% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 8%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 68% 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (2) 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 17%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (2) 2v0 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 85% 2v1 (10) 2v1 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 45% 2v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 48% 2v1 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 52% 2v2 (9) 2v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 42% 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 45% 2v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 45%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (346), highest stat product first
Build 3 (bulk)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 99 spreads by list	99	15 of 33 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 40 of 74 overall, 6 of them material; 21 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Skeledirge (outside 1%)	20: 0v0 Corviknight, 1v0 Virizion, +18 more	9/13/14 (86 of 189 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (15 of 33 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 40 of 74 overall), its 99 members all inside attack IV 0-11, defense IV 9-15, HP IV 14-15; that box also holds 69 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (3) 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 21% 0v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 41% 0v0 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 58% 0v1 (1) 0v1 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 (1) 0v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (9) 1v0 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 5%; material 1v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 18%; material 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 53% 1v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 61% 1v1 (6) 1v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 2%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 19%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 70% 1v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (3) 1v2 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 1%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 2%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (2) 2v0 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 86% 2v1 (9) 2v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 10%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 45% 2v1 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 51% 2v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 52% 2v2 (6) 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 66%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 82% Members (99), highest stat product first

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3992	144.1	206.4	133	#13-#4096	3.4	-
C1	104	142.4	211.5	139	#1-#1548	8.2	Virizion (+92pp), Shadow Steelix (+86pp), Ninetales (+86pp), Melmetal (+79pp); trades away Corviknight (-26pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Corviknight	44%	18%
Cresselia	40%	100%
Clefable	58%	100%
Shadow Cradily	75%	69%
Melmetal	21%	100%
Miltank	80%	100%
Shadow Steelix	8%	94%
Seaking	9%	58%
Seismitoad	8%	0%
Virizion	1%	92%
Ninetales	0%	86%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Corviknight	44%	wins iff atk >= 145.37	100%	named
Cresselia	42%	wins iff hp >= 135	87%	named
Clefable	59%	wins iff hp >= 133	89%	named
Shadow Cradily	75%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	100%	named
Melmetal	23%	wins iff hp >= 139	84%	named
Miltank	81%	wins iff hp >= 130	90%	named
Shadow Steelix	10%	wins iff atk >= 150.02	94%	named
Seaking	10%	wins iff sp >= 4,191,102	93%	named
Seismitoad	8%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Virizion	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,251,336	98%	named
Ninetales	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,259,484	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	361	141.0	203.7	128	#3018-#4096	3.2	-
C1	3735	144.3	206.8	134	#1-#4012	10.1	Galarian Moltres (+78pp), Empoleon (+74pp), Blastoise (+70pp), Mimikyu (+68pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	0%	60%
Mimikyu	0%	68%
Runerigus	0%	34%
Seismitoad	26%	78%
Jellicent	19%	79%
Galarian Moltres	8%	86%
Shadow Walrein	0%	22%
Bellibolt	29%	90%
Empoleon	21%	95%
Blastoise	27%	97%
Feraligatr	0%	8%
Virizion	75%	96%
Corviknight	39%	100%
Lapras	82%	96%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	55%	wins iff hp >= 133	95%	named
Mimikyu	62%	wins iff hp >= 132	93%	named
Runerigus	31%	wins iff atk >= 146.61	100%	named
Seismitoad	73%	wins iff atk >= 142.01	85%	named
Jellicent	74%	wins iff sp >= 3,829,346	82%	named
Galarian Moltres	79%	wins iff hp >= 130	93%	named
Shadow Walrein	20%	wins iff def >= 209.23	85%	named
Bellibolt	84%	wins iff sp >= 3,762,330	89%	named
Empoleon	88%	wins iff hp >= 129	92%	named
Blastoise	91%	wins iff sp >= 3,728,311	96%	named
Feraligatr	8%	wins iff sp >= 4,224,314	94%	named
Virizion	94%	wins iff atk >= 138.63	100%	named
Corviknight	94%	wins iff sp >= 3,675,673	96%	named
Lapras	94%	wins iff atk >= 138.63	99%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1019	139.3	206.3	133	#1050-#4096	2.9	-
C1	220	146.2	203.0	128	#1904-#4066	2.9	Shadow Cradily (+95pp), Ampharos (+42pp), Florges (+21pp); trades away Shadow Corviknight (-81pp), Dusknoir (-61pp)
C2	1744	144.1	206.7	134	#22-#3893	5.5	Tinkaton (+100pp), Shadow Corviknight (+87pp), Dusknoir (+69pp), Bellibolt (+30pp); trades away Ampharos (-42pp), Florges (-21pp)
C3	391	149.2	204.6	132	#387-#2940	6.7	Ampharos (+100pp), Florges (+51pp), Ninetales (+37pp); trades away Bellibolt (-30pp), Seaking (-24pp)
C4	175	142.1	210.9	139	#1-#1793	7.1	Seaking (+100pp), Skeledirge (+100pp), Bellibolt (+49pp), Dusknoir (+16pp); trades away Ampharos (-100pp), Florges (-51pp), Ninetales (-38pp), Shadow Cradily (-35pp)
C5	547	148.4	207.7	135	#24-#1989	8.4	Ampharos (+90pp), Ninetales (+90pp), Bellibolt (+51pp), Shadow Cradily (+35pp); trades away Skeledirge (-100pp), Seaking (-63pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2	C3	C4	C5
Tinkaton	5%	0%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Bellibolt	0%	0%	30%	0%	49%	100%
Shadow Cradily	5%	100%	100%	100%	65%	100%
Ampharos	0%	42%	0%	100%	0%	90%
Seaking	5%	0%	24%	0%	100%	37%
Ninetales	0%	0%	1%	38%	0%	90%
Dusknoir	85%	24%	93%	84%	100%	100%
Florges	0%	21%	0%	51%	0%	27%
Shadow Corviknight	94%	13%	100%	100%	100%	100%
Skeledirge	0%	0%	0%	0%	100%	0%
Shadow Empoleon	91%	89%	100%	100%	100%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Tinkaton	71%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	91%	named
Bellibolt	28%	wins iff sp >= 4,100,611	86%	named
Shadow Cradily	75%	wins iff atk >= 141.17	100%	named
Ampharos	24%	wins iff atk >= 147.35	100%	named
Seaking	21%	wins iff sp >= 4,155,380	85%	named
Ninetales	16%	wins iff atk >= 147.35	89%	named
Dusknoir	88%	wins iff sp >= 3,688,424	90%	named
Florges	10%	wins iff atk >= 149.13	100%	named
Shadow Corviknight	94%	wins iff sp >= 3,629,844	95%	named
Skeledirge	4%	wins iff sp >= 4,244,765	96%	named
Shadow Empoleon	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,592,773	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3994	144.1	206.4	133	#12-#4096	2.7	-
C1	102	141.7	211.3	139	#1-#1969	6.0	Forretress (Bug Bite) (+98pp), Skeledirge (+96pp), Giratina (Altered) (+68pp), Corviknight (+67pp); trades away Melmetal (-23pp), Cresselia (-21pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Ampharos	48%	45%
Miltank	45%	86%
Cresselia	25%	4%
Melmetal	23%	0%
Corviknight	19%	86%
Giratina (Altered)	17%	85%
Steelix	95%	100%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	2%	100%
Skeledirge	1%	97%

Moveset: Switching movesets reloads the page; pasted CSV will need to be re-loaded. Shields: Build criteria: Opponent IVs: Bait: Y-axis: Color: Anchors: Build criteria weights shield scenarios in: Which one to build?, the all-scenarios clusters, and Shields = All (by build criteria). Nothing else on this page is re-weighted by it. Threshold tiers (e.g. GH Great / GH Good) are expert stat-cutoff regions defined in Threshold Tiers below. Hover legend to isolate; click to lock.

Check my collection - Your collection stays in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Paste your Poke Genie CSV export below, or click Choose file… to load one from disk. You’ll see which of your Runerigus (and pre-evolutions) qualify for each tier, overlaid on the scatter plot.

Show only my mons

Or enter one at a time - Atk/Def/HP IVs (0-15), level, shadow flag. Same format as PvPoke / PvPIVs.

Species Atk Def HP Level Shadow

Compare candidates - up to 7 of your IV spreads, side by side: wins, mirror, and the close calls that decide the build

Add a spread: Atk Def HP 0 / 7 added

Highlight IVs:

Top IVs Rows: Ranked by this dive's battle simulation (not fetched from PvPoke). Click any column header to sort.

Battle-Rating Distribution

Per-matchup battle-rating distribution for the reference IV (PvPoke default or Rank 1, matching the Opponent-IVs dropdown) across the opponent pool, under the currently-selected Shields / Opponent-IVs / Bait.

Shadow Claw / Rock Tomb, Shadow Ball

IV Recommendations

Moveset: Shadow Claw / Rock Tomb, Shadow Ball. Vs PvPoke default opponents.

IV Flavor Guide (Simulation)

Auto-generated from simulation matchup data. Flavor names (e.g. "Premium Bulk", "Fortified {Opp}", "{Opp} Slayer") are derived from which opponents each IV cluster beats, not from the expert-authored Threshold Tiers section above. This IV Flavor Guide and the Threshold Tiers answer different questions and may not line up 1:1. New to flavor cards? The IV Flavor Guide walks through the six name families and the trade-off layout.

In Ultra League, Runerigus has 4 flavors: General Good, Fortified Empoleon, Muk (Alolan) Slayer, and Melmetal Slayer. In general, the General Good variation may be the flavor of choice, as it plays up Runerigus's potential vs Ampharos, Annihilape, Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist), among others.

Flavor	IVs	%	Catches needed
General Good [Recommended]	3150	76.9%	almost any will do
Fortified Empoleon	228	5.6%	~13-25 for a 50-75% chance
Muk (Alolan) Slayer	405	9.9%	~7-14 for a 50-75% chance
Melmetal Slayer	676	16.5%	~4-8 for a 50-75% chance

General Good (137.42 Atk, 199.16 Def, 128 HP) [Recommended]

199.16 Def and 128 HP is a safe baseline for Runerigus, with an attack floor of 137.42 Atk for coverage against key opponents.

128 HP is also a safe spot, enabling key matchups vs Ampharos, Annihilape, Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist).

199.99 Def with 128+ HP for Ampharos (1v2), Annihilape (0v1), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (0v1), Blastoise (2v1), Clefable (0v0), Corviknight (incl. Shadow) (2v2), Cramorant (2v2), Cresselia (0v0), Feraligatr (2v2), Miltank (0v0), Mimikyu (1v0), Moltres (Galarian) (1v0, 2v1), Ninetales (Alolan) (incl. Shadow) (1v0), Snorlax (incl. Shadow) (2v1), Talonflame (incl. Shadow) (2v2), Walrein (2v1), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v1, 1v1), Regidrago (2v1), Florges (2v1), Guzzlord (2v0), Jellicent (1v0, 1v1)
200.23 Def with 134+ HP for the Forretress (incl. Shadow) (1v2 no bait)
201.07 Def with 133+ HP for the Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v1 with bait)
201.91 Def with 139+ HP for the Walrein (incl. Shadow) (1v0)
202.75 Def with 135+ HP for Corviknight (1v2), Lapras (incl. Shadow) (2v1)
203.59 Def with 133+ HP for Jellicent (1v1), Melmetal (0v0)
204.42 Def with 134+ HP for the Forretress (incl. Shadow) (1v2 no bait)
205.91 Def with 139+ HP for Seaking (2v2), Walrein (incl. Shadow) (1v0), Giratina (Altered) (1v2)

Fortified Empoleon (210.29 Def, 133 HP)

The "Fortified Empoleon" Runerigus fortifies its bulk to gain several matchups including the Empoleon 2v1, 2v2, the Forretress (Bug Bite) 0v1, 2v2, the Forretress (Shadow) 1v2. This requires 210.29 Def with 133 HP.

Muk (Alolan) Slayer (148.29 Atk, 127 HP)

The "Muk (Alolan) Slayer" Runerigus trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Muk (Alolan) 2v2, the Ampharos 1v1, the Corviknight 0v0. Runerigus would need 148.29 Atk while maintaining 127 HP.

Melmetal Slayer (147.74 Atk, 127 HP)

The "Melmetal Slayer" Runerigus trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Melmetal 1v2, 2v2, the Ampharos 1v1, the Bellibolt 2v1. Runerigus would need 147.74 Atk while maintaining 127 HP.

Rank-1 Runerigus (10/15/15) meets the General Good thresholds.

Simulation-Derived IV Tiers

Auto-derived from the sim (not expert-authored).

Threshold Tiers

Stat-target headlines from thresholds/*.toml, each grouped with the named anchors its spec clears and the IV spreads that meet it. Within each tier card, bullets are grouped by opponent and sorted by the required stat (Def or Atk) ascending - read top-to-bottom in the order a player would clear them as their stat grows. The flat list of every anchor (regardless of tier) lives in Anchor-Driven Matchup Flips below. New to tier cards? The Threshold Tiers guide walks through what the stat cutoffs and member counts mean. A tier's anchors come from two passes over the anchor list:

Primary bullets - the tier has a cutoff on the anchor's target axis (atk or def) that meets or exceeds the anchor's threshold. Consequences:
- Subset case: if tier A is strictly stricter than tier B on the anchor axis, A's bullet list is a superset of B's. Overlap is intentional.
- Crossed-cutoff case: tier A has only an atk cutoff, tier B has only a def cutoff - neither is a subset of the other. Atk anchors appear only on A; def anchors only on B.
- Slayer-axis IV-count case: two tiers can list the same atk anchor but have different member-IV counts because a stricter tier's def cutoff excludes def-sacrificing spreads that the looser tier keeps. Check the (−N vs parent) callout on the tier header to spot this at a glance.
Anchors we get for free (collapsed) - the tier has no cutoff on the anchor's target axis, but every IV in the tier clears the anchor's threshold anyway. These would be silently dropped by the primary filter; we surface them in a separate collapsed block so the card isn't misleading.

Fortified Empoleon · def≥210.29, hp≥133 (228 IV spreads) (−752 vs Virizion Bulk (def-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 154 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Annihilape, Blastoise, Clefable, +30 more. Matchup flips vs Empoleon (2 scenarios, 324 IVs).

199.58 Def + 135 HP for Corviknight (Payback) vs Corviknight (1v2, 2v2)
201.57 Def + 135 HP for Corviknight (Sky Attack) vs Corviknight (1v2, 2v2)
201.57 Def + 135 HP for Corviknight (Air Cutter) vs Corviknight (1v2, 2v2)
203.06 Def + 136 HP for Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Corviknight (1v2, 2v2)
199.82 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
200.09 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Superpower) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
200.26 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
200.31 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
200.71 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
202.24 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Outrage) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
199.16 Def + 130 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Payback) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v2 with bait)
199.37 Def + 130 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v2 with bait)
201.57 Def + 130 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Sky Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v2 with bait)
201.70 Def + 135 HP for Melmetal (Flash Cannon) vs Melmetal (0v0)
201.70 Def + 135 HP for Melmetal (Double Iron Bash) vs Melmetal (0v0)
203.76 Def + 137 HP for Melmetal (Hyper Beam) vs Melmetal (0v0)
205.54 Def + 136 HP for Melmetal (Rock Slide) vs Melmetal (0v0)
208.56 Def + 135 HP for Melmetal (Thunderbolt) vs Melmetal (0v0)
208.56 Def + 135 HP for Melmetal (Dynamic Punch) vs Melmetal (0v0)
209.28 Def + 135 HP for Melmetal (Superpower) vs Melmetal (0v0)
209.20 Def + 139 HP for Virizion (Leaf Blade) vs Virizion (0v0)
206.84 Def + 132 HP for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
206.89 Def + 131 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
207.29 Def + 132 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
207.39 Def + 133 HP for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
199.25 Def + 131 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Claw) vs Mimikyu (1v0)
199.25 Def + 131 HP for Mimikyu (Hex) vs Mimikyu (1v0)
199.25 Def + 130 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (1v0)
200.14 Def + 131 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (1v0)
202.69 Def + 130 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (1v0)
199.21 Def + 128 HP for Galarian Moltres (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (1v0)
199.42 Def + 128 HP for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (1v0)
199.78 Def + 132 HP for Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Feraligatr (1v0, 2v2)
200.18 Def + 131 HP for Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v0, 2v2)
201.15 Def + 132 HP for Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Feraligatr (1v0, 2v2)
201.32 Def + 132 HP for Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v0, 2v2)
204.71 Def + 127 HP for Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2 with bait)
204.91 Def + 130 HP for Giratina Altered (Ancient Power) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2 with bait)
205.54 Def + 127 HP for Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2 with bait)
206.39 Def + 127 HP for Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2 with bait)
199.82 Def + 128 HP for Cramorant (Surf) vs Cramorant (2v2)
206.58 Def + 137 HP for Skeledirge (Blast Burn) vs Skeledirge (1v1 with bait)
206.80 Def + 137 HP for Skeledirge (Shadow Ball) vs Skeledirge (1v1 with bait)
207.15 Def + 137 HP for Skeledirge (Crunch) vs Skeledirge (1v1 with bait)
207.29 Def + 137 HP for Skeledirge (Flamethrower) vs Skeledirge (1v1 with bait)
208.41 Def + 137 HP for Skeledirge (Torch Song) vs Skeledirge (1v1 with bait)
209.43 Def + 138 HP for Skeledirge (Disarming Voice) vs Skeledirge (1v1 with bait)
200.42 Def + 137 HP for Rillaboom (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (2v1 with bait)
201.27 Def + 137 HP for Rillaboom (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (2v1 with bait)
202.33 Def + 137 HP for Rillaboom (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (2v1 with bait)
202.33 Def + 137 HP for Rillaboom (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (2v1 with bait)
203.24 Def + 137 HP for Rillaboom (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (2v1 with bait)
202.91 Def for Shadow Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
203.19 Def for Shadow Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
203.37 Def for Shadow Lapras (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
203.56 Def for Shadow Lapras (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
203.79 Def for Shadow Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
204.12 Def for Shadow Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
204.47 Def for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
199.59 Def + 132 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (2v1 with bait)
199.59 Def + 132 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (2v1 with bait)
201.08 Def + 132 HP for Blastoise (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (2v1 with bait)
201.79 Def + 132 HP for Blastoise (Flash Cannon) vs Blastoise (2v1 with bait)
199.40 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
199.76 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
200.18 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
200.18 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
201.74 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
202.56 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
206.21 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Energy Ball) vs Ninetales (0v0)
206.37 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Fire Blast) vs Ninetales (0v0)
206.89 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Scorching Sands) vs Ninetales (0v0)
206.89 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Solar Beam) vs Ninetales (0v0)
207.17 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Overheat) vs Ninetales (0v0)
208.11 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Flamethrower) vs Ninetales (0v0)
208.11 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Ninetales (0v0)
208.46 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Ninetales (0v0)
199.96 Def + 132 HP for Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Cresselia (0v0)
200.85 Def + 132 HP for Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Cresselia (0v0)
200.85 Def + 132 HP for Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Cresselia (0v0)
202.16 Def + 132 HP for Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Cresselia (0v0)
205.92 Def + 137 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
208.00 Def + 138 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
208.00 Def + 138 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
209.47 Def + 138 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
199.55 Def + 130 HP for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (0v0)
199.55 Def + 130 HP for Clefable (Moonblast) vs Clefable (0v0)
199.85 Def + 130 HP for Clefable (Meteor Mash) vs Clefable (0v0)
200.02 Def + 131 HP for Clefable (Draining Kiss) vs Clefable (0v0)
201.45 Def + 131 HP for Clefable (Charm) vs Clefable (0v0)
204.02 Def + 130 HP for Clefable (Psychic) vs Clefable (0v0)
199.62 Def + 133 HP for Walrein (Waterfall) vs Walrein (2v1)
200.05 Def + 132 HP for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (2v1)
201.64 Def + 132 HP for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (2v1)
201.64 Def + 132 HP for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (2v1)
202.54 Def + 133 HP for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (2v1)
201.91 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
202.58 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
203.14 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
203.25 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
207.01 Def for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
207.55 Def for Seaking (Peck) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
207.55 Def for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
207.55 Def for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
207.55 Def for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
209.84 Def for Seaking (Megahorn) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
208.65 Def + 139 HP for Shadow Steelix (Crunch) vs Shadow Steelix (0v0)
209.09 Def + 139 HP for Shadow Steelix (Earthquake) vs Shadow Steelix (0v0)
199.27 Def + 132 HP for Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
199.55 Def + 132 HP for Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
199.55 Def + 134 HP for Ampharos (Thunder) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
199.55 Def + 134 HP for Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
201.16 Def + 133 HP for Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
201.25 Def + 132 HP for Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
201.93 Def + 132 HP for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
202.25 Def + 132 HP for Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
199.30 Def + 137 HP for Shadow Malamar (Psybeam) vs Shadow Malamar (2v2 with bait)
200.07 Def + 137 HP for Shadow Malamar (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (2v2 with bait)
204.45 Def + 138 HP for Shadow Malamar (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Malamar (2v2 with bait)
207.32 Def + 137 HP for Shadow Malamar (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (2v2 with bait)
199.28 Def for Shadow Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
199.28 Def for Shadow Talonflame (Flame Charge) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
200.30 Def for Shadow Talonflame (Incinerate) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
200.30 Def for Shadow Talonflame (Fire Blast) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
200.30 Def for Shadow Talonflame (Fly) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
200.72 Def + 130 HP for Annihilape (Shadow Ball) vs Annihilape (0v1 with bait)
201.72 Def + 129 HP for Annihilape (Night Slash) vs Annihilape (0v1 with bait)
201.92 Def + 129 HP for Annihilape (Close Combat) vs Annihilape (0v1 with bait)
202.17 Def + 129 HP for Annihilape (Rage Fist) vs Annihilape (0v1 with bait)
200.75 Def + 129 HP for Jellicent (Ice Beam) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
200.75 Def + 131 HP for Jellicent (Bubble Beam) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
200.75 Def + 129 HP for Jellicent (Surf) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
201.26 Def + 129 HP for Jellicent (Shadow Ball) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
201.90 Def + 129 HP for Jellicent (Bubble) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
206.10 Def + 129 HP for Jellicent (Hex) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
205.50 Def + 137 HP for Forretress (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v1 no bait)
207.22 Def + 137 HP for Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Forretress (0v1 no bait)
208.21 Def + 137 HP for Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Forretress (0v1 no bait)
208.21 Def + 137 HP for Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Forretress (0v1 no bait)
210.24 Def + 136 HP for Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (0v1, 0v2 no bait)
200.53 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
202.01 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
202.44 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Forretress (Earthquake) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
203.78 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
206.04 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Forretress (Volt Switch) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
206.40 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
205.23 Def + 139 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
205.23 Def + 139 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
205.23 Def + 139 HP for Shadow Cradily (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
205.59 Def + 137 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
208.49 Def + 138 HP for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
210.16 Def + 137 HP for Shadow Cradily (Bullet Seed) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
199.18 Def for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (2v0)
206.57 Def + 139 HP for Registeel (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (0v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

199.99 Def + 130 HP flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (0v1 with bait) [2880 IVs]
199.99 Def + 128 HP flips Miltank (0v0) [3360 IVs]
201.07 Def + 133 HP flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v1 with bait) [1664 IVs]
199.99 Def + 128 HP flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (1v1 no bait) [3360 IVs]
199.99 Def + 128 HP flips Regidrago (2v1 no bait) [3360 IVs]
199.99 Def + 128 HP flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (0v1 with bait) [3360 IVs]
199.99 Def + 129 HP flips Florges (2v1 with bait) [3120 IVs]
199.99 Def + 130 HP flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v1 with bait) [2880 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v1, 2v2)

Member IVs (228)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
11/15/15 👑	145.78	211.13	139	#1	+9	+0.5	+0.4	+1.9
10/15/15 👑	145.37	211.76	139	#3	+7	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
10/14/15	145.37	210.92	139	#4	+4	-0.5	-0.1	-0.3
11/14/15	145.78	210.29	139	#5	+7	-1.9	-0.7	+0.5
12/14/14 👑	146.61	210.29	138	#6	+0	-6.2	+0.4	+0.4
13/14/12 👑	147.45	210.29	136	#8	-1	-6.4	+6.7	+0.1
12/15/13 👑	146.61	211.13	137	#9	-1	-7.9	+3.3	-0.5
12/14/13	146.61	210.29	137	#21	-4	-7.4	+3.0	-1.7
11/15/14	145.78	211.13	138	#22	-2	-8.0	-0.9	-1.5
12/15/11 👑	147.05	211.76	136	#23	-6	-7.8	+2.2	-0.1
9/15/15	144.53	211.76	139	#24	+0	-4.0	-0.6	-0.2
11/14/14 👑	146.21	210.92	138	#28	-1	-7.9	-0.5	-1.3
12/14/11	147.05	210.92	136	#36	-8	-8.3	+2.1	-0.4
12/14/12	147.05	210.92	136	#37	-8	-8.3	+2.1	-0.4
9/14/15	144.53	210.92	139	#38	+0	-4.6	-0.7	-0.5
13/14/10 👑	147.89	210.92	135	#40	-3	-8.1	+2.1	+3.3
12/15/12	146.61	211.13	136	#45	-11	-8.8	+1.7	-3.9
10/15/14	145.37	211.76	138	#49	-6	-8.5	-1.3	-3.0
12/15/15	146.18	210.50	138	#52	-3	-8.2	-0.8	-2.6
13/15/12	147.01	210.50	136	#54	-10	-8.7	+1.9	-1.5
13/15/13	147.01	210.50	136	#55	-10	-8.7	+1.9	-1.5
11/15/13 👑	146.21	211.76	137	#57	-4	-8.5	+2.4	-3.3
14/15/11	147.85	210.50	135	#63	-7	-8.4	+1.9	+2.1
10/14/14	145.37	210.92	138	#75	-10	-9.1	-1.4	-3.5
11/14/13	146.21	210.92	137	#83	-4	-9.1	+2.1	-3.4
8/15/15	143.69	211.76	139	#88	+0	-6.3	-3.0	-5.8
15/15/8 👑	149.13	211.13	133	#95	+0	-10.0	+2.3	+2.8
13/15/11 👑	147.45	211.13	135	#96	-5	-9.1	+1.2	-0.3
12/15/14	146.18	210.50	137	#109	-7	-9.4	+1.9	-4.6
14/14/8	148.73	210.92	133	#114	+0	-10.5	+1.2	+2.5
8/14/15	143.69	210.92	139	#116	+0	-6.8	-3.0	-6.1
10/15/13	145.37	211.76	137	#117	-11	-9.7	+1.4	-5.5
14/15/9 👑	148.29	211.13	134	#124	+0	-10.1	+0.3	+2.4
13/15/9 👑	147.89	211.76	134	#139	+0	-10.2	+0.2	+0.7
13/14/11	147.45	210.29	135	#140	-8	-9.6	+0.9	-1.5
13/14/9	147.89	210.92	134	#153	+0	-10.4	+0.0	+0.1
9/15/14	144.53	211.76	138	#154	+0	-12.6	-1.9	-3.2
10/14/13	145.37	210.92	137	#156	-12	-10.3	+1.2	-5.6
15/14/8	149.13	210.29	133	#157	+0	-10.5	+1.8	-0.3
7/15/15	142.85	211.76	139	#165	+0	-8.2	-4.5	-7.2
11/15/11	146.21	211.76	136	#171	-12	-9.5	-3.0	-7.7
11/15/12	146.21	211.76	136	#172	-12	-9.5	-3.0	-7.7
14/14/9	148.29	210.29	134	#181	+0	-11.0	-0.3	+0.7
14/14/10	148.29	210.29	134	#182	+0	-11.0	-0.3	+0.7
15/15/9	148.68	210.50	133	#184	+0	-10.9	+0.7	-0.5
14/15/10	147.85	210.50	134	#194	+0	-10.7	-0.5	-1.1
9/14/14	144.53	210.92	138	#198	+0	-13.2	-2.0	-3.7
7/14/15	142.85	210.92	139	#200	+0	-8.8	-4.6	-7.5
6/15/15	142.01	211.76	139	#202	+0	-8.8	-5.1	-7.8
11/14/11	146.21	210.92	136	#206	-14	-9.9	-3.1	-8.0
… 178 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Muk (Alolan) Slayer · atk≥148.29, hp≥127 (405 IV spreads) (−271 vs Melmetal Slayer (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 63 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Bellibolt, Corviknight, +23 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Muk (Alolan) (3 scenario flips).

138.91 Atk for Tinkaton (Shadow Ball) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v1)
139.66 Atk for Tinkaton (Rock Tomb) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v1)
142.89 Atk for Corviknight (Shadow Ball) vs Corviknight (0v0)
142.98 Atk for Corviknight (Rock Tomb) vs Corviknight (0v0)
145.31 Atk for Corviknight (Shadow Claw) vs Corviknight (0v0)
147.74 Atk for Melmetal (Shadow Claw) vs Melmetal (1v2, 2v2)
147.74 Atk for Melmetal (Shadow Ball) vs Melmetal (1v2, 2v2)
138.47 Atk for Virizion (Shadow Ball) vs Virizion (1v0)
147.71 Atk for Virizion (Rock Tomb) vs Virizion (1v0)
142.49 Atk for Mimikyu (Shadow Ball) vs Mimikyu (2v1, 2v2)
143.86 Atk for Mimikyu (Rock Tomb) vs Mimikyu (2v1, 2v2)
144.09 Atk for Mimikyu (Shadow Claw) vs Mimikyu (2v1, 2v2)
142.66 Atk for Snorlax (Rock Tomb) vs Snorlax (2v1)
143.56 Atk for Snorlax (Shadow Claw) vs Snorlax (2v1)
143.56 Atk for Snorlax (Shadow Ball) vs Snorlax (2v1)
146.21 Atk for Florges (Shadow Ball) vs Florges (2v2 with bait)
146.63 Atk for Florges (Rock Tomb) vs Florges (2v2 with bait)
137.42 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
137.64 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
137.64 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
138.31 Atk for Lapras (Rock Tomb) vs Lapras (1v0)
143.01 Atk for Lapras (Shadow Ball) vs Lapras (1v0)
147.16 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Claw) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
147.16 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Ball) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
147.90 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Rock Tomb) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
140.37 Atk for Dondozo (Shadow Ball) vs Dondozo (2v1)
140.61 Atk for Dondozo (Rock Tomb) vs Dondozo (2v1)
143.05 Atk for Regidrago (Shadow Ball) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
143.67 Atk for Regidrago (Rock Tomb) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
144.25 Atk for Regidrago (Shadow Claw) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
146.36 Atk for Ninetales (Shadow Claw) vs Ninetales (2v2)
146.36 Atk for Ninetales (Shadow Ball) vs Ninetales (2v2)
147.09 Atk for Ninetales (Rock Tomb) vs Ninetales (2v2)
138.36 Atk for Cresselia (Shadow Claw) vs Cresselia (2v2)
138.36 Atk for Cresselia (Shadow Ball) vs Cresselia (2v2)
140.27 Atk for Cresselia (Rock Tomb) vs Cresselia (2v2)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Shadow Claw) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Shadow Ball) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
137.44 Atk for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (1v0, 2v1, 2v2)
139.30 Atk for Runerigus (Shadow Claw) vs Runerigus (2v1)
143.78 Atk for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (1v0)
147.03 Atk for Ampharos (Rock Tomb) vs Ampharos (1v1)
147.27 Atk for Ampharos (Shadow Claw) vs Ampharos (1v1)
147.27 Atk for Ampharos (Shadow Ball) vs Ampharos (1v1)
137.60 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
138.10 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
145.38 Atk for Bellibolt (Shadow Ball) vs Bellibolt (2v1 with bait)
145.38 Atk for Bellibolt (Rock Tomb) vs Bellibolt (2v1 with bait)
139.63 Atk for Seismitoad (Shadow Ball) vs Seismitoad (1v0)
141.52 Atk for Seismitoad (Shadow Claw) vs Seismitoad (1v0)
145.19 Atk for Miltank (Shadow Ball) vs Miltank (1v2)
145.58 Atk for Miltank (Rock Tomb) vs Miltank (1v2)
137.70 Atk for Forretress (Shadow Ball) vs Forretress (0v1, 1v2 no bait)
138.42 Atk for Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (0v1, 1v2 no bait)
137.44 Atk for Guzzlord (Shadow Ball) vs Guzzlord (2v0)
138.58 Atk for Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
141.60 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v0)
142.21 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v0)
145.23 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v0)
141.38 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
142.19 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
137.45 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
139.02 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

137.81 Atk flips Rillaboom (1v0) [3840 IVs]

Member IVs (405)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/10/11 👑	148.73	207.55	136	#44	-6	-6.9	-1.3	+6.1
15/4/15 👑	149.13	201.91	139	#53	-10	-11.5	+0.6	+6.3
14/4/15 👑	148.73	202.51	139	#58	-14	-11.6	-0.0	+6.7
14/13/9 👑	148.73	210.07	134	#78	+0	-9.5	+1.5	+4.8
15/13/11 👑	148.68	208.82	135	#86	-8	-8.4	-0.4	+4.8
15/15/8 👑	149.13	211.13	133	#95	+0	-10.0	+2.3	+2.8
14/3/15	148.73	201.67	139	#100	-15	-13.4	-0.8	+5.8
14/11/10 👑	148.73	208.39	135	#101	-8	-8.8	-0.9	+4.4
15/12/11	148.68	207.99	135	#104	-10	-9.2	-2.8	+4.4
15/13/9 👑	149.13	209.45	134	#108	+0	-9.5	+1.9	+3.8
15/14/10	148.68	209.66	134	#113	+0	-9.7	+1.0	+3.9
14/14/8	148.73	210.92	133	#114	+0	-10.5	+1.2	+2.5
15/3/15	149.13	201.07	139	#115	-13	-13.6	-0.5	+2.6
15/11/12	148.68	207.15	136	#122	-12	-9.4	-3.4	+4.0
14/9/11	148.73	206.71	136	#127	-12	-9.4	-3.4	+3.8
15/1/15 👑	149.57	199.99	139	#129	-13	-14.3	-0.5	+1.9
15/2/15	149.13	200.23	139	#134	-14	-14.5	-0.7	+2.0
14/12/9	148.73	209.23	134	#141	+0	-10.0	+0.7	+3.4
14/10/10	148.73	207.55	135	#146	-11	-9.8	-3.0	+0.9
14/2/15	148.73	200.83	139	#152	-16	-14.2	-1.8	+2.2
15/7/15 👑	148.68	203.81	138	#155	-13	-13.6	-1.2	+2.0
15/14/8	149.13	210.29	133	#157	+0	-10.5	+1.8	-0.3
15/5/14 👑	149.13	202.75	138	#162	-14	-14.0	-0.6	+1.7
14/1/15	148.73	199.99	139	#164	-17	-15.0	-1.9	+1.6
15/10/12	148.68	206.32	136	#167	-14	-11.1	-3.7	+3.7
15/10/13	148.68	206.32	136	#168	-14	-11.1	-3.7	+3.7
15/7/13 👑	149.13	204.42	137	#169	-12	-11.5	-0.8	+0.6
14/7/13 👑	148.73	205.03	137	#173	-14	-11.7	-3.5	+1.0
14/5/14 👑	148.73	203.35	138	#178	-14	-14.3	-1.8	+1.6
15/15/9	148.68	210.50	133	#184	+0	-10.9	+0.7	-0.5
15/8/14	148.68	204.65	137	#185	-15	-11.7	-3.9	+0.9
15/6/15	148.68	202.98	138	#187	-15	-14.5	-1.9	+1.5
14/13/8	148.73	210.07	133	#191	+0	-11.3	+0.6	-0.7
15/12/8 👑	149.57	209.23	133	#195	+0	-11.1	-0.4	+0.0
15/10/11 👑	149.13	206.94	135	#210	-11	-12.1	-4.3	-1.0
14/4/14	148.73	202.51	138	#212	-18	-14.6	-1.9	+1.4
15/12/9	149.13	208.61	134	#214	+0	-10.3	-1.2	-0.9
15/4/14	149.13	201.91	138	#217	-15	-14.4	-1.6	+0.9
14/8/11	148.73	205.87	136	#223	-16	-11.6	-5.2	+2.3
14/8/12	148.73	205.87	136	#224	-16	-11.6	-5.2	+2.3
15/13/8	149.13	209.45	133	#225	+0	-11.3	-0.6	+0.1
15/6/13	149.13	203.59	137	#227	-14	-14.4	-3.6	+0.4
15/13/10	148.68	208.82	134	#228	+0	-10.1	-2.0	-0.8
15/5/15	148.68	202.14	138	#232	-18	-14.9	-2.2	+1.1
14/6/13	148.73	204.19	137	#234	-16	-14.7	-2.8	+0.3
15/9/12	148.68	205.48	136	#235	-16	-12.0	-5.4	+1.9
15/9/13	148.68	205.48	136	#236	-16	-12.0	-5.4	+1.9
15/11/11	148.68	207.15	135	#237	-15	-12.6	-5.3	-1.2
14/9/10	148.73	206.71	135	#240	-15	-12.7	-5.3	-1.4
15/9/11	149.13	206.10	135	#243	-14	-12.4	-4.7	-2.3
… 355 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Melmetal Slayer · atk≥147.74, hp≥127 (676 IV spreads) (−75 vs Ninetales (Alolan) Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 60 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Bellibolt, Corviknight, +22 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Melmetal (6 scenario flips).

138.91 Atk for Tinkaton (Shadow Ball) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v1)
139.66 Atk for Tinkaton (Rock Tomb) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v1)
142.89 Atk for Corviknight (Shadow Ball) vs Corviknight (0v0)
142.98 Atk for Corviknight (Rock Tomb) vs Corviknight (0v0)
145.31 Atk for Corviknight (Shadow Claw) vs Corviknight (0v0)
147.74 Atk for Melmetal (Shadow Claw) vs Melmetal (1v2, 2v2)
147.74 Atk for Melmetal (Shadow Ball) vs Melmetal (1v2, 2v2)
138.47 Atk for Virizion (Shadow Ball) vs Virizion (1v0)
147.71 Atk for Virizion (Rock Tomb) vs Virizion (1v0)
142.49 Atk for Mimikyu (Shadow Ball) vs Mimikyu (2v1, 2v2)
143.86 Atk for Mimikyu (Rock Tomb) vs Mimikyu (2v1, 2v2)
144.09 Atk for Mimikyu (Shadow Claw) vs Mimikyu (2v1, 2v2)
142.66 Atk for Snorlax (Rock Tomb) vs Snorlax (2v1)
143.56 Atk for Snorlax (Shadow Claw) vs Snorlax (2v1)
143.56 Atk for Snorlax (Shadow Ball) vs Snorlax (2v1)
146.21 Atk for Florges (Shadow Ball) vs Florges (2v2 with bait)
146.63 Atk for Florges (Rock Tomb) vs Florges (2v2 with bait)
137.42 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
137.64 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
137.64 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
138.31 Atk for Lapras (Rock Tomb) vs Lapras (1v0)
143.01 Atk for Lapras (Shadow Ball) vs Lapras (1v0)
147.16 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Claw) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
147.16 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Ball) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
140.37 Atk for Dondozo (Shadow Ball) vs Dondozo (2v1)
140.61 Atk for Dondozo (Rock Tomb) vs Dondozo (2v1)
143.05 Atk for Regidrago (Shadow Ball) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
143.67 Atk for Regidrago (Rock Tomb) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
144.25 Atk for Regidrago (Shadow Claw) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
146.36 Atk for Ninetales (Shadow Claw) vs Ninetales (2v2)
146.36 Atk for Ninetales (Shadow Ball) vs Ninetales (2v2)
147.09 Atk for Ninetales (Rock Tomb) vs Ninetales (2v2)
138.36 Atk for Cresselia (Shadow Claw) vs Cresselia (2v2)
138.36 Atk for Cresselia (Shadow Ball) vs Cresselia (2v2)
140.27 Atk for Cresselia (Rock Tomb) vs Cresselia (2v2)
137.44 Atk for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (1v0, 2v1, 2v2)
139.30 Atk for Runerigus (Shadow Claw) vs Runerigus (2v1)
143.78 Atk for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (1v0)
147.03 Atk for Ampharos (Rock Tomb) vs Ampharos (1v1)
147.27 Atk for Ampharos (Shadow Claw) vs Ampharos (1v1)
147.27 Atk for Ampharos (Shadow Ball) vs Ampharos (1v1)
137.60 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
138.10 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
145.38 Atk for Bellibolt (Shadow Ball) vs Bellibolt (2v1 with bait)
145.38 Atk for Bellibolt (Rock Tomb) vs Bellibolt (2v1 with bait)
139.63 Atk for Seismitoad (Shadow Ball) vs Seismitoad (1v0)
141.52 Atk for Seismitoad (Shadow Claw) vs Seismitoad (1v0)
145.19 Atk for Miltank (Shadow Ball) vs Miltank (1v2)
145.58 Atk for Miltank (Rock Tomb) vs Miltank (1v2)
137.70 Atk for Forretress (Shadow Ball) vs Forretress (0v1, 1v2 no bait)
138.42 Atk for Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (0v1, 1v2 no bait)
137.44 Atk for Guzzlord (Shadow Ball) vs Guzzlord (2v0)
138.58 Atk for Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
141.60 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v0)
142.21 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v0)
145.23 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v0)
141.38 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
142.19 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
137.45 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
139.02 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

137.81 Atk flips Rillaboom (1v0) [3840 IVs]

Member IVs (676)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/13/11 👑	147.89	210.07	136	#2	+1	-6.0	+7.6	+3.4
14/14/12	147.85	209.66	136	#7	+0	-6.5	+6.8	+2.6
13/12/11	147.89	209.23	136	#10	+0	-7.0	+7.5	+2.1
15/15/13	147.79	209.24	136	#12	+0	-7.0	+7.5	+2.1
14/10/15 👑	147.85	206.32	138	#25	-9	-9.8	+2.2	+3.1
15/13/15 👑	147.79	207.57	137	#29	-5	-6.5	+0.7	+2.7
14/7/15 👑	148.29	204.42	139	#39	-9	-8.8	+1.6	+2.8
13/14/10 👑	147.89	210.92	135	#40	-3	-8.1	+2.1	+3.3
15/10/15 👑	148.24	205.70	138	#41	-8	-10.2	+1.3	+3.5
14/10/11 👑	148.73	207.55	136	#44	-6	-6.9	-1.3	+6.1
13/8/14 👑	147.89	205.87	138	#51	-11	-10.2	+1.2	+1.7
15/4/15 👑	149.13	201.91	139	#53	-10	-11.5	+0.6	+6.3
14/4/15 👑	148.73	202.51	139	#58	-14	-11.6	-0.0	+6.7
14/15/11	147.85	210.50	135	#63	-7	-8.4	+1.9	+2.1
14/10/13 👑	148.29	206.94	137	#65	-8	-8.7	-1.2	+1.9
14/13/12	147.85	208.82	136	#71	-7	-7.4	+2.8	+0.7
14/13/13	147.85	208.82	136	#72	-7	-7.4	+2.8	+0.7
13/13/10	147.89	210.07	135	#73	-6	-8.7	+1.7	+1.7
14/11/14 👑	147.85	207.15	137	#76	-11	-9.1	-1.5	+0.1
13/6/15	147.89	204.19	139	#77	-12	-11.8	+0.9	+2.6
14/13/9 👑	148.73	210.07	134	#78	+0	-9.5	+1.5	+4.8
15/13/13 👑	148.24	208.20	136	#79	-5	-7.9	+2.5	+2.0
15/12/15	147.79	206.74	137	#81	-11	-9.2	-1.5	+0.0
13/9/13	147.89	206.71	137	#82	-11	-9.1	-1.5	-0.1
14/9/15	147.85	205.48	138	#84	-13	-10.8	+0.9	-1.3
15/13/11 👑	148.68	208.82	135	#86	-8	-8.4	-0.4	+4.8
13/11/11	147.89	208.39	136	#89	-7	-8.0	+2.3	+0.3
13/11/12	147.89	208.39	136	#90	-7	-8.0	+2.3	+0.3
15/14/13	147.79	208.41	136	#92	-7	-8.0	+2.2	+0.3
15/14/14	147.79	208.41	136	#93	-7	-8.0	+2.2	+0.3
15/11/14	148.24	206.53	137	#94	-9	-10.5	-1.4	+1.6
15/15/8 👑	149.13	211.13	133	#95	+0	-10.0	+2.3	+2.8
14/3/15	148.73	201.67	139	#100	-15	-13.4	-0.8	+5.8
14/11/10 👑	148.73	208.39	135	#101	-8	-8.8	-0.9	+4.4
14/6/15	148.29	203.59	139	#103	-10	-11.8	-0.8	+3.1
15/12/11	148.68	207.99	135	#104	-10	-9.2	-2.8	+4.4
15/13/9 👑	149.13	209.45	134	#108	+0	-9.5	+1.9	+3.8
14/10/14	147.85	206.32	137	#110	-12	-10.9	-1.7	-0.2
14/9/13	148.29	206.10	137	#112	-9	-11.0	-1.7	+1.1
15/14/10	148.68	209.66	134	#113	+0	-9.7	+1.0	+3.9
14/14/8	148.73	210.92	133	#114	+0	-10.5	+1.2	+2.5
15/3/15	149.13	201.07	139	#115	-13	-13.6	-0.5	+2.6
14/12/12	147.85	207.99	136	#119	-10	-8.4	+0.4	+0.1
14/12/13	147.85	207.99	136	#120	-10	-8.4	+0.4	+0.1
14/13/11 👑	148.29	209.45	135	#121	-5	-9.5	+0.3	+1.9
15/11/12	148.68	207.15	136	#122	-12	-9.4	-3.4	+4.0
14/15/9 👑	148.29	211.13	134	#124	+0	-10.1	+0.3	+2.4
14/14/11	147.85	209.66	135	#125	-8	-9.4	+0.3	+0.5
14/9/11	148.73	206.71	136	#127	-12	-9.4	-3.4	+3.8
15/1/15 👑	149.57	199.99	139	#129	-13	-14.3	-0.5	+1.9
… 626 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Ninetales (Alolan) Atk · atk≥147.16 (751 IV spreads)

Clears 54 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Bellibolt, Corviknight, +21 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Ninetales (Alolan) (3 scenario flips).

138.91 Atk for Tinkaton (Shadow Ball) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v1)
139.66 Atk for Tinkaton (Rock Tomb) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v1)
142.89 Atk for Corviknight (Shadow Ball) vs Corviknight (0v0)
142.98 Atk for Corviknight (Rock Tomb) vs Corviknight (0v0)
145.31 Atk for Corviknight (Shadow Claw) vs Corviknight (0v0)
138.47 Atk for Virizion (Shadow Ball) vs Virizion (1v0)
142.49 Atk for Mimikyu (Shadow Ball) vs Mimikyu (2v1, 2v2)
143.86 Atk for Mimikyu (Rock Tomb) vs Mimikyu (2v1, 2v2)
144.09 Atk for Mimikyu (Shadow Claw) vs Mimikyu (2v1, 2v2)
142.66 Atk for Snorlax (Rock Tomb) vs Snorlax (2v1)
143.56 Atk for Snorlax (Shadow Claw) vs Snorlax (2v1)
143.56 Atk for Snorlax (Shadow Ball) vs Snorlax (2v1)
146.21 Atk for Florges (Shadow Ball) vs Florges (2v2 with bait)
146.63 Atk for Florges (Rock Tomb) vs Florges (2v2 with bait)
137.42 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
137.64 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
137.64 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
138.31 Atk for Lapras (Rock Tomb) vs Lapras (1v0)
143.01 Atk for Lapras (Shadow Ball) vs Lapras (1v0)
147.16 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Shadow Claw) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v1)
140.37 Atk for Dondozo (Shadow Ball) vs Dondozo (2v1)
140.61 Atk for Dondozo (Rock Tomb) vs Dondozo (2v1)
143.05 Atk for Regidrago (Shadow Ball) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
143.67 Atk for Regidrago (Rock Tomb) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
144.25 Atk for Regidrago (Shadow Claw) vs Regidrago (2v2 with bait)
146.36 Atk for Ninetales (Shadow Claw) vs Ninetales (2v2)
146.36 Atk for Ninetales (Shadow Ball) vs Ninetales (2v2)
147.09 Atk for Ninetales (Rock Tomb) vs Ninetales (2v2)
138.36 Atk for Cresselia (Shadow Claw) vs Cresselia (2v2)
138.36 Atk for Cresselia (Shadow Ball) vs Cresselia (2v2)
140.27 Atk for Cresselia (Rock Tomb) vs Cresselia (2v2)
137.44 Atk for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (1v0, 2v1, 2v2)
139.30 Atk for Runerigus (Shadow Claw) vs Runerigus (2v1)
143.78 Atk for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (1v0)
147.03 Atk for Ampharos (Rock Tomb) vs Ampharos (1v1)
137.60 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
138.10 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
145.38 Atk for Bellibolt (Shadow Ball) vs Bellibolt (2v1 with bait)
145.38 Atk for Bellibolt (Rock Tomb) vs Bellibolt (2v1 with bait)
139.63 Atk for Seismitoad (Shadow Ball) vs Seismitoad (1v0)
141.52 Atk for Seismitoad (Shadow Claw) vs Seismitoad (1v0)
145.19 Atk for Miltank (Shadow Ball) vs Miltank (1v2)
145.58 Atk for Miltank (Rock Tomb) vs Miltank (1v2)
137.70 Atk for Forretress (Shadow Ball) vs Forretress (0v1, 1v2 no bait)
138.42 Atk for Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (0v1, 1v2 no bait)
137.44 Atk for Guzzlord (Shadow Ball) vs Guzzlord (2v0)
138.58 Atk for Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
141.60 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v0)
142.21 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v0)
145.23 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v0)
141.38 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
142.19 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
137.45 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
139.02 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

137.81 Atk flips Rillaboom (1v0) [3840 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Melmetal (1v2, 2v2)

Member IVs (751)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/13/11 👑	147.89	210.07	136	#2	+1	-6.0	+7.6	+3.4
14/14/12	147.85	209.66	136	#7	+0	-6.5	+6.8	+2.6
13/14/12 👑	147.45	210.29	136	#8	-1	-6.4	+6.7	+0.1
13/12/11	147.89	209.23	136	#10	+0	-7.0	+7.5	+2.1
13/11/14 👑	147.45	207.77	138	#11	-3	-5.5	+3.6	+2.5
15/15/13	147.79	209.24	136	#12	+0	-7.0	+7.5	+2.1
14/13/15 👑	147.41	208.20	138	#13	+0	-5.1	+3.3	+2.1
14/15/13	147.41	209.87	136	#15	-1	-6.7	+6.0	-0.5
13/9/15 👑	147.45	206.10	139	#17	-4	-7.2	+2.2	+0.7
14/14/14 👑	147.41	209.03	137	#19	+0	-5.7	+2.8	-0.3
14/10/15 👑	147.85	206.32	138	#25	-9	-9.8	+2.2	+3.1
15/13/15 👑	147.79	207.57	137	#29	-5	-6.5	+0.7	+2.7
14/12/15	147.41	207.37	138	#30	-7	-8.0	+1.8	+0.1
13/13/12	147.45	209.45	136	#32	-2	-7.4	+6.5	-1.5
13/10/14	147.45	206.94	138	#34	-9	-8.2	+1.6	+0.0
14/7/15 👑	148.29	204.42	139	#39	-9	-8.8	+1.6	+2.8
13/14/10 👑	147.89	210.92	135	#40	-3	-8.1	+2.1	+3.3
15/10/15 👑	148.24	205.70	138	#41	-8	-10.2	+1.3	+3.5
13/12/13 👑	147.45	208.61	137	#42	-4	-6.3	+1.8	-1.1
14/10/11 👑	148.73	207.55	136	#44	-6	-6.9	-1.3	+6.1
15/15/15	147.35	208.61	137	#47	-5	-6.3	+1.7	-1.1
14/13/14	147.41	208.20	137	#50	-4	-6.7	+1.6	-1.2
13/8/14 👑	147.89	205.87	138	#51	-11	-10.2	+1.2	+1.7
15/4/15 👑	149.13	201.91	139	#53	-10	-11.5	+0.6	+6.3
14/4/15 👑	148.73	202.51	139	#58	-14	-11.6	-0.0	+6.7
14/15/11	147.85	210.50	135	#63	-7	-8.4	+1.9	+2.1
14/10/13 👑	148.29	206.94	137	#65	-8	-8.7	-1.2	+1.9
14/11/15	147.41	206.53	138	#66	-10	-10.8	+1.4	-0.5
13/8/15	147.45	205.26	139	#68	-11	-9.3	+0.9	-1.0
13/11/13	147.45	207.77	137	#69	-7	-6.8	-0.2	-0.8
14/13/12	147.85	208.82	136	#71	-7	-7.4	+2.8	+0.7
14/13/13	147.85	208.82	136	#72	-7	-7.4	+2.8	+0.7
13/13/10	147.89	210.07	135	#73	-6	-8.7	+1.7	+1.7
15/14/15	147.35	207.78	137	#74	-8	-6.9	-0.3	-0.8
14/11/14 👑	147.85	207.15	137	#76	-11	-9.1	-1.5	+0.1
13/6/15	147.89	204.19	139	#77	-12	-11.8	+0.9	+2.6
14/13/9 👑	148.73	210.07	134	#78	+0	-9.5	+1.5	+4.8
15/13/13 👑	148.24	208.20	136	#79	-5	-7.9	+2.5	+2.0
13/9/14	147.45	206.10	138	#80	-11	-10.8	+0.9	-1.0
15/12/15	147.79	206.74	137	#81	-11	-9.2	-1.5	+0.0
13/9/13	147.89	206.71	137	#82	-11	-9.1	-1.5	-0.1
14/9/15	147.85	205.48	138	#84	-13	-10.8	+0.9	-1.3
15/13/11 👑	148.68	208.82	135	#86	-8	-8.4	-0.4	+4.8
14/14/13	147.41	209.03	136	#87	-6	-7.7	+2.3	-2.3
13/11/11	147.89	208.39	136	#89	-7	-8.0	+2.3	+0.3
13/11/12	147.89	208.39	136	#90	-7	-8.0	+2.3	+0.3
15/14/13	147.79	208.41	136	#92	-7	-8.0	+2.2	+0.3
15/14/14	147.79	208.41	136	#93	-7	-8.0	+2.2	+0.3
15/11/14	148.24	206.53	137	#94	-9	-10.5	-1.4	+1.6
15/15/8 👑	149.13	211.13	133	#95	+0	-10.0	+2.3	+2.8
… 701 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Virizion Bulk · def≥209.20 (980 IV spreads)

Clears 148 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Annihilape, Blastoise, Clefable, +30 more. Bulkpoint(s) vs Virizion (1 scenario flip).

199.58 Def + 137 HP for Corviknight (Payback) vs Corviknight (1v2, 2v2)
201.57 Def + 135 HP for Corviknight (Sky Attack) vs Corviknight (1v2, 2v2)
201.57 Def + 135 HP for Corviknight (Air Cutter) vs Corviknight (1v2, 2v2)
203.06 Def + 136 HP for Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Corviknight (1v2, 2v2)
199.82 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
200.09 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Superpower) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
200.26 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
200.31 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
200.71 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
202.24 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Outrage) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v1)
199.16 Def + 130 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Payback) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v2 with bait)
199.37 Def + 130 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v2 with bait)
201.57 Def + 130 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Sky Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v2 with bait)
201.70 Def + 135 HP for Melmetal (Flash Cannon) vs Melmetal (0v0)
201.70 Def + 135 HP for Melmetal (Double Iron Bash) vs Melmetal (0v0)
203.76 Def + 137 HP for Melmetal (Hyper Beam) vs Melmetal (0v0)
205.54 Def + 136 HP for Melmetal (Rock Slide) vs Melmetal (0v0)
208.56 Def + 135 HP for Melmetal (Thunderbolt) vs Melmetal (0v0)
208.56 Def + 135 HP for Melmetal (Dynamic Punch) vs Melmetal (0v0)
209.20 Def + 139 HP for Virizion (Leaf Blade) vs Virizion (0v0)
199.25 Def + 131 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Claw) vs Mimikyu (1v0)
199.25 Def + 131 HP for Mimikyu (Hex) vs Mimikyu (1v0)
199.25 Def + 130 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (1v0)
200.14 Def + 131 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (1v0)
202.69 Def + 130 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (1v0)
199.21 Def + 128 HP for Galarian Moltres (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (1v0)
199.42 Def + 128 HP for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (1v0)
199.78 Def + 132 HP for Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Feraligatr (1v0, 2v2)
200.18 Def + 131 HP for Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v0, 2v2)
201.15 Def + 132 HP for Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Feraligatr (1v0, 2v2)
201.32 Def + 132 HP for Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v0, 2v2)
199.82 Def + 128 HP for Cramorant (Surf) vs Cramorant (2v2)
200.42 Def + 137 HP for Rillaboom (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (2v1 with bait)
201.27 Def + 137 HP for Rillaboom (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (2v1 with bait)
202.33 Def + 137 HP for Rillaboom (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (2v1 with bait)
202.33 Def + 137 HP for Rillaboom (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (2v1 with bait)
203.24 Def + 137 HP for Rillaboom (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (2v1 with bait)
202.91 Def for Shadow Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
203.19 Def for Shadow Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
203.37 Def for Shadow Lapras (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
203.56 Def for Shadow Lapras (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
203.79 Def for Shadow Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
204.12 Def for Shadow Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
204.47 Def for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (2v1)
199.59 Def + 132 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (2v1 with bait)
199.59 Def + 132 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (2v1 with bait)
201.08 Def + 132 HP for Blastoise (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (2v1 with bait)
201.79 Def + 132 HP for Blastoise (Flash Cannon) vs Blastoise (2v1 with bait)
199.40 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
199.76 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
200.18 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
200.18 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
201.74 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
202.56 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
199.96 Def + 132 HP for Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Cresselia (0v0)
200.85 Def + 132 HP for Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Cresselia (0v0)
200.85 Def + 132 HP for Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Cresselia (0v0)
202.16 Def + 132 HP for Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Cresselia (0v0)
205.92 Def + 139 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
208.00 Def + 138 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
208.00 Def + 138 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (2v2)
199.55 Def + 130 HP for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (0v0)
199.55 Def + 130 HP for Clefable (Moonblast) vs Clefable (0v0)
199.85 Def + 130 HP for Clefable (Meteor Mash) vs Clefable (0v0)
200.02 Def + 131 HP for Clefable (Draining Kiss) vs Clefable (0v0)
201.45 Def + 131 HP for Clefable (Charm) vs Clefable (0v0)
204.02 Def + 130 HP for Clefable (Psychic) vs Clefable (0v0)
199.62 Def + 133 HP for Walrein (Waterfall) vs Walrein (2v1)
200.05 Def + 132 HP for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (2v1)
201.64 Def + 132 HP for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (2v1)
201.64 Def + 132 HP for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (2v1)
202.54 Def + 133 HP for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (2v1)
201.91 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
202.58 Def + 138 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
203.14 Def + 139 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
203.25 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
207.01 Def for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
207.55 Def for Seaking (Peck) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
207.55 Def for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
207.55 Def for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
207.55 Def for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
208.65 Def + 139 HP for Shadow Steelix (Crunch) vs Shadow Steelix (0v0)
209.09 Def + 139 HP for Shadow Steelix (Earthquake) vs Shadow Steelix (0v0)
199.27 Def + 132 HP for Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
199.55 Def + 132 HP for Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
199.55 Def + 134 HP for Ampharos (Thunder) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
199.55 Def + 134 HP for Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
201.16 Def + 133 HP for Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
201.25 Def + 132 HP for Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
201.93 Def + 132 HP for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
202.25 Def + 132 HP for Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (1v2 with bait)
199.30 Def + 137 HP for Shadow Malamar (Psybeam) vs Shadow Malamar (2v2 with bait)
200.07 Def + 137 HP for Shadow Malamar (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (2v2 with bait)
204.45 Def + 138 HP for Shadow Malamar (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Malamar (2v2 with bait)
207.32 Def + 137 HP for Shadow Malamar (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (2v2 with bait)
199.28 Def for Shadow Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
199.28 Def for Shadow Talonflame (Flame Charge) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
200.30 Def for Shadow Talonflame (Incinerate) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
200.30 Def for Shadow Talonflame (Fire Blast) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
200.30 Def for Shadow Talonflame (Fly) vs Shadow Talonflame (2v2)
200.72 Def + 130 HP for Annihilape (Shadow Ball) vs Annihilape (0v1 with bait)
201.72 Def + 129 HP for Annihilape (Night Slash) vs Annihilape (0v1 with bait)
201.92 Def + 129 HP for Annihilape (Close Combat) vs Annihilape (0v1 with bait)
202.17 Def + 129 HP for Annihilape (Rage Fist) vs Annihilape (0v1 with bait)
200.75 Def + 129 HP for Jellicent (Ice Beam) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
200.75 Def + 131 HP for Jellicent (Bubble Beam) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
200.75 Def + 129 HP for Jellicent (Surf) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
201.26 Def + 129 HP for Jellicent (Shadow Ball) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
201.90 Def + 129 HP for Jellicent (Bubble) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
206.10 Def + 129 HP for Jellicent (Hex) vs Jellicent (1v1 no bait)
200.53 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
202.01 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
202.44 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Forretress (Earthquake) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
203.78 Def + 131 HP for Shadow Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
206.04 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Forretress (Volt Switch) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
206.40 Def + 132 HP for Shadow Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Shadow Forretress (1v2 no bait)
205.23 Def + 139 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
205.23 Def + 139 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
205.23 Def + 139 HP for Shadow Cradily (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
205.59 Def + 138 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
208.49 Def + 138 HP for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (2v2 no bait)
206.84 Def + 132 HP for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
206.89 Def + 132 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
207.29 Def + 133 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
207.39 Def + 133 HP for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
204.71 Def + 130 HP for Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2 with bait)
204.91 Def + 130 HP for Giratina Altered (Ancient Power) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2 with bait)
205.54 Def + 128 HP for Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2 with bait)
206.39 Def for Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2 with bait)
199.18 Def for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (2v0)
206.58 Def + 137 HP for Skeledirge (Blast Burn) vs Skeledirge (1v1 with bait)
206.80 Def + 137 HP for Skeledirge (Shadow Ball) vs Skeledirge (1v1 with bait)
207.15 Def + 137 HP for Skeledirge (Crunch) vs Skeledirge (1v1 with bait)
207.29 Def + 137 HP for Skeledirge (Flamethrower) vs Skeledirge (1v1 with bait)
208.41 Def + 137 HP for Skeledirge (Torch Song) vs Skeledirge (1v1 with bait)
206.57 Def + 139 HP for Registeel (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (0v0)
206.21 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Energy Ball) vs Ninetales (0v0)
206.37 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Fire Blast) vs Ninetales (0v0)
206.89 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Scorching Sands) vs Ninetales (0v0)
206.89 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Solar Beam) vs Ninetales (0v0)
207.17 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Overheat) vs Ninetales (0v0)
208.11 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Flamethrower) vs Ninetales (0v0)
208.11 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Weather Ball (Fire)) vs Ninetales (0v0)
208.46 Def + 139 HP for Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Ninetales (0v0)
205.50 Def + 137 HP for Forretress (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v1 no bait)
207.22 Def + 137 HP for Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Forretress (0v1 no bait)
208.21 Def + 137 HP for Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Forretress (0v1 no bait)
208.21 Def + 137 HP for Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Forretress (0v1 no bait)

Member IVs (980)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
11/15/15 👑	145.78	211.13	139	#1	+9	+0.5	+0.4	+1.9
13/13/11 👑	147.89	210.07	136	#2	+1	-6.0	+7.6	+3.4
10/15/15 👑	145.37	211.76	139	#3	+7	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
10/14/15	145.37	210.92	139	#4	+4	-0.5	-0.1	-0.3
11/14/15	145.78	210.29	139	#5	+7	-1.9	-0.7	+0.5
12/14/14 👑	146.61	210.29	138	#6	+0	-6.2	+0.4	+0.4
14/14/12	147.85	209.66	136	#7	+0	-6.5	+6.8	+2.6
13/14/12 👑	147.45	210.29	136	#8	-1	-6.4	+6.7	+0.1
12/15/13 👑	146.61	211.13	137	#9	-1	-7.9	+3.3	-0.5
13/12/11	147.89	209.23	136	#10	+0	-7.0	+7.5	+2.1
15/15/13	147.79	209.24	136	#12	+0	-7.0	+7.5	+2.1
14/15/13	147.41	209.87	136	#15	-1	-6.7	+6.0	-0.5
11/12/15 👑	146.21	209.23	139	#18	+3	-4.5	+1.1	-1.2
12/13/14	146.61	209.45	138	#20	-4	-6.8	+1.2	-1.8
12/14/13	146.61	210.29	137	#21	-4	-7.4	+3.0	-1.7
11/15/14	145.78	211.13	138	#22	-2	-8.0	-0.9	-1.5
12/15/11 👑	147.05	211.76	136	#23	-6	-7.8	+2.2	-0.1
9/15/15	144.53	211.76	139	#24	+0	-4.0	-0.6	-0.2
10/13/15	145.37	210.07	139	#26	+1	-2.9	-1.3	-1.8
11/13/15	145.78	209.45	139	#27	+1	-4.8	-0.3	-1.7
11/14/14 👑	146.21	210.92	138	#28	-1	-7.9	-0.5	-1.3
13/13/12	147.45	209.45	136	#32	-2	-7.4	+6.5	-1.5
13/15/15	146.57	209.87	138	#33	-3	-6.5	+1.0	-2.4
13/14/14 👑	147.01	209.66	137	#35	-5	-7.3	+2.5	-2.0
12/14/11	147.05	210.92	136	#36	-8	-8.3	+2.1	-0.4
12/14/12	147.05	210.92	136	#37	-8	-8.3	+2.1	-0.4
9/14/15	144.53	210.92	139	#38	+0	-4.6	-0.7	-0.5
13/14/10 👑	147.89	210.92	135	#40	-3	-8.1	+2.1	+3.3
12/12/13 👑	147.05	209.23	137	#43	-6	-7.6	+1.9	-1.4
12/15/12	146.61	211.13	136	#45	-11	-8.8	+1.7	-3.9
14/15/15	146.96	209.24	137	#46	-7	-7.6	+1.9	-1.4
11/13/14	146.21	210.07	138	#48	-4	-7.3	-1.0	-2.7
10/15/14	145.37	211.76	138	#49	-6	-8.5	-1.3	-3.0
12/15/15	146.18	210.50	138	#52	-3	-8.2	-0.8	-2.6
13/15/12	147.01	210.50	136	#54	-10	-8.7	+1.9	-1.5
13/15/13	147.01	210.50	136	#55	-10	-8.7	+1.9	-1.5
11/15/13 👑	146.21	211.76	137	#57	-4	-8.5	+2.4	-3.3
12/13/11	147.05	210.07	136	#61	-9	-8.8	+1.4	-1.8
12/13/12	147.05	210.07	136	#62	-9	-8.8	+1.4	-1.8
14/15/11	147.85	210.50	135	#63	-7	-8.4	+1.9	+2.1
12/13/13	146.61	209.45	137	#67	-9	-8.2	+1.7	-4.9
10/12/15	145.37	209.23	139	#70	-3	-5.7	-0.7	-3.7
13/13/10	147.89	210.07	135	#73	-6	-8.7	+1.7	+1.7
10/14/14	145.37	210.92	138	#75	-10	-9.1	-1.4	-3.5
14/13/9 👑	148.73	210.07	134	#78	+0	-9.5	+1.5	+4.8
11/14/13	146.21	210.92	137	#83	-4	-9.1	+2.1	-3.4
8/15/15	143.69	211.76	139	#88	+0	-6.3	-3.0	-5.8
12/14/15	146.18	209.66	138	#91	-7	-7.4	-0.5	-4.3
15/15/8 👑	149.13	211.13	133	#95	+0	-10.0	+2.3	+2.8
13/15/11 👑	147.45	211.13	135	#96	-5	-9.1	+1.2	-0.3
… 930 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

General · atk≥137.42, def≥199.16 (3600 IV spreads)

Clears 2 anchors across 2 shield scenarios, covering Shadow Corviknight, Shadow Feraligatr. Floor across 27 atk breakpoint opponents + 34 bulkpoint opponents. Clears the easiest anchor for every opponent.

137.42 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
199.16 Def + 130 HP for Shadow Corviknight bulk (Payback) vs Shadow Corviknight (2v2 with bait)

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Guzzlord (2v0)

Member IVs (3600)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
11/15/15 👑	145.78	211.13	139	#1	+9	+0.5	+0.4	+1.9
13/13/11 👑	147.89	210.07	136	#2	+1	-6.0	+7.6	+3.4
10/15/15 👑	145.37	211.76	139	#3	+7	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
10/14/15	145.37	210.92	139	#4	+4	-0.5	-0.1	-0.3
11/14/15	145.78	210.29	139	#5	+7	-1.9	-0.7	+0.5
12/14/14 👑	146.61	210.29	138	#6	+0	-6.2	+0.4	+0.4
14/14/12	147.85	209.66	136	#7	+0	-6.5	+6.8	+2.6
13/14/12 👑	147.45	210.29	136	#8	-1	-6.4	+6.7	+0.1
12/15/13 👑	146.61	211.13	137	#9	-1	-7.9	+3.3	-0.5
13/12/11	147.89	209.23	136	#10	+0	-7.0	+7.5	+2.1
13/11/14 👑	147.45	207.77	138	#11	-3	-5.5	+3.6	+2.5
15/15/13	147.79	209.24	136	#12	+0	-7.0	+7.5	+2.1
14/13/15 👑	147.41	208.20	138	#13	+0	-5.1	+3.3	+2.1
12/11/15	146.61	207.77	139	#14	-1	-7.6	+1.0	+0.5
14/15/13	147.41	209.87	136	#15	-1	-6.7	+6.0	-0.5
12/12/15 👑	146.61	208.61	139	#16	+0	-7.2	+0.9	+0.3
13/9/15 👑	147.45	206.10	139	#17	-4	-7.2	+2.2	+0.7
11/12/15 👑	146.21	209.23	139	#18	+3	-4.5	+1.1	-1.2
14/14/14 👑	147.41	209.03	137	#19	+0	-5.7	+2.8	-0.3
12/13/14	146.61	209.45	138	#20	-4	-6.8	+1.2	-1.8
12/14/13	146.61	210.29	137	#21	-4	-7.4	+3.0	-1.7
11/15/14	145.78	211.13	138	#22	-2	-8.0	-0.9	-1.5
12/15/11 👑	147.05	211.76	136	#23	-6	-7.8	+2.2	-0.1
9/15/15	144.53	211.76	139	#24	+0	-4.0	-0.6	-0.2
14/10/15 👑	147.85	206.32	138	#25	-9	-9.8	+2.2	+3.1
10/13/15	145.37	210.07	139	#26	+1	-2.9	-1.3	-1.8
11/13/15	145.78	209.45	139	#27	+1	-4.8	-0.3	-1.7
11/14/14 👑	146.21	210.92	138	#28	-1	-7.9	-0.5	-1.3
15/13/15 👑	147.79	207.57	137	#29	-5	-6.5	+0.7	+2.7
14/12/15	147.41	207.37	138	#30	-7	-8.0	+1.8	+0.1
12/9/15 👑	147.05	206.71	139	#31	-7	-8.7	+1.2	-0.2
13/13/12	147.45	209.45	136	#32	-2	-7.4	+6.5	-1.5
13/15/15	146.57	209.87	138	#33	-3	-6.5	+1.0	-2.4
13/10/14	147.45	206.94	138	#34	-9	-8.2	+1.6	+0.0
13/14/14 👑	147.01	209.66	137	#35	-5	-7.3	+2.5	-2.0
12/14/11	147.05	210.92	136	#36	-8	-8.3	+2.1	-0.4
12/14/12	147.05	210.92	136	#37	-8	-8.3	+2.1	-0.4
9/14/15	144.53	210.92	139	#38	+0	-4.6	-0.7	-0.5
14/7/15 👑	148.29	204.42	139	#39	-9	-8.8	+1.6	+2.8
13/14/10 👑	147.89	210.92	135	#40	-3	-8.1	+2.1	+3.3
15/10/15 👑	148.24	205.70	138	#41	-8	-10.2	+1.3	+3.5
13/12/13 👑	147.45	208.61	137	#42	-4	-6.3	+1.8	-1.1
12/12/13 👑	147.05	209.23	137	#43	-6	-7.6	+1.9	-1.4
14/10/11 👑	148.73	207.55	136	#44	-6	-6.9	-1.3	+6.1
12/15/12	146.61	211.13	136	#45	-11	-8.8	+1.7	-3.9
14/15/15	146.96	209.24	137	#46	-7	-7.6	+1.9	-1.4
15/15/15	147.35	208.61	137	#47	-5	-6.3	+1.7	-1.1
11/13/14	146.21	210.07	138	#48	-4	-7.3	-1.0	-2.7
10/15/14	145.37	211.76	138	#49	-6	-8.5	-1.3	-3.0
14/13/14	147.41	208.20	137	#50	-4	-6.7	+1.6	-1.2
… 3550 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Per-matchup IV finder (171 specific matchups - e.g. "which IV beats a given opponent in a given shield?")

Collapsed by default. This is a per-(opponent, shield) lookup: each card is one matchup and the exact IV spreads that win it. For "what do I need vs threat X" use Threats where your build choice matters above, or paste your collection into the scatter. Composite cards (slayer ∩ tier) surface IVs that satisfy a slayer anchor and a stat-cutoff tier; pure slayer-archetype cards live in the Slayer Builds block below, pure tier cards in the Threshold Tiers above.

Show only notable categories (≤ 5% of cohort or ≤ 5 members). Uncheck to see every non-trivial intersection.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Virizion Bulk (2 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Virizion Bulk · def≥209.203

15/12/8 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 209.23, hp 133, SP #266

One of 2 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Virizion Bulk threshold (def≥209.203). Trades mirror dominance (133/150 wins, vs 150/150 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Virizion Bulk cutoff.

15/13/7 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 210.07, hp 132, SP #337

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Melmetal Slayer (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Melmetal Slayer · atk≥147.745, hp≥127

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +1.0, spread 1.2)

15/1/15 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 199.99, hp 139, SP #285

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Slayer threshold (atk≥147.745, hp≥127). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (150/150) AND clears the Melmetal Slayer cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/15 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 199.15, hp 139, SP #372

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Slayer threshold (atk≥147.745, hp≥127). Trades mirror dominance (146/150 wins, vs 150/150 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Melmetal Slayer cutoff.

15/0/14 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 199.15, hp 138, SP #509

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Slayer threshold (atk≥147.745, hp≥127). Trades mirror dominance (133/150 wins, vs 150/150 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Melmetal Slayer cutoff.

15/1/14 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 199.99, hp 138, SP #431

15/2/13 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 200.83, hp 137, SP #490

15/2/14 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 200.83, hp 138, SP #353

15/3/13 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 201.67, hp 137, SP #410

15/4/13 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 202.51, hp 137, SP #330

15/5/11 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 203.35, hp 136, SP #394

15/5/12 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 203.35, hp 136, SP #393

15/6/11 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 204.19, hp 136, SP #310

15/7/10 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 205.03, hp 135, SP #373

15/7/11 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 205.03, hp 136, SP #225

15/8/10 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 205.87, hp 135, SP #291

15/9/9 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 206.71, hp 134, SP #362

15/10/8 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 207.55, hp 133, SP #428

15/10/9 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 207.55, hp 134, SP #280

15/11/8 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 208.39, hp 133, SP #351

15/12/8 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 209.23, hp 133, SP #266

15/13/7 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 210.07, hp 132, SP #337

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Muk (Alolan) Slayer (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Muk (Alolan) Slayer · atk≥148.293, hp≥127

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +1.0, spread 1.2)

15/1/15 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 199.99, hp 139, SP #285

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Muk (Alolan) Slayer threshold (atk≥148.293, hp≥127). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (150/150) AND clears the Muk (Alolan) Slayer cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/15 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 199.15, hp 139, SP #372

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Muk (Alolan) Slayer threshold (atk≥148.293, hp≥127). Trades mirror dominance (146/150 wins, vs 150/150 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Muk (Alolan) Slayer cutoff.

15/0/14 heavy atk weight - atk 149.57, def 199.15, hp 138, SP #509

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Muk (Alolan) Slayer threshold (atk≥148.293, hp≥127). Trades mirror dominance (133/150 wins, vs 150/150 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Muk (Alolan) Slayer cutoff.