Shadow Alolan Ninetales Ultra League IV Dive

Opponent list (63 mons)

Tinkaton, Corviknight, Snorlax (Shadow), Corviknight (Shadow), Melmetal, Virizion, Zygarde (Complete Forme), Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow), Mimikyu, Snorlax, Florges, Moltres (Galarian), Feraligatr (Shadow), Feraligatr, Jellicent, Giratina (Altered), Cramorant, Guzzlord, Skeledirge, Rillaboom, Lapras, Lapras (Shadow), Dusknoir, Ninetales (Alolan), Dondozo, Dusknoir (Shadow), Registeel, Blastoise, Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), Forretress, Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), Regidrago, Ninetales, Cresselia, Muk (Alolan), Clefable, Talonflame, Forretress (Shadow), Walrein, Walrein (Shadow), Deoxys (Defense), Runerigus, Steelix, Seaking, Cresselia (Shadow), Steelix (Shadow), Swampert, Toucannon, Milotic (Shadow), Primarina, Ampharos, Cradily (Shadow), Malamar (Shadow), Ampharos (Shadow), Talonflame (Shadow), Bellibolt, Seismitoad, Annihilape, Miltank, Forretress (Bug Bite), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)

Which one to build? [all shields, equal] Build 1 (124 spreads: no two- or three-stat rule fits; 124 spreads by list) guarantees 58 of 87 decision matchups, 29 of them under every opponent-IV mode; Build 3 (54: Def >= 144.90 and HP >= 159 (bulk box)) guarantees 55 and holds stat-product rank-1 (SP1).

Build criteria: the same control as the one in the scatter strip below; either handle moves both

Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) running Powder Snow / Chilling Water, Dazzling Gleam.

[all shields, equal] Build 1 (124 spreads: no two- or three-stat rule fits; 124 spreads by list) guarantees 58 of 87 decision matchups, 29 of them under every opponent-IV mode; Build 3 (54: Def >= 144.90 and HP >= 159 (bulk box)) guarantees 55 and holds stat-product rank-1 (SP1).

Single-stat line: Defense >= 141.84 decides 2v1 Walrein. SP1 clears it.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 124 spreads by list	124	58 of 87, 5 of them material; 29 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (outside 13%)	13: 0v0 Steelix, 0v2 Regidrago, +11 more	10/13/13 (270 of 567 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (58 of 87), its 124 members all inside attack IV 10-14, defense IV 4-15, HP IV 10-15; that box also holds 236 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (9) 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 18%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 25%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 27%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 38% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 25%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 87% 1v0 (10) 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 35% 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 48% 1v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 59% 1v1 (10) 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 23%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 56%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (3) 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 13%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 14%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 40%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (1) 2v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 90% 2v1 (9) 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 21% 2v1 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 31%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 76% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 76% 2v2 (13) 2v2 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 49%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 56%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (124), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 180.70 and Def >= 137.60 and HP >= 157	320	50 of 87, 3 of them material; 24 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	21: 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow), 0v0 Blastoise, +19 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 124 spreads in 320 of its own, and keeps 50 of Build 1's 58 guaranteed matchups (3 of them material). The 8 it gives up out here: 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (grid 15%), 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (grid 21%) and 2v1 Jellicent (grid 24%), and 5 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 144.90 and HP >= 159 (bulk box)	54	55 of 87, 4 of them material; 33 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (outside 2%)	16: 0v0 Rillaboom, 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan), +14 more	7/15/15 (275 of 567 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (55 of 87), its 54 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 14% 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 26% 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 55% 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 71% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 26%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 87% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 13% 1v0 (13) 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 2%; material 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 8%; material 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 36% 1v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 38% 1v1 (9) 1v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 7%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 24%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 37% 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (1) 1v2 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 23%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (3) 2v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 6%; material 2v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 15%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 90% 2v1 (7) 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 23% 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 35% 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 76% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 77% 2v2 (14) 2v2 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 20% 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 21%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (54), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 3 (bulk)'s most-winning spread 7/15/15@50 wins 5 more matchups overall (275 against 270, of 567), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 3 more of the 87 decision matchups (58 against 55).

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 124 spreads by list	124	32 of 43 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 58 of 87 overall, 5 of them material; 29 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (outside 13%)	12: 0v0 Steelix, 0v2 Regidrago, +10 more	13/15/14 (89 of 189 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (32 of 43 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 58 of 87 overall), its 124 members all inside attack IV 10-14, defense IV 4-15, HP IV 10-15; that box also holds 236 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (9) 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 18%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 25%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 27%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 38% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 25%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 87% 1v0 (10) 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 35% 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 48% 1v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 59% 1v1 (10) 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 23%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 56%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (3) 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 13%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 14%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 40%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (1) 2v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 90% 2v1 (9) 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 21% 2v1 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 31%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 76% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 76% 2v2 (13) 2v2 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 41%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 49%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 56%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (124), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 180.70 and Def >= 137.60 and HP >= 157	320	28 of 43 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 50 of 87 overall, 3 of them material; 24 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	20: 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow), 0v0 Blastoise, +18 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 124 spreads in 320 of its own, and keeps 28 of Build 1's 32 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (50 of its 58 overall, 3 of them material). The 8 it gives up out here: 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (grid 15%), 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (grid 21%) and 2v1 Jellicent (grid 24%), and 5 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 142.15 and HP >= 161 (bulk box)	53	28 of 43 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 53 of 87 overall, 3 of them material; 32 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (outside 2%)	17: 0v0 Rillaboom, 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan), +15 more	7/15/15 (92 of 189 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (28 of 43 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 53 of 87 overall), its 53 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 14% 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 26% 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 55% 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 71% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 26%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 87% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 13% 1v0 (12) 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 2%; material 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 8%; material 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 36% 1v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 38% 1v1 (9) 1v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 7%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 24%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 37% 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (1) 1v2 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 23%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (2) 2v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 15%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 90% 2v1 (7) 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 23% 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 35% 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 76% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 77% 2v2 (14) 2v2 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 20% 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 21%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (53), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 3 (bulk)'s most-winning spread 7/15/15@50 wins 3 more matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (92 against 89, of 189), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 4 more of the 43 decision matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (32 against 28; 58 against 53 over all 87).

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 291 spreads by list	291	10 of 14 in 1v1 shields; 48 of 87 overall, 0 of them material; 25 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v1 Jellicent (outside 18%)	nothing the other builds guarantee	7/14/15 (33 of 63 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 1 guarantees (10 of 14 in 1v1 shields; 48 of 87 overall), its 291 members all inside attack IV 6-14, defense IV 4-15, HP IV 10-15; that box also holds 357 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (6) 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 22%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 35% 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 52% 0v0 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 (2) 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 22%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 87% 1v0 (9) 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 45% 1v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 57% 1v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 59% 1v1 (10) 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 19%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 54%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (1) 2v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 89% 2v1 (8) 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 18% 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 75% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 75% 2v1 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 80% 2v2 (12) 2v2 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 38%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 62%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (291), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 177.00 and Def >= 137.60 and HP >= 157	599	8 of 14 in 1v1 shields; 40 of 87 overall, 0 of them material; 21 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	8: 0v0 Blastoise, 0v1 Virizion, +6 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 96% of the same spreads (22 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 291 spreads in 599 of its own, and keeps 8 of Build 1's 10 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (40 of its 48 overall, none of them material). The 8 it gives up out here: 2v1 Jellicent (grid 24%), 1v1 Florges (grid 25%) and 0v1 Virizion (grid 27%), and 5 more.

Rates: outside N% is the share of the spreads NOT in that build that win the same matchup anyway; grid N% (the Notable spreads list and the cards at the top of the page) is the share of all the spreads on the grid. Weight follows the rate: bold = fewer than half of them win it; bold and underlined = fewer than a quarter; bold, underlined and italic = fewer than a tenth; dim = more than nine in ten win it anyway.

Each build's guarantee list is sorted by outside rate: how often the spreads NOT in that build win the same matchup anyway. The lower the rate, the rarer the guarantee.

Against the 30 spreads the mirror-slayer protocol converges on for Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (neither attack-first nor bulk-first here), attack of 183.77 and up wins charge-move priority against 17 of them, and 184.32 and up against 24. Inside a build, take the highest attack you have: Build 1 clears the first cut with 2 of 124 and the second with 0; Build 3 clears neither with any of its 54.

Is mine in one of these?

Paste your Poke Genie CSV, or add one spread by hand, in Check my collection below; the answer comes back here, grouped by build, and your collection stays in your browser.

Shield scenario:

Y: Color:

Stat-product rank against matchups won with PvPoke-default opponent IVs at the league cap over the whole opponent pool and, with Shield scenario on all, every baked shield state -- the view the single-stat line in the expander below was derived on. The Shield scenario selector on this row is the section's own; the scatter's dropdowns and the opponent filter do not drive this panel.

SP1 7/15/15, 7/15/15, 0/15/15

Notable spreads

Every single spread this page names, on one list: the spread that wins the most matchups, the one with the highest avg battle score, SP1, and each build's most-winning member. Entries whose decision-matchup wins overlap by 90% or more are merged, because two spreads that win the same matchups are one offer.

7/15/15 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios) and highest avg battle score / Stat-product rank-1 (SP1) / Build 3's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 3, which guarantees 55 of the 70 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v2 Cresselia (grid 2%), 2v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (grid 3%) and 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (grid 3%)

10/13/13 -- Build 1's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 1, which guarantees 58 of the 73 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v2 Cresselia (grid 2%), 2v0 Corviknight (grid 7%) and 1v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (grid 8%)

What to do with this: If you already have one of these spreads, build it: each is the top of this grid on the measure that named it. If you are hunting, hunt a build instead -- see the single-stat line for what changes the score.

Rocket-grunt encounters (this is a shadow, so it cannot be traded) needed to meet one named spread out of the 4096 on this grid: 2839 for a 50% chance, 5678 for a 75% chance. Model: the grunt IV floor is not verified here, and the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid.

The single-stat line

5 of the 7 movesets on this page carry a line. This page is Chilling Water, Dazzling Gleam, at least 141.84 defense; Dazzling Gleam, Weather Ball (Ice) prints the same line; Chilling Water, Ice Beam is at least 181.88 attack; Blizzard, Chilling Water is at least 181.88 attack; Weather Ball (Ice), Chilling Water is at least 181.88 attack; Blizzard, Weather Ball (Ice) and Ice Beam, Weather Ball (Ice) carry no line.

Line: Def >= 141.84 [exact] -- 1459 of 4096 spreads (35.6%)
Decides: 2v1 Walrein, rank 40
SP1: 7/15/15 -- clears it
Alternative: none
Not claimed: 107 of 120 contested matchups

Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) running Powder Snow / Chilling Water, Dazzling Gleam in Ultra League has a line at defense, which 7/15/15 at L50, 0/15/15 at L50 and 1457 other spreads reach. 1459 of the 4096 IV spreads (35.6%) reach it. It decides the 2v1 against Walrein (rank 40) outright: every spread at or above it wins that fight, and every spread below it loses. That is where a PvPoke-default Walrein (4/13/14) stops doing 4 with POWDER_SNOW and starts doing 3. Its ICICLE_SPEAR (36 -> 35) and EARTHQUAKE (81 -> 80) step across the same line. It points the same way in all 4 baked opponent-IV settings and in 2 of the 7 movesets baked here. It is built for the default Walrein; a hundo Walrein moves it to 145.21, and the ladder further down has the rest.

SP1, 7/15/15, already clears it, so there is nothing to trade away here. It costs nothing to clear: the spread that clears the line and wins the most matchups, 7/15/15, takes 275 of 567, the same count as SP1. The next step up is 142.36 defense, which adds the 2v2 against Malamar (Shadow). A separate line on another stat: 181.88 attack for the 2v0 against Tinkaton (rank 1), where the spread clearing it that wins the most matchups takes 6 fewer than the spread that misses it and wins the most. The printed line is the one with the larger net. No HP-and-attack pair of 100 spreads or more wins a matchup the printed line cannot, so there is no second target to name. 107 of the 120 contested matchups turn on no single stat at all, and this page does not claim them.

Shield scenario:

Why these regions

Why these regions and not others. The set panel below is every candidate region the builds were cut from. Under it, the same grid grouped by which contested matchups a spread wins -- its win/loss fingerprint, not its score -- drawn on the stat planes where a region is a shape; crossing a breakpoint or bulkpoint moves a spread to the next cluster.

The set panel (an UpSet plot: a bar chart of set intersections, Lex et al. 2014). Left: the named sets the lattice was built from (rows, labelled 'spreads in the set / decision matchups every member of it wins') and the candidate regions made by intersecting them (columns -- bar height is spreads, the number above it is decision matchups guaranteed in the shield scenarios this setting counts, and a coloured column is one of the builds in the table above). A dot means the region sits inside that row's set. The letters index THIS setting's own eight sets and are re-assigned when the Build criteria change, so compare the row names across Build criteria settings, not the letters.

clusters

Shield scenario:

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3000	177.2	140.1	154	#1-#4096	4.0	-
C1	1096	183.2	140.8	156	#15-#2140	10.0	Cresselia (+95pp), Shadow Dusknoir (+70pp), Shadow Corviknight (+67pp), Shadow Walrein (+58pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	41%	94%
Shadow Walrein	24%	82%
Rillaboom	49%	100%
Cresselia	4%	98%
Toucannon	61%	100%
Blastoise	20%	46%
Ampharos	11%	59%
Walrein	70%	100%
Shadow Dusknoir	2%	72%
Shadow Corviknight	2%	70%
Steelix	14%	16%
Snorlax	1%	46%
Deoxys (Defense)	4%	21%
Alolan Ninetales	95%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	55%	wins iff hp >= 154	82%	named
Shadow Walrein	40%	wins iff sp >= 3,931,886	83%	named
Rillaboom	62%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	100%	named
Cresselia	29%	wins iff atk >= 180.34	86%	named
Toucannon	72%	wins iff sp >= 3,594,403	74%	named
Blastoise	27%	wins iff sp >= 4,038,420	85%	named
Ampharos	24%	wins iff sp >= 4,019,153	89%	named
Walrein	78%	wins iff atk >= 175.45	97%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	21%	wins iff sp >= 4,024,411	87%	named
Shadow Corviknight	20%	wins iff atk >= 181.67	90%	named
Steelix	15%	wins iff hp >= 159	90%	named
Snorlax	13%	wins iff atk >= 183.22	91%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	9%	wins iff atk >= 184.88	100%	named
Alolan Ninetales	96%	wins iff atk >= 172.43	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3727	178.7	140.0	154	#108-#4096	1.7	-
C1	369	179.5	142.6	159	#1-#1708	5.3	Bellibolt (+86pp), Steelix (+85pp), Florges (+84pp), Virizion (+80pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Galarian Moltres	49%	61%
Virizion	20%	100%
Bellibolt	6%	91%
Shadow Steelix	86%	100%
Florges	4%	88%
Steelix	1%	87%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Galarian Moltres	50%	wins iff atk >= 179.42	100%	named
Virizion	27%	wins iff hp >= 157	83%	named
Bellibolt	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,046,119	94%	named
Shadow Steelix	88%	wins iff hp >= 150	94%	named
Florges	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,081,606	92%	named
Steelix	9%	wins iff sp >= 4,079,056	94%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2359	177.4	139.2	153	#815-#4096	6.6	-
C1	1737	180.8	141.7	156	#1-#2915	11.3	Dondozo (+76pp), Shadow Feraligatr (+74pp), Cresselia (+58pp), Dusknoir (+57pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Lapras	28%	79%
Dondozo	19%	95%
Cresselia	36%	94%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	24%	60%
Dusknoir	38%	95%
Shadow Feraligatr	5%	79%
Alolan Muk	69%	96%
Shadow Walrein	77%	100%
Steelix	81%	100%
Shadow Forretress	0%	23%
Shadow Dusknoir	89%	100%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	0%	8%
Shadow Talonflame	95%	100%
Shadow Corviknight	96%	100%
Primarina	0%	5%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Lapras	49%	wins iff hp >= 155	90%	named
Dondozo	51%	wins iff sp >= 3,869,122	84%	named
Cresselia	60%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	86%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite)	39%	wins iff def >= 141.30	97%	named
Dusknoir	62%	wins iff hp >= 154	83%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	37%	wins iff sp >= 3,935,620	88%	named
Alolan Muk	81%	wins iff hp >= 151	96%	named
Shadow Walrein	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,678,021	90%	named
Steelix	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,606,296	91%	named
Shadow Forretress	10%	wins iff sp >= 4,096,761	93%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	94%	wins iff sp >= 3,599,691	96%	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,135,761	97%	named
Shadow Talonflame	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,466,843	97%	named
Shadow Corviknight	98%	wins iff sp >= 3,543,603	99%	named
Primarina	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,155,273	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	635	173.4	138.7	152	#2458-#4096	3.4	-
C1	1448	181.5	138.8	152	#710-#4051	8.9	Shadow Feraligatr (+100pp), Shadow Cradily (+100pp), Cresselia (+91pp), Alolan Ninetales (+75pp)
C2	766	173.9	142.1	157	#24-#3565	11.1	Shadow Dusknoir (+89pp), Shadow Talonflame (+88pp), Shadow Ampharos (+82pp), Shadow Alolan Ninetales (+76pp); trades away Alolan Ninetales (-92pp), Cresselia (-91pp), Shadow Feraligatr (-84pp), Shadow Cradily (-84pp)
C3	1247	181.5	141.7	156	#1-#2584	15.0	Cresselia (+100pp), Alolan Ninetales (+100pp), Shadow Feraligatr (+84pp), Shadow Cradily (+84pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2	C3
Shadow Talonflame	9%	9%	98%	99%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	20%	20%	96%	95%
Shadow Dusknoir	0%	0%	89%	85%
Swampert	0%	53%	66%	88%
Shadow Ampharos	0%	1%	83%	75%
Cresselia	0%	91%	0%	100%
Toucannon	0%	2%	78%	73%
Alolan Ninetales	17%	92%	0%	100%
Shadow Feraligatr	0%	100%	16%	100%
Shadow Cradily	0%	100%	16%	100%
Florges	0%	0%	56%	47%
Steelix	10%	79%	88%	100%
Shadow Malamar	65%	76%	100%	100%
Dusknoir	58%	82%	100%	100%
Shadow Corviknight	74%	75%	100%	100%
Primarina	0%	1%	0%	27%
Shadow Cresselia	0%	0%	22%	13%
Ampharos	82%	100%	100%	100%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	6%	6%	0%	0%
Seaking	0%	7%	0%	0%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Talonflame	53%	wins iff sp >= 3,854,865	77%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	57%	wins iff def >= 141.58	79%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	43%	wins iff hp >= 156	76%	named
Swampert	58%	wins iff sp >= 3,843,843	84%	named
Shadow Ampharos	39%	wins iff hp >= 158	79%	named
Cresselia	62%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	100%	named
Toucannon	37%	wins iff hp >= 155	77%	named
Alolan Ninetales	66%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	97%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	69%	wins iff atk >= 176.46	100%	named
Shadow Cradily	69%	wins iff atk >= 176.46	100%	named
Florges	25%	wins iff hp >= 159	85%	named
Steelix	76%	wins iff sp >= 3,736,287	89%	named
Shadow Malamar	86%	wins iff sp >= 3,646,472	91%	named
Dusknoir	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,667,359	93%	named
Shadow Corviknight	87%	wins iff hp >= 149	90%	named
Primarina	9%	wins iff sp >= 4,079,056	94%	named
Shadow Cresselia	8%	wins iff sp >= 4,100,816	94%	named
Ampharos	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,563,916	98%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite)	3%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Seaking	3%	wins iff atk >= 186.55	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3495	178.2	140.1	154	#1-#4096	1.5	-
C1	601	182.2	141.0	158	#6-#2057	4.5	Florges (+96pp), Shadow Cresselia (+91pp), Seaking (+66pp), Shadow Corviknight (+55pp); trades away Bellibolt (-25pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Seaking	32%	98%
Bellibolt	67%	42%
Virizion	22%	39%
Florges	3%	99%
Shadow Cresselia	2%	93%
Shadow Corviknight	4%	58%
Deoxys (Defense)	9%	4%
Seismitoad	8%	11%
Cresselia	2%	6%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Seaking	42%	wins iff sp >= 3,918,095	88%	named
Bellibolt	63%	wins iff atk < 181.78	93%	named
Virizion	24%	wins iff hp >= 159	84%	named
Florges	17%	wins iff sp >= 4,026,952	90%	named
Shadow Cresselia	15%	wins iff sp >= 4,044,644	91%	named
Shadow Corviknight	12%	wins iff def < 135.15	88%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	9%	wins iff atk >= 184.88	100%	named
Seismitoad	8%	wins iff def >= 144.35	92%	named
Cresselia	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,113,397	99%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	853	176.8	138.3	151	#1553-#4096	3.9	-
C1	3243	179.3	140.8	155	#1-#3851	9.2	Talonflame (+95pp), Skeledirge (+72pp), Shadow Talonflame (+67pp), Seaking (+46pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Talonflame	0%	67%
Ninetales	16%	41%
Walrein	14%	41%
Shadow Forretress	6%	41%
Alolan Muk	2%	31%
Jellicent	0%	30%
Talonflame	2%	96%
Skeledirge	20%	92%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	71%	84%
Lapras	57%	89%
Shadow Feraligatr	61%	98%
Seaking	54%	100%
Clefable	0%	11%
Blastoise	0%	3%
Snorlax	92%	99%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Talonflame	53%	wins iff sp >= 3,854,865	77%	named
Ninetales	36%	wins iff atk >= 181.50	100%	named
Walrein	36%	wins iff def >= 141.84	100%	named
Shadow Forretress	33%	wins iff sp >= 3,951,885	84%	named
Alolan Muk	25%	wins iff atk >= 185.44	83%	named
Jellicent	24%	wins iff hp >= 158	90%	named
Talonflame	77%	wins iff sp >= 3,725,661	88%	named
Skeledirge	77%	wins iff sp >= 3,700,331	85%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite)	81%	wins iff atk >= 174.45	100%	named
Lapras	83%	wins iff atk >= 173.44	95%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,643,758	94%	named
Seaking	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,618,051	93%	named
Clefable	9%	wins iff atk >= 184.88	100%	named
Blastoise	3%	wins iff atk >= 186.55	100%	named
Snorlax	98%	wins iff sp >= 3,464,295	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1431	176.3	139.5	151	#1139-#4096	7.4	-
C1	2665	180.1	140.7	156	#1-#3698	14.3	Snorlax (+87pp), Shadow Steelix (+77pp), Rillaboom (+66pp), Florges (+63pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Cresselia	21%	66%
Snorlax	0%	88%
Florges	1%	65%
Dusknoir	29%	74%
Cresselia	30%	83%
Rillaboom	23%	90%
Ampharos	45%	81%
Shadow Steelix	19%	95%
Shadow Malamar	21%	34%
Alolan Ninetales	73%	80%
Mimikyu	5%	31%
Shadow Dusknoir	7%	28%
Shadow Snorlax	58%	100%
Shadow Feraligatr	62%	100%
Shadow Corviknight	72%	100%
Miltank	1%	9%
Primarina	2%	8%
Seaking	88%	99%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	95%	97%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	1%	4%
Seismitoad	91%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Cresselia	50%	wins iff atk >= 179.88	93%	named
Snorlax	57%	wins iff sp >= 3,834,585	86%	named
Florges	43%	wins iff sp >= 3,913,415	89%	named
Dusknoir	58%	wins iff hp >= 154	80%	named
Cresselia	65%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	98%	named
Rillaboom	66%	wins iff sp >= 3,803,406	84%	named
Ampharos	68%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	90%	named
Shadow Steelix	69%	wins iff hp >= 151	86%	named
Shadow Malamar	29%	wins iff def >= 142.36	100%	named
Alolan Ninetales	77%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	85%	named
Mimikyu	22%	wins iff def >= 142.36	84%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	21%	wins iff def >= 143.49	88%	named
Shadow Snorlax	85%	wins iff hp >= 150	92%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	87%	wins iff hp >= 150	93%	named
Shadow Corviknight	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,630,815	93%	named
Miltank	6%	wins iff atk >= 184.99	97%	named
Primarina	6%	wins iff def >= 145.22	96%	named
Seaking	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,545,739	96%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	96%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	3%	wins iff def >= 145.65	98%	named
Seismitoad	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,466,843	97%	named

all scenarios: 100 win/loss bits (one per contested opponent per scenario) concatenated across 7 of 9 shield scenarios (0v2, 2v0 excluded as degenerate); 2579 distinct win patterns; K=2 clusters (silhouette 0.34); split at hp 155.50.

Sharpest single scenarios on this page: 0v1 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.65 over 6 contested opponents, split hp 157.50) and 1v2 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.59 over 9 contested opponents, split atk 179.69) -- pick them in the dropdown above.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2477	178.5	139.3	152	#463-#4096	37.2	-
C1	1619	179.2	141.8	157	#1-#3321	65.8	Shadow Ampharos [1v1] (+76pp), Shadow Dusknoir [1v1] (+74pp), Shadow Talonflame [1v1] (+74pp), Shadow Talonflame [2v1] (+74pp)

Per-cluster win rates vs each contested opponent

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Galarian Moltres [0v1]	45%	58%
Shadow Cresselia [2v2]	39%	68%
Shadow Lapras [1v0]	22%	92%
Dondozo [1v0]	35%	77%
Shadow Talonflame [1v1]	24%	98%
Shadow Talonflame [2v1]	24%	98%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	29%	95%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	31%	97%
Snorlax [2v2]	32%	96%
Florges [2v2]	15%	84%
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	13%	87%
Swampert [1v1]	36%	91%
Seaking [1v2]	17%	80%
Dusknoir [2v2]	32%	99%
Cresselia [1v0]	44%	86%
Shadow Walrein [0v0]	15%	78%
Forretress (Bug Bite) [1v0]	24%	62%
Shadow Ampharos [1v1]	9%	85%
Dusknoir [1v0]	37%	100%
Rillaboom [0v0]	57%	71%
Cresselia [1v1]	57%	71%
Toucannon [1v1]	10%	79%
Bellibolt [1v2]	60%	67%
Shadow Feraligatr [1v0]	11%	75%
Ninetales [2v1]	34%	40%
Walrein [2v1]	23%	55%
Cresselia [2v2]	57%	77%
Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	62%	71%
Rillaboom [2v2]	47%	97%
Shadow Forretress [2v1]	18%	57%
Ampharos [2v2]	65%	73%
Shadow Steelix [2v2]	50%	98%
Shadow Feraligatr [1v1]	64%	76%
Shadow Cradily [1v1]	64%	76%
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	17%	48%
Cresselia [0v0]	15%	51%
Toucannon [0v0]	58%	92%
Blastoise [0v0]	3%	64%
Virizion [0v1]	1%	67%
Florges [1v1]	0%	63%
Alolan Muk [2v1]	18%	36%
Virizion [1v2]	7%	51%
Ampharos [0v0]	2%	56%
Steelix [1v1]	61%	100%
Jellicent [2v1]	0%	59%
Talonflame [2v1]	61%	100%
Skeledirge [2v1]	62%	100%
Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	81%	71%
Mimikyu [2v2]	3%	52%
Walrein [0v0]	71%	88%
Shadow Dusknoir [0v0]	4%	47%
Shadow Dusknoir [2v2]	4%	47%
Shadow Corviknight [0v0]	12%	33%
Alolan Muk [1v0]	68%	100%
Forretress (Bug Bite) [2v1]	78%	86%
Lapras [2v1]	77%	90%
Florges [1v2]	1%	41%
Shadow Cresselia [1v2]	1%	38%
Shadow Snorlax [2v2]	75%	100%
Steelix [0v0]	0%	37%
Shadow Malamar [1v1]	77%	100%
Shadow Walrein [1v0]	78%	100%
Shadow Feraligatr [2v2]	78%	100%
Bellibolt [0v1]	0%	34%
Snorlax [0v0]	10%	18%
Dusknoir [1v1]	79%	100%
Shadow Corviknight [1v1]	79%	100%
Shadow Steelix [0v1]	79%	100%
Florges [0v1]	0%	30%
Shadow Corviknight [1v2]	3%	25%
Steelix [1v0]	82%	100%
Shadow Corviknight [2v2]	84%	100%
Shadow Feraligatr [2v1]	84%	100%
Seaking [2v1]	84%	100%
Shadow Forretress [1v0]	0%	24%
Steelix [0v1]	0%	23%
Clefable [2v1]	14%	2%
Primarina [1v1]	1%	21%
Deoxys (Defense) [0v0]	13%	2%
Deoxys (Defense) [1v2]	13%	2%
Shadow Cresselia [1v1]	0%	21%
Seismitoad [1v2]	5%	14%
Shadow Dusknoir [1v0]	90%	100%
Miltank [2v2]	9%	2%
Primarina [2v2]	1%	13%
Seaking [2v2]	92%	100%
Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	97%	95%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	94%	100%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [1v0]	0%	9%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [2v2]	1%	6%
Seismitoad [2v2]	95%	100%
Shadow Talonflame [1v0]	95%	100%
Ampharos [1v1]	95%	100%
Forretress (Bug Bite) [1v1]	5%	0%
Seaking [1v1]	4%	0%
Blastoise [2v1]	4%	0%
Shadow Corviknight [1v0]	96%	100%
Snorlax [2v1]	96%	100%
Cresselia [1v2]	0%	6%
Primarina [1v0]	0%	5%

Green tint = the cluster mostly wins that matchup, red tint = mostly loses; the percentage is the share of the cluster's IVs that win.

Stat rules that reproduce the clusters (in-sample accuracy 89.5%)

hp < 155.50:
  def < 142.91:
    hp < 153.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=1356)
    hp >= 153.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=420)
  def >= 142.91:
    atk < 176.97:
      -> cluster C0 (n=216)
    atk >= 176.97:
      -> cluster C1 (n=374)
hp >= 155.50:
  def < 138.31:
    hp < 158.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=332)
    hp >= 158.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=249)
  def >= 138.31:
    hp < 157.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=533)
    hp >= 157.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=616)

Depth-3 decision tree over (atk, def, hp). Accuracy is in-sample (regularized by a minimum leaf size), not cross-validated -- read it as "how well the clusters reduce to stat regions", not a prediction claim.

Matchup flip thresholds (candidate anchors)

The single stat and threshold that most accurately predicts win/loss across all IVs -- misclassifications allowed, so it is a diagnostic and a candidate anchor, not a build target. The "flips at" cutoffs under "Threats where your build choice matters" answer the other question (the lowest cutoff whose 75/25 split is clean) and are usually higher for the same opponent.

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Galarian Moltres [0v1]	50%	wins iff atk >= 179.42	100%	named
Shadow Cresselia [2v2]	50%	wins iff atk >= 179.88	93%	named
Shadow Lapras [1v0]	49%	wins iff hp >= 155	90%	named
Dondozo [1v0]	51%	wins iff sp >= 3,869,122	84%	named
Shadow Talonflame [1v1]	53%	wins iff sp >= 3,854,865	77%	named
Shadow Talonflame [2v1]	53%	wins iff sp >= 3,854,865	77%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	55%	wins iff hp >= 154	82%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	57%	wins iff def >= 141.58	79%	named
Snorlax [2v2]	57%	wins iff sp >= 3,834,585	86%	named
Florges [2v2]	43%	wins iff sp >= 3,913,415	89%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	43%	wins iff hp >= 156	76%	named
Swampert [1v1]	58%	wins iff sp >= 3,843,843	84%	named
Seaking [1v2]	42%	wins iff sp >= 3,918,095	88%	named
Dusknoir [2v2]	58%	wins iff hp >= 154	80%	named
Cresselia [1v0]	60%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	86%	named
Shadow Walrein [0v0]	40%	wins iff sp >= 3,931,886	83%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite) [1v0]	39%	wins iff def >= 141.30	97%	named
Shadow Ampharos [1v1]	39%	wins iff hp >= 158	79%	named
Dusknoir [1v0]	62%	wins iff hp >= 154	83%	named
Rillaboom [0v0]	62%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	100%	named
Cresselia [1v1]	62%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	100%	named
Toucannon [1v1]	37%	wins iff hp >= 155	77%	named
Bellibolt [1v2]	63%	wins iff atk < 181.78	93%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [1v0]	37%	wins iff sp >= 3,935,620	88%	named
Ninetales [2v1]	36%	wins iff atk >= 181.50	100%	named
Walrein [2v1]	36%	wins iff def >= 141.84	100%	named
Cresselia [2v2]	65%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	98%	named
Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	66%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	97%	named
Rillaboom [2v2]	66%	wins iff sp >= 3,803,406	84%	named
Shadow Forretress [2v1]	33%	wins iff sp >= 3,951,885	84%	named
Ampharos [2v2]	68%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	90%	named
Shadow Steelix [2v2]	69%	wins iff hp >= 151	86%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [1v1]	69%	wins iff atk >= 176.46	100%	named
Shadow Cradily [1v1]	69%	wins iff atk >= 176.46	100%	named
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	29%	wins iff def >= 142.36	100%	named
Cresselia [0v0]	29%	wins iff atk >= 180.34	86%	named
Toucannon [0v0]	72%	wins iff sp >= 3,594,403	74%	named
Blastoise [0v0]	27%	wins iff sp >= 4,038,420	85%	named
Virizion [0v1]	27%	wins iff hp >= 157	83%	named
Florges [1v1]	25%	wins iff hp >= 159	85%	named
Alolan Muk [2v1]	25%	wins iff atk >= 185.44	83%	named
Virizion [1v2]	24%	wins iff hp >= 159	84%	named
Ampharos [0v0]	24%	wins iff sp >= 4,019,153	89%	named
Steelix [1v1]	76%	wins iff sp >= 3,736,287	89%	named
Jellicent [2v1]	24%	wins iff hp >= 158	90%	named
Talonflame [2v1]	77%	wins iff sp >= 3,725,661	88%	named
Skeledirge [2v1]	77%	wins iff sp >= 3,700,331	85%	named
Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	77%	wins iff atk >= 177.47	85%	named
Mimikyu [2v2]	22%	wins iff def >= 142.36	84%	named
Walrein [0v0]	78%	wins iff atk >= 175.45	97%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [0v0]	21%	wins iff sp >= 4,024,411	87%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [2v2]	21%	wins iff def >= 143.49	88%	named
Shadow Corviknight [0v0]	20%	wins iff atk >= 181.67	90%	named
Alolan Muk [1v0]	81%	wins iff hp >= 151	96%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite) [2v1]	81%	wins iff atk >= 174.45	100%	named
Lapras [2v1]	83%	wins iff atk >= 173.44	95%	named
Florges [1v2]	17%	wins iff sp >= 4,026,952	90%	named
Shadow Cresselia [1v2]	15%	wins iff sp >= 4,044,644	91%	named
Shadow Snorlax [2v2]	85%	wins iff hp >= 150	92%	named
Steelix [0v0]	15%	wins iff hp >= 159	90%	named
Shadow Malamar [1v1]	86%	wins iff sp >= 3,646,472	91%	named
Shadow Walrein [1v0]	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,678,021	90%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [2v2]	87%	wins iff hp >= 150	93%	named
Bellibolt [0v1]	13%	wins iff sp >= 4,046,119	94%	named
Snorlax [0v0]	13%	wins iff atk >= 183.22	91%	named
Dusknoir [1v1]	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,667,359	93%	named
Shadow Corviknight [1v1]	87%	wins iff hp >= 149	90%	named
Shadow Steelix [0v1]	88%	wins iff hp >= 150	94%	named
Florges [0v1]	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,081,606	92%	named
Shadow Corviknight [1v2]	12%	wins iff def < 135.15	88%	named
Steelix [1v0]	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,606,296	91%	named
Shadow Corviknight [2v2]	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,630,815	93%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [2v1]	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,643,758	94%	named
Seaking [2v1]	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,618,051	93%	named
Shadow Forretress [1v0]	10%	wins iff sp >= 4,096,761	93%	named
Steelix [0v1]	9%	wins iff sp >= 4,079,056	94%	named
Clefable [2v1]	9%	wins iff atk >= 184.88	100%	named
Primarina [1v1]	9%	wins iff sp >= 4,079,056	94%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [0v0]	9%	wins iff atk >= 184.88	100%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [1v2]	9%	wins iff atk >= 184.88	100%	named
Shadow Cresselia [1v1]	8%	wins iff sp >= 4,100,816	94%	named
Seismitoad [1v2]	8%	wins iff def >= 144.35	92%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [1v0]	94%	wins iff sp >= 3,599,691	96%	named
Miltank [2v2]	6%	wins iff atk >= 184.99	97%	named
Primarina [2v2]	6%	wins iff def >= 145.22	96%	named
Seaking [2v2]	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,545,739	96%	named
Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	96%	wins iff atk >= 172.43	98%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	96%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [1v0]	3%	wins iff sp >= 4,135,761	97%	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [2v2]	3%	wins iff def >= 145.65	98%	named
Seismitoad [2v2]	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,466,843	97%	named
Shadow Talonflame [1v0]	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,466,843	97%	named
Ampharos [1v1]	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,563,916	98%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite) [1v1]	3%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Seaking [1v1]	3%	wins iff atk >= 186.55	100%	named
Blastoise [2v1]	3%	wins iff atk >= 186.55	100%	named
Shadow Corviknight [1v0]	98%	wins iff sp >= 3,543,603	99%	named
Snorlax [2v1]	98%	wins iff sp >= 3,464,295	98%	named
Cresselia [1v2]	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,113,397	99%	named
Primarina [1v0]	2%	wins iff sp >= 4,155,273	98%	named

Rows are ordered by discriminating power (win rate closest to 50%). "Rule accuracy" is how well that single stat threshold predicts the win/loss across all IVs, and is only shown when it beats always-predicting the majority outcome; high-accuracy UNNAMED rows are candidate new anchors. "Named" means an authored anchor names that opponent (alt-moveset / IV-variant rows inherit their base opponent's anchor).

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1726	178.1	138.6	152	#1006-#4096	18.1	-
C1	770	173.9	142.1	157	#24-#3565	27.0	Shadow Talonflame [1v1] (+91pp), Shadow Dusknoir [1v1] (+88pp), Dusknoir [2v2] (+88pp), Shadow Alolan Ninetales [0v0] (+85pp); trades away Alolan Ninetales [2v2] (-85pp), Alolan Ninetales [1v1] (-63pp), Rillaboom [0v0] (-56pp), Cresselia [1v1] (-56pp)
C2	1600	182.0	141.2	156	#1-#2584	38.8	Rillaboom [0v0] (+100pp), Cresselia [1v1] (+100pp), Alolan Ninetales [1v1] (+100pp), Alolan Ninetales [2v2] (+96pp); trades away Shadow Dusknoir [1v1] (-22pp), Shadow Ampharos [1v1] (-22pp), Shadow Dusknoir [2v2] (-22pp), Toucannon [1v1] (-19pp)

Computed at bake time for moveset POWDER_SNOW / CHILLING_WATER, DAZZLING_GLEAM with PvPoke default opponent IVs and bait-selective shield play, over the full opponent pool; this does not follow the scatter's moveset / opponent-IV / bait dropdowns or the opponent filter.

How this works

Per shield scenario: an opponent is contested when between 2% and 98% of this dive's IV spreads beat it (everyone else is settled and can't distinguish IVs). Each IV's fingerprint is its win/loss vector over those opponents; fingerprints are clustered bottom-up (agglomerative, Hamming distance, average linkage). The number of clusters, K, is chosen by silhouette -- a 0-to-1 score of how cleanly the fingerprints separate, where above about 0.5 the clusters are distinct groups and below 0.30 the headline says "weak separation" and the clusters are tendencies rather than tiers -- under a parsimony floor (a split must keep every cluster above a minimum size, and the smallest K in 2-6 within 0.03 of the best silhouette wins). Silhouettes are comparable between the scenarios on this page, not between species. Clusters are ordered weakest to strongest by mean contested wins. The scatter panels project the same 4,096 IV spreads onto each pair of battle stats; clusters that overlap completely in score separate cleanly there. A scenario is reported as degenerate (no clustering attempted) when it has fewer than 6 contested opponents or fewer than 8 distinct win patterns -- on that little data every candidate K scores near-perfectly, which is a measurement artifact and not structure -- and its bits are left out of the all scenarios fingerprint. A scenario that clears the floor but has no split keeping every cluster above the minimum size is reported as fragmented instead, and its bits still count toward the combined view. The all scenarios bits are ordered most-discriminating first, which is the tie-break the linkage uses when several merges are equally close. Replaces the retired score-gap cluster heuristic (2026-07), which usually (~77% of sampled runs) fired on float-level jitter in the opponent-averaged score, and even when it did catch a real tier could not name which matchups defined it.

Evidence

1. Header

Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) -- Ultra League

POWDER_SNOW / CHILLING_WATER, DAZZLING_GLEAM (arm 1 of 7)

Level view: L50. Bake 2026-09-27. Blob 20260927_113024_Ninetales_Alolan_ultra_shadow.replay.pkl.gz.

Opponent pool: 63 entries (Custom pool from ul_top60.txt (60 mons)). Grid: 4096 IV spreads x 9 shield scenarios.

Opponent-IV settings baked: PvPoke-default opponent IVs; PvPoke-default opponent IVs, focal never baits; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits.

Rankings snapshot 2026-09-27.

Stats are shadow-effective (attack x1.2 applied); the charge-move priority line is not (see Provenance).

2. Floor

Def >= 141.84 -- 1459 of 4096 spreads (35.6%).

Primitive: EXACT clean cut -- every spread at or above the line wins the cell and no spread below it does.

Mechanism: bulkpoint -- Walrein's (4/13/14) POWDER_SNOW drops from 4 to 3 damage into us across the cut (ICICLE_SPEAR 36 -> 35 and EARTHQUAKE 81 -> 80 step across it too).

Owns: 2v1 Walrein (rank 40).

After collapsing pool variants, this cut is owned by one base species (Walrein, rank 40); if it leaves the pool the cut has no owner.

Below the cut: 0 of 2637 spreads win the cell, and they score 350-447. At or above: 1459 of 1459 win, scoring 520-565.

Direction: the cut points the same way in 4 of 4 opponent-IV settings and 2 of 7 moveset arms (win rate at or above it at least 90%, and above the rate below it).

Partition is the stricter question, asked of the SAME printed line: it splits the cell exactly (everything at or above the line wins, everything below it loses) in 2 of 4 settings and 2 of 7 arms. A partition implies the direction test, never the other way round, so this count can never exceed the one above it. Does not partition: rank1, rank1:nobait.

Separability is a THIRD and non-comparable measurement -- each view's OWN cut, at whatever value it sits: 2 of 7 arms and 4 of 4 settings separate this cell at some value. Per arm -- POWDER_SNOW / CHILLING_WATER, DAZZLING_GLEAM: 141.84 (1459 spreads); POWDER_SNOW / CHILLING_WATER, ICE_BEAM: no clean cut (6.3% win); POWDER_SNOW / DAZZLING_GLEAM, WEATHER_BALL_ICE: 141.84 (1459 spreads); POWDER_SNOW / BLIZZARD, WEATHER_BALL_ICE: no clean cut (0.0% win); POWDER_SNOW / BLIZZARD, CHILLING_WATER: no clean cut (3.4% win); POWDER_SNOW / ICE_BEAM, WEATHER_BALL_ICE: no clean cut (0.0% win); POWDER_SNOW / WEATHER_BALL_ICE, CHILLING_WATER: no clean cut (6.3% win).

The same cell's cut in each setting: pvpoke 141.84; pvpoke:nobait 141.84; rank1 139.76; rank1:nobait 139.76.

Rocket-grunt encounters (this is a shadow, so it cannot be traded) needed to clear this line: 2 for a 50% chance, 4 for a 75% chance. Model: the grunt IV floor is NOT verified here, and the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid.

3. Lines on the other stats

Each of the three stats runs the same band, the same merge and the same gates, and selects its own line. One of them is printed above as the verdict; these are the others.

The choice is made on NET MATCHUPS, the only measure the three axes share and the only one that asks the same question of each: the spread that clears a line and wins the most matchups, against the spread that MISSES that same line and wins the most -- what crossing it buys. (What clearing it COSTS the stat-product build is a separate question, and field 10 answers it.) A difference under 1% of the 567 matchups on this dive is a tie, and goes to the stronger primitive, then to the line that holds in more settings and movesets, then to the larger clearer pool.

Net on this dive -- attack -6, defense +8. Printed: defense, on the larger net. The tie window on this dive is 5.67 matchups.

line	matchup	primitive	spreads	net (clear - miss)	mechanism
Atk >= 181.88	2v0 Tinkaton (rank 1)	exact	1235 (30.2%)	-6	POWDER_SNOW damage steps 3 -> 4 across the cut.

4. Example spreads

Existence proofs; each selection rule is printed with its spread.

rule	IVs	level	Atk / Def / HP	stat product	contested cells	all cells
highest stat product clearing the floor	7/15/15	L50.0	178.48 / 145.65 / 161	100.00% (#1)	99	275
bulkiest (max Def x HP) among clearers with SP >= 95%	0/15/15	L50.0	171.42 / 145.65 / 161	96.05% (#774)	80	256

Cells won by shield scenario

spread	0v0	0v1	0v2	1v0	1v1	1v2	2v0	2v1	2v2	total
rank-1 7/15/15	23	9	2	54	33	12	59	47	36	275
7/15/15	23	9	2	54	33	12	59	47	36	275
0/15/15	19	6	2	54	28	10	59	45	33	256

Clearers reach the CP cap at a median level of L50.0 (0 of 1459 at L45.0 or below) against L50.0 below the floor (0 of 2637).

5. Rank-1 check

Stat-product rank-1 is 7/15/15 at L50.0: 178.48 attack / 145.65 Def / 161 HP. It wins 275 of 567 cells (99 of the 120 contested ones).

It already clears the floor; there is no trade to make.

6. Alternative target

No HP-and-attack rectangle of 100 or more spreads guarantees a contested cell that the floor cannot.

7. Cost

This test finds no reverse single-stat clean cut: no cell on this dive is won by every LOW spread and lost by every high one.

The cost as an exact cell diff -- 0/15/15 (bulkiest (max Def x HP) among clearers with SP >= 95%) against rank-1: 0 cells gained, 19 lost.

Lost, top-20 opponents: 0v1 Florges (rank 12), 1v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14).

8. Rungs above

A rung is listed here when it keeps 25% of the grid and points the same way in at least 2 of the baked opponent-IV settings; the rest are in the tail sentence or the Dropped lines below. Being listed is not being eligible as a floor -- the floor gates are in the evidence block.

Co-gates inside a rung: a second-stat condition that, among the spreads clearing that rung, wins the named cell every time. Sufficient, never necessary -- the last column is what the spreads without it still win. 40 further co-gates are not listed.

cut	cells owned	spreads	settings	mechanism	other arms
Def >= 142.36	2v2 Malamar (Shadow) (rank 54)	1205 (29.4%)	4/4	Mechanism: bulkpoint -- Malamar (Shadow)'s (4/13/15) PSYWAVE drops from 4 to 3 damage into us across the cut.	dirty (29.4%); 186.54; 186.54; dirty (22.0%); 186.54; 186.54

Co-gates inside a rung

rung	co-gate	cell	rank	spreads holding it	win rate without it
Def >= 142.36	Atk >= 174.44	2v1 Forretress (Bug Bite)	rank 31	965	0.0%
Def >= 142.36	Atk >= 175.45	0v0 Walrein	rank 40	885	33.8%

9. Material clean cuts below the floor

No material rung below the floor.

10. Bulk

Clean cuts by axis: 11 on attack, 2 on Def, 0 on HP.

The bulk shape available inside the line -- the highest Def attained at each HP among the spreads clearing it:

Within the clearers, cells won in total run 193-275.

HP	highest Def attained	spreads
148	145.65	96
149	145.65	101
150	145.65	100
151	145.65	101
152	145.65	188
153	145.65	100
154	145.65	110
155	145.65	99
156	145.65	100
157	145.65	167
158	145.65	91
159	145.65	81
160	145.65	72
161	145.65	53

Co-gates inside the floor (every clearer in the sub-rectangle wins the cell; the rate outside it is printed beside): Atk >= 174.44 (1171 clearers) wins 2v1 Forretress (Bug Bite) rank 31, against 0.0% without it; Atk >= 175.45 (1075 clearers) wins 0v0 Walrein rank 40, against 32.3% without it; Atk >= 176.46 (979 clearers) wins 1v1 Feraligatr (Shadow) rank 14, against 0.0% without it; Atk >= 176.46 (979 clearers) wins 1v1 Steelix rank 44, against 59.4% without it; Atk >= 177.47 (883 clearers) wins 0v0 Rillaboom rank 21, against 0.0% without it; Atk >= 177.47 (883 clearers) wins 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) rank 25, against 6.2% without it; Atk >= 177.47 (883 clearers) wins 1v1 Cresselia rank 35, against 0.0% without it; Atk >= 177.47 (883 clearers) wins 2v1 Lapras rank 22, against 60.4% without it; Atk >= 177.47 (883 clearers) wins 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) rank 25, against 26.0% without it; Atk >= 177.47 (883 clearers) wins 2v2 Cresselia rank 35, against 12.5% without it; Atk >= 178.95 (691 clearers) wins 2v2 Rillaboom rank 21, against 46.9% without it; Atk >= 179.42 (688 clearers) wins 0v1 Moltres (Galarian) rank 13, against 0.0% without it; Atk >= 179.88 (592 clearers) wins 0v0 Toucannon rank 49, against 56.4% without it; Atk >= 179.88 (592 clearers) wins 1v0 Cresselia rank 35, against 46.0% without it; Atk >= 179.88 (592 clearers) wins 2v2 Cresselia (Shadow) rank 46, against 23.2% without it; Atk >= 180.79 (486 clearers) wins 1v0 Dondozo rank 26, against 49.0% without it; Atk >= 180.79 (486 clearers) wins 1v1 Swampert rank 48, against 52.7% without it; Atk >= 181.50 (444 clearers) wins 2v1 Ninetales rank 34, against 0.0% without it; Atk >= 181.88 (364 clearers) wins 2v0 Tinkaton rank 1, against 0.0% without it; HP >= 151 (1162 clearers) wins 1v0 Muk (Alolan) rank 36, against 27.3% without it; HP >= 153 (873 clearers) wins 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) rank 30, against 31.2% without it; HP >= 154 (773 clearers) wins 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) rank 23, against 12.8% without it; HP >= 154 (773 clearers) wins 1v0 Dusknoir rank 24, against 67.8% without it; HP >= 154 (773 clearers) wins 1v1 Steelix rank 44, against 71.6% without it; HP >= 154 (773 clearers) wins 1v1 Toucannon rank 49, against 16.9% without it; HP >= 154 (773 clearers) wins 2v2 Dusknoir rank 24, against 67.8% without it; HP >= 155 (663 clearers) wins 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) rank 27, against 47.4% without it; HP >= 156 (564 clearers) wins 1v1 Swampert rank 48, against 48.6% without it; HP >= 157 (464 clearers) wins 0v0 Toucannon rank 49, against 62.0% without it; HP >= 157 (464 clearers) wins 0v1 Virizion rank 6, against 18.7% without it; HP >= 157 (464 clearers) wins 1v1 Florges rank 12, against 11.8% without it; HP >= 157 (464 clearers) wins 1v2 Virizion rank 6, against 10.9% without it; HP >= 157 (464 clearers) wins 2v2 Snorlax rank 11, against 57.5% without it; HP >= 157 (464 clearers) wins 2v2 Rillaboom rank 21, against 59.0% without it; HP >= 157 (464 clearers) wins 2v2 Steelix (Shadow) rank 47, against 58.4% without it; HP >= 158 (297 clearers) wins 0v0 Walrein rank 40, against 77.6% without it; HP >= 158 (297 clearers) wins 0v0 Steelix rank 44, against 6.3% without it; HP >= 158 (297 clearers) wins 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) rank 14, against 36.5% without it; HP >= 158 (297 clearers) wins 2v0 Registeel rank 28, against 15.1% without it; HP >= 158 (297 clearers) wins 2v1 Jellicent rank 16, against 17.6% without it; HP >= 158 (297 clearers) wins 2v2 Florges rank 12, against 43.2% without it; HP >= 159 (206 clearers) wins 1v0 Cresselia rank 35, against 62.6% without it. These are sufficient conditions, never necessary ones.

11. Coverage

What each of Walrein's own 4096 spreads asks of our defense: the lowest attainable value that holds its POWDER_SNOW to 3 damage (from 4).

"held" is the share of that species' own grid whose attack is at or below the row's, and so is held by the same value: the damage it does to us is its attack over our defense, so its IV grid traces out the ladder the same way an attacker's does.

No spread of ours reaches the value the max-attack Walrein (7 spreads) asks for at all.

opponent build	defense you need	held	focal clearers
rank-1 (0/15/15)	139.76	0.2%	2264
PvPoke default (4/13/14)	141.84	7.0%	1459
10/10/10 (raid/research floor)	144.78	48.1%	403
grid median	144.95	50.7%	389
hundo (15/15/15)	145.21	55.2%	200
12/12/12 (lucky trade)	145.21	55.8%	200
the max-attack Walrein (7 spreads)	-	100.0%	0

"focal" is the count of our spreads at or above that value. The printed floor is the PvPoke-default row; it is the line every reference tool quotes, not a guarantee against every build of that species.

12. Mirror

Against the pool's own Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) entry. Seat: our side is the optimised row; the mirror opponent always baits.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 2609 0 0 4096 3165 0 4096 4096 4008.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 2609 0 0 4096 3165 0 4096 4096 0.

shields	win rate below the floor	win rate at/above	win rate over the whole grid
0v0	45.8%	72.4%	55.2%
0v1	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
0v2	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
1v0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
1v1	33.4%	100.0%	57.1%
1v2	0.0%	0.0%	0.0%
2v0	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
2v1	100.0%	100.0%	100.0%
2v2	94.4%	100.0%	96.4%

13. Changes the score, not the matchup

Cells won (or lost) by every spread where the battle score still steps by at least 60 at one attainable attack value.

Ordered by how close the step comes to the win line (500), nearest first: the question this field answers is how close a cell is to becoming a matchup, not how large the swing inside it is.

12 of 16 steps are listed, closest to the win line first; 4 more are not.

value	cell	rank	score step	points from 500	outcome
Atk >= 174.44	2v2 Forretress (Bug Bite)	rank 31	334 -> 450	50 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 181.42	2v2 Ninetales	rank 34	220 -> 430	70 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 184.88	0v1 Deoxys (Defense)	rank 42	293 -> 392	108 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 174.44	0v0 Forretress (Shadow)	rank 39	269 -> 380	120 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 175.45	1v0 Walrein	rank 40	624 -> 695	124 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 182.51	0v0 Malamar (Shadow)	rank 54	810 -> 649	149 (closing)	won on both sides
Atk >= 177.47	1v0 Rillaboom	rank 21	658 -> 814	158 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 178.47	2v2 Bellibolt	rank 57	719 -> 659	159 (closing)	won on both sides
Atk >= 180.34	2v0 Cresselia	rank 35	683 -> 820	183 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 181.23	2v1 Swampert	rank 48	692 -> 871	192 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 186.54	1v2 Blastoise	rank 29	168 -> 283	217 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 181.67	2v0 Corviknight (Shadow)	rank 4	717 -> 817	217 (widening)	won on both sides

14. Not claimed

107 of 120 contested matchups have no clean single-stat rule and are not claimed.

6 of 87 top-50 matchups are listed, one per base species and closest to an even split first; 81 more are not.

cell	rank	win rate inside the floor
1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow)	rank 14	49.4%
0v0 Walrein (Shadow)	rank 41	50.9%
2v2 Dusknoir (Shadow)	rank 27	48.5%
0v0 Blastoise	rank 29	47.8%
2v2 Mimikyu	rank 10	52.2%
2v2 Cresselia (Shadow)	rank 46	54.4%

15. How sure

11 clean attack cuts, 2 on Def, 0 on HP, over 120 contested cells (176 cells are won by every spread, 271 lost by every spread).

Scenarios barred from carrying a floor -- fewer than 6 contested cells, or fewer than 8 distinct opponent columns among them; the dive page's "degenerate" flag applies the same two numbers to its own stricter counts, so it can flag a different set: 0v2 (1 contested, 3 distinct opponent columns).

The printed floor partitions its cell exactly in 2 of 4 opponent-IV settings and 2 of 7 arms; its direction survives in 4 and 2 of them. Separately, and not comparably, the cell has a clean cut at SOME value in 4 settings and 2 arms.

It is owned by one base species (Walrein); if it leaves the pool the floor has no owner.

Both baked opponent cohorts sit low in Walrein's own attack grid (0.2% and 7.0% of it at or below them, and so held by the same value), so "2 of 4 settings" is not robustness against attack-weighted opponent builds; the coverage ladder is.

The level-51 view has its own cut for the same cell: 141.84 with 1666 spreads clearing, where the L50 literal applied to the L51 grid would select 1666.

Not measured here: opponent IVs outside the baked cohorts, post-match HP and shields, XL or dust cost, and any live-game check of the priority convention.

16. Provenance

Every threshold in this section is one of three things, and each is badged where it is printed. An EXACT clean cut: every spread at or above it wins the named cell and no spread below it does. A ONE-SIDED GATE: one side is pure and the other is at least 97% pure -- either nothing below it wins (clearing it is necessary) or everything at or above it wins (clearing it is sufficient). A NEAR-EXACT split: at most 0.5% of the grid sits on the wrong side of it in total. The win predicate is gopvpsim.battle.is_win (score > 500; 500 itself is a tie, not a win).

That is stricter than the two numbers the dive page prints for the same opponent: the Threats "flips at" boundary (a 75/25 gate, so spreads on the passing side can still lose) and the Matchup clusters flip table's single-stat split for that one opponent (the most accurate such split, misclassifications allowed). The cluster line in "How sure" above is a third thing again: not one opponent but the stat rule that reproduces that section's "all scenarios" partition of the whole grid.

Priority ties: the coverage ladder counts an exact attack tie as NOT beaten. The engine is seat-dependent on an exact tie, so a tied line is not a guarantee in either direction.

Ranks and opponent builds are read live from the 2026-09-27 rankings snapshot and the current gamemaster; this blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so the render is a function of the blob plus those two live reads.

Auto-derived: this section is generated by scripts/deep_dive_brief.py from the replay blob. No human prose is in it.

How the line was selected (gates and guards)

Decision band for the floor (D1): the lowest ELIGIBLE rung whose clearer pool sits inside [25%, 60%] of the grid. Materiality band for a rung: [10%, 90%].

To be ELIGIBLE AS THE FLOOR -- not to be listed as a rung -- a cut needs at least 20 attack/20 defense/5 HP distinct attainable values below it, an opponent of rank 50 or better outside the caveat list, a non-degenerate shield scenario, a win rate at or above the cut of at least 90% in every setting, and a closed-form mechanism. Listing is a weaker bar: a rung is printed when it keeps 25% of the grid (above the floor) or sits in the materiality band (below it) AND points the same way in at least 2 settings, so a listed rung may be unattributed, low-ranked or 2-of-4.

A cut can fail several gates at once, so the failure tally below sums to more than the number of cuts.

Co-gate sub-rectangles need 5% of the grid; the alternative target needs 100 members; a score-only step needs 60 points. These constants are calibrated on one species and are parameters of the stage that uses them, not tuned per dive.

Floor pool by primitive on the defense axis -- the axis the cross-stat rule selected -- each selected on its own under the same band and the same gates: exact -> Def >= 141.84 (2v1 Walrein, 35.6%); one-sided gate -> no candidate in the band; near-exact -> no candidate in the band. Selected: the exact at Def >= 141.84. Selection takes the lowest eligible rung in the band; a stronger primitive within 0.50 stat points of it wins the tie, in the order exact, one-sided gate, near-exact. A gate needs 97% of its dirty side pointing the right way; a near-exact split needs at most 0.5% of the grid on the wrong side. Only exact rungs merge, in either direction.

Degradation ladder: rung reached = floor.

Of 13 clean cuts, 2 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-direction 7, G-material-gap 6, G-material-lo 3, G-rank 2, G-attributed 1.

Of 37 one-sided gate and near-exact candidates, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-material-hi 35, G-material-gap 35, G-attributed 29, G-rank 16, G-direction 15, G-material-lo 2.

G-cmp-fresh (WARN, not a failure): 1 cut(s) have a live priority line within 0.50 attack of the cut but outside its gap, so they print unattributed: 2v1 Ninetales. This blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so a rebalance since the bake would look exactly like this.

Floor cell in pvpoke: clean cut 141.84, 1459 spreads

Floor cell in pvpoke:nobait: clean cut 141.84, 1459 spreads

Floor cell in rank1: clean cut 139.76, 2264 spreads

Floor cell in rank1:nobait: clean cut 139.76, 2264 spreads

Floor cell on arm 'POWDER_SNOW / CHILLING_WATER, DAZZLING_GLEAM': clean cut 141.84, 1459 spreads

Floor cell on arm 'POWDER_SNOW / CHILLING_WATER, ICE_BEAM': no clean cut, 6.3% win

Floor cell on arm 'POWDER_SNOW / DAZZLING_GLEAM, WEATHER_BALL_ICE': clean cut 141.84, 1459 spreads

Floor cell on arm 'POWDER_SNOW / BLIZZARD, WEATHER_BALL_ICE': no clean cut, 0.0% win

Floor cell on arm 'POWDER_SNOW / BLIZZARD, CHILLING_WATER': no clean cut, 3.4% win

Floor cell on arm 'POWDER_SNOW / ICE_BEAM, WEATHER_BALL_ICE': no clean cut, 0.0% win

Floor cell on arm 'POWDER_SNOW / WEATHER_BALL_ICE, CHILLING_WATER': no clean cut, 6.3% win

Closest dirty thresholds on cells with no clean rule: 2v2 Cresselia (Shadow) Atk >= 179.88 (273 spreads on the wrong side); 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) HP >= 155 (411 spreads on the wrong side); 1v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) Def >= 141.30 (112 spreads on the wrong side); 2v2 Cresselia Atk >= 177.47 (84 spreads on the wrong side).

band	defense line it selects	cell
[25%, 60%]	141.84	2v1 Walrein
[25%, 55%]	141.84	2v1 Walrein
[25%, 50%]	141.84	2v1 Walrein
[20%, 60%]	141.84	2v1 Walrein
[30%, 60%]	141.84	2v1 Walrein
[25%, 70%]	141.84	2v1 Walrein

Terms used here

build criteria: Which shield scenarios the ranking counts: all nine equally, the three even ones, or 1v1 alone.
build: A region of the IV grid you can aim at -- every spread that clears the same combination of thresholds, at least fifty of them.
guaranteed: Won by every single spread in the region, not by most of them.
decision matchup: A (shield scenario, opponent) pair the IV choice decides: a top-50 opponent that some spreads on this grid beat and others lose to.
opponent-IV mode: One of the ways every opponent was made for this bake -- PvPoke-default IVs or the bulkiest ones, each with and without the focal side baiting -- so a claim that holds in all of them does not depend on how the opponent was made.
bulk box: A rule that is a defense floor and an HP floor and nothing else -- a rectangle on the defense / HP plane.
stat-product rank-1 (SP1): The IV spread with the largest attack x defense x HP at this league's CP cap -- the bulk-first spread most IV tools list first. Written SP1 where it is named repeatedly.
material: A matchup no single-stat threshold of a hundred or more spreads wins more than 95% of the time, so it takes two stats at once to claim it.
stat product: Attack x defense x HP at the league's CP cap, the usual one-number summary of an IV spread.
wide: The looser rule drawn around a region of the grid: it holds every spread that region holds and more, so it wins less for every member but is easier to hit.
outside rate: How often the spreads left OUT of a region win the same matchup its own members all win -- one the rest of the grid takes anyway is not what you bought.
charge-move priority (CMP): When both sides throw a charged move on the same turn, the higher attack stat goes first.
contested matchups: The matchups some IV spreads on this grid win and others lose -- the only ones an IV choice can change.
rung: An attack value above the line at which some further matchup flips for every spread that reaches it.
UpSet plot: A bar chart of set intersections: each column is one candidate region, and the dots under it mark which named sets it lies inside (Lex et al. 2014).
bulkpoint: A defense value across which an opponent's damage into you steps down by a whole point, or an HP value across which the number of hits they need to knock you out changes.
one-sided gate: A stat value with one clean side: either nothing below it wins the matchup, or everything at or above it does -- so clearing it is required, or enough, but not both.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 179 spreads by list	179	30 of 43 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 54 of 87 overall, 5 of them material; 26 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (outside 18%)	16: 0v0 Steelix, 0v1 Florges, +14 more	9/6/15 (89 of 189 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (30 of 43 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 54 of 87 overall), its 179 members all inside attack IV 9-14, defense IV 3-15, HP IV 9-15; that box also holds 367 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (8) 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 28%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 35%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 35%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 48% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 33%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (9) 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 46% 1v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 55% 1v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 63%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 69% 1v1 (10) 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 64%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 67%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (3) 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 18%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 22%; material; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (1) 2v1 (8) 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 28% 2v1 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 38%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 85% 2v1 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 85% 2v2 (12) 2v2 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 60%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 68%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 69%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (179), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 180.70 and Def >= 137.69 and HP >= 157	399	28 of 43 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 48 of 87 overall, 4 of them material; 23 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	22: 0v0 Blastoise, 0v0 Steelix, +20 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 97% of the same spreads (12 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 179 spreads in 399 of its own, and keeps 28 of Build 1's 30 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (48 of its 54 overall, 4 of them material). The 6 it gives up out here: 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (grid 22%), 2v1 Jellicent (grid 32%) and 1v1 Florges (grid 33%), and 3 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 145.80 and HP >= 159 (bulk box)	57	28 of 43 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 55 of 87 overall, 3 of them material; 36 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v2 Muk (Alolan) (outside 1%)	15: 0v0 Rillaboom, 0v0 Dusknoir (Shadow), +13 more	6/14/14 (93 of 189 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (28 of 43 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 55 of 87 overall), its 57 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 25% 0v0 Blastoise (rank 29) -- outside 37% 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 66% 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 77% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 18%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 35%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 (1) 0v2 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 18% 1v0 (12) 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 5%; material 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 13% 1v0 Forretress (Bug Bite) (rank 31) -- outside 48% 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 48% 1v1 (9) 1v1 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 14%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 32%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 45% 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 52%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (1) 1v2 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 31% 2v0 (3) 2v0 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 10%; material 2v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 22% 2v1 (7) 2v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 30% 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 31% 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 40% 2v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 85% 2v2 (14) 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 1%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 27% 2v2 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 29%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (57), highest stat product first

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2240	177.6	140.4	154	#4-#4096	3.0	-
C1	1856	182.1	141.6	156	#1-#2864	8.9	Ampharos (+70pp), Shadow Walrein (+69pp), Cresselia (+65pp), Shadow Dusknoir (+64pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Walrein	19%	88%
Cresselia	9%	74%
Blastoise	19%	59%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	42%	96%
Ampharos	0%	70%
Rillaboom	43%	100%
Shadow Dusknoir	2%	66%
Steelix	22%	32%
Shadow Corviknight	2%	55%
Toucannon	64%	93%
Snorlax	2%	37%
Walrein	72%	100%
Deoxys (Defense)	9%	16%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Walrein	50%	wins iff sp >= 3,938,633	79%	named
Cresselia	38%	wins iff atk >= 180.34	89%	named
Blastoise	38%	wins iff sp >= 4,036,015	82%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	67%	wins iff sp >= 3,878,990	84%	named
Ampharos	32%	wins iff sp >= 4,023,380	86%	named
Rillaboom	69%	wins iff atk >= 177.51	100%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	31%	wins iff sp >= 4,004,517	82%	named
Steelix	26%	wins iff hp >= 159	85%	named
Shadow Corviknight	26%	wins iff atk >= 181.67	90%	named
Toucannon	77%	wins iff sp >= 3,846,070	79%	named
Snorlax	18%	wins iff atk >= 183.22	92%	named
Walrein	85%	wins iff atk >= 175.48	96%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	12%	wins iff atk >= 184.88	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3403	179.8	140.6	154	#128-#4096	1.9	-
C1	693	178.8	142.8	160	#1-#2647	5.2	Florges (+85pp), Bellibolt (+85pp), Steelix (+80pp), Virizion (+78pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Galarian Moltres	57%	51%
Virizion	22%	100%
Bellibolt	8%	93%
Florges	4%	90%
Steelix	3%	84%
Shadow Steelix	92%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Galarian Moltres	56%	wins iff atk >= 179.42	100%	named
Virizion	35%	wins iff hp >= 157	82%	named
Bellibolt	22%	wins iff sp >= 4,048,483	90%	named
Florges	19%	wins iff sp >= 4,084,394	88%	named
Steelix	17%	wins iff sp >= 4,079,056	90%	named
Shadow Steelix	94%	wins iff hp >= 150	96%	named

Moveset: Switching movesets reloads the page; pasted CSV will need to be re-loaded. Shields: Build criteria: Opponent IVs: Bait: Y-axis: Color: Anchors: Build criteria weights shield scenarios in: Which one to build?, the all-scenarios clusters, and Shields = All (by build criteria). Nothing else on this page is re-weighted by it. Threshold tiers (e.g. GH Great / GH Good) are expert stat-cutoff regions defined in Threshold Tiers below. Hover legend to isolate; click to lock.

Check my collection - Your collection stays in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Paste your Poke Genie CSV export below, or click Choose file… to load one from disk. You’ll see which of your Ninetales (Alolan)s (and pre-evolutions) qualify for each tier, overlaid on the scatter plot.

Show only my mons

Or enter one at a time - Atk/Def/HP IVs (0-15), level, shadow flag. Same format as PvPoke / PvPIVs.

Species Atk Def HP Level Shadow

Compare candidates - up to 7 of your IV spreads, side by side: wins, mirror, and the close calls that decide the build

Add a spread: Atk Def HP 0 / 7 added

Highlight IVs:

Top IVs Rows: Ranked by this dive's battle simulation (not fetched from PvPoke). Click any column header to sort.

Battle-Rating Distribution

Per-matchup battle-rating distribution for the reference IV (PvPoke default or Rank 1, matching the Opponent-IVs dropdown) across the opponent pool, under the currently-selected Shields / Opponent-IVs / Bait.

Powder Snow / Chilling Water, Dazzling Gleam

IV Recommendations

Moveset: Powder Snow / Chilling Water, Dazzling Gleam. Vs PvPoke default opponents.

IV Flavor Guide (Simulation)

Auto-generated from simulation matchup data. Flavor names (e.g. "Premium Bulk", "Fortified {Opp}", "{Opp} Slayer") are derived from which opponents each IV cluster beats, not from the expert-authored Threshold Tiers section above. This IV Flavor Guide and the Threshold Tiers answer different questions and may not line up 1:1. New to flavor cards? The IV Flavor Guide walks through the six name families and the trade-off layout.

In Ultra League, Ninetales (Alolan) has 4 flavors: General Good, Blastoise Slayer, Seaking Slayer, and Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) Mirror Bulk. In general, the General Good variation may be the flavor of choice, as it plays up Ninetales (Alolan)'s potential vs Dusknoir, Steelix (Shadow), Ampharos, among others.

Flavor	IVs	%	Catches needed
General Good [Recommended]	3596	87.8%	almost any will do
Blastoise Slayer	88	2.1%	~32-64 for a 50-75% chance
Seaking Slayer	88	2.1%	~32-64 for a 50-75% chance
Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) Mirror Bulk	2009	49.0%	~2-3 for a 50-75% chance

General Good (171.49 Atk, 134.76 Def, 149 HP) [Recommended]

134.76 Def and 149 HP is a safe baseline for Ninetales (Alolan), with an attack floor of 171.49 Atk for coverage against key opponents.

149 HP is also a safe spot, helping secure the mirror and key matchups vs Ampharos, Blastoise.

135.04 Def with 149+ HP for Dusknoir (1v0, 2v2), Feraligatr (incl. Shadow) (2v2), Florges (1v1, 2v2), Lapras (incl. Shadow) (1v0), Muk (Alolan) (1v0, 2v1), Ninetales (Alolan) (incl. Shadow) (0v0), Snorlax (incl. Shadow) (2v2), Steelix (incl. Shadow) (0v1, 2v2), Talonflame (incl. Shadow) (1v1, 2v1), Virizion (0v1, 1v2), Bellibolt (1v2), Jellicent (2v1), Toucannon (1v1), Walrein (incl. Shadow) (0v0)
135.44 Def with 153+ HP for Dusknoir (incl. Shadow) (1v1), Snorlax (2v2), Cresselia (1v0), Registeel (2v0), Ampharos (1v1), Regidrago (0v1)
136.02 Def with 152+ HP for Blastoise (0v0), Toucannon (1v1), Virizion (0v1), Dusknoir (incl. Shadow) (1v1)
136.72 Def with 158+ HP for the Blastoise (0v0)
137.41 Def with 155+ HP for Feraligatr (incl. Shadow) (1v0), Florges (1v1), Seaking (1v2), Ampharos (1v1), Cresselia (incl. Shadow) (2v2), Forretress (Bug Bite) (1v0), Regidrago (0v2)
138.11 Def with 157+ HP for Mimikyu (2v2), Virizion (1v2), Regidrago (0v1), Walrein (2v1)
138.52 Def with 159+ HP for the Dusknoir (incl. Shadow) (2v2)
138.66 Def with 150+ HP for Jellicent (2v1), Snorlax (2v1), Ampharos (incl. Shadow) (1v1), Forretress (incl. Shadow) (1v0), Miltank (2v1)

Blastoise Slayer (186.21 Atk, 149 HP)

The "Blastoise Slayer" Ninetales (Alolan) trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Blastoise 2v1, the Clefable 2v1, the Deoxys (Defense) 0v0, 1v2. Ninetales (Alolan) would need 186.21 Atk while maintaining 149 HP.

Note: The drop in bulk will cost several matchups, such as the Bellibolt 1v2.

Seaking Slayer (186.16 Atk, 149 HP)

The "Seaking Slayer" Ninetales (Alolan) trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Seaking 1v1, the Blastoise 2v1, the Clefable 2v1. Ninetales (Alolan) would need 186.16 Atk while maintaining 149 HP.

Note: The drop in bulk will cost several matchups, such as the Bellibolt 1v2.

Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) Mirror Bulk (140.23 Def, 148 HP)

The "Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) Mirror Bulk" Ninetales (Alolan) fortifies its bulk to gain the Forretress (Bug Bite) 1v0, and the Walrein 2v1. This requires 140.23 Def with 148 HP.

Rank-1 Ninetales (Alolan) (7/15/15) meets the General Good thresholds.

Simulation-Derived IV Tiers

Auto-derived from the sim (not expert-authored).

Threshold Tiers

Stat-target headlines from thresholds/*.toml, each grouped with the named anchors its spec clears and the IV spreads that meet it. Within each tier card, bullets are grouped by opponent and sorted by the required stat (Def or Atk) ascending - read top-to-bottom in the order a player would clear them as their stat grows. The flat list of every anchor (regardless of tier) lives in Anchor-Driven Matchup Flips below. New to tier cards? The Threshold Tiers guide walks through what the stat cutoffs and member counts mean. A tier's anchors come from two passes over the anchor list:

Primary bullets - the tier has a cutoff on the anchor's target axis (atk or def) that meets or exceeds the anchor's threshold. Consequences:
- Subset case: if tier A is strictly stricter than tier B on the anchor axis, A's bullet list is a superset of B's. Overlap is intentional.
- Crossed-cutoff case: tier A has only an atk cutoff, tier B has only a def cutoff - neither is a subset of the other. Atk anchors appear only on A; def anchors only on B.
- Slayer-axis IV-count case: two tiers can list the same atk anchor but have different member-IV counts because a stricter tier's def cutoff excludes def-sacrificing spreads that the looser tier keeps. Check the (−N vs parent) callout on the tier header to spot this at a glance.
Anchors we get for free (collapsed) - the tier has no cutoff on the anchor's target axis, but every IV in the tier clears the anchor's threshold anyway. These would be silently dropped by the primary filter; we surface them in a separate collapsed block so the card isn't misleading.

Blastoise Slayer · atk≥186.21, hp≥149 (88 IV spreads) (−51 vs Melmetal Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 60 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Blastoise, Clefable, Shadow Cradily, +25 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Blastoise (3 scenario flips).

181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Powder Snow) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Dazzling Gleam) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Chilling Water) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
173.53 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Dazzling Gleam) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1 with bait)
175.59 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Chilling Water) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1 with bait)
172.51 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
174.42 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
176.18 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
174.36 Atk for Rillaboom (Dazzling Gleam) vs Rillaboom (0v0, 2v2)
177.84 Atk for Rillaboom (Chilling Water) vs Rillaboom (0v0, 2v2)
172.12 Atk for Lapras (Chilling Water) vs Lapras (2v1)
172.89 Atk for Lapras (Dazzling Gleam) vs Lapras (2v1)
171.69 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0, 1v1, 2v1)
172.18 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0, 1v1, 2v1)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v1)
179.02 Atk for Dondozo (Dazzling Gleam) vs Dondozo (1v0)
186.21 Atk for Blastoise (Powder Snow) vs Blastoise (2v1)
173.03 Atk for Forretress (Chilling Water) vs Forretress (2v0)
178.37 Atk for Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Ninetales (2v1)
179.53 Atk for Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Ninetales (2v1)
174.15 Atk for Cresselia (Dazzling Gleam) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
175.33 Atk for Cresselia (Chilling Water) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
177.10 Atk for Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
185.37 Atk for Alolan Muk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Muk (2v1 with bait)
185.37 Atk for Alolan Muk (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Muk (2v1 with bait)
185.37 Atk for Alolan Muk (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Muk (2v1 with bait)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (2v1)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Powder Snow) vs Clefable (2v1)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Chilling Water) vs Clefable (2v1)
172.60 Atk for Walrein (Dazzling Gleam) vs Walrein (0v0)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Powder Snow) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Dazzling Gleam) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Chilling Water) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
186.16 Atk for Seaking (Powder Snow) vs Seaking (1v1)
186.16 Atk for Seaking (Dazzling Gleam) vs Seaking (1v1)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
181.04 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
172.79 Atk for Ampharos (Dazzling Gleam) vs Ampharos (2v2)
173.19 Atk for Ampharos (Chilling Water) vs Ampharos (2v2)
176.72 Atk for Ampharos (Powder Snow) vs Ampharos (2v2)
172.62 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
173.04 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
175.90 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
171.49 Atk for Virizion (Dazzling Gleam) vs Virizion (1v1 no bait)
185.06 Atk for Snorlax (Dazzling Gleam) vs Snorlax (2v1 no bait)
185.06 Atk for Snorlax (Chilling Water) vs Snorlax (2v1 no bait)
171.61 Atk for Guzzlord (Dazzling Gleam) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Powder Snow) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
173.18 Atk for Guzzlord (Chilling Water) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Powder Snow) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Dazzling Gleam) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Chilling Water) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
184.94 Atk for Miltank (Powder Snow) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
184.94 Atk for Miltank (Dazzling Gleam) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
185.96 Atk for Melmetal (Dazzling Gleam) vs Melmetal (2v0)
171.77 Atk for Feraligatr (Dazzling Gleam) vs Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
174.21 Atk for Dusknoir (Dazzling Gleam) vs Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
172.36 Atk for Runerigus (Dazzling Gleam) vs Runerigus (1v2)
171.71 Atk for Seismitoad (Dazzling Gleam) vs Seismitoad (1v1)

Anchors we get for free (17 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

134.99 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Snorlax bulk (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2 with bait)
134.78 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (2v2 with bait)
135.04 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (2v2 with bait)
134.80 Def + 153 HP for Dusknoir bulk (Poltergeist) vs Dusknoir (1v0, 2v2)
134.86 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
135.07 Def + 161 HP for Steelix bulk (Heavy Slam) vs Steelix (0v0)
134.99 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Steelix bulk (Crunch) vs Shadow Steelix (0v1, 2v2)
134.91 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 with bait)
135.03 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Talonflame bulk (Fly) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1, 2v1)
135.14 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Talonflame bulk (Fire Blast) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1, 2v1)
134.80 Def + 157 HP for Snorlax bulk (Superpower) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
134.99 Def + 157 HP for Snorlax bulk (Heavy Slam) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
134.85 Def + 158 HP for Registeel bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (2v0)
134.76 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Walrein bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
135.00 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
135.13 Def for Bellibolt bulk (Discharge) vs Bellibolt (1v2 with bait)
134.91 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (1v1 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

172.43 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [3840 IVs]
172.43 Atk + 149 HP flips Shadow Steelix (2v2) [3600 IVs]

Member IVs (88)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/4/9 👑	186.55	137.95	156	#308	-19	-10.5	-29.3	-13.1
15/3/10 👑	186.55	137.25	157	#332	-21	-8.4	-33.4	-13.2
15/2/10	186.55	136.55	157	#408	-23	-9.7	-34.9	-14.8
15/5/8 👑	186.55	138.65	155	#445	+0	-12.2	-35.1	-13.1
15/0/12 👑	186.55	135.15	158	#518	-23	-14.7	-35.1	-12.2
15/1/10	186.55	135.85	157	#524	-27	-11.0	-36.0	-15.5
15/1/11	186.55	135.85	157	#525	-27	-11.0	-36.0	-15.5
15/4/8	186.55	137.95	155	#577	+0	-11.3	-35.5	-17.7
15/11/2 👑	186.55	142.85	150	#578	+0	-14.7	-30.3	-11.3
15/12/1 👑	186.55	143.55	149	#626	+0	-14.1	-34.5	-12.3
15/3/9	186.55	137.25	156	#640	-25	-11.7	-40.5	-15.3
15/10/3 👑	186.55	142.15	151	#646	+0	-12.6	-36.7	-13.2
15/9/4 👑	186.55	141.45	152	#711	+0	-13.4	-39.7	-17.3
15/6/7 👑	186.55	139.35	154	#759	+0	-13.9	-41.8	-16.1
15/2/9	186.55	136.55	156	#819	-26	-12.5	-42.0	-18.4
15/3/8	186.55	137.25	155	#840	+0	-11.7	-41.7	-19.7
15/10/2	186.55	142.15	150	#848	+0	-13.4	-35.9	-19.2
15/5/7	186.55	138.65	154	#853	+0	-14.3	-42.2	-18.5
15/11/1	186.55	142.85	149	#905	+0	-13.7	-37.6	-15.0
15/0/10	186.55	135.15	157	#926	-29	-16.3	-43.2	-15.5
15/0/11	186.55	135.15	157	#927	-29	-16.3	-43.2	-15.5
15/7/6 👑	186.55	140.05	153	#928	+0	-14.5	-42.4	-19.1
15/1/9	186.55	135.85	156	#938	-30	-13.1	-42.2	-22.9
15/9/3	186.55	141.45	151	#946	+0	-14.2	-41.2	-23.0
15/6/6	186.55	139.35	153	#973	+0	-14.7	-42.6	-19.5
15/4/7	186.55	137.95	154	#976	+0	-14.1	-42.1	-20.1
15/2/8	186.55	136.55	155	#978	+0	-12.5	-43.5	-21.1
15/8/4	186.55	140.75	152	#986	+0	-15.8	-42.4	-19.0
15/8/5	186.55	140.75	152	#987	+0	-15.8	-42.4	-19.0
15/5/6	186.55	138.65	153	#1042	+0	-15.1	-43.0	-20.2
15/3/7	186.55	137.25	154	#1058	+0	-14.4	-43.2	-21.5
15/7/4	186.55	140.05	152	#1059	+0	-16.4	-43.7	-19.8
15/7/5	186.55	140.05	152	#1060	+0	-16.4	-43.7	-19.8
15/1/8	186.55	135.85	155	#1087	+0	-13.3	-43.4	-25.4
15/4/6	186.55	137.95	153	#1132	+0	-15.4	-43.7	-23.1
15/9/2	186.55	141.45	150	#1133	+0	-17.1	-39.4	-27.9
15/8/3	186.55	140.75	151	#1134	+0	-14.8	-44.3	-24.1
15/10/1	186.55	142.15	149	#1140	+0	-15.6	-41.8	-19.6
15/6/4	186.55	139.35	152	#1166	+0	-14.7	-44.0	-27.0
15/6/5	186.55	139.35	152	#1167	+0	-14.7	-44.0	-27.0
15/2/7	186.55	136.55	154	#1175	+0	-15.3	-46.8	-22.5
15/0/9	186.55	135.15	156	#1186	-37	-17.3	-47.0	-24.0
15/3/6	186.55	137.25	153	#1205	+0	-15.9	-44.9	-24.5
15/7/3	186.55	140.05	151	#1208	+0	-15.6	-45.4	-25.0
15/5/4	186.55	138.65	152	#1261	+0	-16.9	-44.5	-31.0
15/5/5	186.55	138.65	152	#1262	+0	-16.9	-44.5	-31.0
15/1/7	186.55	135.85	154	#1298	+0	-18.1	-46.2	-27.9
15/6/3	186.55	139.35	151	#1304	+0	-16.0	-44.8	-30.9
15/2/6	186.55	136.55	153	#1335	+0	-17.0	-50.2	-25.4
15/8/2	186.55	140.75	150	#1367	+0	-18.7	-45.6	-29.3
… 38 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Seaking Slayer · atk≥186.16, hp≥149 (88 IV spreads) (−51 vs Melmetal Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 59 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Clefable, Shadow Cradily, Cresselia, +24 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Seaking (2 scenario flips).

181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Powder Snow) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Dazzling Gleam) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Chilling Water) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
173.53 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Dazzling Gleam) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1 with bait)
175.59 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Chilling Water) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1 with bait)
172.51 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
174.42 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
176.18 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
174.36 Atk for Rillaboom (Dazzling Gleam) vs Rillaboom (0v0, 2v2)
177.84 Atk for Rillaboom (Chilling Water) vs Rillaboom (0v0, 2v2)
172.12 Atk for Lapras (Chilling Water) vs Lapras (2v1)
172.89 Atk for Lapras (Dazzling Gleam) vs Lapras (2v1)
171.69 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0, 1v1, 2v1)
172.18 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0, 1v1, 2v1)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v1)
179.02 Atk for Dondozo (Dazzling Gleam) vs Dondozo (1v0)
173.03 Atk for Forretress (Chilling Water) vs Forretress (2v0)
178.37 Atk for Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Ninetales (2v1)
179.53 Atk for Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Ninetales (2v1)
174.15 Atk for Cresselia (Dazzling Gleam) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
175.33 Atk for Cresselia (Chilling Water) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
177.10 Atk for Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
185.37 Atk for Alolan Muk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Muk (2v1 with bait)
185.37 Atk for Alolan Muk (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Muk (2v1 with bait)
185.37 Atk for Alolan Muk (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Muk (2v1 with bait)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (2v1)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Powder Snow) vs Clefable (2v1)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Chilling Water) vs Clefable (2v1)
172.60 Atk for Walrein (Dazzling Gleam) vs Walrein (0v0)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Powder Snow) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Dazzling Gleam) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Chilling Water) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
186.16 Atk for Seaking (Powder Snow) vs Seaking (1v1)
186.16 Atk for Seaking (Dazzling Gleam) vs Seaking (1v1)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
181.04 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
172.79 Atk for Ampharos (Dazzling Gleam) vs Ampharos (2v2)
173.19 Atk for Ampharos (Chilling Water) vs Ampharos (2v2)
176.72 Atk for Ampharos (Powder Snow) vs Ampharos (2v2)
172.62 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
173.04 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
175.90 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
171.49 Atk for Virizion (Dazzling Gleam) vs Virizion (1v1 no bait)
185.06 Atk for Snorlax (Dazzling Gleam) vs Snorlax (2v1 no bait)
185.06 Atk for Snorlax (Chilling Water) vs Snorlax (2v1 no bait)
171.61 Atk for Guzzlord (Dazzling Gleam) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Powder Snow) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
173.18 Atk for Guzzlord (Chilling Water) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Powder Snow) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Dazzling Gleam) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Chilling Water) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
184.94 Atk for Miltank (Powder Snow) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
184.94 Atk for Miltank (Dazzling Gleam) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
185.96 Atk for Melmetal (Dazzling Gleam) vs Melmetal (2v0)
171.77 Atk for Feraligatr (Dazzling Gleam) vs Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
174.21 Atk for Dusknoir (Dazzling Gleam) vs Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
172.36 Atk for Runerigus (Dazzling Gleam) vs Runerigus (1v2)
171.71 Atk for Seismitoad (Dazzling Gleam) vs Seismitoad (1v1)

Anchors we get for free (17 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

134.99 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Snorlax bulk (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2 with bait)
134.78 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (2v2 with bait)
135.04 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (2v2 with bait)
134.80 Def + 153 HP for Dusknoir bulk (Poltergeist) vs Dusknoir (1v0, 2v2)
134.86 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
135.07 Def + 161 HP for Steelix bulk (Heavy Slam) vs Steelix (0v0)
134.99 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Steelix bulk (Crunch) vs Shadow Steelix (0v1, 2v2)
134.91 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Ampharos bulk (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 with bait)
135.03 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Talonflame bulk (Fly) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1, 2v1)
135.14 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Talonflame bulk (Fire Blast) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1, 2v1)
134.80 Def + 157 HP for Snorlax bulk (Superpower) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
134.99 Def + 157 HP for Snorlax bulk (Heavy Slam) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
134.85 Def + 158 HP for Registeel bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (2v0)
134.76 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Walrein bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
135.00 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
135.13 Def for Bellibolt bulk (Discharge) vs Bellibolt (1v2 with bait)
134.91 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (1v1 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

172.43 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [3840 IVs]
172.43 Atk + 149 HP flips Shadow Steelix (2v2) [3600 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Blastoise (2v1)

Member IVs (88)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/4/9 👑	186.55	137.95	156	#308	-19	-10.5	-29.3	-13.1
15/3/10 👑	186.55	137.25	157	#332	-21	-8.4	-33.4	-13.2
15/2/10	186.55	136.55	157	#408	-23	-9.7	-34.9	-14.8
15/5/8 👑	186.55	138.65	155	#445	+0	-12.2	-35.1	-13.1
15/0/12 👑	186.55	135.15	158	#518	-23	-14.7	-35.1	-12.2
15/1/10	186.55	135.85	157	#524	-27	-11.0	-36.0	-15.5
15/1/11	186.55	135.85	157	#525	-27	-11.0	-36.0	-15.5
15/4/8	186.55	137.95	155	#577	+0	-11.3	-35.5	-17.7
15/11/2 👑	186.55	142.85	150	#578	+0	-14.7	-30.3	-11.3
15/12/1 👑	186.55	143.55	149	#626	+0	-14.1	-34.5	-12.3
15/3/9	186.55	137.25	156	#640	-25	-11.7	-40.5	-15.3
15/10/3 👑	186.55	142.15	151	#646	+0	-12.6	-36.7	-13.2
15/9/4 👑	186.55	141.45	152	#711	+0	-13.4	-39.7	-17.3
15/6/7 👑	186.55	139.35	154	#759	+0	-13.9	-41.8	-16.1
15/2/9	186.55	136.55	156	#819	-26	-12.5	-42.0	-18.4
15/3/8	186.55	137.25	155	#840	+0	-11.7	-41.7	-19.7
15/10/2	186.55	142.15	150	#848	+0	-13.4	-35.9	-19.2
15/5/7	186.55	138.65	154	#853	+0	-14.3	-42.2	-18.5
15/11/1	186.55	142.85	149	#905	+0	-13.7	-37.6	-15.0
15/0/10	186.55	135.15	157	#926	-29	-16.3	-43.2	-15.5
15/0/11	186.55	135.15	157	#927	-29	-16.3	-43.2	-15.5
15/7/6 👑	186.55	140.05	153	#928	+0	-14.5	-42.4	-19.1
15/1/9	186.55	135.85	156	#938	-30	-13.1	-42.2	-22.9
15/9/3	186.55	141.45	151	#946	+0	-14.2	-41.2	-23.0
15/6/6	186.55	139.35	153	#973	+0	-14.7	-42.6	-19.5
15/4/7	186.55	137.95	154	#976	+0	-14.1	-42.1	-20.1
15/2/8	186.55	136.55	155	#978	+0	-12.5	-43.5	-21.1
15/8/4	186.55	140.75	152	#986	+0	-15.8	-42.4	-19.0
15/8/5	186.55	140.75	152	#987	+0	-15.8	-42.4	-19.0
15/5/6	186.55	138.65	153	#1042	+0	-15.1	-43.0	-20.2
15/3/7	186.55	137.25	154	#1058	+0	-14.4	-43.2	-21.5
15/7/4	186.55	140.05	152	#1059	+0	-16.4	-43.7	-19.8
15/7/5	186.55	140.05	152	#1060	+0	-16.4	-43.7	-19.8
15/1/8	186.55	135.85	155	#1087	+0	-13.3	-43.4	-25.4
15/4/6	186.55	137.95	153	#1132	+0	-15.4	-43.7	-23.1
15/9/2	186.55	141.45	150	#1133	+0	-17.1	-39.4	-27.9
15/8/3	186.55	140.75	151	#1134	+0	-14.8	-44.3	-24.1
15/10/1	186.55	142.15	149	#1140	+0	-15.6	-41.8	-19.6
15/6/4	186.55	139.35	152	#1166	+0	-14.7	-44.0	-27.0
15/6/5	186.55	139.35	152	#1167	+0	-14.7	-44.0	-27.0
15/2/7	186.55	136.55	154	#1175	+0	-15.3	-46.8	-22.5
15/0/9	186.55	135.15	156	#1186	-37	-17.3	-47.0	-24.0
15/3/6	186.55	137.25	153	#1205	+0	-15.9	-44.9	-24.5
15/7/3	186.55	140.05	151	#1208	+0	-15.6	-45.4	-25.0
15/5/4	186.55	138.65	152	#1261	+0	-16.9	-44.5	-31.0
15/5/5	186.55	138.65	152	#1262	+0	-16.9	-44.5	-31.0
15/1/7	186.55	135.85	154	#1298	+0	-18.1	-46.2	-27.9
15/6/3	186.55	139.35	151	#1304	+0	-16.0	-44.8	-30.9
15/2/6	186.55	136.55	153	#1335	+0	-17.0	-50.2	-25.4
15/8/2	186.55	140.75	150	#1367	+0	-18.7	-45.6	-29.3
… 38 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Melmetal Atk · atk≥185.96 (139 IV spreads) (−168 vs Muk (Alolan) Atk (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 57 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Clefable, Shadow Cradily, Cresselia, +23 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Melmetal (1 scenario flip).

181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Powder Snow) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Dazzling Gleam) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Chilling Water) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
173.53 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Dazzling Gleam) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1 with bait)
175.59 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Chilling Water) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1 with bait)
172.51 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
174.42 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
176.18 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
174.36 Atk for Rillaboom (Dazzling Gleam) vs Rillaboom (0v0, 2v2)
177.84 Atk for Rillaboom (Chilling Water) vs Rillaboom (0v0, 2v2)
172.12 Atk for Lapras (Chilling Water) vs Lapras (2v1)
172.89 Atk for Lapras (Dazzling Gleam) vs Lapras (2v1)
171.69 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0, 1v1, 2v1)
172.18 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0, 1v1, 2v1)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v1)
179.02 Atk for Dondozo (Dazzling Gleam) vs Dondozo (1v0)
173.03 Atk for Forretress (Chilling Water) vs Forretress (2v0)
178.37 Atk for Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Ninetales (2v1)
179.53 Atk for Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Ninetales (2v1)
174.15 Atk for Cresselia (Dazzling Gleam) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
175.33 Atk for Cresselia (Chilling Water) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
177.10 Atk for Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
185.37 Atk for Alolan Muk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Muk (2v1 with bait)
185.37 Atk for Alolan Muk (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Muk (2v1 with bait)
185.37 Atk for Alolan Muk (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Muk (2v1 with bait)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (2v1)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Powder Snow) vs Clefable (2v1)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Chilling Water) vs Clefable (2v1)
172.60 Atk for Walrein (Dazzling Gleam) vs Walrein (0v0)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Powder Snow) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Dazzling Gleam) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Chilling Water) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
181.04 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
172.79 Atk for Ampharos (Dazzling Gleam) vs Ampharos (2v2)
173.19 Atk for Ampharos (Chilling Water) vs Ampharos (2v2)
176.72 Atk for Ampharos (Powder Snow) vs Ampharos (2v2)
172.62 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
173.04 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
175.90 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
171.49 Atk for Virizion (Dazzling Gleam) vs Virizion (1v1 no bait)
185.06 Atk for Snorlax (Dazzling Gleam) vs Snorlax (2v1 no bait)
185.06 Atk for Snorlax (Chilling Water) vs Snorlax (2v1 no bait)
171.61 Atk for Guzzlord (Dazzling Gleam) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Powder Snow) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
173.18 Atk for Guzzlord (Chilling Water) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Powder Snow) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Dazzling Gleam) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Chilling Water) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
184.94 Atk for Miltank (Powder Snow) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
184.94 Atk for Miltank (Dazzling Gleam) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
185.96 Atk for Melmetal (Dazzling Gleam) vs Melmetal (2v0)
171.77 Atk for Feraligatr (Dazzling Gleam) vs Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
174.21 Atk for Dusknoir (Dazzling Gleam) vs Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
172.36 Atk for Runerigus (Dazzling Gleam) vs Runerigus (1v2)
171.71 Atk for Seismitoad (Dazzling Gleam) vs Seismitoad (1v1)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

172.43 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [3840 IVs]

Member IVs (139)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/4/9 👑	186.55	137.95	156	#308	-19	-10.5	-29.3	-13.1
15/3/10 👑	186.55	137.25	157	#332	-21	-8.4	-33.4	-13.2
15/1/14 👑	185.99	135.44	160	#356	-13	-11.6	-27.3	-13.5
15/2/13 👑	185.99	136.14	159	#398	-14	-7.1	-32.2	-15.8
15/2/10	186.55	136.55	157	#408	-23	-9.7	-34.9	-14.8
15/0/14	185.99	134.75	160	#410	-15	-12.5	-28.2	-12.8
15/0/15	185.99	134.75	160	#411	-15	-12.5	-28.2	-12.8
15/5/8 👑	186.55	138.65	155	#445	+0	-12.2	-35.1	-13.1
15/0/12 👑	186.55	135.15	158	#518	-23	-14.7	-35.1	-12.2
15/1/10	186.55	135.85	157	#524	-27	-11.0	-36.0	-15.5
15/1/11	186.55	135.85	157	#525	-27	-11.0	-36.0	-15.5
15/3/12 👑	185.99	136.84	158	#561	-21	-8.4	-37.1	-15.7
15/4/11 👑	185.99	137.54	157	#567	-21	-9.6	-33.1	-18.5
15/4/8	186.55	137.95	155	#577	+0	-11.3	-35.5	-17.7
15/11/2 👑	186.55	142.85	150	#578	+0	-14.7	-30.3	-11.3
15/14/0 👑	186.55	144.95	148	#585	+0	-14.2	-32.9	-13.4
15/5/10 👑	185.99	138.24	156	#610	-24	-10.3	-34.3	-18.8
15/12/1 👑	186.55	143.55	149	#626	+0	-14.1	-34.5	-12.3
15/3/9	186.55	137.25	156	#640	-25	-11.7	-40.5	-15.3
15/10/3 👑	186.55	142.15	151	#646	+0	-12.6	-36.7	-13.2
15/2/12	185.99	136.14	158	#647	-24	-9.4	-38.3	-18.0
15/1/13	185.99	135.44	159	#702	-22	-13.3	-37.1	-17.6
15/9/4 👑	186.55	141.45	152	#711	+0	-13.4	-39.7	-17.3
15/13/3 👑	185.99	143.82	150	#717	+0	-14.7	-30.3	-14.3
15/6/7 👑	186.55	139.35	154	#759	+0	-13.9	-41.8	-16.1
15/4/10	185.99	137.54	156	#762	-25	-12.0	-35.2	-20.7
15/6/9 👑	185.99	138.94	155	#775	+0	-12.8	-40.2	-19.0
15/2/9	186.55	136.55	156	#819	-26	-12.5	-42.0	-18.4
15/0/13	185.99	134.75	159	#822	-26	-14.3	-39.8	-16.8
15/15/1 👑	185.99	145.22	149	#828	+0	-11.8	-38.1	-16.7
15/3/11	185.99	136.84	157	#836	-26	-11.0	-40.0	-20.0
15/13/0	186.55	144.25	148	#837	+0	-15.2	-37.0	-15.8
15/3/8	186.55	137.25	155	#840	+0	-11.7	-41.7	-19.7
15/10/2	186.55	142.15	150	#848	+0	-13.4	-35.9	-19.2
15/5/7	186.55	138.65	154	#853	+0	-14.3	-42.2	-18.5
15/2/11	185.99	136.14	157	#892	-27	-11.4	-41.2	-21.6
15/11/1	186.55	142.85	149	#905	+0	-13.7	-37.6	-15.0
15/14/1	185.99	144.52	149	#908	+0	-13.2	-39.3	-17.2
15/14/2	185.99	144.52	149	#909	+0	-13.2	-39.3	-17.2
15/0/10	186.55	135.15	157	#926	-29	-16.3	-43.2	-15.5
15/0/11	186.55	135.15	157	#927	-29	-16.3	-43.2	-15.5
15/7/6 👑	186.55	140.05	153	#928	+0	-14.5	-42.4	-19.1
15/1/9	186.55	135.85	156	#938	-30	-13.1	-42.2	-22.9
15/11/4 👑	185.99	142.43	151	#939	+0	-13.2	-40.9	-12.7
15/9/3	186.55	141.45	151	#946	+0	-14.2	-41.2	-23.0
15/15/0	185.99	145.22	148	#950	+0	-14.6	-36.9	-19.2
15/1/12	185.99	135.44	158	#957	-27	-15.7	-40.0	-18.9
15/6/6	186.55	139.35	153	#973	+0	-14.7	-42.6	-19.5
15/4/7	186.55	137.95	154	#976	+0	-14.1	-42.1	-20.1
15/2/8	186.55	136.55	155	#978	+0	-12.5	-43.5	-21.1
… 89 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Muk (Alolan) Atk · atk≥185.37 (307 IV spreads)

Clears 54 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Clefable, Shadow Cradily, Cresselia, +22 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Muk (Alolan) (3 scenario flips).

181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Powder Snow) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Dazzling Gleam) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Chilling Water) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
173.53 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Dazzling Gleam) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1 with bait)
175.59 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Chilling Water) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1 with bait)
172.51 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
174.42 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
176.18 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
174.36 Atk for Rillaboom (Dazzling Gleam) vs Rillaboom (0v0, 2v2)
177.84 Atk for Rillaboom (Chilling Water) vs Rillaboom (0v0, 2v2)
172.12 Atk for Lapras (Chilling Water) vs Lapras (2v1)
172.89 Atk for Lapras (Dazzling Gleam) vs Lapras (2v1)
171.69 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0, 1v1, 2v1)
172.18 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0, 1v1, 2v1)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v1)
179.02 Atk for Dondozo (Dazzling Gleam) vs Dondozo (1v0)
173.03 Atk for Forretress (Chilling Water) vs Forretress (2v0)
178.37 Atk for Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Ninetales (2v1)
179.53 Atk for Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Ninetales (2v1)
174.15 Atk for Cresselia (Dazzling Gleam) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
175.33 Atk for Cresselia (Chilling Water) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
177.10 Atk for Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
185.37 Atk for Alolan Muk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Muk (2v1 with bait)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (2v1)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Powder Snow) vs Clefable (2v1)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Chilling Water) vs Clefable (2v1)
172.60 Atk for Walrein (Dazzling Gleam) vs Walrein (0v0)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Powder Snow) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Dazzling Gleam) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Chilling Water) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
181.04 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
172.79 Atk for Ampharos (Dazzling Gleam) vs Ampharos (2v2)
173.19 Atk for Ampharos (Chilling Water) vs Ampharos (2v2)
176.72 Atk for Ampharos (Powder Snow) vs Ampharos (2v2)
172.62 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
173.04 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
175.90 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
171.49 Atk for Virizion (Dazzling Gleam) vs Virizion (1v1 no bait)
185.06 Atk for Snorlax (Dazzling Gleam) vs Snorlax (2v1 no bait)
185.06 Atk for Snorlax (Chilling Water) vs Snorlax (2v1 no bait)
171.61 Atk for Guzzlord (Dazzling Gleam) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Powder Snow) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
173.18 Atk for Guzzlord (Chilling Water) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Powder Snow) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Dazzling Gleam) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Chilling Water) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
184.94 Atk for Miltank (Powder Snow) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
184.94 Atk for Miltank (Dazzling Gleam) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
171.77 Atk for Feraligatr (Dazzling Gleam) vs Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
174.21 Atk for Dusknoir (Dazzling Gleam) vs Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
172.36 Atk for Runerigus (Dazzling Gleam) vs Runerigus (1v2)
171.71 Atk for Seismitoad (Dazzling Gleam) vs Seismitoad (1v1)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

172.43 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [3840 IVs]
184.88 Atk flips Melmetal (2v0) [366 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Melmetal (2v0)

Member IVs (307)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/1/14 👑	185.54	135.85	160	#249	-12	-7.4	-25.9	-13.2
15/2/15	185.44	135.74	160	#256	-12	-7.5	-26.0	-12.7
15/4/9 👑	186.55	137.95	156	#308	-19	-10.5	-29.3	-13.1
15/3/10 👑	186.55	137.25	157	#332	-21	-8.4	-33.4	-13.2
15/1/14 👑	185.99	135.44	160	#356	-13	-11.6	-27.3	-13.5
14/5/10 👑	185.54	138.65	157	#363	-15	-8.7	-28.9	-15.5
15/6/11	185.44	138.52	157	#380	-17	-9.0	-29.1	-15.7
14/2/13 👑	185.54	136.55	159	#396	-15	-7.5	-32.3	-15.2
15/1/15	185.44	135.04	160	#397	-16	-12.7	-28.0	-13.8
15/2/13 👑	185.99	136.14	159	#398	-14	-7.1	-32.2	-15.8
14/0/14	185.54	135.15	160	#399	-16	-12.7	-28.3	-13.8
15/3/14	185.44	136.43	159	#403	-15	-7.6	-32.3	-15.6
15/2/10	186.55	136.55	157	#408	-23	-9.7	-34.9	-14.8
15/0/14	185.99	134.75	160	#410	-15	-12.5	-28.2	-12.8
15/0/15	185.99	134.75	160	#411	-15	-12.5	-28.2	-12.8
14/6/9 👑	185.54	139.35	156	#444	-18	-10.7	-29.9	-18.5
15/5/8 👑	186.55	138.65	155	#445	+0	-12.2	-35.1	-13.1
15/7/10	185.44	139.22	156	#455	-18	-10.9	-29.9	-17.7
15/14/4 👑	185.44	144.09	151	#456	+0	-11.0	-29.6	-8.9
14/3/12 👑	185.54	137.25	158	#460	-21	-7.5	-35.9	-14.4
14/14/2 👑	185.54	144.95	150	#481	+0	-11.3	-29.4	-11.9
14/5/9	185.54	138.65	156	#492	-21	-11.2	-31.9	-17.8
14/4/10	185.54	137.95	157	#498	-19	-9.1	-32.2	-16.9
14/4/11	185.54	137.95	157	#499	-19	-9.1	-32.2	-16.9
14/1/13	185.54	135.85	159	#503	-18	-8.7	-35.8	-16.2
15/0/12 👑	186.55	135.15	158	#518	-23	-14.7	-35.1	-12.2
15/2/14	185.44	135.74	159	#519	-20	-8.8	-35.9	-16.9
15/13/5 👑	185.44	143.39	152	#520	+0	-10.7	-31.0	-13.0
15/6/10	185.44	138.52	156	#523	-22	-11.3	-32.1	-17.9
15/1/10	186.55	135.85	157	#524	-27	-11.0	-36.0	-15.5
15/1/11	186.55	135.85	157	#525	-27	-11.0	-36.0	-15.5
15/15/3	185.44	144.79	150	#528	+0	-12.8	-29.5	-11.9
15/5/11	185.44	137.82	157	#542	-21	-9.9	-32.3	-17.4
15/5/12	185.44	137.82	157	#543	-21	-9.9	-32.3	-17.4
15/4/13	185.44	137.13	158	#551	-21	-8.2	-37.1	-15.4
15/3/12 👑	185.99	136.84	158	#561	-21	-8.4	-37.1	-15.7
15/4/11 👑	185.99	137.54	157	#567	-21	-9.6	-33.1	-18.5
15/4/8	186.55	137.95	155	#577	+0	-11.3	-35.5	-17.7
15/11/2 👑	186.55	142.85	150	#578	+0	-14.7	-30.3	-11.3
14/13/2	185.54	144.25	150	#583	+0	-12.9	-30.1	-12.5
15/14/0 👑	186.55	144.95	148	#585	+0	-14.2	-32.9	-13.4
14/12/3 👑	185.54	143.55	151	#588	+0	-12.5	-29.5	-10.0
15/14/3	185.44	144.09	150	#590	+0	-13.0	-30.3	-12.5
14/7/8 👑	185.54	140.05	155	#606	+0	-11.9	-33.1	-19.7
15/5/10 👑	185.99	138.24	156	#610	-24	-10.3	-34.3	-18.8
14/2/12	185.54	136.55	158	#613	-24	-8.8	-37.2	-17.8
15/3/13	185.44	136.43	158	#624	-24	-8.9	-37.3	-17.9
15/12/1 👑	186.55	143.55	149	#626	+0	-14.1	-34.5	-12.3
15/8/9	185.44	139.91	155	#636	+0	-12.1	-34.0	-19.8
15/3/9	186.55	137.25	156	#640	-25	-11.7	-40.5	-15.3
… 257 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Snorlax Atk · atk≥185.06 (307 IV spreads)

Clears 52 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Clefable, Shadow Cradily, Cresselia, +21 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Snorlax (2 scenario flips).

181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Powder Snow) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Dazzling Gleam) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Chilling Water) vs Tinkaton (2v0)
173.53 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Dazzling Gleam) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1 with bait)
175.59 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Chilling Water) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1 with bait)
172.51 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
174.42 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
176.18 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v1, 2v1)
174.36 Atk for Rillaboom (Dazzling Gleam) vs Rillaboom (0v0, 2v2)
177.84 Atk for Rillaboom (Chilling Water) vs Rillaboom (0v0, 2v2)
172.12 Atk for Lapras (Chilling Water) vs Lapras (2v1)
172.89 Atk for Lapras (Dazzling Gleam) vs Lapras (2v1)
171.69 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0, 1v1, 2v1)
172.18 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0, 1v1, 2v1)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v1, 2v1)
179.02 Atk for Dondozo (Dazzling Gleam) vs Dondozo (1v0)
173.03 Atk for Forretress (Chilling Water) vs Forretress (2v0)
178.37 Atk for Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Ninetales (2v1)
179.53 Atk for Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Ninetales (2v1)
174.15 Atk for Cresselia (Dazzling Gleam) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
175.33 Atk for Cresselia (Chilling Water) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
177.10 Atk for Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Cresselia (1v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (2v1)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Powder Snow) vs Clefable (2v1)
184.66 Atk for Clefable (Chilling Water) vs Clefable (2v1)
172.60 Atk for Walrein (Dazzling Gleam) vs Walrein (0v0)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Powder Snow) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Dazzling Gleam) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
184.76 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Chilling Water) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v0, 1v2)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
181.04 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2 with bait)
172.79 Atk for Ampharos (Dazzling Gleam) vs Ampharos (2v2)
173.19 Atk for Ampharos (Chilling Water) vs Ampharos (2v2)
176.72 Atk for Ampharos (Powder Snow) vs Ampharos (2v2)
172.62 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
173.04 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
175.90 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cradily (1v1 with bait)
171.49 Atk for Virizion (Dazzling Gleam) vs Virizion (1v1 no bait)
185.06 Atk for Snorlax (Dazzling Gleam) vs Snorlax (2v1 no bait)
171.61 Atk for Guzzlord (Dazzling Gleam) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Powder Snow) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
173.18 Atk for Guzzlord (Chilling Water) vs Guzzlord (1v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Powder Snow) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Dazzling Gleam) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Chilling Water) vs Swampert (1v1, 2v2 no bait)
184.94 Atk for Miltank (Powder Snow) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
184.94 Atk for Miltank (Dazzling Gleam) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
171.77 Atk for Feraligatr (Dazzling Gleam) vs Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
174.21 Atk for Dusknoir (Dazzling Gleam) vs Dusknoir (1v1, 2v1)
172.36 Atk for Runerigus (Dazzling Gleam) vs Runerigus (1v2)
171.71 Atk for Seismitoad (Dazzling Gleam) vs Seismitoad (1v1)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

172.43 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1) [3840 IVs]
184.88 Atk flips Alolan Muk (2v1 with bait) [366 IVs]
184.88 Atk flips Melmetal (2v0) [366 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Melmetal (2v0)
vs Alolan Muk (2v1)

Member IVs (307)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/1/14 👑	185.54	135.85	160	#249	-12	-7.4	-25.9	-13.2
15/2/15	185.44	135.74	160	#256	-12	-7.5	-26.0	-12.7
15/4/9 👑	186.55	137.95	156	#308	-19	-10.5	-29.3	-13.1
15/3/10 👑	186.55	137.25	157	#332	-21	-8.4	-33.4	-13.2
15/1/14 👑	185.99	135.44	160	#356	-13	-11.6	-27.3	-13.5
14/5/10 👑	185.54	138.65	157	#363	-15	-8.7	-28.9	-15.5
15/6/11	185.44	138.52	157	#380	-17	-9.0	-29.1	-15.7
14/2/13 👑	185.54	136.55	159	#396	-15	-7.5	-32.3	-15.2
15/1/15	185.44	135.04	160	#397	-16	-12.7	-28.0	-13.8
15/2/13 👑	185.99	136.14	159	#398	-14	-7.1	-32.2	-15.8
14/0/14	185.54	135.15	160	#399	-16	-12.7	-28.3	-13.8
15/3/14	185.44	136.43	159	#403	-15	-7.6	-32.3	-15.6
15/2/10	186.55	136.55	157	#408	-23	-9.7	-34.9	-14.8
15/0/14	185.99	134.75	160	#410	-15	-12.5	-28.2	-12.8
15/0/15	185.99	134.75	160	#411	-15	-12.5	-28.2	-12.8
14/6/9 👑	185.54	139.35	156	#444	-18	-10.7	-29.9	-18.5
15/5/8 👑	186.55	138.65	155	#445	+0	-12.2	-35.1	-13.1
15/7/10	185.44	139.22	156	#455	-18	-10.9	-29.9	-17.7
15/14/4 👑	185.44	144.09	151	#456	+0	-11.0	-29.6	-8.9
14/3/12 👑	185.54	137.25	158	#460	-21	-7.5	-35.9	-14.4
14/14/2 👑	185.54	144.95	150	#481	+0	-11.3	-29.4	-11.9
14/5/9	185.54	138.65	156	#492	-21	-11.2	-31.9	-17.8
14/4/10	185.54	137.95	157	#498	-19	-9.1	-32.2	-16.9
14/4/11	185.54	137.95	157	#499	-19	-9.1	-32.2	-16.9
14/1/13	185.54	135.85	159	#503	-18	-8.7	-35.8	-16.2
15/0/12 👑	186.55	135.15	158	#518	-23	-14.7	-35.1	-12.2
15/2/14	185.44	135.74	159	#519	-20	-8.8	-35.9	-16.9
15/13/5 👑	185.44	143.39	152	#520	+0	-10.7	-31.0	-13.0
15/6/10	185.44	138.52	156	#523	-22	-11.3	-32.1	-17.9
15/1/10	186.55	135.85	157	#524	-27	-11.0	-36.0	-15.5
15/1/11	186.55	135.85	157	#525	-27	-11.0	-36.0	-15.5
15/15/3	185.44	144.79	150	#528	+0	-12.8	-29.5	-11.9
15/5/11	185.44	137.82	157	#542	-21	-9.9	-32.3	-17.4
15/5/12	185.44	137.82	157	#543	-21	-9.9	-32.3	-17.4
15/4/13	185.44	137.13	158	#551	-21	-8.2	-37.1	-15.4
15/3/12 👑	185.99	136.84	158	#561	-21	-8.4	-37.1	-15.7
15/4/11 👑	185.99	137.54	157	#567	-21	-9.6	-33.1	-18.5
15/4/8	186.55	137.95	155	#577	+0	-11.3	-35.5	-17.7
15/11/2 👑	186.55	142.85	150	#578	+0	-14.7	-30.3	-11.3
14/13/2	185.54	144.25	150	#583	+0	-12.9	-30.1	-12.5
15/14/0 👑	186.55	144.95	148	#585	+0	-14.2	-32.9	-13.4
14/12/3 👑	185.54	143.55	151	#588	+0	-12.5	-29.5	-10.0
15/14/3	185.44	144.09	150	#590	+0	-13.0	-30.3	-12.5
14/7/8 👑	185.54	140.05	155	#606	+0	-11.9	-33.1	-19.7
15/5/10 👑	185.99	138.24	156	#610	-24	-10.3	-34.3	-18.8
14/2/12	185.54	136.55	158	#613	-24	-8.8	-37.2	-17.8
15/3/13	185.44	136.43	158	#624	-24	-8.9	-37.3	-17.9
15/12/1 👑	186.55	143.55	149	#626	+0	-14.1	-34.5	-12.3
15/8/9	185.44	139.91	155	#636	+0	-12.1	-34.0	-19.8
15/3/9	186.55	137.25	156	#640	-25	-11.7	-40.5	-15.3
… 257 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

General · atk≥171.49, def≥134.76 (3836 IV spreads)

Clears 2 anchors across 2 shield scenarios, covering Virizion, Shadow Walrein. Floor across 29 atk breakpoint opponents + 37 bulkpoint opponents. Clears the easiest anchor for every opponent.

171.49 Atk for Virizion (Dazzling Gleam) vs Virizion (1v1 no bait)
134.76 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Walrein bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Dusknoir (2v1)
vs Feraligatr (2v2)
vs Forretress (2v0)
vs Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1)
vs Guzzlord (1v2)
vs Lapras (2v1)
vs Alolan Ninetales (1v0)
vs Runerigus (1v2)
vs Seismitoad (1v1)
vs Walrein (0v0)

Member IVs (3836)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
7/15/15 👑	178.48	145.65	161	#1	+5	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
8/13/15 👑	179.49	144.25	161	#2	+2	-3.9	-1.2	-2.6
9/14/14 👑	179.96	144.52	160	#3	+1	-2.3	-5.3	-2.9
6/15/15	177.47	145.65	161	#4	+5	-1.0	-4.4	+0.7
7/14/15	178.48	144.95	161	#5	+0	-2.6	-1.0	-2.5
7/15/14	178.48	145.65	160	#6	-1	-2.7	-2.8	-3.4
8/15/14 👑	178.95	145.22	160	#7	+0	-3.7	-2.7	-5.0
8/15/15 👑	178.95	145.22	160	#8	+0	-3.7	-2.7	-5.0
8/14/14 👑	179.49	144.95	160	#9	+0	-4.3	-5.0	-5.1
7/13/15	178.48	144.25	161	#10	-3	-2.9	-3.2	-4.9
9/15/15	179.42	144.79	160	#11	-1	-4.6	-5.4	-5.1
6/14/15	177.47	144.95	161	#12	+0	-3.6	-6.9	-1.8
6/15/14	177.47	145.65	160	#13	-1	-3.7	-7.1	-2.9
9/13/14	179.96	143.82	160	#14	-1	-2.6	-11.8	-4.1
9/13/15	179.96	143.82	160	#15	-1	-2.6	-11.8	-4.1
8/12/15	179.49	143.55	161	#16	-2	-4.6	-7.6	-5.0
8/13/14	179.49	144.25	160	#17	-4	-5.1	-9.6	-5.9
6/13/15	177.47	144.25	161	#18	-3	-3.9	-9.2	-4.2
8/14/15	178.95	144.52	160	#19	-7	-4.6	-7.2	-5.5
9/14/15	179.42	144.09	160	#20	-4	-5.2	-10.0	-6.0
7/14/14	178.48	144.95	160	#21	-6	-3.2	-6.9	-7.4
9/15/13 👑	179.96	145.22	159	#22	+8	-3.1	-12.3	-4.9
8/15/13 👑	179.49	145.65	159	#23	+6	-4.5	-11.8	-3.5
13/15/14 👑	181.78	143.49	158	#24	+0	-4.2	-15.1	-2.0
11/13/11 👑	181.97	143.82	157	#25	+1	-2.5	-16.1	-1.7
12/12/14 👑	181.88	142.27	159	#26	-5	-3.2	-17.6	-8.4
10/13/15 👑	180.42	143.39	160	#27	-1	-3.7	-14.1	-8.0
12/14/12	181.88	143.66	157	#28	-1	-2.6	-16.9	-2.0
10/13/13 👑	180.96	143.82	159	#29	-1	-3.3	-14.8	-7.4
9/13/13 👑	180.50	144.25	159	#30	-1	-3.4	-15.1	-7.3
10/14/14	180.42	144.09	159	#31	-2	-3.6	-15.2	-7.4
7/12/15	178.48	143.55	161	#32	-7	-3.4	-9.5	-7.4
6/14/14	177.47	144.95	160	#33	-6	-4.3	-12.9	-6.9
9/15/10 👑	180.50	145.65	157	#34	+5	-3.8	-18.4	-2.1
9/15/11 👑	180.50	145.65	157	#35	+5	-3.8	-18.4	-2.1
11/15/15	180.34	143.92	159	#36	-2	-3.7	-15.4	-7.8
10/14/10 👑	181.50	144.95	157	#37	+6	-5.7	-14.6	-4.5
7/13/14	178.48	144.25	160	#38	-9	-4.0	-11.6	-8.3
9/14/13	179.96	144.52	159	#39	+1	-4.3	-14.7	-7.2
10/15/14	179.88	144.35	159	#40	-1	-4.6	-14.8	-7.3
10/15/15	179.88	144.35	159	#41	-1	-4.6	-14.8	-7.3
10/12/14 👑	180.96	143.12	160	#42	-2	-3.7	-14.2	-10.6
12/15/14 👑	181.34	143.92	158	#43	+2	-5.2	-14.0	-7.4
11/12/12 👑	181.97	143.12	158	#44	-2	-4.9	-16.8	-7.0
8/12/14	179.49	143.55	160	#45	-5	-5.9	-13.7	-6.8
11/14/14	180.88	143.66	159	#46	-3	-3.5	-16.4	-7.6
9/14/12 👑	180.50	144.95	158	#47	+2	-4.7	-16.7	-6.7
11/15/11	181.43	144.79	157	#48	+5	-4.0	-15.0	-4.8
5/15/15	176.46	145.65	161	#49	-7	-8.6	-9.8	-4.0
10/15/9 👑	181.50	145.65	156	#50	+6	-5.4	-15.5	-0.7
… 3786 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) Mirror Bulk · def≥140.23, hp≥148 (2009 IV spreads)

Clears 152 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Bellibolt, Blastoise, +27 more. Mirror bulkpoint: passing cohort wins 5 of 9 scenarios vs rank-1 SP Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (2009 IVs pass).

134.99 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (2v2 with bait)
135.18 Def + 154 HP for Virizion (Leaf Blade) vs Virizion (0v1, 1v2)
135.64 Def + 155 HP for Virizion (Stone Edge) vs Virizion (0v1, 1v2)
135.64 Def + 155 HP for Virizion (Close Combat) vs Virizion (0v1, 1v2)
136.73 Def + 155 HP for Virizion (Sacred Sword) vs Virizion (0v1, 1v2 with bait)
134.78 Def + 160 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (2v2 with bait)
135.04 Def + 159 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (2v2 with bait)
135.36 Def + 159 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (2v2 with bait)
134.80 Def + 151 HP for Snorlax (Superpower) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
134.99 Def + 152 HP for Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
135.59 Def + 153 HP for Snorlax (Lick) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
135.59 Def + 153 HP for Snorlax (Psywave) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
135.59 Def + 153 HP for Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
135.59 Def + 153 HP for Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
135.59 Def + 151 HP for Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
135.59 Def + 151 HP for Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
138.72 Def + 155 HP for Snorlax (Outrage) vs Snorlax (2v1, 2v2)
135.17 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Moonblast) vs Florges (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
135.59 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Trailblaze) vs Florges (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
135.66 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
135.98 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
136.54 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Psychic) vs Florges (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
136.54 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Chilling Water) vs Florges (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
135.44 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
135.44 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
135.79 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
136.57 Def + 158 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Waterfall) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
136.93 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
135.75 Def + 157 HP for Jellicent (Surf) vs Jellicent (2v1)
136.12 Def + 156 HP for Jellicent (Shadow Ball) vs Jellicent (2v1)
136.20 Def + 156 HP for Jellicent (Ice Beam) vs Jellicent (2v1)
138.01 Def + 157 HP for Jellicent (Bubble Beam) vs Jellicent (2v1)
135.47 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Lapras (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0)
135.58 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0)
135.66 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0)
135.86 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0)
135.86 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0)
136.08 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0)
136.31 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Lapras (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0)
137.17 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Lapras (Frost Breath) vs Shadow Lapras (1v0)
134.80 Def + 151 HP for Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Dusknoir (1v0, 2v2)
135.82 Def + 153 HP for Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Dusknoir (2v2 with bait)
135.82 Def + 153 HP for Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Dusknoir (2v2 with bait)
136.17 Def + 152 HP for Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Dusknoir (2v2 with bait)
136.95 Def + 151 HP for Dusknoir (Shadow Punch) vs Dusknoir (2v2 with bait)
135.31 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v2)
135.82 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v2)
135.82 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v2)
135.88 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v2)
136.01 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Shadow Punch) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v2)
136.17 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v2)
137.32 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Ominous Wind) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1, 2v2)
134.85 Def + 158 HP for Registeel (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (2v0)
136.04 Def + 158 HP for Registeel (Hyper Beam) vs Registeel (2v0)
136.04 Def + 158 HP for Registeel (Zap Cannon) vs Registeel (2v0)
136.04 Def + 158 HP for Registeel (Focus Blast) vs Registeel (2v0)
136.21 Def + 161 HP for Registeel (Metal Claw) vs Registeel (2v0)
135.80 Def + 154 HP for Blastoise (Flash Cannon) vs Blastoise (0v0)
136.08 Def + 157 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (0v0)
136.40 Def + 156 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (0v0)
136.66 Def + 156 HP for Blastoise (Skull Bash) vs Blastoise (0v0)
138.49 Def + 157 HP for Blastoise (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (0v0)
134.86 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
135.18 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
135.59 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
135.76 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
136.34 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
136.34 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
135.20 Def + 157 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (2v1)
135.42 Def + 157 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (2v1)
135.47 Def + 157 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (2v1)
136.04 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (2v1)
138.66 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk (Acid Spray) vs Alolan Muk (2v1)
138.68 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (2v1)
137.32 Def + 159 HP for Shadow Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Forretress (1v0)
138.10 Def + 159 HP for Shadow Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Shadow Forretress (1v0)
138.14 Def + 159 HP for Shadow Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (1v0)
138.40 Def + 159 HP for Shadow Forretress (Earthquake) vs Shadow Forretress (1v0)
138.40 Def + 159 HP for Shadow Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (1v0)
135.07 Def + 158 HP for Steelix (Heavy Slam) vs Steelix (0v0)
136.19 Def + 158 HP for Steelix (Earthquake) vs Steelix (0v0)
137.13 Def + 159 HP for Steelix (Psychic Fangs) vs Steelix (0v0)
138.45 Def + 158 HP for Steelix (Crunch) vs Steelix (0v0)
138.37 Def + 154 HP for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (1v2 with bait)
138.99 Def + 154 HP for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (1v2 with bait)
138.99 Def + 154 HP for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (1v2 with bait)
135.00 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
135.88 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
135.88 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
135.88 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 2v2 with bait)
134.99 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Steelix (Crunch) vs Shadow Steelix (0v1, 2v2)
135.24 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Steelix (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Steelix (2v2)
135.41 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Steelix (Earthquake) vs Shadow Steelix (2v2)
135.24 Def + 152 HP for Toucannon (Flash Cannon) vs Toucannon (1v1)
135.60 Def + 152 HP for Toucannon (Rock Blast) vs Toucannon (1v1)
135.85 Def + 152 HP for Toucannon (Beak Blast) vs Toucannon (1v1)
136.37 Def + 153 HP for Toucannon (Drill Peck) vs Toucannon (1v1)
138.32 Def + 153 HP for Toucannon (Peck) vs Toucannon (1v1)
138.78 Def + 161 HP for Primarina (Hydro Cannon) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
138.78 Def + 161 HP for Primarina (Sparkling Aria) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
139.34 Def + 161 HP for Primarina (Hydro Pump) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
139.59 Def + 161 HP for Primarina (Moonblast) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
139.66 Def + 161 HP for Primarina (Psychic) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
139.83 Def + 161 HP for Primarina (Disarming Voice) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
134.91 Def + 155 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 with bait)
135.23 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 with bait)
135.23 Def + 155 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 with bait)
135.63 Def + 155 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 with bait)
135.70 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 with bait)
136.06 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 with bait)
136.09 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 with bait)
137.19 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v1 with bait)
135.03 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Fly) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1, 2v1)
135.14 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Fire Blast) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1, 2v1)
135.45 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Hurricane) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1, 2v1)
135.62 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1, 2v1)
135.86 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Flame Charge) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1, 2v1)
137.35 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Incinerate) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1, 2v1)
139.16 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Talonflame (Fire Spin) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1, 2v1)
135.26 Def + 158 HP for Regidrago (Vise Grip) vs Regidrago (0v1, 0v2)
135.78 Def + 154 HP for Regidrago (Hyper Beam) vs Regidrago (0v1, 0v2)
138.53 Def + 156 HP for Regidrago (Breaking Swipe) vs Regidrago (0v1, 0v2)
140.03 Def + 154 HP for Regidrago (Outrage) vs Regidrago (0v2)
134.91 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
135.27 Def + 150 HP for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
135.29 Def + 150 HP for Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
135.50 Def + 151 HP for Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
135.64 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
135.87 Def + 150 HP for Ampharos (Thunder) vs Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
136.84 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
137.54 Def for Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
138.58 Def + 149 HP for Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Ampharos (1v1 no bait)
140.08 Def + 156 HP for Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Corviknight (2v0)
140.22 Def + 156 HP for Corviknight (Air Cutter) vs Corviknight (2v0)
135.19 Def + 155 HP for Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Cresselia (1v0)
135.19 Def + 155 HP for Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Cresselia (1v0)
135.66 Def + 154 HP for Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Cresselia (1v0)
136.33 Def + 156 HP for Cresselia (Confusion) vs Cresselia (1v0)
139.48 Def + 154 HP for Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Cresselia (1v0)
138.32 Def for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (2v1)
138.63 Def for Walrein (Waterfall) vs Walrein (2v1)
139.60 Def for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (2v1)
139.78 Def for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (2v1)
134.76 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
135.33 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
135.33 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
136.11 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Walrein (Waterfall) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
136.11 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
135.13 Def for Bellibolt (Discharge) vs Bellibolt (1v2 with bait)
139.05 Def + 157 HP for Miltank (Stomp) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
139.40 Def + 156 HP for Miltank (Gyro Ball) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)
139.71 Def + 156 HP for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (2v1 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

140.19 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (1v0) [2018 IVs]
137.41 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (1v0) [3065 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Bug Bite) (1v0)

Member IVs (2009)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
7/15/15 👑	178.48	145.65	161	#1	+5	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
8/13/15 👑	179.49	144.25	161	#2	+2	-3.9	-1.2	-2.6
9/14/14 👑	179.96	144.52	160	#3	+1	-2.3	-5.3	-2.9
6/15/15	177.47	145.65	161	#4	+5	-1.0	-4.4	+0.7
7/14/15	178.48	144.95	161	#5	+0	-2.6	-1.0	-2.5
7/15/14	178.48	145.65	160	#6	-1	-2.7	-2.8	-3.4
8/15/14 👑	178.95	145.22	160	#7	+0	-3.7	-2.7	-5.0
8/15/15 👑	178.95	145.22	160	#8	+0	-3.7	-2.7	-5.0
8/14/14 👑	179.49	144.95	160	#9	+0	-4.3	-5.0	-5.1
7/13/15	178.48	144.25	161	#10	-3	-2.9	-3.2	-4.9
9/15/15	179.42	144.79	160	#11	-1	-4.6	-5.4	-5.1
6/14/15	177.47	144.95	161	#12	+0	-3.6	-6.9	-1.8
6/15/14	177.47	145.65	160	#13	-1	-3.7	-7.1	-2.9
9/13/14	179.96	143.82	160	#14	-1	-2.6	-11.8	-4.1
9/13/15	179.96	143.82	160	#15	-1	-2.6	-11.8	-4.1
8/12/15	179.49	143.55	161	#16	-2	-4.6	-7.6	-5.0
8/13/14	179.49	144.25	160	#17	-4	-5.1	-9.6	-5.9
6/13/15	177.47	144.25	161	#18	-3	-3.9	-9.2	-4.2
8/14/15	178.95	144.52	160	#19	-7	-4.6	-7.2	-5.5
9/14/15	179.42	144.09	160	#20	-4	-5.2	-10.0	-6.0
7/14/14	178.48	144.95	160	#21	-6	-3.2	-6.9	-7.4
9/15/13 👑	179.96	145.22	159	#22	+8	-3.1	-12.3	-4.9
8/15/13 👑	179.49	145.65	159	#23	+6	-4.5	-11.8	-3.5
13/15/14 👑	181.78	143.49	158	#24	+0	-4.2	-15.1	-2.0
11/13/11 👑	181.97	143.82	157	#25	+1	-2.5	-16.1	-1.7
12/12/14 👑	181.88	142.27	159	#26	-5	-3.2	-17.6	-8.4
10/13/15 👑	180.42	143.39	160	#27	-1	-3.7	-14.1	-8.0
12/14/12	181.88	143.66	157	#28	-1	-2.6	-16.9	-2.0
10/13/13 👑	180.96	143.82	159	#29	-1	-3.3	-14.8	-7.4
9/13/13 👑	180.50	144.25	159	#30	-1	-3.4	-15.1	-7.3
10/14/14	180.42	144.09	159	#31	-2	-3.6	-15.2	-7.4
7/12/15	178.48	143.55	161	#32	-7	-3.4	-9.5	-7.4
6/14/14	177.47	144.95	160	#33	-6	-4.3	-12.9	-6.9
9/15/10 👑	180.50	145.65	157	#34	+5	-3.8	-18.4	-2.1
9/15/11 👑	180.50	145.65	157	#35	+5	-3.8	-18.4	-2.1
11/15/15	180.34	143.92	159	#36	-2	-3.7	-15.4	-7.8
10/14/10 👑	181.50	144.95	157	#37	+6	-5.7	-14.6	-4.5
7/13/14	178.48	144.25	160	#38	-9	-4.0	-11.6	-8.3
9/14/13	179.96	144.52	159	#39	+1	-4.3	-14.7	-7.2
10/15/14	179.88	144.35	159	#40	-1	-4.6	-14.8	-7.3
10/15/15	179.88	144.35	159	#41	-1	-4.6	-14.8	-7.3
10/12/14 👑	180.96	143.12	160	#42	-2	-3.7	-14.2	-10.6
12/15/14 👑	181.34	143.92	158	#43	+2	-5.2	-14.0	-7.4
11/12/12 👑	181.97	143.12	158	#44	-2	-4.9	-16.8	-7.0
8/12/14	179.49	143.55	160	#45	-5	-5.9	-13.7	-6.8
11/14/14	180.88	143.66	159	#46	-3	-3.5	-16.4	-7.6
9/14/12 👑	180.50	144.95	158	#47	+2	-4.7	-16.7	-6.7
11/15/11	181.43	144.79	157	#48	+5	-4.0	-15.0	-4.8
5/15/15	176.46	145.65	161	#49	-7	-8.6	-9.8	-4.0
10/15/9 👑	181.50	145.65	156	#50	+6	-5.4	-15.5	-0.7
… 1959 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Per-matchup IV finder (190 specific matchups - e.g. "which IV beats a given opponent in a given shield?")

Collapsed by default. This is a per-(opponent, shield) lookup: each card is one matchup and the exact IV spreads that win it. For "what do I need vs threat X" use Threats where your build choice matters above, or paste your collection into the scatter. Composite cards (slayer ∩ tier) surface IVs that satisfy a slayer anchor and a stat-cutoff tier; pure slayer-archetype cards live in the Slayer Builds block below, pure tier cards in the Threshold Tiers above.

Show only notable categories (≤ 5% of cohort or ≤ 5 members). Uncheck to see every non-trivial intersection.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) Mirror Bulk (7 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) Mirror Bulk · def≥140.234, hp≥148

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +2.8, spread 0.9)

15/9/4 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 141.45, hp 152, SP #873

One of 7 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) Mirror Bulk threshold (def≥140.234, hp≥148). Trades mirror dominance (89/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) Mirror Bulk cutoff.

15/10/2 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 142.15, hp 150, SP #1179

15/10/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 142.15, hp 151, SP #939

15/11/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 142.85, hp 150, SP #1007

15/12/1 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 143.55, hp 149, SP #1073

15/13/0 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 144.25, hp 148, SP #1139

15/14/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 144.95, hp 148, SP #960

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Blastoise Slayer (18 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Blastoise Slayer · atk≥186.207, hp≥149

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +3.9, spread 1.4)

15/2/10 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 136.55, hp 157, SP #987

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Blastoise Slayer threshold (atk≥186.207, hp≥149). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (124/124) AND clears the Blastoise Slayer cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/3/10 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.25, hp 157, SP #776

15/5/8 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 138.65, hp 155, SP #889

15/4/9 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.95, hp 156, SP #835

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Blastoise Slayer threshold (atk≥186.207, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (120/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Blastoise Slayer cutoff.

15/4/8 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.95, hp 155, SP #1084

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Blastoise Slayer threshold (atk≥186.207, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (110/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Blastoise Slayer cutoff.

15/1/10 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 135.85, hp 157, SP #1173

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Blastoise Slayer threshold (atk≥186.207, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (104/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Blastoise Slayer cutoff.

15/1/11 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 135.85, hp 157, SP #1172

15/5/7 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 138.65, hp 154, SP #1133

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Blastoise Slayer threshold (atk≥186.207, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (100/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Blastoise Slayer cutoff.

15/6/7 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 139.35, hp 154, SP #944

15/2/9 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 136.55, hp 156, SP #1212

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Blastoise Slayer threshold (atk≥186.207, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (99/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Blastoise Slayer cutoff.

15/3/9 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.25, hp 156, SP #1033

15/0/12 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 135.15, hp 158, SP #1130

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Blastoise Slayer threshold (atk≥186.207, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (89/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Blastoise Slayer cutoff.

15/3/8 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.25, hp 155, SP #1255

15/9/4 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 141.45, hp 152, SP #873

15/10/2 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 142.15, hp 150, SP #1179

15/10/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 142.15, hp 151, SP #939

15/11/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 142.85, hp 150, SP #1007

15/12/1 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 143.55, hp 149, SP #1073

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Seaking Slayer (18 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Seaking Slayer · atk≥186.159, hp≥149

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +3.9, spread 1.4)

15/2/10 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 136.55, hp 157, SP #987

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Seaking Slayer threshold (atk≥186.159, hp≥149). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (124/124) AND clears the Seaking Slayer cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/3/10 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.25, hp 157, SP #776

15/5/8 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 138.65, hp 155, SP #889

15/4/9 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.95, hp 156, SP #835

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Seaking Slayer threshold (atk≥186.159, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (120/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Seaking Slayer cutoff.

15/4/8 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.95, hp 155, SP #1084

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Seaking Slayer threshold (atk≥186.159, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (110/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Seaking Slayer cutoff.

15/1/10 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 135.85, hp 157, SP #1173

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Seaking Slayer threshold (atk≥186.159, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (104/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Seaking Slayer cutoff.

15/1/11 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 135.85, hp 157, SP #1172

15/5/7 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 138.65, hp 154, SP #1133

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Seaking Slayer threshold (atk≥186.159, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (100/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Seaking Slayer cutoff.

15/6/7 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 139.35, hp 154, SP #944

15/2/9 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 136.55, hp 156, SP #1212

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Seaking Slayer threshold (atk≥186.159, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (99/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Seaking Slayer cutoff.

15/3/9 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.25, hp 156, SP #1033

15/0/12 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 135.15, hp 158, SP #1130

One of 18 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Seaking Slayer threshold (atk≥186.159, hp≥149). Trades mirror dominance (89/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Seaking Slayer cutoff.

15/3/8 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.25, hp 155, SP #1255

15/9/4 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 141.45, hp 152, SP #873

15/10/2 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 142.15, hp 150, SP #1179

15/10/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 142.15, hp 151, SP #939

15/11/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 142.85, hp 150, SP #1007

15/12/1 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 143.55, hp 149, SP #1073

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Melmetal Atk (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Melmetal Atk · atk≥185.962

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +3.8, spread 1.4)

15/2/10 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 136.55, hp 157, SP #987

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Atk threshold (atk≥185.962). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (124/124) AND clears the Melmetal Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/3/10 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.25, hp 157, SP #776

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Atk threshold (atk≥185.962). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (124/124) AND clears the Melmetal Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/5/8 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 138.65, hp 155, SP #889

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Atk threshold (atk≥185.962). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (124/124) AND clears the Melmetal Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/4/9 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.95, hp 156, SP #835

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Atk threshold (atk≥185.962). Trades mirror dominance (120/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Melmetal Atk cutoff.

15/4/8 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.95, hp 155, SP #1084

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Atk threshold (atk≥185.962). Trades mirror dominance (110/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Melmetal Atk cutoff.

15/1/10 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 135.85, hp 157, SP #1173

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Atk threshold (atk≥185.962). Trades mirror dominance (104/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Melmetal Atk cutoff.

15/1/11 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 135.85, hp 157, SP #1172

15/5/7 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 138.65, hp 154, SP #1133

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Atk threshold (atk≥185.962). Trades mirror dominance (100/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Melmetal Atk cutoff.

15/6/7 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 139.35, hp 154, SP #944

15/2/9 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 136.55, hp 156, SP #1212

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Atk threshold (atk≥185.962). Trades mirror dominance (99/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Melmetal Atk cutoff.

15/3/9 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 137.25, hp 156, SP #1033

15/0/12 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 186.55, def 135.15, hp 158, SP #1130

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Melmetal Atk threshold (atk≥185.962). Trades mirror dominance (89/124 wins, vs 124/124 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Melmetal Atk cutoff.