Shadow Empoleon Ultra League IV Dive

Opponent list (63 mons)

Tinkaton, Corviknight, Snorlax (Shadow), Corviknight (Shadow), Melmetal, Virizion, Zygarde (Complete Forme), Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow), Mimikyu, Snorlax, Florges, Moltres (Galarian), Feraligatr (Shadow), Feraligatr, Jellicent, Giratina (Altered), Cramorant, Guzzlord, Skeledirge, Rillaboom, Lapras, Lapras (Shadow), Dusknoir, Ninetales (Alolan), Dondozo, Dusknoir (Shadow), Registeel, Blastoise, Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), Forretress, Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), Regidrago, Ninetales, Cresselia, Muk (Alolan), Clefable, Talonflame, Forretress (Shadow), Walrein, Walrein (Shadow), Deoxys (Defense), Runerigus, Steelix, Seaking, Cresselia (Shadow), Steelix (Shadow), Swampert, Toucannon, Milotic (Shadow), Primarina, Ampharos, Cradily (Shadow), Malamar (Shadow), Ampharos (Shadow), Talonflame (Shadow), Bellibolt, Seismitoad, Annihilape, Miltank, Forretress (Bug Bite), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)

Which one to build? [all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (317 spreads, no rule fits it -- the list is the build) guarantees 17 of the 43 decision matchups; Build 2 (184 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 16 others; Build 1 wide (712 spreads) keeps 12 of Build 1's 17 guaranteed matchups.

Build criteria: the same control as the one in the scatter strip below; either handle moves both

Empoleon (Shadow) running Waterfall / Blizzard, Hydro Cannon.

[all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (317 spreads, no rule fits it -- the list is the build) guarantees 17 of the 43 decision matchups; Build 2 (184 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 16 others; Build 1 wide (712 spreads) keeps 12 of Build 1's 17 guaranteed matchups.

No single-stat line on this moveset.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 317 spreads by list	317	17 of 43, 0 of them material; 15 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (outside 11%)	3: 0v0 Cresselia, 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), +1 more	0/9/12 (267 of 567 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 1 guarantees (17 of 43), its 317 members all inside attack IV 0-6, defense IV 2-15, HP IV 6-15; that box also holds 663 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 11% 0v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 21% 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 59% 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 89% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 19% 0v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 65% 1v0 (1) 1v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 31% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 45% 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 59%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 62%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 77% 1v2 (1) 1v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 26% 2v1 (2) 2v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 49% 2v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 81% 2v2 (1) 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 60% Members (317), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk <= 196.14 and HP >= 156	712	12 of 43, 0 of them material; 9 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	8: 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow), 0v0 Forretress, +6 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 95% of the same spreads (34 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 317 spreads in 712 of its own, and keeps 12 of Build 1's 17 guaranteed matchups (none of them material). The 5 it gives up out here: 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (grid 18%), 0v1 Runerigus (grid 25%) and 0v0 Forretress (grid 27%), and 2 more.
Build 2 (fork)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 184 spreads by list	184	16 of 43, 1 of them material; 10 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Tinkaton (outside 29%)	4: 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow), 0v0 Forretress, +2 more	4/12/8 (268 of 567 matchups)
What Build 2 guarantees (16 of 43), its 184 members all inside attack IV 0-10, defense IV 2-15, HP IV 3-15; that box also holds 1818 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 60% 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 68%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 90% 1v0 (1) 1v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 34% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 47% 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 61%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 63%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 78% 1v2 (1) 1v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 29%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (3) 2v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 50% 2v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 81% 2v2 (1) 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 61% Members (184), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 2 (fork)'s most-winning spread 4/12/8@35 wins 1 more matchup overall (268 against 267, of 567), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 1 more of the 43 decision matchups (17 against 16).

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 184 spreads by list	184	11 of 24 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 16 of 43 overall, 1 of them material; 10 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Tinkaton (outside 29%)	4: 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow), 0v0 Forretress, +2 more	4/12/8 (86 of 189 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (11 of 24 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 16 of 43 overall), its 184 members all inside attack IV 0-10, defense IV 2-15, HP IV 3-15; that box also holds 1818 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 60% 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 68%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 90% 1v0 (1) 1v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 34% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 47% 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 61%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 63%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 78% 1v2 (1) 1v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 29%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (3) 2v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 50% 2v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 81% 2v2 (1) 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 61% Members (184), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 194.90 and Def >= 120.60 and HP >= 154	1242	10 of 24 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 12 of 43 overall, 1 of them material; 7 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	8: 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow), 0v0 Forretress, +6 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 97% of the same spreads (44 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 184 spreads in 1242 of its own, and keeps 10 of Build 1's 11 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (12 of its 16 overall, 1 of them material). The 4 it gives up out here: 1v2 Tinkaton (grid 32%), 1v0 Lapras (grid 37%) and 1v1 Empoleon (grid 50%), and 1 more.
Build 2 (fork)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 317 spreads by list	317	11 of 24 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 17 of 43 overall, 0 of them material; 15 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (outside 11%)	3: 0v0 Cresselia, 0v0 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), +1 more	0/4/15 (81 of 189 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 2 guarantees (11 of 24 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 17 of 43 overall), its 317 members all inside attack IV 0-6, defense IV 2-15, HP IV 6-15; that box also holds 663 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (rank 9) -- outside 11% 0v0 Forretress (rank 31) -- outside 21% 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 59% 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 89% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 19% 0v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 65% 1v0 (1) 1v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 31% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 45% 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 59%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 62%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 77% 1v2 (1) 1v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 26% 2v1 (2) 2v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 49% 2v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 81% 2v2 (1) 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 60% Members (317), highest stat product first

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

no two- or three-stat rule fits; 709 spreads by list

709

5 of 7 in 1v1 shields; 10 of 43 overall, 0 of them material; 8 hold under every opponent-IV mode

1v1 Empoleon (outside 39%)

nothing the other builds guarantee

0/15/0 (27 of 63 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 1 guarantees (5 of 7 in 1v1 shields; 10 of 43 overall), its 709 members

all inside attack IV 0-10, defense IV 2-15, HP IV 0-15; that box also holds 1755 spreads that are not members

No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build.

0v0 (3)
- 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 54%
- 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 88%
- 0v0 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 97%
1v1 (5)
- 1v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 39%
- 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 58%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 75%
- 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 96%
2v1 (2)
- 2v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 43%
- 2v1 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 78%

Members (709), highest stat product first

Build 1 wide

Atk >= 191.00 + Def/HP staircase (14 steps)

2091

3 of 7 in 1v1 shields; 7 of 43 overall, 0 of them material; 6 hold under every opponent-IV mode

3: 1v1 Empoleon, 1v1 Moltres (Galarian), +1 more

What the wider rule keeps and gives up

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
150	126.4
151	126.4
152	124.6
153	123
154	121.4
155	120.6
156	120.6
157	120.6
158	120.6
159	120.6
160	120.6
161	120.6
162	120.6
163	120.6

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 709 spreads in 2091 of its own, and keeps 3 of Build 1's 5 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (7 of its 10 overall, none of them material).

The 3 it gives up out here: 1v1 Empoleon (grid 50%), 2v1 Feraligatr (grid 52%) and 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (grid 63%).

Rates: outside N% is the share of the spreads NOT in that build that win the same matchup anyway; grid N% (the Notable spreads list and the cards at the top of the page) is the share of all the spreads on the grid. Weight follows the rate: bold = fewer than half of them win it; bold and underlined = fewer than a quarter; bold, underlined and italic = fewer than a tenth; dim = more than nine in ten win it anyway.

Each build's guarantee list is sorted by outside rate: how often the spreads NOT in that build win the same matchup anyway. The lower the rate, the rarer the guarantee.

Against the 31 spreads the mirror-slayer protocol converges on for Empoleon (Shadow) (attack-first here), attack of 203.23 and up wins charge-move priority against 20 of them, and 203.35 and up against 29. Inside a build, take the highest attack you have: no build on this page holds a spread that clears the first cut; the closest is Build 2 at 196.48.

Is mine in one of these?

Paste your Poke Genie CSV, or add one spread by hand, in Check my collection below; the answer comes back here, grouped by build, and your collection stays in your browser.

Shield scenario:

Y: Color:

Stat-product rank against matchups won with PvPoke-default opponent IVs at the league cap over the whole opponent pool and, with Shield scenario on all, every baked shield state -- the view the single-stat line in the expander below was derived on. The Shield scenario selector on this row is the section's own; the scatter's dropdowns and the opponent filter do not drive this panel.

SP1 1/15/14, 4/12/8, 1/8/15

Notable spreads

Every single spread this page names, on one list: the spread that wins the most matchups, the one with the highest avg battle score, SP1, and each build's most-winning member. Entries whose decision-matchup wins overlap by 90% or more are merged, because two spreads that win the same matchups are one offer.

4/12/8 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios) / Build 2's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 2, which guarantees 16 of the 29 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 2v2 Forretress (grid 7%), 2v2 Dusknoir (Shadow) (grid 7%) and 0v0 Empoleon (Shadow) (grid 18%)

1/8/15 -- Highest avg battle score (the scatter's own y axis)

in: It is a member of Build 1, which guarantees 17 of the 29 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 2v0 Jellicent (grid 3%), 0v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (grid 3%) and 1v0 Seaking (grid 3%)

What else is true of 1/8/15

0/9/12 (Build 1's most-winning member) differs from it by 3 decision matchups, so this entry is the offer and they are spellings of it.

1/15/14 -- Stat-product rank-1 (SP1)

in: It is a member of Build 1, which guarantees 17 of the 27 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 2v0 Jellicent (grid 3%), 1v1 Guzzlord (grid 3%) and 0v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (grid 3%)

What to do with this: If you already have one of these spreads, build it: each is the top of this grid on the measure that named it. If you are hunting, hunt a build instead.

Rocket-grunt encounters (this is a shadow, so it cannot be traded) needed to meet one named spread out of the 4096 on this grid: 2839 for a 50% chance, 5678 for a 75% chance. Model: the grunt IV floor is not verified here, and the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid.

The single-stat line

1 of the 7 movesets on this page carries a line. This page is Waterfall / Blizzard, Hydro Cannon, and it carries no line; Metal Sound / Drill Peck, Hydro Cannon is at least 198.67 attack; Waterfall / Drill Peck, Hydro Cannon, Waterfall / Flash Cannon, Hydro Cannon, Waterfall / Hydro Cannon, Hydro Pump, Metal Sound / Blizzard, Hydro Cannon and Waterfall / Hydro Cannon carry no line.

Line: none
Closest: Def >= 123.42 -- 1v1 Empoleon, rank 8, 520 spreads of 4096 on the wrong side
SP1: 1/15/14 -- wins 261 of 567
Alternative: none (the widest pair that buys anything is already 63.0% of the grid)
Decision width: 7 matchups

No attack, defense or HP threshold decides a matchup for Empoleon (Shadow) running Waterfall / Blizzard, Hydro Cannon in Ultra League; build for stat product. The closest thing to a line is 123.42 defense in the 1v1 against Empoleon (rank 8). Every one of the 1510 spreads at or above it wins, and 520 of the 2586 below it win too. It is not a build line because 79.9% of the spreads below it lose, under the 97% a rule with one clean side needs, and 520 of 4096 spreads sit on the wrong side of it, over the 20 a near-exact rule allows.

Bulk does not separate either: the only defense-and-HP pair that buys anything, 116.67 defense with 154 HP, is already 63.0% of the grid. SP1, 1/15/14 at L34.5, wins 261 of its 567 matchups, and is inside that pair. The spread winning the most matchups on this grid is 4/12/8 with 268 of 567, so the whole IV decision here is 7 matchups wide.

rank-1

Shield scenario:

Why these regions

Why these regions and not others. The set panel below is every candidate region the builds were cut from. Under it, the same grid grouped by which contested matchups a spread wins -- its win/loss fingerprint, not its score -- drawn on the stat planes where a region is a shape; crossing a breakpoint or bulkpoint moves a spread to the next cluster.

The set panel (an UpSet plot: a bar chart of set intersections, Lex et al. 2014). Left: the named sets the lattice was built from (rows, labelled 'spreads in the set / decision matchups every member of it wins') and the candidate regions made by intersecting them (columns -- bar height is spreads, the number above it is decision matchups guaranteed in the shield scenarios this setting counts, and a coloured column is one of the builds in the table above). A dot means the region sits inside that row's set. The letters index THIS setting's own eight sets and are re-assigned when the Build criteria change, so compare the row names across Build criteria settings, not the letters.

clusters

Shield scenario:

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	430	202.5	120.2	151	#3076-#4096	5.3	-
C1	3154	198.2	122.2	155	#165-#4000	7.9	Giratina (Altered) (+92pp), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (+91pp), Galarian Moltres (+64pp), Miltank (+48pp); trades away Shadow Dusknoir (-72pp), Primarina (-36pp)
C2	512	193.8	125.2	158	#1-#1290	8.4	Shadow Empoleon (+87pp), Forretress (+81pp), Mimikyu (+55pp), Galarian Moltres (+36pp); trades away Shadow Milotic (-93pp), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (-91pp), Cresselia (-22pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2
Galarian Moltres	0%	64%	100%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	0%	91%	0%
Forretress	0%	19%	100%
Mimikyu	0%	19%	73%
Shadow Milotic	100%	93%	0%
Shadow Empoleon	0%	8%	95%
Giratina (Altered)	8%	100%	100%
Shadow Ampharos	100%	88%	100%
Shadow Dusknoir	72%	1%	0%
Ampharos	0%	10%	0%
Cresselia	89%	98%	76%
Miltank	52%	100%	100%
Primarina	36%	0%	0%
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	77%	100%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Galarian Moltres	62%	wins iff sp >= 3,731,344	91%	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	70%	wins iff atk >= 194.97	83%	named
Forretress	27%	wins iff atk < 196.25	90%	named
Mimikyu	24%	wins iff def >= 124.54	99%	named
Shadow Milotic	82%	wins iff atk >= 195.57	100%	named
Shadow Empoleon	18%	wins iff sp >= 3,803,807	95%	named
Giratina (Altered)	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,677,091	96%	named
Shadow Ampharos	91%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Dusknoir	8%	wins iff atk >= 201.97	100%	named
Ampharos	7%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Cresselia	95%	wins iff atk >= 193.30	98%	named
Miltank	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,658,905	98%	named
Primarina	4%	wins iff atk >= 202.88	100%	named
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	98%	wins iff atk < 203.51	99%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1644	200.6	120.4	153	#1171-#4096	3.7	-
C1	2452	196.4	123.7	156	#1-#3410	5.8	Shadow Giratina (Altered) (+74pp), Empoleon (+71pp), Cresselia (+52pp), Galarian Moltres (+52pp); trades away Shadow Corviknight (-78pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Empoleon	7%	78%
Shadow Corviknight	96%	18%
Galarian Moltres	32%	83%
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	21%	95%
Cresselia	48%	100%
Primarina	71%	100%
Tinkaton	92%	100%
Guzzlord	0%	5%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Empoleon	50%	wins iff def >= 123.42	87%	named
Shadow Corviknight	49%	wins iff atk >= 198.15	99%	named
Galarian Moltres	63%	wins iff hp >= 154	90%	named
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	65%	wins iff def >= 120.62	93%	named
Cresselia	79%	wins iff sp >= 3,703,975	94%	named
Primarina	88%	wins iff hp >= 151	94%	named
Tinkaton	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,650,699	98%	named
Guzzlord	3%	wins iff def >= 127.40	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	357	193.4	125.3	158	#1-#1195	4.1	-
C1	3739	198.5	122.1	154	#98-#4096	4.7	Cramorant (+91pp), Bellibolt (+90pp), Primarina (+70pp); trades away Forretress (-69pp), Shadow Cradily (-55pp), Dondozo (-41pp), Galarian Moltres (-41pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Cradily	100%	45%
Galarian Moltres	100%	59%
Primarina	0%	70%
Cramorant	0%	91%
Empoleon	86%	87%
Deoxys (Defense)	0%	11%
Bellibolt	10%	100%
Shadow Dusknoir	0%	8%
Forretress	69%	1%
Dondozo	43%	2%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Cradily	50%	wins iff sp >= 3,778,962	72%	named
Galarian Moltres	63%	wins iff hp >= 154	100%	named
Primarina	64%	wins iff hp >= 153	78%	named
Cramorant	83%	wins iff atk >= 195.36	100%	named
Empoleon	87%	wins iff hp < 160	89%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	10%	wins iff atk >= 201.63	100%	named
Bellibolt	92%	wins iff atk >= 194.30	100%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	7%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Forretress	7%	wins iff atk < 194.06	97%	named
Dondozo	6%	wins iff hp >= 161	96%	named

all scenarios: 32 win/loss bits (one per contested opponent per scenario) concatenated across 3 of 9 shield scenarios (0v1, 0v2, 1v0, 1v2, 2v0, 2v1 excluded as degenerate); 370 distinct win patterns; K=2 clusters (silhouette 0.42); split at atk 195.38.

Sharpest single scenarios on this page: 1v1 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.58 over 8 contested opponents, split atk 198.79) and 2v2 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.56 over 10 contested opponents, split atk 194.32) -- pick them in the dropdown above.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3372	198.9	121.9	154	#248-#4096	16.9	-
C1	724	194.2	124.9	158	#1-#1549	19.3	Shadow Empoleon [0v0] (+84pp), Forretress [0v0] (+78pp), Empoleon [1v1] (+61pp), Shadow Cradily [2v2] (+61pp); trades away Shadow Milotic [0v0] (-96pp), Cramorant [2v2] (-92pp), Shadow Corviknight [1v1] (-60pp), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [0v0] (-51pp)

Per-cluster win rates vs each contested opponent

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Cradily [2v2]	39%	100%
Empoleon [1v1]	39%	100%
Shadow Corviknight [1v1]	60%	0%
Galarian Moltres [0v0]	54%	100%
Galarian Moltres [1v1]	55%	99%
Galarian Moltres [2v2]	56%	96%
Primarina [2v2]	68%	43%
Shadow Giratina (Altered) [1v1]	58%	98%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [0v0]	79%	28%
Forretress [0v0]	13%	91%
Mimikyu [0v0]	15%	63%
Cresselia [1v1]	74%	100%
Shadow Milotic [0v0]	99%	3%
Shadow Empoleon [0v0]	3%	87%
Cramorant [2v2]	100%	8%
Empoleon [2v2]	88%	79%
Primarina [1v1]	86%	100%
Deoxys (Defense) [2v2]	12%	0%
Giratina (Altered) [0v0]	88%	100%
Shadow Ampharos [0v0]	89%	100%
Shadow Dusknoir [0v0]	10%	0%
Bellibolt [2v2]	100%	55%
Ampharos [0v0]	9%	0%
Shadow Dusknoir [2v2]	3%	25%
Forretress [2v2]	0%	38%
Dondozo [2v2]	1%	28%
Cresselia [0v0]	97%	83%
Miltank [0v0]	94%	100%
Primarina [0v0]	5%	0%
Tinkaton [1v1]	96%	100%
Guzzlord [1v1]	1%	10%
Shadow Giratina (Altered) [0v0]	97%	100%

Green tint = the cluster mostly wins that matchup, red tint = mostly loses; the percentage is the share of the cluster's IVs that win.

Stat rules that reproduce the clusters (in-sample accuracy 98.6%)

atk < 195.38:
  hp < 154.50:
    -> cluster C1 (n=77)
  hp >= 154.50:
    atk < 195.17:
      -> cluster C1 (n=551)
    atk >= 195.17:
      -> cluster C1 (n=62)
atk >= 195.38:
  atk < 195.52:
    -> cluster C0 (n=51)
  atk >= 195.52:
    atk < 195.82:
      -> cluster C0 (n=154)
    atk >= 195.82:
      -> cluster C0 (n=3201)

Depth-3 decision tree over (atk, def, hp). Accuracy is in-sample (regularized by a minimum leaf size), not cross-validated -- read it as "how well the clusters reduce to stat regions", not a prediction claim.

Matchup flip thresholds (candidate anchors)

The single stat and threshold that most accurately predicts win/loss across all IVs -- misclassifications allowed, so it is a diagnostic and a candidate anchor, not a build target. The "flips at" cutoffs under "Threats where your build choice matters" answer the other question (the lowest cutoff whose 75/25 split is clean) and are usually higher for the same opponent.

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Cradily [2v2]	50%	wins iff sp >= 3,778,962	72%	named
Empoleon [1v1]	50%	wins iff def >= 123.42	87%	named
Shadow Corviknight [1v1]	49%	wins iff atk >= 198.15	99%	named
Galarian Moltres [0v0]	62%	wins iff sp >= 3,731,344	91%	named
Galarian Moltres [1v1]	63%	wins iff hp >= 154	90%	named
Galarian Moltres [2v2]	63%	wins iff hp >= 154	100%	named
Primarina [2v2]	64%	wins iff hp >= 153	78%	named
Shadow Giratina (Altered) [1v1]	65%	wins iff def >= 120.62	93%	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [0v0]	70%	wins iff atk >= 194.97	83%	named
Forretress [0v0]	27%	wins iff atk < 196.25	90%	named
Mimikyu [0v0]	24%	wins iff def >= 124.54	99%	named
Cresselia [1v1]	79%	wins iff sp >= 3,703,975	94%	named
Shadow Milotic [0v0]	82%	wins iff atk >= 195.57	100%	named
Shadow Empoleon [0v0]	18%	wins iff sp >= 3,803,807	95%	named
Cramorant [2v2]	83%	wins iff atk >= 195.36	100%	named
Empoleon [2v2]	87%	wins iff hp < 160	89%	named
Primarina [1v1]	88%	wins iff hp >= 151	94%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [2v2]	10%	wins iff atk >= 201.63	100%	named
Giratina (Altered) [0v0]	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,677,091	96%	named
Shadow Ampharos [0v0]	91%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Dusknoir [0v0]	8%	wins iff atk >= 201.97	100%	named
Bellibolt [2v2]	92%	wins iff atk >= 194.30	100%	named
Ampharos [0v0]	7%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Dusknoir [2v2]	7%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Forretress [2v2]	7%	wins iff atk < 194.06	97%	named
Dondozo [2v2]	6%	wins iff hp >= 161	96%	named
Cresselia [0v0]	95%	wins iff atk >= 193.30	98%	named
Miltank [0v0]	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,658,905	98%	named
Primarina [0v0]	4%	wins iff atk >= 202.88	100%	named
Tinkaton [1v1]	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,650,699	98%	named
Guzzlord [1v1]	3%	wins iff def >= 127.40	100%	named
Shadow Giratina (Altered) [0v0]	98%	wins iff atk < 203.51	99%	named

Rows are ordered by discriminating power (win rate closest to 50%). "Rule accuracy" is how well that single stat threshold predicts the win/loss across all IVs, and is only shown when it beats always-predicting the majority outcome; high-accuracy UNNAMED rows are candidate new anchors. "Named" means an authored anchor names that opponent (alt-moveset / IV-variant rows inherit their base opponent's anchor).

Computed at bake time for moveset WATERFALL / BLIZZARD, HYDRO_CANNON with PvPoke default opponent IVs and bait-selective shield play, over the full opponent pool; this does not follow the scatter's moveset / opponent-IV / bait dropdowns or the opponent filter.

How this works

Per shield scenario: an opponent is contested when between 2% and 98% of this dive's IV spreads beat it (everyone else is settled and can't distinguish IVs). Each IV's fingerprint is its win/loss vector over those opponents; fingerprints are clustered bottom-up (agglomerative, Hamming distance, average linkage). The number of clusters, K, is chosen by silhouette -- a 0-to-1 score of how cleanly the fingerprints separate, where above about 0.5 the clusters are distinct groups and below 0.30 the headline says "weak separation" and the clusters are tendencies rather than tiers -- under a parsimony floor (a split must keep every cluster above a minimum size, and the smallest K in 2-6 within 0.03 of the best silhouette wins). Silhouettes are comparable between the scenarios on this page, not between species. Clusters are ordered weakest to strongest by mean contested wins. The scatter panels project the same 4,096 IV spreads onto each pair of battle stats; clusters that overlap completely in score separate cleanly there. A scenario is reported as degenerate (no clustering attempted) when it has fewer than 6 contested opponents or fewer than 8 distinct win patterns -- on that little data every candidate K scores near-perfectly, which is a measurement artifact and not structure -- and its bits are left out of the all scenarios fingerprint. A scenario that clears the floor but has no split keeping every cluster above the minimum size is reported as fragmented instead, and its bits still count toward the combined view. The all scenarios bits are ordered most-discriminating first, which is the tie-break the linkage uses when several merges are equally close. Replaces the retired score-gap cluster heuristic (2026-07), which usually (~77% of sampled runs) fired on float-level jitter in the opponent-averaged score, and even when it did catch a real tier could not name which matchups defined it.

Evidence

1. Header

Empoleon (Shadow) -- Ultra League

WATERFALL / BLIZZARD, HYDRO_CANNON (arm 1 of 7)

Level view: L50. Bake 2026-09-26. Blob 20260926_200751_Empoleon_ultra_shadow.replay.pkl.gz.

Opponent pool: 63 entries (Custom pool from ul_top60.txt (60 mons)). Grid: 4096 IV spreads x 9 shield scenarios.

Opponent-IV settings baked: PvPoke-default opponent IVs; PvPoke-default opponent IVs, focal never baits; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits.

Rankings snapshot 2026-09-26.

Stats are shadow-effective (attack x1.2 applied); the charge-move priority line is not (see Provenance).

2. Floor

14 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

14 single-stat values do separate a cell exactly (12 on attack, 2 on Def, 0 on HP, over 64 contested cells), but none of them clears every gate while splitting between 25% and 60% of the grid, which is what an exact line has to do to carry a floor label.

The closest dirty thresholds on this dive, printed as evidence and not as lines:

At the one decimal place PvPoke and Poke Genie display, the top row reads Def >= 123.4, which selects 1510 spreads where the exact value selects 1510: 0 more spreads land inside a line printed that way. The table prints the exact value because it is the one that selects the set the counts beside it describe.

A split is listed only when it puts fewer spreads on the wrong side than the constant rule does (predict one outcome for the whole grid) and when it keeps between 10% and 90% of the grid on each side.

cell	rank	closest split	spreads on the wrong side	constant rule gets wrong	wins at/above	wins below
1v1 Empoleon	rank 8	Def >= 123.42	520	2030	1510 of 1510	520 of 2586
2v2 Moltres (Galarian)	rank 13	HP >= 154	18	1517	2579 of 2597	0 of 1499
1v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow)	rank 32	Def >= 120.61	304	1430	2666 of 2970	0 of 1126
1v1 Moltres (Galarian)	rank 13	HP >= 154	411	1534	2374 of 2597	188 of 1499

3. Lines on the other stats

No axis carries a line on this arm, so there is nothing to compare across them.

4. Example spreads

Existence proofs; each selection rule is printed with its spread.

There is no line on this arm, so the rules run over the whole grid rather than over a set of clearers.

The spread winning the most matchups on this grid is 4/12/8 with 268 of 567, so the whole IV decision here is 7 matchups wide.

rule	IVs	level	Atk / Def / HP	stat product	contested cells	all cells
most cells won on the whole grid	4/12/8	L35.0	195.57 / 125.66 / 156	98.17% (#225)	43	268
highest stat product (the rank-1 spread)	1/15/14	L34.5	192.09 / 127.07 / 160	100.00% (#1)	36	261
bulkiest (max Def x HP) among the whole grid with SP >= 95%	0/15/14	L34.5	191.17 / 127.07 / 160	99.53% (#4)	36	261

Cells won by shield scenario

spread	0v0	0v1	0v2	1v0	1v1	1v2	2v0	2v1	2v2	total
rank-1 1/15/14	31	5	1	52	25	6	63	54	24	261
4/12/8	34	6	2	51	25	6	61	56	27	268
1/15/14	31	5	1	52	25	6	63	54	24	261
0/15/14	31	5	1	52	25	6	63	54	24	261

5. Rank-1 check

Stat-product rank-1 is 1/15/14 at L34.5: 192.09 attack / 127.07 Def / 160 HP. It wins 261 of 567 cells (36 of the 64 contested ones).

There is no floor on this arm, so there is no line for it to be on one side of.

The lowest material rung it misses is 195.35 (2v2 Cramorant).

It is a member of the Alternative target below.

6. Alternative target

Def >= 116.67, HP >= 154: 2579 spreads (63.0%), stat product 93.3% to 100.0% of rank-1, attack 191.17-203.24.

63.0% of the grid already satisfies this, so it is not a target to hunt for. Read it the other way round: the 37.0% of spreads outside it lose 1 contested matchup that every member wins: 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13).

Rule: among (Def, HP) rectangles with at least 100 members, the one winning the most contested cells with EVERY member that at most 1% of the spreads outside it win, counting only cells against a top-50 opponent in a non-degenerate scenario; ties broken by member count.

Members win 251-268 cells in total.

IV envelope of the members -- attack IV 0-15, Def IV 0-15, HP IV 0-15. Members per attack IV: 0: 235, 1: 227, 2: 218, 3: 207, 4: 196, 5: 189, 6: 179, 7: 169, 8: 157, 9: 149, 10: 137, 11: 125, 12: 116, 13: 107, 14: 92, 15: 76.

Highest stat product inside it: 1/15/14 at L34.5 (100.00% of rank-1), 2/15/15 at L34.0 (99.70% of rank-1), 0/15/12 at L35.0 (99.67% of rank-1), 0/15/14 at L34.5 (99.53% of rank-1), 0/15/15 at L34.5 (99.53% of rank-1).

7. Cost

This test finds no reverse single-stat clean cut: no cell on this dive is won by every LOW spread and lost by every high one.

8. Rungs above

No floor on this arm, so no ladder above one.

9. Material clean cuts

Clean cuts holding between 10% and 90% of the grid, ascending. The widest of them sit under nearly every spread on the grid; the narrow ones at the bottom of the table do not.

cut	cells owned	spreads	settings	mechanism
Atk >= 195.35	2v2 Cramorant (rank 18)	3418 (83.4%)	4/4	Mechanism: WATERFALL damage steps 7 -> 8 across the cut.
Atk >= 195.56	0v0 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50)	3355 (81.9%)	2/4	Mechanism: HYDRO_CANNON damage steps 53 -> 54 across the cut.
Atk >= 198.15	1v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4)	2023 (49.4%)	2/4	Mechanism: WATERFALL damage steps 12 -> 13 across the cut.
Atk >= 198.31	1v0 Registeel (rank 28)	1946 (47.5%)	2/4	Mechanism: WATERFALL damage steps 7 -> 8 across the cut.
Atk >= 200.22	2v1 Blastoise (rank 29)	939 (22.9%)	2/4	Mechanism: HYDRO_CANNON damage steps 43 -> 44 across the cut.

10. Bulk

Clean cuts by axis: 12 on attack, 2 on Def, 0 on HP.

11. Coverage

Omitted: there is no floor on this arm, so there is no line to place.

12. Mirror

Against the pool's own Empoleon (Shadow) entry. Seat: our side is the optimised row; the mirror opponent always baits.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 1183 0 0 4096 0 0 4096 4096 4096.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 1183 0 0 4096 0 0 4096 4096 4096.

shields	win rate over the whole grid
0v0	18.0%
0v1	0.0%
0v2	0.0%
1v0	100.0%
1v1	0.0%
1v2	0.0%
2v0	100.0%
2v1	100.0%
2v2	100.0%

13. Changes the score, not the matchup

Cells won (or lost) by every spread where the battle score still steps by at least 60 at one attainable attack value.

Ordered by how close the step comes to the win line (500), nearest first: the question this field answers is how close a cell is to becoming a matchup, not how large the swing inside it is.

value	cell	rank	score step	points from 500	outcome
Atk >= 203.51	2v2 Malamar (Shadow)	rank 54	394 -> 463	37 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 193.30	1v0 Cresselia	rank 35	543 -> 655	43 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 192.39	1v1 Cradily (Shadow)	rank 53	581 -> 874	81 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 195.35	2v2 Florges	rank 12	581 -> 692	81 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 202.88	0v1 Primarina	rank 51	222 -> 407	93 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 203.65	0v0 Toucannon	rank 49	617 -> 741	117 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 202.88	1v0 Primarina	rank 51	644 -> 780	144 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 192.65	0v1 Talonflame (Shadow)	rank 56	276 -> 345	155 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 192.65	0v2 Talonflame (Shadow)	rank 56	276 -> 345	155 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 194.46	1v2 Dusknoir (Shadow)	rank 27	268 -> 336	164 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 193.43	2v1 Melmetal	rank 5	688 -> 768	188 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 193.30	2v0 Cresselia	rank 35	714 -> 854	214 (widening)	won on both sides

14. Not claimed

50 of 64 contested matchups have no clean single-stat rule and are not claimed.

6 of 41 top-50 matchups are listed, one per base species and closest to an even split first; 35 more are not.

cell	rank	win rate over the whole grid
1v1 Empoleon	rank 8	49.6%
2v1 Feraligatr	rank 15	52.5%
0v0 Moltres (Galarian)	rank 13	62.0%
1v0 Lapras	rank 22	36.6%
1v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow)	rank 32	65.1%
0v1 Florges	rank 12	67.6%

15. How sure

12 clean attack cuts, 2 on Def, 0 on HP, over 64 contested cells (225 cells are won by every spread, 278 lost by every spread).

Scenarios barred from carrying a floor -- fewer than 6 contested cells, or fewer than 8 distinct opponent columns among them; the dive page's "degenerate" flag applies the same two numbers to its own stricter counts, so it can flag a different set: 0v1 (4 contested, 6 distinct opponent columns), 0v2 (3 contested, 4 distinct opponent columns), 1v0 (4 contested, 6 distinct opponent columns), 2v0 (2 contested, 3 distinct opponent columns).

Independent check: the dive page's matchup clusters, under "Why these regions", which partition this same grid by whole win/loss fingerprint across all 3 non-degenerate shield scenarios, splits it at attack 195.38 (K=2, silhouette 0.42).

Not measured here: opponent IVs outside the baked cohorts, post-match HP and shields, XL or dust cost, and any live-game check of the priority convention.

16. Provenance

Every threshold in this section is one of three things, and each is badged where it is printed. An EXACT clean cut: every spread at or above it wins the named cell and no spread below it does. A ONE-SIDED GATE: one side is pure and the other is at least 97% pure -- either nothing below it wins (clearing it is necessary) or everything at or above it wins (clearing it is sufficient). A NEAR-EXACT split: at most 0.5% of the grid sits on the wrong side of it in total. The win predicate is gopvpsim.battle.is_win (score > 500; 500 itself is a tie, not a win).

That is stricter than the two numbers the dive page prints for the same opponent: the Threats "flips at" boundary (a 75/25 gate, so spreads on the passing side can still lose) and the Matchup clusters flip table's single-stat split for that one opponent (the most accurate such split, misclassifications allowed). The cluster line in "How sure" above is a third thing again: not one opponent but the stat rule that reproduces that section's "all scenarios" partition of the whole grid.

Priority ties: the coverage ladder counts an exact attack tie as NOT beaten. The engine is seat-dependent on an exact tie, so a tied line is not a guarantee in either direction.

Ranks and opponent builds are read live from the 2026-09-26 rankings snapshot and the current gamemaster; this blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so the render is a function of the blob plus those two live reads.

Auto-derived: this section is generated by scripts/deep_dive_brief.py from the replay blob. No human prose is in it.

How the line was selected (gates and guards)

Decision band for the floor (D1): the lowest ELIGIBLE rung whose clearer pool sits inside [25%, 60%] of the grid. Materiality band for a rung: [10%, 90%].

To be ELIGIBLE AS THE FLOOR -- not to be listed as a rung -- a cut needs at least 20 attack/20 defense/5 HP distinct attainable values below it, an opponent of rank 50 or better outside the caveat list, a non-degenerate shield scenario, a win rate at or above the cut of at least 90% in every setting, and a closed-form mechanism. Listing is a weaker bar: a rung is printed when it keeps 25% of the grid (above the floor) or sits in the materiality band (below it) AND points the same way in at least 2 settings, so a listed rung may be unattributed, low-ranked or 2-of-4.

A cut can fail several gates at once, so the failure tally below sums to more than the number of cuts.

Co-gate sub-rectangles need 5% of the grid; the alternative target needs 100 members; a score-only step needs 60 points. These constants are calibrated on one species and are parameters of the stage that uses them, not tuned per dive.

Floor pool by primitive on the attack axis -- the axis the cross-stat rule selected -- each selected on its own under the same band and the same gates: exact -> Atk >= 198.15 (1v1 Corviknight (Shadow), 49.4%) rejected on G-direction (2 of 4 settings); one-sided gate -> no candidate in the band; near-exact -> no candidate in the band. Selected: no floor. Selection takes the lowest eligible rung in the band; a stronger primitive within 0.50 stat points of it wins the tie, in the order exact, one-sided gate, near-exact. A gate needs 97% of its dirty side pointing the right way; a near-exact split needs at most 0.5% of the grid on the wrong side. Only exact rungs merge, in either direction.

Degradation ladder: rung reached = c. 14 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

Of 14 clean cuts, 1 clears every gate. Gate failures: G-direction 7, G-material-lo 5, G-rank 4, G-material-hi 4, G-material-gap 4, G-scenario 2.

Of 47 one-sided gate and near-exact candidates, 1 clears every gate. Gate failures: G-material-hi 29, G-material-gap 28, G-direction 28, G-attributed 27, G-material-lo 16, G-rank 10, G-scenario 7.

Closest dirty thresholds on cells with no clean rule: 1v1 Empoleon Def >= 123.42 (520 spreads on the wrong side); 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) HP >= 154 (18 spreads on the wrong side); 1v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) Def >= 120.61 (304 spreads on the wrong side); 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) HP >= 154 (411 spreads on the wrong side).

band	attack line it selects	cell
[25%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 55%]	no floor	-
[25%, 50%]	no floor	-
[20%, 60%]	no floor	-
[30%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 70%]	no floor	-

Terms used here

build criteria: Which shield scenarios the ranking counts: all nine equally, the three even ones, or 1v1 alone.
build: A region of the IV grid you can aim at -- every spread that clears the same combination of thresholds, at least fifty of them.
guaranteed: Won by every single spread in the region, not by most of them.
decision matchup: A (shield scenario, opponent) pair the IV choice decides: a top-50 opponent that some spreads on this grid beat and others lose to.
wide: The looser rule drawn around a region of the grid: it holds every spread that region holds and more, so it wins less for every member but is easier to hit.
stat-product rank-1 (SP1): The IV spread with the largest attack x defense x HP at this league's CP cap -- the bulk-first spread most IV tools list first. Written SP1 where it is named repeatedly.
material: A matchup no single-stat threshold of a hundred or more spreads wins more than 95% of the time, so it takes two stats at once to claim it.
opponent-IV mode: One of the ways every opponent was made for this bake -- PvPoke-default IVs or the bulkiest ones, each with and without the focal side baiting -- so a claim that holds in all of them does not depend on how the opponent was made.
stat product: Attack x defense x HP at the league's CP cap, the usual one-number summary of an IV spread.
fork: A second region with no spread in common with the first that wins a noticeably different set of matchups outright -- the two overlap on less than 80% of them -- so they are a real choice rather than two spellings of one.
staircase: A rule whose defense floor steps DOWN as HP goes up, so bulk can be spent on either stat: one floor per HP value rather than one floor for all of them.
outside rate: How often the spreads left OUT of a region win the same matchup its own members all win -- one the rest of the grid takes anyway is not what you bought.
charge-move priority (CMP): When both sides throw a charged move on the same turn, the higher attack stat goes first.
UpSet plot: A bar chart of set intersections: each column is one candidate region, and the dots under it mark which named sets it lies inside (Lex et al. 2014).
contested matchups: The matchups some IV spreads on this grid win and others lose -- the only ones an IV choice can change.
bulkpoint: A defense value across which an opponent's damage into you steps down by a whole point, or an HP value across which the number of hits they need to knock you out changes.
one-sided gate: A stat value with one clean side: either nothing below it wins the matchup, or everything at or above it does -- so clearing it is required, or enough, but not both.
rung: An attack value above the line at which some further matchup flips for every spread that reaches it.

Moveset: Switching movesets reloads the page; pasted CSV will need to be re-loaded. Shields: Build criteria: Opponent IVs: Bait: Y-axis: Color: Anchors: Build criteria weights shield scenarios in: Which one to build?, the all-scenarios clusters, and Shields = All (by build criteria). Nothing else on this page is re-weighted by it. Threshold tiers (e.g. GH Great / GH Good) are expert stat-cutoff regions defined in Threshold Tiers below. Hover legend to isolate; click to lock.

Check my collection - Your collection stays in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Paste your Poke Genie CSV export below, or click Choose file… to load one from disk. You’ll see which of your Empoleons (and pre-evolutions) qualify for each tier, overlaid on the scatter plot.

Show only my mons

Or enter one at a time - Atk/Def/HP IVs (0-15), level, shadow flag. Same format as PvPoke / PvPIVs.

Species Atk Def HP Level Shadow

Compare candidates - up to 7 of your IV spreads, side by side: wins, mirror, and the close calls that decide the build

Add a spread: Atk Def HP 0 / 7 added

Highlight IVs:

Top IVs Rows: Ranked by this dive's battle simulation (not fetched from PvPoke). Click any column header to sort.

Battle-Rating Distribution

Per-matchup battle-rating distribution for the reference IV (PvPoke default or Rank 1, matching the Opponent-IVs dropdown) across the opponent pool, under the currently-selected Shields / Opponent-IVs / Bait.

Waterfall / Blizzard, Hydro Cannon

IV Recommendations

Moveset: Waterfall / Blizzard, Hydro Cannon. Vs PvPoke default opponents.

IV Flavor Guide (Simulation)

Auto-generated from simulation matchup data. Flavor names (e.g. "Premium Bulk", "Fortified {Opp}", "{Opp} Slayer") are derived from which opponents each IV cluster beats, not from the expert-authored Threshold Tiers section above. This IV Flavor Guide and the Threshold Tiers answer different questions and may not line up 1:1. New to flavor cards? The IV Flavor Guide walks through the six name families and the trade-off layout.

Charm-class fast moves typically favor stat product on Empoleon: more attacks in, more fast moves survived, usually outweighs one extra charge-move damage.

In Ultra League, Empoleon has 4 flavors: General Good, Fortified Miltank, Fortified Jellicent, and Fortified Forretress. In general, the General Good variation may be the flavor of choice, as it plays up Empoleon's potential vs Cresselia, Moltres (Galarian), Ampharos, among others.

Flavor	IVs	%	Catches needed
General Good [Recommended]	4068	99.3%	almost any will do
Fortified Miltank	1	0.0%	very rare
Fortified Jellicent	54	1.3%	~53-105 for a 50-75% chance
Fortified Forretress	202	4.9%	~14-28 for a 50-75% chance

General Good (191.18 Atk, 115.79 Def, 148 HP) [Recommended]

115.79 Def and 148 HP is a safe baseline for Empoleon, with an attack floor of 191.18 Atk for coverage against key opponents.

148 HP is also a safe spot, helping secure the mirror and key matchups vs Ampharos, Clefable.

116.21 Def with 148+ HP for Cradily (incl. Shadow) (1v2), Cresselia (0v0, 1v1), Dondozo (2v1), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v0), Giratina (Altered) (incl. Shadow) (0v0, 1v1), Lapras (1v0), Moltres (Galarian) (0v0, 1v1, 2v2), Primarina (1v1, 2v2), Tinkaton (1v2), Runerigus (0v1)
117.15 Def with 158+ HP for the Tinkaton (1v2)
117.77 Def with 158+ HP for the Empoleon (incl. Shadow) (0v0)
117.91 Def with 151+ HP for the Ampharos (incl. Shadow) (0v0)
119.14 Def for the Empoleon (1v1)
119.34 Def for the Giratina (Altered) (incl. Shadow) (1v1 with bait)
120.49 Def for the Empoleon (2v2)
120.75 Def with 157+ HP for the Runerigus (0v1)

Fortified Miltank (128.70 Def, 154 HP)

The "Fortified Miltank" Empoleon fortifies its bulk to gain several matchups including the Miltank 1v1, 2v2, the Empoleon (Shadow) 0v0, the Feraligatr (Shadow) 2v1. This requires 128.70 Def with 154 HP.

Note: The higher stat requirement will cost several matchups, such as the Bellibolt 2v2, Cramorant 2v2, Cresselia 0v0, among others.

Fortified Jellicent (127.10 Def, 154 HP)

The "Fortified Jellicent" Empoleon fortifies its bulk to gain several matchups including the Jellicent 1v0, 2v0, the Empoleon (Shadow) 0v0, the Feraligatr (Shadow) 2v1. This requires 127.10 Def with 154 HP.

Note: The higher stat requirement will cost several matchups, such as the Cramorant 2v2, Cresselia 0v0, Dusknoir 1v1, among others.

Fortified Forretress (125.17 Def, 156 HP)

The "Fortified Forretress" Empoleon fortifies its bulk to gain several matchups including the Forretress 0v0, 2v2, the Empoleon (Shadow) 0v0, the Feraligatr (Shadow) 2v1. This requires 125.17 Def with 156 HP.

Note: The higher stat requirement will cost several matchups, such as the Bellibolt 2v2, Cramorant 2v2, Cresselia 0v0, among others.

Rank-1 Empoleon (1/15/14) meets the General Good thresholds.

Simulation-Derived IV Tiers

Auto-derived from the sim (not expert-authored).

Threshold Tiers

Stat-target headlines from thresholds/*.toml, each grouped with the named anchors its spec clears and the IV spreads that meet it. Within each tier card, bullets are grouped by opponent and sorted by the required stat (Def or Atk) ascending - read top-to-bottom in the order a player would clear them as their stat grows. The flat list of every anchor (regardless of tier) lives in Anchor-Driven Matchup Flips below. New to tier cards? The Threshold Tiers guide walks through what the stat cutoffs and member counts mean. A tier's anchors come from two passes over the anchor list:

Primary bullets - the tier has a cutoff on the anchor's target axis (atk or def) that meets or exceeds the anchor's threshold. Consequences:
- Subset case: if tier A is strictly stricter than tier B on the anchor axis, A's bullet list is a superset of B's. Overlap is intentional.
- Crossed-cutoff case: tier A has only an atk cutoff, tier B has only a def cutoff - neither is a subset of the other. Atk anchors appear only on A; def anchors only on B.
- Slayer-axis IV-count case: two tiers can list the same atk anchor but have different member-IV counts because a stricter tier's def cutoff excludes def-sacrificing spreads that the looser tier keeps. Check the (−N vs parent) callout on the tier header to spot this at a glance.
Anchors we get for free (collapsed) - the tier has no cutoff on the anchor's target axis, but every IV in the tier clears the anchor's threshold anyway. These would be silently dropped by the primary filter; we surface them in a separate collapsed block so the card isn't misleading.

Fortified Miltank · def≥128.70, hp≥154 (1 IV spread) (−53 vs Fortified Jellicent (def-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 141 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Shadow Ampharos, Blastoise, Clefable, Shadow Cradily, +21 more. Bulkpoint(s) vs Miltank (6 scenario flips).

115.80 Def + 154 HP for Tinkaton (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
116.17 Def + 153 HP for Tinkaton (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
116.75 Def + 153 HP for Tinkaton (Bulldoze) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
117.58 Def + 154 HP for Tinkaton (Flash Cannon) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
119.41 Def + 156 HP for Tinkaton (Rock Smash) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
119.72 Def + 153 HP for Tinkaton (Heavy Slam) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
119.17 Def for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
119.34 Def for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
119.93 Def for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
120.62 Def for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
121.19 Def for Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
123.36 Def for Empoleon (Metal Claw) vs Empoleon (1v1)
123.36 Def for Empoleon (Metal Sound) vs Empoleon (1v1)
115.79 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.19 Def + 152 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.31 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.60 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
117.09 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
117.58 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.11 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
116.75 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
116.75 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
124.53 Def for Mimikyu (Shadow Claw) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
124.53 Def for Mimikyu (Hex) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
115.94 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (0v2)
116.22 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Trailblaze) vs Florges (0v2)
116.53 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Moonblast) vs Florges (0v2)
116.82 Def + 153 HP for Florges (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (0v2)
117.34 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Psychic) vs Florges (0v2)
117.34 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Chilling Water) vs Florges (0v2)
125.16 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Vine Whip) vs Florges (0v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres (Sucker Punch) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.95 Def + 149 HP for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
117.53 Def + 149 HP for Galarian Moltres (Ancient Power) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
124.15 Def + 162 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Bite) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.15 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.15 Def + 162 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.15 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.70 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.79 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
128.03 Def for Shadow Feraligatr (Waterfall) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
116.91 Def + 158 HP for Jellicent (Shadow Ball) vs Jellicent (1v0, 2v0)
117.63 Def + 159 HP for Jellicent (Surf) vs Jellicent (1v0, 2v0)
118.98 Def + 161 HP for Jellicent (Bubble Beam) vs Jellicent (1v0, 2v0)
119.80 Def + 160 HP for Jellicent (Ice Beam) vs Jellicent (2v0)
123.01 Def + 150 HP for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (1v1 with bait)
123.78 Def + 150 HP for Guzzlord (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (1v1 with bait)
127.03 Def + 160 HP for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (1v1 with bait)
127.32 Def for Guzzlord (Dragon Tail) vs Guzzlord (1v1 with bait)
128.14 Def for Guzzlord (Sludge Bomb) vs Guzzlord (1v1 with bait)
116.00 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.12 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.32 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Surf) vs Lapras (1v0)
118.52 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v0)
122.47 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Ice Shard) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.23 Def + 159 HP for Dondozo (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
116.55 Def + 159 HP for Dondozo (Surf) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
117.15 Def + 159 HP for Dondozo (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
117.31 Def + 158 HP for Dondozo (Outrage) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
119.66 Def for Dondozo (Waterfall) vs Dondozo (2v1)
115.93 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
116.61 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.29 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.49 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.49 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
118.16 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Feint Attack) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
118.16 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Charm) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
118.69 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
115.93 Def + 148 HP for Forretress (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
116.19 Def + 155 HP for Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
116.74 Def + 154 HP for Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
117.21 Def + 149 HP for Forretress (Volt Switch) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
118.87 Def + 159 HP for Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
118.87 Def + 159 HP for Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Forretress (0v0)
127.16 Def + 155 HP for Forretress (Struggle Bug) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
116.07 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
119.12 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
119.12 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
120.60 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
116.23 Def for Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def + 161 HP for Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
117.16 Def for Cresselia (Confusion) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia (Psycho Cut) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
125.53 Def + 161 HP for Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Cresselia (2v2)
116.50 Def + 155 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
116.91 Def + 155 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk (Bite) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 153 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk (Snarl) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 155 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
120.27 Def + 155 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
122.41 Def + 162 HP for Clefable (Pound) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 162 HP for Clefable (Zen Headbutt) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 159 HP for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 159 HP for Clefable (Moonblast) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 161 HP for Clefable (Draining Kiss) vs Clefable (0v1)
123.40 Def + 159 HP for Clefable (Meteor Mash) vs Clefable (0v1)
124.07 Def + 159 HP for Clefable (Psychic) vs Clefable (0v1)
124.68 Def + 161 HP for Clefable (Swift) vs Clefable (0v1)
125.91 Def + 158 HP for Clefable (Charm) vs Clefable (0v1)
116.48 Def + 154 HP for Runerigus (Brutal Swing) vs Runerigus (0v1)
116.96 Def + 153 HP for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (0v1)
117.02 Def + 154 HP for Runerigus (Sand Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v1)
117.56 Def + 154 HP for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v1)
124.76 Def + 154 HP for Runerigus (Astonish) vs Runerigus (0v1)
120.93 Def + 157 HP for Seaking (Megahorn) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
121.07 Def + 156 HP for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
121.61 Def + 156 HP for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
121.61 Def + 158 HP for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
122.31 Def + 162 HP for Seaking (Waterfall) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
124.53 Def + 157 HP for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
115.87 Def + 148 HP for Primarina (Moonblast) vs Primarina (1v1, 2v2)
116.43 Def + 149 HP for Primarina (Hydro Pump) vs Primarina (1v1)
117.04 Def + 150 HP for Primarina (Psychic) vs Primarina (1v1)
115.79 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
115.90 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.17 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.17 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
117.28 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
120.73 Def + 159 HP for Virizion (Close Combat) vs Virizion (1v0)
120.85 Def + 159 HP for Virizion (Leaf Blade) vs Virizion (1v0)
121.11 Def + 159 HP for Virizion (Stone Edge) vs Virizion (1v0)
121.54 Def + 159 HP for Virizion (Sacred Sword) vs Virizion (1v0)
121.54 Def + 162 HP for Virizion (Double Kick) vs Virizion (1v0)
123.27 Def + 160 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (1v0)
126.50 Def + 160 HP for Blastoise (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (1v0)
126.69 Def + 160 HP for Blastoise (Skull Bash) vs Blastoise (1v0)
117.89 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
117.89 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
117.89 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
118.38 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
118.59 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
118.65 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
128.70 Def for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (1v1, 2v2)
128.70 Def for Miltank (High Horsepower) vs Miltank (1v1, 2v2)

Anchors we get for free (27 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

191.34 Atk for Florges (Blizzard) vs Florges (1v2)
192.26 Atk for Florges (Waterfall) vs Florges (1v2)
193.86 Atk for Florges (Hydro Cannon) vs Florges (1v2)
191.76 Atk for Cramorant (Hydro Cannon) vs Cramorant (2v2)
192.31 Atk for Cramorant (Blizzard) vs Cramorant (2v2)
191.27 Atk for Cresselia (Blizzard) vs Cresselia (0v0)
192.60 Atk for Cresselia (Hydro Cannon) vs Cresselia (0v0)
193.20 Atk for Cresselia (Waterfall) vs Cresselia (0v0)
191.51 Atk for Talonflame (Blizzard) vs Talonflame (1v1)
191.73 Atk for Talonflame (Hydro Cannon) vs Talonflame (1v1)
191.21 Atk for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (2v1)
192.88 Atk for Walrein (Waterfall) vs Walrein (2v1)
193.22 Atk for Walrein (Hydro Cannon) vs Walrein (2v1)
191.78 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
192.20 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Blizzard) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
191.99 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Blizzard) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1)
192.32 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1)
191.59 Atk for Bellibolt (Blizzard) vs Bellibolt (2v2)
193.08 Atk for Bellibolt (Hydro Cannon) vs Bellibolt (2v2)
191.18 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Waterfall) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
191.37 Atk for Snorlax (Hydro Cannon) vs Snorlax (2v2)
191.79 Atk for Snorlax (Blizzard) vs Snorlax (2v2)
192.42 Atk for Dusknoir (Hydro Cannon) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
193.04 Atk for Dusknoir (Blizzard) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
192.59 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
191.76 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
191.76 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Blizzard) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

116.21 Def + 151 HP flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v0) [3651 IVs]
116.21 Def + 148 HP flips Giratina (Altered) (0v0) [4074 IVs]

Member IVs (1)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
0/15/3 👑	194.11	129.02	154	#90	+0	+0.9	+7.4	-6.6

Atk 205+ · atk≥204.58 (17 IV spreads) (−331 vs Primarina Atk (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 46 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Bellibolt, Blastoise, Shadow Corviknight, Shadow Cradily, +16 more. Matchup flips vs Blastoise (1 scenario, 17 IVs).

197.53 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
197.72 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Blizzard) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
198.15 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Waterfall) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
191.34 Atk for Florges (Blizzard) vs Florges (1v2)
192.26 Atk for Florges (Waterfall) vs Florges (1v2)
193.86 Atk for Florges (Hydro Cannon) vs Florges (1v2)
191.76 Atk for Cramorant (Hydro Cannon) vs Cramorant (2v2)
192.31 Atk for Cramorant (Blizzard) vs Cramorant (2v2)
195.25 Atk for Cramorant (Waterfall) vs Cramorant (2v2)
195.91 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Hydro Cannon) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
196.78 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
201.59 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Blizzard) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0)
201.93 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0)
198.31 Atk for Registeel (Waterfall) vs Registeel (1v0)
198.66 Atk for Registeel (Hydro Cannon) vs Registeel (1v0)
200.17 Atk for Blastoise (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (2v1)
201.10 Atk for Blastoise (Blizzard) vs Blastoise (2v1)
203.13 Atk for Blastoise (Waterfall) vs Blastoise (2v1)
191.27 Atk for Cresselia (Blizzard) vs Cresselia (0v0)
192.60 Atk for Cresselia (Hydro Cannon) vs Cresselia (0v0)
193.20 Atk for Cresselia (Waterfall) vs Cresselia (0v0)
191.51 Atk for Talonflame (Blizzard) vs Talonflame (1v1)
191.73 Atk for Talonflame (Hydro Cannon) vs Talonflame (1v1)
191.21 Atk for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (2v1)
192.88 Atk for Walrein (Waterfall) vs Walrein (2v1)
193.22 Atk for Walrein (Hydro Cannon) vs Walrein (2v1)
201.55 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Waterfall) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
202.71 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Blizzard) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
203.23 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Hydro Cannon) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
191.78 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
192.20 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Blizzard) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
201.79 Atk for Primarina (Blizzard) vs Primarina (0v0)
202.56 Atk for Primarina (Hydro Cannon) vs Primarina (0v0)
191.99 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Blizzard) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1)
192.32 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1)
191.59 Atk for Bellibolt (Blizzard) vs Bellibolt (2v2)
193.08 Atk for Bellibolt (Hydro Cannon) vs Bellibolt (2v2)
198.25 Atk for Bellibolt (Waterfall) vs Bellibolt (2v2)
191.18 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Waterfall) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
191.37 Atk for Snorlax (Hydro Cannon) vs Snorlax (2v2)
191.79 Atk for Snorlax (Blizzard) vs Snorlax (2v2)
192.42 Atk for Dusknoir (Hydro Cannon) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
193.04 Atk for Dusknoir (Blizzard) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
192.59 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
191.76 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
191.76 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Blizzard) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)

Anchors we get for free (68 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

115.80 Def + 158 HP for Tinkaton bulk (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
116.17 Def + 158 HP for Tinkaton bulk (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
116.75 Def + 157 HP for Tinkaton bulk (Bulldoze) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
117.58 Def + 157 HP for Tinkaton bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
115.79 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Waterfall) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.19 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.31 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.60 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
117.09 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Blizzard) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
117.58 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Drill Peck) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.11 Def + 163 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
116.75 Def + 163 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
116.75 Def + 163 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
115.94 Def + 160 HP for Florges bulk (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (0v2)
116.22 Def + 160 HP for Florges bulk (Trailblaze) vs Florges (0v2)
116.53 Def + 160 HP for Florges bulk (Moonblast) vs Florges (0v2)
116.82 Def + 160 HP for Florges bulk (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (0v2)
117.34 Def + 160 HP for Florges bulk (Psychic) vs Florges (0v2)
117.34 Def + 160 HP for Florges bulk (Chilling Water) vs Florges (0v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres bulk (Sucker Punch) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres bulk (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres bulk (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.95 Def + 149 HP for Galarian Moltres bulk (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
117.53 Def + 149 HP for Galarian Moltres bulk (Ancient Power) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.91 Def + 163 HP for Jellicent bulk (Shadow Ball) vs Jellicent (2v0)
116.00 Def + 157 HP for Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.12 Def + 157 HP for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.32 Def + 157 HP for Lapras bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 157 HP for Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 157 HP for Lapras bulk (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 157 HP for Lapras bulk (Surf) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.23 Def for Dondozo bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (2v1)
116.55 Def for Dondozo bulk (Surf) vs Dondozo (2v1)
117.15 Def for Dondozo bulk (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (2v1)
117.31 Def for Dondozo bulk (Outrage) vs Dondozo (2v1)
115.93 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
116.61 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.29 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.49 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.49 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
115.93 Def + 160 HP for Forretress bulk (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v0)
116.19 Def + 160 HP for Forretress bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (0v0)
116.74 Def + 160 HP for Forretress bulk (Sand Tomb) vs Forretress (0v0)
117.21 Def + 160 HP for Forretress bulk (Volt Switch) vs Forretress (0v0)
116.23 Def for Cresselia bulk (Aurora Beam) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia bulk (Grass Knot) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia bulk (Confusion) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia bulk (Psycho Cut) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia bulk (Future Sight) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
116.50 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk bulk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
116.91 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk bulk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk bulk (Bite) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk bulk (Snarl) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk bulk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
116.48 Def + 158 HP for Runerigus bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Runerigus (0v1)
116.96 Def + 158 HP for Runerigus bulk (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (0v1)
117.02 Def + 158 HP for Runerigus bulk (Sand Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v1)
117.56 Def + 158 HP for Runerigus bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v1)
115.87 Def + 148 HP for Primarina bulk (Moonblast) vs Primarina (1v1, 2v2)
116.43 Def + 149 HP for Primarina bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Primarina (1v1)
117.04 Def + 150 HP for Primarina bulk (Psychic) vs Primarina (1v1)
115.79 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Cradily bulk (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
115.90 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily bulk (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.17 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Cradily bulk (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.17 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Cradily bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
117.28 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily bulk (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.07 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

194.20 Atk flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v0) [3787 IVs]
191.34 Atk flips Steelix (0v0) [4090 IVs]
191.34 Atk flips Toucannon (2v2) [4090 IVs]
197.15 Atk flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v0) [2573 IVs]

Member IVs (17)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/2/0 👑	204.71	119.31	150	#3721	+0	-24.5	-7.2	-8.1
15/2/1 👑	204.83	118.85	150	#3822	+0	-24.2	-7.5	-8.5
14/0/2 👑	204.71	118.04	151	#3837	+0	-24.8	-8.2	-7.8
15/3/0 👑	204.83	119.48	149	#3862	+0	-25.3	-7.8	-9.1
14/1/0	204.71	118.68	150	#3871	+0	-25.5	-7.7	-8.6
14/1/1	204.71	118.68	150	#3872	+0	-25.5	-7.7	-8.6
15/0/3 👑	204.83	117.59	151	#3920	+0	-25.2	-8.7	-9.2
15/1/1	204.83	118.22	150	#3926	+0	-25.7	-8.3	-8.7
15/1/2	204.83	118.22	150	#3927	+0	-25.7	-8.3	-8.7
13/0/0	204.58	118.50	150	#3943	+0	-26.1	-10.9	-9.3
15/2/0	204.83	118.85	149	#3947	+0	-26.3	-8.3	-9.0
15/0/0 👑	205.62	118.04	150	#3969	+0	-25.5	-9.4	-8.8
14/0/0	204.71	118.04	150	#4007	+0	-27.0	-9.1	-9.3
14/0/1	204.71	118.04	150	#4008	+0	-27.0	-9.1	-9.3
15/1/0	204.83	118.22	149	#4027	+0	-26.8	-9.4	-9.1
15/0/1	204.83	117.59	150	#4060	+0	-27.4	-9.6	-10.8
15/0/2	204.83	117.59	150	#4061	+0	-27.4	-9.6	-10.8

Fortified Jellicent · def≥127.10, hp≥154 (54 IV spreads) (−4034 vs General (def-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 135 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Shadow Ampharos, Blastoise, Clefable, Shadow Cradily, +20 more. Matchup flips vs Guzzlord (1 scenario, 132 IVs).

115.80 Def + 154 HP for Tinkaton (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
116.17 Def + 153 HP for Tinkaton (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
116.75 Def + 153 HP for Tinkaton (Bulldoze) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
117.58 Def + 154 HP for Tinkaton (Flash Cannon) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
119.41 Def + 156 HP for Tinkaton (Rock Smash) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
119.72 Def + 153 HP for Tinkaton (Heavy Slam) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
119.17 Def for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
119.34 Def for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
119.93 Def for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
120.62 Def for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
121.19 Def for Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
123.36 Def for Empoleon (Metal Claw) vs Empoleon (1v1)
123.36 Def for Empoleon (Metal Sound) vs Empoleon (1v1)
115.79 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.19 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.31 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.60 Def + 153 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
117.09 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
117.58 Def + 154 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.11 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
116.75 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
116.75 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
124.53 Def for Mimikyu (Shadow Claw) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
124.53 Def for Mimikyu (Hex) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
115.94 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (0v2)
116.22 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Trailblaze) vs Florges (0v2)
116.53 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Moonblast) vs Florges (0v2)
116.82 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (0v2)
117.34 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Psychic) vs Florges (0v2)
117.34 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Chilling Water) vs Florges (0v2)
125.16 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Vine Whip) vs Florges (0v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres (Sucker Punch) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.95 Def + 149 HP for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
117.53 Def + 149 HP for Galarian Moltres (Ancient Power) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
124.15 Def + 162 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Bite) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.15 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.15 Def + 162 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.15 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.70 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.79 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
116.91 Def + 159 HP for Jellicent (Shadow Ball) vs Jellicent (2v0)
117.63 Def + 159 HP for Jellicent (Surf) vs Jellicent (1v0, 2v0)
118.98 Def + 161 HP for Jellicent (Bubble Beam) vs Jellicent (2v0)
119.80 Def + 160 HP for Jellicent (Ice Beam) vs Jellicent (2v0)
123.01 Def + 150 HP for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (1v1 with bait)
123.78 Def + 150 HP for Guzzlord (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (1v1 with bait)
127.03 Def + 160 HP for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (1v1 with bait)
116.00 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.12 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.32 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Surf) vs Lapras (1v0)
118.52 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v0)
122.47 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Ice Shard) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.23 Def + 159 HP for Dondozo (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
116.55 Def + 159 HP for Dondozo (Surf) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
117.15 Def + 159 HP for Dondozo (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
117.31 Def + 159 HP for Dondozo (Outrage) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
119.66 Def for Dondozo (Waterfall) vs Dondozo (2v1)
115.93 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
116.61 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.29 Def + 157 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.49 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.49 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
118.16 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Feint Attack) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
118.16 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Charm) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
118.69 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
115.93 Def + 148 HP for Forretress (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
116.19 Def + 155 HP for Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
116.74 Def + 154 HP for Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
117.21 Def + 149 HP for Forretress (Volt Switch) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
118.87 Def + 159 HP for Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
118.87 Def + 159 HP for Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Forretress (0v0)
116.07 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
119.12 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
119.12 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
120.60 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
116.23 Def for Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def + 161 HP for Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
117.16 Def for Cresselia (Confusion) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia (Psycho Cut) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
125.53 Def + 161 HP for Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Cresselia (2v2)
116.50 Def + 155 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
116.91 Def + 155 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk (Bite) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 155 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk (Snarl) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 155 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
120.27 Def + 155 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
122.41 Def + 162 HP for Clefable (Pound) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 162 HP for Clefable (Zen Headbutt) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 161 HP for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 161 HP for Clefable (Moonblast) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 161 HP for Clefable (Draining Kiss) vs Clefable (0v1)
123.40 Def + 162 HP for Clefable (Meteor Mash) vs Clefable (0v1)
124.07 Def + 162 HP for Clefable (Psychic) vs Clefable (0v1)
124.68 Def + 161 HP for Clefable (Swift) vs Clefable (0v1)
125.91 Def + 158 HP for Clefable (Charm) vs Clefable (0v1)
116.48 Def + 154 HP for Runerigus (Brutal Swing) vs Runerigus (0v1)
116.96 Def + 153 HP for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (0v1)
117.02 Def + 154 HP for Runerigus (Sand Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v1)
117.56 Def + 155 HP for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v1)
124.76 Def + 154 HP for Runerigus (Astonish) vs Runerigus (0v1)
120.93 Def + 159 HP for Seaking (Megahorn) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
121.07 Def + 157 HP for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
121.61 Def + 163 HP for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
121.61 Def + 158 HP for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
122.31 Def + 162 HP for Seaking (Waterfall) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
124.53 Def + 157 HP for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
115.87 Def + 148 HP for Primarina (Moonblast) vs Primarina (1v1, 2v2)
116.43 Def + 149 HP for Primarina (Hydro Pump) vs Primarina (1v1)
117.04 Def + 150 HP for Primarina (Psychic) vs Primarina (1v1)
115.79 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
115.90 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.17 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.17 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
117.28 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
120.73 Def + 159 HP for Virizion (Close Combat) vs Virizion (1v0)
120.85 Def + 159 HP for Virizion (Leaf Blade) vs Virizion (1v0)
121.11 Def + 159 HP for Virizion (Stone Edge) vs Virizion (1v0)
121.54 Def + 160 HP for Virizion (Sacred Sword) vs Virizion (1v0)
121.54 Def + 162 HP for Virizion (Double Kick) vs Virizion (1v0)
123.27 Def + 160 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (1v0)
126.50 Def + 160 HP for Blastoise (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (1v0)
126.69 Def + 160 HP for Blastoise (Skull Bash) vs Blastoise (1v0)
117.89 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
117.89 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
117.89 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
118.38 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
118.59 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
118.65 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)

Anchors we get for free (13 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

191.34 Atk for Florges (Blizzard) vs Florges (1v2)
191.76 Atk for Cramorant (Hydro Cannon) vs Cramorant (2v2)
191.27 Atk for Cresselia (Blizzard) vs Cresselia (0v0)
191.51 Atk for Talonflame (Blizzard) vs Talonflame (1v1)
191.73 Atk for Talonflame (Hydro Cannon) vs Talonflame (1v1)
191.21 Atk for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (2v1)
191.78 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
191.59 Atk for Bellibolt (Blizzard) vs Bellibolt (2v2)
191.18 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Waterfall) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
191.37 Atk for Snorlax (Hydro Cannon) vs Snorlax (2v2)
191.79 Atk for Snorlax (Blizzard) vs Snorlax (2v2)
191.76 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
191.76 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Blizzard) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

116.21 Def + 151 HP flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v0) [3651 IVs]
116.21 Def + 148 HP flips Giratina (Altered) (0v0) [4074 IVs]

Member IVs (54)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
0/15/12 👑	191.91	127.56	159	#28	+1	-0.8	-1.3	-0.5
0/14/10 👑	192.65	127.41	158	#38	+3	-2.9	+7.2	-2.3
0/13/8 👑	193.38	127.26	157	#55	+4	-1.5	+4.0	-4.2
0/14/7 👑	193.38	127.90	156	#67	+0	-1.9	+6.3	-4.8
0/15/3 👑	194.11	129.02	154	#90	+0	+0.9	+7.4	-6.6
2/15/8 👑	193.74	127.56	156	#91	+0	+1.4	+5.3	-4.1
0/15/9 👑	192.65	128.05	157	#101	+0	-3.2	+6.5	-6.2
1/15/10 👑	192.83	127.56	157	#127	+1	-3.5	+6.7	-5.6
0/15/11	191.91	127.56	158	#157	-2	-3.4	-2.9	+0.0
0/14/9	192.65	127.41	157	#169	+0	-4.0	+5.9	-6.3
1/14/8	193.57	127.41	156	#176	+0	-2.9	+5.3	-4.1
0/15/5 👑	193.38	128.54	155	#186	+0	-3.6	+5.2	-5.2
0/15/6 👑	193.38	128.54	155	#187	+0	-3.6	+5.2	-5.2
0/15/8	192.65	128.05	156	#314	+0	-5.2	+5.2	-7.0
0/12/6 👑	194.11	127.10	156	#332	+0	-1.8	+2.5	-9.4
0/13/7	193.38	127.26	156	#350	+0	-5.4	+2.0	-4.5
2/14/6 👑	194.49	127.41	155	#369	+0	-2.0	+2.9	-9.2
0/13/5	194.11	127.74	155	#372	+0	-2.1	+4.6	-11.0
1/14/5 👑	194.30	127.90	155	#384	+0	-1.8	+4.9	-10.4
2/15/7	193.74	127.56	155	#397	+0	-2.4	+4.1	-11.1
1/15/4 👑	194.30	128.54	154	#401	+0	-1.4	+4.9	-8.3
1/13/3 👑	195.04	127.74	154	#426	+0	-0.8	+5.0	-13.2
1/15/6 👑	193.57	128.05	155	#434	+0	-5.4	+4.6	-10.9
1/15/7 👑	193.57	128.05	155	#435	+0	-5.4	+4.6	-10.9
0/14/3	194.11	128.38	154	#460	+0	-1.9	+4.6	-10.0
0/14/4	194.11	128.38	154	#461	+0	-1.9	+4.6	-10.0
1/15/8	192.83	127.56	156	#476	+0	-5.2	+4.2	-6.0
1/15/9	192.83	127.56	156	#477	+0	-5.2	+4.2	-6.0
0/15/10	191.91	127.56	157	#516	-5	-4.6	-3.8	-7.2
0/14/5	193.38	127.90	155	#522	+0	-5.7	+4.2	-11.3
0/14/6	193.38	127.90	155	#523	+0	-5.7	+4.2	-11.3
0/12/3	194.84	127.58	154	#535	+0	-2.0	+4.6	-13.7
1/14/6	193.57	127.41	155	#542	+0	-6.1	+2.1	-11.1
1/14/7	193.57	127.41	155	#543	+0	-6.1	+2.1	-11.1
1/13/5	194.30	127.26	155	#555	+0	-2.7	-0.6	-10.7
1/13/6	194.30	127.26	155	#556	+0	-2.7	-0.6	-10.7
3/15/6	194.66	127.56	154	#573	+0	-2.6	+4.5	-13.8
0/15/4	193.38	128.54	154	#586	+0	-5.3	+4.2	-10.2
2/13/4 👑	195.23	127.26	154	#607	+0	-1.6	-0.2	-13.2
0/12/5	194.11	127.10	155	#615	+0	-3.1	-0.7	-11.5
2/15/5 👑	194.49	128.05	154	#663	+0	-2.6	+4.4	-14.3
0/14/8	192.65	127.41	156	#670	+0	-6.4	+3.9	-6.7
0/13/3	194.11	127.74	154	#702	+0	-3.3	+4.3	-16.0
0/13/4	194.11	127.74	154	#703	+0	-3.3	+4.3	-16.0
2/14/5	194.49	127.41	154	#705	+0	-3.2	+2.5	-14.5
0/13/6	193.38	127.26	155	#713	+0	-6.7	-1.2	-11.5
2/15/6	193.74	127.56	154	#736	+0	-3.6	+3.8	-16.2
1/12/3	195.04	127.10	154	#740	+0	-5.4	-0.2	-13.7
1/12/4	195.04	127.10	154	#741	+0	-5.4	-0.2	-13.7
1/14/4	194.30	127.90	154	#744	+0	-3.1	+3.9	-15.6
… 4 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Fortified Forretress · def≥125.17, hp≥156 (202 IV spreads)

Clears 130 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Shadow Ampharos, Blastoise, Clefable, Shadow Cradily, +20 more. Matchup flips vs Forretress (1 scenario, 202 IVs).

115.80 Def + 154 HP for Tinkaton (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
116.17 Def + 154 HP for Tinkaton (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
116.75 Def + 153 HP for Tinkaton (Bulldoze) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
117.58 Def + 154 HP for Tinkaton (Flash Cannon) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
119.41 Def + 156 HP for Tinkaton (Rock Smash) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
119.72 Def + 153 HP for Tinkaton (Heavy Slam) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
119.17 Def for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
119.34 Def for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
119.93 Def for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
120.62 Def for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
121.19 Def for Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Empoleon (1v1, 2v2)
123.36 Def for Empoleon (Metal Claw) vs Empoleon (1v1)
123.36 Def for Empoleon (Metal Sound) vs Empoleon (1v1)
115.79 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.19 Def + 155 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.31 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.60 Def + 155 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
117.09 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
117.58 Def + 156 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.11 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
116.75 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
116.75 Def + 161 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
124.53 Def for Mimikyu (Shadow Claw) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
124.53 Def for Mimikyu (Hex) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
115.94 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (0v2)
116.22 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Trailblaze) vs Florges (0v2)
116.53 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Moonblast) vs Florges (0v2)
116.82 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (0v2)
117.34 Def + 157 HP for Florges (Psychic) vs Florges (0v2)
117.34 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Chilling Water) vs Florges (0v2)
125.16 Def + 154 HP for Florges (Vine Whip) vs Florges (0v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres (Sucker Punch) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.59 Def + 148 HP for Galarian Moltres (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
116.95 Def + 149 HP for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
117.53 Def + 149 HP for Galarian Moltres (Ancient Power) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 1v1, 2v2)
124.15 Def + 162 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Bite) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.15 Def + 162 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.15 Def + 162 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.15 Def + 162 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.70 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
124.79 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v1)
116.91 Def + 160 HP for Jellicent (Shadow Ball) vs Jellicent (2v0)
117.63 Def + 161 HP for Jellicent (Surf) vs Jellicent (2v0)
118.98 Def + 161 HP for Jellicent (Bubble Beam) vs Jellicent (2v0)
119.80 Def + 160 HP for Jellicent (Ice Beam) vs Jellicent (2v0)
116.00 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.12 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.32 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.64 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Surf) vs Lapras (1v0)
118.52 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v0)
122.47 Def + 154 HP for Lapras (Ice Shard) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.23 Def + 159 HP for Dondozo (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
116.55 Def + 160 HP for Dondozo (Surf) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
117.15 Def + 159 HP for Dondozo (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
117.31 Def + 159 HP for Dondozo (Outrage) vs Dondozo (2v1, 2v2)
119.66 Def for Dondozo (Waterfall) vs Dondozo (2v1)
115.93 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
116.61 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.29 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.49 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
117.49 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
118.16 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Feint Attack) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
118.16 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Charm) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
118.69 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
115.93 Def + 148 HP for Forretress (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
116.19 Def + 157 HP for Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (0v0)
116.74 Def + 159 HP for Forretress (Sand Tomb) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
117.21 Def + 149 HP for Forretress (Volt Switch) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
118.87 Def + 159 HP for Forretress (Heavy Slam) vs Forretress (0v0, 2v2)
118.87 Def + 159 HP for Forretress (Mirror Shot) vs Forretress (0v0)
116.07 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
119.12 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
119.12 Def + 149 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
120.60 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Breath) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)
116.23 Def for Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia (Confusion) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia (Psycho Cut) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
117.16 Def for Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Cresselia (0v0, 1v1)
116.50 Def + 156 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
116.91 Def + 157 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk (Bite) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 156 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Muk (Snarl) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
117.00 Def + 156 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
120.27 Def + 159 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (1v2)
122.41 Def + 162 HP for Clefable (Pound) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 162 HP for Clefable (Zen Headbutt) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 161 HP for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 161 HP for Clefable (Moonblast) vs Clefable (0v1)
122.41 Def + 161 HP for Clefable (Draining Kiss) vs Clefable (0v1)
123.40 Def + 162 HP for Clefable (Meteor Mash) vs Clefable (0v1)
124.07 Def + 162 HP for Clefable (Psychic) vs Clefable (0v1)
124.68 Def + 161 HP for Clefable (Swift) vs Clefable (0v1)
116.48 Def + 154 HP for Runerigus (Brutal Swing) vs Runerigus (0v1)
116.96 Def + 155 HP for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (0v1)
117.02 Def + 155 HP for Runerigus (Sand Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v1)
117.56 Def + 155 HP for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v1)
124.76 Def + 154 HP for Runerigus (Astonish) vs Runerigus (0v1)
120.93 Def + 159 HP for Seaking (Megahorn) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
121.07 Def + 159 HP for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
121.61 Def + 163 HP for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
121.61 Def + 163 HP for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
122.31 Def + 162 HP for Seaking (Waterfall) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
124.53 Def + 159 HP for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (1v0, 2v0)
115.87 Def + 148 HP for Primarina (Moonblast) vs Primarina (1v1, 2v2)
116.43 Def + 149 HP for Primarina (Hydro Pump) vs Primarina (1v1)
117.04 Def + 150 HP for Primarina (Psychic) vs Primarina (1v1)
115.79 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
115.90 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.17 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.17 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
117.28 Def + 150 HP for Shadow Cradily (Stone Edge) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
120.73 Def + 160 HP for Virizion (Close Combat) vs Virizion (1v0)
120.85 Def + 160 HP for Virizion (Leaf Blade) vs Virizion (1v0)
121.11 Def + 161 HP for Virizion (Stone Edge) vs Virizion (1v0)
121.54 Def + 160 HP for Virizion (Sacred Sword) vs Virizion (1v0)
121.54 Def + 162 HP for Virizion (Double Kick) vs Virizion (1v0)
123.01 Def + 162 HP for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (1v1 with bait)
123.78 Def + 162 HP for Guzzlord (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (1v1 with bait)
123.27 Def + 162 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (1v0)
117.89 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
117.89 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
117.89 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
118.38 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
118.59 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)
118.65 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

116.21 Def + 151 HP flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v0) [3651 IVs]
116.21 Def + 148 HP flips Giratina (Altered) (0v0) [4074 IVs]

Member IVs (202)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
2/13/14 👑	193.00	125.81	160	#6	+6	-1.0	+5.7	+0.9
2/14/13 👑	193.00	126.44	159	#13	+5	-1.9	+5.9	+2.1
3/13/15 👑	193.15	125.32	160	#15	+4	-2.4	+5.6	+0.8
0/13/11 👑	192.65	126.78	159	#16	+4	-2.4	+5.0	+1.9
1/15/14 👑	192.09	127.07	160	#19	+3	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
2/12/14	193.00	125.17	160	#20	+3	-2.8	+5.1	-1.1
2/12/15	193.00	125.17	160	#21	+3	-2.8	+5.1	-1.1
0/12/9 👑	193.38	126.62	158	#22	+5	-0.4	+5.0	-3.2
0/11/13	192.65	125.50	160	#25	+2	-2.8	+4.4	-0.6
1/11/11 👑	193.57	125.50	159	#26	+2	-0.3	+5.0	-4.0
2/15/15 👑	192.25	126.58	160	#27	+4	-0.8	-2.8	+0.5
0/15/12 👑	191.91	127.56	159	#28	+1	-0.8	-1.3	-0.5
3/15/10 👑	193.91	127.07	157	#29	+4	+1.9	+4.3	-4.1
3/12/13 👑	193.91	125.17	159	#33	+1	+2.0	+4.1	-4.5
0/15/14	191.17	127.07	160	#36	-1	-0.4	-1.1	-0.2
0/15/15	191.17	127.07	160	#37	-1	-0.4	-1.1	-0.2
0/14/10 👑	192.65	127.41	158	#38	+3	-2.9	+7.2	-2.3
0/12/15 👑	191.91	125.66	161	#39	+3	-1.5	-3.0	+0.2
3/14/14 👑	193.15	125.95	159	#42	+2	-2.7	+4.7	-2.7
4/14/15	193.30	125.45	159	#43	+2	-0.7	+4.6	-4.4
0/10/11	193.38	125.34	159	#45	+2	-0.9	+4.6	-4.4
2/13/13	193.00	125.81	159	#46	+1	-2.9	+4.7	-2.9
1/13/9	193.57	126.78	157	#48	+4	-1.9	+4.2	-4.1
1/14/14	192.09	126.44	160	#49	+3	-1.3	-3.4	-0.1
1/14/15	192.09	126.44	160	#50	+3	-1.3	-3.4	-0.1
1/13/12	192.83	126.29	159	#51	+3	-2.8	+4.6	-3.2
4/15/11 👑	194.06	126.58	157	#54	+3	+1.6	+3.9	-4.8
0/13/8 👑	193.38	127.26	157	#55	+4	-1.5	+4.0	-4.2
1/15/15	191.34	126.58	160	#57	+0	-1.6	-3.7	-0.3
0/11/7 👑	194.11	126.46	157	#60	+3	+1.2	+4.0	-4.8
3/14/10	193.91	126.44	157	#64	+3	+1.1	+3.8	-4.9
3/14/11	193.91	126.44	157	#65	+3	+1.1	+3.8	-4.9
0/12/8	193.38	126.62	157	#66	+4	-2.1	+3.7	-4.5
0/14/7 👑	193.38	127.90	156	#67	+0	-1.9	+6.3	-4.8
2/14/15	192.25	125.95	160	#68	+2	-1.7	-4.7	-0.5
0/12/11	192.65	126.14	159	#69	+1	-3.3	+3.9	-3.9
0/12/12	192.65	126.14	159	#70	+1	-3.3	+3.9	-3.9
0/14/14	191.17	126.44	160	#73	-1	-1.7	-4.6	-0.3
0/14/15	191.17	126.44	160	#74	-1	-1.7	-4.6	-0.3
0/13/14	191.91	126.29	160	#77	+3	-2.0	-4.1	-1.0
2/15/12 👑	193.00	127.07	158	#81	+3	-2.9	+5.1	-4.0
2/15/8 👑	193.74	127.56	156	#91	+0	+1.4	+5.3	-4.1
6/15/14 👑	194.34	125.58	158	#93	+0	+1.5	+3.3	-4.7
0/14/12	191.91	126.93	159	#94	-1	-2.5	-5.1	+1.0
0/14/13	191.91	126.93	159	#95	-1	-2.5	-5.1	+1.0
3/13/12 👑	193.91	125.81	158	#96	-1	+1.6	+3.1	-5.3
1/13/14	192.09	125.81	160	#97	-1	-2.3	-5.6	-1.3
1/13/15	192.09	125.81	160	#98	-1	-2.3	-5.6	-1.3
0/15/9 👑	192.65	128.05	157	#101	+0	-3.2	+6.5	-6.2
2/12/11	193.74	125.66	158	#103	-1	+1.4	+3.1	-5.3
… 152 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Primarina Atk · atk≥201.79 (348 IV spreads) (−3740 vs General (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 41 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Bellibolt, Blastoise, Shadow Corviknight, Shadow Cradily, +16 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Primarina (3 scenario flips).

197.53 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
197.72 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Blizzard) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
198.15 Atk for Shadow Corviknight (Waterfall) vs Shadow Corviknight (1v1)
191.34 Atk for Florges (Blizzard) vs Florges (1v2)
192.26 Atk for Florges (Waterfall) vs Florges (1v2)
193.86 Atk for Florges (Hydro Cannon) vs Florges (1v2)
191.76 Atk for Cramorant (Hydro Cannon) vs Cramorant (2v2)
192.31 Atk for Cramorant (Blizzard) vs Cramorant (2v2)
195.25 Atk for Cramorant (Waterfall) vs Cramorant (2v2)
195.91 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Hydro Cannon) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
196.78 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
201.59 Atk for Shadow Dusknoir (Blizzard) vs Shadow Dusknoir (0v0)
198.31 Atk for Registeel (Waterfall) vs Registeel (1v0)
198.66 Atk for Registeel (Hydro Cannon) vs Registeel (1v0)
200.17 Atk for Blastoise (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (2v1)
201.10 Atk for Blastoise (Blizzard) vs Blastoise (2v1)
191.27 Atk for Cresselia (Blizzard) vs Cresselia (0v0)
192.60 Atk for Cresselia (Hydro Cannon) vs Cresselia (0v0)
193.20 Atk for Cresselia (Waterfall) vs Cresselia (0v0)
191.51 Atk for Talonflame (Blizzard) vs Talonflame (1v1)
191.73 Atk for Talonflame (Hydro Cannon) vs Talonflame (1v1)
191.21 Atk for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (2v1)
192.88 Atk for Walrein (Waterfall) vs Walrein (2v1)
193.22 Atk for Walrein (Hydro Cannon) vs Walrein (2v1)
201.55 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Waterfall) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
191.78 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
192.20 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Blizzard) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
191.99 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Blizzard) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1)
192.32 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1)
191.59 Atk for Bellibolt (Blizzard) vs Bellibolt (2v2)
193.08 Atk for Bellibolt (Hydro Cannon) vs Bellibolt (2v2)
198.25 Atk for Bellibolt (Waterfall) vs Bellibolt (2v2)
191.18 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Waterfall) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
191.37 Atk for Snorlax (Hydro Cannon) vs Snorlax (2v2)
191.79 Atk for Snorlax (Blizzard) vs Snorlax (2v2)
192.42 Atk for Dusknoir (Hydro Cannon) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
193.04 Atk for Dusknoir (Blizzard) vs Dusknoir (1v1)
192.59 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)
201.79 Atk for Primarina (Blizzard) vs Primarina (0v0)
191.76 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
191.76 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Blizzard) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)

Anchors we get for free (17 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

115.80 Def + 158 HP for Tinkaton bulk (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
116.17 Def + 158 HP for Tinkaton bulk (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (1v2)
115.79 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Waterfall) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.19 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (0v0)
116.11 Def + 163 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
115.94 Def + 160 HP for Florges bulk (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (0v2)
116.00 Def + 157 HP for Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (1v0)
116.12 Def + 157 HP for Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (1v0)
115.93 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2)
115.93 Def + 160 HP for Forretress bulk (Earthquake) vs Forretress (0v0)
116.19 Def + 160 HP for Forretress bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Forretress (0v0)
115.87 Def + 148 HP for Primarina bulk (Moonblast) vs Primarina (1v1, 2v2)
115.79 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Cradily bulk (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
115.90 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Cradily bulk (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.17 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Cradily bulk (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.17 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Cradily bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
116.07 Def for Shadow Giratina Altered bulk (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v1 with bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

194.20 Atk flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v0) [3787 IVs]
191.34 Atk flips Steelix (0v0) [4090 IVs]
191.34 Atk flips Toucannon (2v2) [4090 IVs]
197.15 Atk flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (0v0) [2573 IVs]

Member IVs (348)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/1/6 👑	203.01	118.22	154	#2070	+0	-8.8	-8.2	-5.2
10/4/2 👑	201.82	121.04	152	#2127	+0	-11.5	-3.1	-9.2
10/0/6 👑	201.82	118.50	155	#2450	+0	-13.6	-7.7	-8.1
11/3/4 👑	201.97	119.95	153	#2468	+0	-10.8	-8.8	-11.2
12/0/9 👑	202.10	117.59	156	#2499	+0	-12.1	-7.8	-9.1
10/5/1 👑	201.82	121.68	151	#2503	+0	-11.5	-7.8	-11.7
11/0/7 👑	201.97	118.04	155	#2514	+0	-10.5	-9.1	-8.9
14/7/4 👑	202.33	121.06	151	#2602	+0	-11.0	-8.2	-11.9
14/2/9 👑	202.33	117.93	155	#2613	+0	-10.3	-9.4	-9.6
10/2/4	201.82	119.77	153	#2638	+0	-12.4	-8.6	-11.3
11/5/2 👑	201.97	121.22	151	#2685	+0	-11.1	-8.6	-11.9
13/3/7 👑	202.22	119.02	154	#2697	+0	-10.6	-8.6	-11.8
13/4/6 👑	202.22	119.65	153	#2772	+0	-10.9	-8.1	-14.1
14/1/7 👑	203.13	117.76	154	#2783	+0	-13.2	-9.7	-5.7
9/0/2 👑	202.43	119.40	153	#2794	+0	-11.0	-8.6	-13.7
13/1/9	202.22	117.76	155	#2807	+0	-10.5	-9.4	-9.6
12/2/6	202.10	118.85	154	#2834	+0	-11.0	-9.1	-11.9
15/0/9 👑	203.24	116.67	155	#2847	+0	-12.6	-10.2	-6.2
10/1/5 👑	201.82	119.13	154	#2859	+0	-12.1	-9.0	-11.7
14/3/8 👑	202.33	118.55	154	#2867	+0	-11.2	-8.7	-12.1
13/2/7	202.22	118.39	154	#2880	+0	-11.4	-8.7	-12.2
13/2/8	202.22	118.39	154	#2881	+0	-11.4	-8.7	-12.2
14/2/6 👑	203.13	118.39	153	#2883	+0	-17.1	-8.7	-8.3
12/1/4 👑	202.88	118.68	153	#2886	+0	-17.3	-8.9	-8.3
11/1/6	201.97	118.68	154	#2890	+0	-11.5	-9.2	-12.0
14/6/5 👑	202.33	120.44	152	#2905	+0	-14.0	-8.5	-9.3
12/3/5	202.10	119.48	153	#2925	+0	-11.1	-8.9	-14.1
11/4/3 👑	201.97	120.58	152	#2951	+0	-14.2	-8.7	-9.3
11/2/4	201.97	119.31	153	#2961	+0	-11.3	-9.0	-14.2
11/2/5	201.97	119.31	153	#2962	+0	-11.3	-9.0	-14.2
14/4/7	202.33	119.18	153	#3008	+0	-11.2	-8.8	-15.0
13/0/10 👑	202.22	117.13	156	#3012	+0	-13.2	-9.6	-9.4
14/5/3 👑	203.13	120.28	151	#3023	+0	-20.5	-9.5	-5.0
15/2/10 👑	202.44	117.46	155	#3047	+0	-11.1	-9.5	-12.7
9/1/1 👑	202.43	120.04	152	#3062	+0	-14.4	-8.8	-10.5
10/3/0 👑	202.59	120.87	151	#3068	+0	-21.3	-8.5	-11.3
15/1/12 👑	202.44	116.84	156	#3074	+0	-12.1	-10.2	-9.7
10/0/5	201.82	118.50	154	#3096	+0	-12.9	-9.2	-12.1
12/2/3 👑	202.88	119.31	152	#3105	+0	-19.6	-9.7	-7.1
10/4/1	201.82	121.04	151	#3120	+0	-18.4	-8.7	-11.9
10/3/2	201.82	120.41	152	#3160	+0	-15.7	-9.0	-9.3
10/3/3	201.82	120.41	152	#3161	+0	-15.7	-9.0	-9.3
13/0/4 👑	203.79	118.04	153	#3173	+0	-17.6	-8.4	-6.2
15/0/13 👑	202.44	116.21	157	#3175	-6	-13.9	-11.2	-10.2
14/1/9	202.33	117.30	155	#3179	+0	-11.3	-9.7	-13.2
14/1/10	202.33	117.30	155	#3180	+0	-11.3	-9.7	-13.2
15/1/8 👑	203.24	117.30	154	#3181	+0	-19.9	-9.1	-6.1
15/3/9	202.44	118.09	154	#3182	+0	-14.1	-8.8	-11.7
12/0/8	202.10	117.59	155	#3196	+0	-11.2	-9.8	-13.0
12/4/4	202.10	120.12	152	#3230	+0	-14.7	-9.1	-11.0
… 298 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

General · atk≥191.18, def≥115.79 (4088 IV spreads)

Clears 2 anchors across 2 shield scenarios, covering Shadow Cradily, Shadow Snorlax. Floor across 20 atk breakpoint opponents + 25 bulkpoint opponents. Clears the easiest anchor for every opponent.

115.79 Def + 151 HP for Shadow Cradily bulk (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (1v2)
191.18 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Waterfall) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Bellibolt (2v2)
vs Cramorant (2v2)
vs Cresselia (0v0)
vs Dusknoir (1v1)
vs Florges (1v2)
vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
vs Snorlax (2v2)
vs Steelix (0v0)
vs Talonflame (1v1)
vs Toucannon (2v2)
vs Walrein (2v1)
vs Shadow Walrein (1v0)

Member IVs (4088)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
1/8/15 👑	193.57	123.59	162	#1	+9	-1.8	+7.4	-3.8
3/11/14 👑	193.91	124.54	160	#2	+3	+3.3	+5.2	-0.5
1/11/15 👑	192.83	125.02	161	#3	+7	-1.2	+6.7	+0.8
0/9/15 👑	192.65	124.23	162	#4	+8	+2.4	+6.6	+0.1
0/9/12 👑	193.38	124.70	160	#5	+3	-0.3	+4.8	-0.9
2/13/14 👑	193.00	125.81	160	#6	+6	-1.0	+5.7	+0.9
2/10/14	193.74	124.39	160	#7	+3	-0.9	+5.2	-0.5
0/10/14	192.65	124.87	161	#8	+5	-1.6	+6.0	+0.0
0/2/14 👑	194.84	121.13	163	#9	+10	+0.7	+6.3	-6.1
0/4/15 👑	194.11	121.96	163	#10	+8	+0.6	+6.6	-6.5
2/9/15 👑	193.74	123.75	161	#11	+5	-0.0	+6.1	-5.0
1/9/13	193.57	124.23	160	#12	+3	-4.4	+5.1	-0.5
2/14/13 👑	193.00	126.44	159	#13	+5	-1.9	+5.9	+2.1
1/10/15	192.83	124.39	161	#14	+6	-2.1	+5.3	+0.8
3/13/15 👑	193.15	125.32	160	#15	+4	-2.4	+5.6	+0.8
0/13/11 👑	192.65	126.78	159	#16	+4	-2.4	+5.0	+1.9
0/8/13 👑	193.38	124.06	161	#17	+5	-3.5	+6.0	-4.7
0/3/15	194.11	121.32	163	#18	+6	-0.6	+5.7	-9.1
1/15/14 👑	192.09	127.07	160	#19	+3	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
2/12/14	193.00	125.17	160	#20	+3	-2.8	+5.1	-1.1
2/12/15	193.00	125.17	160	#21	+3	-2.8	+5.1	-1.1
0/12/9 👑	193.38	126.62	158	#22	+5	-0.4	+5.0	-3.2
0/9/14	192.65	124.23	161	#23	+5	-3.3	+4.7	+0.0
1/7/15	193.57	122.95	162	#24	+5	-3.4	+5.9	-8.6
0/11/13	192.65	125.50	160	#25	+2	-2.8	+4.4	-0.6
1/11/11 👑	193.57	125.50	159	#26	+2	-0.3	+5.0	-4.0
2/15/15 👑	192.25	126.58	160	#27	+4	-0.8	-2.8	+0.5
0/15/12 👑	191.91	127.56	159	#28	+1	-0.8	-1.3	-0.5
3/15/10 👑	193.91	127.07	157	#29	+4	+1.9	+4.3	-4.1
1/11/14	192.83	125.02	160	#30	+2	-3.3	+4.4	-1.8
1/2/15 👑	195.04	120.68	163	#31	+7	+0.3	+5.0	-6.1
3/12/15	193.15	124.69	160	#32	+1	-3.0	+4.7	-1.7
3/12/13 👑	193.91	125.17	159	#33	+1	+2.0	+4.1	-4.5
2/11/14	193.00	124.54	160	#34	+1	-3.2	+4.7	-1.7
2/11/15	193.00	124.54	160	#35	+1	-3.2	+4.7	-1.7
0/14/10 👑	192.65	127.41	158	#38	+3	-2.9	+7.2	-2.3
0/12/15 👑	191.91	125.66	161	#39	+3	-1.5	-3.0	+0.2
2/11/12	193.74	125.02	159	#40	+1	+1.8	+4.0	-4.6
2/11/13	193.74	125.02	159	#41	+1	+1.8	+4.0	-4.6
3/14/14 👑	193.15	125.95	159	#42	+2	-2.7	+4.7	-2.7
4/14/15	193.30	125.45	159	#43	+2	-0.7	+4.6	-4.4
1/8/14	193.57	123.59	161	#44	+3	-3.7	+5.2	-3.6
0/10/11	193.38	125.34	159	#45	+2	-0.9	+4.6	-4.4
2/13/13	193.00	125.81	159	#46	+1	-2.9	+4.7	-2.9
0/8/15	192.65	123.59	162	#47	+5	-5.6	+5.7	-6.3
1/13/9	193.57	126.78	157	#48	+4	-1.9	+4.2	-4.1
1/14/14	192.09	126.44	160	#49	+3	-1.3	-3.4	-0.1
1/14/15	192.09	126.44	160	#50	+3	-1.3	-3.4	-0.1
1/13/12	192.83	126.29	159	#51	+3	-2.8	+4.6	-3.2
0/11/15	191.91	125.02	161	#52	+1	-2.2	-4.0	-0.8
… 4038 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Per-matchup IV finder (71 specific matchups - e.g. "which IV beats a given opponent in a given shield?")

Collapsed by default. This is a per-(opponent, shield) lookup: each card is one matchup and the exact IV spreads that win it. For "what do I need vs threat X" use Threats where your build choice matters above, or paste your collection into the scatter. Composite cards (slayer ∩ tier) surface IVs that satisfy a slayer anchor and a stat-cutoff tier; pure slayer-archetype cards live in the Slayer Builds block below, pure tier cards in the Threshold Tiers above.

Show only notable categories (≤ 5% of cohort or ≤ 5 members). Uncheck to see every non-trivial intersection.

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Atk 205+ (17 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Atk 205+ · atk≥204.58

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +0.5, spread 0.4)

13/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 204.58, def 118.50, hp 150, SP #4056

One of 17 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Atk 205+ threshold (atk≥204.58). Trades mirror dominance (130/152 wins, vs 152/152 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Atk 205+ cutoff.

14/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 204.71, def 118.04, hp 150, SP #4082

14/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 204.71, def 118.04, hp 150, SP #4081

14/0/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 204.71, def 118.04, hp 151, SP #4004

14/1/0 heavy atk weight - atk 204.71, def 118.68, hp 150, SP #4028

14/1/1 heavy atk weight - atk 204.71, def 118.68, hp 150, SP #4027

14/2/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 204.71, def 119.31, hp 150, SP #3895

15/0/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 205.62, def 118.04, hp 150, SP #4040

15/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 204.83, def 117.59, hp 150, SP #4093

15/0/2 heavy atk weight - atk 204.83, def 117.59, hp 150, SP #4092

15/0/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 204.83, def 117.59, hp 151, SP #4055

15/1/0 heavy atk weight - atk 204.83, def 118.22, hp 149, SP #4096

15/1/1 heavy atk weight - atk 204.83, def 118.22, hp 150, SP #4069

15/1/2 heavy atk weight - atk 204.83, def 118.22, hp 150, SP #4068

15/2/0 heavy atk weight - atk 204.83, def 118.85, hp 149, SP #4080

15/2/1 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 204.83, def 118.85, hp 150, SP #3987

15/3/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 204.83, def 119.48, hp 149, SP #4019

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Atk 205+ (17 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Atk 205+ · atk≥204.58

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +0.5, spread 0.4)

13/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 204.58, def 118.50, hp 150, SP #4056

One of 17 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Atk 205+ threshold (atk≥204.58). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (130/130) AND clears the Atk 205+ cutoff - no tradeoff.