Shadow Walrein Ultra League IV Dive

Opponent list (63 mons)

Tinkaton, Corviknight, Snorlax (Shadow), Corviknight (Shadow), Melmetal, Virizion, Zygarde (Complete Forme), Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow), Mimikyu, Snorlax, Florges, Moltres (Galarian), Feraligatr (Shadow), Feraligatr, Jellicent, Giratina (Altered), Cramorant, Guzzlord, Skeledirge, Rillaboom, Lapras, Lapras (Shadow), Dusknoir, Ninetales (Alolan), Dondozo, Dusknoir (Shadow), Registeel, Blastoise, Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), Forretress, Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), Regidrago, Ninetales, Cresselia, Muk (Alolan), Clefable, Talonflame, Forretress (Shadow), Walrein, Walrein (Shadow), Deoxys (Defense), Runerigus, Steelix, Seaking, Cresselia (Shadow), Steelix (Shadow), Swampert, Toucannon, Milotic (Shadow), Primarina, Ampharos, Cradily (Shadow), Malamar (Shadow), Ampharos (Shadow), Talonflame (Shadow), Bellibolt, Seismitoad, Annihilape, Miltank, Forretress (Bug Bite), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)

Which one to build? [all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (105 spreads, Atk >= 174.498 and Def >= 124.10 and HP >= 193) guarantees 28 of the 56 decision matchups; Build 2 (123 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 22 others; Build 1 wide (1186 spreads) keeps 16 of Build 1's 28 guaranteed matchups and holds the standout.

Build criteria: the same control as the one in the scatter strip below; either handle moves both

Walrein (Shadow) running Powder Snow / Earthquake, Icicle Spear.

[all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (105 spreads, Atk >= 174.498 and Def >= 124.10 and HP >= 193) guarantees 28 of the 56 decision matchups; Build 2 (123 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 22 others; Build 1 wide (1186 spreads) keeps 16 of Build 1's 28 guaranteed matchups and holds the standout.

No single-stat line on this moveset.

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

Atk >= 174.498 and Def >= 124.10 and HP >= 193

105

28 of 56, 3 of them material; 21 hold under every opponent-IV mode

1v2 Feraligatr (outside 4%)

11: 0v0 Moltres (Galarian), 0v0 Feraligatr (Shadow), +9 more

1/12/6 (291 of 567 matchups)

What Build 1 guarantees (28 of 56), its 105 members

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (8)
- 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 48%; material
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 49%
- 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 55%
- 0v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 77%
- 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 78%
- 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 93%
- 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 95%
- 0v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 96%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
0v1 (2)
- 0v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 36%
- 0v1 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 47%
1v0 (2)
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 51%
- 1v0 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 60%
1v1 (5)
- 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 4%
- 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 43%; material
- 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 51%
- 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 91%
- 1v1 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 93%
1v2 (5)
- 1v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 4%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 37%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 86%
- 1v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 92%
- 1v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 96%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v2 (6)
- 2v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 39%
- 2v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 46%
- 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 84%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 89%

Members (105), highest stat product first

Build 1 wide

Atk >= 174.498 + Def/HP staircase (12 steps)

1186

16 of 56, 1 of them material; 10 hold under every opponent-IV mode

23: 0v0 Moltres (Galarian), 0v0 Feraligatr (Shadow), +21 more

What the wider rule keeps and gives up

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
193	121.66
194	120.6
195	119.5
196	119.58
197	119.57
198	119.58
199	119.58
200	119.58
201	119.5
202	119.5
203	119.5
204	119.6

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 105 spreads in 1186 of its own, and keeps 16 of Build 1's 28 guaranteed matchups (1 of them material).

The 12 it gives up out here: 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%), 1v1 Feraligatr (grid 7%) and 0v1 Florges (grid 37%), and 9 more.

It holds the standout below.

Build 2 (fork)

Atk >= 178.40 + Def/HP staircase (9 steps)

123

22 of 56, 2 of them material; 14 hold under every opponent-IV mode

2v2 Cresselia (outside 40%)

17: 0v0 Moltres (Galarian), 0v0 Dusknoir, +15 more

5/0/12 (288 of 567 matchups)

What Build 2 guarantees (22 of 56), its steps and its 123 members

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
194	120.6
195	119.5
196	118.6
197	118.6
198	117.5
199	116.64
200	116.64
201	115.7
202	115

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (8)
- 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 48%; material
- 0v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 71%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 77%
- 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 78%
- 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 83%
- 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 93%
- 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 95%
- 0v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 96%
0v1 (1)
- 0v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 77%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
1v0 (2)
- 1v0 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 65%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
1v1 (3)
- 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 91%
- 1v1 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 93%
1v2 (4)
- 1v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 69%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 86%
- 1v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 92%
- 1v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 96%
2v1 (1)
- 2v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 56%
2v2 (3)
- 2v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 40%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 89%

Members (123), highest stat product first

Build 3 (bulk)

Def >= 124.20 and HP >= 196 (bulk box)

116

25 of 56, 1 of them material; 17 hold under every opponent-IV mode

1v2 Feraligatr (outside 3%)

14: 0v0 Mimikyu, 0v0 Feraligatr (Shadow), +12 more

0/15/15 (295 of 567 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 3 guarantees (25 of 56), its 116 members

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (6)
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 49%
- 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 55%
- 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 70%
- 0v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 77%
- 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 78%
- 0v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 96%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
0v1 (3)
- 0v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 14%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 36%
- 0v1 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 47%
1v0 (2)
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 51%
- 1v0 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 60%
1v1 (3)
- 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 4%
- 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 50%
- 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 91%
1v2 (5)
- 1v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 3%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 33%
- 1v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 36%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 86%
- 1v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 96%
2v2 (6)
- 2v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 32%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 39%
- 2v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 46%
- 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 84%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes

Members (116), highest stat product first

The two objectives disagree here: Build 3 (bulk)'s most-winning spread 0/15/15@39.5 wins 4 more matchups overall (295 against 291, of 567), while Build 1 (primary) guarantees 3 more of the 56 decision matchups (28 against 25).

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

Atk >= 174.498 and Def >= 124.10 and HP >= 193

105

19 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 28 of 56 overall, 3 of them material; 21 hold under every opponent-IV mode

1v2 Feraligatr (outside 4%)

11: 0v0 Moltres (Galarian), 0v0 Feraligatr (Shadow), +9 more

1/11/0 (100 of 189 matchups)

What Build 1 guarantees (19 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 28 of 56 overall), its 105 members

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (8)
- 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 48%; material
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 49%
- 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 55%
- 0v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 77%
- 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 78%
- 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 93%
- 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 95%
- 0v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 96%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
0v1 (2)
- 0v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 36%
- 0v1 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 47%
1v0 (2)
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 51%
- 1v0 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 60%
1v1 (5)
- 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 4%
- 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 43%; material
- 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 51%
- 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 91%
- 1v1 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 93%
1v2 (5)
- 1v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 4%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 37%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 86%
- 1v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 92%
- 1v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 96%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
2v2 (6)
- 2v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 39%
- 2v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 46%
- 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 84%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 89%

Members (105), highest stat product first

Build 1 wide

Atk >= 174.498 + Def/HP staircase (12 steps)

1186

13 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 16 of 56 overall, 1 of them material; 10 hold under every opponent-IV mode

23: 0v0 Moltres (Galarian), 0v0 Feraligatr (Shadow), +21 more

What the wider rule keeps and gives up

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
193	121.66
194	120.6
195	119.5
196	119.58
197	119.57
198	119.58
199	119.58
200	119.58
201	119.5
202	119.5
203	119.5
204	119.6

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 105 spreads in 1186 of its own, and keeps 13 of Build 1's 19 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (16 of its 28 overall, 1 of them material).

The 12 it gives up out here: 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%), 1v1 Feraligatr (grid 7%) and 0v1 Florges (grid 37%), and 9 more.

It holds the standout below.

Build 2 (fork)

Atk >= 178.40 and Def >= 119.58 and HP >= 194

15 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 22 of 56 overall, 1 of them material; 14 hold under every opponent-IV mode

2v2 Cresselia (outside 41%)

17: 0v0 Dondozo, 0v0 Walrein (Shadow), +15 more

4/3/1 (96 of 189 matchups)

What Build 2 guarantees (15 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 22 of 56 overall), its 71 members

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (9)
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 49%
- 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 71%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 71%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 77%
- 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 79%
- 0v0 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 83%
- 0v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 93%
- 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 95%
- 0v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 96%
0v1 (1)
- 0v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 77%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
1v0 (1)
- 1v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 65%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
1v1 (2)
- 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 91%
- 1v1 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 93%
1v2 (4)
- 1v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 70%; holds in 1 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 87%
- 1v2 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 92%
- 1v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 96%
2v1 (1)
- 2v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 57%
2v2 (4)
- 2v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 41%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 84%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 89%

Members (71), highest stat product first

Build 3 (bulk)

Def >= 124.20 and HP >= 196 (bulk box)

116

15 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 25 of 56 overall, 1 of them material; 17 hold under every opponent-IV mode

1v2 Feraligatr (outside 3%)

14: 0v0 Mimikyu, 0v0 Feraligatr (Shadow), +12 more

0/15/15 (100 of 189 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 3 guarantees (15 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 25 of 56 overall), its 116 members

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (6)
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 49%
- 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 55%
- 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 70%
- 0v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 77%
- 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 78%
- 0v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 96%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
0v1 (3)
- 0v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 14%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 36%
- 0v1 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 47%
1v0 (2)
- 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 51%
- 1v0 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 60%
1v1 (3)
- 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 4%
- 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 50%
- 1v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 91%
1v2 (5)
- 1v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 3%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 33%
- 1v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 36%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 86%
- 1v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 96%
2v2 (6)
- 2v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 32%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 39%
- 2v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 46%
- 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 84%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes

Members (116), highest stat product first

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 174.498 and Def >= 124.10 and HP >= 192	129	5 of 11 in 1v1 shields; 26 of 56 overall, 3 of them material; 20 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Feraligatr (outside 3%)	7: 0v0 Moltres (Galarian), 0v0 Ninetales, +5 more	1/12/6 (33 of 63 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (5 of 11 in 1v1 shields; 26 of 56 overall), its 129 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (8) 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 48%; material 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 49% 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 55% 0v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 77% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 35% 0v1 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 47% 1v0 (2) 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 51% 1v0 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 60% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 4% 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 42%; material 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 50% 1v2 (4) 1v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 3%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 86% 2v2 (5) 2v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 46% 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 84%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (129), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 174.498 and Def + 0.75*HP >= 265.89	1831	3 of 11 in 1v1 shields; 14 of 56 overall, 1 of them material; 9 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	19: 0v0 Moltres (Galarian), 0v0 Dusknoir, +17 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 95% of the same spreads (74 extra, 21 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 129 spreads in 1831 of its own, and keeps 3 of Build 1's 5 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (14 of its 26 overall, 1 of them material). The 12 it gives up out here: 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%), 1v1 Feraligatr (grid 7%) and 0v1 Florges (grid 37%), and 9 more. It holds the standout below.
Build 2 (fork)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 431 spreads by list	431	3 of 11 in 1v1 shields; 17 of 56 overall, 1 of them material; 10 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (outside 44%)	16: 0v0 Dusknoir, 0v0 Dondozo, +14 more	2/1/0 (32 of 63 matchups)
What Build 2 guarantees (3 of 11 in 1v1 shields; 17 of 56 overall), its 431 members all inside attack IV 0-14, defense IV 0-15, HP IV 0-15; that box also holds 3409 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (8) 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 44%; material 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 68%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 75% 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 76% 1v0 (1) 1v0 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 (3) 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 46%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (3) 1v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 85% 2v2 (2) 2v2 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 80%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 88% Members (431), highest stat product first
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 124.20 and HP >= 196 (bulk box)	116	3 of 11 in 1v1 shields; 25 of 56 overall, 1 of them material; 17 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v2 Feraligatr (outside 3%)	8: 0v0 Mimikyu, 0v0 Ninetales, +6 more	1/12/6 (33 of 63 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (3 of 11 in 1v1 shields; 25 of 56 overall), its 116 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (6) 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 49% 0v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 55% 0v0 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 70% 0v0 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 77% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 14%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Florges (rank 12) -- outside 36% 0v1 Regidrago (rank 33) -- outside 47% 1v0 (2) 1v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 51% 1v0 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 60% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 4% 1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 50% 1v2 (5) 1v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 3%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 33% 1v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 36%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 86% 2v2 (6) 2v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 32%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 39% 2v2 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 46% 2v2 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes Members (116), highest stat product first

Rates: outside N% is the share of the spreads NOT in that build that win the same matchup anyway; grid N% (the Notable spreads list and the cards at the top of the page) is the share of all the spreads on the grid. Weight follows the rate: bold = fewer than half of them win it; bold and underlined = fewer than a quarter; bold, underlined and italic = fewer than a tenth; dim = more than nine in ten win it anyway.

Each build's guarantee list is sorted by outside rate: how often the spreads NOT in that build win the same matchup anyway. The lower the rate, the rarer the guarantee.

Against the 30 spreads the mirror-slayer protocol converges on for Walrein (Shadow) (neither attack-first nor bulk-first here), attack of 178.20 and up wins charge-move priority against 15 of them, and 178.49 and up against 25. Inside a build, take the highest attack you have: Build 2 clears the first cut with 123 of 123 and the second with 92; Build 1 and Build 3 clear neither with any.

Is mine in one of these?

Paste your Poke Genie CSV, or add one spread by hand, in Check my collection below; the answer comes back here, grouped by build, and your collection stays in your browser.

Shield scenario:

Y: Color:

Stat-product rank against matchups won with PvPoke-default opponent IVs at the league cap over the whole opponent pool and, with Shield scenario on all, every baked shield state -- the view the single-stat line in the expander below was derived on. The Shield scenario selector on this row is the section's own; the scatter's dropdowns and the opponent filter do not drive this panel.

SP1 0/15/15, 2/8/15

Notable spreads

Every single spread this page names, on one list: the spread that wins the most matchups, the one with the highest avg battle score, SP1, and each build's most-winning member. Entries whose decision-matchup wins overlap by 90% or more are merged, because two spreads that win the same matchups are one offer.

2/8/15 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios)

in: It is in none of the builds, though Build 1 wide holds it. Of the 40 decision matchups it wins, Build 1 guarantees 26 to every one of its 105 members.
vs Build 1: wins 14 it does not guarantee -- 2v2 Empoleon (Shadow) (grid 3%; 3% of members), 0v1 Empoleon (grid 6%; 3% of members) and 2v1 Melmetal (grid 7%; 0% of members),
loses: 2 of the 28 Build 1 guarantees -- 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%) and 1v1 Feraligatr (grid 7%)

What else is true of 2/8/15

No other spread on this grid wins all 40 of the decision matchups it wins.

0/15/15 -- Highest avg battle score (the scatter's own y axis) / Stat-product rank-1 (SP1) / Build 3's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 3, which guarantees 25 of the 35 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 2v2 Empoleon (Shadow) (grid 3%), 0v1 Empoleon (grid 6%) and 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%)

1/12/6 -- Build 1's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 1, which guarantees 28 of the 36 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%), 1v1 Feraligatr (grid 7%) and 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 12%)

5/0/12 -- Build 2's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 2, which guarantees 22 of the 31 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 2v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (grid 34%), 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (grid 35%) and 1v2 Tinkaton (grid 38%)

2/8/15 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios)

in: It is in none of the builds, though Build 1 wide holds it. Of the 40 decision matchups it wins, Build 1 guarantees 26 to every one of its 105 members.
vs Build 1: wins 14 it does not guarantee -- 2v2 Empoleon (Shadow) (grid 3%; 3% of members), 0v1 Empoleon (grid 6%; 3% of members) and 2v1 Melmetal (grid 7%; 0% of members),
loses: 2 of the 28 Build 1 guarantees -- 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%) and 1v1 Feraligatr (grid 7%)

What else is true of 2/8/15

No other spread on this grid wins all 40 of the decision matchups it wins.

0/15/15 -- Highest avg battle score (the scatter's own y axis) / Stat-product rank-1 (SP1) / Build 3's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 3, which guarantees 25 of the 35 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 2v2 Empoleon (Shadow) (grid 3%), 0v1 Empoleon (grid 6%) and 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%)

1/11/0 -- Build 1's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 1, which guarantees 28 of the 35 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%), 1v1 Feraligatr (grid 7%) and 1v1 Mimikyu (grid 15%)

4/3/1 -- Build 2's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 2, which guarantees 22 of the 30 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v1 Milotic (Shadow) (grid 31%), 2v2 Cresselia (grid 42%) and 1v1 Walrein (grid 44%)

2/8/15 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios)

in: It is in none of the builds, though Build 1 wide holds it. Of the 40 decision matchups it wins, Build 1 guarantees 24 to every one of its 129 members.
vs Build 1: wins 16 it does not guarantee -- 2v2 Empoleon (Shadow) (grid 3%; 3% of members), 0v1 Empoleon (grid 6%; 3% of members) and 2v1 Melmetal (grid 7%; 0% of members),
loses: 2 of the 26 Build 1 guarantees -- 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%) and 1v1 Feraligatr (grid 7%)

What else is true of 2/8/15

No other spread on this grid wins all 40 of the decision matchups it wins.

0/15/15 -- Highest avg battle score (the scatter's own y axis) / Stat-product rank-1 (SP1)

in: It is a member of Build 3, which guarantees 25 of the 35 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 2v2 Empoleon (Shadow) (grid 3%), 0v1 Empoleon (grid 6%) and 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%)

1/12/6 -- Build 1's most-winning member / Build 3's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 1, which guarantees 26 of the 36 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v2 Feraligatr (grid 6%), 1v1 Feraligatr (grid 7%) and 1v1 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 12%)

2/1/0 -- Build 2's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 2, which guarantees 17 of the 27 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v1 Milotic (Shadow) (grid 31%), 2v2 Cresselia (grid 42%) and 1v1 Walrein (grid 44%)

What to do with this: If you already have one of these spreads, build it: each is the top of this grid on the measure that named it. If you are hunting, hunt a build instead.

Rocket-grunt encounters (this is a shadow, so it cannot be traded) needed to meet one named spread out of the 4096 on this grid: 2839 for a 50% chance, 5678 for a 75% chance. Model: the grunt IV floor is not verified here, and the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid.

The single-stat line

4 of the 6 movesets on this page carry a line. This page is Powder Snow / Earthquake, Icicle Spear, and it carries no line; Powder Snow / Icicle Spear, Water Pulse is at least 119.66 defense; Powder Snow / Blizzard, Icicle Spear is at least 120.58 defense; Powder Snow / Earthquake, Water Pulse is at least 120.58 defense; Powder Snow / Icicle Spear is at least 179.41 attack; Waterfall / Earthquake, Icicle Spear carries no line.

Line: none
Closest: Def >= 119.66 (119.657) -- 2v2 Dondozo, rank 26, 100 spreads of 4096 on the wrong side
SP1: 0/15/15 -- wins 295 of 567
Alternative: Def >= 124.15, HP >= 192 (252 spreads, 6.2%)
Decision width: 1 matchup

No attack, defense or HP threshold decides a matchup for Walrein (Shadow) running Powder Snow / Earthquake, Icicle Spear in Ultra League; build for stat product. The closest thing to a line is 119.66 (119.657) defense in the 2v2 against Dondozo (rank 26). Every one of the 2179 spreads at or above it wins, and 100 of the 1917 below it win too. It is not a build line because 94.8% of the spreads below it lose, under the 97% a rule with one clean side needs, and 100 of 4096 spreads sit on the wrong side of it, over the 20 a near-exact rule allows.

What bulk does carry is 124.15 defense with 192 HP -- 252 spreads, 6.2% of the grid. They win 2 contested matchups -- 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15), 1v2 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- that at most 1% of the spreads outside them win. SP1, 0/15/15 at L39.5, wins 295 of its 567 matchups, and is inside that pair. The spread winning the most matchups on this grid is 2/8/15 with 296 of 567, so the whole IV decision here is 1 matchup wide.

rank-1

Shield scenario:

Why these regions

Why these regions and not others. The set panel below is every candidate region the builds were cut from. Under it, the same grid grouped by which contested matchups a spread wins -- its win/loss fingerprint, not its score -- drawn on the stat planes where a region is a shape; crossing a breakpoint or bulkpoint moves a spread to the next cluster.

The set panel (an UpSet plot: a bar chart of set intersections, Lex et al. 2014). Left: the named sets the lattice was built from (rows, labelled 'spreads in the set / decision matchups every member of it wins') and the candidate regions made by intersecting them (columns -- bar height is spreads, the number above it is decision matchups guaranteed in the shield scenarios this setting counts, and a coloured column is one of the builds in the table above). A dot means the region sits inside that row's set. The letters index THIS setting's own eight sets and are re-assigned when the Build criteria change, so compare the row names across Build criteria settings, not the letters.

clusters

Shield scenario:

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2359	180.1	118.5	193	#1017-#4096	9.0	-
C1	1737	175.8	121.8	197	#1-#2496	11.8	Ampharos (+85pp), Bellibolt (+84pp), Dusknoir (+76pp), Dondozo (+60pp); trades away Primarina (-100pp), Shadow Feraligatr (-48pp), Ninetales (-39pp), Clefable (-25pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Dusknoir	18%	94%
Shadow Walrein	25%	83%
Bellibolt	15%	99%
Dondozo	31%	91%
Primarina	100%	0%
Ampharos	4%	89%
Galarian Moltres	51%	99%
Shadow Feraligatr	92%	44%
Florges	61%	100%
Melmetal	63%	100%
Clefable	31%	6%
Ninetales	100%	61%
Seaking	0%	37%
Tinkaton	17%	0%
Walrein	100%	83%
Mimikyu	100%	90%
Lapras	94%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Dusknoir	50%	wins iff atk < 178.47	89%	named
Shadow Walrein	50%	wins iff sp >= 4,157,297	88%	named
Bellibolt	51%	wins iff atk < 177.67	91%	named
Dondozo	56%	wins iff def >= 119.66	95%	named
Primarina	57%	wins iff atk >= 177.73	100%	named
Ampharos	40%	wins iff atk < 177.60	94%	named
Galarian Moltres	71%	wins iff sp >= 4,125,174	93%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	72%	wins iff atk >= 176.29	90%	named
Florges	77%	wins iff sp >= 4,118,725	93%	named
Melmetal	79%	wins iff sp >= 4,112,972	95%	named
Clefable	20%	wins iff atk >= 180.93	98%	named
Ninetales	83%	wins iff atk >= 175.63	100%	named
Seaking	16%	wins iff sp >= 4,243,165	95%	named
Tinkaton	10%	wins iff atk >= 181.85	100%	named
Walrein	93%	wins iff atk >= 174.50	100%	named
Mimikyu	96%	wins iff atk >= 174.10	100%	named
Lapras	97%	wins iff sp >= 4,044,135	97%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	528	182.2	116.7	192	#2934-#4096	3.8	-
C1	1432	179.8	118.9	193	#1663-#3917	4.7	Annihilape (+100pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (+85pp); trades away Tinkaton (-59pp), Deoxys (Defense) (-40pp)
C2	2136	176.3	121.3	197	#1-#2673	5.2	Registeel (+100pp), Tinkaton (+91pp); trades away Cresselia (-66pp), Deoxys (Defense) (-60pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2
Registeel	0%	0%	100%
Tinkaton	65%	6%	97%
Cresselia	100%	100%	34%
Deoxys (Defense)	100%	60%	0%
Annihilape	0%	100%	100%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	15%	100%	100%
Shadow Malamar	100%	100%	90%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Registeel	52%	wins iff sp >= 4,165,257	95%	named
Tinkaton	61%	wins iff sp >= 4,164,582	86%	named
Cresselia	66%	wins iff atk >= 177.11	100%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	34%	wins iff atk >= 179.54	100%	named
Annihilape	87%	wins iff atk < 181.43	95%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	89%	wins iff sp >= 4,087,504	95%	named
Shadow Malamar	95%	wins iff atk >= 174.19	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2096	176.2	121.4	197	#1-#2676	4.5	-
C1	2000	180.5	118.3	193	#1583-#4096	4.8	Shadow Talonflame (+88pp), Shadow Cresselia (+64pp), Shadow Milotic (+63pp), Clefable (+36pp); trades away Tinkaton (-99pp), Walrein (-76pp), Mimikyu (-30pp), Shadow Snorlax (-24pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Tinkaton	100%	1%
Shadow Talonflame	10%	98%
Walrein	81%	5%
Shadow Cresselia	0%	64%
Shadow Milotic	0%	63%
Clefable	0%	36%
Mimikyu	30%	0%
Shadow Snorlax	24%	0%
Ninetales	0%	24%
Cramorant	100%	83%
Shadow Walrein	86%	100%
Feraligatr	14%	0%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Tinkaton	52%	wins iff sp >= 4,164,582	95%	named
Shadow Talonflame	53%	wins iff atk >= 178.06	100%	named
Walrein	44%	wins iff sp >= 4,170,190	85%	named
Shadow Cresselia	31%	wins iff atk >= 179.74	99%	named
Shadow Milotic	31%	wins iff atk >= 178.89	88%	named
Clefable	18%	wins iff atk >= 180.93	100%	named
Mimikyu	15%	wins iff sp >= 4,242,956	93%	named
Shadow Snorlax	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,251,575	94%	named
Ninetales	12%	wins iff atk >= 181.43	100%	named
Cramorant	92%	wins iff hp >= 190	94%	named
Shadow Walrein	93%	wins iff atk >= 174.50	100%	named
Feraligatr	7%	wins iff def >= 124.15	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	109	183.1	117.2	189	#3337-#4096	1.7	-
C1	2422	179.7	119.0	193	#654-#4077	4.0	Guzzlord (+99pp), Runerigus (+91pp), Cramorant (+89pp); trades away Swampert (-54pp)
C2	1565	175.8	121.5	198	#1-#2496	5.2	Tinkaton (+100pp), Giratina (Altered) (+92pp); trades away Alolan Ninetales (-59pp), Swampert (-19pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2
Tinkaton	0%	0%	100%
Giratina (Altered)	0%	0%	92%
Alolan Ninetales	88%	93%	34%
Swampert	73%	19%	0%
Cramorant	1%	90%	87%
Guzzlord	0%	99%	87%
Feraligatr	0%	0%	15%
Runerigus	6%	97%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Tinkaton	38%	wins iff sp >= 4,192,035	92%	named
Giratina (Altered)	35%	wins iff sp >= 4,200,584	91%	named
Alolan Ninetales	70%	wins iff atk >= 176.66	94%	named
Swampert	13%	wins iff atk >= 181.33	99%	named
Cramorant	87%	wins iff hp >= 190	90%	named
Guzzlord	92%	wins iff atk >= 174.15	97%	named
Feraligatr	6%	wins iff def >= 124.15	99%	named
Runerigus	96%	wins iff sp >= 4,055,024	97%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2796	179.6	119.1	194	#592-#4096	4.3	-
C1	1300	175.5	121.7	199	#1-#2297	7.0	Shadow Cresselia (+93pp), Rillaboom (+87pp), Swampert (+69pp), Blastoise (+39pp); trades away Cresselia (-61pp), Talonflame (-31pp), Walrein (-17pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Swampert	26%	94%
Dondozo	44%	80%
Cresselia	61%	0%
Rillaboom	13%	100%
Shadow Cresselia	4%	97%
Talonflame	31%	0%
Shadow Feraligatr	74%	100%
Alolan Muk	77%	99%
Blastoise	0%	39%
Walrein	95%	78%
Shadow Malamar	8%	0%
Shadow Empoleon	0%	10%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Swampert	48%	wins iff sp >= 4,199,791	78%	named
Dondozo	56%	wins iff def >= 119.66	98%	named
Cresselia	42%	wins iff atk >= 178.40	93%	named
Rillaboom	41%	wins iff sp >= 4,186,376	91%	named
Shadow Cresselia	34%	wins iff sp >= 4,200,584	92%	named
Talonflame	21%	wins iff atk >= 180.55	100%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	82%	wins iff hp >= 192	93%	named
Alolan Muk	84%	wins iff def >= 117.01	100%	named
Blastoise	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,251,575	93%	named
Walrein	90%	wins iff atk >= 174.50	96%	named
Shadow Malamar	5%	wins iff atk >= 182.53	100%	named
Shadow Empoleon	3%	wins iff hp >= 204	98%	named

all scenarios: 56 win/loss bits (one per contested opponent per scenario) concatenated across 5 of 9 shield scenarios (0v1, 0v2, 2v0, 2v1 excluded as degenerate); 700 distinct win patterns; K=2 clusters (silhouette 0.53); split at atk 178.51.

Sharpest single scenarios on this page: 1v0 shields (K=3, silhouette 0.76 over 7 contested opponents, split atk 178.38) and 1v2 shields (K=3, silhouette 0.68 over 8 contested opponents, split atk 177.44) -- pick them in the dropdown above.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1931	180.5	118.3	193	#1626-#4096	25.9	-
C1	2165	176.3	121.3	197	#1-#2770	32.0	Tinkaton [1v1] (+98pp), Registeel [1v0] (+95pp), Walrein [1v1] (+78pp), Tinkaton [1v0] (+78pp); trades away Shadow Talonflame [1v1] (-85pp), Primarina [0v0] (-80pp), Cresselia [2v2] (-73pp), Deoxys (Defense) [1v0] (-72pp)

Per-cluster win rates vs each contested opponent

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Dusknoir [0v0]	12%	84%
Shadow Walrein [0v0]	9%	86%
Bellibolt [0v0]	19%	79%
Tinkaton [1v1]	0%	98%
Registeel [1v0]	2%	97%
Swampert [2v2]	31%	62%
Shadow Talonflame [1v1]	98%	13%
Dondozo [2v2]	33%	76%
Walrein [1v1]	3%	81%
Dondozo [0v0]	29%	81%
Primarina [0v0]	100%	20%
Cresselia [2v2]	80%	7%
Rillaboom [2v2]	1%	76%
Ampharos [0v0]	0%	76%
Tinkaton [1v0]	20%	98%
Tinkaton [1v2]	0%	72%
Giratina (Altered) [1v2]	0%	66%
Cresselia [1v0]	100%	35%
Deoxys (Defense) [1v0]	72%	0%
Shadow Cresselia [2v2]	0%	63%
Shadow Cresselia [1v1]	66%	0%
Shadow Milotic [1v1]	63%	2%
Alolan Ninetales [1v2]	92%	51%
Galarian Moltres [0v0]	41%	99%
Shadow Feraligatr [0v0]	96%	50%
Florges [0v0]	52%	100%
Melmetal [0v0]	55%	100%
Talonflame [2v2]	44%	0%
Clefable [0v0]	37%	5%
Clefable [1v1]	37%	0%
Shadow Feraligatr [2v2]	63%	100%
Ninetales [0v0]	100%	68%
Alolan Muk [2v2]	69%	98%
Seaking [0v0]	0%	29%
Mimikyu [1v1]	0%	29%
Swampert [1v2]	29%	0%
Cramorant [1v2]	82%	91%
Annihilape [1v0]	73%	100%
Blastoise [2v2]	0%	24%
Shadow Snorlax [1v1]	0%	24%
Ninetales [1v1]	25%	0%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [1v0]	77%	100%
Walrein [2v2]	93%	87%
Tinkaton [0v0]	20%	0%
Cramorant [1v1]	82%	100%
Guzzlord [1v2]	93%	91%
Walrein [0v0]	100%	87%
Shadow Walrein [1v1]	100%	87%
Feraligatr [1v1]	0%	13%
Feraligatr [1v2]	0%	12%
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	12%	0%
Shadow Malamar [1v0]	100%	90%
Mimikyu [0v0]	100%	92%
Runerigus [1v2]	91%	100%
Lapras [0v0]	93%	100%
Shadow Empoleon [2v2]	0%	6%

Green tint = the cluster mostly wins that matchup, red tint = mostly loses; the percentage is the share of the cluster's IVs that win.

Stat rules that reproduce the clusters (in-sample accuracy 95.7%)

atk < 178.51:
  atk < 177.84:
    atk < 177.56:
      -> cluster C1 (n=1639)
    atk >= 177.56:
      -> cluster C1 (n=138)
  atk >= 177.84:
    hp < 194.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=160)
    hp >= 194.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=216)
atk >= 178.51:
  atk < 179.05:
    hp < 194.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=145)
    hp >= 194.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=151)
  atk >= 179.05:
    hp < 197.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=1547)
    hp >= 197.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=100)

Depth-3 decision tree over (atk, def, hp). Accuracy is in-sample (regularized by a minimum leaf size), not cross-validated -- read it as "how well the clusters reduce to stat regions", not a prediction claim.

Matchup flip thresholds (candidate anchors)

The single stat and threshold that most accurately predicts win/loss across all IVs -- misclassifications allowed, so it is a diagnostic and a candidate anchor, not a build target. The "flips at" cutoffs under "Threats where your build choice matters" answer the other question (the lowest cutoff whose 75/25 split is clean) and are usually higher for the same opponent.

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Dusknoir [0v0]	50%	wins iff atk < 178.47	89%	named
Shadow Walrein [0v0]	50%	wins iff sp >= 4,157,297	88%	named
Bellibolt [0v0]	51%	wins iff atk < 177.67	91%	named
Tinkaton [1v1]	52%	wins iff sp >= 4,164,582	95%	named
Registeel [1v0]	52%	wins iff sp >= 4,165,257	95%	named
Swampert [2v2]	48%	wins iff sp >= 4,199,791	78%	named
Shadow Talonflame [1v1]	53%	wins iff atk >= 178.06	100%	named
Dondozo [2v2]	56%	wins iff def >= 119.66	98%	named
Walrein [1v1]	44%	wins iff sp >= 4,170,190	85%	named
Dondozo [0v0]	56%	wins iff def >= 119.66	95%	named
Primarina [0v0]	57%	wins iff atk >= 177.73	100%	named
Cresselia [2v2]	42%	wins iff atk >= 178.40	93%	named
Rillaboom [2v2]	41%	wins iff sp >= 4,186,376	91%	named
Ampharos [0v0]	40%	wins iff atk < 177.60	94%	named
Tinkaton [1v0]	61%	wins iff sp >= 4,164,582	86%	named
Tinkaton [1v2]	38%	wins iff sp >= 4,192,035	92%	named
Giratina (Altered) [1v2]	35%	wins iff sp >= 4,200,584	91%	named
Cresselia [1v0]	66%	wins iff atk >= 177.11	100%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [1v0]	34%	wins iff atk >= 179.54	100%	named
Shadow Cresselia [2v2]	34%	wins iff sp >= 4,200,584	92%	named
Shadow Cresselia [1v1]	31%	wins iff atk >= 179.74	99%	named
Shadow Milotic [1v1]	31%	wins iff atk >= 178.89	88%	named
Alolan Ninetales [1v2]	70%	wins iff atk >= 176.66	94%	named
Galarian Moltres [0v0]	71%	wins iff sp >= 4,125,174	93%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [0v0]	72%	wins iff atk >= 176.29	90%	named
Florges [0v0]	77%	wins iff sp >= 4,118,725	93%	named
Melmetal [0v0]	79%	wins iff sp >= 4,112,972	95%	named
Talonflame [2v2]	21%	wins iff atk >= 180.55	100%	named
Clefable [0v0]	20%	wins iff atk >= 180.93	98%	named
Clefable [1v1]	18%	wins iff atk >= 180.93	100%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [2v2]	82%	wins iff hp >= 192	93%	named
Ninetales [0v0]	83%	wins iff atk >= 175.63	100%	named
Alolan Muk [2v2]	84%	wins iff def >= 117.01	100%	named
Seaking [0v0]	16%	wins iff sp >= 4,243,165	95%	named
Mimikyu [1v1]	15%	wins iff sp >= 4,242,956	93%	named
Swampert [1v2]	13%	wins iff atk >= 181.33	99%	named
Cramorant [1v2]	87%	wins iff hp >= 190	90%	named
Annihilape [1v0]	87%	wins iff atk < 181.43	95%	named
Blastoise [2v2]	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,251,575	93%	named
Shadow Snorlax [1v1]	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,251,575	94%	named
Ninetales [1v1]	12%	wins iff atk >= 181.43	100%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [1v0]	89%	wins iff sp >= 4,087,504	95%	named
Walrein [2v2]	90%	wins iff atk >= 174.50	96%	named
Tinkaton [0v0]	10%	wins iff atk >= 181.85	100%	named
Cramorant [1v1]	92%	wins iff hp >= 190	94%	named
Guzzlord [1v2]	92%	wins iff atk >= 174.15	97%	named
Walrein [0v0]	93%	wins iff atk >= 174.50	100%	named
Shadow Walrein [1v1]	93%	wins iff atk >= 174.50	100%	named
Feraligatr [1v1]	7%	wins iff def >= 124.15	100%	named
Feraligatr [1v2]	6%	wins iff def >= 124.15	99%	named
Shadow Malamar [2v2]	5%	wins iff atk >= 182.53	100%	named
Shadow Malamar [1v0]	95%	wins iff atk >= 174.19	100%	named
Mimikyu [0v0]	96%	wins iff atk >= 174.10	100%	named
Runerigus [1v2]	96%	wins iff sp >= 4,055,024	97%	named
Lapras [0v0]	97%	wins iff sp >= 4,044,135	97%	named
Shadow Empoleon [2v2]	3%	wins iff hp >= 204	98%	named

Rows are ordered by discriminating power (win rate closest to 50%). "Rule accuracy" is how well that single stat threshold predicts the win/loss across all IVs, and is only shown when it beats always-predicting the majority outcome; high-accuracy UNNAMED rows are candidate new anchors. "Named" means an authored anchor names that opponent (alt-moveset / IV-variant rows inherit their base opponent's anchor).

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1977	180.5	118.2	193	#1369-#4096	17.7	-
C1	2119	176.2	121.5	197	#1-#2840	22.0	Tinkaton [1v1] (+92pp), Dusknoir [0v0] (+80pp), Ampharos [0v0] (+76pp), Rillaboom [2v2] (+74pp); trades away Shadow Talonflame [1v1] (-90pp), Primarina [0v0] (-82pp), Cresselia [2v2] (-82pp), Shadow Cresselia [1v1] (-65pp)

Computed at bake time for moveset POWDER_SNOW / EARTHQUAKE, ICICLE_SPEAR with PvPoke default opponent IVs and bait-selective shield play, over the full opponent pool; this does not follow the scatter's moveset / opponent-IV / bait dropdowns or the opponent filter.

How this works

Per shield scenario: an opponent is contested when between 2% and 98% of this dive's IV spreads beat it (everyone else is settled and can't distinguish IVs). Each IV's fingerprint is its win/loss vector over those opponents; fingerprints are clustered bottom-up (agglomerative, Hamming distance, average linkage). The number of clusters, K, is chosen by silhouette -- a 0-to-1 score of how cleanly the fingerprints separate, where above about 0.5 the clusters are distinct groups and below 0.30 the headline says "weak separation" and the clusters are tendencies rather than tiers -- under a parsimony floor (a split must keep every cluster above a minimum size, and the smallest K in 2-6 within 0.03 of the best silhouette wins). Silhouettes are comparable between the scenarios on this page, not between species. Clusters are ordered weakest to strongest by mean contested wins. The scatter panels project the same 4,096 IV spreads onto each pair of battle stats; clusters that overlap completely in score separate cleanly there. A scenario is reported as degenerate (no clustering attempted) when it has fewer than 6 contested opponents or fewer than 8 distinct win patterns -- on that little data every candidate K scores near-perfectly, which is a measurement artifact and not structure -- and its bits are left out of the all scenarios fingerprint. A scenario that clears the floor but has no split keeping every cluster above the minimum size is reported as fragmented instead, and its bits still count toward the combined view. The all scenarios bits are ordered most-discriminating first, which is the tie-break the linkage uses when several merges are equally close. Replaces the retired score-gap cluster heuristic (2026-07), which usually (~77% of sampled runs) fired on float-level jitter in the opponent-averaged score, and even when it did catch a real tier could not name which matchups defined it.

Evidence

1. Header

Walrein (Shadow) -- Ultra League

POWDER_SNOW / EARTHQUAKE, ICICLE_SPEAR (arm 1 of 6)

Level view: L50. Bake 2026-09-27. Blob 20260927_131629_Walrein_ultra_shadow.replay.pkl.gz.

Opponent pool: 63 entries (Custom pool from ul_top60.txt (60 mons)). Grid: 4096 IV spreads x 9 shield scenarios.

Opponent-IV settings baked: PvPoke-default opponent IVs; PvPoke-default opponent IVs, focal never baits; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits.

Rankings snapshot 2026-09-27.

Stats are shadow-effective (attack x1.2 applied); the charge-move priority line is not (see Provenance).

2. Floor

18 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

18 single-stat values do separate a cell exactly (17 on attack, 1 on Def, 0 on HP, over 81 contested cells), but none of them clears every gate while splitting between 25% and 60% of the grid, which is what an exact line has to do to carry a floor label.

The closest dirty thresholds on this dive, printed as evidence and not as lines:

At the one decimal place PvPoke and Poke Genie display, the top row reads Def >= 119.6, which selects 2202 spreads where the exact value selects 2179: 23 more spreads land inside a line printed that way. The table prints the exact value because it is the one that selects the set the counts beside it describe.

A split is listed only when it puts fewer spreads on the wrong side than the constant rule does (predict one outcome for the whole grid) and when it keeps between 10% and 90% of the grid on each side.

cell	rank	closest split	spreads on the wrong side	constant rule gets wrong	wins at/above	wins below
2v2 Dondozo	rank 26	Def >= 119.657	100	1817	2179 of 2179	100 of 1917
0v1 Regidrago	rank 33	Def >= 120.58	299	1993	1694 of 1694	299 of 2402
0v0 Dondozo	rank 26	Def >= 119.657	194	1789	2146 of 2179	161 of 1917
2v1 Cramorant	rank 18	Atk >= 178.068	170	1744	2182 of 2182	170 of 1914

3. Lines on the other stats

No axis carries a line on this arm, so there is nothing to compare across them.

4. Example spreads

Existence proofs; each selection rule is printed with its spread.

There is no line on this arm, so the rules run over the whole grid rather than over a set of clearers.

The spread winning the most matchups on this grid is 2/8/15 with 296 of 567, so the whole IV decision here is 1 matchup wide.

rule	IVs	level	Atk / Def / HP	stat product	contested cells	all cells
most cells won on the whole grid	2/8/15	L40.0	174.50 / 121.18 / 203	98.58% (#86)	51	296
highest stat product (the rank-1 spread)	0/15/15	L39.5	171.98 / 125.34 / 202	100.00% (#1)	50	295

Cells won by shield scenario

spread	0v0	0v1	1v0	1v1	1v2	2v0	2v1	2v2	total
rank-1 0/15/15	33	11	57	32	7	63	57	35	295
2/8/15	34	9	58	32	8	63	56	36	296
0/15/15	33	11	57	32	7	63	57	35	295

5. Rank-1 check

Stat-product rank-1 is 0/15/15 at L39.5: 171.98 attack / 125.34 Def / 202 HP. It wins 295 of 567 cells (50 of the 81 contested ones).

There is no floor on this arm, so there is no line for it to be on one side of.

The lowest material rung it misses is 175.62 (0v0 Ninetales).

It is a member of the Alternative target below.

6. Alternative target

Def >= 124.15, HP >= 192: 252 spreads (6.2%), stat product 96.4% to 100.0% of rank-1, attack 171.98-177.01.

There is no line on this arm, so there is nothing for the rectangle to be disjoint from. Rule: among (Def, HP) rectangles with at least 100 members, the one winning the most contested cells with EVERY member that at most 1% of the spreads outside it win, counting only cells against a top-50 opponent in a non-degenerate scenario; ties broken by member count. The printed cuts are the least attained values among the members.

Wins 2 contested cells that way: 1v1 Feraligatr (rank 15), 1v2 Feraligatr (rank 15).

Rocket-grunt encounters (this is a shadow, so it cannot be traded) needed to land inside this rectangle: 11 for a 50% chance, 22 for a 75% chance. Model: the grunt IV floor is NOT verified here, and the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid.

Members win 279-295 cells in total.

IV envelope of the members -- attack IV 0-6, Def IV 9-15, HP IV 0-15. Members per attack IV: 0: 72, 1: 59, 2: 48, 3: 35, 4: 23, 5: 11, 6: 4.

Highest stat product inside it: 0/15/15 at L39.5 (100.00% of rank-1), 0/13/14 at L40.0 (99.66% of rank-1), 1/15/12 at L39.5 (99.55% of rank-1), 0/15/14 at L39.5 (99.50% of rank-1), 0/14/15 at L39.5 (99.48% of rank-1).

7. Cost

This test finds no reverse single-stat clean cut: no cell on this dive is won by every LOW spread and lost by every high one.

8. Rungs above

No floor on this arm, so no ladder above one.

9. Material clean cuts

Clean cuts holding between 10% and 90% of the grid, ascending. The widest of them sit under nearly every spread on the grid; the narrow ones at the bottom of the table do not.

cut	cells owned	spreads	settings	mechanism
Atk >= 175.62	0v0 Ninetales (rank 34)	3412 (83.3%)	2/4	Mechanism: POWDER_SNOW damage steps 3 -> 4 across the cut.
Atk >= 177.11	1v0 Cresselia (rank 35)	2694 (65.8%)	2/4	Mechanism: POWDER_SNOW damage steps 4 -> 5 across the cut.
Atk >= 177.51	2v1 Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (rank 59)	2498 (61.0%)	2/4	Mechanism: EARTHQUAKE damage steps 102 -> 103 across the cut.
Atk >= 177.72	0v0 Primarina (rank 51)	2353 (57.4%)	2/4	Mechanism: EARTHQUAKE damage steps 93 -> 94 across the cut.
Atk >= 178.06	1v1 Talonflame (Shadow) (rank 56)	2183 (53.3%)	4/4	Mechanism: POWDER_SNOW damage steps 7 -> 8 across the cut.
Atk >= 179.54	1v0 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42)	1387 (33.9%)	2/4	Mechanism: ICICLE_SPEAR damage steps 34 -> 35 across the cut.
Atk >= 180.54	2v2 Talonflame (rank 38)	854 (20.8%)	4/4	Mechanism: ICICLE_SPEAR damage steps 69 -> 70 across the cut.
Atk >= 180.92	1v1 Clefable (rank 37)	721 (17.6%)	4/4	Mechanism: charge-move priority against Clefable. That Clefable is built at 4/12/15, L47.5, 150.66 attack; 1.2 x 150.66 = 180.79, which falls in the gap (180.78, 180.93] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself.
Atk >= 181.43	1v1 Ninetales (rank 34)	488 (11.9%)	2/4	Mechanism: charge-move priority against Ninetales. That Ninetales is built at 12/15/14, L49.0, 151.19 attack; 1.2 x 151.19 = 181.43, which falls in the gap (181.41, 181.44] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself.

10. Bulk

Clean cuts by axis: 17 on attack, 1 on Def, 0 on HP.

11. Coverage

Omitted: there is no floor on this arm, so there is no line to place.

12. Mirror

Against the pool's own Walrein (Shadow) entry. Seat: our side is the optimised row; the mirror opponent always baits.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 2913 0 0 4096 4088 0 4096 4096 17.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 2913 0 0 4096 4088 0 4096 4096 17.

shields	win rate over the whole grid
0v0	49.8%
0v1	0.0%
0v2	0.0%
1v0	100.0%
1v1	93.0%
1v2	0.0%
2v0	100.0%
2v1	100.0%
2v2	1.0%

13. Changes the score, not the matchup

Cells won (or lost) by every spread where the battle score still steps by at least 60 at one attainable attack value.

Ordered by how close the step comes to the win line (500), nearest first: the question this field answers is how close a cell is to becoming a matchup, not how large the swing inside it is.

12 of 24 steps are listed, closest to the win line first; 12 more are not.

value	cell	rank	score step	points from 500	outcome
Atk >= 173.24	1v1 Giratina (Altered)	rank 17	524 -> 595	24 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 184.81	1v2 Clefable	rank 37	240 -> 465	35 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 183.20	1v2 Walrein (Shadow)	rank 41	247 -> 462	38 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 179.73	2v1 Cresselia (Shadow)	rank 46	544 -> 800	44 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 172.30	2v1 Blastoise	rank 29	559 -> 667	59 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 176.13	1v1 Runerigus	rank 43	573 -> 759	73 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 182.53	1v1 Malamar (Shadow)	rank 54	197 -> 419	81 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 174.498	2v1 Walrein	rank 40	584 -> 729	84 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 174.498	1v0 Walrein (Shadow)	rank 41	601 -> 781	101 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 178.88	2v1 Milotic (Shadow)	rank 50	607 -> 670	107 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 174.09	1v0 Mimikyu	rank 10	618 -> 751	118 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 179.73	0v0 Cresselia (Shadow)	rank 46	287 -> 376	124 (closing)	lost on both sides

14. Not claimed

63 of 81 contested matchups have no clean single-stat rule and are not claimed.

6 of 59 top-50 matchups are listed, one per base species and closest to an even split first; 53 more are not.

cell	rank	win rate over the whole grid
0v0 Dusknoir	rank 24	50.1%
0v0 Walrein (Shadow)	rank 41	49.8%
0v1 Regidrago	rank 33	48.7%
1v1 Tinkaton	rank 1	51.8%
1v0 Registeel	rank 28	52.1%
2v2 Swampert	rank 48	47.5%

15. How sure

17 clean attack cuts, 1 on Def, 0 on HP, over 81 contested cells (245 cells are won by every spread, 241 lost by every spread).

Scenarios barred from carrying a floor -- fewer than 6 contested cells, or fewer than 8 distinct opponent columns among them; the dive page's "degenerate" flag applies the same two numbers to its own stricter counts, so it can flag a different set: 0v2 (1 contested, 2 distinct opponent columns), 2v0 (0 contested, 1 distinct opponent columns).

Independent check: the dive page's matchup clusters, under "Why these regions", which partition this same grid by whole win/loss fingerprint across all 5 non-degenerate shield scenarios, splits it at attack 178.51 (K=2, silhouette 0.53).

Not measured here: opponent IVs outside the baked cohorts, post-match HP and shields, XL or dust cost, and any live-game check of the priority convention.

16. Provenance

Every threshold in this section is one of three things, and each is badged where it is printed. An EXACT clean cut: every spread at or above it wins the named cell and no spread below it does. A ONE-SIDED GATE: one side is pure and the other is at least 97% pure -- either nothing below it wins (clearing it is necessary) or everything at or above it wins (clearing it is sufficient). A NEAR-EXACT split: at most 0.5% of the grid sits on the wrong side of it in total. The win predicate is gopvpsim.battle.is_win (score > 500; 500 itself is a tie, not a win).

That is stricter than the two numbers the dive page prints for the same opponent: the Threats "flips at" boundary (a 75/25 gate, so spreads on the passing side can still lose) and the Matchup clusters flip table's single-stat split for that one opponent (the most accurate such split, misclassifications allowed). The cluster line in "How sure" above is a third thing again: not one opponent but the stat rule that reproduces that section's "all scenarios" partition of the whole grid.

Priority ties: the coverage ladder counts an exact attack tie as NOT beaten. The engine is seat-dependent on an exact tie, so a tied line is not a guarantee in either direction.

Ranks and opponent builds are read live from the 2026-09-27 rankings snapshot and the current gamemaster; this blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so the render is a function of the blob plus those two live reads.

Auto-derived: this section is generated by scripts/deep_dive_brief.py from the replay blob. No human prose is in it.

How the line was selected (gates and guards)

Decision band for the floor (D1): the lowest ELIGIBLE rung whose clearer pool sits inside [25%, 60%] of the grid. Materiality band for a rung: [10%, 90%].

To be ELIGIBLE AS THE FLOOR -- not to be listed as a rung -- a cut needs at least 20 attack/20 defense/5 HP distinct attainable values below it, an opponent of rank 50 or better outside the caveat list, a non-degenerate shield scenario, a win rate at or above the cut of at least 90% in every setting, and a closed-form mechanism. Listing is a weaker bar: a rung is printed when it keeps 25% of the grid (above the floor) or sits in the materiality band (below it) AND points the same way in at least 2 settings, so a listed rung may be unattributed, low-ranked or 2-of-4.

A cut can fail several gates at once, so the failure tally below sums to more than the number of cuts.

Co-gate sub-rectangles need 5% of the grid; the alternative target needs 100 members; a score-only step needs 60 points. These constants are calibrated on one species and are parameters of the stage that uses them, not tuned per dive.

Floor pool by primitive on the attack axis -- the axis the cross-stat rule selected -- each selected on its own under the same band and the same gates: exact -> Atk >= 177.72 (0v0 Primarina, 57.4%) rejected on G-rank, G-direction (2 of 4 settings); one-sided gate -> Atk >= 179.73 (1v1 Cresselia (Shadow), 31.9%) rejected on G-direction (2 of 4 settings); near-exact -> no candidate in the band. Selected: no floor. Selection takes the lowest eligible rung in the band; a stronger primitive within 0.50 stat points of it wins the tie, in the order exact, one-sided gate, near-exact. A gate needs 97% of its dirty side pointing the right way; a near-exact split needs at most 0.5% of the grid on the wrong side. Only exact rungs merge, in either direction.

Degradation ladder: rung reached = c. 18 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

Of 18 clean cuts, 2 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-direction 10, G-rank 6, G-material-lo 5, G-material-hi 4, G-material-gap 4, G-attributed 2.

Of 40 one-sided gate and near-exact candidates, 1 clears every gate. Gate failures: G-direction 31, G-attributed 29, G-material-hi 20, G-material-gap 20, G-material-lo 16, G-scenario 2.

G-cmp-fresh (WARN, not a failure): 2 cut(s) have a live priority line within 0.50 attack of the cut but outside its gap, so they print unattributed: 0v0 Walrein, 1v1 Walrein (Shadow). This blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so a rebalance since the bake would look exactly like this.

Closest dirty thresholds on cells with no clean rule: 2v2 Dondozo Def >= 119.657 (100 spreads on the wrong side); 0v1 Regidrago Def >= 120.58 (299 spreads on the wrong side); 0v0 Dondozo Def >= 119.657 (194 spreads on the wrong side); 2v1 Cramorant Atk >= 178.068 (170 spreads on the wrong side).

band	attack line it selects	cell
[25%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 55%]	no floor	-
[25%, 50%]	no floor	-
[20%, 60%]	180.54	2v2 Talonflame
[30%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 70%]	no floor	-

Terms used here

build criteria: Which shield scenarios the ranking counts: all nine equally, the three even ones, or 1v1 alone.
build: A region of the IV grid you can aim at -- every spread that clears the same combination of thresholds, at least fifty of them.
guaranteed: Won by every single spread in the region, not by most of them.
decision matchup: A (shield scenario, opponent) pair the IV choice decides: a top-50 opponent that some spreads on this grid beat and others lose to.
wide: The looser rule drawn around a region of the grid: it holds every spread that region holds and more, so it wins less for every member but is easier to hit.
stat-product rank-1 (SP1): The IV spread with the largest attack x defense x HP at this league's CP cap -- the bulk-first spread most IV tools list first. Written SP1 where it is named repeatedly.
material: A matchup no single-stat threshold of a hundred or more spreads wins more than 95% of the time, so it takes two stats at once to claim it.
opponent-IV mode: One of the ways every opponent was made for this bake -- PvPoke-default IVs or the bulkiest ones, each with and without the focal side baiting -- so a claim that holds in all of them does not depend on how the opponent was made.
stat product: Attack x defense x HP at the league's CP cap, the usual one-number summary of an IV spread.
staircase: A rule whose defense floor steps DOWN as HP goes up, so bulk can be spent on either stat: one floor per HP value rather than one floor for all of them.
fork: A second region with no spread in common with the first that wins a noticeably different set of matchups outright -- the two overlap on less than 80% of them -- so they are a real choice rather than two spellings of one.
bulk box: A rule that is a defense floor and an HP floor and nothing else -- a rectangle on the defense / HP plane.
outside rate: How often the spreads left OUT of a region win the same matchup its own members all win -- one the rest of the grid takes anyway is not what you bought.
charge-move priority (CMP): When both sides throw a charged move on the same turn, the higher attack stat goes first.
contested matchups: The matchups some IV spreads on this grid win and others lose -- the only ones an IV choice can change.
UpSet plot: A bar chart of set intersections: each column is one candidate region, and the dots under it mark which named sets it lies inside (Lex et al. 2014).
bulkpoint: A defense value across which an opponent's damage into you steps down by a whole point, or an HP value across which the number of hits they need to knock you out changes.
one-sided gate: A stat value with one clean side: either nothing below it wins the matchup, or everything at or above it does -- so clearing it is required, or enough, but not both.
rung: An attack value above the line at which some further matchup flips for every spread that reaches it.

Moveset: Switching movesets reloads the page; pasted CSV will need to be re-loaded. Shields: Build criteria: Opponent IVs: Bait: Y-axis: Color: Anchors: Build criteria weights shield scenarios in: Which one to build?, the all-scenarios clusters, and Shields = All (by build criteria). Nothing else on this page is re-weighted by it. Threshold tiers (e.g. GH Great / GH Good) are expert stat-cutoff regions defined in Threshold Tiers below. Hover legend to isolate; click to lock.

Check my collection - Your collection stays in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Paste your Poke Genie CSV export below, or click Choose file… to load one from disk. You’ll see which of your Walreins (and pre-evolutions) qualify for each tier, overlaid on the scatter plot.

Show only my mons

Or enter one at a time - Atk/Def/HP IVs (0-15), level, shadow flag. Same format as PvPoke / PvPIVs.

Species Atk Def HP Level Shadow

Compare candidates - up to 7 of your IV spreads, side by side: wins, mirror, and the close calls that decide the build

Add a spread: Atk Def HP 0 / 7 added

Highlight IVs:

Top IVs Rows: Ranked by this dive's battle simulation (not fetched from PvPoke). Click any column header to sort.

Battle-Rating Distribution

Per-matchup battle-rating distribution for the reference IV (PvPoke default or Rank 1, matching the Opponent-IVs dropdown) across the opponent pool, under the currently-selected Shields / Opponent-IVs / Bait.

Powder Snow / Earthquake, Icicle Spear

IV Recommendations

Moveset: Powder Snow / Earthquake, Icicle Spear. Vs PvPoke default opponents.

IV Flavor Guide (Simulation)

Auto-generated from simulation matchup data. Flavor names (e.g. "Premium Bulk", "Fortified {Opp}", "{Opp} Slayer") are derived from which opponents each IV cluster beats, not from the expert-authored Threshold Tiers section above. This IV Flavor Guide and the Threshold Tiers answer different questions and may not line up 1:1. New to flavor cards? The IV Flavor Guide walks through the six name families and the trade-off layout.

In Ultra League, Walrein has 4 flavors: General Good, Fortified Feraligatr (126.59+ Def), Miltank Slayer, and Fortified Feraligatr (124.89+ Def). In general, the General Good variation may be the flavor of choice, as it plays up Walrein's potential vs Guzzlord, Ampharos, Annihilape, among others.

Flavor	IVs	%	Catches needed
General Good [Recommended]	4073	99.4%	almost any will do
Fortified Feraligatr (126.59+ Def)	5	0.1%	very rare
Miltank Slayer	17	0.4%	~167-334 for a 50-75% chance
Fortified Feraligatr (124.89+ Def)	93	2.3%	~31-61 for a 50-75% chance

General Good (172.07 Atk, 112.99 Def, 187 HP) [Recommended]

112.99 Def and 187 HP is a safe baseline for Walrein, with an attack floor of 172.07 Atk for coverage against key opponents.

187 HP is also a safe spot, helping secure the mirror and key matchups vs Ampharos, Blastoise.

113.40 Def with 187+ HP for Annihilape (1v0), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v0), Cramorant (1v1, 1v2), Cresselia (incl. Shadow) (2v2), Feraligatr (incl. Shadow) (2v2), Florges (0v0), Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1), Giratina (Altered) (1v2), Guzzlord (1v2), Melmetal (0v0), Muk (Alolan) (2v2), Rillaboom (2v2), Runerigus (1v2), Tinkaton (1v2), Blastoise (2v1), Empoleon (incl. Shadow) (2v1), Ninetales (Alolan) (incl. Shadow) (0v1, 2v2), Primarina (1v1), Moltres (Galarian) (0v0), Regidrago (0v1), Walrein (1v1), Dondozo (2v1)
113.82 Def with 195+ HP for the Registeel (1v0)
114.24 Def with 195+ HP for Tinkaton (1v1), Ampharos (0v0), Registeel (1v0)
115.11 Def with 196+ HP for the Tinkaton (1v1)
115.50 Def for the Moltres (Galarian) (0v0)
115.54 Def for the Dondozo (0v0)
115.75 Def for Dondozo (2v1), Walrein (incl. Shadow) (0v0)
116.15 Def for the Dondozo (2v2 with bait)

Fortified Feraligatr (126.59+ Def)

The "Fortified Feraligatr (126.59+ Def)" Walrein fortifies its bulk to pick up the Feraligatr 1v1, 1v2. This requires 126.59 Def with 194 HP.

Note: Only 5 IV spreads reach this target, so it may require specific IV luck.

Miltank Slayer (183.88 Atk, 190 HP)

The "Miltank Slayer" Walrein trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Miltank 1v1, the Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) 2v1, the Blastoise 1v1. Walrein would need 183.88 Atk while maintaining 190 HP.

Note: The drop in bulk will cost several matchups, such as the Annihilape 1v0, Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) 1v0, Blastoise 2v1, among others.

Fortified Feraligatr (124.89+ Def)

The "Fortified Feraligatr (124.89+ Def)" Walrein fortifies its bulk to pick up the Feraligatr 1v1, 1v2. This requires 124.89 Def with 194 HP.

Rank-1 Walrein (0/15/15) falls short on Atk (needs 172.07, has 171.98) vs the General Good threshold. If you have rank-1, you are trading threshold reach for max stat product.

Simulation-Derived IV Tiers

Auto-derived from the sim (not expert-authored).

Threshold Tiers

Stat-target headlines from thresholds/*.toml, each grouped with the named anchors its spec clears and the IV spreads that meet it. Within each tier card, bullets are grouped by opponent and sorted by the required stat (Def or Atk) ascending - read top-to-bottom in the order a player would clear them as their stat grows. The flat list of every anchor (regardless of tier) lives in Anchor-Driven Matchup Flips below. New to tier cards? The Threshold Tiers guide walks through what the stat cutoffs and member counts mean. A tier's anchors come from two passes over the anchor list:

Primary bullets - the tier has a cutoff on the anchor's target axis (atk or def) that meets or exceeds the anchor's threshold. Consequences:
- Subset case: if tier A is strictly stricter than tier B on the anchor axis, A's bullet list is a superset of B's. Overlap is intentional.
- Crossed-cutoff case: tier A has only an atk cutoff, tier B has only a def cutoff - neither is a subset of the other. Atk anchors appear only on A; def anchors only on B.
- Slayer-axis IV-count case: two tiers can list the same atk anchor but have different member-IV counts because a stricter tier's def cutoff excludes def-sacrificing spreads that the looser tier keeps. Check the (−N vs parent) callout on the tier header to spot this at a glance.
Anchors we get for free (collapsed) - the tier has no cutoff on the anchor's target axis, but every IV in the tier clears the anchor's threshold anyway. These would be silently dropped by the primary filter; we surface them in a separate collapsed block so the card isn't misleading.

Fortified Feraligatr (126.59+ Def) · def≥126.59, hp≥194 (5 IV spreads) (−88 vs Fortified Feraligatr (124.89+ Def) (def-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 226 anchors across 7 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Annihilape, Bellibolt, Blastoise, +31 more. Matchup flips vs Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow) (2 scenarios, 10 IVs).

113.23 Def + 191 HP for Tinkaton (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
113.59 Def + 190 HP for Tinkaton (Flash Cannon) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
113.84 Def + 190 HP for Tinkaton (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
114.02 Def + 191 HP for Tinkaton (Bulldoze) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
114.36 Def + 190 HP for Tinkaton (Heavy Slam) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
119.41 Def + 189 HP for Tinkaton (Rock Smash) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
113.19 Def + 195 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.33 Def + 195 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.48 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Superpower) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.52 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.57 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.64 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Outrage) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
114.34 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
123.97 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Zen Headbutt) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.10 Def + 187 HP for Melmetal (Rock Slide) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.35 Def + 187 HP for Melmetal (Superpower) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.46 Def + 187 HP for Melmetal (Thunderbolt) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.46 Def + 187 HP for Melmetal (Dynamic Punch) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.74 Def + 188 HP for Melmetal (Hyper Beam) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.78 Def + 188 HP for Melmetal (Flash Cannon) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
114.48 Def + 189 HP for Melmetal (Double Iron Bash) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.36 Def + 197 HP for Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Empoleon (0v1, 1v1)
113.89 Def + 196 HP for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (0v1, 1v1)
114.04 Def + 197 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (0v1, 1v1)
114.84 Def + 196 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
115.14 Def + 197 HP for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (0v1, 1v1)
124.06 Def + 198 HP for Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
126.32 Def + 196 HP for Empoleon (Metal Claw) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
126.32 Def + 196 HP for Empoleon (Steel Wing) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
126.32 Def + 196 HP for Empoleon (Metal Sound) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
112.99 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.12 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.25 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.36 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.43 Def + 188 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
115.79 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2 with bait)
117.90 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Steel Wing) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2 with bait)
126.32 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Metal Claw) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2 with bait)
126.32 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Metal Sound) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2 with bait)
113.21 Def + 197 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
113.73 Def + 195 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
113.90 Def + 197 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
124.53 Def for Mimikyu (Shadow Claw) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
124.53 Def for Mimikyu (Hex) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
113.19 Def + 188 HP for Florges (Trailblaze) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
113.66 Def for Florges (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
113.69 Def + 188 HP for Florges (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
113.78 Def + 192 HP for Florges (Psychic) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
113.78 Def + 193 HP for Florges (Chilling Water) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
113.83 Def + 192 HP for Florges (Moonblast) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
114.43 Def for Florges (Vine Whip) vs Florges (0v0)
120.15 Def for Florges (Razor Leaf) vs Florges (0v1)
120.15 Def for Florges (Fairy Wind) vs Florges (0v1)
113.11 Def + 189 HP for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 0v1)
113.49 Def + 187 HP for Galarian Moltres (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 0v1)
113.74 Def + 188 HP for Galarian Moltres (Ancient Power) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 0v1)
113.74 Def + 188 HP for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 0v1)
116.59 Def for Galarian Moltres (Sucker Punch) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
116.59 Def for Galarian Moltres (Wing Attack) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
113.13 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
113.80 Def + 188 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Waterfall) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
114.35 Def + 189 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
114.60 Def + 189 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
114.86 Def + 190 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
124.15 Def + 199 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Bite) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1 with bait)
124.15 Def + 199 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1 with bait)
122.75 Def for Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
123.01 Def for Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
124.15 Def for Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
124.15 Def for Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
125.42 Def for Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
113.42 Def + 193 HP for Giratina Altered (Ancient Power) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
113.42 Def + 193 HP for Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
113.42 Def + 193 HP for Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
114.04 Def + 193 HP for Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
113.26 Def + 187 HP for Cramorant (Surf) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.26 Def + 187 HP for Cramorant (Dive) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.31 Def + 187 HP for Cramorant (Fly) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.77 Def + 188 HP for Cramorant (Hydro Pump) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord (Snarl) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord (Dragon Tail) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.01 Def + 192 HP for Rillaboom (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.14 Def + 193 HP for Rillaboom (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.17 Def + 193 HP for Rillaboom (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.31 Def + 193 HP for Rillaboom (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.81 Def + 193 HP for Rillaboom (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
119.50 Def + 194 HP for Rillaboom (Razor Leaf) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.05 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.05 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.22 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.22 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.32 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
114.01 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
114.30 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
114.30 Def + 206 HP for Shadow Lapras (Frost Breath) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
117.57 Def + 206 HP for Shadow Lapras (Water Gun) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
114.74 Def + 190 HP for Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
114.93 Def + 189 HP for Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
114.93 Def + 189 HP for Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
115.33 Def + 191 HP for Dusknoir (Shadow Punch) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
115.48 Def + 188 HP for Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
115.67 Def + 190 HP for Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
116.93 Def for Dusknoir (Ominous Wind) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
119.52 Def for Dusknoir (Hex) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
119.52 Def for Dusknoir (Astonish) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
113.13 Def + 200 HP for Dondozo (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
113.84 Def + 199 HP for Dondozo (Surf) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
113.96 Def + 200 HP for Dondozo (Outrage) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
114.22 Def + 201 HP for Dondozo (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
119.66 Def + 201 HP for Dondozo (Waterfall) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v2)
113.28 Def + 191 HP for Registeel (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v1)
113.34 Def + 190 HP for Registeel (Focus Blast) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v1)
113.34 Def + 190 HP for Registeel (Zap Cannon) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v1)
114.02 Def + 191 HP for Registeel (Hyper Beam) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v1)
114.93 Def + 195 HP for Registeel (Rock Smash) vs Registeel (1v0)
119.72 Def + 201 HP for Registeel (Metal Claw) vs Registeel (2v1)
113.09 Def + 187 HP for Blastoise (Flash Cannon) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
113.42 Def + 187 HP for Blastoise (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
113.67 Def + 188 HP for Blastoise (Skull Bash) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
114.02 Def + 188 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
114.56 Def + 189 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
116.43 Def + 201 HP for Blastoise (Rollout) vs Blastoise (2v2 with bait)
113.04 Def for Regidrago (Dragon Pulse) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.04 Def for Regidrago (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.32 Def for Regidrago (Hyper Beam) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.36 Def for Regidrago (Outrage) vs Regidrago (0v1)
119.21 Def for Regidrago (Vise Grip) vs Regidrago (0v1)
120.58 Def for Regidrago (Dragon Breath) vs Regidrago (0v1)
120.58 Def for Regidrago (Breaking Swipe) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.51 Def + 195 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
113.89 Def + 194 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
114.14 Def + 194 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
114.26 Def + 198 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
114.91 Def + 194 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
117.00 Def + 198 HP for Alolan Muk (Bite) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
117.00 Def + 198 HP for Alolan Muk (Poison Jab) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
117.00 Def + 198 HP for Alolan Muk (Snarl) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
117.00 Def + 196 HP for Alolan Muk (Acid Spray) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
119.43 Def + 197 HP for Clefable (Meteor Mash) vs Clefable (0v0)
119.69 Def + 199 HP for Clefable (Swift) vs Clefable (0v0)
120.19 Def + 197 HP for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (0v0)
120.19 Def + 197 HP for Clefable (Moonblast) vs Clefable (0v0)
120.40 Def + 199 HP for Clefable (Psychic) vs Clefable (0v0)
120.53 Def + 199 HP for Clefable (Draining Kiss) vs Clefable (0v0)
113.42 Def + 190 HP for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (1v1)
113.42 Def + 191 HP for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (1v1)
114.87 Def + 190 HP for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (1v1)
114.87 Def + 192 HP for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (1v1)
113.42 Def + 188 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
113.42 Def + 188 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
114.51 Def + 189 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
116.30 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
116.97 Def + 189 HP for Shadow Walrein (Waterfall) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
113.10 Def for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (1v2)
113.23 Def for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (1v2)
113.95 Def for Runerigus (Brutal Swing) vs Runerigus (1v2)
114.36 Def for Runerigus (Astonish) vs Runerigus (1v2)
114.36 Def for Runerigus (Shadow Claw) vs Runerigus (1v2)
114.36 Def for Runerigus (Sand Tomb) vs Runerigus (1v2)
113.02 Def + 196 HP for Seaking (Megahorn) vs Seaking (0v0)
113.21 Def + 197 HP for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (0v0)
113.51 Def + 195 HP for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (0v0)
114.01 Def + 198 HP for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (0v0)
115.82 Def + 198 HP for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (0v0)
121.07 Def + 198 HP for Seaking (Poison Jab) vs Seaking (0v0)
122.31 Def + 197 HP for Seaking (Waterfall) vs Seaking (0v0)
124.53 Def for Seaking (Peck) vs Seaking (0v0)
113.11 Def + 193 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
113.19 Def + 192 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
114.14 Def + 192 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
114.14 Def + 193 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Confusion) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
114.14 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Psycho Cut) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
114.32 Def + 195 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
120.41 Def + 195 HP for Shadow Steelix (Breaking Swipe) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1 with bait)
120.49 Def + 194 HP for Shadow Steelix (Earthquake) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1 with bait)
121.26 Def + 194 HP for Shadow Steelix (Crunch) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1 with bait)
121.97 Def + 194 HP for Shadow Steelix (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1 with bait)
123.42 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Steelix (Psychic Fangs) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1 with bait)
126.38 Def + 195 HP for Shadow Steelix (Thunder Fang) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1 with bait)
114.11 Def + 191 HP for Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.16 Def + 190 HP for Ampharos (Thunder) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.37 Def + 189 HP for Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.43 Def + 192 HP for Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.54 Def + 189 HP for Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.58 Def + 188 HP for Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.78 Def + 192 HP for Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.88 Def + 191 HP for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (0v0)
115.40 Def + 189 HP for Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Ampharos (0v0)
113.42 Def for Annihilape (Close Combat) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.42 Def for Annihilape (Low Sweep) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.42 Def for Annihilape (Counter) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.72 Def for Annihilape (Rage Fist) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.93 Def for Annihilape (Shadow Ball) vs Annihilape (1v0)
114.87 Def for Annihilape (Night Slash) vs Annihilape (1v0)
112.99 Def + 194 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
113.13 Def + 194 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
113.37 Def + 194 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
115.39 Def + 195 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
115.39 Def + 195 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
115.39 Def + 194 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
118.16 Def + 196 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Feint Attack) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
118.16 Def + 196 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Charm) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
113.29 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.30 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.43 Def + 201 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Charm) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.62 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.94 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
114.03 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
114.59 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
118.16 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Feint Attack) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.00 Def for Primarina (Moonblast) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.00 Def for Primarina (Charm) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.30 Def for Primarina (Waterfall) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.65 Def + 188 HP for Primarina (Hydro Cannon) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.65 Def + 188 HP for Primarina (Sparkling Aria) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
118.75 Def + 203 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
119.12 Def + 203 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
119.67 Def + 203 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Ancient Power) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
119.67 Def + 203 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
113.12 Def + 190 HP for Bellibolt (Zap Cannon) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
113.45 Def + 190 HP for Bellibolt (Parabolic Charge) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
114.18 Def + 193 HP for Bellibolt (Discharge) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
123.17 Def for Bellibolt (Thunder Shock) vs Bellibolt (0v0)

Anchors we get for free (16 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

172.91 Atk for Mimikyu (Earthquake) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
172.30 Atk for Guzzlord (Earthquake) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Icicle Spear) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Powder Snow) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
172.88 Atk for Ninetales (Earthquake) vs Ninetales (0v0)
172.38 Atk for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
173.20 Atk for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
172.07 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (1v1)
173.20 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (1v1)
172.58 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Earthquake) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
173.50 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
172.39 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 with bait)
172.92 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Earthquake) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 with bait)
172.81 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Milotic (2v2 with bait)
173.34 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Earthquake) vs Shadow Milotic (2v1, 2v2)
172.64 Atk for Bellibolt (Earthquake) vs Bellibolt (1v1 with bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

113.40 Def flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v0) [4095 IVs]
113.40 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1 with bait) [4095 IVs]

Member IVs (5)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
1/15/2 👑	174.65	126.59	194	#49	+0	-1.3	-1.3	-10.6
0/15/2 👑	174.24	126.98	194	#208	+0	-4.8	-1.4	-11.3
0/15/5 👑	173.69	126.59	196	#251	+0	-6.4	-0.2	-12.4
0/15/4	173.69	126.59	195	#786	+0	-8.9	-1.5	-14.7
0/15/3	173.69	126.59	194	#1373	+0	-9.8	-6.2	-14.3

Miltank Slayer · atk≥183.88, hp≥190 (17 IV spreads) (−376 vs Tinkaton Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 57 anchors across 7 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Bellibolt, Clefable, Cramorant, +21 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Miltank (2 scenario flips).

181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Powder Snow) vs Tinkaton (0v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Icicle Spear) vs Tinkaton (0v0)
181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Earthquake) vs Tinkaton (0v0)
172.91 Atk for Mimikyu (Earthquake) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
175.08 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Earthquake) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
176.18 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
176.73 Atk for Cramorant (Earthquake) vs Cramorant (2v1)
178.06 Atk for Cramorant (Icicle Spear) vs Cramorant (2v1)
172.30 Atk for Guzzlord (Earthquake) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Icicle Spear) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Powder Snow) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Icicle Spear) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v2 with bait)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v2 with bait)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Earthquake) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v2 with bait)
172.88 Atk for Ninetales (Earthquake) vs Ninetales (0v0, 1v1)
175.63 Atk for Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Ninetales (0v0)
175.63 Atk for Ninetales (Icicle Spear) vs Ninetales (0v0, 1v1)
175.33 Atk for Cresselia (Earthquake) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v2)
177.10 Atk for Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Cresselia (1v0)
178.37 Atk for Cresselia (Icicle Spear) vs Cresselia (2v2)
177.28 Atk for Clefable (Earthquake) vs Clefable (0v0, 1v1)
179.39 Atk for Clefable (Icicle Spear) vs Clefable (0v0, 1v1)
180.53 Atk for Talonflame (Icicle Spear) vs Talonflame (2v2)
181.68 Atk for Talonflame (Earthquake) vs Talonflame (2v2)
183.14 Atk for Talonflame (Powder Snow) vs Talonflame (2v2)
172.38 Atk for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
173.20 Atk for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
172.07 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (1v1)
173.20 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (1v1)
179.48 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Icicle Spear) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v0)
181.06 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Earthquake) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v0)
173.84 Atk for Runerigus (Earthquake) vs Runerigus (0v1)
174.32 Atk for Runerigus (Icicle Spear) vs Runerigus (0v1)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
181.04 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Earthquake) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
181.66 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Icicle Spear) vs Swampert (1v2)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Powder Snow) vs Swampert (1v2)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Earthquake) vs Swampert (1v2)
177.72 Atk for Primarina (Earthquake) vs Primarina (0v0)
183.45 Atk for Primarina (Icicle Spear) vs Primarina (0v0)
172.58 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Earthquake) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v2)
173.50 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0, 2v2)
178.06 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
178.26 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Earthquake) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
178.78 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
183.88 Atk for Miltank (Icicle Spear) vs Miltank (1v1)
174.51 Atk for Ampharos (Earthquake) vs Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
176.72 Atk for Ampharos (Icicle Spear) vs Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
176.72 Atk for Ampharos (Powder Snow) vs Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
175.64 Atk for Lapras (Icicle Spear) vs Lapras (0v0)
176.73 Atk for Lapras (Earthquake) vs Lapras (0v0)
172.39 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 1v2)
172.92 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Earthquake) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 1v2, 2v2)
172.81 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Milotic (2v1, 2v2)
173.34 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Earthquake) vs Shadow Milotic (2v1, 2v2)
172.64 Atk for Bellibolt (Earthquake) vs Bellibolt (1v1 with bait)

Anchors we get for free (122 cleared by every IV in this tier despite no cutoff on the relevant axis)

113.23 Def + 198 HP for Tinkaton bulk (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (1v2 with bait)
113.59 Def + 198 HP for Tinkaton bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Tinkaton (1v2 with bait)
113.84 Def + 197 HP for Tinkaton bulk (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (1v2 with bait)
114.02 Def + 197 HP for Tinkaton bulk (Bulldoze) vs Tinkaton (1v2 with bait)
113.19 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Snorlax bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.33 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Snorlax bulk (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.48 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Snorlax bulk (Superpower) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.52 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Snorlax bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.57 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Snorlax bulk (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.64 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Snorlax bulk (Outrage) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.10 Def + 203 HP for Melmetal bulk (Rock Slide) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.35 Def for Melmetal bulk (Superpower) vs Melmetal (0v0)
113.46 Def for Melmetal bulk (Thunderbolt) vs Melmetal (0v0)
113.46 Def for Melmetal bulk (Dynamic Punch) vs Melmetal (0v0)
113.74 Def for Melmetal bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Melmetal (0v0)
113.78 Def for Melmetal bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Melmetal (0v0)
113.36 Def + 205 HP for Empoleon bulk (Drill Peck) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
113.89 Def + 205 HP for Empoleon bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
114.04 Def + 205 HP for Empoleon bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
112.99 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.12 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.25 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Blizzard) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.36 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Drill Peck) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.43 Def + 188 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.21 Def + 202 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
113.73 Def + 202 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
113.90 Def + 202 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
113.19 Def for Florges bulk (Trailblaze) vs Florges (0v0)
113.66 Def for Florges bulk (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (0v0)
113.69 Def for Florges bulk (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (0v0)
113.78 Def for Florges bulk (Psychic) vs Florges (0v0)
113.78 Def for Florges bulk (Chilling Water) vs Florges (0v0)
113.83 Def for Florges bulk (Moonblast) vs Florges (0v0)
113.11 Def + 190 HP for Galarian Moltres bulk (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
113.49 Def + 190 HP for Galarian Moltres bulk (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
113.74 Def + 190 HP for Galarian Moltres bulk (Ancient Power) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
113.74 Def + 190 HP for Galarian Moltres bulk (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
113.13 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Feraligatr bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
113.80 Def + 188 HP for Shadow Feraligatr bulk (Waterfall) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
113.42 Def + 198 HP for Giratina Altered bulk (Ancient Power) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
113.42 Def + 198 HP for Giratina Altered bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
113.42 Def + 198 HP for Giratina Altered bulk (Shadow Force) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
114.04 Def + 198 HP for Giratina Altered bulk (Shadow Sneak) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
113.26 Def + 187 HP for Cramorant bulk (Surf) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.26 Def + 187 HP for Cramorant bulk (Dive) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.31 Def + 187 HP for Cramorant bulk (Fly) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.77 Def + 188 HP for Cramorant bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Snarl) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Dragon Tail) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.01 Def + 197 HP for Rillaboom bulk (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.14 Def + 197 HP for Rillaboom bulk (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.17 Def + 197 HP for Rillaboom bulk (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.31 Def + 197 HP for Rillaboom bulk (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.81 Def + 197 HP for Rillaboom bulk (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.28 Def + 206 HP for Registeel bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (2v1)
113.34 Def + 195 HP for Registeel bulk (Focus Blast) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v1)
113.34 Def + 195 HP for Registeel bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v1)
114.02 Def + 195 HP for Registeel bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v1)
113.09 Def + 187 HP for Blastoise bulk (Flash Cannon) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
113.42 Def + 187 HP for Blastoise bulk (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
113.67 Def + 188 HP for Blastoise bulk (Skull Bash) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
114.02 Def + 188 HP for Blastoise bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
113.51 Def for Alolan Muk bulk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (2v2 with bait)
113.89 Def for Alolan Muk bulk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (2v2 with bait)
114.14 Def for Alolan Muk bulk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (2v2 with bait)
113.42 Def + 190 HP for Shadow Walrein bulk (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
113.42 Def + 190 HP for Shadow Walrein bulk (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
113.10 Def for Runerigus bulk (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (1v2)
113.23 Def for Runerigus bulk (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (1v2)
113.95 Def for Runerigus bulk (Brutal Swing) vs Runerigus (1v2)
113.02 Def + 203 HP for Seaking bulk (Megahorn) vs Seaking (0v0)
113.21 Def + 203 HP for Seaking bulk (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (0v0)
113.51 Def + 203 HP for Seaking bulk (Drill Run) vs Seaking (0v0)
114.01 Def + 203 HP for Seaking bulk (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (0v0)
113.11 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
113.19 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
114.14 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
114.14 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Confusion) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
114.14 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Cresselia bulk (Psycho Cut) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
113.42 Def for Annihilape bulk (Close Combat) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.42 Def for Annihilape bulk (Low Sweep) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.42 Def for Annihilape bulk (Counter) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.72 Def for Annihilape bulk (Rage Fist) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.93 Def for Annihilape bulk (Shadow Ball) vs Annihilape (1v0)
112.99 Def + 198 HP for Alolan Ninetales bulk (Psyshock) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
113.13 Def + 198 HP for Alolan Ninetales bulk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
113.37 Def + 198 HP for Alolan Ninetales bulk (Blizzard) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
113.29 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.30 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.43 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Charm) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.62 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.94 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
114.03 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales bulk (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.00 Def for Primarina bulk (Moonblast) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.00 Def for Primarina bulk (Charm) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.30 Def for Primarina bulk (Waterfall) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.65 Def + 188 HP for Primarina bulk (Hydro Cannon) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.65 Def + 188 HP for Primarina bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.05 Def + 206 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.05 Def + 206 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.22 Def + 206 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.22 Def + 206 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.32 Def + 206 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
114.01 Def + 206 HP for Shadow Lapras bulk (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.04 Def for Regidrago bulk (Dragon Pulse) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.04 Def for Regidrago bulk (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.32 Def for Regidrago bulk (Hyper Beam) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.36 Def for Regidrago bulk (Outrage) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.42 Def + 192 HP for Walrein bulk (Earthquake) vs Walrein (1v1)
113.42 Def + 192 HP for Walrein bulk (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (1v1)
114.11 Def + 195 HP for Ampharos bulk (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.16 Def + 195 HP for Ampharos bulk (Thunder) vs Ampharos (0v0)
113.12 Def + 201 HP for Bellibolt bulk (Zap Cannon) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
113.45 Def + 201 HP for Bellibolt bulk (Parabolic Charge) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
114.18 Def + 201 HP for Bellibolt bulk (Discharge) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
113.13 Def for Dondozo bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (2v1 no bait)
113.84 Def for Dondozo bulk (Surf) vs Dondozo (2v1 no bait)
113.96 Def for Dondozo bulk (Outrage) vs Dondozo (2v1 no bait)
114.22 Def for Dondozo bulk (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (2v1 no bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

172.31 Atk + 188 HP flips Melmetal (0v0) [4009 IVs]
172.31 Atk + 190 HP flips Galarian Moltres (0v0) [3795 IVs]
175.88 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v1) [3310 IVs]
183.32 Atk + 190 HP flips Virizion (0v0) [57 IVs]
172.31 Atk + 188 HP flips Blastoise (2v1 no bait) [4009 IVs]
172.31 Atk + 188 HP flips Shadow Empoleon (2v1 no bait) [4009 IVs]
180.94 Atk flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (2v1 no bait) [677 IVs]
172.31 Atk + 188 HP flips Registeel (1v0) [4009 IVs]
172.31 Atk flips Steelix (2v1) [4088 IVs]
183.61 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v1) [52 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v1)
vs Blastoise (1v1)
vs Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (2v1)
vs Virizion (0v0)

Member IVs (17)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/1/5 👑	184.14	114.89	192	#3364	+0	-24.4	-14.0	-18.1
15/0/6 👑	184.14	114.24	193	#3367	+0	-24.5	-13.9	-18.0
12/0/0 👑	183.98	115.91	191	#3470	+0	-27.3	-15.5	-18.1
15/3/2 👑	184.14	116.19	190	#3544	+0	-24.0	-16.5	-21.2
15/0/3 👑	184.82	114.66	191	#3602	+0	-25.1	-19.2	-17.4
13/0/1 👑	184.27	115.50	191	#3643	+0	-27.4	-16.0	-18.7
15/0/5	184.14	114.24	192	#3688	+0	-25.5	-14.8	-19.8
14/0/2 👑	184.55	115.08	191	#3717	+0	-25.8	-14.8	-20.8
15/1/4	184.14	114.89	191	#3903	+0	-26.9	-19.6	-21.6
15/0/2	184.82	114.66	190	#3963	+0	-26.2	-20.9	-21.0
13/0/0	184.27	115.50	190	#3980	+0	-28.9	-21.2	-21.5
15/2/2	184.14	115.54	190	#3983	+0	-28.9	-21.2	-21.6
15/2/3	184.14	115.54	190	#3984	+0	-28.9	-21.2	-21.6
14/0/1	184.55	115.08	190	#4049	+0	-27.3	-20.8	-24.5
15/0/4	184.14	114.24	191	#4060	+0	-28.3	-20.5	-23.3
15/1/2	184.14	114.89	190	#4070	+0	-28.4	-21.2	-25.3
15/1/3	184.14	114.89	190	#4071	+0	-28.4	-21.2	-25.3

Fortified Feraligatr (124.89+ Def) · def≥124.89, hp≥194 (93 IV spreads)

Clears 219 anchors across 7 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Annihilape, Bellibolt, Blastoise, +31 more. Matchup flips vs Mimikyu (1 scenario, 143 IVs).

113.23 Def + 191 HP for Tinkaton (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
113.59 Def + 190 HP for Tinkaton (Flash Cannon) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
113.84 Def + 190 HP for Tinkaton (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
114.02 Def + 191 HP for Tinkaton (Bulldoze) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
114.36 Def + 190 HP for Tinkaton (Heavy Slam) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
119.41 Def + 189 HP for Tinkaton (Rock Smash) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 1v2)
113.19 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.33 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.48 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Superpower) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.52 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.57 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.64 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Outrage) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
114.34 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
123.97 Def + 196 HP for Shadow Snorlax (Zen Headbutt) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v1)
113.10 Def + 187 HP for Melmetal (Rock Slide) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.35 Def + 187 HP for Melmetal (Superpower) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.46 Def + 187 HP for Melmetal (Thunderbolt) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.46 Def + 187 HP for Melmetal (Dynamic Punch) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.74 Def + 188 HP for Melmetal (Hyper Beam) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.78 Def + 188 HP for Melmetal (Flash Cannon) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
114.48 Def + 189 HP for Melmetal (Double Iron Bash) vs Melmetal (0v0, 2v1)
113.36 Def + 199 HP for Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
113.89 Def + 198 HP for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
114.04 Def + 198 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
114.84 Def + 198 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
115.14 Def + 199 HP for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
124.06 Def + 198 HP for Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Empoleon (0v1 with bait)
112.99 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.12 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.25 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.36 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
113.43 Def + 188 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)
115.79 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2 with bait)
117.90 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Empoleon (Steel Wing) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2 with bait)
113.21 Def + 197 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
113.73 Def + 195 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
113.90 Def + 197 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
124.53 Def for Mimikyu (Shadow Claw) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
124.53 Def for Mimikyu (Hex) vs Mimikyu (1v1)
113.19 Def + 188 HP for Florges (Trailblaze) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
113.66 Def for Florges (Disarming Voice) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
113.69 Def + 188 HP for Florges (Petal Blizzard) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
113.78 Def + 192 HP for Florges (Psychic) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
113.78 Def + 193 HP for Florges (Chilling Water) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
113.83 Def + 192 HP for Florges (Moonblast) vs Florges (0v0, 0v1)
114.43 Def for Florges (Vine Whip) vs Florges (0v0)
120.15 Def for Florges (Razor Leaf) vs Florges (0v1)
120.15 Def for Florges (Fairy Wind) vs Florges (0v1)
113.11 Def + 189 HP for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 0v1)
113.49 Def + 187 HP for Galarian Moltres (Payback) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 0v1)
113.74 Def + 188 HP for Galarian Moltres (Ancient Power) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 0v1)
113.74 Def + 188 HP for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0, 0v1)
116.59 Def for Galarian Moltres (Sucker Punch) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
116.59 Def for Galarian Moltres (Wing Attack) vs Galarian Moltres (0v0)
113.13 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
113.80 Def + 188 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Waterfall) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
114.35 Def + 189 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
114.60 Def + 189 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
114.86 Def + 190 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
124.15 Def + 199 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Bite) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1 with bait)
124.15 Def + 199 HP for Shadow Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v1 with bait)
122.75 Def for Feraligatr (Crunch) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
123.01 Def for Feraligatr (Hydro Pump) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
124.15 Def for Feraligatr (Shadow Claw) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
124.15 Def for Feraligatr (Hydro Cannon) vs Feraligatr (1v1, 1v2)
113.42 Def + 193 HP for Giratina Altered (Ancient Power) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
113.42 Def + 193 HP for Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
113.42 Def + 193 HP for Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
114.04 Def + 193 HP for Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
113.26 Def + 187 HP for Cramorant (Surf) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.26 Def + 187 HP for Cramorant (Dive) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.31 Def + 187 HP for Cramorant (Fly) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.77 Def + 188 HP for Cramorant (Hydro Pump) vs Cramorant (1v1, 1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord (Snarl) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord (Dragon Tail) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord (Dragon Claw) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord (Crunch) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.17 Def for Guzzlord (Brutal Swing) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
113.01 Def + 192 HP for Rillaboom (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.14 Def + 193 HP for Rillaboom (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.17 Def + 193 HP for Rillaboom (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.31 Def + 193 HP for Rillaboom (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.81 Def + 193 HP for Rillaboom (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
119.50 Def + 194 HP for Rillaboom (Razor Leaf) vs Rillaboom (2v2)
113.05 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.05 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.22 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.22 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
113.32 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
114.01 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
114.30 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Lapras (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
114.30 Def + 206 HP for Shadow Lapras (Frost Breath) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
117.57 Def + 206 HP for Shadow Lapras (Water Gun) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
114.74 Def + 190 HP for Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
114.93 Def + 189 HP for Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
114.93 Def + 189 HP for Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
115.33 Def + 191 HP for Dusknoir (Shadow Punch) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
115.48 Def + 188 HP for Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
115.67 Def + 190 HP for Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
116.93 Def for Dusknoir (Ominous Wind) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
119.52 Def for Dusknoir (Hex) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
119.52 Def for Dusknoir (Astonish) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
113.13 Def + 200 HP for Dondozo (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
113.84 Def + 201 HP for Dondozo (Surf) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
113.96 Def + 200 HP for Dondozo (Outrage) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
114.22 Def + 201 HP for Dondozo (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v1, 2v2)
119.66 Def + 201 HP for Dondozo (Waterfall) vs Dondozo (0v0, 2v2)
113.28 Def + 191 HP for Registeel (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v1)
113.34 Def + 190 HP for Registeel (Focus Blast) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v1)
113.34 Def + 190 HP for Registeel (Zap Cannon) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v1)
114.02 Def + 191 HP for Registeel (Hyper Beam) vs Registeel (1v0, 2v1)
114.93 Def + 195 HP for Registeel (Rock Smash) vs Registeel (1v0)
119.72 Def + 201 HP for Registeel (Metal Claw) vs Registeel (2v1)
113.09 Def + 187 HP for Blastoise (Flash Cannon) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
113.42 Def + 187 HP for Blastoise (Ice Beam) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
113.67 Def + 188 HP for Blastoise (Skull Bash) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
114.02 Def + 188 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Pump) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
114.56 Def + 189 HP for Blastoise (Hydro Cannon) vs Blastoise (2v1, 2v2)
116.43 Def + 201 HP for Blastoise (Rollout) vs Blastoise (2v2 with bait)
113.04 Def for Regidrago (Dragon Pulse) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.04 Def for Regidrago (Dragon Energy) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.32 Def for Regidrago (Hyper Beam) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.36 Def for Regidrago (Outrage) vs Regidrago (0v1)
119.21 Def for Regidrago (Vise Grip) vs Regidrago (0v1)
120.58 Def for Regidrago (Dragon Breath) vs Regidrago (0v1)
120.58 Def for Regidrago (Breaking Swipe) vs Regidrago (0v1)
113.51 Def + 195 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
113.89 Def + 195 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
114.14 Def + 195 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
114.26 Def + 198 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
114.91 Def + 195 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
117.00 Def + 198 HP for Alolan Muk (Bite) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
117.00 Def + 198 HP for Alolan Muk (Poison Jab) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
117.00 Def + 198 HP for Alolan Muk (Snarl) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
117.00 Def + 196 HP for Alolan Muk (Acid Spray) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2 with bait)
119.43 Def + 199 HP for Clefable (Meteor Mash) vs Clefable (0v0)
119.69 Def + 201 HP for Clefable (Swift) vs Clefable (0v0)
120.19 Def + 199 HP for Clefable (Dazzling Gleam) vs Clefable (0v0)
120.19 Def + 199 HP for Clefable (Moonblast) vs Clefable (0v0)
120.40 Def + 199 HP for Clefable (Psychic) vs Clefable (0v0)
120.53 Def + 199 HP for Clefable (Draining Kiss) vs Clefable (0v0)
113.42 Def + 190 HP for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (1v1)
113.42 Def + 191 HP for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (1v1)
114.87 Def + 190 HP for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (1v1)
114.87 Def + 192 HP for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (1v1)
113.42 Def + 188 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
113.42 Def + 188 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
114.51 Def + 189 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
116.30 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
116.97 Def + 189 HP for Shadow Walrein (Waterfall) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
113.10 Def for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (1v2)
113.23 Def for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (1v2)
113.95 Def for Runerigus (Brutal Swing) vs Runerigus (1v2)
114.36 Def for Runerigus (Astonish) vs Runerigus (1v2)
114.36 Def for Runerigus (Shadow Claw) vs Runerigus (1v2)
114.36 Def for Runerigus (Sand Tomb) vs Runerigus (1v2)
113.02 Def + 196 HP for Seaking (Megahorn) vs Seaking (0v0)
113.21 Def + 197 HP for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (0v0)
113.51 Def + 195 HP for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (0v0)
114.01 Def + 198 HP for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (0v0)
115.82 Def + 198 HP for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (0v0)
121.07 Def + 198 HP for Seaking (Poison Jab) vs Seaking (0v0)
122.31 Def + 197 HP for Seaking (Waterfall) vs Seaking (0v0)
124.53 Def for Seaking (Peck) vs Seaking (0v0)
113.11 Def + 193 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
113.19 Def + 192 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
114.14 Def + 192 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
114.14 Def + 193 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Confusion) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
114.14 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Psycho Cut) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
114.32 Def + 195 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Shadow Cresselia (2v2)
120.41 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Steelix (Breaking Swipe) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1 with bait)
120.49 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Steelix (Earthquake) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1 with bait)
121.26 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Steelix (Crunch) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1 with bait)
121.97 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Steelix (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1 with bait)
123.42 Def + 202 HP for Shadow Steelix (Psychic Fangs) vs Shadow Steelix (1v1 with bait)
114.11 Def + 191 HP for Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.16 Def + 190 HP for Ampharos (Thunder) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.37 Def + 189 HP for Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.43 Def + 192 HP for Ampharos (Volt Switch) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.54 Def + 189 HP for Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.58 Def + 188 HP for Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.78 Def + 192 HP for Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Ampharos (0v0)
114.88 Def + 191 HP for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (0v0)
115.40 Def + 189 HP for Ampharos (Dragon Pulse) vs Ampharos (0v0)
113.42 Def for Annihilape (Close Combat) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.42 Def for Annihilape (Low Sweep) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.42 Def for Annihilape (Counter) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.72 Def for Annihilape (Rage Fist) vs Annihilape (1v0)
113.93 Def for Annihilape (Shadow Ball) vs Annihilape (1v0)
114.87 Def for Annihilape (Night Slash) vs Annihilape (1v0)
112.99 Def + 194 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
113.13 Def + 194 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
113.37 Def + 194 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
115.39 Def + 195 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
115.39 Def + 195 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
115.39 Def + 194 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
118.16 Def + 196 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Feint Attack) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
118.16 Def + 196 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Charm) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 2v2 no bait)
113.29 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.30 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.43 Def + 201 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Charm) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.62 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.94 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
114.03 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
114.59 Def + 198 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
118.16 Def + 204 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Feint Attack) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (2v2 no bait)
113.00 Def for Primarina (Moonblast) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.00 Def for Primarina (Charm) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.30 Def for Primarina (Waterfall) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.65 Def + 188 HP for Primarina (Hydro Cannon) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
113.65 Def + 188 HP for Primarina (Sparkling Aria) vs Primarina (1v1 no bait)
118.75 Def + 203 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
119.12 Def + 203 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Sneak) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
119.67 Def + 203 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Ancient Power) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
119.67 Def + 203 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
113.12 Def + 190 HP for Bellibolt (Zap Cannon) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
113.45 Def + 190 HP for Bellibolt (Parabolic Charge) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
114.18 Def + 193 HP for Bellibolt (Discharge) vs Bellibolt (0v0)
123.17 Def for Bellibolt (Thunder Shock) vs Bellibolt (0v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

113.40 Def flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v0) [4095 IVs]
113.40 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v1 with bait) [4095 IVs]

Member IVs (93)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
0/15/15 👑	171.98	125.34	202	#1	+6	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
1/15/15 👑	172.31	124.89	201	#24	+7	-3.2	-3.5	-4.7
0/15/14	171.98	125.34	201	#25	+1	-2.8	-3.4	-4.4
1/15/12 👑	172.93	125.34	200	#29	+6	-3.0	-2.7	-7.3
0/14/12	172.60	125.13	200	#31	+6	-4.1	-2.9	-7.7
2/15/13 👑	173.25	124.89	200	#45	+7	-3.4	-1.1	-7.6
1/13/5 👑	174.65	125.26	196	#47	+0	-3.4	+0.1	-14.1
1/15/2 👑	174.65	126.59	194	#49	+0	-1.3	-1.3	-10.6
0/15/12	171.98	125.34	200	#60	+0	-3.9	-3.9	-7.7
0/15/13	171.98	125.34	200	#61	+0	-3.9	-3.9	-7.7
1/15/13	172.31	124.89	200	#69	+5	-4.5	-4.0	-7.8
1/15/14	172.31	124.89	200	#70	+5	-4.5	-4.0	-7.8
0/15/10 👑	172.60	125.79	199	#104	+3	-4.4	-3.8	-11.8
0/15/11 👑	172.60	125.79	199	#105	+3	-4.4	-3.8	-11.8
2/14/7	174.50	125.13	196	#130	+0	-3.8	-1.7	-14.5
1/15/11	172.93	125.34	199	#163	+1	-6.1	-3.8	-12.0
1/14/10 👑	173.55	125.13	199	#169	+3	-5.9	-1.8	-15.4
0/11/1 👑	175.33	125.10	195	#177	+0	-2.8	-2.1	-14.8
0/12/5 👑	174.24	124.99	197	#178	-3	-5.4	-1.5	-15.5
3/15/6	174.82	125.34	195	#187	+0	-3.5	-2.2	-15.0
0/12/2	174.79	125.38	195	#188	+0	-3.5	-2.3	-15.0
1/12/3	175.20	124.99	195	#190	+0	-3.0	-2.3	-15.2
1/13/4	174.65	125.26	195	#192	+0	-3.6	-2.3	-15.0
2/14/4 👑	175.05	125.53	195	#194	+0	-3.0	-2.2	-16.5
2/15/5 👑	174.50	125.79	195	#197	+0	-3.4	-2.3	-16.6
0/14/10	172.60	125.13	199	#205	+0	-7.0	-4.2	-15.5
0/14/11	172.60	125.13	199	#206	+0	-7.0	-4.2	-15.5
0/15/2 👑	174.24	126.98	194	#208	+0	-4.8	-1.4	-11.3
0/15/8 👑	173.15	126.19	198	#221	+2	-5.1	-4.1	-12.4
2/15/12	173.25	124.89	199	#225	+2	-6.3	-2.3	-15.5
4/15/7	175.13	124.89	195	#236	+0	-3.4	-2.5	-15.3
2/14/5	174.50	125.13	195	#248	+0	-4.0	-2.6	-15.4
2/14/6	174.50	125.13	195	#249	+0	-4.0	-2.6	-15.4
0/15/5 👑	173.69	126.59	196	#251	+0	-6.4	-0.2	-12.4
0/13/4 👑	174.24	125.65	196	#268	+0	-5.7	-2.6	-16.0
0/13/1 👑	174.79	126.05	194	#289	+0	-2.6	-2.7	-18.1
3/15/10	174.19	124.89	197	#307	-6	-5.6	-1.6	-15.7
0/14/6 👑	173.69	125.92	197	#313	-1	-4.2	-3.0	-16.5
0/15/9	172.60	125.79	198	#328	-1	-7.4	-4.7	-15.9
1/14/2	174.65	125.92	194	#355	+0	-3.2	-2.9	-18.1
1/14/3	174.65	125.92	194	#356	+0	-3.2	-2.9	-18.1
2/13/2 👑	175.60	125.26	194	#363	+0	-6.4	-1.8	-17.3
0/13/7 👑	173.69	125.26	198	#366	-1	-7.9	-2.3	-16.0
1/15/8	173.55	125.79	197	#409	-1	-7.2	-3.3	-16.7
2/15/4	174.50	125.79	194	#425	+0	-4.9	-3.4	-17.8
2/14/3	175.05	125.53	194	#444	+0	-6.2	-3.2	-17.7
0/15/7	173.15	126.19	197	#445	-2	-6.0	-5.1	-16.5
3/15/5	174.82	125.34	194	#482	+0	-6.8	-3.2	-17.9
0/12/1	174.79	125.38	194	#487	+0	-6.8	-3.3	-17.9
1/14/9	173.55	125.13	198	#488	-1	-9.6	-2.7	-16.4
… 43 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Tinkaton Atk · atk≥181.85 (393 IV spreads) (−184 vs Swampert Atk (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 52 anchors across 7 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Bellibolt, Clefable, Cramorant, +20 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Tinkaton (5 scenario flips).

181.85 Atk for Tinkaton (Powder Snow) vs Tinkaton (0v0)
172.91 Atk for Mimikyu (Earthquake) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
175.08 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Earthquake) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
176.18 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
176.73 Atk for Cramorant (Earthquake) vs Cramorant (2v1)
178.06 Atk for Cramorant (Icicle Spear) vs Cramorant (2v1)
172.30 Atk for Guzzlord (Earthquake) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Icicle Spear) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Powder Snow) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Icicle Spear) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v2 with bait)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v2 with bait)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Earthquake) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v2 with bait)
172.88 Atk for Ninetales (Earthquake) vs Ninetales (0v0, 1v1)
175.63 Atk for Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Ninetales (0v0)
175.63 Atk for Ninetales (Icicle Spear) vs Ninetales (0v0, 1v1)
175.33 Atk for Cresselia (Earthquake) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v2)
177.10 Atk for Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Cresselia (1v0)
178.37 Atk for Cresselia (Icicle Spear) vs Cresselia (2v2)
177.28 Atk for Clefable (Earthquake) vs Clefable (0v0, 1v1)
179.39 Atk for Clefable (Icicle Spear) vs Clefable (0v0, 1v1)
180.53 Atk for Talonflame (Icicle Spear) vs Talonflame (2v2)
181.68 Atk for Talonflame (Earthquake) vs Talonflame (2v2)
172.38 Atk for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
173.20 Atk for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
172.07 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (1v1)
173.20 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (1v1)
179.48 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Icicle Spear) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v0)
181.06 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Earthquake) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v0)
173.84 Atk for Runerigus (Earthquake) vs Runerigus (0v1)
174.32 Atk for Runerigus (Icicle Spear) vs Runerigus (0v1)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
181.04 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Earthquake) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
181.66 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Icicle Spear) vs Swampert (1v2)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Powder Snow) vs Swampert (1v2)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Earthquake) vs Swampert (1v2)
177.72 Atk for Primarina (Earthquake) vs Primarina (0v0)
172.58 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Earthquake) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
173.50 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
178.06 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
178.26 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Earthquake) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
178.78 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
174.51 Atk for Ampharos (Earthquake) vs Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
176.72 Atk for Ampharos (Icicle Spear) vs Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
176.72 Atk for Ampharos (Powder Snow) vs Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
175.64 Atk for Lapras (Icicle Spear) vs Lapras (0v0)
176.73 Atk for Lapras (Earthquake) vs Lapras (0v0)
172.39 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 1v2)
172.92 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Earthquake) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 1v2, 2v2)
172.81 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Milotic (2v1, 2v2)
173.34 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Earthquake) vs Shadow Milotic (2v1, 2v2)
172.64 Atk for Bellibolt (Earthquake) vs Bellibolt (1v1 with bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

175.88 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v1) [3310 IVs]
180.94 Atk flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (2v1 no bait) [677 IVs]
172.31 Atk flips Steelix (2v1) [4088 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (2v1)

Member IVs (393)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
12/0/7 👑	182.66	115.08	195	#2101	+0	-19.7	-5.1	-15.9
12/0/10 👑	182.00	114.66	197	#2107	-3	-16.0	-8.5	-21.0
14/2/13 👑	181.85	114.69	197	#2108	-3	-16.0	-8.6	-21.0
14/2/10 👑	182.53	115.12	195	#2162	+0	-21.7	-5.0	-16.1
12/1/9 👑	182.00	115.31	196	#2179	+0	-20.9	-6.1	-21.3
14/3/12 👑	181.85	115.33	196	#2184	+0	-21.0	-6.1	-21.3
12/4/5 👑	182.00	117.27	193	#2237	+0	-18.6	-13.5	-20.9
14/5/9 👑	181.85	116.62	194	#2240	+0	-18.8	-10.7	-22.0
14/6/8	181.85	117.27	193	#2245	+0	-18.6	-13.6	-20.9
15/2/11 👑	182.78	114.69	195	#2298	+0	-21.0	-8.0	-17.0
15/3/13 👑	182.10	114.90	196	#2305	+0	-21.4	-8.2	-21.6
14/4/11 👑	181.85	115.98	195	#2346	+0	-21.2	-8.0	-21.6
10/0/5 👑	182.09	115.91	195	#2347	+0	-21.2	-8.0	-21.7
13/0/8 👑	182.94	114.66	195	#2360	+0	-20.7	-8.0	-17.0
14/3/8 👑	182.53	115.76	194	#2363	+0	-21.9	-7.9	-17.1
13/2/9 👑	182.27	115.54	195	#2390	+0	-21.6	-8.3	-22.0
15/4/12	182.10	115.54	195	#2400	+0	-21.7	-8.3	-22.0
11/0/6 👑	182.38	115.50	195	#2402	+0	-21.6	-8.2	-22.0
8/0/0	181.90	117.01	193	#2405	+0	-18.8	-13.8	-21.2
8/0/1	181.90	117.01	193	#2406	+0	-18.8	-13.8	-21.2
14/9/4 👑	181.85	119.20	190	#2418	+0	-19.4	-11.5	-23.2
15/5/10 👑	182.10	116.19	194	#2424	+0	-19.3	-11.5	-22.9
12/1/8	182.00	115.31	195	#2445	+0	-21.9	-8.6	-22.1
14/3/11	181.85	115.33	195	#2448	+0	-21.9	-8.6	-22.1
13/1/10 👑	182.27	114.89	196	#2453	+0	-22.3	-10.8	-21.6
12/0/9	182.00	114.66	196	#2511	+0	-22.6	-10.9	-22.0
14/2/12	181.85	114.69	196	#2522	+0	-22.7	-11.0	-22.0
15/3/12	182.10	114.90	195	#2527	+0	-22.4	-9.1	-22.7
13/4/6 👑	182.27	116.84	193	#2548	+0	-19.3	-14.5	-22.9
14/12/0 👑	181.85	121.13	187	#2551	+0	-22.4	-13.7	-24.7
15/12/1 👑	182.10	120.68	187	#2615	+0	-23.0	-14.0	-24.9
14/1/11 👑	182.53	114.47	196	#2658	+0	-22.2	-14.1	-15.9
15/3/9 👑	182.78	115.33	194	#2679	+0	-22.0	-11.9	-17.3
13/1/9	182.27	114.89	195	#2696	+0	-23.3	-11.7	-22.7
12/2/7	182.00	115.97	194	#2699	+0	-22.2	-11.6	-22.9
14/4/9	181.85	115.98	194	#2703	+0	-22.2	-11.7	-22.9
14/4/10	181.85	115.98	194	#2704	+0	-22.2	-11.7	-22.9
10/0/4	182.09	115.91	194	#2707	+0	-22.3	-11.6	-22.9
15/7/8 👑	182.10	117.47	192	#2760	+0	-19.4	-17.5	-23.0
12/2/4 👑	182.66	116.39	193	#2766	+0	-17.8	-15.9	-18.8
9/1/0 👑	182.28	117.31	192	#2772	+0	-19.4	-17.6	-23.0
10/2/1	182.09	117.23	192	#2790	+0	-19.5	-17.7	-23.2
10/2/2	182.09	117.23	192	#2791	+0	-19.5	-17.7	-23.2
12/4/4	182.00	117.27	192	#2794	+0	-19.5	-17.7	-23.2
14/6/7	181.85	117.27	192	#2801	+0	-19.5	-17.7	-23.2
12/0/8	182.00	114.66	195	#2807	+0	-23.6	-11.9	-23.6
14/2/11	181.85	114.69	195	#2813	+0	-23.6	-11.9	-23.6
15/6/9	182.10	116.83	193	#2869	+0	-19.3	-17.8	-22.9
14/4/7 👑	182.53	116.41	193	#2881	+0	-19.8	-15.9	-18.1
10/0/2	182.66	116.28	193	#2908	+0	-19.3	-16.0	-18.8
… 343 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Swampert Atk · atk≥181.18 (577 IV spreads)

Clears 47 anchors across 7 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Bellibolt, Clefable, Cramorant, +19 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Swampert (4 scenario flips).

172.91 Atk for Mimikyu (Earthquake) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
175.08 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Earthquake) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
176.18 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Feraligatr (0v0)
176.73 Atk for Cramorant (Earthquake) vs Cramorant (2v1)
178.06 Atk for Cramorant (Icicle Spear) vs Cramorant (2v1)
172.30 Atk for Guzzlord (Earthquake) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Icicle Spear) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
172.57 Atk for Guzzlord (Powder Snow) vs Guzzlord (1v2)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Icicle Spear) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v2 with bait)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v2 with bait)
176.60 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Earthquake) vs Alolan Ninetales (1v2 with bait)
172.88 Atk for Ninetales (Earthquake) vs Ninetales (0v0, 1v1)
175.63 Atk for Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Ninetales (0v0)
175.63 Atk for Ninetales (Icicle Spear) vs Ninetales (0v0, 1v1)
175.33 Atk for Cresselia (Earthquake) vs Cresselia (1v0, 2v2)
177.10 Atk for Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Cresselia (1v0)
178.37 Atk for Cresselia (Icicle Spear) vs Cresselia (2v2)
177.28 Atk for Clefable (Earthquake) vs Clefable (0v0, 1v1)
179.39 Atk for Clefable (Icicle Spear) vs Clefable (0v0, 1v1)
180.53 Atk for Talonflame (Icicle Spear) vs Talonflame (2v2)
172.38 Atk for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
173.20 Atk for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (0v0, 2v2)
172.07 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (1v1)
173.20 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (1v1)
179.48 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Icicle Spear) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v0)
181.06 Atk for Deoxys Defense (Earthquake) vs Deoxys (Defense) (1v0)
173.84 Atk for Runerigus (Earthquake) vs Runerigus (0v1)
174.32 Atk for Runerigus (Icicle Spear) vs Runerigus (0v1)
179.60 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
181.04 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Earthquake) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1)
181.18 Atk for Swampert (Icicle Spear) vs Swampert (1v2)
177.72 Atk for Primarina (Earthquake) vs Primarina (0v0)
172.58 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Earthquake) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
173.50 Atk for Shadow Malamar (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
178.06 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
178.26 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Earthquake) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
178.78 Atk for Shadow Talonflame (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Talonflame (1v1)
174.51 Atk for Ampharos (Earthquake) vs Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
176.72 Atk for Ampharos (Icicle Spear) vs Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
176.72 Atk for Ampharos (Powder Snow) vs Ampharos (2v1 no bait)
175.64 Atk for Lapras (Icicle Spear) vs Lapras (0v0)
176.73 Atk for Lapras (Earthquake) vs Lapras (0v0)
172.39 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 1v2)
172.92 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Earthquake) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v1, 1v2, 2v2)
172.81 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Milotic (2v1, 2v2)
173.34 Atk for Shadow Milotic (Earthquake) vs Shadow Milotic (2v1, 2v2)
172.64 Atk for Bellibolt (Earthquake) vs Bellibolt (1v1 with bait)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

175.88 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v1) [3310 IVs]
180.94 Atk flips Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (2v1 no bait) [677 IVs]
172.31 Atk flips Steelix (2v1) [4088 IVs]
180.76 Atk flips Tinkaton (0v0) [767 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (2v1)
vs Tinkaton (0v0)

Member IVs (577)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
12/0/7 👑	182.66	115.08	195	#2101	+0	-19.7	-5.1	-15.9
12/0/10 👑	182.00	114.66	197	#2107	-3	-16.0	-8.5	-21.0
14/2/13 👑	181.85	114.69	197	#2108	-3	-16.0	-8.6	-21.0
14/2/10 👑	182.53	115.12	195	#2162	+0	-21.7	-5.0	-16.1
11/4/4 👑	181.72	117.70	193	#2177	+0	-13.8	-9.7	-21.0
12/1/9 👑	182.00	115.31	196	#2179	+0	-20.9	-6.1	-21.3
14/3/12 👑	181.85	115.33	196	#2184	+0	-21.0	-6.1	-21.3
10/1/7 👑	181.43	116.15	196	#2220	+0	-14.3	-6.1	-22.1
12/2/11 👑	181.34	115.54	197	#2233	-5	-14.3	-9.9	-20.0
12/4/5 👑	182.00	117.27	193	#2237	+0	-18.6	-13.5	-20.9
14/5/9 👑	181.85	116.62	194	#2240	+0	-18.8	-10.7	-22.0
14/6/8	181.85	117.27	193	#2245	+0	-18.6	-13.6	-20.9
9/0/4 👑	181.71	116.28	195	#2285	+0	-14.3	-7.0	-22.7
15/2/11 👑	182.78	114.69	195	#2298	+0	-21.0	-8.0	-17.0
15/3/13 👑	182.10	114.90	196	#2305	+0	-21.4	-8.2	-21.6
12/3/10 👑	181.34	116.19	196	#2322	+0	-14.3	-10.4	-20.5
13/6/7	181.60	117.70	193	#2342	+0	-14.3	-9.7	-21.4
14/4/11 👑	181.85	115.98	195	#2346	+0	-21.2	-8.0	-21.6
10/0/5 👑	182.09	115.91	195	#2347	+0	-21.2	-8.0	-21.7
8/0/4 👑	181.33	116.64	195	#2354	+0	-14.4	-10.7	-20.6
13/0/8 👑	182.94	114.66	195	#2360	+0	-20.7	-8.0	-17.0
14/3/8 👑	182.53	115.76	194	#2363	+0	-21.9	-7.9	-17.1
12/1/13 👑	181.34	114.89	198	#2388	-5	-17.2	-11.3	-19.2
13/2/9 👑	182.27	115.54	195	#2390	+0	-21.6	-8.3	-22.0
15/4/12	182.10	115.54	195	#2400	+0	-21.7	-8.3	-22.0
11/0/6 👑	182.38	115.50	195	#2402	+0	-21.6	-8.2	-22.0
8/0/0	181.90	117.01	193	#2405	+0	-18.8	-13.8	-21.2
8/0/1	181.90	117.01	193	#2406	+0	-18.8	-13.8	-21.2
13/2/12 👑	181.60	115.12	197	#2409	-5	-17.0	-6.0	-21.8
14/9/4 👑	181.85	119.20	190	#2418	+0	-19.4	-11.5	-23.2
15/5/10 👑	182.10	116.19	194	#2424	+0	-19.3	-11.5	-22.9
12/1/8	182.00	115.31	195	#2445	+0	-21.9	-8.6	-22.1
14/3/11	181.85	115.33	195	#2448	+0	-21.9	-8.6	-22.1
13/1/10 👑	182.27	114.89	196	#2453	+0	-22.3	-10.8	-21.6
13/5/8 👑	181.60	117.06	194	#2467	+0	-20.2	-9.8	-21.3
12/6/6 👑	181.34	118.14	193	#2472	+0	-14.3	-14.0	-19.6
12/0/14 👑	181.34	114.24	199	#2479	-5	-15.2	-15.1	-17.5
8/2/1	181.33	117.97	193	#2487	+0	-14.6	-14.1	-19.7
15/8/10	181.41	117.67	193	#2494	+0	-14.9	-14.1	-19.9
12/0/9	182.00	114.66	196	#2511	+0	-22.6	-10.9	-22.0
14/2/12	181.85	114.69	196	#2522	+0	-22.7	-11.0	-22.0
11/1/8 👑	181.72	115.73	196	#2524	+0	-22.2	-6.3	-21.7
15/3/12	182.10	114.90	195	#2527	+0	-22.4	-9.1	-22.7
13/4/6 👑	182.27	116.84	193	#2548	+0	-19.3	-14.5	-22.9
14/12/0 👑	181.85	121.13	187	#2551	+0	-22.4	-13.7	-24.7
13/0/15 👑	181.60	113.82	199	#2552	-6	-14.8	-11.6	-24.6
8/1/2 👑	181.33	117.31	194	#2555	+0	-20.7	-12.6	-19.6
15/6/13 👑	181.41	116.39	195	#2571	+0	-15.1	-11.3	-21.3
15/4/15	181.41	115.11	197	#2572	-6	-17.6	-10.5	-20.4
9/1/3 👑	181.71	116.94	194	#2575	+0	-20.2	-10.7	-22.4
… 527 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

General · atk≥172.07, def≥112.99 (4087 IV spreads)

Clears 2 anchors across 3 shield scenarios, covering Shadow Empoleon, Shadow Walrein. Floor across 25 atk breakpoint opponents + 35 bulkpoint opponents. Clears the easiest anchor for every opponent.

172.07 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (1v1)
112.99 Def + 187 HP for Shadow Empoleon bulk (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v1, 2v2)

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Bellibolt (1v1)
vs Guzzlord (1v2)
vs Shadow Malamar (1v0)
vs Mimikyu (0v0)
vs Ninetales (0v0)
vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2)
vs Runerigus (0v1)
vs Steelix (2v1)
vs Walrein (0v0, 2v2)

Member IVs (4087)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
2/8/15 👑	174.50	121.18	203	#2	+10	+1.4	+0.1	-9.2
2/9/14 👑	174.50	121.84	202	#4	+8	-1.4	+0.1	-9.6
0/5/12 👑	174.79	120.71	203	#5	+8	-1.5	+0.1	-9.4
1/6/14	174.65	120.62	203	#6	+6	-1.6	+0.0	-9.5
0/13/14 👑	172.60	124.47	202	#7	+10	-0.0	-0.6	-4.7
2/1/15 👑	176.15	117.68	205	#8	+6	+1.6	+5.5	-11.4
0/12/15 👑	172.60	123.81	203	#9	+7	-0.4	-1.3	-2.2
1/7/12 👑	174.65	121.28	202	#10	+5	-2.1	-0.5	-9.8
1/7/13 👑	174.65	121.28	202	#11	+5	-2.1	-0.5	-9.8
0/6/14 👑	174.24	121.00	204	#12	+5	-0.2	-1.5	-7.8
0/0/13 👑	175.88	118.11	205	#13	+5	+3.0	+1.7	-11.4
0/5/15 👑	174.24	120.33	205	#14	+7	-0.1	+0.5	-8.3
2/8/14	174.50	121.18	202	#15	+5	-2.4	-0.8	-10.1
2/7/15	174.50	120.52	203	#16	+6	-2.4	+1.3	-10.7
0/4/13 👑	174.79	120.04	204	#17	+8	-1.2	+1.4	-10.9
1/5/15	174.65	119.96	204	#18	+7	-1.3	+1.4	-11.0
1/1/15	175.75	118.04	205	#19	+5	+0.9	+1.7	-11.5
2/7/13 👑	175.05	120.90	202	#20	+4	-2.1	-0.7	-13.8
2/2/14 👑	176.15	118.34	204	#21	+4	+4.2	+5.1	-12.1
1/12/6 👑	174.65	124.60	197	#22	-1	-0.7	+1.0	-14.3
1/8/11 👑	174.65	121.95	201	#23	+1	-2.4	-0.4	-14.3
1/15/15 👑	172.31	124.89	201	#24	+7	-3.2	-3.5	-4.7
1/4/14 👑	175.20	119.67	204	#26	+8	-2.1	+1.0	-11.6
2/0/15	176.15	117.01	205	#27	+5	+3.1	+5.1	-10.9
0/3/15 👑	174.79	119.38	205	#28	+9	-4.3	+1.2	-10.3
1/15/12 👑	172.93	125.34	200	#29	+6	-3.0	-2.7	-7.3
3/0/14 👑	177.11	117.01	204	#30	+9	-0.6	+4.9	-11.2
0/14/12	172.60	125.13	200	#31	+6	-4.1	-2.9	-7.7
1/0/15	175.75	117.38	205	#32	+4	-0.9	+1.5	-12.2
3/7/14 👑	175.45	120.52	202	#33	+2	-1.0	+1.0	-14.6
0/0/15 👑	175.33	117.74	206	#34	+8	-1.3	+0.6	-11.4
3/8/15	174.82	120.75	202	#36	+1	-2.6	-0.7	-13.9
0/5/11	174.79	120.71	202	#37	+1	-2.6	-0.8	-13.9
3/11/12 👑	174.82	122.71	200	#38	-3	-1.0	-0.8	-15.1
1/3/12 👑	175.75	119.38	203	#39	+2	-2.7	+1.3	-15.6
0/8/8	174.79	122.71	200	#40	-3	-1.0	-0.8	-15.1
5/13/15	174.79	122.68	200	#41	-3	-1.0	-0.8	-15.1
1/6/12	174.65	120.62	202	#42	+0	-2.7	-0.9	-14.0
1/6/13	174.65	120.62	202	#43	+0	-2.7	-0.9	-14.0
1/9/10	174.65	122.61	200	#44	-4	-1.1	-0.9	-15.1
2/15/13 👑	173.25	124.89	200	#45	+7	-3.4	-1.1	-7.6
0/1/14 👑	175.33	118.41	205	#46	+6	-0.1	+0.0	-12.3
1/13/5 👑	174.65	125.26	196	#47	+0	-3.4	+0.1	-14.1
3/6/15 👑	175.45	119.86	203	#48	+4	-2.8	+0.4	-12.0
1/15/2 👑	174.65	126.59	194	#49	+0	-1.3	-1.3	-10.6
1/3/15 👑	175.20	119.01	205	#50	+6	-3.0	+0.6	-11.9
1/10/9 👑	174.65	123.27	199	#51	+4	-2.1	-0.3	-15.0
2/8/12 👑	175.05	121.56	201	#52	+2	-3.7	-0.9	-14.6
2/9/13	174.50	121.84	201	#53	+1	-4.0	-0.8	-14.4
0/13/13	172.60	124.47	201	#54	+7	-2.6	-3.8	-7.1
… 4037 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Per-matchup IV finder (117 specific matchups - e.g. "which IV beats a given opponent in a given shield?")

Collapsed by default. This is a per-(opponent, shield) lookup: each card is one matchup and the exact IV spreads that win it. For "what do I need vs threat X" use Threats where your build choice matters above, or paste your collection into the scatter. Composite cards (slayer ∩ tier) surface IVs that satisfy a slayer anchor and a stat-cutoff tier; pure slayer-archetype cards live in the Slayer Builds block below, pure tier cards in the Threshold Tiers above.

Show only notable categories (≤ 5% of cohort or ≤ 5 members). Uncheck to see every non-trivial intersection.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Miltank Slayer (12 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Miltank Slayer · atk≥183.881, hp≥190

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +1.0, spread 0.8)

15/0/2 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 114.66, hp 190, SP #4083

One of 12 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Miltank Slayer threshold (atk≥183.881, hp≥190). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Miltank Slayer cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 114.66, hp 191, SP #4030

13/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 184.27, def 115.50, hp 190, SP #4045

One of 12 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Miltank Slayer threshold (atk≥183.881, hp≥190). Trades mirror dominance (114/115 wins, vs 115/115 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Miltank Slayer cutoff.

13/0/1 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.27, def 115.50, hp 191, SP #3933

14/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 184.55, def 115.08, hp 190, SP #4069

14/0/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.55, def 115.08, hp 191, SP #3988

15/0/5 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.24, hp 192, SP #4058

15/0/6 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.24, hp 193, SP #3968

15/1/4 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.89, hp 191, SP #4052

15/1/5 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.89, hp 192, SP #3955

15/2/2 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 115.54, hp 190, SP #4048

15/3/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 116.19, hp 190, SP #3929

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Miltank Slayer (17 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Miltank Slayer · atk≥183.881, hp≥190

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +0.8, spread 0.8)

15/0/2 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 114.66, hp 190, SP #4083

One of 17 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Miltank Slayer threshold (atk≥183.881, hp≥190). Trades mirror dominance (115/133 wins, vs 133/133 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Miltank Slayer cutoff.

15/0/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 114.66, hp 191, SP #4030

13/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 184.27, def 115.50, hp 190, SP #4045

One of 17 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Miltank Slayer threshold (atk≥183.881, hp≥190). Trades mirror dominance (114/133 wins, vs 133/133 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Miltank Slayer cutoff.

13/0/1 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.27, def 115.50, hp 191, SP #3933

14/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 184.55, def 115.08, hp 190, SP #4069

14/0/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.55, def 115.08, hp 191, SP #3988

15/0/4 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.24, hp 191, SP #4089

15/0/5 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.24, hp 192, SP #4058

15/0/6 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.24, hp 193, SP #3968

15/1/2 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.89, hp 190, SP #4088

15/1/3 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.89, hp 190, SP #4087

15/1/4 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.89, hp 191, SP #4052

15/1/5 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.89, hp 192, SP #3955

15/2/2 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 115.54, hp 190, SP #4048

15/2/3 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 115.54, hp 190, SP #4047

15/3/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 116.19, hp 190, SP #3929

12/0/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 183.98, def 115.91, hp 191, SP #3866

One of 17 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Miltank Slayer threshold (atk≥183.881, hp≥190). Trades mirror dominance (113/133 wins, vs 133/133 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Miltank Slayer cutoff.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Swampert Atk (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Swampert Atk · atk≥181.179

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +0.8, spread 0.8)

15/0/2 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 114.66, hp 190, SP #4083

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Swampert Atk threshold (atk≥181.179). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Swampert Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/0/3 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 114.66, hp 191, SP #4030

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Swampert Atk threshold (atk≥181.179). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Swampert Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/1/0 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 115.31, hp 189, SP #4080

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Swampert Atk threshold (atk≥181.179). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Swampert Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/1/1 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 115.31, hp 189, SP #4079

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Swampert Atk threshold (atk≥181.179). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Swampert Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/2/0 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 115.97, hp 189, SP #4018

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Swampert Atk threshold (atk≥181.179). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Swampert Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

13/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 184.27, def 115.50, hp 190, SP #4045

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Swampert Atk threshold (atk≥181.179). Trades mirror dominance (114/115 wins, vs 115/115 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Swampert Atk cutoff.

13/0/1 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.27, def 115.50, hp 191, SP #3933

14/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 184.55, def 115.08, hp 190, SP #4069

14/0/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.55, def 115.08, hp 191, SP #3988

14/1/0 heavy atk weight - atk 184.55, def 115.73, hp 189, SP #4064

15/0/5 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.24, hp 192, SP #4058

15/0/6 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.24, hp 193, SP #3968

15/1/4 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.89, hp 191, SP #4052

15/1/5 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 114.89, hp 192, SP #3955

15/2/2 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 115.54, hp 190, SP #4048

15/3/2 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 116.19, hp 190, SP #3929

15/4/1 👑 heavy atk weight - atk 184.14, def 116.84, hp 189, SP #3919

14/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 184.55, def 115.08, hp 189, SP #4092

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Swampert Atk threshold (atk≥181.179). Trades mirror dominance (106/115 wins, vs 115/115 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Swampert Atk cutoff.

15/0/0 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 114.66, hp 189, SP #4096

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Swampert Atk threshold (atk≥181.179). Trades mirror dominance (99/115 wins, vs 115/115 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Swampert Atk cutoff.

15/0/1 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 114.66, hp 189, SP #4095

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Tinkaton Atk (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Tinkaton Atk · atk≥181.85

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +0.8, spread 0.8)

15/0/2 heavy atk weight - atk 184.82, def 114.66, hp 190, SP #4083

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Tinkaton Atk threshold (atk≥181.85). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Tinkaton Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.