Talonflame Ultra League IV Dive

Opponent list (63 mons)

Tinkaton, Corviknight, Snorlax (Shadow), Corviknight (Shadow), Melmetal, Virizion, Zygarde (Complete Forme), Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow), Mimikyu, Snorlax, Florges, Moltres (Galarian), Feraligatr (Shadow), Feraligatr, Jellicent, Giratina (Altered), Cramorant, Guzzlord, Skeledirge, Rillaboom, Lapras, Lapras (Shadow), Dusknoir, Ninetales (Alolan), Dondozo, Dusknoir (Shadow), Registeel, Blastoise, Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), Forretress, Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), Regidrago, Ninetales, Cresselia, Muk (Alolan), Clefable, Talonflame, Forretress (Shadow), Walrein, Walrein (Shadow), Deoxys (Defense), Runerigus, Steelix, Seaking, Cresselia (Shadow), Steelix (Shadow), Swampert, Toucannon, Milotic (Shadow), Primarina, Ampharos, Cradily (Shadow), Malamar (Shadow), Ampharos (Shadow), Talonflame (Shadow), Bellibolt, Seismitoad, Annihilape, Miltank, Forretress (Bug Bite), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)

Which one to build? [all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (315 spreads, Atk >= 155.00 and Def >= 136.00 and HP >= 165) guarantees 45 of the 81 decision matchups; Build 2 (96 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 42 others; Build 1 wide (672 spreads) keeps 39 of Build 1's 45 guaranteed matchups.

Build criteria: the same control as the one in the scatter strip below; either handle moves both

Talonflame running Incinerate / Brave Bird, Fly.

[all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (315 spreads, Atk >= 155.00 and Def >= 136.00 and HP >= 165) guarantees 45 of the 81 decision matchups; Build 2 (96 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 42 others; Build 1 wide (672 spreads) keeps 39 of Build 1's 45 guaranteed matchups.

No single-stat line on this moveset.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 155.00 and Def >= 136.00 and HP >= 165	315	45 of 81, 0 of them material; 38 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (outside 11%)	8: 0v0 Cresselia, 0v0 Talonflame, +6 more	15/14/14 (281 of 567 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 1 guarantees (45 of 81), its 315 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (6) 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 39% 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 43% 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 47%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 71% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 39% 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 76% 0v1 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 80% 1v0 (9) 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 39%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 51% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 76% 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 85% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 28% 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 86% 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (4) 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 61%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 66% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 71% 1v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 81% 2v0 (4) 2v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 32%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 51% 2v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 59%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (7) 2v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 53% 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 73% 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 76% 2v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 80%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (7) 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 11% 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 41% 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 53% 2v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 74% Members (315), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 155.00 and Def >= 136.00 and HP >= 160	672	39 of 81, 0 of them material; 33 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	14: 0v0 Snorlax, 0v0 Cresselia, +12 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 97% of the same spreads (21 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 315 spreads in 672 of its own, and keeps 39 of Build 1's 45 guaranteed matchups (none of them material). The 6 it gives up out here: 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 18%), 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (grid 34%) and 2v0 Dondozo (grid 37%), and 3 more.
Build 2 (fork)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 96 spreads by list	96	42 of 81, 3 of them material; 35 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Seaking (outside 42%)	11: 0v0 Melmetal, 0v0 Snorlax, +9 more	6/15/14 (264 of 567 matchups)
What Build 2 guarantees (42 of 81), its 96 members all inside attack IV 6-6, defense IV 7-15, HP IV 5-15; that box also holds 3 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (6) 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 42% 0v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 55% 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 72% 0v0 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 74%; material 0v1 (3) 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 78% 0v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 78%; material 0v1 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 81% 1v0 (9) 1v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 49% 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 53% 1v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 54% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 77% 1v1 (4) 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 87% 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (5) 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 63%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 68% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 72% 1v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 82%; material 2v0 (4) 2v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 42% 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 62%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (6) 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 74% 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 77% 2v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 81%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 81% 2v2 (5) 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 44% 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 55% 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 80% Members (96), highest stat product first

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 155.00 and Def >= 136.00 and HP >= 165	315	18 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 45 of 81 overall, 0 of them material; 38 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (outside 11%)	8: 0v0 Cresselia, 0v0 Talonflame, +6 more	15/15/14 (87 of 189 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 1 guarantees (18 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 45 of 81 overall), its 315 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (6) 0v0 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 39% 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 43% 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 47%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 71% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 39% 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 76% 0v1 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 80% 1v0 (9) 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 39%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 51% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 76% 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 85% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 28% 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 86% 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (4) 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 61%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 66% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 71% 1v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 81% 2v0 (4) 2v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 32%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 51% 2v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 59%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (7) 2v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 53% 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 73% 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 76% 2v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 80%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (7) 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 11% 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 41% 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 53% 2v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 74% Members (315), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 155.00 and Def >= 136.00 and HP >= 160	693	15 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 38 of 81 overall, 0 of them material; 31 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	15: 0v0 Snorlax, 0v0 Cresselia, +13 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 315 spreads in 693 of its own, and keeps 15 of Build 1's 18 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (38 of its 45 overall, none of them material). The 7 it gives up out here: 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 18%), 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (grid 34%) and 2v0 Dondozo (grid 37%), and 4 more.
Build 2 (fork)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 99 spreads by list	99	15 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 41 of 81 overall, 3 of them material; 33 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Seaking (outside 42%)	12: 0v0 Melmetal, 0v0 Snorlax, +10 more	6/15/14 (79 of 189 matchups)
What Build 2 guarantees (15 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 41 of 81 overall), its 99 members all inside attack IV 6-6, defense IV 7-15, HP IV 5-15; that box also holds 0 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (6) 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 42% 0v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 55% 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 72% 0v0 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 74%; material 0v1 (3) 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 78% 0v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 78%; material 0v1 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 81% 1v0 (8) 1v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 49% 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 52% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 77% 1v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 87% 1v1 (4) 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (5) 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 63%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 68% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 72% 1v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 82%; material 2v0 (4) 2v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 42% 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 54%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 62%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (6) 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 74% 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 77% 2v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 81%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 81% 2v2 (5) 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 44% 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 55% 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 80% Members (99), highest stat product first

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 152.90 and Def >= 134.00 and HP >= 165	550	5 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 34 of 81 overall, 0 of them material; 27 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (outside 24%)	9: 0v0 Cresselia, 0v0 Seaking, +7 more	15/11/14 (30 of 63 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 1 guarantees (5 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 34 of 81 overall), its 550 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (3) 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 69% 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 86% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 75% 0v1 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 78% 1v0 (8) 1v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 74% 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 84% 1v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 86% 1v1 (5) 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 24% 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 85% 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 86%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 (4) 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 58%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 64% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 69% 1v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 80% 2v0 (3) 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 48%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 57%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (5) 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 71% 2v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 78%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 78% 2v1 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 84% 2v2 (4) 2v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 72% 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 78% Members (550), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 152.90	2560	4 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 13 of 81 overall, 0 of them material; 7 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	30: 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow), 0v0 Cresselia, +28 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 550 spreads in 2560 of its own, and keeps 4 of Build 1's 5 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (13 of its 34 overall, none of them material). The 21 it gives up out here: 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (grid 34%), 2v0 Steelix (grid 55%) and 1v0 Muk (Alolan) (grid 55%), and 18 more.
Build 2 (fork)	Atk <= 148.00 and Def >= 134.00 and HP >= 165	55	3 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 27 of 81 overall, 2 of them material; 23 hold under every opponent-IV mode	1v1 Clefable (outside 24%)	16: 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), 0v0 Walrein (Shadow), +14 more	0/13/14 (26 of 63 matchups)
What Build 2 guarantees (3 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 27 of 81 overall), its 55 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (3) 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 42% 0v0 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 56%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 73% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 78% 0v1 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 79%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (8) 1v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 49% 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 53% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 77% 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 86% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Clefable (rank 37) -- outside 24% 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 33% 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 87% 1v2 (4) 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 68% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 73%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 82%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 82% 2v0 (2) 2v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 43% 2v1 (2) 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 78% 2v1 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 86% 2v2 (3) 2v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 76% Members (55), highest stat product first

Rates: outside N% is the share of the spreads NOT in that build that win the same matchup anyway; grid N% (the Notable spreads list and the cards at the top of the page) is the share of all the spreads on the grid. Weight follows the rate: bold = fewer than half of them win it; bold and underlined = fewer than a quarter; bold, underlined and italic = fewer than a tenth; dim = more than nine in ten win it anyway.

Each build's guarantee list is sorted by outside rate: how often the spreads NOT in that build win the same matchup anyway. The lower the rate, the rarer the guarantee.

Against the 30 spreads the mirror-slayer protocol converges on for Talonflame (attack-first here), no attack on this grid wins charge-move priority against even half of them.

Is mine in one of these?

Paste your Poke Genie CSV, or add one spread by hand, in Check my collection below; the answer comes back here, grouped by build, and your collection stays in your browser.

Shield scenario:

Y: Color:

Stat-product rank against matchups won with PvPoke-default opponent IVs at the league cap over the whole opponent pool and, with Shield scenario on all, every baked shield state -- the view the single-stat line in the expander below was derived on. The Shield scenario selector on this row is the section's own; the scatter's dropdowns and the opponent filter do not drive this panel.

SP1 15/15/14, 15/14/14

Notable spreads

Every single spread this page names, on one list: the spread that wins the most matchups, the one with the highest avg battle score, SP1, and each build's most-winning member. Entries whose decision-matchup wins overlap by 90% or more are merged, because two spreads that win the same matchups are one offer.

15/14/14 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios) / Build 1's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 1, which guarantees 45 of the 73 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v1 Skeledirge (grid 2%), 1v0 Giratina (Altered) (grid 3%) and 0v2 Cresselia (grid 4%)

What else is true of 15/14/14

15/15/14 (Highest avg battle score and SP1) wins exactly the same decision matchups, so this entry is the offer and they are spellings of it.

6/15/14 -- Build 2's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 2, which guarantees 42 of the 59 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 2v1 Jellicent (grid 6%), 2v2 Walrein (Shadow) (grid 7%) and 2v1 Lapras (grid 8%)

What to do with this: If you already have one of these spreads, build it: each is the top of this grid on the measure that named it. If you are hunting, hunt a build instead.

Wild catches needed to meet one named spread out of the 4096 on this grid: 2839 for a 50% chance, 5678 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

The single-stat line

None of the 6 movesets on this page carries a line. This page is Brave Bird, Fly, and it carries no line; Fly, Hurricane, Flame Charge, Fly, Flame Charge, Hurricane, Brave Bird, Flame Charge and Fire Blast, Fly carry no line.

Line: none
Closest: Atk >= 155.45 -- 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan), rank 25, 316 spreads of 4096 on the wrong side
SP1: 15/15/14 -- wins 281 of 567
Alternative: none (the widest pair that buys anything is already 93.8% of the grid)
Decision width: 0 matchups

No HP threshold decides a matchup for Talonflame running Incinerate / Brave Bird, Fly in Ultra League; build for stat product. The closest thing to a line is 155.45 attack in the 0v0 against Ninetales (Alolan), rank 25. Every one of the 1792 spreads at or above it wins, and 316 of the 2304 below it win too. It is not a build line because 86.3% of the spreads below it lose, under the 97% a rule with one clean side needs, and 316 of 4096 spreads sit on the wrong side of it, over the 20 a near-exact rule allows. The attack and defense axes are not tested on this grid: they carry 16 distinct attainable values in all, and a line needs 20 of them below it.

Bulk does not separate either: the only defense-and-HP pair that buys anything, 131.08 defense, is already 93.8% of the grid. SP1, 15/15/14 at L50.0, wins 281 of its 567 matchups, and is inside that pair. No spread on this grid wins more matchups than SP1 does, so the whole IV decision here is zero matchups wide.

rank-1

Shield scenario:

Why these regions

Why these regions and not others. The set panel below is every candidate region the builds were cut from. Under it, the same grid grouped by which contested matchups a spread wins -- its win/loss fingerprint, not its score -- drawn on the stat planes where a region is a shape; crossing a breakpoint or bulkpoint moves a spread to the next cluster.

The set panel (an UpSet plot: a bar chart of set intersections, Lex et al. 2014). Left: the named sets the lattice was built from (rows, labelled 'spreads in the set / decision matchups every member of it wins') and the candidate regions made by intersecting them (columns -- bar height is spreads, the number above it is decision matchups guaranteed in the shield scenarios this setting counts, and a coloured column is one of the builds in the table above). A dot means the region sits inside that row's set. The letters index THIS setting's own eight sets and are re-assigned when the Build criteria change, so compare the row names across Build criteria settings, not the letters.

clusters

Shield scenario:

Lattice view: 100% of this dive's IV spreads sit at the same level (L50) -- this species does not reach the league CP cap, so it is pinned at the max power-up level. At a fixed level each battle stat tracks a single IV, so attack / defense / HP each take only ~16 values and the panels look like a sparse grid: each visible point stacks the spreads that share a stat pair (up to 16, one per remaining IV). This is expected, not missing data -- the clustering still runs on the full set of win/loss fingerprints.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2304	151.3	136.6	162	#116-#4096	8.6	-
C1	1792	158.0	136.6	162	#1-#3909	11.1	Melmetal (+100pp), Alolan Ninetales (+86pp), Skeledirge (+71pp), Dusknoir (+71pp); trades away Cresselia (-100pp), Seaking (-77pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Alolan Ninetales	14%	100%
Snorlax	51%	43%
Melmetal	0%	100%
Cresselia	100%	0%
Seaking	77%	0%
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	32%	32%
Skeledirge	0%	71%
Dusknoir	0%	71%
Shadow Corviknight	73%	73%
Talonflame	77%	72%
Toucannon	1%	45%
Shadow Walrein	78%	100%
Guzzlord	89%	89%
Shadow Malamar	87%	100%
Mimikyu	0%	14%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	89%	100%
Seismitoad	93%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Alolan Ninetales	51%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	92%	named
Snorlax	47%	wins iff def >= 136.13	91%	named
Melmetal	44%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	100%	named
Cresselia	56%	wins iff atk < 155.46	100%	named
Seaking	43%	wins iff atk < 153.77	99%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	32%	wins iff hp >= 164	85%	named
Skeledirge	31%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	100%	named
Dusknoir	31%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	100%	named
Shadow Corviknight	73%	wins iff def >= 134.45	96%	named
Talonflame	75%	wins iff atk < 160.50	81%	named
Toucannon	20%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	88%	named
Shadow Walrein	88%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	100%	named
Guzzlord	89%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Malamar	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,161,863	94%	named
Mimikyu	6%	wins iff atk >= 160.50	100%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	94%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	100%	named
Seismitoad	96%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2349	151.3	136.6	162	#79-#4096	2.8	-
C1	1747	158.0	136.5	162	#1-#3909	4.9	Melmetal (+98pp), Registeel (+88pp), Corviknight (+33pp); trades away Cresselia (-27pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Melmetal	2%	100%
Registeel	0%	88%
Alolan Muk	27%	33%
Shadow Corviknight	79%	78%
Annihilape	19%	25%
Cresselia	90%	64%
Corviknight	67%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Melmetal	44%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	100%	named
Registeel	38%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Alolan Muk	29%	wins iff sp >= 3,517,698	85%	named
Shadow Corviknight	78%	wins iff def >= 133.61	91%	named
Annihilape	22%	wins iff sp >= 3,557,361	89%	named
Cresselia	79%	wins iff atk < 159.66	91%	named
Corviknight	81%	wins iff atk >= 150.41	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1578	150.1	136.4	162	#278-#4096	9.3	-
C1	2518	156.8	136.6	162	#1-#3909	11.8	Primarina (+97pp), Shadow Ampharos (+97pp), Shadow Feraligatr (+71pp), Talonflame (+41pp); trades away Shadow Snorlax (-80pp), Walrein (-73pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Snorlax	99%	19%
Walrein	98%	26%
Alolan Muk	33%	68%
Shadow Feraligatr	0%	71%
Primarina	3%	100%
Shadow Ampharos	3%	100%
Talonflame	0%	41%
Empoleon	76%	79%
Alolan Ninetales	79%	91%
Shadow Walrein	68%	100%
Lapras	93%	94%
Miltank	93%	97%
Blastoise	95%	97%
Skeledirge	93%	99%
Giratina (Altered)	0%	4%
Mimikyu	100%	96%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Snorlax	50%	wins iff atk < 154.62	100%	named
Walrein	54%	wins iff atk < 153.77	90%	named
Alolan Muk	55%	wins iff sp >= 3,383,395	82%	named
Shadow Feraligatr	44%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	100%	named
Primarina	62%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	100%	named
Shadow Ampharos	62%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	100%	named
Talonflame	25%	wins iff atk >= 157.98	100%	named
Empoleon	78%	wins iff def >= 131.93	90%	named
Alolan Ninetales	86%	wins iff sp >= 3,193,317	91%	named
Shadow Walrein	88%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	100%	named
Lapras	94%	wins iff def >= 131.09	100%	named
Miltank	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,099,533	96%	named
Blastoise	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,080,161	97%	named
Skeledirge	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,099,533	98%	named
Giratina (Altered)	3%	wins iff sp >= 3,721,839	99%	named
Mimikyu	98%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	256	147.9	136.6	162	#797-#4096	2.4	-
C1	3840	154.6	136.6	162	#1-#4095	5.1	Alolan Muk (+100pp), Walrein (+100pp), Galarian Moltres (+93pp), Alolan Ninetales (+30pp); trades away Clefable (-80pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Malamar	26%	45%
Shadow Dusknoir	34%	34%
Clefable	100%	20%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	16%	16%
Alolan Ninetales	59%	89%
Galarian Moltres	0%	93%
Snorlax	2%	7%
Alolan Muk	0%	100%
Walrein	0%	100%
Swampert	0%	7%
Skeledirge	0%	3%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Malamar	43%	wins iff sp >= 3,441,749	85%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	34%	wins iff hp >= 164	85%	named
Clefable	25%	wins iff atk < 151.25	100%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	16%	wins iff def >= 142.01	96%	named
Alolan Ninetales	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,219,538	92%	named
Galarian Moltres	88%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	100%	named
Snorlax	7%	wins iff atk >= 160.50	99%	named
Alolan Muk	94%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	100%	named
Walrein	94%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	100%	named
Swampert	6%	wins iff atk >= 160.50	100%	named
Skeledirge	2%	wins iff sp >= 3,719,253	99%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	750	154.0	133.2	158	#1656-#4096	2.1	-
C1	3346	154.2	137.3	163	#1-#3957	4.4	Ninetales (+95pp), Melmetal (+89pp), Shadow Cresselia (+65pp), Shadow Corviknight (+46pp); trades away Deoxys (Defense) (-88pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Cresselia	10%	75%
Shadow Corviknight	31%	77%
Melmetal	0%	89%
Rillaboom	64%	86%
Ninetales	5%	100%
Deoxys (Defense)	89%	1%
Cresselia	11%	13%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Cresselia	64%	wins iff atk >= 151.25	89%	named
Shadow Corviknight	69%	wins iff def >= 134.45	100%	named
Melmetal	73%	wins iff hp >= 159	86%	named
Rillaboom	82%	wins iff atk < 159.66	94%	named
Ninetales	82%	wins iff sp >= 3,213,911	88%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	17%	wins iff sp < 3,213,911	88%	named
Cresselia	12%	wins iff atk >= 159.66	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1536	150.0	136.5	162	#278-#4096	3.1	-
C1	2560	156.7	136.6	162	#1-#4025	5.5	Giratina (Altered) (+100pp), Steelix (+88pp), Primarina (+62pp), Dondozo (+58pp); trades away Cramorant (-90pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Steelix	0%	88%
Cramorant	100%	10%
Giratina (Altered)	0%	100%
Dondozo	1%	58%
Primarina	38%	100%
Shadow Ampharos	78%	100%
Shadow Steelix	96%	96%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Steelix	55%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	92%	named
Cramorant	44%	wins iff atk < 153.77	100%	named
Giratina (Altered)	62%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	100%	named
Dondozo	37%	wins iff sp >= 3,486,328	81%	named
Primarina	77%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	86%	named
Shadow Ampharos	92%	wins iff sp >= 3,196,218	96%	named
Shadow Steelix	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,098,045	97%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1811	150.5	136.4	162	#290-#4096	6.5	-
C1	2285	157.1	136.7	162	#1-#3991	10.1	Cramorant (+97pp), Bellibolt (+90pp), Runerigus (+56pp), Zygarde (Complete Forme) (+42pp); trades away Snorlax (-28pp), Seaking (-25pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Bellibolt	0%	90%
Cramorant	2%	99%
Runerigus	44%	100%
Shadow Ampharos	78%	78%
Snorlax	93%	66%
Empoleon	20%	23%
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	58%	100%
Feraligatr	0%	34%
Guzzlord	58%	100%
Seaking	100%	75%
Ampharos	0%	22%
Lapras	7%	9%
Shadow Steelix	7%	9%
Jellicent	0%	11%
Primarina	93%	94%
Walrein	90%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Bellibolt	50%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	100%	named
Cramorant	56%	wins iff atk >= 153.77	100%	named
Runerigus	75%	wins iff atk >= 151.25	100%	named
Shadow Ampharos	78%	wins iff sp >= 3,253,197	86%	named
Snorlax	78%	wins iff def >= 136.13	78%	named
Empoleon	21%	wins iff sp >= 3,593,767	87%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	81%	wins iff atk >= 150.41	100%	named
Feraligatr	19%	wins iff atk >= 158.82	100%	named
Guzzlord	81%	wins iff atk >= 150.41	100%	named
Seaking	86%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Ampharos	12%	wins iff atk >= 159.66	100%	named
Lapras	8%	wins iff sp >= 3,699,426	94%	named
Shadow Steelix	8%	wins iff hp < 157	94%	named
Jellicent	6%	wins iff sp >= 3,670,136	97%	named
Primarina	94%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Walrein	96%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3921	154.0	136.3	162	#13-#4096	4.9	-
C1	175	157.8	142.4	164	#1-#1108	9.7	Shadow Alolan Ninetales (+96pp), Alolan Ninetales (+94pp), Shadow Snorlax (+60pp), Walrein (+57pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Walrein	43%	100%
Snorlax	54%	100%
Melmetal	75%	100%
Alolan Muk	20%	69%
Galarian Moltres	80%	100%
Shadow Snorlax	16%	76%
Alolan Ninetales	6%	100%
Shadow Walrein	6%	32%
Rillaboom	95%	100%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	0%	96%
Cresselia	98%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Walrein	45%	wins iff def >= 136.13	89%	named
Snorlax	56%	wins iff def >= 136.13	100%	named
Melmetal	76%	wins iff sp >= 3,274,193	87%	named
Alolan Muk	22%	wins iff atk >= 157.98	88%	named
Galarian Moltres	81%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	93%	named
Shadow Snorlax	18%	wins iff sp >= 3,590,683	90%	named
Alolan Ninetales	10%	wins iff def >= 142.01	97%	named
Shadow Walrein	7%	wins iff sp >= 3,721,839	95%	named
Rillaboom	96%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	4%	wins iff sp >= 3,726,277	96%	named
Cresselia	98%	wins iff sp >= 3,060,789	98%	named

all scenarios: 92 win/loss bits (one per contested opponent per scenario) concatenated across 8 of 9 shield scenarios (0v2 excluded as degenerate); 1976 distinct win patterns; K=2 clusters (silhouette 0.41); split at atk 155.04.

Sharpest single scenarios on this page: 2v0 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.76 over 7 contested opponents, split atk 152.51) and 1v2 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.68 over 7 contested opponents, split hp 160.50) -- pick them in the dropdown above.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2304	151.3	136.6	162	#116-#4096	45.4	-
C1	1792	158.0	136.6	162	#1-#3909	59.3	Melmetal [0v0] (+100pp), Melmetal [0v1] (+100pp), Shadow Feraligatr [1v0] (+100pp), Bellibolt [2v1] (+89pp); trades away Cresselia [0v0] (-100pp), Shadow Snorlax [1v0] (-89pp), Cramorant [2v0] (-78pp), Seaking [0v0] (-77pp)

Per-cluster win rates vs each contested opponent

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Snorlax [1v0]	89%	0%
Bellibolt [2v1]	11%	100%
Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	14%	100%
Snorlax [0v0]	51%	43%
Walrein [1v0]	82%	18%
Steelix [2v0]	29%	88%
Walrein [2v2]	45%	45%
Alolan Muk [1v0]	45%	67%
Melmetal [0v0]	0%	100%
Cresselia [0v0]	100%	0%
Melmetal [0v1]	0%	100%
Shadow Feraligatr [1v0]	0%	100%
Cramorant [2v0]	78%	0%
Cramorant [2v1]	22%	100%
Snorlax [2v2]	56%	56%
Shadow Malamar [1v1]	35%	54%
Seaking [0v0]	77%	0%
Registeel [0v1]	0%	86%
Primarina [1v0]	33%	100%
Shadow Ampharos [1v0]	33%	100%
Giratina (Altered) [2v0]	33%	100%
Dondozo [2v0]	15%	65%
Shadow Cresselia [1v2]	47%	85%
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	34%	34%
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [0v0]	32%	32%
Skeledirge [0v0]	0%	71%
Dusknoir [0v0]	0%	71%
Shadow Corviknight [1v2]	69%	69%
Alolan Muk [0v1]	26%	34%
Shadow Corviknight [0v0]	73%	73%
Melmetal [1v2]	73%	73%
Talonflame [0v0]	77%	72%
Talonflame [1v0]	0%	57%
Clefable [1v1]	44%	0%
Runerigus [2v1]	56%	100%
Melmetal [2v2]	57%	100%
Primarina [2v0]	58%	100%
Empoleon [1v0]	78%	78%
Shadow Ampharos [2v1]	78%	78%
Snorlax [2v1]	90%	62%
Alolan Muk [2v2]	5%	44%
Shadow Corviknight [0v1]	78%	78%
Annihilape [0v1]	18%	27%
Empoleon [2v1]	21%	21%
Cresselia [0v1]	90%	64%
Toucannon [0v0]	1%	45%
Galarian Moltres [2v2]	69%	95%
Corviknight [0v1]	67%	100%
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [2v1]	67%	100%
Feraligatr [2v1]	0%	43%
Guzzlord [2v1]	67%	100%
Shadow Snorlax [2v2]	4%	36%
Rillaboom [1v2]	94%	67%
Ninetales [1v2]	82%	82%
Deoxys (Defense) [1v2]	17%	17%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	16%	16%
Alolan Ninetales [1v0]	76%	100%
Seaking [2v1]	100%	69%
Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	77%	100%
Shadow Walrein [0v0]	78%	100%
Shadow Walrein [1v0]	78%	100%
Galarian Moltres [1v1]	78%	100%
Cresselia [1v2]	0%	29%
Ampharos [2v1]	0%	29%
Guzzlord [0v0]	89%	89%
Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	8%	12%
Shadow Ampharos [2v0]	85%	100%
Lapras [2v1]	8%	8%
Shadow Steelix [2v1]	8%	8%
Shadow Malamar [0v0]	87%	100%
Snorlax [1v1]	1%	14%
Shadow Walrein [2v2]	7%	7%
Mimikyu [0v0]	0%	14%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	89%	100%
Lapras [1v0]	94%	94%
Alolan Muk [1v1]	89%	100%
Walrein [1v1]	89%	100%
Swampert [1v1]	0%	14%
Jellicent [2v1]	1%	13%
Primarina [2v1]	94%	94%
Miltank [1v0]	95%	95%
Walrein [2v1]	92%	100%
Rillaboom [2v2]	100%	90%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	0%	9%
Seismitoad [0v0]	93%	100%
Shadow Steelix [2v0]	96%	96%
Blastoise [1v0]	96%	96%
Skeledirge [1v0]	95%	99%
Giratina (Altered) [1v0]	0%	6%
Skeledirge [1v1]	0%	6%
Mimikyu [1v0]	100%	95%
Cresselia [2v2]	98%	98%

Green tint = the cluster mostly wins that matchup, red tint = mostly loses; the percentage is the share of the cluster's IVs that win.

Stat rules that reproduce the clusters (in-sample accuracy 100.0%)

atk < 155.04:
  -> cluster C0 (n=2304)
atk >= 155.04:
  -> cluster C1 (n=1792)

Depth-3 decision tree over (atk, def, hp). Accuracy is in-sample (regularized by a minimum leaf size), not cross-validated -- read it as "how well the clusters reduce to stat regions", not a prediction claim.

Matchup flip thresholds (candidate anchors)

The single stat and threshold that most accurately predicts win/loss across all IVs -- misclassifications allowed, so it is a diagnostic and a candidate anchor, not a build target. The "flips at" cutoffs under "Threats where your build choice matters" answer the other question (the lowest cutoff whose 75/25 split is clean) and are usually higher for the same opponent.

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Snorlax [1v0]	50%	wins iff atk < 154.62	100%	named
Bellibolt [2v1]	50%	wins iff atk >= 154.62	100%	named
Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	51%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	92%	named
Snorlax [0v0]	47%	wins iff def >= 136.13	91%	named
Walrein [1v0]	54%	wins iff atk < 153.77	90%	named
Steelix [2v0]	55%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	92%	named
Walrein [2v2]	45%	wins iff def >= 136.13	89%	named
Alolan Muk [1v0]	55%	wins iff sp >= 3,383,395	82%	named
Melmetal [0v0]	44%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	100%	named
Cresselia [0v0]	56%	wins iff atk < 155.46	100%	named
Melmetal [0v1]	44%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	100%	named
Shadow Feraligatr [1v0]	44%	wins iff atk >= 155.46	100%	named
Cramorant [2v0]	44%	wins iff atk < 153.77	100%	named
Cramorant [2v1]	56%	wins iff atk >= 153.77	100%	named
Snorlax [2v2]	56%	wins iff def >= 136.13	100%	named
Shadow Malamar [1v1]	43%	wins iff sp >= 3,441,749	85%	named
Seaking [0v0]	43%	wins iff atk < 153.77	99%	named
Registeel [0v1]	38%	wins iff atk >= 156.30	100%	named
Primarina [1v0]	62%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	100%	named
Shadow Ampharos [1v0]	62%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	100%	named
Giratina (Altered) [2v0]	62%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	100%	named
Dondozo [2v0]	37%	wins iff sp >= 3,486,328	81%	named
Shadow Cresselia [1v2]	64%	wins iff atk >= 151.25	89%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	34%	wins iff hp >= 164	85%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [0v0]	32%	wins iff hp >= 164	85%	named
Skeledirge [0v0]	31%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	100%	named
Dusknoir [0v0]	31%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	100%	named
Shadow Corviknight [1v2]	69%	wins iff def >= 134.45	100%	named
Alolan Muk [0v1]	29%	wins iff sp >= 3,517,698	85%	named
Shadow Corviknight [0v0]	73%	wins iff def >= 134.45	96%	named
Melmetal [1v2]	73%	wins iff hp >= 159	86%	named
Talonflame [0v0]	75%	wins iff atk < 160.50	81%	named
Talonflame [1v0]	25%	wins iff atk >= 157.98	100%	named
Clefable [1v1]	25%	wins iff atk < 151.25	100%	named
Runerigus [2v1]	75%	wins iff atk >= 151.25	100%	named
Melmetal [2v2]	76%	wins iff sp >= 3,274,193	87%	named
Primarina [2v0]	77%	wins iff atk >= 152.93	86%	named
Empoleon [1v0]	78%	wins iff def >= 131.93	90%	named
Shadow Ampharos [2v1]	78%	wins iff sp >= 3,253,197	86%	named
Snorlax [2v1]	78%	wins iff def >= 136.13	78%	named
Alolan Muk [2v2]	22%	wins iff atk >= 157.98	88%	named
Shadow Corviknight [0v1]	78%	wins iff def >= 133.61	91%	named
Annihilape [0v1]	22%	wins iff sp >= 3,557,361	89%	named
Empoleon [2v1]	21%	wins iff sp >= 3,593,767	87%	named
Cresselia [0v1]	79%	wins iff atk < 159.66	91%	named
Toucannon [0v0]	20%	wins iff atk >= 157.14	88%	named
Galarian Moltres [2v2]	81%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	93%	named
Corviknight [0v1]	81%	wins iff atk >= 150.41	100%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [2v1]	81%	wins iff atk >= 150.41	100%	named
Feraligatr [2v1]	19%	wins iff atk >= 158.82	100%	named
Guzzlord [2v1]	81%	wins iff atk >= 150.41	100%	named
Shadow Snorlax [2v2]	18%	wins iff sp >= 3,590,683	90%	named
Rillaboom [1v2]	82%	wins iff atk < 159.66	94%	named
Ninetales [1v2]	82%	wins iff sp >= 3,213,911	88%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [1v2]	17%	wins iff sp < 3,213,911	88%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	16%	wins iff def >= 142.01	96%	named
Alolan Ninetales [1v0]	86%	wins iff sp >= 3,193,317	91%	named
Seaking [2v1]	86%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Alolan Ninetales [1v1]	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,219,538	92%	named
Shadow Walrein [0v0]	88%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	100%	named
Shadow Walrein [1v0]	88%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	100%	named
Galarian Moltres [1v1]	88%	wins iff atk >= 149.57	100%	named
Cresselia [1v2]	12%	wins iff atk >= 159.66	100%	named
Ampharos [2v1]	12%	wins iff atk >= 159.66	100%	named
Guzzlord [0v0]	89%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	10%	wins iff def >= 142.01	97%	named
Shadow Ampharos [2v0]	92%	wins iff sp >= 3,196,218	96%	named
Lapras [2v1]	8%	wins iff sp >= 3,699,426	94%	named
Shadow Steelix [2v1]	8%	wins iff hp < 157	94%	named
Shadow Malamar [0v0]	93%	wins iff sp >= 3,161,863	94%	named
Snorlax [1v1]	7%	wins iff atk >= 160.50	99%	named
Shadow Walrein [2v2]	7%	wins iff sp >= 3,721,839	95%	named
Mimikyu [0v0]	6%	wins iff atk >= 160.50	100%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [0v0]	94%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	100%	named
Lapras [1v0]	94%	wins iff def >= 131.09	100%	named
Alolan Muk [1v1]	94%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	100%	named
Walrein [1v1]	94%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	100%	named
Swampert [1v1]	6%	wins iff atk >= 160.50	100%	named
Jellicent [2v1]	6%	wins iff sp >= 3,670,136	97%	named
Primarina [2v1]	94%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Miltank [1v0]	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,099,533	96%	named
Walrein [2v1]	96%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	98%	named
Rillaboom [2v2]	96%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales [2v2]	4%	wins iff sp >= 3,726,277	96%	named
Seismitoad [0v0]	96%	wins iff atk >= 148.73	98%	named
Shadow Steelix [2v0]	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,098,045	97%	named
Blastoise [1v0]	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,080,161	97%	named
Skeledirge [1v0]	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,099,533	98%	named
Giratina (Altered) [1v0]	3%	wins iff sp >= 3,721,839	99%	named
Skeledirge [1v1]	2%	wins iff sp >= 3,719,253	99%	named
Mimikyu [1v0]	98%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Cresselia [2v2]	98%	wins iff sp >= 3,060,789	98%	named

Rows are ordered by discriminating power (win rate closest to 50%). "Rule accuracy" is how well that single stat threshold predicts the win/loss across all IVs, and is only shown when it beats always-predicting the majority outcome; high-accuracy UNNAMED rows are candidate new anchors. "Named" means an authored anchor names that opponent (alt-moveset / IV-variant rows inherit their base opponent's anchor).

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2304	151.3	136.6	162	#116-#4096	17.7	-
C1	1792	158.0	136.6	162	#1-#3909	22.4	Melmetal [0v0] (+100pp), Alolan Ninetales [0v0] (+86pp), Skeledirge [0v0] (+71pp), Dusknoir [0v0] (+71pp); trades away Cresselia [0v0] (-100pp), Seaking [0v0] (-77pp), Clefable [1v1] (-44pp)

Computed at bake time for moveset INCINERATE / BRAVE_BIRD, FLY with PvPoke default opponent IVs and bait-selective shield play, over the full opponent pool; this does not follow the scatter's moveset / opponent-IV / bait dropdowns or the opponent filter.

How this works

Per shield scenario: an opponent is contested when between 2% and 98% of this dive's IV spreads beat it (everyone else is settled and can't distinguish IVs). Each IV's fingerprint is its win/loss vector over those opponents; fingerprints are clustered bottom-up (agglomerative, Hamming distance, average linkage). The number of clusters, K, is chosen by silhouette -- a 0-to-1 score of how cleanly the fingerprints separate, where above about 0.5 the clusters are distinct groups and below 0.30 the headline says "weak separation" and the clusters are tendencies rather than tiers -- under a parsimony floor (a split must keep every cluster above a minimum size, and the smallest K in 2-6 within 0.03 of the best silhouette wins). Silhouettes are comparable between the scenarios on this page, not between species. Clusters are ordered weakest to strongest by mean contested wins. The scatter panels project the same 4,096 IV spreads onto each pair of battle stats; clusters that overlap completely in score separate cleanly there. A scenario is reported as degenerate (no clustering attempted) when it has fewer than 6 contested opponents or fewer than 8 distinct win patterns -- on that little data every candidate K scores near-perfectly, which is a measurement artifact and not structure -- and its bits are left out of the all scenarios fingerprint. A scenario that clears the floor but has no split keeping every cluster above the minimum size is reported as fragmented instead, and its bits still count toward the combined view. The all scenarios bits are ordered most-discriminating first, which is the tie-break the linkage uses when several merges are equally close. Replaces the retired score-gap cluster heuristic (2026-07), which usually (~77% of sampled runs) fired on float-level jitter in the opponent-averaged score, and even when it did catch a real tier could not name which matchups defined it.

Evidence

1. Header

Talonflame -- Ultra League

INCINERATE / BRAVE_BIRD, FLY (arm 1 of 6)

Level view: L50. Bake 2026-09-27. Blob 20260927_124605_Talonflame_ultra.replay.pkl.gz.

Opponent pool: 63 entries (Custom pool from ul_top60.txt (60 mons)). Grid: 4096 IV spreads x 9 shield scenarios.

Opponent-IV settings baked: PvPoke-default opponent IVs; PvPoke-default opponent IVs, focal never baits; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits.

Rankings snapshot 2026-09-27.

2. Floor

30 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

30 single-stat values do separate a cell exactly (27 on attack, 3 on Def, 0 on HP, over 104 contested cells), but none of them clears every gate while splitting between 25% and 60% of the grid, which is what an exact line has to do to carry a floor label.

The closest dirty thresholds on this dive, printed as evidence and not as lines:

At the one decimal place PvPoke and Poke Genie display, the top row reads Atk >= 155.4, which selects 1792 spreads where the exact value selects 1792: 0 more spreads land inside a line printed that way. The table prints the exact value because it is the one that selects the set the counts beside it describe.

A split is listed only when it puts fewer spreads on the wrong side than the constant rule does (predict one outcome for the whole grid) and when it keeps between 10% and 90% of the grid on each side.

cell	rank	closest split	spreads on the wrong side	constant rule gets wrong	wins at/above	wins below
0v0 Ninetales (Alolan)	rank 25	Atk >= 155.45	316	1988	1792 of 1792	316 of 2304
0v0 Snorlax	rank 11	Def >= 136.12	363	1941	1941 of 2304	0 of 1792
2v0 Steelix	rank 44	Atk >= 152.93	320	1856	2240 of 2560	0 of 1536
2v2 Walrein	rank 40	Def >= 136.12	448	1856	1856 of 2304	0 of 1792

3. Lines on the other stats

No axis carries a line on this arm, so there is nothing to compare across them.

4. Example spreads

Existence proofs; each selection rule is printed with its spread.

There is no line on this arm, so the rules run over the whole grid rather than over a set of clearers.

No spread on this grid wins more matchups than rank-1 does, so the whole IV decision here is zero matchups wide.

rule	IVs	level	Atk / Def / HP	stat product	contested cells	all cells
most cells won on the whole grid	15/14/14	L50.0	160.50 / 142.01 / 168	99.41% (#5)	95	281
highest stat product (the rank-1 spread)	15/15/14	L50.0	160.50 / 142.85 / 168	100.00% (#1)	95	281
bulkiest (max Def x HP) among the whole grid with SP >= 95%	6/15/14	L50.0	152.93 / 142.85 / 168	95.29% (#219)	78	264

Cells won by shield scenario

spread	0v0	0v1	0v2	1v0	1v1	1v2	2v0	2v1	2v2	total
rank-1 15/15/14	29	8	3	51	30	15	62	55	28	281
15/14/14	29	9	3	51	30	15	62	55	27	281
15/15/14	29	8	3	51	30	15	62	55	28	281
6/15/14	27	7	2	49	27	14	62	51	25	264

5. Rank-1 check

Stat-product rank-1 is 15/15/14 at L50.0: 160.50 attack / 142.85 Def / 168 HP. It wins 281 of 567 cells (95 of the 104 contested ones).

There is no floor on this arm, so there is no line for it to be on one side of.

It is a member of the Alternative target below.

6. Alternative target

Def >= 131.08: 3840 spreads (93.8%), stat product 78.5% to 100.0% of rank-1, attack 147.89-160.50.

93.8% of the grid already satisfies this, so it is not a target to hunt for. Read it the other way round: the 6.2% of spreads outside it lose 1 contested matchup that every member wins: 1v0 Lapras (rank 22).

Rule: among (Def, HP) rectangles with at least 100 members, the one winning the most contested cells with EVERY member that at most 1% of the spreads outside it win, counting only cells against a top-50 opponent in a non-degenerate scenario; ties broken by member count.

Members win 201-281 cells in total.

IV envelope of the members -- attack IV 0-15, Def IV 1-15, HP IV 0-15. Members per attack IV: 0: 240, 1: 240, 2: 240, 3: 240, 4: 240, 5: 240, 6: 240, 7: 240, 8: 240, 9: 240, 10: 240, 11: 240, 12: 240, 13: 240, 14: 240, 15: 240.

Highest stat product inside it: 15/15/14 at L50.0 (100.00% of rank-1), 15/15/15 at L50.0 (100.00% of rank-1), 14/15/14 at L50.0 (99.48% of rank-1), 14/15/15 at L50.0 (99.48% of rank-1), 15/14/14 at L50.0 (99.41% of rank-1).

7. Cost

4 reverse single-stat clean cuts exist (cells won by the low side of a stat).

8. Rungs above

No floor on this arm, so no ladder above one.

9. Material clean cuts

Clean cuts holding between 10% and 90% of the grid, ascending. The widest of them sit under nearly every spread on the grid; the narrow ones at the bottom of the table do not.

cut	cells owned	spreads	settings	mechanism
Atk >= 149.57	0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41), 1v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41), 1v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13)	3584 (87.5%)	2/4	0v0 Walrein (Shadow), 1v0 Walrein (Shadow): Mechanism: BRAVE_BIRD damage steps 123 -> 124 across the cut. 1v1 Moltres (Galarian): Mechanism: charge-move priority against Moltres (Galarian). That Moltres (Galarian) is built at 4/11/11, L29.5, 149.47 attack; 1.0 x 149.47 = 149.47, which falls in the gap (148.73, 149.58] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself.
Atk >= 150.41	0v1 Corviknight (rank 2), 2v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7), 2v1 Guzzlord (rank 19)	3328 (81.2%)	2/4	0v1 Corviknight: Mechanism: INCINERATE damage steps 22 -> 23 across the cut. 2v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme): Mechanism: BRAVE_BIRD damage steps 107 -> 108 across the cut. 2v1 Guzzlord: Mechanism: INCINERATE damage steps 17 -> 18 across the cut.
Atk >= 151.25	2v1 Runerigus (rank 43)	3072 (75.0%)	2/4	Mechanism: INCINERATE damage steps 9 -> 10 across the cut at focal Atk stage -1.
Atk >= 152.93	1v0 Primarina (rank 51), 1v0 Ampharos (Shadow) (rank 55), 2v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17)	2560 (62.5%)	2/4	1v0 Primarina: Mechanism: INCINERATE damage steps 10 -> 11 across the cut. 1v0 Ampharos (Shadow): Mechanism: BRAVE_BIRD damage steps 84 -> 85 across the cut. 2v0 Giratina (Altered): Mechanism: BRAVE_BIRD damage steps 92 -> 93 across the cut.
Atk >= 153.77	2v1 Cramorant (rank 18)	2304 (56.2%)	4/4	Mechanism: INCINERATE damage steps 10 -> 11 across the cut.
Atk >= 154.61	2v1 Bellibolt (rank 57)	2048 (50.0%)	2/4	Mechanism: INCINERATE damage steps 17 -> 18 across the cut.
Atk >= 155.45	0v0 Melmetal (rank 5), 0v1 Melmetal (rank 5), 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14)	1792 (43.8%)	2-4 of 4	0v0 Melmetal, 0v1 Melmetal: Mechanism: charge-move priority against Melmetal. That Melmetal is built at 4/15/14, L25.5, 155.15 attack; 1.0 x 155.15 = 155.15, which falls in the gap (154.61, 155.46] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself. 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow): Mechanism: BRAVE_BIRD damage steps 122 -> 123 across the cut.
Atk >= 156.29	0v1 Registeel (rank 28)	1536 (37.5%)	2/4	Mechanism: INCINERATE damage steps 16 -> 17 across the cut.
Atk >= 157.13	0v0 Skeledirge (rank 20), 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24)	1280 (31.2%)	2-4 of 4	0v0 Skeledirge: Mechanism: charge-move priority against Skeledirge. That Skeledirge is built at 6/15/13, L30.5, 156.50 attack; 1.0 x 156.50 = 156.50, which falls in the gap (156.29, 157.14] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself. 0v0 Dusknoir: Mechanism: INCINERATE damage steps 11 -> 12 across the cut.
Atk >= 157.97	1v0 Talonflame (rank 38)	1024 (25.0%)	4/4	Mechanism: BRAVE_BIRD damage steps 112 -> 113 across the cut.
Atk >= 158.81	2v1 Feraligatr (rank 15)	768 (18.8%)	4/4	Mechanism: INCINERATE damage steps 10 -> 11 across the cut.
Atk >= 159.65	1v2 Cresselia (rank 35), 2v1 Ampharos (rank 52)	512 (12.5%)	2/4	1v2 Cresselia: Mechanism: INCINERATE damage steps 12 -> 13 across the cut. 2v1 Ampharos: Mechanism: INCINERATE damage steps 18 -> 19 across the cut.

10. Bulk

Clean cuts by axis: 27 on attack, 3 on Def, 0 on HP.

11. Coverage

Omitted: there is no floor on this arm, so there is no line to place.

12. Mirror

Against the pool's own Talonflame entry. Seat: our side is the optimised row; the mirror opponent always baits.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 3069 0 0 1024 0 0 4096 4096 0.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 3069 0 0 1024 0 0 4096 4096 0.

shields	win rate over the whole grid
0v0	74.9%
0v1	0.0%
0v2	0.0%
1v0	25.0%
1v1	0.0%
1v2	0.0%
2v0	100.0%
2v1	100.0%
2v2	0.0%

13. Changes the score, not the matchup

Cells won (or lost) by every spread where the battle score still steps by at least 60 at one attainable attack value.

Ordered by how close the step comes to the win line (500), nearest first: the question this field answers is how close a cell is to becoming a matchup, not how large the swing inside it is.

12 of 25 steps are listed, closest to the win line first; 13 more are not.

value	cell	rank	score step	points from 500	outcome
Atk >= 160.49	0v0 Talonflame (Shadow)	rank 56	125 -> 500	0 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 160.49	1v1 Talonflame	rank 38	166 -> 500	0 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 160.49	1v1 Talonflame (Shadow)	rank 56	211 -> 500	0 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 160.49	2v2 Talonflame (Shadow)	rank 56	297 -> 500	0 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 152.93	1v1 Seismitoad	rank 58	391 -> 482	18 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 152.93	2v2 Florges	rank 12	370 -> 472	28 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 151.25	2v1 Regidrago	rank 33	357 -> 470	30 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 156.29	2v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow)	rank 32	358 -> 470	30 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 157.13	0v1 Skeledirge	rank 20	155 -> 469	31 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 154.61	1v1 Florges	rank 12	332 -> 444	56 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 154.61	1v0 Empoleon (Shadow)	rank 9	341 -> 439	61 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 157.13	2v2 Skeledirge	rank 20	219 -> 413	87 (closing)	lost on both sides

14. Not claimed

74 of 104 contested matchups have no clean single-stat rule and are not claimed.

6 of 63 top-50 matchups are listed, one per base species and closest to an even split first; 57 more are not.

cell	rank	win rate over the whole grid
1v0 Snorlax (Shadow)	rank 3	50.0%
0v0 Ninetales (Alolan)	rank 25	51.5%
1v0 Walrein	rank 40	53.6%
2v0 Steelix	rank 44	54.7%
1v0 Muk (Alolan)	rank 36	54.7%
2v0 Cramorant	rank 18	43.8%

15. How sure

27 clean attack cuts, 3 on Def, 0 on HP, over 104 contested cells (186 cells are won by every spread, 277 lost by every spread).

Scenarios barred from carrying a floor -- fewer than 6 contested cells, or fewer than 8 distinct opponent columns among them; the dive page's "degenerate" flag applies the same two numbers to its own stricter counts, so it can flag a different set: 0v2 (2 contested, 4 distinct opponent columns).

Independent check: the dive page's matchup clusters, under "Why these regions", which partition this same grid by whole win/loss fingerprint across all 8 non-degenerate shield scenarios, splits it at attack 155.04 (K=2, silhouette 0.41).

Not measured here: opponent IVs outside the baked cohorts, post-match HP and shields, XL or dust cost, and any live-game check of the priority convention.

16. Provenance

Every threshold in this section is one of three things, and each is badged where it is printed. An EXACT clean cut: every spread at or above it wins the named cell and no spread below it does. A ONE-SIDED GATE: one side is pure and the other is at least 97% pure -- either nothing below it wins (clearing it is necessary) or everything at or above it wins (clearing it is sufficient). A NEAR-EXACT split: at most 0.5% of the grid sits on the wrong side of it in total. The win predicate is gopvpsim.battle.is_win (score > 500; 500 itself is a tie, not a win).

That is stricter than the two numbers the dive page prints for the same opponent: the Threats "flips at" boundary (a 75/25 gate, so spreads on the passing side can still lose) and the Matchup clusters flip table's single-stat split for that one opponent (the most accurate such split, misclassifications allowed). The cluster line in "How sure" above is a third thing again: not one opponent but the stat rule that reproduces that section's "all scenarios" partition of the whole grid.

Priority ties: the coverage ladder counts an exact attack tie as NOT beaten. The engine is seat-dependent on an exact tie, so a tied line is not a guarantee in either direction.

Ranks and opponent builds are read live from the 2026-09-27 rankings snapshot and the current gamemaster; this blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so the render is a function of the blob plus those two live reads.

Auto-derived: this section is generated by scripts/deep_dive_brief.py from the replay blob. No human prose is in it.

How the line was selected (gates and guards)

Decision band for the floor (D1): the lowest ELIGIBLE rung whose clearer pool sits inside [25%, 60%] of the grid. Materiality band for a rung: [10%, 90%].

To be ELIGIBLE AS THE FLOOR -- not to be listed as a rung -- a cut needs at least 20 attack/20 defense/5 HP distinct attainable values below it, an opponent of rank 50 or better outside the caveat list, a non-degenerate shield scenario, a win rate at or above the cut of at least 90% in every setting, and a closed-form mechanism. Listing is a weaker bar: a rung is printed when it keeps 25% of the grid (above the floor) or sits in the materiality band (below it) AND points the same way in at least 2 settings, so a listed rung may be unattributed, low-ranked or 2-of-4.

A cut can fail several gates at once, so the failure tally below sums to more than the number of cuts.

Co-gate sub-rectangles need 5% of the grid; the alternative target needs 100 members; a score-only step needs 60 points. These constants are calibrated on one species and are parameters of the stage that uses them, not tuned per dive.

Floor pool by primitive on the attack axis -- the axis the cross-stat rule selected -- each selected on its own under the same band and the same gates: exact -> Atk >= 153.77 (2v1 Cramorant, 56.2%) rejected on G-material-gap (4 of 4 settings); one-sided gate -> no candidate in the band; near-exact -> no candidate in the band. Selected: no floor. Selection takes the lowest eligible rung in the band; a stronger primitive within 0.50 stat points of it wins the tie, in the order exact, one-sided gate, near-exact. A gate needs 97% of its dirty side pointing the right way; a near-exact split needs at most 0.5% of the grid on the wrong side. Only exact rungs merge, in either direction.

Degradation ladder: rung reached = c. 30 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

Of 30 clean cuts, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-material-gap 30, G-direction 20, G-material-hi 4, G-rank 4, G-material-lo 2, G-attributed 1.

Of 28 one-sided gate and near-exact candidates, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-material-gap 28, G-material-hi 27, G-attributed 25, G-material-lo 1, G-direction 1.

Closest dirty thresholds on cells with no clean rule: 0v0 Ninetales (Alolan) Atk >= 155.45 (316 spreads on the wrong side); 0v0 Snorlax Def >= 136.12 (363 spreads on the wrong side); 2v0 Steelix Atk >= 152.93 (320 spreads on the wrong side); 2v2 Walrein Def >= 136.12 (448 spreads on the wrong side).

band	attack line it selects	cell
[25%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 55%]	no floor	-
[25%, 50%]	no floor	-
[20%, 60%]	no floor	-
[30%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 70%]	no floor	-

Terms used here

build criteria: Which shield scenarios the ranking counts: all nine equally, the three even ones, or 1v1 alone.
build: A region of the IV grid you can aim at -- every spread that clears the same combination of thresholds, at least fifty of them.
guaranteed: Won by every single spread in the region, not by most of them.
decision matchup: A (shield scenario, opponent) pair the IV choice decides: a top-50 opponent that some spreads on this grid beat and others lose to.
wide: The looser rule drawn around a region of the grid: it holds every spread that region holds and more, so it wins less for every member but is easier to hit.
stat-product rank-1 (SP1): The IV spread with the largest attack x defense x HP at this league's CP cap -- the bulk-first spread most IV tools list first. Written SP1 where it is named repeatedly.
material: A matchup no single-stat threshold of a hundred or more spreads wins more than 95% of the time, so it takes two stats at once to claim it.
opponent-IV mode: One of the ways every opponent was made for this bake -- PvPoke-default IVs or the bulkiest ones, each with and without the focal side baiting -- so a claim that holds in all of them does not depend on how the opponent was made.
stat product: Attack x defense x HP at the league's CP cap, the usual one-number summary of an IV spread.
fork: A second region with no spread in common with the first that wins a noticeably different set of matchups outright -- the two overlap on less than 80% of them -- so they are a real choice rather than two spellings of one.
outside rate: How often the spreads left OUT of a region win the same matchup its own members all win -- one the rest of the grid takes anyway is not what you bought.
charge-move priority (CMP): When both sides throw a charged move on the same turn, the higher attack stat goes first.
UpSet plot: A bar chart of set intersections: each column is one candidate region, and the dots under it mark which named sets it lies inside (Lex et al. 2014).
contested matchups: The matchups some IV spreads on this grid win and others lose -- the only ones an IV choice can change.
bulkpoint: A defense value across which an opponent's damage into you steps down by a whole point, or an HP value across which the number of hits they need to knock you out changes.
one-sided gate: A stat value with one clean side: either nothing below it wins the matchup, or everything at or above it does -- so clearing it is required, or enough, but not both.
rung: An attack value above the line at which some further matchup flips for every spread that reaches it.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 160.60 and Def >= 136.90 and HP >= 165	103	51 of 80, 1 of them material; 44 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v2 Talonflame (outside 7%)	9: 0v0 Guzzlord, 1v0 Walrein, +7 more	14/15/13 (292 of 567 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (51 of 80), its 103 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (10) 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 17% 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 27% 0v0 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 35% 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 36% 0v1 (5) 0v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 39% 0v1 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 49% 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 84% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 29%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (6) 1v0 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 29% 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 49% 1v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 66% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 87% 1v1 (6) 1v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 10% 1v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 10%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 11%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 44% 1v2 (5) 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 17%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 74% 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 74% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 82% 2v0 (3) 2v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 45% 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 64% 2v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 68% 2v1 (7) 2v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 23% 2v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 62% 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 82% 2v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (8) 2v2 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 7%; material 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 24% 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 30% 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 50% Members (103), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	~ Atk >= 160.60 and Def >= 136.90 and HP >= 159	221	42 of 80, 0 of them material; 35 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	18: 0v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme), 0v0 Snorlax, +16 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule covers 97% of the same spreads (8 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 103 spreads in 221 of its own, and keeps 42 of Build 1's 51 guaranteed matchups (none of them material). The 9 it gives up out here: 2v2 Talonflame (grid 9%), 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 25%) and 0v0 Toucannon (grid 29%), and 6 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 142.855 and HP >= 169 (bulk box)	58	31 of 80, 3 of them material; 26 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v1 Steelix (Shadow) (outside 6%)	29: 0v0 Melmetal, 0v0 Mimikyu, +27 more	14/14/14 (289 of 567 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (31 of 80), its 58 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 28% 0v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 55% 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 81% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 40%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 85% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 30% 1v0 (4) 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 54% 1v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 66% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 87% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 25% 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 45% 1v2 (3) 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 75% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (6) 2v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 6%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 12% 2v1 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 13% 2v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 29%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (7) 2v2 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 11%; material 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 15%; material 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 31% 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 51% Members (58), highest stat product first

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 160.60 and Def >= 136.90 and HP >= 165	103	24 of 38 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 51 of 80 overall, 1 of them material; 44 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v2 Talonflame (outside 7%)	9: 0v0 Guzzlord, 1v0 Walrein, +7 more	14/15/13 (97 of 189 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (24 of 38 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 51 of 80 overall), its 103 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (10) 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 17% 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 27% 0v0 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 35% 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 36% 0v1 (5) 0v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 39% 0v1 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 49% 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 84% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 29%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (6) 1v0 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 29% 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 49% 1v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 66% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 87% 1v1 (6) 1v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 10% 1v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 10%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 11%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 44% 1v2 (5) 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 17%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 74% 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 74% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 82% 2v0 (3) 2v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 45% 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 64% 2v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 68% 2v1 (7) 2v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 23% 2v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 62% 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 82% 2v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (8) 2v2 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 7%; material 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 24% 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 30% 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 50% Members (103), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 160.60 and Def >= 136.00 and HP >= 161	215	18 of 38 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 41 of 80 overall, 1 of them material; 35 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	19: 0v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme), 0v0 Guzzlord, +17 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 103 spreads in 215 of its own, and keeps 18 of Build 1's 24 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (41 of its 51 overall, 1 of them material). The 10 it gives up out here: 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 25%), 0v0 Toucannon (grid 29%) and 0v2 Tinkaton (grid 31%), and 7 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Def >= 143.70 and HP >= 167 (bulk box)	58	15 of 38 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 30 of 80 overall, 4 of them material; 25 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v2 Dusknoir (outside 4%)	30: 0v0 Melmetal, 0v0 Mimikyu, +28 more	14/15/13 (97 of 189 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (15 of 38 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 30 of 80 overall), its 58 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (5) 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 28% 0v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 55% 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 81% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 40%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 85% 0v2 (1) 0v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 30% 1v0 (4) 1v0 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 54% 1v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 66% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 87% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow) (rank 30) -- outside 25% 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 45% 1v2 (3) 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 75% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (5) 2v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 6%; material; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 13% 2v1 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 29%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 82% 2v2 (7) 2v2 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 4%; material 2v2 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 11%; material 2v2 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 15%; material 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 51% Members (58), highest stat product first

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 160.60 and Def >= 134.00 and HP >= 165	139	6 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 45 of 80 overall, 1 of them material; 38 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v2 Talonflame (outside 6%)	6: 0v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme), 0v0 Snorlax, +4 more	14/15/13 (36 of 63 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (6 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 45 of 80 overall), its 139 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (8) 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 16% 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 27% 0v0 Skeledirge (rank 20) -- outside 34% 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 35% 0v1 (4) 0v1 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 42%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 48% 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 84% 0v1 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 87% 1v0 (6) 1v0 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 29% 1v0 Feraligatr (Shadow) (rank 14) -- outside 48% 1v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 65% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 87% 1v1 (6) 1v1 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 9% 1v1 Swampert (rank 48) -- outside 9%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 11%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 43% 1v2 (5) 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 16%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Cresselia (Shadow) (rank 46) -- outside 74% 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 74% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 81% 2v0 (3) 2v0 Dondozo (rank 26) -- outside 45% 2v0 Steelix (rank 44) -- outside 63% 2v0 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 68% 2v1 (7) 2v1 Feraligatr (rank 15) -- outside 22% 2v1 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 61% 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 82%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (6) 2v2 Talonflame (rank 38) -- outside 6%; material 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 23% 2v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 30% 2v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 83% Members (139), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 160.60	507	5 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 27 of 80 overall, 0 of them material; 19 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	24: 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow), 0v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme), +22 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 139 spreads in 507 of its own, and keeps 5 of Build 1's 6 guaranteed matchups in 1v1 shields (27 of its 45 overall, none of them material). The 18 it gives up out here: 2v2 Talonflame (grid 9%), 2v2 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 25%) and 0v0 Toucannon (grid 29%), and 15 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Atk >= 150.00 and Def >= 136.90 and HP >= 165	756	3 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 28 of 80 overall, 0 of them material; 18 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v2 Tinkaton (outside 16%)	23: 0v0 Melmetal, 0v0 Mimikyu, +21 more	14/15/13 (36 of 63 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (3 of 10 in 1v1 shields; 28 of 80 overall), its 756 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (4) 0v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 30%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 45% 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 77% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 27%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 81% 0v1 Corviknight (rank 2) -- outside 85%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 (1) 0v2 Tinkaton (rank 1) -- outside 16%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (4) 1v0 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 59% 1v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 84% 1v0 Ninetales (Alolan) (rank 25) -- outside 89% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 33% 1v2 (3) 1v2 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 69% 1v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 78% 1v2 Ninetales (rank 34) -- outside 88% 2v1 (5) 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 78% 2v1 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 85%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Guzzlord (rank 19) -- outside 85%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 85%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (5) 2v2 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 41% 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 54% 2v2 Melmetal (rank 5) -- outside 80% 2v2 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 87% Members (756), highest stat product first

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2048	151.7	137.4	163	#160-#4096	7.2	-
C1	2048	158.5	137.4	163	#1-#3945	10.1	Melmetal (+100pp), Alolan Ninetales (+89pp), Dusknoir (+75pp), Skeledirge (+73pp); trades away Cresselia (-100pp), Seaking (-75pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Melmetal	0%	100%
Cresselia	100%	0%
Alolan Ninetales	11%	100%
Snorlax	58%	53%
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	43%	43%
Dusknoir	0%	75%
Seaking	75%	0%
Skeledirge	0%	73%
Toucannon	4%	54%
Talonflame	82%	69%
Shadow Corviknight	81%	81%
Mimikyu	0%	38%
Shadow Talonflame	0%	25%
Guzzlord	88%	88%
Shadow Walrein	88%	100%
Shadow Snorlax	0%	12%
Shadow Malamar	93%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Melmetal	50%	wins iff atk >= 155.54	100%	named
Cresselia	50%	wins iff atk < 155.54	100%	named
Alolan Ninetales	55%	wins iff atk >= 155.54	95%	named
Snorlax	55%	wins iff def >= 136.09	93%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	43%	wins iff hp >= 164	86%	named
Dusknoir	38%	wins iff atk >= 157.23	100%	named
Seaking	38%	wins iff atk < 153.84	100%	named
Skeledirge	37%	wins iff atk >= 157.23	99%	named
Toucannon	29%	wins iff atk >= 157.23	86%	named
Talonflame	76%	wins iff atk < 160.50	88%	named
Shadow Corviknight	81%	wins iff def >= 134.40	94%	named
Mimikyu	19%	wins iff atk >= 159.76	100%	named
Shadow Talonflame	12%	wins iff atk >= 160.61	100%	named
Guzzlord	88%	no single-stat rule beats the base rate	-	named
Shadow Walrein	94%	wins iff atk >= 149.62	100%	named
Shadow Snorlax	6%	wins iff atk >= 161.45	100%	named
Shadow Malamar	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,147,231	97%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1278	151.5	135.4	162	#1242-#4096	2.4	-
C1	1193	158.1	135.8	161	#418-#3945	4.5	Melmetal (+100pp), Registeel (+88pp), Corviknight (+32pp), Alolan Muk (+17pp); trades away Cresselia (-22pp)
C2	882	152.6	140.6	165	#114-#3414	4.6	Alolan Muk (+83pp), Annihilape (+59pp), Cresselia (+30pp), Shadow Corviknight (+26pp); trades away Registeel (-88pp), Melmetal (-87pp)
C3	743	159.5	139.4	166	#1-#1795	6.1	Registeel (+100pp), Melmetal (+87pp), Annihilape (+40pp); trades away Cresselia (-63pp), Alolan Muk (-22pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2	C3
Melmetal	0%	100%	13%	100%
Registeel	0%	88%	0%	100%
Alolan Muk	0%	17%	100%	78%
Annihilape	6%	1%	60%	100%
Cresselia	92%	70%	100%	37%
Shadow Corviknight	76%	74%	100%	100%
Corviknight	68%	100%	89%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Melmetal	50%	wins iff atk >= 155.54	100%	named
Registeel	44%	wins iff atk >= 156.38	100%	named
Alolan Muk	41%	wins iff def >= 136.94	84%	named
Annihilape	33%	wins iff sp >= 3,559,801	88%	named
Cresselia	77%	wins iff atk < 159.76	96%	named
Shadow Corviknight	85%	wins iff def >= 133.56	91%	named
Corviknight	88%	wins iff atk >= 150.46	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1280	150.5	137.4	163	#349-#4096	6.0	-
C1	2816	157.2	137.4	163	#1-#4051	8.5	Primarina (+100pp), Shadow Ampharos (+100pp), Shadow Feraligatr (+73pp), Talonflame (+45pp); trades away Shadow Snorlax (-73pp), Walrein (-66pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Feraligatr	0%	73%
Shadow Snorlax	100%	27%
Walrein	100%	34%
Alolan Muk	47%	75%
Talonflame	0%	45%
Primarina	0%	100%
Shadow Ampharos	0%	100%
Empoleon	87%	87%
Alolan Ninetales	88%	93%
Shadow Walrein	80%	100%
Dondozo	0%	9%
Giratina (Altered)	0%	8%
Ampharos	4%	4%
Miltank	98%	98%

Moveset: Switching movesets reloads the page; pasted CSV will need to be re-loaded. Shields: Build criteria: Opponent IVs: Bait: Y-axis: Color: Anchors: Build criteria weights shield scenarios in: Which one to build?, the all-scenarios clusters, and Shields = All (by build criteria). Nothing else on this page is re-weighted by it. Threshold tiers (e.g. GH Great / GH Good) are expert stat-cutoff regions defined in Threshold Tiers below. Hover legend to isolate; click to lock.

Check my collection - Your collection stays in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Paste your Poke Genie CSV export below, or click Choose file… to load one from disk. You’ll see which of your Talonflames (and pre-evolutions) qualify for each tier, overlaid on the scatter plot.

Show only my mons

Or enter one at a time - Atk/Def/HP IVs (0-15), level, shadow flag. Same format as PvPoke / PvPIVs.

Species Atk Def HP Level Shadow

Compare candidates - up to 7 of your IV spreads, side by side: wins, mirror, and the close calls that decide the build

Add a spread: Atk Def HP 0 / 7 added

Highlight IVs:

Top IVs Rows: Ranked by this dive's battle simulation (not fetched from PvPoke). Click any column header to sort.

Battle-Rating Distribution

Per-matchup battle-rating distribution for the reference IV (PvPoke default or Rank 1, matching the Opponent-IVs dropdown) across the opponent pool, under the currently-selected Shields / Opponent-IVs / Bait.

Incinerate / Brave Bird, Fly

IV Recommendations

Moveset: Incinerate / Brave Bird, Fly. Vs PvPoke default opponents.

IV Flavor Guide (Simulation)

Auto-generated from simulation matchup data. Flavor names (e.g. "Premium Bulk", "Fortified {Opp}", "{Opp} Slayer") are derived from which opponents each IV cluster beats, not from the expert-authored Threshold Tiers section above. This IV Flavor Guide and the Threshold Tiers answer different questions and may not line up 1:1. New to flavor cards? The IV Flavor Guide walks through the six name families and the trade-off layout.

In Ultra League, Talonflame has 4 flavors: General Good, Fortified Ampharos, Snorlax Slayer, and Swampert Slayer. In general, the General Good variation may be the flavor of choice, as it plays up Talonflame's potential vs Dusknoir (Shadow), Malamar (Shadow), Ampharos, among others.

Flavor	IVs	%	Catches needed
General Good [Recommended]	2025	49.4%	~2-3 for a 50-75% chance
Fortified Ampharos	48	1.2%	~59-118 for a 50-75% chance
Snorlax Slayer	192	4.7%	~15-29 for a 50-75% chance
Swampert Slayer	192	4.7%	~15-29 for a 50-75% chance

General Good (147.93 Atk, 130.33 Def, 162 HP) [Recommended]

130.33 Def and 162 HP is a safe baseline for Talonflame, with an attack floor of 147.93 Atk for coverage against key opponents.

162 HP is also a safe spot, enabling key matchups vs Ampharos, Annihilape, Cresselia.

131.09 Def with 162+ HP for Corviknight (incl. Shadow) (0v0, 0v1, 1v2), Dusknoir (incl. Shadow) (1v1), Empoleon (1v0), Lapras (1v0), Malamar (incl. Shadow) (1v1), Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0), Miltank (1v0), Annihilape (0v1)
131.93 Def with 168+ HP for Corviknight (incl. Shadow) (1v2), Empoleon (2v1), Snorlax (2v2)
132.77 Def for the Muk (Alolan) (1v0)
133.61 Def for Snorlax (0v0, 2v2), Walrein (2v2)
134.45 Def with 165+ HP for Annihilape (0v1), Empoleon (2v1)
135.29 Def with 164+ HP for Muk (Alolan) (0v1), Snorlax (0v0), Tinkaton (0v2)
136.13 Def with 165+ HP for Muk (Alolan) (2v2), Walrein (2v2), Tinkaton (0v2)
137.81 Def for the Ninetales (Alolan) (incl. Shadow) (1v1)

Fortified Ampharos (142.85 Def, 167 HP)

The "Fortified Ampharos" Talonflame fortifies its bulk to gain several matchups including the Ampharos 1v0, the Annihilape 0v1, the Dusknoir 2v2. This requires 142.85 Def with 167 HP.

Note: Only 48 IV spreads reach this target, so it may require specific IV luck.

Snorlax Slayer (159.82 Atk, 159 HP)

The "Snorlax Slayer" Talonflame trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Snorlax 1v1, the Ampharos 2v1, the Cresselia 1v2. Talonflame would need 159.82 Atk while maintaining 159 HP.

Note: The drop in bulk will cost several matchups, such as the Cresselia 0v1, Rillaboom 1v2, and Talonflame 0v0.

Swampert Slayer (160.27 Atk, 159 HP)

The "Swampert Slayer" Talonflame trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Swampert 1v1, the Ampharos 2v1, the Cresselia 1v2. Talonflame would need 160.27 Atk while maintaining 159 HP.

Note: The drop in bulk will cost several matchups, such as the Cresselia 0v1, Rillaboom 1v2, and Talonflame 0v0.

Rank-1 Talonflame (15/15/15) meets the General Good thresholds.

Simulation-Derived IV Tiers

Auto-derived from the sim (not expert-authored).

Threshold Tiers

Stat-target headlines from thresholds/*.toml, each grouped with the named anchors its spec clears and the IV spreads that meet it. Within each tier card, bullets are grouped by opponent and sorted by the required stat (Def or Atk) ascending - read top-to-bottom in the order a player would clear them as their stat grows. The flat list of every anchor (regardless of tier) lives in Anchor-Driven Matchup Flips below. New to tier cards? The Threshold Tiers guide walks through what the stat cutoffs and member counts mean. A tier's anchors come from two passes over the anchor list:

Primary bullets - the tier has a cutoff on the anchor's target axis (atk or def) that meets or exceeds the anchor's threshold. Consequences:
- Subset case: if tier A is strictly stricter than tier B on the anchor axis, A's bullet list is a superset of B's. Overlap is intentional.
- Crossed-cutoff case: tier A has only an atk cutoff, tier B has only a def cutoff - neither is a subset of the other. Atk anchors appear only on A; def anchors only on B.
- Slayer-axis IV-count case: two tiers can list the same atk anchor but have different member-IV counts because a stricter tier's def cutoff excludes def-sacrificing spreads that the looser tier keeps. Check the (−N vs parent) callout on the tier header to spot this at a glance.
Anchors we get for free (collapsed) - the tier has no cutoff on the anchor's target axis, but every IV in the tier clears the anchor's threshold anyway. These would be silently dropped by the primary filter; we surface them in a separate collapsed block so the card isn't misleading.

Fortified Ampharos · def≥142.85, hp≥167 (48 IV spreads)

Clears 129 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Annihilape, Shadow Corviknight, Dusknoir, +16 more. Matchup flips vs Lapras, Toucannon, Walrein (Shadow) (3 scenarios, 96 IVs).

134.75 Def + 158 HP for Tinkaton (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (0v2)
136.82 Def + 161 HP for Tinkaton (Fairy Wind) vs Tinkaton (0v2)
136.82 Def + 159 HP for Tinkaton (Play Rough) vs Tinkaton (0v2)
136.82 Def + 158 HP for Tinkaton (Flash Cannon) vs Tinkaton (0v2)
136.82 Def + 158 HP for Tinkaton (Heavy Slam) vs Tinkaton (0v2)
138.20 Def + 158 HP for Tinkaton (Bulldoze) vs Tinkaton (0v2)
130.75 Def for Shadow Corviknight (Sky Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
131.19 Def for Shadow Corviknight (Air Cutter) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
131.39 Def for Shadow Corviknight (Payback) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
131.80 Def for Shadow Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
134.38 Def for Shadow Corviknight (Sand Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v2)
130.36 Def + 159 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Crunch) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0)
130.94 Def + 159 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Hyper Beam) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0)
131.69 Def + 159 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Outrage) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0)
132.32 Def + 159 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Earthquake) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0)
132.32 Def + 159 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Bulldoze) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0)
134.08 Def + 163 HP for Zygarde Complete Forme (Zen Headbutt) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0)
130.39 Def + 159 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Cannon) vs Empoleon (1v0, 2v1)
130.42 Def + 159 HP for Empoleon (Blizzard) vs Empoleon (1v0, 2v1)
130.72 Def + 159 HP for Empoleon (Hydro Pump) vs Empoleon (1v0, 2v1)
130.78 Def + 161 HP for Empoleon (Waterfall) vs Empoleon (1v0, 2v1)
131.58 Def + 159 HP for Empoleon (Drill Peck) vs Empoleon (1v0, 2v1)
131.58 Def + 168 HP for Empoleon (Metal Claw) vs Empoleon (1v0, 2v1)
131.58 Def + 168 HP for Empoleon (Metal Sound) vs Empoleon (1v0, 2v1)
131.58 Def + 159 HP for Empoleon (Flash Cannon) vs Empoleon (1v0, 2v1)
138.16 Def + 162 HP for Empoleon (Steel Wing) vs Empoleon (2v1)
131.22 Def for Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 2v2)
131.79 Def for Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (0v0, 2v2)
131.82 Def for Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 2v2)
132.58 Def for Snorlax (Outrage) vs Snorlax (0v0, 2v2)
132.93 Def for Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Snorlax (0v0, 2v2)
133.03 Def for Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 2v2)
133.39 Def for Snorlax (Superpower) vs Snorlax (0v0, 2v2)
135.59 Def for Snorlax (Lick) vs Snorlax (0v0, 2v2)
135.59 Def for Snorlax (Psywave) vs Snorlax (0v0, 2v2)
139.47 Def + 166 HP for Jellicent (Surf) vs Jellicent (2v1)
139.96 Def + 166 HP for Jellicent (Shadow Ball) vs Jellicent (2v1)
140.21 Def + 166 HP for Jellicent (Bubble Beam) vs Jellicent (2v1)
140.35 Def + 166 HP for Jellicent (Ice Beam) vs Jellicent (2v1)
141.33 Def + 166 HP for Jellicent (Bubble) vs Jellicent (2v1)
130.63 Def + 164 HP for Lapras (Dragon Pulse) vs Lapras (1v0, 2v1)
130.63 Def for Lapras (Psywave) vs Lapras (1v0)
130.63 Def + 164 HP for Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Lapras (1v0, 2v1)
130.63 Def + 164 HP for Lapras (Blizzard) vs Lapras (1v0, 2v1)
130.63 Def + 164 HP for Lapras (Surf) vs Lapras (1v0, 2v1)
130.95 Def + 164 HP for Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Lapras (1v0, 2v1)
134.78 Def + 164 HP for Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Lapras (2v1)
135.12 Def + 164 HP for Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Lapras (2v1)
137.85 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v2)
137.85 Def + 162 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v2)
138.11 Def + 162 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v2)
138.47 Def + 164 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v2)
139.01 Def + 161 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v2)
139.01 Def + 162 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v2)
141.79 Def for Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Alolan Ninetales (2v2)
130.39 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
130.39 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
130.98 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
131.48 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Shadow Punch) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
131.72 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Ominous Wind) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
131.83 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
131.83 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
132.40 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Dusknoir (Astonish) vs Shadow Dusknoir (1v1)
136.67 Def + 164 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1)
136.90 Def + 159 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1)
137.22 Def + 164 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1)
137.22 Def + 166 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1)
137.51 Def + 164 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1)
137.85 Def + 164 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1)
141.79 Def for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Feint Attack) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1)
141.79 Def for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v1)
132.26 Def + 158 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 1v0, 2v2)
132.68 Def + 158 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 1v0, 2v2)
132.95 Def + 158 HP for Alolan Muk (Ice Punch) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 1v0, 2v2)
133.71 Def + 159 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 1v0, 2v2)
134.06 Def + 159 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 1v0, 2v2)
136.50 Def + 159 HP for Alolan Muk (Poison Jab) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2)
137.65 Def + 159 HP for Alolan Muk (Acid Spray) vs Alolan Muk (0v1, 2v2)
131.23 Def + 157 HP for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (2v2)
131.28 Def + 158 HP for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (2v2)
131.98 Def + 158 HP for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (2v2)
132.33 Def + 157 HP for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (2v2)
132.33 Def + 158 HP for Walrein (Frost Breath) vs Walrein (2v2)
133.08 Def + 160 HP for Walrein (Waterfall) vs Walrein (2v2)
136.11 Def for Walrein (Powder Snow) vs Walrein (2v2)
132.92 Def + 166 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
132.99 Def + 165 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
133.08 Def + 166 HP for Shadow Walrein (Waterfall) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
133.25 Def + 165 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
134.19 Def + 165 HP for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
136.11 Def + 166 HP for Shadow Walrein (Frost Breath) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
136.11 Def + 166 HP for Shadow Walrein (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Walrein (2v2)
140.10 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Steelix (Heavy Slam) vs Shadow Steelix (2v1)
140.43 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Steelix (Thunder Fang) vs Shadow Steelix (2v1)
141.05 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Steelix (Crunch) vs Shadow Steelix (2v1)
141.05 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Steelix (Psychic Fangs) vs Shadow Steelix (2v1)
141.05 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Steelix (Breaking Swipe) vs Shadow Steelix (2v1)
141.05 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Steelix (Earthquake) vs Shadow Steelix (2v1)
139.58 Def + 167 HP for Toucannon (Beak Blast) vs Toucannon (0v0)
140.32 Def + 167 HP for Toucannon (Drill Peck) vs Toucannon (0v0)
140.51 Def + 167 HP for Toucannon (Rock Blast) vs Toucannon (0v0)
141.51 Def + 167 HP for Toucannon (Flash Cannon) vs Toucannon (0v0)
130.33 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Malamar (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
130.85 Def + 160 HP for Shadow Malamar (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
131.12 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Malamar (Psybeam) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
131.30 Def + 161 HP for Shadow Malamar (Superpower) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)
131.22 Def + 159 HP for Annihilape (Rage Fist) vs Annihilape (0v1)
131.36 Def + 161 HP for Annihilape (Shadow Ball) vs Annihilape (0v1)
131.42 Def + 162 HP for Annihilape (Close Combat) vs Annihilape (0v1)
131.98 Def + 162 HP for Annihilape (Ice Punch) vs Annihilape (0v1)
132.54 Def + 162 HP for Annihilape (Night Slash) vs Annihilape (0v1)
134.85 Def + 162 HP for Annihilape (Low Sweep) vs Annihilape (0v1)
130.55 Def for Miltank (Ice Beam) vs Miltank (1v0 no bait)
131.36 Def for Miltank (Thunderbolt) vs Miltank (1v0 no bait)
131.67 Def for Miltank (High Horsepower) vs Miltank (1v0 no bait)
132.14 Def for Miltank (Rollout) vs Miltank (1v0 no bait)
132.73 Def for Miltank (Body Slam) vs Miltank (1v0 no bait)
132.73 Def for Miltank (Stomp) vs Miltank (1v0 no bait)
141.54 Def for Dusknoir (Ominous Wind) vs Dusknoir (2v2)
141.54 Def for Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Dusknoir (2v2)
142.29 Def for Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Dusknoir (2v2)
142.29 Def for Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Dusknoir (2v2)
141.21 Def + 161 HP for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (1v0)
141.25 Def + 161 HP for Ampharos (Zap Cannon) vs Ampharos (1v0)
141.90 Def + 161 HP for Ampharos (Thunder) vs Ampharos (1v0)
142.23 Def + 161 HP for Ampharos (Trailblaze) vs Ampharos (1v0)
142.54 Def + 161 HP for Ampharos (Focus Blast) vs Ampharos (1v0)
142.56 Def + 161 HP for Ampharos (Thunder Punch) vs Ampharos (1v0)
142.77 Def + 161 HP for Ampharos (Brutal Swing) vs Ampharos (1v0)

Member IVs (48)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/15/14 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#1	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/15/15 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#2	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/15/13	160.50	142.85	167	#5	-2	-0.9	-1.1	-4.7
14/15/14	159.66	142.85	168	#10	-5	-5.9	-15.6	-6.5
14/15/15	159.66	142.85	168	#11	-5	-5.9	-15.6	-6.5
14/15/13	159.66	142.85	167	#19	-7	-6.7	-16.7	-11.2
13/15/14	158.82	142.85	168	#22	-9	-12.1	-18.1	-9.0
13/15/15	158.82	142.85	168	#23	-9	-12.1	-18.1	-9.0
12/15/14	157.98	142.85	168	#28	-11	-12.9	-13.5	-10.2
12/15/15	157.98	142.85	168	#29	-11	-12.9	-13.5	-10.2
13/15/13	158.82	142.85	167	#36	-11	-13.0	-19.1	-13.7
12/15/13	157.98	142.85	167	#42	-13	-13.7	-14.5	-14.9
11/15/14	157.14	142.85	168	#48	+0	-14.3	-16.5	-16.1
11/15/15	157.14	142.85	168	#49	+0	-14.3	-16.5	-16.1
11/15/13	157.14	142.85	167	#66	+0	-15.2	-17.5	-20.6
10/15/14	156.30	142.85	168	#106	+0	-22.8	-20.8	-19.8
10/15/15	156.30	142.85	168	#107	+0	-22.8	-20.8	-19.8
9/15/14	155.46	142.85	168	#136	+0	-23.6	-21.4	-20.2
9/15/15	155.46	142.85	168	#137	+0	-23.6	-21.4	-20.2
10/15/13	156.30	142.85	167	#142	+0	-23.9	-21.8	-24.2
9/15/13	155.46	142.85	167	#175	+0	-24.7	-22.4	-24.6
8/15/14	154.62	142.85	168	#242	+0	-28.5	-23.8	-22.6
8/15/15	154.62	142.85	168	#243	+0	-28.5	-23.8	-22.6
8/15/13	154.62	142.85	167	#297	+0	-29.7	-24.8	-27.0
7/15/14	153.77	142.85	168	#307	+0	-29.7	-26.3	-23.6
7/15/15	153.77	142.85	168	#308	+0	-29.7	-26.3	-23.6
7/15/13	153.77	142.85	167	#384	+0	-31.0	-27.3	-28.1
6/15/14	152.93	142.85	168	#385	+0	-31.0	-32.1	-25.0
6/15/15	152.93	142.85	168	#386	+0	-31.0	-32.1	-25.0
6/15/13	152.93	142.85	167	#465	+0	-32.3	-33.1	-29.5
5/15/14	152.09	142.85	168	#573	+0	-30.2	-35.4	-31.0
5/15/15	152.09	142.85	168	#574	+0	-30.2	-35.4	-31.0
4/15/14	151.25	142.85	168	#667	+0	-32.5	-36.1	-32.3
4/15/15	151.25	142.85	168	#668	+0	-32.5	-36.1	-32.3
5/15/13	152.09	142.85	167	#695	+0	-31.5	-36.4	-35.5
3/15/14	150.41	142.85	168	#830	+0	-34.4	-37.1	-34.2
3/15/15	150.41	142.85	168	#831	+0	-34.4	-37.1	-34.2
4/15/13	151.25	142.85	167	#840	+0	-34.8	-39.2	-36.9
3/15/13	150.41	142.85	167	#989	+0	-36.7	-40.3	-38.4
2/15/14	149.57	142.85	168	#1082	+0	-37.2	-38.6	-38.1
2/15/15	149.57	142.85	168	#1083	+0	-37.2	-38.6	-38.1
2/15/13	149.57	142.85	167	#1262	+0	-39.6	-41.8	-40.5
1/15/14	148.73	142.85	168	#1300	+0	-40.3	-43.3	-41.4
1/15/15	148.73	142.85	168	#1301	+0	-40.3	-43.3	-41.4
1/15/13	148.73	142.85	167	#1497	+0	-42.7	-46.5	-43.7
0/15/14	147.89	142.85	168	#1499	+0	-43.4	-47.2	-41.8
0/15/15	147.89	142.85	168	#1500	+0	-43.4	-47.2	-41.8
0/15/13	147.89	142.85	167	#1702	+0	-45.8	-50.3	-44.1

Snorlax Slayer · atk≥159.82, hp≥159 (192 IV spreads) (−320 vs Cresselia Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 73 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Bellibolt, Corviknight, +24 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Snorlax (3 scenario flips).

148.22 Atk for Corviknight (Fly) vs Corviknight (0v1)
149.85 Atk for Corviknight (Incinerate) vs Corviknight (0v1)
150.23 Atk for Corviknight (Brave Bird) vs Corviknight (0v1)
149.59 Atk for Melmetal (Incinerate) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
150.56 Atk for Melmetal (Brave Bird) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
152.47 Atk for Melmetal (Fly) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1)
147.93 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Fly) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v0, 2v1)
148.45 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Brave Bird) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v0, 2v1)
159.82 Atk for Snorlax (Incinerate) vs Snorlax (1v1)
159.82 Atk for Snorlax (Fly) vs Snorlax (1v1)
148.92 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 2v2)
149.14 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 2v2)
157.58 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Incinerate) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1)
153.73 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
154.85 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Fly) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
158.56 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Incinerate) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
157.04 Atk for Feraligatr (Brave Bird) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Incinerate) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Fly) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
150.89 Atk for Giratina Altered (Fly) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
150.89 Atk for Giratina Altered (Brave Bird) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
155.20 Atk for Giratina Altered (Incinerate) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
150.46 Atk for Cramorant (Brave Bird) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
151.01 Atk for Cramorant (Fly) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
153.41 Atk for Cramorant (Incinerate) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
148.68 Atk for Guzzlord (Brave Bird) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
149.10 Atk for Guzzlord (Fly) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
150.21 Atk for Guzzlord (Incinerate) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
152.26 Atk for Skeledirge (Fly) vs Skeledirge (0v0)
152.43 Atk for Skeledirge (Brave Bird) vs Skeledirge (0v0)
155.69 Atk for Dusknoir (Brave Bird) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
156.79 Atk for Dusknoir (Incinerate) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
156.79 Atk for Dusknoir (Fly) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
152.82 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Brave Bird) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
154.52 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Fly) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
155.82 Atk for Registeel (Incinerate) vs Registeel (0v1)
155.82 Atk for Registeel (Fly) vs Registeel (0v1)
157.25 Atk for Registeel (Brave Bird) vs Registeel (0v1)
148.58 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
159.39 Atk for Cresselia (Incinerate) vs Cresselia (1v2)
159.39 Atk for Cresselia (Brave Bird) vs Cresselia (1v2)
159.39 Atk for Cresselia (Fly) vs Cresselia (1v2)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Incinerate) vs Alolan Muk (1v1)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Brave Bird) vs Alolan Muk (1v1, 2v2)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Fly) vs Alolan Muk (1v1)
156.38 Atk for Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Talonflame (1v0)
157.96 Atk for Talonflame (Fly) vs Talonflame (1v0)
148.63 Atk for Walrein (Brave Bird) vs Walrein (1v1)
153.91 Atk for Walrein (Fly) vs Walrein (1v1)
148.00 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Fly) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
148.15 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
149.97 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Incinerate) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
148.13 Atk for Runerigus (Brave Bird) vs Runerigus (2v1)
150.44 Atk for Runerigus (Fly) vs Runerigus (2v1)
152.68 Atk for Steelix (Incinerate) vs Steelix (2v0)
152.68 Atk for Steelix (Fly) vs Steelix (2v0)
154.09 Atk for Steelix (Brave Bird) vs Steelix (2v0)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Incinerate) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v2)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 1v2)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Fly) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 1v2)
149.93 Atk for Primarina (Brave Bird) vs Primarina (1v0)
150.49 Atk for Primarina (Fly) vs Primarina (1v0)
152.87 Atk for Primarina (Incinerate) vs Primarina (1v0)
159.05 Atk for Ampharos (Fly) vs Ampharos (2v1)
159.05 Atk for Ampharos (Incinerate) vs Ampharos (2v1)
150.21 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Fly) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
150.44 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
154.63 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Incinerate) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
152.65 Atk for Bellibolt (Fly) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
154.33 Atk for Bellibolt (Brave Bird) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
154.47 Atk for Bellibolt (Incinerate) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
157.74 Atk for Dondozo (Brave Bird) vs Dondozo (2v0)
157.91 Atk for Dondozo (Fly) vs Dondozo (2v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

148.73 Atk flips Forretress (1v1, 1v2) [3840 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Shadow Empoleon (1v0)
vs Mimikyu (0v0)
vs Swampert (1v1)
vs Toucannon (0v0)

Member IVs (192)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/15/14 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#1	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/15/15 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#2	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/14/14	160.50	142.01	168	#3	+0	-1.3	-2.1	-1.9
15/14/15	160.50	142.01	168	#4	+0	-1.3	-2.1	-1.9
15/15/13	160.50	142.85	167	#5	-2	-0.9	-1.1	-4.7
15/14/13	160.50	142.01	167	#6	-3	-2.6	-3.0	-6.6
15/15/12	160.50	142.85	166	#7	-3	-2.0	-2.9	-7.7
15/13/14	160.50	141.17	168	#8	-7	-2.5	-4.6	-11.3
15/13/15	160.50	141.17	168	#9	-7	-2.5	-4.6	-11.3
15/14/12	160.50	142.01	166	#12	-6	-3.4	-4.8	-10.1
15/13/13	160.50	141.17	167	#13	-8	-3.3	-5.5	-13.1
15/15/11	160.50	142.85	165	#14	-6	-2.7	-4.0	-11.9
15/12/14	160.50	140.33	168	#15	-8	-4.3	-5.5	-12.8
15/12/15	160.50	140.33	168	#16	-8	-4.3	-5.5	-12.8
15/11/14	160.50	139.49	168	#20	-8	-10.0	-5.7	-13.6
15/11/15	160.50	139.49	168	#21	-8	-10.0	-5.7	-13.6
15/12/13	160.50	140.33	167	#26	-9	-10.3	-10.0	-13.7
15/14/11	160.50	142.01	165	#27	-9	-9.2	-7.5	-14.2
15/10/14	160.50	138.65	168	#30	-10	-9.6	-7.9	-13.9
15/10/15	160.50	138.65	168	#31	-10	-9.6	-7.9	-13.9
15/15/10	160.50	142.85	164	#34	-7	-12.9	-4.9	-15.6
15/13/12	160.50	141.17	166	#35	-12	-9.2	-9.1	-16.9
15/15/8	160.50	142.85	163	#39	-9	-13.8	-7.6	-15.5
15/15/9	160.50	142.85	163	#40	-9	-13.8	-7.6	-15.5
15/14/10	160.50	142.01	164	#44	-9	-14.3	-8.5	-15.1
15/11/13	160.50	139.49	167	#50	-11	-15.1	-13.2	-17.3
15/15/7	160.50	142.85	162	#54	-13	-15.5	-8.6	-16.2
15/13/11	160.50	141.17	165	#56	-14	-14.3	-11.8	-19.5
15/9/14	160.50	137.81	168	#58	-14	-15.9	-11.3	-21.1
15/9/15	160.50	137.81	168	#59	-14	-15.9	-11.3	-21.1
15/14/8	160.50	142.01	163	#60	-10	-15.1	-9.5	-14.9
15/14/9	160.50	142.01	163	#61	-10	-15.1	-9.5	-14.9
15/12/12	160.50	140.33	166	#64	-14	-15.3	-15.3	-20.4
15/10/13	160.50	138.65	167	#71	-14	-14.7	-15.3	-20.5
15/11/12	160.50	139.49	166	#72	-14	-15.9	-15.7	-21.1
15/8/14	160.50	136.97	168	#76	-15	-16.5	-15.3	-21.5
15/8/15	160.50	136.97	168	#77	-15	-16.5	-15.3	-21.5
15/13/10	160.50	141.17	164	#78	-14	-15.2	-12.7	-20.3
15/12/11	160.50	140.33	165	#80	-15	-16.2	-16.2	-20.1
15/10/12	160.50	138.65	166	#91	-14	-15.8	-16.1	-21.5
15/9/13	160.50	137.81	167	#92	-14	-16.8	-15.9	-22.2
15/11/11	160.50	139.49	165	#93	-15	-16.8	-16.6	-20.8
15/8/13	160.50	136.97	167	#100	-15	-17.9	-16.3	-22.6
15/10/11	160.50	138.65	165	#101	-16	-17.2	-17.0	-21.2
15/12/10	160.50	140.33	164	#102	-16	-18.0	-17.1	-21.0
15/14/7	160.50	142.01	162	#103	-14	-20.4	-10.5	-18.6
15/15/5	160.50	142.85	160	#110	-18	-15.5	-7.2	-22.6
15/9/12	160.50	137.81	166	#111	-15	-18.5	-16.7	-22.9
15/13/8	160.50	141.17	163	#115	-17	-20.1	-12.4	-21.0
15/13/9	160.50	141.17	163	#116	-17	-20.1	-12.4	-21.0
… 142 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Swampert Slayer · atk≥160.27, hp≥159 (192 IV spreads) (−320 vs Cresselia Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 74 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Bellibolt, Corviknight, +25 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Swampert (1 scenario flip).

148.22 Atk for Corviknight (Fly) vs Corviknight (0v1)
149.85 Atk for Corviknight (Incinerate) vs Corviknight (0v1)
150.23 Atk for Corviknight (Brave Bird) vs Corviknight (0v1)
149.59 Atk for Melmetal (Incinerate) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
150.56 Atk for Melmetal (Brave Bird) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
152.47 Atk for Melmetal (Fly) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1)
147.93 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Fly) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v0, 2v1)
148.45 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Brave Bird) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v0, 2v1)
159.82 Atk for Snorlax (Incinerate) vs Snorlax (1v1)
159.82 Atk for Snorlax (Fly) vs Snorlax (1v1)
148.92 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 2v2)
149.14 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 2v2)
157.58 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Incinerate) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1)
153.73 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
154.85 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Fly) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
158.56 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Incinerate) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
157.04 Atk for Feraligatr (Brave Bird) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Incinerate) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Fly) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
150.89 Atk for Giratina Altered (Fly) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
150.89 Atk for Giratina Altered (Brave Bird) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
155.20 Atk for Giratina Altered (Incinerate) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
150.46 Atk for Cramorant (Brave Bird) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
151.01 Atk for Cramorant (Fly) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
153.41 Atk for Cramorant (Incinerate) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
148.68 Atk for Guzzlord (Brave Bird) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
149.10 Atk for Guzzlord (Fly) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
150.21 Atk for Guzzlord (Incinerate) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
152.26 Atk for Skeledirge (Fly) vs Skeledirge (0v0)
152.43 Atk for Skeledirge (Brave Bird) vs Skeledirge (0v0)
155.69 Atk for Dusknoir (Brave Bird) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
156.79 Atk for Dusknoir (Incinerate) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
156.79 Atk for Dusknoir (Fly) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
152.82 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Brave Bird) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
154.52 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Fly) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
155.82 Atk for Registeel (Incinerate) vs Registeel (0v1)
155.82 Atk for Registeel (Fly) vs Registeel (0v1)
157.25 Atk for Registeel (Brave Bird) vs Registeel (0v1)
148.58 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
159.39 Atk for Cresselia (Incinerate) vs Cresselia (1v2)
159.39 Atk for Cresselia (Brave Bird) vs Cresselia (1v2)
159.39 Atk for Cresselia (Fly) vs Cresselia (1v2)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Incinerate) vs Alolan Muk (1v1)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Brave Bird) vs Alolan Muk (1v1, 2v2)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Fly) vs Alolan Muk (1v1, 2v2)
156.38 Atk for Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Talonflame (1v0)
157.96 Atk for Talonflame (Fly) vs Talonflame (1v0)
148.63 Atk for Walrein (Brave Bird) vs Walrein (1v1)
153.91 Atk for Walrein (Fly) vs Walrein (1v1)
148.00 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Fly) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
148.15 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
149.97 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Incinerate) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
148.13 Atk for Runerigus (Brave Bird) vs Runerigus (2v1)
150.44 Atk for Runerigus (Fly) vs Runerigus (2v1)
152.68 Atk for Steelix (Incinerate) vs Steelix (2v0)
152.68 Atk for Steelix (Fly) vs Steelix (2v0)
154.09 Atk for Steelix (Brave Bird) vs Steelix (2v0)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Incinerate) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v2)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 1v2)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Fly) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 1v2)
160.27 Atk for Swampert (Brave Bird) vs Swampert (1v1)
149.93 Atk for Primarina (Brave Bird) vs Primarina (1v0)
150.49 Atk for Primarina (Fly) vs Primarina (1v0)
152.87 Atk for Primarina (Incinerate) vs Primarina (1v0)
159.05 Atk for Ampharos (Fly) vs Ampharos (2v1)
159.05 Atk for Ampharos (Incinerate) vs Ampharos (2v1)
150.21 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Fly) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
150.44 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
154.63 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Incinerate) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
152.65 Atk for Bellibolt (Fly) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
154.33 Atk for Bellibolt (Brave Bird) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
154.47 Atk for Bellibolt (Incinerate) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
157.74 Atk for Dondozo (Brave Bird) vs Dondozo (2v0)
157.91 Atk for Dondozo (Fly) vs Dondozo (2v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

148.73 Atk flips Forretress (1v1, 1v2) [3840 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Shadow Empoleon (1v0)
vs Mimikyu (0v0)
vs Toucannon (0v0)

Member IVs (192)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/15/14 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#1	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/15/15 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#2	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/14/14	160.50	142.01	168	#3	+0	-1.3	-2.1	-1.9
15/14/15	160.50	142.01	168	#4	+0	-1.3	-2.1	-1.9
15/15/13	160.50	142.85	167	#5	-2	-0.9	-1.1	-4.7
15/14/13	160.50	142.01	167	#6	-3	-2.6	-3.0	-6.6
15/15/12	160.50	142.85	166	#7	-3	-2.0	-2.9	-7.7
15/13/14	160.50	141.17	168	#8	-7	-2.5	-4.6	-11.3
15/13/15	160.50	141.17	168	#9	-7	-2.5	-4.6	-11.3
15/14/12	160.50	142.01	166	#12	-6	-3.4	-4.8	-10.1
15/13/13	160.50	141.17	167	#13	-8	-3.3	-5.5	-13.1
15/15/11	160.50	142.85	165	#14	-6	-2.7	-4.0	-11.9
15/12/14	160.50	140.33	168	#15	-8	-4.3	-5.5	-12.8
15/12/15	160.50	140.33	168	#16	-8	-4.3	-5.5	-12.8
15/11/14	160.50	139.49	168	#20	-8	-10.0	-5.7	-13.6
15/11/15	160.50	139.49	168	#21	-8	-10.0	-5.7	-13.6
15/12/13	160.50	140.33	167	#26	-9	-10.3	-10.0	-13.7
15/14/11	160.50	142.01	165	#27	-9	-9.2	-7.5	-14.2
15/10/14	160.50	138.65	168	#30	-10	-9.6	-7.9	-13.9
15/10/15	160.50	138.65	168	#31	-10	-9.6	-7.9	-13.9
15/15/10	160.50	142.85	164	#34	-7	-12.9	-4.9	-15.6
15/13/12	160.50	141.17	166	#35	-12	-9.2	-9.1	-16.9
15/15/8	160.50	142.85	163	#39	-9	-13.8	-7.6	-15.5
15/15/9	160.50	142.85	163	#40	-9	-13.8	-7.6	-15.5
15/14/10	160.50	142.01	164	#44	-9	-14.3	-8.5	-15.1
15/11/13	160.50	139.49	167	#50	-11	-15.1	-13.2	-17.3
15/15/7	160.50	142.85	162	#54	-13	-15.5	-8.6	-16.2
15/13/11	160.50	141.17	165	#56	-14	-14.3	-11.8	-19.5
15/9/14	160.50	137.81	168	#58	-14	-15.9	-11.3	-21.1
15/9/15	160.50	137.81	168	#59	-14	-15.9	-11.3	-21.1
15/14/8	160.50	142.01	163	#60	-10	-15.1	-9.5	-14.9
15/14/9	160.50	142.01	163	#61	-10	-15.1	-9.5	-14.9
15/12/12	160.50	140.33	166	#64	-14	-15.3	-15.3	-20.4
15/10/13	160.50	138.65	167	#71	-14	-14.7	-15.3	-20.5
15/11/12	160.50	139.49	166	#72	-14	-15.9	-15.7	-21.1
15/8/14	160.50	136.97	168	#76	-15	-16.5	-15.3	-21.5
15/8/15	160.50	136.97	168	#77	-15	-16.5	-15.3	-21.5
15/13/10	160.50	141.17	164	#78	-14	-15.2	-12.7	-20.3
15/12/11	160.50	140.33	165	#80	-15	-16.2	-16.2	-20.1
15/10/12	160.50	138.65	166	#91	-14	-15.8	-16.1	-21.5
15/9/13	160.50	137.81	167	#92	-14	-16.8	-15.9	-22.2
15/11/11	160.50	139.49	165	#93	-15	-16.8	-16.6	-20.8
15/8/13	160.50	136.97	167	#100	-15	-17.9	-16.3	-22.6
15/10/11	160.50	138.65	165	#101	-16	-17.2	-17.0	-21.2
15/12/10	160.50	140.33	164	#102	-16	-18.0	-17.1	-21.0
15/14/7	160.50	142.01	162	#103	-14	-20.4	-10.5	-18.6
15/15/5	160.50	142.85	160	#110	-18	-15.5	-7.2	-22.6
15/9/12	160.50	137.81	166	#111	-15	-18.5	-16.7	-22.9
15/13/8	160.50	141.17	163	#115	-17	-20.1	-12.4	-21.0
15/13/9	160.50	141.17	163	#116	-17	-20.1	-12.4	-21.0
… 142 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Cresselia Atk · atk≥159.39 (512 IV spreads)

Clears 71 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Bellibolt, Corviknight, +23 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Cresselia (3 scenario flips).

148.22 Atk for Corviknight (Fly) vs Corviknight (0v1)
149.85 Atk for Corviknight (Incinerate) vs Corviknight (0v1)
150.23 Atk for Corviknight (Brave Bird) vs Corviknight (0v1)
149.59 Atk for Melmetal (Incinerate) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
150.56 Atk for Melmetal (Brave Bird) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
152.47 Atk for Melmetal (Fly) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1)
147.93 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Fly) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v0, 2v1)
148.45 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Brave Bird) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v0, 2v1)
148.92 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 2v2)
149.14 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 2v2)
157.58 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Incinerate) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1)
153.73 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
154.85 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Fly) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
158.56 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Incinerate) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
157.04 Atk for Feraligatr (Brave Bird) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Incinerate) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Fly) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
150.89 Atk for Giratina Altered (Fly) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
150.89 Atk for Giratina Altered (Brave Bird) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
155.20 Atk for Giratina Altered (Incinerate) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
150.46 Atk for Cramorant (Brave Bird) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
151.01 Atk for Cramorant (Fly) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
153.41 Atk for Cramorant (Incinerate) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
148.68 Atk for Guzzlord (Brave Bird) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
149.10 Atk for Guzzlord (Fly) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
150.21 Atk for Guzzlord (Incinerate) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
152.26 Atk for Skeledirge (Fly) vs Skeledirge (0v0)
152.43 Atk for Skeledirge (Brave Bird) vs Skeledirge (0v0)
155.69 Atk for Dusknoir (Brave Bird) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
156.79 Atk for Dusknoir (Incinerate) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
156.79 Atk for Dusknoir (Fly) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
152.82 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Brave Bird) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
154.52 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Fly) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
155.82 Atk for Registeel (Incinerate) vs Registeel (0v1)
155.82 Atk for Registeel (Fly) vs Registeel (0v1)
157.25 Atk for Registeel (Brave Bird) vs Registeel (0v1)
148.58 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
159.39 Atk for Cresselia (Incinerate) vs Cresselia (1v2)
159.39 Atk for Cresselia (Brave Bird) vs Cresselia (1v2)
159.39 Atk for Cresselia (Fly) vs Cresselia (1v2)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Incinerate) vs Alolan Muk (1v1)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Brave Bird) vs Alolan Muk (1v1)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Fly) vs Alolan Muk (1v1)
156.38 Atk for Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Talonflame (1v0)
157.96 Atk for Talonflame (Fly) vs Talonflame (1v0)
148.63 Atk for Walrein (Brave Bird) vs Walrein (1v1)
153.91 Atk for Walrein (Fly) vs Walrein (1v1)
148.00 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Fly) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
148.15 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
149.97 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Incinerate) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
148.13 Atk for Runerigus (Brave Bird) vs Runerigus (2v1)
150.44 Atk for Runerigus (Fly) vs Runerigus (2v1)
152.68 Atk for Steelix (Incinerate) vs Steelix (2v0)
152.68 Atk for Steelix (Fly) vs Steelix (2v0)
154.09 Atk for Steelix (Brave Bird) vs Steelix (2v0)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Incinerate) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v2)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 1v2)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Fly) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 1v2)
149.93 Atk for Primarina (Brave Bird) vs Primarina (1v0)
150.49 Atk for Primarina (Fly) vs Primarina (1v0)
152.87 Atk for Primarina (Incinerate) vs Primarina (1v0)
159.05 Atk for Ampharos (Fly) vs Ampharos (2v1)
159.05 Atk for Ampharos (Incinerate) vs Ampharos (2v1)
150.21 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Fly) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
150.44 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
154.63 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Incinerate) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
152.65 Atk for Bellibolt (Fly) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
154.33 Atk for Bellibolt (Brave Bird) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
154.47 Atk for Bellibolt (Incinerate) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
157.74 Atk for Dondozo (Brave Bird) vs Dondozo (2v0)
157.91 Atk for Dondozo (Fly) vs Dondozo (2v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

148.73 Atk flips Forretress (1v1, 1v2) [3840 IVs]

Member IVs (512)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/15/14 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#1	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/15/15 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#2	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/14/14	160.50	142.01	168	#3	+0	-1.3	-2.1	-1.9
15/14/15	160.50	142.01	168	#4	+0	-1.3	-2.1	-1.9
15/15/13	160.50	142.85	167	#5	-2	-0.9	-1.1	-4.7
15/14/13	160.50	142.01	167	#6	-3	-2.6	-3.0	-6.6
15/15/12	160.50	142.85	166	#7	-3	-2.0	-2.9	-7.7
15/13/14	160.50	141.17	168	#8	-7	-2.5	-4.6	-11.3
15/13/15	160.50	141.17	168	#9	-7	-2.5	-4.6	-11.3
14/15/14	159.66	142.85	168	#10	-5	-5.9	-15.6	-6.5
14/15/15	159.66	142.85	168	#11	-5	-5.9	-15.6	-6.5
15/14/12	160.50	142.01	166	#12	-6	-3.4	-4.8	-10.1
15/13/13	160.50	141.17	167	#13	-8	-3.3	-5.5	-13.1
15/15/11	160.50	142.85	165	#14	-6	-2.7	-4.0	-11.9
15/12/14	160.50	140.33	168	#15	-8	-4.3	-5.5	-12.8
15/12/15	160.50	140.33	168	#16	-8	-4.3	-5.5	-12.8
14/14/14	159.66	142.01	168	#17	-5	-7.4	-17.7	-8.7
14/14/15	159.66	142.01	168	#18	-5	-7.4	-17.7	-8.7
14/15/13	159.66	142.85	167	#19	-7	-6.7	-16.7	-11.2
15/11/14	160.50	139.49	168	#20	-8	-10.0	-5.7	-13.6
15/11/15	160.50	139.49	168	#21	-8	-10.0	-5.7	-13.6
14/14/13	159.66	142.01	167	#24	-9	-8.6	-18.6	-13.4
14/15/12	159.66	142.85	166	#25	-9	-7.9	-18.5	-14.6
15/12/13	160.50	140.33	167	#26	-9	-10.3	-10.0	-13.7
15/14/11	160.50	142.01	165	#27	-9	-9.2	-7.5	-14.2
15/10/14	160.50	138.65	168	#30	-10	-9.6	-7.9	-13.9
15/10/15	160.50	138.65	168	#31	-10	-9.6	-7.9	-13.9
14/13/14	159.66	141.17	168	#32	-11	-8.5	-20.2	-18.0
14/13/15	159.66	141.17	168	#33	-11	-8.5	-20.2	-18.0
15/15/10	160.50	142.85	164	#34	-7	-12.9	-4.9	-15.6
15/13/12	160.50	141.17	166	#35	-12	-9.2	-9.1	-16.9
15/15/8	160.50	142.85	163	#39	-9	-13.8	-7.6	-15.5
15/15/9	160.50	142.85	163	#40	-9	-13.8	-7.6	-15.5
14/14/12	159.66	142.01	166	#41	-12	-9.4	-20.4	-17.0
14/13/13	159.66	141.17	167	#43	-13	-9.4	-21.0	-19.8
15/14/10	160.50	142.01	164	#44	-9	-14.3	-8.5	-15.1
14/15/11	159.66	142.85	165	#47	-12	-8.6	-19.4	-18.7
15/11/13	160.50	139.49	167	#50	-11	-15.1	-13.2	-17.3
14/12/14	159.66	140.33	168	#51	-13	-10.3	-21.1	-19.6
14/12/15	159.66	140.33	168	#52	-13	-10.3	-21.1	-19.6
15/15/7	160.50	142.85	162	#54	-13	-15.5	-8.6	-16.2
15/13/11	160.50	141.17	165	#56	-14	-14.3	-11.8	-19.5
15/9/14	160.50	137.81	168	#58	-14	-15.9	-11.3	-21.1
15/9/15	160.50	137.81	168	#59	-14	-15.9	-11.3	-21.1
15/14/8	160.50	142.01	163	#60	-10	-15.1	-9.5	-14.9
15/14/9	160.50	142.01	163	#61	-10	-15.1	-9.5	-14.9
15/12/12	160.50	140.33	166	#64	-14	-15.3	-15.3	-20.4
14/11/14	159.66	139.49	168	#67	-13	-16.1	-21.3	-20.4
14/11/15	159.66	139.49	168	#68	-13	-16.1	-21.3	-20.4
15/10/13	160.50	138.65	167	#71	-14	-14.7	-15.3	-20.5
… 462 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Ampharos Atk · atk≥159.05 (512 IV spreads)

Clears 67 anchors across 8 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Bellibolt, Corviknight, +22 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Ampharos (2 scenario flips).

148.22 Atk for Corviknight (Fly) vs Corviknight (0v1)
149.85 Atk for Corviknight (Incinerate) vs Corviknight (0v1)
150.23 Atk for Corviknight (Brave Bird) vs Corviknight (0v1)
149.59 Atk for Melmetal (Incinerate) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
150.56 Atk for Melmetal (Brave Bird) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1, 1v2)
152.47 Atk for Melmetal (Fly) vs Melmetal (0v0, 0v1)
147.93 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Fly) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v0, 2v1)
148.45 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Brave Bird) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (1v0, 2v1)
148.92 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Brave Bird) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 2v2)
149.14 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Fly) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1, 2v2)
157.58 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Incinerate) vs Galarian Moltres (1v1)
153.73 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
154.85 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Fly) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
158.56 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Incinerate) vs Shadow Feraligatr (1v0)
157.04 Atk for Feraligatr (Brave Bird) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Incinerate) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
158.56 Atk for Feraligatr (Fly) vs Feraligatr (2v1)
150.89 Atk for Giratina Altered (Fly) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
150.89 Atk for Giratina Altered (Brave Bird) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
155.20 Atk for Giratina Altered (Incinerate) vs Giratina (Altered) (2v0)
150.46 Atk for Cramorant (Brave Bird) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
151.01 Atk for Cramorant (Fly) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
153.41 Atk for Cramorant (Incinerate) vs Cramorant (2v1 with bait)
148.68 Atk for Guzzlord (Brave Bird) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
149.10 Atk for Guzzlord (Fly) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
150.21 Atk for Guzzlord (Incinerate) vs Guzzlord (2v1)
152.26 Atk for Skeledirge (Fly) vs Skeledirge (0v0)
152.43 Atk for Skeledirge (Brave Bird) vs Skeledirge (0v0)
155.69 Atk for Dusknoir (Brave Bird) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
156.79 Atk for Dusknoir (Incinerate) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
156.79 Atk for Dusknoir (Fly) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
152.82 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Brave Bird) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
154.52 Atk for Alolan Ninetales (Fly) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
155.82 Atk for Registeel (Incinerate) vs Registeel (0v1)
155.82 Atk for Registeel (Fly) vs Registeel (0v1)
157.25 Atk for Registeel (Brave Bird) vs Registeel (0v1)
148.58 Atk for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v0)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Incinerate) vs Alolan Muk (1v1)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Brave Bird) vs Alolan Muk (1v1)
148.29 Atk for Alolan Muk (Fly) vs Alolan Muk (1v1)
156.38 Atk for Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Talonflame (1v0)
157.96 Atk for Talonflame (Fly) vs Talonflame (1v0)
148.63 Atk for Walrein (Brave Bird) vs Walrein (1v1)
153.91 Atk for Walrein (Fly) vs Walrein (1v1)
148.00 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Fly) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
148.15 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
149.97 Atk for Shadow Walrein (Incinerate) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0, 1v0)
148.13 Atk for Runerigus (Brave Bird) vs Runerigus (2v1)
150.44 Atk for Runerigus (Fly) vs Runerigus (2v1)
152.68 Atk for Steelix (Incinerate) vs Steelix (2v0)
152.68 Atk for Steelix (Fly) vs Steelix (2v0)
154.09 Atk for Steelix (Brave Bird) vs Steelix (2v0)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Incinerate) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v2)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 1v2)
150.87 Atk for Shadow Cresselia (Fly) vs Shadow Cresselia (1v1, 1v2)
149.93 Atk for Primarina (Brave Bird) vs Primarina (1v0)
150.49 Atk for Primarina (Fly) vs Primarina (1v0)
152.87 Atk for Primarina (Incinerate) vs Primarina (1v0)
159.05 Atk for Ampharos (Fly) vs Ampharos (2v1)
150.21 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Fly) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
150.44 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Brave Bird) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
154.63 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Incinerate) vs Shadow Ampharos (1v0)
152.65 Atk for Bellibolt (Fly) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
154.33 Atk for Bellibolt (Brave Bird) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
154.47 Atk for Bellibolt (Incinerate) vs Bellibolt (2v1)
157.74 Atk for Dondozo (Brave Bird) vs Dondozo (2v0)
157.91 Atk for Dondozo (Fly) vs Dondozo (2v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

148.73 Atk flips Cresselia (0v0, 0v1) [3840 IVs]
148.73 Atk flips Forretress (1v1, 1v2) [3840 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Cresselia (1v2)

Member IVs (512)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/15/14 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#1	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/15/15 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#2	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/14/14	160.50	142.01	168	#3	+0	-1.3	-2.1	-1.9
15/14/15	160.50	142.01	168	#4	+0	-1.3	-2.1	-1.9
15/15/13	160.50	142.85	167	#5	-2	-0.9	-1.1	-4.7
15/14/13	160.50	142.01	167	#6	-3	-2.6	-3.0	-6.6
15/15/12	160.50	142.85	166	#7	-3	-2.0	-2.9	-7.7
15/13/14	160.50	141.17	168	#8	-7	-2.5	-4.6	-11.3
15/13/15	160.50	141.17	168	#9	-7	-2.5	-4.6	-11.3
14/15/14	159.66	142.85	168	#10	-5	-5.9	-15.6	-6.5
14/15/15	159.66	142.85	168	#11	-5	-5.9	-15.6	-6.5
15/14/12	160.50	142.01	166	#12	-6	-3.4	-4.8	-10.1
15/13/13	160.50	141.17	167	#13	-8	-3.3	-5.5	-13.1
15/15/11	160.50	142.85	165	#14	-6	-2.7	-4.0	-11.9
15/12/14	160.50	140.33	168	#15	-8	-4.3	-5.5	-12.8
15/12/15	160.50	140.33	168	#16	-8	-4.3	-5.5	-12.8
14/14/14	159.66	142.01	168	#17	-5	-7.4	-17.7	-8.7
14/14/15	159.66	142.01	168	#18	-5	-7.4	-17.7	-8.7
14/15/13	159.66	142.85	167	#19	-7	-6.7	-16.7	-11.2
15/11/14	160.50	139.49	168	#20	-8	-10.0	-5.7	-13.6
15/11/15	160.50	139.49	168	#21	-8	-10.0	-5.7	-13.6
14/14/13	159.66	142.01	167	#24	-9	-8.6	-18.6	-13.4
14/15/12	159.66	142.85	166	#25	-9	-7.9	-18.5	-14.6
15/12/13	160.50	140.33	167	#26	-9	-10.3	-10.0	-13.7
15/14/11	160.50	142.01	165	#27	-9	-9.2	-7.5	-14.2
15/10/14	160.50	138.65	168	#30	-10	-9.6	-7.9	-13.9
15/10/15	160.50	138.65	168	#31	-10	-9.6	-7.9	-13.9
14/13/14	159.66	141.17	168	#32	-11	-8.5	-20.2	-18.0
14/13/15	159.66	141.17	168	#33	-11	-8.5	-20.2	-18.0
15/15/10	160.50	142.85	164	#34	-7	-12.9	-4.9	-15.6
15/13/12	160.50	141.17	166	#35	-12	-9.2	-9.1	-16.9
15/15/8	160.50	142.85	163	#39	-9	-13.8	-7.6	-15.5
15/15/9	160.50	142.85	163	#40	-9	-13.8	-7.6	-15.5
14/14/12	159.66	142.01	166	#41	-12	-9.4	-20.4	-17.0
14/13/13	159.66	141.17	167	#43	-13	-9.4	-21.0	-19.8
15/14/10	160.50	142.01	164	#44	-9	-14.3	-8.5	-15.1
14/15/11	159.66	142.85	165	#47	-12	-8.6	-19.4	-18.7
15/11/13	160.50	139.49	167	#50	-11	-15.1	-13.2	-17.3
14/12/14	159.66	140.33	168	#51	-13	-10.3	-21.1	-19.6
14/12/15	159.66	140.33	168	#52	-13	-10.3	-21.1	-19.6
15/15/7	160.50	142.85	162	#54	-13	-15.5	-8.6	-16.2
15/13/11	160.50	141.17	165	#56	-14	-14.3	-11.8	-19.5
15/9/14	160.50	137.81	168	#58	-14	-15.9	-11.3	-21.1
15/9/15	160.50	137.81	168	#59	-14	-15.9	-11.3	-21.1
15/14/8	160.50	142.01	163	#60	-10	-15.1	-9.5	-14.9
15/14/9	160.50	142.01	163	#61	-10	-15.1	-9.5	-14.9
15/12/12	160.50	140.33	166	#64	-14	-15.3	-15.3	-20.4
14/11/14	159.66	139.49	168	#67	-13	-16.1	-21.3	-20.4
14/11/15	159.66	139.49	168	#68	-13	-16.1	-21.3	-20.4
15/10/13	160.50	138.65	167	#71	-14	-14.7	-15.3	-20.5
… 462 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

General · atk≥147.93, def≥130.33 (3600 IV spreads)

Clears 2 anchors across 2 shield scenarios, covering Shadow Malamar, Zygarde (Complete Forme). Floor across 29 atk breakpoint opponents + 20 bulkpoint opponents. Clears the easiest anchor for every opponent.

147.93 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Fly) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v1)
130.33 Def + 163 HP for Shadow Malamar bulk (Foul Play) vs Shadow Malamar (1v1)

Member IVs (3600)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/15/14 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#1	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/15/15 👑	160.50	142.85	168	#2	+0	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
15/14/14	160.50	142.01	168	#3	+0	-1.3	-2.1	-1.9
15/14/15	160.50	142.01	168	#4	+0	-1.3	-2.1	-1.9
15/15/13	160.50	142.85	167	#5	-2	-0.9	-1.1	-4.7
15/14/13	160.50	142.01	167	#6	-3	-2.6	-3.0	-6.6
15/15/12	160.50	142.85	166	#7	-3	-2.0	-2.9	-7.7
15/13/14	160.50	141.17	168	#8	-7	-2.5	-4.6	-11.3
15/13/15	160.50	141.17	168	#9	-7	-2.5	-4.6	-11.3
14/15/14	159.66	142.85	168	#10	-5	-5.9	-15.6	-6.5
14/15/15	159.66	142.85	168	#11	-5	-5.9	-15.6	-6.5
15/14/12	160.50	142.01	166	#12	-6	-3.4	-4.8	-10.1
15/13/13	160.50	141.17	167	#13	-8	-3.3	-5.5	-13.1
15/15/11	160.50	142.85	165	#14	-6	-2.7	-4.0	-11.9
15/12/14	160.50	140.33	168	#15	-8	-4.3	-5.5	-12.8
15/12/15	160.50	140.33	168	#16	-8	-4.3	-5.5	-12.8
14/14/14	159.66	142.01	168	#17	-5	-7.4	-17.7	-8.7
14/14/15	159.66	142.01	168	#18	-5	-7.4	-17.7	-8.7
14/15/13	159.66	142.85	167	#19	-7	-6.7	-16.7	-11.2
15/11/14	160.50	139.49	168	#20	-8	-10.0	-5.7	-13.6
15/11/15	160.50	139.49	168	#21	-8	-10.0	-5.7	-13.6
13/15/14	158.82	142.85	168	#22	-9	-12.1	-18.1	-9.0
13/15/15	158.82	142.85	168	#23	-9	-12.1	-18.1	-9.0
14/14/13	159.66	142.01	167	#24	-9	-8.6	-18.6	-13.4
14/15/12	159.66	142.85	166	#25	-9	-7.9	-18.5	-14.6
15/12/13	160.50	140.33	167	#26	-9	-10.3	-10.0	-13.7
15/14/11	160.50	142.01	165	#27	-9	-9.2	-7.5	-14.2
12/15/14	157.98	142.85	168	#28	-11	-12.9	-13.5	-10.2
12/15/15	157.98	142.85	168	#29	-11	-12.9	-13.5	-10.2
15/10/14	160.50	138.65	168	#30	-10	-9.6	-7.9	-13.9
15/10/15	160.50	138.65	168	#31	-10	-9.6	-7.9	-13.9
14/13/14	159.66	141.17	168	#32	-11	-8.5	-20.2	-18.0
14/13/15	159.66	141.17	168	#33	-11	-8.5	-20.2	-18.0
15/15/10	160.50	142.85	164	#34	-7	-12.9	-4.9	-15.6
15/13/12	160.50	141.17	166	#35	-12	-9.2	-9.1	-16.9
13/15/13	158.82	142.85	167	#36	-11	-13.0	-19.1	-13.7
13/14/14	158.82	142.01	168	#37	-10	-13.6	-20.2	-11.2
13/14/15	158.82	142.01	168	#38	-10	-13.6	-20.2	-11.2
15/15/8	160.50	142.85	163	#39	-9	-13.8	-7.6	-15.5
15/15/9	160.50	142.85	163	#40	-9	-13.8	-7.6	-15.5
14/14/12	159.66	142.01	166	#41	-12	-9.4	-20.4	-17.0
12/15/13	157.98	142.85	167	#42	-13	-13.7	-14.5	-14.9
14/13/13	159.66	141.17	167	#43	-13	-9.4	-21.0	-19.8
15/14/10	160.50	142.01	164	#44	-9	-14.3	-8.5	-15.1
12/14/14	157.98	142.01	168	#45	-12	-14.3	-15.6	-12.4
12/14/15	157.98	142.01	168	#46	-12	-14.3	-15.6	-12.4
14/15/11	159.66	142.85	165	#47	-12	-8.6	-19.4	-18.7
11/15/14	157.14	142.85	168	#48	+0	-14.3	-16.5	-16.1
11/15/15	157.14	142.85	168	#49	+0	-14.3	-16.5	-16.1
15/11/13	160.50	139.49	167	#50	-11	-15.1	-13.2	-17.3
… 3550 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Per-matchup IV finder (119 specific matchups - e.g. "which IV beats a given opponent in a given shield?")

Collapsed by default. This is a per-(opponent, shield) lookup: each card is one matchup and the exact IV spreads that win it. For "what do I need vs threat X" use Threats where your build choice matters above, or paste your collection into the scatter. Composite cards (slayer ∩ tier) surface IVs that satisfy a slayer anchor and a stat-cutoff tier; pure slayer-archetype cards live in the Slayer Builds block below, pure tier cards in the Threshold Tiers above.

Show only notable categories (≤ 5% of cohort or ≤ 5 members). Uncheck to see every non-trivial intersection.

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Fortified Ampharos (3 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Fortified Ampharos · def≥142.85, hp≥167

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +3.9, spread 0.7)

15/15/13 no atk weight - atk 160.50, def 142.85, hp 167, SP #7

One of 3 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Ampharos threshold (def≥142.85, hp≥167). Carries top Anchors-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Fortified Ampharos cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/15/14 👑 rank-1 - atk 160.50, def 142.85, hp 168, SP #2

15/15/15 👑 rank-1 - atk 160.50, def 142.85, hp 168, SP #1

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Fortified Ampharos (3 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Fortified Ampharos · def≥142.85, hp≥167

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +3.9, spread 0.7)

15/15/13 no atk weight - atk 160.50, def 142.85, hp 167, SP #7

One of 3 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Ampharos threshold (def≥142.85, hp≥167). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Fortified Ampharos cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/15/14 👑 rank-1 - atk 160.50, def 142.85, hp 168, SP #2

15/15/15 👑 rank-1 - atk 160.50, def 142.85, hp 168, SP #1

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Ampharos Atk (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Ampharos Atk · atk≥159.05

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +3.0, spread 0.8)

15/10/14 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 138.65, hp 168, SP #75

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/10/15 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 138.65, hp 168, SP #74

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/11/14 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 139.49, hp 168, SP #47

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/11/15 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 139.49, hp 168, SP #46

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/12/13 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 140.33, hp 167, SP #45

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/12/14 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 140.33, hp 168, SP #27

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/12/15 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 140.33, hp 168, SP #26

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/13/13 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 141.17, hp 167, SP #28

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/13/14 no atk weight - atk 160.50, def 141.17, hp 168, SP #14

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/13/15 no atk weight - atk 160.50, def 141.17, hp 168, SP #13

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/14/11 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 142.01, hp 165, SP #49

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/14/12 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 142.01, hp 166, SP #29

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/14/13 no atk weight - atk 160.50, def 142.01, hp 167, SP #15

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/14/14 no atk weight - atk 160.50, def 142.01, hp 168, SP #6

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/14/15 no atk weight - atk 160.50, def 142.01, hp 168, SP #5

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/15/11 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 142.85, hp 165, SP #30

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/15/12 no atk weight - atk 160.50, def 142.85, hp 166, SP #16

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/15/13 no atk weight - atk 160.50, def 142.85, hp 167, SP #7

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/15/14 👑 rank-1 - atk 160.50, def 142.85, hp 168, SP #2

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/15/15 👑 rank-1 - atk 160.50, def 142.85, hp 168, SP #1

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Ampharos Atk threshold (atk≥159.05). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Ampharos Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Cresselia Atk (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Cresselia Atk · atk≥159.392

Envelope: Rides top of anchor band (avg +3.0, spread 0.8)

15/10/14 atk tilt - atk 160.50, def 138.65, hp 168, SP #75

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Cresselia Atk threshold (atk≥159.392). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (115/115) AND clears the Cresselia Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.