Tinkaton Ultra League IV Dive

Opponent list (63 mons)

Tinkaton, Corviknight, Snorlax (Shadow), Corviknight (Shadow), Melmetal, Virizion, Zygarde (Complete Forme), Empoleon, Empoleon (Shadow), Mimikyu, Snorlax, Florges, Moltres (Galarian), Feraligatr (Shadow), Feraligatr, Jellicent, Giratina (Altered), Cramorant, Guzzlord, Skeledirge, Rillaboom, Lapras, Lapras (Shadow), Dusknoir, Ninetales (Alolan), Dondozo, Dusknoir (Shadow), Registeel, Blastoise, Ninetales (Alolan) (Shadow), Forretress, Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), Regidrago, Ninetales, Cresselia, Muk (Alolan), Clefable, Talonflame, Forretress (Shadow), Walrein, Walrein (Shadow), Deoxys (Defense), Runerigus, Steelix, Seaking, Cresselia (Shadow), Steelix (Shadow), Swampert, Toucannon, Milotic (Shadow), Primarina, Ampharos, Cradily (Shadow), Malamar (Shadow), Ampharos (Shadow), Talonflame (Shadow), Bellibolt, Seismitoad, Annihilape, Miltank, Forretress (Bug Bite), Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)

Which one to build? [all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (139 spreads, Atk >= 140.00 and Def >= 171.70 and HP >= 175) guarantees 43 of the 61 decision matchups; Build 2 (94 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 36 others; Build 1 wide (326 spreads) keeps 37 of Build 1's 43 guaranteed matchups.

Build criteria: the same control as the one in the scatter strip below; either handle moves both

Tinkaton running Fairy Wind / Bulldoze, Gigaton Hammer.

[all shields, equal] Any of them: no single stat threshold decides a matchup here. Which matchups you win still moves: Build 1 (139 spreads, Atk >= 140.00 and Def >= 171.70 and HP >= 175) guarantees 43 of the 61 decision matchups; Build 2 (94 spreads, disjoint from it) guarantees 36 others; Build 1 wide (326 spreads) keeps 37 of Build 1's 43 guaranteed matchups.

No single-stat line on this moveset.

Build

Rule

Spreads

Guarantees

Rarest win

Gives up

Best member / SP1

Build 1 (primary)

Atk >= 140.00 and Def >= 171.70 and HP >= 175

139

43 of 61, 0 of them material; 36 hold under every opponent-IV mode

0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (outside 12%)

1: 1v0 Corviknight (Shadow)

13/15/14 (315 of 567 matchups); SP1 in

What Build 1 guarantees (43 of 61), its 139 members

The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others.

0v0 (15)
- 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 12%
- 0v0 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 18%
- 0v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 22%
- 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 22%
- 0v0 Lapras (Shadow) (rank 23) -- outside 44%
- 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 53%
- 0v0 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 54%
- 0v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 56%
- 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 61%
- 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 76%
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 78%
- 0v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 80%
- 0v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 87%
- 0v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 96%
0v1 (3)
- 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 48%
- 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 83%
- 0v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 87%
0v2 (2)
- 0v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 59%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 74%
1v0 (3)
- 1v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 53%
- 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 60%
- 1v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 81%
1v1 (3)
- 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 61%
- 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 79%
- 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 94%
1v2 (3)
- 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 61%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 86%
- 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 90%
2v0 (1)
- 2v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 68%
2v1 (6)
- 2v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 33%
- 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 55%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 61%
- 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 73%
- 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 89%
- 2v1 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 97%
2v2 (7)
- 2v2 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 22%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 22%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 37%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 43%
- 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 61%
- 2v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 61%
- 2v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 97%

Members (139), highest stat product first

Build 1 wide

~ Atk >= 140.00 + Def/HP staircase (9 steps)

326

37 of 61, 0 of them material; 29 hold under every opponent-IV mode

7: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v0 Virizion, +5 more

What the wider rule keeps and gives up

HP	Defense floor at that HP and above
170	177
171	174
172	173
173	170
174	170
175	170
176	170
177	170
178	170

The rule covers 98% of the same spreads (6 extra, 0 missed); the member list is the region.

The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 139 spreads in 326 of its own, and keeps 37 of Build 1's 43 guaranteed matchups (none of them material).

The 6 it gives up out here: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 15%), 0v0 Runerigus (grid 21%) and 0v0 Virizion (grid 24%), and 3 more.

Build 2 (fork)

no two- or three-stat rule fits; 94 spreads by list

36 of 61, 0 of them material; 28 hold under every opponent-IV mode

2v2 Registeel (outside 23%)

8: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v0 Virizion, +6 more

15/13/6 (302 of 567 matchups)

What Build 2 guarantees (36 of 61), its 94 members

all inside attack IV 12-15, defense IV 9-15, HP IV 1-7; that box also holds 102 spreads that are not members

No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build.

0v0 (9)
- 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 53%
- 0v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 57%
- 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 62%
- 0v0 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 76%
- 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 79%
- 0v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 80%
- 0v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7) -- outside 87%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v0 Lapras (rank 22) -- outside 87%
- 0v0 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 96%
0v1 (3)
- 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 49%
- 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 84%
- 0v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 87%
0v2 (2)
- 0v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 59%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 74%
1v0 (4)
- 1v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 42%
- 1v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 54%
- 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 60%
- 1v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 81%
1v1 (3)
- 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 62%
- 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 79%
- 1v1 Dusknoir (Shadow) (rank 27) -- outside 94%
1v2 (3)
- 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 62%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 86%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 90%
2v0 (1)
- 2v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 68%
2v1 (5)
- 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 55%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 62%
- 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 73%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 90%
- 2v1 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 97%
2v2 (6)
- 2v2 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 23%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 23%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes
- 2v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 44%
- 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 62%
- 2v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 62%
- 2v2 Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) (rank 39) -- outside 97%

Members (94), highest stat product first

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 140.00 and Def >= 171.70 and HP >= 175	139	25 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 43 of 61 overall, 0 of them material; 36 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (outside 12%)	nothing the other builds guarantee	13/15/14 (106 of 189 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 1 guarantees (25 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 43 of 61 overall), its 139 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (15) 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 12% 0v0 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 18% 0v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 22% 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 22% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 48% 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 83% 0v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13) -- outside 87% 0v2 (2) 0v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 59%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 74% 1v0 (3) 1v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 53% 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 60% 1v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 81% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 61% 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 79% 1v2 (3) 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 61%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 86% 1v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 90% 2v0 (1) 2v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 68% 2v1 (6) 2v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 33% 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 55%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 61% 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 73% 2v2 (7) 2v2 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 22%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 22%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 37%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 43% Members (139), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 134.00 and Def >= 171.70 and HP >= 175	384	21 of 36 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 35 of 61 overall, 0 of them material; 23 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	8: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v0 Seaking, +6 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 139 spreads in 384 of its own, and keeps 21 of Build 1's 25 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (35 of its 43 overall, none of them material). The 8 it gives up out here: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 15%), 0v0 Seaking (grid 25%) and 2v2 Registeel (grid 25%), and 5 more.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 1v1 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 1427 spreads by list	1427	3 of 5 in 1v1 shields; 18 of 61 overall, 0 of them material; 15 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (outside 30%)	nothing the other builds guarantee	14/8/14 (32 of 63 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 1 guarantees (3 of 5 in 1v1 shields; 18 of 61 overall), its 1427 members all inside attack IV 0-15, defense IV 7-15, HP IV 1-15; that box also holds 733 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (7) 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 30% 0v0 Milotic (Shadow) (rank 50) -- outside 32%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 35% 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 42% 0v1 (1) 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 75% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 42% 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 69% 1v2 (1) 1v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 79%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (3) 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 42% 2v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 84% 2v2 (3) 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 42% 2v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 42% Members (1427), highest stat product first

Rates: outside N% is the share of the spreads NOT in that build that win the same matchup anyway; grid N% (the Notable spreads list and the cards at the top of the page) is the share of all the spreads on the grid. Weight follows the rate: bold = fewer than half of them win it; bold and underlined = fewer than a quarter; bold, underlined and italic = fewer than a tenth; dim = more than nine in ten win it anyway.

Each build's guarantee list is sorted by outside rate: how often the spreads NOT in that build win the same matchup anyway. The lower the rate, the rarer the guarantee.

Against the 31 spreads the mirror-slayer protocol converges on for Tinkaton (bulk-first here), attack of 142.00 and up wins charge-move priority against 16 of them, and 142.42 and up against 30. Inside a build, take the highest attack you have: Build 1 clears the first cut with 48 of 139 and the second with 20; Build 2 clears the first cut with 50 of 94 and the second with 25.

Is mine in one of these?

Paste your Poke Genie CSV, or add one spread by hand, in Check my collection below; the answer comes back here, grouped by build, and your collection stays in your browser.

Shield scenario:

Y: Color:

Stat-product rank against matchups won with PvPoke-default opponent IVs at the league cap over the whole opponent pool and, with Shield scenario on all, every baked shield state -- the view the single-stat line in the expander below was derived on. The Shield scenario selector on this row is the section's own; the scatter's dropdowns and the opponent filter do not drive this panel.

SP1 13/15/15, 13/15/14

Notable spreads

Every single spread this page names, on one list: the spread that wins the most matchups, the one with the highest avg battle score, SP1, and each build's most-winning member. Entries whose decision-matchup wins overlap by 90% or more are merged, because two spreads that win the same matchups are one offer.

13/15/14 -- Most matchups won (all nine shield scenarios) / Build 1's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 1, which guarantees 43 of the 60 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 1v1 Jellicent (grid 5%), 0v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (grid 5%) and 0v1 Deoxys (Defense) (grid 5%)

What else is true of 13/15/14

13/15/15 (Highest avg battle score and SP1) wins exactly the same decision matchups, so this entry is the offer and they are spellings of it.

15/13/6 -- Build 2's most-winning member

in: It is a member of Build 2, which guarantees 36 of the 48 decision matchups it wins.
rarest wins: 2v2 Dusknoir (grid 5%), 0v2 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (grid 12%) and 0v0 Walrein (grid 17%)

What to do with this: If you already have one of these spreads, build it: each is the top of this grid on the measure that named it. If you are hunting, hunt a build instead.

Wild catches needed to meet one named spread out of the 4096 on this grid: 2839 for a 50% chance, 5678 for a 75% chance. Model: the count assumes uniform-random IVs over the whole grid, which is a model of a wild encounter and is not verified for any other source.

The single-stat line

None of the 5 movesets on this page carries a line. This page is Fairy Wind / Bulldoze, Gigaton Hammer, and it carries no line; Fairy Wind / Bulldoze, Play Rough, Fairy Wind / Bulldoze, Heavy Slam, Fairy Wind / Bulldoze, Flash Cannon and Fairy Wind / Bulldoze carry no line.

Line: none
Closest: Def >= 170.58 -- 0v0 Walrein (Shadow), rank 41, 80 spreads of 4096 on the wrong side
SP1: 13/15/15 -- wins 315 of 567
Alternative: none (the widest pair that buys anything is already 62.5% of the grid)
Decision width: 0 matchups

No attack, defense or HP threshold decides a matchup for Tinkaton running Fairy Wind / Bulldoze, Gigaton Hammer in Ultra League; build for stat product. The closest thing to a line is 170.58 defense in the 0v0 against Walrein (Shadow), rank 41. Nothing below it wins, and 2224 of the 2304 spreads at or above it do. It is not a build line because 96.5% of the spreads at or above it win, under the 97% a rule with one clean side needs, and 80 of 4096 spreads sit on the wrong side of it, over the 20 a near-exact rule allows.

Bulk does not separate either: the only defense-and-HP pair that buys anything, 169.74 defense, is already 62.5% of the grid. SP1, 13/15/15 at L49.5, wins 315 of its 567 matchups, and is inside that pair. No spread on this grid wins more matchups than SP1 does, so the whole IV decision here is zero matchups wide.

rank-1

Shield scenario:

Why these regions

Why these regions and not others. The set panel below is every candidate region the builds were cut from. Under it, the same grid grouped by which contested matchups a spread wins -- its win/loss fingerprint, not its score -- drawn on the stat planes where a region is a shape; crossing a breakpoint or bulkpoint moves a spread to the next cluster.

The set panel (an UpSet plot: a bar chart of set intersections, Lex et al. 2014). Left: the named sets the lattice was built from (rows, labelled 'spreads in the set / decision matchups every member of it wins') and the candidate regions made by intersecting them (columns -- bar height is spreads, the number above it is decision matchups guaranteed in the shield scenarios this setting counts, and a coloured column is one of the builds in the table above). A dot means the region sits inside that row's set. The letters index THIS setting's own eight sets and are re-assigned when the Build criteria change, so compare the row names across Build criteria settings, not the letters.

clusters

Shield scenario:

Lattice view: 99% of this dive's IV spreads sit at the same level (L50) -- this species does not reach the league CP cap, so it is pinned at the max power-up level. At a fixed level each battle stat tracks a single IV, so attack / defense / HP each take only ~16 values and the panels look like a sparse grid: each visible point stacks the spreads that share a stat pair (up to 16, one per remaining IV). This is expected, not missing data -- the clustering still runs on the full set of win/loss fingerprints.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3221	136.3	170.2	171	#127-#4096	8.2	-
C1	875	137.3	173.9	176	#1-#2631	17.5	Mimikyu (+94pp), Virizion (+90pp), Seaking (+87pp), Shadow Lapras (+69pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Lapras	31%	100%
Shadow Walrein	45%	88%
Shadow Milotic	44%	96%
Registeel	46%	100%
Snorlax	55%	91%
Feraligatr	62%	92%
Seaking	6%	94%
Virizion	5%	95%
Mimikyu	4%	98%
Toucannon	70%	100%
Dusknoir	76%	91%
Runerigus	6%	74%
Empoleon	75%	100%
Tinkaton	12%	37%
Walrein	6%	55%
Shadow Snorlax	4%	57%
Dondozo	1%	59%
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	86%	94%
Lapras	86%	94%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	3%	15%
Shadow Corviknight	0%	23%
Shadow Steelix	95%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Lapras	46%	wins iff hp >= 173	83%	named
Shadow Walrein	54%	wins iff def >= 170.58	98%	named
Shadow Milotic	56%	wins iff sp >= 3,976,618	79%	named
Registeel	58%	wins iff hp >= 171	80%	named
Snorlax	62%	wins iff def >= 169.74	100%	named
Feraligatr	68%	wins iff sp >= 3,849,774	77%	named
Seaking	25%	wins iff sp >= 4,191,039	88%	named
Virizion	24%	wins iff hp >= 175	84%	named
Mimikyu	24%	wins iff hp >= 176	85%	named
Toucannon	77%	wins iff sp >= 3,813,793	83%	named
Dusknoir	79%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	98%	named
Runerigus	21%	wins iff sp >= 4,216,585	86%	named
Empoleon	80%	wins iff sp >= 3,791,439	86%	named
Tinkaton	17%	wins iff atk >= 140.75	91%	named
Walrein	17%	wins iff atk >= 142.43	89%	named
Shadow Snorlax	15%	wins iff sp >= 4,216,072	93%	named
Dondozo	14%	wins iff sp >= 4,296,181	89%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	88%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Lapras	88%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite)	6%	wins iff def >= 176.78	100%	named
Shadow Corviknight	5%	wins iff sp >= 4,391,878	95%	named
Shadow Steelix	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,711,226	98%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	512	130.7	171.0	172	#1045-#4096	0.9	-
C1	1536	134.0	171.0	172	#243-#4086	3.1	Galarian Moltres (+100pp), Shadow Ampharos (+100pp), Annihilape (+17pp)
C2	2048	139.9	171.0	172	#1-#3883	5.4	Shadow Giratina (Altered) (+100pp), Annihilape (+83pp), Shadow Cradily (+49pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	0%	0%	100%
Annihilape	0%	17%	100%
Shadow Cradily	2%	2%	51%
Shadow Steelix	84%	84%	84%
Galarian Moltres	0%	100%	100%
Shadow Ampharos	0%	100%	100%
Deoxys (Defense)	4%	6%	5%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	50%	wins iff atk >= 136.97	100%	named
Annihilape	56%	wins iff atk >= 136.13	100%	named
Shadow Cradily	27%	wins iff atk >= 140.33	98%	named
Shadow Steelix	84%	wins iff sp >= 3,768,010	88%	named
Galarian Moltres	88%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Shadow Ampharos	88%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	5%	wins iff sp >= 4,381,364	95%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1066	132.0	170.0	171	#1386-#4096	1.0	-
C1	2768	138.3	170.9	172	#17-#3883	3.9	Shadow Forretress (+85pp), Shadow Snorlax (+72pp), Cramorant (+67pp), Seismitoad (+54pp)
C2	262	135.9	175.8	177	#1-#2147	6.3	Jellicent (+97pp), Talonflame (+93pp), Shadow Corviknight (+57pp), Shadow Snorlax (+23pp); trades away Shadow Forretress (-22pp), Cramorant (-21pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2
Shadow Snorlax	0%	72%	95%
Shadow Corviknight	33%	43%	100%
Shadow Forretress	0%	85%	63%
Seismitoad	35%	89%	100%
Cramorant	33%	100%	79%
Jellicent	2%	3%	100%
Talonflame	0%	0%	93%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Snorlax	55%	wins iff atk >= 136.97	95%	named
Shadow Corviknight	44%	wins iff def >= 172.26	100%	named
Shadow Forretress	61%	wins iff atk >= 134.45	93%	named
Seismitoad	76%	wins iff sp >= 3,865,262	90%	named
Cramorant	81%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	100%	named
Jellicent	9%	wins iff sp >= 4,360,508	92%	named
Talonflame	6%	wins iff sp >= 4,375,711	95%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1792	132.8	171.0	172	#326-#4096	2.6	-
C1	2304	139.5	171.0	172	#1-#3943	6.0	Annihilape (+100pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (+100pp), Primarina (+64pp), Tinkaton (+33pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Annihilape	0%	100%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	0%	100%
Snorlax	62%	62%
Primarina	30%	95%
Walrein	80%	80%
Tinkaton	0%	33%
Ampharos	0%	19%
Shadow Dusknoir	87%	100%
Jellicent	0%	9%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Annihilape	56%	wins iff atk >= 136.13	100%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	56%	wins iff atk >= 136.13	100%	named
Snorlax	62%	wins iff def >= 169.74	100%	named
Primarina	67%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	85%	named
Walrein	80%	wins iff sp >= 3,791,439	85%	named
Tinkaton	19%	wins iff atk >= 140.75	100%	named
Ampharos	11%	wins iff atk >= 141.58	98%	named
Shadow Dusknoir	94%	wins iff sp >= 3,684,243	95%	named
Jellicent	5%	wins iff sp >= 4,360,508	96%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	168	135.7	165.7	167	#2713-#4096	2.0	-
C1	3928	136.6	171.2	172	#1-#4078	6.2	Ampharos (+100pp), Walrein (+94pp), Shadow Milotic (+66pp), Snorlax (+65pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Jellicent	50%	57%
Snorlax	0%	65%
Rillaboom	0%	37%
Dusknoir	43%	75%
Primarina	79%	90%
Walrein	0%	94%
Ampharos	0%	100%
Shadow Milotic	33%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Jellicent	56%	wins iff atk >= 136.13	100%	named
Snorlax	62%	wins iff def >= 169.74	100%	named
Rillaboom	35%	wins iff hp >= 174	87%	named
Dusknoir	74%	wins iff sp >= 3,890,238	87%	named
Primarina	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,756,875	92%	named
Walrein	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,723,237	92%	named
Ampharos	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,651,871	97%	named
Shadow Milotic	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,633,709	97%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1668	134.9	170.2	169	#618-#4096	3.2	-
C1	1404	134.9	172.0	176	#15-#3789	6.6	Primarina (+100pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (+98pp), Rillaboom (+77pp), Snorlax (+20pp)
C2	550	141.6	170.1	169	#217-#3482	6.8	Registeel (+100pp), Seaking (+100pp), Tinkaton (+75pp), Runerigus (+29pp); trades away Primarina (-100pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (-99pp), Rillaboom (-59pp), Snorlax (-21pp)
C3	474	141.5	172.0	175	#1-#1626	10.3	Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (+99pp), Primarina (+99pp), Rillaboom (+70pp), Runerigus (+31pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2	C3
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	2%	100%	1%	100%
Primarina	0%	100%	0%	99%
Runerigus	26%	39%	69%	100%
Rillaboom	0%	77%	18%	87%
Snorlax	53%	74%	53%	74%
Deoxys (Defense)	53%	74%	53%	74%
Registeel	0%	0%	100%	100%
Seaking	0%	0%	100%	100%
Tinkaton	0%	0%	75%	75%
Dusknoir	0%	0%	25%	17%
Ampharos	91%	100%	91%	100%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	95%	100%	95%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist)	47%	wins iff hp >= 173	88%	named
Primarina	46%	wins iff hp >= 173	89%	named
Runerigus	45%	wins iff sp >= 4,051,311	84%	named
Rillaboom	39%	wins iff hp >= 174	85%	named
Snorlax	62%	wins iff def >= 169.74	100%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	62%	wins iff def >= 169.74	100%	named
Registeel	25%	wins iff atk >= 140.33	100%	named
Seaking	25%	wins iff atk >= 140.33	100%	named
Tinkaton	19%	wins iff atk >= 140.75	100%	named
Dusknoir	5%	wins iff atk >= 142.85	100%	named
Ampharos	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,651,871	96%	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite)	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,619,056	97%	named

all scenarios: 65 win/loss bits (one per contested opponent per scenario) concatenated across 6 of 9 shield scenarios (0v2, 1v2, 2v0 excluded as degenerate); 1070 distinct win patterns; K=2 clusters (silhouette 0.29 - weak separation); split at atk 135.71.

Sharpest single scenarios on this page: 0v1 shields (K=3, silhouette 0.71 over 7 contested opponents, split atk 136.55) and 1v1 shields (K=2, silhouette 0.61 over 9 contested opponents, split atk 135.71) -- pick them in the dropdown above.

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1595	132.7	171.5	172	#326-#4096	25.5	-
C1	2501	139.0	170.6	173	#1-#3883	38.8	Annihilape [0v1] (+86pp), Annihilape [1v1] (+86pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [1v1] (+86pp), Jellicent [2v1] (+86pp)

Per-cluster win rates vs each contested opponent

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Giratina (Altered) [0v1]	0%	82%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [2v2]	43%	49%
Shadow Lapras [0v0]	44%	47%
Shadow Walrein [0v0]	61%	50%
Primarina [2v2]	42%	48%
Shadow Snorlax [1v0]	11%	83%
Runerigus [2v2]	14%	64%
Shadow Milotic [0v0]	34%	69%
Annihilape [0v1]	4%	90%
Annihilape [1v1]	4%	90%
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [1v1]	4%	90%
Jellicent [2v1]	4%	90%
Shadow Corviknight [1v0]	49%	40%
Registeel [0v0]	55%	60%
Rillaboom [2v2]	34%	42%
Shadow Forretress [1v0]	18%	89%
Snorlax [0v0]	71%	57%
Snorlax [1v1]	71%	57%
Snorlax [2v1]	71%	57%
Snorlax [2v2]	71%	57%
Deoxys (Defense) [2v2]	71%	57%
Rillaboom [2v1]	34%	36%
Primarina [1v1]	24%	94%
Feraligatr [0v0]	64%	71%
Shadow Cradily [0v1]	3%	42%
Dusknoir [2v1]	43%	93%
Registeel [2v2]	0%	41%
Seaking [2v2]	0%	41%
Seaking [0v0]	21%	28%
Seismitoad [1v0]	59%	86%
Virizion [0v0]	25%	23%
Mimikyu [0v0]	25%	23%
Toucannon [0v0]	71%	80%
Dusknoir [0v0]	52%	97%
Runerigus [0v0]	17%	23%
Walrein [1v1]	74%	83%
Empoleon [0v0]	75%	84%
Cramorant [1v0]	54%	99%
Tinkaton [1v1]	0%	31%
Tinkaton [2v2]	0%	31%
Tinkaton [0v0]	5%	25%
Walrein [0v0]	13%	19%
Shadow Steelix [0v1]	80%	86%
Shadow Snorlax [0v0]	0%	25%
Dondozo [0v0]	15%	12%
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [0v0]	68%	100%
Lapras [0v0]	68%	100%
Galarian Moltres [0v1]	68%	100%
Shadow Ampharos [0v1]	68%	100%
Ampharos [1v1]	0%	18%
Primarina [2v1]	74%	100%
Walrein [2v1]	87%	92%
Jellicent [1v0]	11%	8%
Talonflame [1v0]	7%	5%
Forretress (Bug Bite) [0v0]	7%	5%
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	86%	100%
Deoxys (Defense) [0v1]	6%	5%
Dusknoir [2v2]	0%	9%
Shadow Corviknight [0v0]	6%	4%
Jellicent [1v1]	0%	8%
Ampharos [2v2]	94%	96%
Ampharos [2v1]	94%	97%
Shadow Steelix [0v0]	90%	100%
Shadow Milotic [2v1]	96%	97%
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [2v2]	96%	98%

Green tint = the cluster mostly wins that matchup, red tint = mostly loses; the percentage is the share of the cluster's IVs that win.

Stat rules that reproduce the clusters (in-sample accuracy 95.0%)

atk < 135.71:
  def < 169.32:
    hp < 171.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=294)
    hp >= 171.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=378)
  def >= 169.32:
    -> cluster C0 (n=1120)
atk >= 135.71:
  atk < 136.55:
    hp < 170.50:
      -> cluster C0 (n=96)
    hp >= 170.50:
      -> cluster C1 (n=160)
  atk >= 136.55:
    -> cluster C1 (n=2048)

Depth-3 decision tree over (atk, def, hp). Accuracy is in-sample (regularized by a minimum leaf size), not cross-validated -- read it as "how well the clusters reduce to stat regions", not a prediction claim.

Matchup flip thresholds (candidate anchors)

The single stat and threshold that most accurately predicts win/loss across all IVs -- misclassifications allowed, so it is a diagnostic and a candidate anchor, not a build target. The "flips at" cutoffs under "Threats where your build choice matters" answer the other question (the lowest cutoff whose 75/25 split is clean) and are usually higher for the same opponent.

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Giratina (Altered) [0v1]	50%	wins iff atk >= 136.97	100%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [2v2]	47%	wins iff hp >= 173	88%	named
Shadow Lapras [0v0]	46%	wins iff hp >= 173	83%	named
Shadow Walrein [0v0]	54%	wins iff def >= 170.58	98%	named
Primarina [2v2]	46%	wins iff hp >= 173	89%	named
Shadow Snorlax [1v0]	55%	wins iff atk >= 136.97	95%	named
Runerigus [2v2]	45%	wins iff sp >= 4,051,311	84%	named
Shadow Milotic [0v0]	56%	wins iff sp >= 3,976,618	79%	named
Annihilape [0v1]	56%	wins iff atk >= 136.13	100%	named
Annihilape [1v1]	56%	wins iff atk >= 136.13	100%	named
Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [1v1]	56%	wins iff atk >= 136.13	100%	named
Jellicent [2v1]	56%	wins iff atk >= 136.13	100%	named
Shadow Corviknight [1v0]	44%	wins iff def >= 172.26	100%	named
Registeel [0v0]	58%	wins iff hp >= 171	80%	named
Rillaboom [2v2]	39%	wins iff hp >= 174	85%	named
Shadow Forretress [1v0]	61%	wins iff atk >= 134.45	93%	named
Snorlax [0v0]	62%	wins iff def >= 169.74	100%	named
Snorlax [1v1]	62%	wins iff def >= 169.74	100%	named
Snorlax [2v1]	62%	wins iff def >= 169.74	100%	named
Snorlax [2v2]	62%	wins iff def >= 169.74	100%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [2v2]	62%	wins iff def >= 169.74	100%	named
Rillaboom [2v1]	35%	wins iff hp >= 174	87%	named
Primarina [1v1]	67%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	85%	named
Feraligatr [0v0]	68%	wins iff sp >= 3,849,774	77%	named
Shadow Cradily [0v1]	27%	wins iff atk >= 140.33	98%	named
Dusknoir [2v1]	74%	wins iff sp >= 3,890,238	87%	named
Registeel [2v2]	25%	wins iff atk >= 140.33	100%	named
Seaking [2v2]	25%	wins iff atk >= 140.33	100%	named
Seaking [0v0]	25%	wins iff sp >= 4,191,039	88%	named
Seismitoad [1v0]	76%	wins iff sp >= 3,865,262	90%	named
Virizion [0v0]	24%	wins iff hp >= 175	84%	named
Mimikyu [0v0]	24%	wins iff hp >= 176	85%	named
Toucannon [0v0]	77%	wins iff sp >= 3,813,793	83%	named
Dusknoir [0v0]	79%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	98%	named
Runerigus [0v0]	21%	wins iff sp >= 4,216,585	86%	named
Walrein [1v1]	80%	wins iff sp >= 3,791,439	85%	named
Empoleon [0v0]	80%	wins iff sp >= 3,791,439	86%	named
Cramorant [1v0]	81%	wins iff atk >= 132.77	100%	named
Tinkaton [1v1]	19%	wins iff atk >= 140.75	100%	named
Tinkaton [2v2]	19%	wins iff atk >= 140.75	100%	named
Tinkaton [0v0]	17%	wins iff atk >= 140.75	91%	named
Walrein [0v0]	17%	wins iff atk >= 142.43	89%	named
Shadow Steelix [0v1]	84%	wins iff sp >= 3,768,010	88%	named
Shadow Snorlax [0v0]	15%	wins iff sp >= 4,216,072	93%	named
Dondozo [0v0]	14%	wins iff sp >= 4,296,181	89%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme) [0v0]	88%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Lapras [0v0]	88%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Galarian Moltres [0v1]	88%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Shadow Ampharos [0v1]	88%	wins iff atk >= 131.93	100%	named
Ampharos [1v1]	11%	wins iff atk >= 141.58	98%	named
Primarina [2v1]	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,756,875	92%	named
Walrein [2v1]	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,723,237	92%	named
Jellicent [1v0]	9%	wins iff sp >= 4,360,508	92%	named
Talonflame [1v0]	6%	wins iff sp >= 4,375,711	95%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite) [0v0]	6%	wins iff def >= 176.78	100%	named
Shadow Dusknoir [1v1]	94%	wins iff sp >= 3,684,243	95%	named
Deoxys (Defense) [0v1]	5%	wins iff sp >= 4,381,364	95%	named
Dusknoir [2v2]	5%	wins iff atk >= 142.85	100%	named
Shadow Corviknight [0v0]	5%	wins iff sp >= 4,391,878	95%	named
Jellicent [1v1]	5%	wins iff sp >= 4,360,508	96%	named
Ampharos [2v2]	95%	wins iff sp >= 3,651,871	96%	named
Ampharos [2v1]	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,651,871	97%	named
Shadow Steelix [0v0]	96%	wins iff sp >= 3,711,226	98%	named
Shadow Milotic [2v1]	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,633,709	97%	named
Forretress (Shadow) (Bug Bite) [2v2]	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,619,056	97%	named

Rows are ordered by discriminating power (win rate closest to 50%). "Rule accuracy" is how well that single stat threshold predicts the win/loss across all IVs, and is only shown when it beats always-predicting the majority outcome; high-accuracy UNNAMED rows are candidate new anchors. "Named" means an authored anchor names that opponent (alt-moveset / IV-variant rows inherit their base opponent's anchor).

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2677	136.5	169.5	171	#217-#4096	15.8	-
C1	1419	136.6	173.8	175	#1-#3443	29.0	Shadow Lapras [0v0] (+82pp), Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) [2v2] (+80pp), Primarina [2v2] (+78pp), Rillaboom [2v2] (+69pp)

Computed at bake time for moveset FAIRY_WIND / BULLDOZE, GIGATON_HAMMER with PvPoke default opponent IVs and bait-selective shield play, over the full opponent pool; this does not follow the scatter's moveset / opponent-IV / bait dropdowns or the opponent filter.

How this works

Per shield scenario: an opponent is contested when between 2% and 98% of this dive's IV spreads beat it (everyone else is settled and can't distinguish IVs). Each IV's fingerprint is its win/loss vector over those opponents; fingerprints are clustered bottom-up (agglomerative, Hamming distance, average linkage). The number of clusters, K, is chosen by silhouette -- a 0-to-1 score of how cleanly the fingerprints separate, where above about 0.5 the clusters are distinct groups and below 0.30 the headline says "weak separation" and the clusters are tendencies rather than tiers -- under a parsimony floor (a split must keep every cluster above a minimum size, and the smallest K in 2-6 within 0.03 of the best silhouette wins). Silhouettes are comparable between the scenarios on this page, not between species. Clusters are ordered weakest to strongest by mean contested wins. The scatter panels project the same 4,096 IV spreads onto each pair of battle stats; clusters that overlap completely in score separate cleanly there. A scenario is reported as degenerate (no clustering attempted) when it has fewer than 6 contested opponents or fewer than 8 distinct win patterns -- on that little data every candidate K scores near-perfectly, which is a measurement artifact and not structure -- and its bits are left out of the all scenarios fingerprint. A scenario that clears the floor but has no split keeping every cluster above the minimum size is reported as fragmented instead, and its bits still count toward the combined view. The all scenarios bits are ordered most-discriminating first, which is the tie-break the linkage uses when several merges are equally close. Replaces the retired score-gap cluster heuristic (2026-07), which usually (~77% of sampled runs) fired on float-level jitter in the opponent-averaged score, and even when it did catch a real tier could not name which matchups defined it.

Evidence

1. Header

Tinkaton -- Ultra League

FAIRY_WIND / BULLDOZE, GIGATON_HAMMER (arm 1 of 5)

Level view: L50. Bake 2026-09-26. Blob 20260926_185552_Tinkaton_ultra.replay.pkl.gz.

Opponent pool: 63 entries (Custom pool from ul_top60.txt (60 mons)). Grid: 4096 IV spreads x 9 shield scenarios.

Opponent-IV settings baked: PvPoke-default opponent IVs; PvPoke-default opponent IVs, focal never baits; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs; stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits.

Rankings snapshot 2026-09-26.

2. Floor

24 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

24 single-stat values do separate a cell exactly (18 on attack, 6 on Def, 0 on HP, over 84 contested cells), but none of them clears every gate while splitting between 25% and 60% of the grid, which is what an exact line has to do to carry a floor label.

The closest dirty thresholds on this dive, printed as evidence and not as lines:

At the one decimal place PvPoke and Poke Genie display, the top row reads Def >= 170.5, which selects 2304 spreads where the exact value selects 2304: 0 more spreads land inside a line printed that way. The table prints the exact value because it is the one that selects the set the counts beside it describe.

A split is listed only when it puts fewer spreads on the wrong side than the constant rule does (predict one outcome for the whole grid) and when it keeps between 10% and 90% of the grid on each side.

cell	rank	closest split	spreads on the wrong side	constant rule gets wrong	wins at/above	wins below
0v0 Walrein (Shadow)	rank 41	Def >= 170.58	80	1872	2224 of 2304	0 of 1792
1v0 Snorlax (Shadow)	rank 3	Atk >= 136.96	202	1846	2048 of 2048	202 of 2048
1v0 Forretress (Shadow)	rank 39	Atk >= 134.44	303	1583	2513 of 2816	0 of 1280
0v0 Lapras (Shadow)	rank 23	HP >= 173	689	1872	1615 of 2047	257 of 2049

3. Lines on the other stats

No axis carries a line on this arm, so there is nothing to compare across them.

4. Example spreads

Existence proofs; each selection rule is printed with its spread.

There is no line on this arm, so the rules run over the whole grid rather than over a set of clearers.

No spread on this grid wins more matchups than rank-1 does, so the whole IV decision here is zero matchups wide.

rule	IVs	level	Atk / Def / HP	stat product	contested cells	all cells
most cells won on the whole grid	13/15/14	L49.5	140.75 / 176.78 / 177	99.44% (#10)	81	315
highest stat product (the rank-1 spread)	13/15/15	L49.5	140.75 / 176.78 / 178	100.00% (#1)	81	315
bulkiest (max Def x HP) among the whole grid with SP >= 95%	4/15/14	L50.0	133.61 / 177.30 / 178	95.21% (#551)	64	298

Cells won by shield scenario

spread	0v0	0v1	0v2	1v0	1v1	1v2	2v0	2v1	2v2	total
rank-1 13/15/15	41	17	10	56	31	15	62	49	34	315
13/15/14	41	17	10	56	31	15	62	49	34	315
13/15/15	41	17	10	56	31	15	62	49	34	315
4/15/14	39	15	10	55	27	13	61	48	30	298

5. Rank-1 check

Stat-product rank-1 is 13/15/15 at L49.5: 140.75 attack / 176.78 Def / 178 HP. It wins 315 of 567 cells (81 of the 84 contested ones).

There is no floor on this arm, so there is no line for it to be on one side of.

It is a member of the Alternative target below.

6. Alternative target

Def >= 169.74: 2560 spreads (62.5%), stat product 82.9% to 100.0% of rank-1, attack 130.25-142.85.

62.5% of the grid already satisfies this, so it is not a target to hunt for. Read it the other way round: the 37.5% of spreads outside it lose 5 contested matchups that every member wins: 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11), 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11), 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11), 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11), 2v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42).

Rule: among (Def, HP) rectangles with at least 100 members, the one winning the most contested cells with EVERY member that at most 1% of the spreads outside it win, counting only cells against a top-50 opponent in a non-degenerate scenario; ties broken by member count.

Members win 252-315 cells in total.

IV envelope of the members -- attack IV 0-15, Def IV 6-15, HP IV 0-15. Members per attack IV: 0: 160, 1: 160, 2: 160, 3: 160, 4: 160, 5: 160, 6: 160, 7: 160, 8: 160, 9: 160, 10: 160, 11: 160, 12: 160, 13: 160, 14: 160, 15: 160.

Highest stat product inside it: 13/15/15 at L49.5 (100.00% of rank-1), 12/15/14 at L50.0 (99.999% of rank-1), 12/15/15 at L50.0 (99.999% of rank-1), 13/13/14 at L50.0 (99.64% of rank-1), 13/14/13 at L50.0 (99.56% of rank-1).

7. Cost

This test finds no reverse single-stat clean cut: no cell on this dive is won by every LOW spread and lost by every high one.

8. Rungs above

No floor on this arm, so no ladder above one.

9. Material clean cuts

Clean cuts holding between 10% and 90% of the grid, ascending. The widest of them sit under nearly every spread on the grid; the narrow ones at the bottom of the table do not.

cut	cells owned	spreads	settings	mechanism
Atk >= 131.92	0v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme) (rank 7), 0v0 Lapras (rank 22), 0v1 Moltres (Galarian) (rank 13), +1 more cells	3584 (87.5%)	2/4	0v0 Zygarde (Complete Forme): Mechanism: BULLDOZE damage steps 48 -> 49 across the cut. 0v0 Lapras: Mechanism: GIGATON_HAMMER damage steps 89 -> 90 across the cut. 0v1 Moltres (Galarian): Mechanism: GIGATON_HAMMER damage steps 76 -> 77 across the cut.
Atk >= 132.76	1v0 Cramorant (rank 18)	3328 (81.2%)	4/4	Mechanism: BULLDOZE damage steps 18 -> 19 across the cut.
Atk >= 133.60	0v2 Cresselia (rank 35)	3072 (75.0%)	2/4	Mechanism: FAIRY_WIND damage steps 2 -> 3 across the cut.
Atk >= 134.44	2v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39)	2816 (68.8%)	2/4	Mechanism: GIGATON_HAMMER damage steps 56 -> 57 across the cut.
Atk >= 135.28	1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17)	2560 (62.5%)	2/4	Mechanism: charge-move priority against Giratina (Altered). That Giratina (Altered) is built at 5/15/8, L27.5, 134.50 attack; 1.0 x 134.50 = 134.50, which falls in the gap (134.44, 135.29] between the last attainable attack below the cut and the cut itself.
Atk >= 136.12	0v1 Annihilape (rank 59), 1v1 Annihilape (rank 59), 1v1 Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (rank 59), +1 more cells	2304 (56.2%)	1-2 of 4	Mechanism: FAIRY_WIND damage steps 5 -> 6 across the cut.
Atk >= 136.96	0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32)	2048 (50.0%)	2/4	Mechanism: FAIRY_WIND damage steps 5 -> 6 across the cut.
Atk >= 140.33	2v2 Registeel (rank 28), 2v2 Seaking (rank 45)	1024 (25.0%)	2/4	2v2 Registeel: Mechanism: BULLDOZE damage steps 48 -> 49 across the cut. 2v2 Seaking: Mechanism: GIGATON_HAMMER damage steps 52 -> 53 across the cut at focal Atk stage -1.
Atk >= 140.75	1v1 Tinkaton (rank 1), 2v2 Tinkaton (rank 1)	768 (18.8%)	4/4	Mechanism: BULLDOZE damage steps 66 -> 67 across the cut.

10. Bulk

Clean cuts by axis: 18 on attack, 6 on Def, 0 on HP.

11. Coverage

Omitted: there is no floor on this arm, so there is no line to place.

12. Mirror

Against the pool's own Tinkaton entry. Seat: our side is the optimised row; the mirror opponent always baits.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 705 0 0 4096 762 0 4096 4096 762.

Against a mirror built at stat-product rank-1 opponent IVs, focal never baits, the count of our spreads (of 4096) that win, by shield scenario 0v0 through 2v2: 705 0 0 4096 762 0 4096 4096 762.

shields	win rate over the whole grid
0v0	17.2%
0v1	0.0%
0v2	0.0%
1v0	100.0%
1v1	18.8%
1v2	0.0%
2v0	100.0%
2v1	100.0%
2v2	18.8%

13. Changes the score, not the matchup

Cells won (or lost) by every spread where the battle score still steps by at least 60 at one attainable attack value.

Ordered by how close the step comes to the win line (500), nearest first: the question this field answers is how close a cell is to becoming a matchup, not how large the swing inside it is.

12 of 25 steps are listed, closest to the win line first; 13 more are not.

value	cell	rank	score step	points from 500	outcome
Atk >= 142.85	1v1 Dusknoir	rank 24	420 -> 483	17 (closing)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 136.96	1v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow)	rank 32	581 -> 716	81 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 131.92	1v1 Moltres (Galarian)	rank 13	587 -> 647	87 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 140.33	1v2 Registeel	rank 28	411 -> 291	89 (widening)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 133.60	2v2 Cresselia	rank 35	603 -> 674	103 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 140.33	2v1 Snorlax (Shadow)	rank 3	395 -> 334	105 (widening)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 140.33	1v1 Cradily (Shadow)	rank 53	620 -> 743	120 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 140.75	1v2 Cradily (Shadow)	rank 53	620 -> 710	120 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 140.33	0v2 Registeel	rank 28	379 -> 261	121 (widening)	lost on both sides
Atk >= 138.64	0v0 Clefable	rank 37	623 -> 765	123 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 131.92	1v0 Lapras	rank 22	632 -> 740	132 (widening)	won on both sides
Atk >= 131.92	2v1 Ampharos (Shadow)	rank 55	643 -> 713	143 (widening)	won on both sides

14. Not claimed

60 of 84 contested matchups have no clean single-stat rule and are not claimed.

6 of 47 top-50 matchups are listed, one per base species and closest to an even split first; 41 more are not.

cell	rank	win rate over the whole grid
0v0 Lapras (Shadow)	rank 23	45.7%
0v0 Walrein (Shadow)	rank 41	54.3%
1v0 Snorlax (Shadow)	rank 3	54.9%
2v2 Runerigus	rank 43	44.9%
0v0 Milotic (Shadow)	rank 50	55.5%
0v0 Registeel	rank 28	57.8%

15. How sure

18 clean attack cuts, 6 on Def, 0 on HP, over 84 contested cells (234 cells are won by every spread, 249 lost by every spread).

Scenarios barred from carrying a floor -- fewer than 6 contested cells, or fewer than 8 distinct opponent columns among them; the dive page's "degenerate" flag applies the same two numbers to its own stricter counts, so it can flag a different set: 1v2 (5 contested, 7 distinct opponent columns), 2v0 (3 contested, 5 distinct opponent columns).

Not measured here: opponent IVs outside the baked cohorts, post-match HP and shields, XL or dust cost, and any live-game check of the priority convention.

16. Provenance

Every threshold in this section is one of three things, and each is badged where it is printed. An EXACT clean cut: every spread at or above it wins the named cell and no spread below it does. A ONE-SIDED GATE: one side is pure and the other is at least 97% pure -- either nothing below it wins (clearing it is necessary) or everything at or above it wins (clearing it is sufficient). A NEAR-EXACT split: at most 0.5% of the grid sits on the wrong side of it in total. The win predicate is gopvpsim.battle.is_win (score > 500; 500 itself is a tie, not a win).

That is stricter than the two numbers the dive page prints for the same opponent: the Threats "flips at" boundary (a 75/25 gate, so spreads on the passing side can still lose) and the Matchup clusters flip table's single-stat split for that one opponent (the most accurate such split, misclassifications allowed). The cluster line in "How sure" above is a third thing again: not one opponent but the stat rule that reproduces that section's "all scenarios" partition of the whole grid.

Priority ties: the coverage ladder counts an exact attack tie as NOT beaten. The engine is seat-dependent on an exact tie, so a tied line is not a guarantee in either direction.

Ranks and opponent builds are read live from the 2026-09-26 rankings snapshot and the current gamemaster; this blob carries no gamemaster stamp, so the render is a function of the blob plus those two live reads.

Auto-derived: this section is generated by scripts/deep_dive_brief.py from the replay blob. No human prose is in it.

How the line was selected (gates and guards)

Decision band for the floor (D1): the lowest ELIGIBLE rung whose clearer pool sits inside [25%, 60%] of the grid. Materiality band for a rung: [10%, 90%].

To be ELIGIBLE AS THE FLOOR -- not to be listed as a rung -- a cut needs at least 20 attack/20 defense/5 HP distinct attainable values below it, an opponent of rank 50 or better outside the caveat list, a non-degenerate shield scenario, a win rate at or above the cut of at least 90% in every setting, and a closed-form mechanism. Listing is a weaker bar: a rung is printed when it keeps 25% of the grid (above the floor) or sits in the materiality band (below it) AND points the same way in at least 2 settings, so a listed rung may be unattributed, low-ranked or 2-of-4.

A cut can fail several gates at once, so the failure tally below sums to more than the number of cuts.

Co-gate sub-rectangles need 5% of the grid; the alternative target needs 100 members; a score-only step needs 60 points. These constants are calibrated on one species and are parameters of the stage that uses them, not tuned per dive.

Floor pool by primitive on the attack axis -- the axis the cross-stat rule selected -- each selected on its own under the same band and the same gates: exact -> Atk >= 136.12 (0v1 Annihilape, 56.2%) rejected on G-material-gap, G-direction (1 of 4 settings); one-sided gate -> no candidate in the band; near-exact -> no candidate in the band. Selected: no floor. Selection takes the lowest eligible rung in the band; a stronger primitive within 0.50 stat points of it wins the tie, in the order exact, one-sided gate, near-exact. A gate needs 97% of its dirty side pointing the right way; a near-exact split needs at most 0.5% of the grid on the wrong side. Only exact rungs merge, in either direction.

Degradation ladder: rung reached = c. 24 clean cuts exist on this dive and none is a floor: no exact cut, one-sided gate or near-exact split clears every gate with a pool share inside [25%, 60%] of the grid.

Of 24 clean cuts, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-material-gap 23, G-direction 15, G-rank 4, G-scenario 2, G-material-lo 1.

Of 28 one-sided gate and near-exact candidates, 0 clear every gate. Gate failures: G-material-gap 27, G-material-hi 24, G-attributed 23, G-direction 8, G-rank 8, G-scenario 6, G-material-lo 1.

Closest dirty thresholds on cells with no clean rule: 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) Def >= 170.58 (80 spreads on the wrong side); 1v0 Snorlax (Shadow) Atk >= 136.96 (202 spreads on the wrong side); 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) Atk >= 134.44 (303 spreads on the wrong side); 0v0 Lapras (Shadow) HP >= 173 (689 spreads on the wrong side).

band	attack line it selects	cell
[25%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 55%]	no floor	-
[25%, 50%]	no floor	-
[20%, 60%]	no floor	-
[30%, 60%]	no floor	-
[25%, 70%]	no floor	-

Terms used here

build criteria: Which shield scenarios the ranking counts: all nine equally, the three even ones, or 1v1 alone.
build: A region of the IV grid you can aim at -- every spread that clears the same combination of thresholds, at least fifty of them.
guaranteed: Won by every single spread in the region, not by most of them.
decision matchup: A (shield scenario, opponent) pair the IV choice decides: a top-50 opponent that some spreads on this grid beat and others lose to.
wide: The looser rule drawn around a region of the grid: it holds every spread that region holds and more, so it wins less for every member but is easier to hit.
stat-product rank-1 (SP1): The IV spread with the largest attack x defense x HP at this league's CP cap -- the bulk-first spread most IV tools list first. Written SP1 where it is named repeatedly.
material: A matchup no single-stat threshold of a hundred or more spreads wins more than 95% of the time, so it takes two stats at once to claim it.
opponent-IV mode: One of the ways every opponent was made for this bake -- PvPoke-default IVs or the bulkiest ones, each with and without the focal side baiting -- so a claim that holds in all of them does not depend on how the opponent was made.
stat product: Attack x defense x HP at the league's CP cap, the usual one-number summary of an IV spread.
staircase: A rule whose defense floor steps DOWN as HP goes up, so bulk can be spent on either stat: one floor per HP value rather than one floor for all of them.
fork: A second region with no spread in common with the first that wins a noticeably different set of matchups outright -- the two overlap on less than 80% of them -- so they are a real choice rather than two spellings of one.
outside rate: How often the spreads left OUT of a region win the same matchup its own members all win -- one the rest of the grid takes anyway is not what you bought.
charge-move priority (CMP): When both sides throw a charged move on the same turn, the higher attack stat goes first.
UpSet plot: A bar chart of set intersections: each column is one candidate region, and the dots under it mark which named sets it lies inside (Lex et al. 2014).
contested matchups: The matchups some IV spreads on this grid win and others lose -- the only ones an IV choice can change.
bulkpoint: A defense value across which an opponent's damage into you steps down by a whole point, or an HP value across which the number of hits they need to knock you out changes.
one-sided gate: A stat value with one clean side: either nothing below it wins the matchup, or everything at or above it does -- so clearing it is required, or enough, but not both.
rung: An attack value above the line at which some further matchup flips for every spread that reaches it.

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 139.90 and Def >= 172.90 and HP >= 175	186	44 of 61, 0 of them material; 34 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v2 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (outside 16%)	1: 2v2 Registeel	12/13/12 (315 of 567 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (44 of 61), its 186 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (16) 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 20%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 30% 0v0 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 30% 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 33%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 (3) 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 54% 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 88% 0v2 (3) 0v2 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 16%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 73%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 80% 1v0 (4) 1v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 47% 1v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 63% 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 69% 1v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 87% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 67% 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 88% 1v2 (4) 1v2 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 37%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 67%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (1) 2v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 74% 2v1 (5) 2v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 43% 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 61%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 67% 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 81% 2v2 (5) 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 28%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 55% 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 67% Members (186), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 134.00 and Def >= 172.90 and HP >= 175	480	36 of 61, 0 of them material; 23 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	9: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v0 Seaking, +7 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 186 spreads in 480 of its own, and keeps 36 of Build 1's 44 guaranteed matchups (none of them material). The 8 it gives up out here: 0v2 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (grid 20%), 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 24%) and 2v2 Seaking (grid 31%), and 5 more.
Build 2 (fork)	no two- or three-stat rule fits; 278 spreads by list	278	30 of 61, 0 of them material; 20 hold under every opponent-IV mode	2v2 Registeel (outside 26%)	15: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v0 Virizion, +13 more	14/15/4 (303 of 567 matchups)
What Build 2 guarantees (30 of 61), its 278 members all inside attack IV 11-15, defense IV 6-15, HP IV 0-6; that box also holds 72 spreads that are not members No two- or three-stat rule fits it; the list is the build. 0v0 (7) 0v0 Walrein (Shadow) (rank 41) -- outside 59% 0v0 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 66% 0v0 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 86% 0v0 Empoleon (rank 8) -- outside 89% 0v1 (3) 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 53%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 88% 0v2 (2) 0v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 72%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 80% 1v0 (3) 1v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 62% 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 69% 1v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 87% 1v1 (2) 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 66% 1v2 (3) 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 66%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (1) 2v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 73% 2v1 (4) 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 60%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 66% 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 80%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 (5) 2v2 Registeel (rank 28) -- outside 26%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 26%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 54%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 66% Members (278), highest stat product first
Build 3 (bulk)	Atk >= 134.00 and Def >= 173.40 and HP >= 175	414	37 of 61, 0 of them material; 24 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Virizion (outside 25%)	8: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), +6 more	12/13/12 (315 of 567 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (37 of 61), its 414 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (15) 0v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 25% 0v0 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 26% 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 29%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 31% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 87% 0v2 (2) 0v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 71%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 79%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (3) 1v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 44% 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 68%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 86% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 65% 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 87% 1v2 (3) 1v2 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 34%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (1) 2v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 72%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (4) 2v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 40% 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 65% 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 80% 2v2 (4) 2v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 46%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 53%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 65% 2v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 65% Members (414), highest stat product first

Build	Rule	Spreads	Guarantees (in the counted shields / overall)	Rarest win	Gives up	Best member (in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields) / SP1
Build 1 (primary)	Atk >= 139.90 and Def >= 172.90 and HP >= 175	186	24 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 44 of 61 overall, 0 of them material; 34 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v2 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (outside 16%)	nothing the other builds guarantee	12/13/12 (106 of 189 matchups)
What Build 1 guarantees (24 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 44 of 61 overall), its 186 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (16) 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 20%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 30% 0v0 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 30% 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 33%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v1 (3) 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 54% 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 88% 0v2 (3) 0v2 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (rank 32) -- outside 16%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 73%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 80% 1v0 (4) 1v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 47% 1v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (rank 3) -- outside 63% 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 69% 1v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 87% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 67% 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 88% 1v2 (4) 1v2 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 37%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v2 Giratina (Altered) (rank 17) -- outside 67%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (1) 2v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 74% 2v1 (5) 2v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 43% 2v1 Jellicent (rank 16) -- outside 61%; holds in 3 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 67% 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 81% 2v2 (5) 2v2 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 28%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 50%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 55% 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 67% Members (186), highest stat product first
Build 1 wide	Atk >= 134.00 and Def >= 172.90 and HP >= 175	480	21 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 36 of 61 overall, 0 of them material; 23 hold under every opponent-IV mode	--	8: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v0 Seaking, +6 more	--
What the wider rule keeps and gives up The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. The looser target around Build 1, for a reader who cannot hit Build 1 exactly. It holds every one of Build 1's 186 spreads in 480 of its own, and keeps 21 of Build 1's 24 guaranteed matchups in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields (36 of its 44 overall, none of them material). The 8 it gives up out here: 0v2 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow) (grid 20%), 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow) (grid 24%) and 2v2 Seaking (grid 31%), and 5 more.
Build 3 (bulk)	Atk >= 134.00 and Def >= 173.40 and HP >= 175	414	22 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 37 of 61 overall, 0 of them material; 24 hold under every opponent-IV mode	0v0 Virizion (outside 25%)	7: 0v0 Snorlax (Shadow), 0v1 Giratina (Altered) (Shadow), +5 more	12/13/12 (106 of 189 matchups); SP1 in
What Build 3 guarantees (22 of 35 in 0v0 / 1v1 / 2v2 shields; 37 of 61 overall), its 414 members The rule fits exactly: these spreads and no others. 0v0 (15) 0v0 Virizion (rank 6) -- outside 25% 0v0 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 26% 0v0 Mimikyu (rank 10) -- outside 29%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v0 Seaking (rank 45) -- outside 31% 0v1 (2) 0v1 Steelix (Shadow) (rank 47) -- outside 87% 0v2 (2) 0v2 Muk (Alolan) (rank 36) -- outside 71%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 0v2 Cresselia (rank 35) -- outside 79%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 (3) 1v0 Corviknight (Shadow) (rank 4) -- outside 44% 1v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 68%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 1v0 Cramorant (rank 18) -- outside 86% 1v1 (3) 1v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 65% 1v1 Walrein (rank 40) -- outside 87% 1v2 (3) 1v2 Toucannon (rank 49) -- outside 34%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v0 (1) 2v0 Forretress (Shadow) (rank 39) -- outside 72%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v1 (4) 2v1 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 40% 2v1 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 65% 2v1 Dusknoir (rank 24) -- outside 80% 2v2 (4) 2v2 Rillaboom (rank 21) -- outside 46%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Runerigus (rank 43) -- outside 53%; holds in 2 of 4 opponent-IV modes 2v2 Snorlax (rank 11) -- outside 65% 2v2 Deoxys (Defense) (rank 42) -- outside 65% Members (414), highest stat product first

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	2458	136.9	170.7	171	#494-#4096	8.9	-
C1	1638	138.0	173.8	176	#1-#3497	17.2	Seaking (+95pp), Mimikyu (+82pp), Virizion (+77pp), Shadow Lapras (+72pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Lapras	28%	100%
Seaking	0%	95%
Shadow Walrein	49%	82%
Mimikyu	3%	85%
Runerigus	7%	72%
Virizion	2%	79%
Snorlax	57%	86%
Shadow Milotic	54%	93%
Registeel	51%	100%
Walrein	10%	58%
Shadow Snorlax	4%	55%
Dondozo	0%	59%
Feraligatr	71%	90%
Tinkaton	10%	35%
Forretress (Bug Bite)	9%	29%
Toucannon	77%	100%
Dusknoir	86%	90%
Empoleon	83%	100%
Shadow Corviknight	0%	21%
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	93%	95%
Lapras	93%	96%
Primarina	5%	3%
Shadow Steelix	95%	100%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Lapras	57%	wins iff hp >= 173	82%	named
Seaking	38%	wins iff sp >= 4,185,219	84%	named
Shadow Walrein	62%	wins iff def >= 170.25	100%	named
Mimikyu	36%	wins iff hp >= 176	84%	named
Runerigus	33%	wins iff sp >= 4,199,953	80%	named
Virizion	33%	wins iff hp >= 175	83%	named
Snorlax	69%	wins iff def >= 169.74	100%	named
Shadow Milotic	70%	wins iff sp >= 3,953,570	81%	named
Registeel	70%	wins iff hp >= 171	81%	named
Walrein	29%	wins iff atk >= 142.43	82%	named
Shadow Snorlax	24%	wins iff sp >= 4,245,059	89%	named
Dondozo	24%	wins iff hp >= 177	88%	named
Feraligatr	79%	wins iff sp >= 3,825,351	81%	named
Tinkaton	20%	wins iff atk >= 140.75	84%	named
Forretress (Bug Bite)	17%	wins iff def >= 176.67	100%	named
Toucannon	86%	wins iff sp >= 3,814,349	90%	named
Dusknoir	87%	wins iff atk >= 132.71	100%	named
Empoleon	90%	wins iff sp >= 3,789,970	92%	named
Shadow Corviknight	8%	wins iff sp >= 4,391,449	93%	named
Zygarde (Complete Forme)	94%	wins iff atk >= 131.87	100%	named
Lapras	94%	wins iff atk >= 131.87	100%	named
Primarina	4%	wins iff atk >= 143.70	100%	named
Shadow Steelix	97%	wins iff sp >= 3,759,888	99%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	1792	133.6	172.0	173	#161-#4096	2.9	-
C1	2304	140.2	171.9	173	#1-#3943	5.6	Shadow Giratina (Altered) (+100pp), Annihilape (+86pp), Shadow Cradily (+41pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	0%	100%
Annihilape	14%	100%
Shadow Cradily	7%	48%
Deoxys (Defense)	14%	11%
Shadow Steelix	89%	89%
Shadow Ampharos	86%	100%
Galarian Moltres	86%	100%
Toucannon	0%	9%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	56%	wins iff atk >= 136.94	100%	named
Annihilape	62%	wins iff atk >= 136.09	100%	named
Shadow Cradily	30%	wins iff atk >= 140.33	95%	named
Deoxys (Defense)	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,369,142	90%	named
Shadow Steelix	89%	wins iff sp >= 3,795,639	91%	named
Shadow Ampharos	94%	wins iff atk >= 131.87	100%	named
Galarian Moltres	94%	wins iff atk >= 131.87	100%	named
Toucannon	5%	wins iff atk >= 143.28	100%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	3788	137.3	171.6	173	#34-#4096	2.0	-
C1	308	137.9	176.2	178	#1-#2251	4.6	Shadow Cresselia (+92pp), Shadow Giratina (Altered) (+55pp), Shadow Cradily (+49pp), Shadow Alolan Ninetales (+36pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1
Shadow Cradily	26%	75%
Alolan Muk	72%	100%
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	16%	70%
Cresselia	81%	83%
Shadow Cresselia	5%	96%
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	1%	37%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Cradily	30%	wins iff atk >= 140.33	95%	named
Alolan Muk	74%	wins iff sp >= 3,944,983	84%	named
Shadow Giratina (Altered)	20%	wins iff sp >= 4,266,546	91%	named
Cresselia	81%	wins iff atk >= 133.56	100%	named
Shadow Cresselia	12%	wins iff sp >= 4,370,468	90%	named
Shadow Alolan Ninetales	4%	wins iff sp >= 4,423,399	96%	named

Cluster	IVs	atk (mean)	def (mean)	hp (mean)	SP rank	contested wins (mean)	gains vs previous cluster
C0	991	132.8	170.6	172	#1953-#4096	1.6	-
C1	92	131.4	175.4	178	#902-#2928	4.1	Jellicent (+100pp), Shadow Snorlax (+65pp), Talonflame (+54pp), Shadow Corviknight (+52pp); trades away Cramorant (-58pp)
C2	2408	139.4	171.6	173	#97-#3883	4.2	Shadow Forretress (+100pp), Cramorant (+100pp); trades away Jellicent (-100pp), Talonflame (-54pp), Shadow Corviknight (-42pp)
C3	605	137.4	175.2	178	#1-#3245	6.2	Jellicent (+96pp), Talonflame (+53pp), Shadow Corviknight (+42pp), Shadow Snorlax (+19pp); trades away Shadow Forretress (-19pp)

Contested opponent	C0	C1	C2	C3
Shadow Corviknight	35%	87%	45%	87%
Shadow Snorlax	5%	70%	81%	100%
Shadow Forretress	0%	0%	100%	81%
Jellicent	0%	100%	0%	96%
Seismitoad	61%	100%	94%	100%
Cramorant	58%	0%	100%	100%
Talonflame	0%	54%	0%	53%

Contested opponent	Win rate	Best single-stat rule	Rule accuracy	Named anchor?
Shadow Corviknight	50%	wins iff def >= 172.26	100%	named
Shadow Snorlax	65%	wins iff atk >= 136.94	91%	named
Shadow Forretress	71%	wins iff atk >= 134.40	96%	named
Jellicent	16%	wins iff sp >= 4,368,398	87%	named
Seismitoad	87%	wins iff sp >= 3,859,268	94%	named
Cramorant	88%	wins iff atk >= 132.71	100%	named
Talonflame	9%	wins iff sp >= 4,382,046	93%	named

Moveset: Switching movesets reloads the page; pasted CSV will need to be re-loaded. Shields: Build criteria: Opponent IVs: Bait: Y-axis: Color: Anchors: Build criteria weights shield scenarios in: Which one to build?, the all-scenarios clusters, and Shields = All (by build criteria). Nothing else on this page is re-weighted by it. Threshold tiers (e.g. GH Great / GH Good) are expert stat-cutoff regions defined in Threshold Tiers below. Hover legend to isolate; click to lock.

Check my collection - Your collection stays in your browser; nothing is uploaded.

Paste your Poke Genie CSV export below, or click Choose file… to load one from disk. You’ll see which of your Tinkatons (and pre-evolutions) qualify for each tier, overlaid on the scatter plot.

Show only my mons

Or enter one at a time - Atk/Def/HP IVs (0-15), level, shadow flag. Same format as PvPoke / PvPIVs.

Species Atk Def HP Level Shadow

Compare candidates - up to 7 of your IV spreads, side by side: wins, mirror, and the close calls that decide the build

Add a spread: Atk Def HP 0 / 7 added

Highlight IVs:

Top IVs Rows: Ranked by this dive's battle simulation (not fetched from PvPoke). Click any column header to sort.

Battle-Rating Distribution

Per-matchup battle-rating distribution for the reference IV (PvPoke default or Rank 1, matching the Opponent-IVs dropdown) across the opponent pool, under the currently-selected Shields / Opponent-IVs / Bait.

Fairy Wind / Bulldoze, Gigaton Hammer

IV Recommendations

Moveset: Fairy Wind / Bulldoze, Gigaton Hammer. Vs PvPoke default opponents.

IV Flavor Guide (Simulation)

Auto-generated from simulation matchup data. Flavor names (e.g. "Premium Bulk", "Fortified {Opp}", "{Opp} Slayer") are derived from which opponents each IV cluster beats, not from the expert-authored Threshold Tiers section above. This IV Flavor Guide and the Threshold Tiers answer different questions and may not line up 1:1. New to flavor cards? The IV Flavor Guide walks through the six name families and the trade-off layout.

Charm-class fast moves typically favor stat product on Tinkaton: more attacks in, more fast moves survived, usually outweighs one extra charge-move damage.

In Ultra League, Tinkaton has 5 flavors: General Good, Fortified Ampharos, Fortified Forretress (Shadow), Dondozo Slayer, and Tinkaton Mirror Atk. In general, the General Good variation may be the flavor of choice, as it plays up Tinkaton's potential vs Registeel, Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist), Corviknight, among others.

Flavor	IVs	%	Catches needed
General Good [Recommended]	2700	65.9%	almost any will do
Fortified Ampharos	88	2.1%	~32-64 for a 50-75% chance
Fortified Forretress (Shadow)	88	2.1%	~32-64 for a 50-75% chance
Dondozo Slayer	108	2.6%	~26-52 for a 50-75% chance
Tinkaton Mirror Atk	491	12.0%	~6-11 for a 50-75% chance

General Good (130.50 Atk, 164.73 Def, 169 HP) [Recommended]

164.73 Def and 169 HP is a safe baseline for Tinkaton, with an attack floor of 130.50 Atk for coverage against key opponents.

169 HP is also a safe spot, helping secure the mirror and key matchups vs Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist), Cradily.

165.54 Def with 169+ HP for Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v2), Lapras (incl. Shadow) (0v0), Primarina (2v2), Registeel (0v0), Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2), Ninetales (Alolan) (incl. Shadow) (0v2, 1v2), Dusknoir (2v1), Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2), Virizion (0v0), Walrein (incl. Shadow) (0v0)
166.38 Def with 169+ HP for Milotic (incl. Shadow) (0v0), Cresselia (incl. Shadow) (0v2)
167.22 Def with 171+ HP for Deoxys (Defense) (2v2), Seaking (0v0), Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2), Corviknight (incl. Shadow) (1v0), Seismitoad (2v0), Muk (Alolan) (1v2)
168.06 Def with 170+ HP for Mimikyu (0v0), Virizion (0v0), Deoxys (Defense) (2v2), Giratina (Altered) (incl. Shadow) (0v2), Muk (Alolan) (0v2)
168.90 Def with 175+ HP for Walrein (incl. Shadow) (0v0), Dondozo (0v0), Runerigus (0v0)
169.74 Def with 174+ HP for Jellicent (1v0), Mimikyu (0v0)
170.58 Def with 174+ HP for Corviknight (incl. Shadow) (1v0), Runerigus (0v0), Seismitoad (2v0)
170.91 Def for the Toucannon (1v2 with bait)

Fortified Ampharos (176.69 Def, 174 HP)

The "Fortified Ampharos" Tinkaton fortifies its bulk to gain several matchups including the Ampharos 1v1, the Corviknight (Shadow) 0v0, the Deoxys (Defense) 0v1. This requires 176.69 Def with 174 HP.

Fortified Forretress (Shadow) (176.61 Def, 174 HP)

The "Fortified Forretress (Shadow)" Tinkaton fortifies its bulk to gain several matchups including the Forretress (Shadow) 2v1, the Corviknight (Shadow) 0v0, the Deoxys (Defense) 0v1. This requires 176.61 Def with 174 HP.

Dondozo Slayer (142.81 Atk, 172 HP)

The "Dondozo Slayer" Tinkaton trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Dondozo 2v2, the Ampharos 1v1, the Blastoise 1v1. Tinkaton would need 142.81 Atk while maintaining 172 HP.

Tinkaton Mirror Atk (141.63 Atk, 166 HP)

The "Tinkaton Mirror Atk" Tinkaton trades the comfort of bulk in order to gain several matchups including the Ampharos 1v1, the Blastoise 1v1, the Cradily (Shadow) 0v1, 0v2, 1v2. Tinkaton would need 141.63 Atk while maintaining 166 HP.

Rank-1 Tinkaton (13/15/15) meets the General Good thresholds.

Simulation-Derived IV Tiers

Auto-derived from the sim (not expert-authored).

Threshold Tiers

Stat-target headlines from thresholds/*.toml, each grouped with the named anchors its spec clears and the IV spreads that meet it. Within each tier card, bullets are grouped by opponent and sorted by the required stat (Def or Atk) ascending - read top-to-bottom in the order a player would clear them as their stat grows. The flat list of every anchor (regardless of tier) lives in Anchor-Driven Matchup Flips below. New to tier cards? The Threshold Tiers guide walks through what the stat cutoffs and member counts mean. A tier's anchors come from two passes over the anchor list:

Primary bullets - the tier has a cutoff on the anchor's target axis (atk or def) that meets or exceeds the anchor's threshold. Consequences:
- Subset case: if tier A is strictly stricter than tier B on the anchor axis, A's bullet list is a superset of B's. Overlap is intentional.
- Crossed-cutoff case: tier A has only an atk cutoff, tier B has only a def cutoff - neither is a subset of the other. Atk anchors appear only on A; def anchors only on B.
- Slayer-axis IV-count case: two tiers can list the same atk anchor but have different member-IV counts because a stricter tier's def cutoff excludes def-sacrificing spreads that the looser tier keeps. Check the (−N vs parent) callout on the tier header to spot this at a glance.
Anchors we get for free (collapsed) - the tier has no cutoff on the anchor's target axis, but every IV in the tier clears the anchor's threshold anyway. These would be silently dropped by the primary filter; we surface them in a separate collapsed block so the card isn't misleading.

Dondozo Slayer · atk≥142.81, hp≥172 (108 IV spreads) (−133 vs Walrein Atk (atk-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 66 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Annihilape, Blastoise, +25 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Dondozo (1 scenario flip).

139.88 Atk for Tinkaton (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v2)
140.65 Atk for Tinkaton (Bulldoze) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v2)
133.73 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
134.59 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
140.20 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Fairy Wind) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
131.09 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Bulldoze) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0, 2v2)
131.65 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Gigaton Hammer) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0, 2v2)
142.24 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Fairy Wind) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (2v2 no bait)
131.61 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Gigaton Hammer) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1)
138.31 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Bulldoze) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1)
140.70 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Fairy Wind) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1)
132.92 Atk for Jellicent (Gigaton Hammer) vs Jellicent (2v1)
134.49 Atk for Jellicent (Bulldoze) vs Jellicent (2v1)
132.56 Atk for Giratina Altered (Bulldoze) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
132.65 Atk for Giratina Altered (Gigaton Hammer) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
134.72 Atk for Giratina Altered (Fairy Wind) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
132.17 Atk for Cramorant (Gigaton Hammer) vs Cramorant (1v0)
132.55 Atk for Cramorant (Bulldoze) vs Cramorant (1v0)
131.52 Atk for Lapras (Gigaton Hammer) vs Lapras (0v0)
135.43 Atk for Lapras (Bulldoze) vs Lapras (0v0)
131.57 Atk for Dusknoir (Gigaton Hammer) vs Dusknoir (0v0, 2v2)
132.56 Atk for Dusknoir (Bulldoze) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
142.54 Atk for Dusknoir (Fairy Wind) vs Dusknoir (2v2 with bait)
140.23 Atk for Registeel (Bulldoze) vs Registeel (2v2)
141.91 Atk for Registeel (Gigaton Hammer) vs Registeel (2v2)
135.40 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1)
135.94 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1)
136.15 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Fairy Wind) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1)
130.78 Atk for Cresselia (Gigaton Hammer) vs Cresselia (0v2)
131.50 Atk for Cresselia (Bulldoze) vs Cresselia (0v2)
132.83 Atk for Cresselia (Fairy Wind) vs Cresselia (0v2)
131.53 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Forretress (1v0, 2v0)
131.90 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Forretress (1v0, 2v0)
142.08 Atk for Walrein (Fairy Wind) vs Walrein (0v0)
142.08 Atk for Walrein (Bulldoze) vs Walrein (0v0)
142.80 Atk for Walrein (Gigaton Hammer) vs Walrein (0v0)
137.84 Atk for Runerigus (Gigaton Hammer) vs Runerigus (2v2 with bait)
138.75 Atk for Seaking (Bulldoze) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
139.62 Atk for Seaking (Gigaton Hammer) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
131.85 Atk for Primarina (Bulldoze) vs Primarina (1v1)
132.29 Atk for Primarina (Gigaton Hammer) vs Primarina (1v1)
130.50 Atk for Ampharos (Gigaton Hammer) vs Ampharos (1v1, 2v2)
130.88 Atk for Ampharos (Bulldoze) vs Ampharos (1v1, 2v2)
132.54 Atk for Ampharos (Fairy Wind) vs Ampharos (2v2)
135.09 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
135.31 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
140.72 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Fairy Wind) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
130.50 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1, 1v1)
131.16 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1, 1v1)
133.11 Atk for Annihilape (Bulldoze) vs Annihilape (0v1, 1v1)
133.85 Atk for Annihilape (Gigaton Hammer) vs Annihilape (0v1, 1v1)
135.94 Atk for Annihilape (Fairy Wind) vs Annihilape (0v1, 1v1)
142.81 Atk for Dondozo (Bulldoze) vs Dondozo (2v2 no bait)
131.78 Atk for Blastoise (Gigaton Hammer) vs Blastoise (1v1)
132.67 Atk for Blastoise (Bulldoze) vs Blastoise (1v1)
136.48 Atk for Miltank (Bulldoze) vs Miltank (2v2 no bait)
136.57 Atk for Miltank (Gigaton Hammer) vs Miltank (2v2 no bait)
130.78 Atk for Corviknight (Bulldoze) vs Corviknight (2v0)
131.45 Atk for Corviknight (Gigaton Hammer) vs Corviknight (2v0)
131.32 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
133.16 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
131.31 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
130.51 Atk for Clefable (Gigaton Hammer) vs Clefable (0v1)
132.46 Atk for Seismitoad (Bulldoze) vs Seismitoad (1v0)
133.77 Atk for Seismitoad (Gigaton Hammer) vs Seismitoad (1v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

131.09 Atk + 172 HP flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v2) [2160 IVs]
131.93 Atk + 169 HP flips Shadow Milotic (0v0) [2688 IVs]
133.61 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v1 with bait) [3072 IVs]
131.09 Atk + 170 HP flips Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait) [2640 IVs]
131.09 Atk + 172 HP flips Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 no bait) [2160 IVs]
131.93 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v1 no bait) [3584 IVs]
140.75 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v2 no bait) [768 IVs]
131.09 Atk + 170 HP flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v2) [2640 IVs]
131.09 Atk + 171 HP flips Shadow Lapras (0v0) [2400 IVs]
133.61 Atk + 171 HP flips Shadow Milotic (0v0) [1920 IVs]
136.97 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v1) [2048 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v2)

Member IVs (108)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/9/13 👑	142.85	172.26	177	#74	-6	-12.8	-2.6	+1.1
15/10/12 👑	142.85	173.10	176	#78	-6	-12.5	-3.3	+1.2
15/8/14 👑	142.85	171.42	178	#90	-7	-14.5	-1.7	+0.9
15/11/11 👑	142.85	173.94	175	#96	-6	-13.3	-4.3	+0.5
15/10/11	142.85	173.10	175	#102	-9	-13.7	-4.5	+0.2
15/9/12	142.85	172.26	176	#105	-7	-15.7	-3.7	+0.1
15/15/7 👑	142.85	177.30	172	#107	-6	-12.9	-5.4	+0.3
15/14/8 👑	142.85	176.46	173	#115	-8	-13.7	-4.9	-0.4
15/12/10 👑	142.85	174.78	174	#137	-8	-14.8	-4.9	-0.3
15/13/8	142.85	175.62	173	#146	-8	-17.9	-5.1	-0.8
15/13/9	142.85	175.62	173	#147	-8	-17.9	-5.1	-0.8
15/11/10	142.85	173.94	174	#152	-9	-15.4	-5.2	-0.7
15/8/13	142.85	171.42	177	#154	-9	-15.7	-6.3	-0.7
15/7/14	142.85	170.58	178	#157	-10	-15.7	-6.9	-0.7
15/7/15	142.85	170.58	178	#158	-10	-15.7	-6.9	-0.7
15/14/7	142.85	176.46	172	#160	-9	-15.5	-6.4	-1.6
15/10/10	142.85	173.10	174	#167	-10	-16.0	-6.3	-1.0
15/9/11	142.85	172.26	175	#188	-11	-22.5	-4.7	-1.0
15/13/7	142.85	175.62	172	#189	-9	-19.2	-6.1	-2.1
15/12/8	142.85	174.78	173	#197	-11	-21.2	-5.7	-1.4
15/12/9	142.85	174.78	173	#198	-11	-21.2	-5.7	-1.4
15/8/12	142.85	171.42	176	#201	-11	-18.6	-7.2	-2.0
15/6/14	142.85	169.74	178	#208	-13	-19.4	-8.0	-1.3
15/6/15	142.85	169.74	178	#209	-13	-19.4	-8.0	-1.3
15/11/8	142.85	173.94	173	#210	-11	-21.9	-6.0	-1.9
15/11/9	142.85	173.94	173	#211	-11	-21.9	-6.0	-1.9
15/7/13	142.85	170.58	177	#214	-12	-17.1	-7.9	-2.1
15/9/10	142.85	172.26	174	#240	-12	-24.2	-6.4	-2.4
15/10/8	142.85	173.10	173	#259	-13	-24.0	-6.3	-2.1
15/10/9	142.85	173.10	173	#260	-13	-24.0	-6.3	-2.1
15/7/12	142.85	170.58	176	#279	-15	-20.2	-9.0	-3.4
15/12/7	142.85	174.78	172	#284	-13	-24.2	-6.6	-2.7
15/8/11	142.85	171.42	175	#290	-14	-25.3	-8.3	-3.1
15/6/13	142.85	169.74	177	#299	-16	-26.9	-9.0	-2.5
15/11/7	142.85	173.94	172	#317	-14	-26.9	-7.1	-3.0
15/9/8	142.85	172.26	173	#327	-14	-27.0	-7.6	-3.5
15/9/9	142.85	172.26	173	#328	-14	-27.0	-7.6	-3.5
15/10/7	142.85	173.10	172	#340	-15	-29.7	-7.3	-3.3
15/6/12	142.85	169.74	176	#350	-17	-28.5	-9.9	-3.8
15/8/10	142.85	171.42	174	#361	-16	-28.7	-9.3	-4.6
15/7/11	142.85	170.58	175	#366	-17	-28.3	-9.9	-4.7
15/5/14	142.85	168.90	178	#395	-18	-22.9	-13.1	-10.6
15/5/15	142.85	168.90	178	#396	-18	-22.9	-13.1	-10.6
15/6/11	142.85	169.74	175	#423	-19	-31.1	-10.8	-5.1
15/4/14	142.85	168.06	178	#430	-20	-24.1	-13.5	-11.0
15/4/15	142.85	168.06	178	#431	-20	-24.1	-13.5	-11.0
15/9/7	142.85	172.26	172	#432	-19	-32.9	-8.6	-13.1
15/8/8	142.85	171.42	173	#437	-18	-29.8	-9.8	-6.4
15/8/9	142.85	171.42	173	#438	-18	-29.8	-9.8	-6.4
15/7/10	142.85	170.58	174	#482	-19	-32.3	-11.0	-6.4
… 58 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Walrein Atk · atk≥142.08 (241 IV spreads) (−250 vs Tinkaton Mirror Atk (atk-sacrificing spreads excluded))

Clears 61 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Annihilape, Blastoise, +24 more. Atk breakpoint(s) vs Walrein (3 scenario flips).

139.88 Atk for Tinkaton (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v2)
140.65 Atk for Tinkaton (Bulldoze) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v2)
133.73 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
134.59 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
140.20 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Fairy Wind) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
131.09 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Bulldoze) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0, 2v2)
131.65 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Gigaton Hammer) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0, 2v2)
131.61 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Gigaton Hammer) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1)
138.31 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Bulldoze) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1)
140.70 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Fairy Wind) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1)
132.92 Atk for Jellicent (Gigaton Hammer) vs Jellicent (2v1)
134.49 Atk for Jellicent (Bulldoze) vs Jellicent (2v1)
132.56 Atk for Giratina Altered (Bulldoze) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
132.65 Atk for Giratina Altered (Gigaton Hammer) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
134.72 Atk for Giratina Altered (Fairy Wind) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
132.17 Atk for Cramorant (Gigaton Hammer) vs Cramorant (1v0)
132.55 Atk for Cramorant (Bulldoze) vs Cramorant (1v0)
131.52 Atk for Lapras (Gigaton Hammer) vs Lapras (0v0)
135.43 Atk for Lapras (Bulldoze) vs Lapras (0v0)
131.57 Atk for Dusknoir (Gigaton Hammer) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
132.56 Atk for Dusknoir (Bulldoze) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
140.23 Atk for Registeel (Bulldoze) vs Registeel (2v2)
141.91 Atk for Registeel (Gigaton Hammer) vs Registeel (2v2)
135.40 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1)
135.94 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1)
136.15 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Fairy Wind) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1)
130.78 Atk for Cresselia (Gigaton Hammer) vs Cresselia (0v2)
131.50 Atk for Cresselia (Bulldoze) vs Cresselia (0v2)
132.83 Atk for Cresselia (Fairy Wind) vs Cresselia (0v2)
131.53 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Forretress (1v0, 2v0)
131.90 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Forretress (1v0, 2v0)
142.08 Atk for Walrein (Fairy Wind) vs Walrein (0v0)
137.84 Atk for Runerigus (Gigaton Hammer) vs Runerigus (2v2 with bait)
138.75 Atk for Seaking (Bulldoze) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
139.62 Atk for Seaking (Gigaton Hammer) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
131.85 Atk for Primarina (Bulldoze) vs Primarina (1v1)
132.29 Atk for Primarina (Gigaton Hammer) vs Primarina (1v1)
130.50 Atk for Ampharos (Gigaton Hammer) vs Ampharos (1v1, 2v2)
130.88 Atk for Ampharos (Bulldoze) vs Ampharos (2v2)
132.54 Atk for Ampharos (Fairy Wind) vs Ampharos (2v2)
135.09 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
135.31 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
140.72 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Fairy Wind) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
130.50 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1, 1v1)
131.16 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1, 1v1)
133.11 Atk for Annihilape (Bulldoze) vs Annihilape (0v1, 1v1)
133.85 Atk for Annihilape (Gigaton Hammer) vs Annihilape (0v1, 1v1)
135.94 Atk for Annihilape (Fairy Wind) vs Annihilape (0v1, 1v1)
131.78 Atk for Blastoise (Gigaton Hammer) vs Blastoise (1v1)
132.67 Atk for Blastoise (Bulldoze) vs Blastoise (1v1)
136.48 Atk for Miltank (Bulldoze) vs Miltank (2v2 no bait)
136.57 Atk for Miltank (Gigaton Hammer) vs Miltank (2v2 no bait)
130.78 Atk for Corviknight (Bulldoze) vs Corviknight (2v0)
131.45 Atk for Corviknight (Gigaton Hammer) vs Corviknight (2v0)
131.32 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
133.16 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
131.31 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
130.51 Atk for Clefable (Gigaton Hammer) vs Clefable (0v1)
132.46 Atk for Seismitoad (Bulldoze) vs Seismitoad (1v0)
133.77 Atk for Seismitoad (Gigaton Hammer) vs Seismitoad (1v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

133.61 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v1 with bait) [3072 IVs]
131.93 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v1 no bait) [3584 IVs]
140.75 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v2 no bait) [768 IVs]
136.97 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v1) [2048 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v2)

Member IVs (241)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
15/10/15 👑	142.43	172.59	178	#40	-5	-5.5	-1.6	+0.4
15/11/14 👑	142.43	173.42	177	#45	-5	-4.4	-5.3	-0.3
15/12/13 👑	142.43	174.26	176	#70	-5	-4.6	-5.6	-1.6
15/9/13 👑	142.85	172.26	177	#74	-6	-12.8	-2.6	+1.1
15/10/12 👑	142.85	173.10	176	#78	-6	-12.5	-3.3	+1.2
15/14/11 👑	142.43	175.94	175	#80	-6	-4.8	-6.3	-1.6
15/9/15	142.43	171.75	178	#81	-6	-6.5	-4.9	-0.4
15/15/10 👑	142.43	176.78	174	#83	-6	-4.9	-7.1	-1.7
15/8/14 👑	142.85	171.42	178	#90	-7	-14.5	-1.7	+0.9
15/13/11	142.43	175.10	175	#91	-6	-3.2	-6.9	-2.1
15/13/12	142.43	175.10	175	#92	-6	-3.2	-6.9	-2.1
15/10/14	142.43	172.59	177	#94	-7	-7.1	-6.0	-2.1
15/11/11 👑	142.85	173.94	175	#96	-6	-13.3	-4.3	+0.5
15/11/13	142.43	173.42	176	#97	-7	-7.0	-6.7	-1.9
15/10/11	142.85	173.10	175	#102	-9	-13.7	-4.5	+0.2
15/12/11	142.43	174.26	175	#103	-6	-6.1	-7.4	-2.4
15/12/12	142.43	174.26	175	#104	-6	-6.1	-7.4	-2.4
15/9/12	142.85	172.26	176	#105	-7	-15.7	-3.7	+0.1
15/15/7 👑	142.85	177.30	172	#107	-6	-12.9	-5.4	+0.3
15/15/9	142.43	176.78	173	#114	-7	-6.4	-8.2	-2.8
15/14/8 👑	142.85	176.46	173	#115	-8	-13.7	-4.9	-0.4
15/14/10	142.43	175.94	174	#117	-7	-7.4	-7.5	-2.7
15/11/12	142.43	173.42	175	#124	-9	-8.3	-7.9	-2.8
15/10/13	142.43	172.59	176	#131	-8	-10.1	-7.1	-3.1
15/12/10 👑	142.85	174.78	174	#137	-8	-14.8	-4.9	-0.3
15/9/14	142.43	171.75	177	#139	-8	-7.9	-9.3	-3.0
15/13/8	142.85	175.62	173	#146	-8	-17.9	-5.1	-0.8
15/13/9	142.85	175.62	173	#147	-8	-17.9	-5.1	-0.8
15/13/10	142.43	175.10	174	#148	-8	-6.6	-8.1	-3.2
15/11/10	142.85	173.94	174	#152	-9	-15.4	-5.2	-0.7
15/8/13	142.85	171.42	177	#154	-9	-15.7	-6.3	-0.7
15/7/14	142.85	170.58	178	#157	-10	-15.7	-6.9	-0.7
15/7/15	142.85	170.58	178	#158	-10	-15.7	-6.9	-0.7
15/15/8	142.43	176.78	172	#159	-9	-8.2	-9.8	-4.0
15/14/7	142.85	176.46	172	#160	-9	-15.5	-6.4	-1.6
15/8/15	142.43	170.91	178	#161	-10	-9.6	-9.5	-3.0
15/15/6	142.85	177.30	171	#165	-9	-19.7	-5.6	-0.8
15/10/10	142.85	173.10	174	#167	-10	-16.0	-6.3	-1.0
15/14/9	142.43	175.94	173	#176	-9	-14.5	-8.4	-3.7
15/9/11	142.85	172.26	175	#188	-11	-22.5	-4.7	-1.0
15/13/7	142.85	175.62	172	#189	-9	-19.2	-6.1	-2.1
15/12/8	142.85	174.78	173	#197	-11	-21.2	-5.7	-1.4
15/12/9	142.85	174.78	173	#198	-11	-21.2	-5.7	-1.4
15/8/12	142.85	171.42	176	#201	-11	-18.6	-7.2	-2.0
15/6/14	142.85	169.74	178	#208	-13	-19.4	-8.0	-1.3
15/6/15	142.85	169.74	178	#209	-13	-19.4	-8.0	-1.3
15/11/8	142.85	173.94	173	#210	-11	-21.9	-6.0	-1.9
15/11/9	142.85	173.94	173	#211	-11	-21.9	-6.0	-1.9
15/7/13	142.85	170.58	177	#214	-12	-17.1	-7.9	-2.1
15/9/10	142.85	172.26	174	#240	-12	-24.2	-6.4	-2.4
… 191 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Fortified Ampharos · def≥176.69, hp≥174 (88 IV spreads) (−415 vs Cradily (Shadow) Bulk (def-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 131 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Corviknight, Shadow Cradily, Shadow Cresselia, +24 more. Bulkpoint(s) vs Ampharos (1 scenario flip).

166.82 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Air Cutter) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
167.97 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Payback) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
167.97 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Sky Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
168.70 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
172.01 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Sand Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
164.85 Def + 171 HP for Virizion (Stone Edge) vs Virizion (0v0)
165.13 Def + 170 HP for Virizion (Close Combat) vs Virizion (0v0)
166.16 Def + 173 HP for Virizion (Leaf Blade) vs Virizion (0v0)
166.74 Def + 170 HP for Virizion (Sacred Sword) vs Virizion (0v0)
164.73 Def + 170 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
166.78 Def + 170 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
166.78 Def + 171 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
174.35 Def + 172 HP for Mimikyu (Hex) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
165.29 Def for Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
166.29 Def for Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
166.52 Def for Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
166.71 Def for Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
167.03 Def for Snorlax (Superpower) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
169.49 Def for Snorlax (Psywave) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
169.49 Def for Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
165.62 Def + 175 HP for Jellicent (Shadow Ball) vs Jellicent (1v0)
165.62 Def + 175 HP for Jellicent (Surf) vs Jellicent (1v0)
166.95 Def + 176 HP for Jellicent (Ice Beam) vs Jellicent (1v0)
167.29 Def + 176 HP for Jellicent (Bubble Beam) vs Jellicent (1v0)
176.66 Def + 175 HP for Jellicent (Bubble) vs Jellicent (1v0)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 169 HP for Rillaboom (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.01 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
166.26 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Lapras (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
166.36 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
166.49 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
167.21 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
167.96 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
165.56 Def + 174 HP for Dondozo (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.14 Def + 174 HP for Dondozo (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.64 Def + 174 HP for Dondozo (Surf) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.93 Def + 176 HP for Dondozo (Outrage) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.28 Def + 169 HP for Registeel (Hyper Beam) vs Registeel (0v0)
166.28 Def + 169 HP for Registeel (Zap Cannon) vs Registeel (0v0, 1v1)
166.28 Def + 169 HP for Registeel (Focus Blast) vs Registeel (0v0, 1v1)
167.23 Def + 168 HP for Registeel (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (0v0, 1v1)
173.59 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Flame Charge) vs Talonflame (1v0)
173.87 Def + 176 HP for Talonflame (Fly) vs Talonflame (1v0)
174.17 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Incinerate) vs Talonflame (1v0)
174.17 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Fire Blast) vs Talonflame (1v0)
175.37 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Talonflame (1v0)
175.65 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Hurricane) vs Talonflame (1v0)
166.49 Def + 174 HP for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (0v0)
168.03 Def + 174 HP for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (0v0)
168.21 Def + 174 HP for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (0v0)
171.11 Def + 176 HP for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (0v0)
164.98 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
164.98 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
165.41 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
165.41 Def for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
166.35 Def for Shadow Walrein (Waterfall) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
170.13 Def for Shadow Walrein (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
168.66 Def + 177 HP for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 2v2)
169.32 Def + 177 HP for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 2v2)
169.32 Def for Deoxys Defense (Counter) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
169.32 Def for Deoxys Defense (Low Kick) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
169.32 Def for Deoxys Defense (Zen Headbutt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
172.54 Def + 178 HP for Deoxys Defense (Rock Slide) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1)
168.73 Def + 170 HP for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (0v0)
170.57 Def + 170 HP for Runerigus (Sand Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v0)
171.54 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Astonish) vs Runerigus (0v0)
171.54 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Shadow Claw) vs Runerigus (0v0)
171.81 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v0)
172.42 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Brutal Swing) vs Runerigus (0v0)
166.04 Def + 169 HP for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (0v0)
166.04 Def + 170 HP for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (0v0)
166.78 Def + 173 HP for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (0v0)
169.20 Def + 174 HP for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (0v0)
171.23 Def + 173 HP for Seaking (Waterfall) vs Seaking (0v0)
171.51 Def + 173 HP for Seaking (Megahorn) vs Seaking (0v0)
166.96 Def + 173 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
167.19 Def + 175 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
167.19 Def + 175 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
169.85 Def + 173 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
169.05 Def + 169 HP for Toucannon (Flash Cannon) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
169.81 Def + 167 HP for Toucannon (Beak Blast) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
171.52 Def + 168 HP for Toucannon (Rock Blast) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
172.89 Def for Toucannon (Rock Smash) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
172.89 Def for Toucannon (Peck) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
172.89 Def for Toucannon (Drill Peck) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
165.90 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
166.10 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Waterfall) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
166.10 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Aqua Tail) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
167.09 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Surf) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
164.80 Def + 171 HP for Primarina (Charm) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Hydro Pump) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Disarming Voice) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Moonblast) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Hydro Cannon) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Sparkling Aria) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
166.12 Def + 171 HP for Primarina (Psychic) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
175.91 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (0v2)
175.91 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (0v2)
175.91 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (0v2)
164.88 Def + 171 HP for Seismitoad (Earth Power) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
166.98 Def + 174 HP for Seismitoad (Sludge Bomb) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
168.32 Def + 173 HP for Seismitoad (Muddy Water) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
170.78 Def + 174 HP for Seismitoad (Icy Wind) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
165.69 Def + 170 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
166.16 Def + 170 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
166.16 Def + 170 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
166.76 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
168.80 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
164.87 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
165.42 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
166.16 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
166.16 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
166.16 Def + 171 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
166.76 Def + 171 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
165.49 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.00 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.00 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.00 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.75 Def + 171 HP for Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
167.51 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Ancient Power) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v2 with bait)
167.51 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v2 with bait)
167.80 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v2 with bait)
166.77 Def + 168 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (0v2, 1v2)
167.14 Def + 171 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (1v2 no bait)
167.58 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (0v2, 1v2)
167.58 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (0v2, 1v2)
176.61 Def + 174 HP for Shadow Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (2v1)
176.69 Def + 178 HP for Ampharos (Power Gem) vs Ampharos (1v1)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

165.54 Def + 171 HP flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v2) [2400 IVs]
165.54 Def + 170 HP flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v2) [2640 IVs]
173.42 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v0) [1279 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v0)

Member IVs (88)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/15/15 👑	140.75	176.78	178	#1	+1	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
13/15/14	140.75	176.78	177	#3	+0	-1.4	-1.3	-0.0
13/15/12 👑	141.17	177.30	176	#5	-1	-2.4	-1.0	+1.1
12/15/14 👑	140.33	177.30	178	#15	+0	-5.3	-4.7	-3.3
12/15/15 👑	140.33	177.30	178	#16	+0	-5.3	-4.7	-3.3
13/15/11	141.17	177.30	175	#32	-4	-3.7	-6.5	-0.9
12/15/13	140.33	177.30	177	#35	-4	-6.6	-5.7	-4.4
13/15/13	140.75	176.78	176	#37	-3	-4.4	-1.0	-1.2
12/15/12	140.33	177.30	176	#50	-6	-9.0	-6.3	-4.4
14/15/11 👑	141.59	176.78	175	#61	-5	-4.3	-7.3	-1.7
14/15/12 👑	141.59	176.78	175	#62	-5	-4.3	-7.3	-1.7
11/15/14	139.49	177.30	178	#67	-7	-12.7	-10.3	-13.8
11/15/15	139.49	177.30	178	#68	-7	-12.7	-10.3	-13.8
15/15/10 👑	142.43	176.78	174	#83	-6	-4.9	-7.1	-1.7
14/15/10 👑	142.01	177.30	174	#86	-6	-5.8	-7.0	-1.0
10/15/14	138.65	177.30	178	#87	+0	-12.0	-11.9	-15.9
10/15/15	138.65	177.30	178	#88	+0	-12.0	-11.9	-15.9
11/15/13	139.49	177.30	177	#95	-11	-14.0	-11.3	-14.8
12/15/11	140.33	177.30	175	#106	-9	-10.3	-11.8	-6.5
13/15/10	141.17	177.30	174	#109	-8	-7.3	-7.7	-2.0
10/15/13	138.65	177.30	177	#122	+0	-13.3	-12.9	-16.9
9/15/14	137.81	177.30	178	#127	+0	-14.9	-13.3	-18.0
9/15/15	137.81	177.30	178	#128	+0	-14.9	-13.3	-18.0
11/15/12	139.49	177.30	176	#156	-14	-16.4	-11.9	-14.8
9/15/13	137.81	177.30	177	#170	+0	-16.2	-14.3	-19.0
8/15/14	136.97	177.30	178	#186	+0	-15.9	-14.3	-19.9
8/15/15	136.97	177.30	178	#187	+0	-15.9	-14.3	-19.9
10/15/12	138.65	177.30	176	#193	+0	-15.8	-13.5	-16.9
12/15/10	140.33	177.30	174	#224	-13	-13.2	-13.0	-7.6
8/15/13	136.97	177.30	177	#226	+0	-17.3	-15.3	-20.9
11/15/11	139.49	177.30	175	#231	-16	-17.7	-17.2	-17.1
9/15/12	137.81	177.30	176	#247	+0	-18.8	-15.0	-19.0
7/15/14	136.13	177.30	178	#262	+0	-18.3	-15.3	-20.1
7/15/15	136.13	177.30	178	#263	+0	-18.3	-15.3	-20.1
10/15/11	138.65	177.30	175	#275	+0	-17.0	-21.0	-19.2
8/15/12	136.97	177.30	176	#303	+0	-19.8	-15.9	-20.9
7/15/13	136.13	177.30	177	#315	+0	-19.6	-16.3	-21.1
9/15/11	137.81	177.30	175	#338	+0	-20.1	-22.5	-21.3
11/15/10	139.49	177.30	174	#342	-19	-13.9	-18.4	-18.3
10/15/10	138.65	177.30	174	#369	+0	-13.2	-22.2	-20.3
8/15/11	136.97	177.30	175	#370	+0	-21.1	-20.6	-23.3
6/15/14	135.29	177.30	178	#390	+0	-20.8	-24.2	-21.6
6/15/15	135.29	177.30	178	#391	+0	-20.8	-24.2	-21.6
7/15/12	136.13	177.30	176	#399	+0	-22.2	-18.6	-21.1
9/15/10	137.81	177.30	174	#436	+0	-16.2	-23.7	-22.5
5/15/14	134.45	177.30	178	#450	+0	-21.8	-25.1	-24.6
5/15/15	134.45	177.30	178	#451	+0	-21.8	-25.1	-24.6
6/15/13	135.29	177.30	177	#452	+0	-22.1	-25.2	-22.6
7/15/11	136.13	177.30	175	#498	+0	-23.4	-23.3	-23.5
5/15/13	134.45	177.30	177	#511	+0	-23.1	-26.0	-25.7
… 38 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Fortified Forretress (Shadow) · def≥176.61, hp≥174 (88 IV spreads) (−415 vs Cradily (Shadow) Bulk (def-sacrificing / hp-low spreads excluded))

Clears 129 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Shadow Corviknight, Shadow Cradily, Shadow Cresselia, Deoxys (Defense), +23 more. Bulkpoint(s) vs Forretress (Shadow) (1 scenario flip).

166.82 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Air Cutter) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
167.97 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Payback) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
167.97 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Sky Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
168.70 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
172.01 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Sand Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
164.85 Def + 171 HP for Virizion (Stone Edge) vs Virizion (0v0)
165.13 Def + 170 HP for Virizion (Close Combat) vs Virizion (0v0)
166.16 Def + 173 HP for Virizion (Leaf Blade) vs Virizion (0v0)
166.74 Def + 170 HP for Virizion (Sacred Sword) vs Virizion (0v0)
164.73 Def + 170 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
166.78 Def + 170 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
166.78 Def + 171 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
174.35 Def + 172 HP for Mimikyu (Hex) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
165.29 Def for Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
166.29 Def for Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
166.52 Def for Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
166.71 Def for Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
167.03 Def for Snorlax (Superpower) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
169.49 Def for Snorlax (Psywave) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
169.49 Def for Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
165.62 Def + 175 HP for Jellicent (Shadow Ball) vs Jellicent (1v0)
165.62 Def + 175 HP for Jellicent (Surf) vs Jellicent (1v0)
166.95 Def + 176 HP for Jellicent (Ice Beam) vs Jellicent (1v0)
167.29 Def + 176 HP for Jellicent (Bubble Beam) vs Jellicent (1v0)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 169 HP for Rillaboom (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.01 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
166.26 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Lapras (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
166.36 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
166.49 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
167.21 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
167.96 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
165.56 Def + 174 HP for Dondozo (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.14 Def + 174 HP for Dondozo (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.64 Def + 174 HP for Dondozo (Surf) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.93 Def + 176 HP for Dondozo (Outrage) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.28 Def + 169 HP for Registeel (Hyper Beam) vs Registeel (0v0)
166.28 Def + 169 HP for Registeel (Zap Cannon) vs Registeel (0v0, 1v1)
166.28 Def + 169 HP for Registeel (Focus Blast) vs Registeel (0v0, 1v1)
167.23 Def + 168 HP for Registeel (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (0v0, 1v1)
173.59 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Flame Charge) vs Talonflame (1v0)
173.87 Def + 176 HP for Talonflame (Fly) vs Talonflame (1v0)
174.17 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Incinerate) vs Talonflame (1v0)
174.17 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Fire Blast) vs Talonflame (1v0)
175.37 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Talonflame (1v0)
175.65 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Hurricane) vs Talonflame (1v0)
166.49 Def + 174 HP for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (0v0)
168.03 Def + 174 HP for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (0v0)
168.21 Def + 174 HP for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (0v0)
171.11 Def + 176 HP for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (0v0)
164.98 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
164.98 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
165.41 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
165.41 Def for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
166.35 Def for Shadow Walrein (Waterfall) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
170.13 Def for Shadow Walrein (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
168.66 Def + 177 HP for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 2v2)
169.32 Def + 177 HP for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 2v2)
169.32 Def for Deoxys Defense (Counter) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
169.32 Def for Deoxys Defense (Low Kick) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
169.32 Def for Deoxys Defense (Zen Headbutt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
172.54 Def + 178 HP for Deoxys Defense (Rock Slide) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1)
168.73 Def + 170 HP for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (0v0)
170.57 Def + 170 HP for Runerigus (Sand Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v0)
171.54 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Astonish) vs Runerigus (0v0)
171.54 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Shadow Claw) vs Runerigus (0v0)
171.81 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v0)
172.42 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Brutal Swing) vs Runerigus (0v0)
166.04 Def + 169 HP for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (0v0)
166.04 Def + 170 HP for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (0v0)
166.78 Def + 173 HP for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (0v0)
169.20 Def + 174 HP for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (0v0)
171.23 Def + 173 HP for Seaking (Waterfall) vs Seaking (0v0)
171.51 Def + 173 HP for Seaking (Megahorn) vs Seaking (0v0)
166.96 Def + 173 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
167.19 Def + 175 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
167.19 Def + 175 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
169.85 Def + 173 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
169.05 Def + 169 HP for Toucannon (Flash Cannon) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
169.81 Def + 167 HP for Toucannon (Beak Blast) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
171.52 Def + 168 HP for Toucannon (Rock Blast) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
172.89 Def for Toucannon (Rock Smash) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
172.89 Def for Toucannon (Peck) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
172.89 Def for Toucannon (Drill Peck) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
165.90 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
166.10 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Waterfall) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
166.10 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Aqua Tail) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
167.09 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Surf) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
164.80 Def + 171 HP for Primarina (Charm) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Hydro Pump) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Disarming Voice) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Moonblast) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Hydro Cannon) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Sparkling Aria) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
166.12 Def + 171 HP for Primarina (Psychic) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
175.91 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (0v2)
175.91 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (0v2)
175.91 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (0v2)
164.88 Def + 173 HP for Seismitoad (Earth Power) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
166.98 Def + 174 HP for Seismitoad (Sludge Bomb) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
168.32 Def + 173 HP for Seismitoad (Muddy Water) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
170.78 Def + 174 HP for Seismitoad (Icy Wind) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
165.69 Def + 170 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
166.16 Def + 170 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
166.16 Def + 170 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
166.76 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
168.80 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
164.87 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
165.42 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
166.16 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
166.16 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
166.16 Def + 171 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
166.76 Def + 171 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
165.49 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.00 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.00 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.00 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.75 Def + 171 HP for Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
167.51 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Ancient Power) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v2 with bait)
167.51 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v2 with bait)
167.80 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v2 with bait)
166.77 Def + 168 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (0v2, 1v2)
167.14 Def + 171 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (1v2 no bait)
167.58 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (0v2, 1v2)
167.58 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (0v2, 1v2)
176.61 Def + 174 HP for Shadow Forretress (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Forretress (2v1)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

165.54 Def + 171 HP flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v2) [2400 IVs]
165.54 Def + 170 HP flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (2v2) [2640 IVs]
173.42 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v0) [1279 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v0)

Member IVs (88)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/15/15 👑	140.75	176.78	178	#1	+1	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
13/15/14	140.75	176.78	177	#3	+0	-1.4	-1.3	-0.0
13/15/12 👑	141.17	177.30	176	#5	-1	-2.4	-1.0	+1.1
12/15/14 👑	140.33	177.30	178	#15	+0	-5.3	-4.7	-3.3
12/15/15 👑	140.33	177.30	178	#16	+0	-5.3	-4.7	-3.3
13/15/11	141.17	177.30	175	#32	-4	-3.7	-6.5	-0.9
12/15/13	140.33	177.30	177	#35	-4	-6.6	-5.7	-4.4
13/15/13	140.75	176.78	176	#37	-3	-4.4	-1.0	-1.2
12/15/12	140.33	177.30	176	#50	-6	-9.0	-6.3	-4.4
14/15/11 👑	141.59	176.78	175	#61	-5	-4.3	-7.3	-1.7
14/15/12 👑	141.59	176.78	175	#62	-5	-4.3	-7.3	-1.7
11/15/14	139.49	177.30	178	#67	-7	-12.7	-10.3	-13.8
11/15/15	139.49	177.30	178	#68	-7	-12.7	-10.3	-13.8
15/15/10 👑	142.43	176.78	174	#83	-6	-4.9	-7.1	-1.7
14/15/10 👑	142.01	177.30	174	#86	-6	-5.8	-7.0	-1.0
10/15/14	138.65	177.30	178	#87	+0	-12.0	-11.9	-15.9
10/15/15	138.65	177.30	178	#88	+0	-12.0	-11.9	-15.9
11/15/13	139.49	177.30	177	#95	-11	-14.0	-11.3	-14.8
12/15/11	140.33	177.30	175	#106	-9	-10.3	-11.8	-6.5
13/15/10	141.17	177.30	174	#109	-8	-7.3	-7.7	-2.0
10/15/13	138.65	177.30	177	#122	+0	-13.3	-12.9	-16.9
9/15/14	137.81	177.30	178	#127	+0	-14.9	-13.3	-18.0
9/15/15	137.81	177.30	178	#128	+0	-14.9	-13.3	-18.0
11/15/12	139.49	177.30	176	#156	-14	-16.4	-11.9	-14.8
9/15/13	137.81	177.30	177	#170	+0	-16.2	-14.3	-19.0
8/15/14	136.97	177.30	178	#186	+0	-15.9	-14.3	-19.9
8/15/15	136.97	177.30	178	#187	+0	-15.9	-14.3	-19.9
10/15/12	138.65	177.30	176	#193	+0	-15.8	-13.5	-16.9
12/15/10	140.33	177.30	174	#224	-13	-13.2	-13.0	-7.6
8/15/13	136.97	177.30	177	#226	+0	-17.3	-15.3	-20.9
11/15/11	139.49	177.30	175	#231	-16	-17.7	-17.2	-17.1
9/15/12	137.81	177.30	176	#247	+0	-18.8	-15.0	-19.0
7/15/14	136.13	177.30	178	#262	+0	-18.3	-15.3	-20.1
7/15/15	136.13	177.30	178	#263	+0	-18.3	-15.3	-20.1
10/15/11	138.65	177.30	175	#275	+0	-17.0	-21.0	-19.2
8/15/12	136.97	177.30	176	#303	+0	-19.8	-15.9	-20.9
7/15/13	136.13	177.30	177	#315	+0	-19.6	-16.3	-21.1
9/15/11	137.81	177.30	175	#338	+0	-20.1	-22.5	-21.3
11/15/10	139.49	177.30	174	#342	-19	-13.9	-18.4	-18.3
10/15/10	138.65	177.30	174	#369	+0	-13.2	-22.2	-20.3
8/15/11	136.97	177.30	175	#370	+0	-21.1	-20.6	-23.3
6/15/14	135.29	177.30	178	#390	+0	-20.8	-24.2	-21.6
6/15/15	135.29	177.30	178	#391	+0	-20.8	-24.2	-21.6
7/15/12	136.13	177.30	176	#399	+0	-22.2	-18.6	-21.1
9/15/10	137.81	177.30	174	#436	+0	-16.2	-23.7	-22.5
5/15/14	134.45	177.30	178	#450	+0	-21.8	-25.1	-24.6
5/15/15	134.45	177.30	178	#451	+0	-21.8	-25.1	-24.6
6/15/13	135.29	177.30	177	#452	+0	-22.1	-25.2	-22.6
7/15/11	136.13	177.30	175	#498	+0	-23.4	-23.3	-23.5
5/15/13	134.45	177.30	177	#511	+0	-23.1	-26.0	-25.7
… 38 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Cradily (Shadow) Bulk · def≥175.91 (503 IV spreads)

Clears 128 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Shadow Corviknight, Shadow Cradily, Shadow Cresselia, Deoxys (Defense), +22 more. Bulkpoint(s) vs Cradily (Shadow) (3 scenario flips).

166.82 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Air Cutter) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
167.97 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Payback) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
167.97 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Sky Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
168.70 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Iron Head) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
172.01 Def + 177 HP for Shadow Corviknight (Sand Attack) vs Shadow Corviknight (0v0, 1v0)
164.85 Def + 171 HP for Virizion (Stone Edge) vs Virizion (0v0)
165.13 Def + 170 HP for Virizion (Close Combat) vs Virizion (0v0)
166.16 Def + 173 HP for Virizion (Leaf Blade) vs Virizion (0v0)
166.74 Def + 170 HP for Virizion (Sacred Sword) vs Virizion (0v0)
164.73 Def + 170 HP for Mimikyu (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
166.78 Def + 172 HP for Mimikyu (Shadow Sneak) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
166.78 Def + 171 HP for Mimikyu (Play Rough) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
174.35 Def + 172 HP for Mimikyu (Hex) vs Mimikyu (0v0)
165.29 Def for Snorlax (Earthquake) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
166.29 Def for Snorlax (Skull Bash) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
166.52 Def for Snorlax (Heavy Slam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
166.71 Def for Snorlax (Hyper Beam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
167.03 Def for Snorlax (Superpower) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
169.49 Def for Snorlax (Psywave) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
169.49 Def for Snorlax (Body Slam) vs Snorlax (0v0, 1v1, 2v1, 2v2)
165.62 Def + 175 HP for Jellicent (Shadow Ball) vs Jellicent (1v0)
165.62 Def + 176 HP for Jellicent (Surf) vs Jellicent (1v0)
166.95 Def + 176 HP for Jellicent (Ice Beam) vs Jellicent (1v0)
167.29 Def + 176 HP for Jellicent (Bubble Beam) vs Jellicent (1v0)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Earth Power) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Frenzy Plant) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Energy Ball) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 170 HP for Rillaboom (Grass Knot) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.98 Def + 169 HP for Rillaboom (Drum Beating) vs Rillaboom (2v1, 2v2)
165.01 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Surf) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
166.26 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Lapras (Blizzard) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
166.36 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Hydro Pump) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
166.49 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Skull Bash) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
167.21 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Lapras (Sparkling Aria) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
167.96 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Lapras (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Lapras (0v0)
165.56 Def + 174 HP for Dondozo (Hydro Pump) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.14 Def + 174 HP for Dondozo (Liquidation) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.64 Def + 174 HP for Dondozo (Surf) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.93 Def + 176 HP for Dondozo (Outrage) vs Dondozo (0v0)
166.28 Def + 169 HP for Registeel (Hyper Beam) vs Registeel (0v0)
166.28 Def + 169 HP for Registeel (Zap Cannon) vs Registeel (0v0)
166.28 Def + 169 HP for Registeel (Focus Blast) vs Registeel (0v0)
167.23 Def + 168 HP for Registeel (Flash Cannon) vs Registeel (0v0, 1v1)
173.59 Def + 176 HP for Talonflame (Flame Charge) vs Talonflame (1v0)
173.87 Def + 176 HP for Talonflame (Fly) vs Talonflame (1v0)
174.17 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Incinerate) vs Talonflame (1v0)
174.17 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Fire Blast) vs Talonflame (1v0)
175.37 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Brave Bird) vs Talonflame (1v0)
175.65 Def + 175 HP for Talonflame (Hurricane) vs Talonflame (1v0)
166.49 Def + 174 HP for Walrein (Earthquake) vs Walrein (0v0)
168.03 Def + 174 HP for Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Walrein (0v0)
168.21 Def + 174 HP for Walrein (Blizzard) vs Walrein (0v0)
171.11 Def + 176 HP for Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Walrein (0v0)
164.98 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Walrein (Earthquake) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
164.98 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Walrein (Water Pulse) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
165.41 Def + 168 HP for Shadow Walrein (Blizzard) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
165.41 Def for Shadow Walrein (Icicle Spear) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
166.35 Def for Shadow Walrein (Waterfall) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
170.13 Def for Shadow Walrein (Powder Snow) vs Shadow Walrein (0v0)
168.66 Def + 177 HP for Deoxys Defense (Psycho Boost) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 2v2)
169.32 Def + 177 HP for Deoxys Defense (Thunderbolt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1, 2v2)
169.32 Def for Deoxys Defense (Counter) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
169.32 Def for Deoxys Defense (Low Kick) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
169.32 Def for Deoxys Defense (Zen Headbutt) vs Deoxys (Defense) (2v2)
172.54 Def + 178 HP for Deoxys Defense (Rock Slide) vs Deoxys (Defense) (0v1)
168.73 Def + 170 HP for Runerigus (Shadow Ball) vs Runerigus (0v0)
170.57 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Sand Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v0)
171.54 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Astonish) vs Runerigus (0v0)
171.54 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Shadow Claw) vs Runerigus (0v0)
171.81 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Rock Tomb) vs Runerigus (0v0)
172.42 Def + 171 HP for Runerigus (Brutal Swing) vs Runerigus (0v0)
166.04 Def + 171 HP for Seaking (Drill Run) vs Seaking (0v0)
166.04 Def + 170 HP for Seaking (Water Pulse) vs Seaking (0v0)
166.78 Def + 173 HP for Seaking (Ice Beam) vs Seaking (0v0)
169.20 Def + 174 HP for Seaking (Icy Wind) vs Seaking (0v0)
171.23 Def + 173 HP for Seaking (Waterfall) vs Seaking (0v0)
171.51 Def + 173 HP for Seaking (Megahorn) vs Seaking (0v0)
166.96 Def + 173 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Future Sight) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
167.19 Def + 175 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Moonblast) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
167.19 Def + 175 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
169.85 Def + 173 HP for Shadow Cresselia (Aurora Beam) vs Shadow Cresselia (0v2)
169.05 Def + 169 HP for Toucannon (Flash Cannon) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
169.81 Def + 167 HP for Toucannon (Beak Blast) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
171.52 Def + 168 HP for Toucannon (Rock Blast) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
172.89 Def for Toucannon (Rock Smash) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
172.89 Def for Toucannon (Peck) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
172.89 Def for Toucannon (Drill Peck) vs Toucannon (1v2 with bait)
165.90 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Hyper Beam) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
166.10 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Waterfall) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
166.10 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Aqua Tail) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
167.09 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Milotic (Surf) vs Shadow Milotic (0v0)
164.80 Def + 171 HP for Primarina (Charm) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Hydro Pump) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Disarming Voice) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Moonblast) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Hydro Cannon) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
164.80 Def + 170 HP for Primarina (Sparkling Aria) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
166.12 Def + 171 HP for Primarina (Psychic) vs Primarina (2v2 with bait)
175.91 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Cradily (Grass Knot) vs Shadow Cradily (0v2)
175.91 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Slide) vs Shadow Cradily (0v2)
175.91 Def + 176 HP for Shadow Cradily (Rock Tomb) vs Shadow Cradily (0v2)
164.88 Def + 173 HP for Seismitoad (Earth Power) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
166.98 Def + 174 HP for Seismitoad (Sludge Bomb) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
168.32 Def + 173 HP for Seismitoad (Muddy Water) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
170.78 Def + 174 HP for Seismitoad (Icy Wind) vs Seismitoad (2v0)
165.69 Def + 170 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
166.16 Def + 170 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
166.16 Def + 170 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
166.76 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
168.80 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Alolan Ninetales (0v2 no bait)
164.87 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Chilling Water) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
165.42 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Blizzard) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
166.16 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Dazzling Gleam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
166.16 Def + 169 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Ice Beam) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (0v2, 1v2)
166.16 Def + 171 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Weather Ball (Ice)) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
166.76 Def + 171 HP for Shadow Alolan Ninetales (Psyshock) vs Shadow Alolan Ninetales (1v2 no bait)
165.49 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Shadow Ball) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.00 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Dark Pulse) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.00 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Dynamic Punch) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.00 Def + 169 HP for Dusknoir (Poltergeist) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
166.75 Def + 171 HP for Dusknoir (Psychic) vs Dusknoir (2v1)
167.51 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Ancient Power) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v2 with bait)
167.51 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Dragon Claw) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v2 with bait)
167.80 Def + 170 HP for Shadow Giratina Altered (Shadow Force) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v2 with bait)
166.77 Def + 168 HP for Alolan Muk (Gunk Shot) vs Alolan Muk (0v2, 1v2)
167.14 Def + 171 HP for Alolan Muk (Dark Pulse) vs Alolan Muk (1v2 no bait)
167.58 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Muk (Brutal Swing) vs Alolan Muk (0v2, 1v2)
167.58 Def + 169 HP for Alolan Muk (Sludge Wave) vs Alolan Muk (0v2, 1v2)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

173.42 Def flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v0) [1279 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Bug Bite) (0v0)

Member IVs (503)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/15/15 👑	140.75	176.78	178	#1	+1	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
13/15/14	140.75	176.78	177	#3	+0	-1.4	-1.3	-0.0
13/15/12 👑	141.17	177.30	176	#5	-1	-2.4	-1.0	+1.1
13/14/15	140.75	175.94	178	#6	+0	-2.1	-0.6	-1.2
13/14/13 👑	141.17	176.46	177	#7	-1	-2.8	-0.8	+0.3
14/15/14	141.17	176.25	177	#10	-1	-2.6	-0.9	+0.2
14/15/15	141.17	176.25	177	#11	-1	-2.6	-0.9	+0.2
12/15/14 👑	140.33	177.30	178	#15	+0	-5.3	-4.7	-3.3
12/15/15 👑	140.33	177.30	178	#16	+0	-5.3	-4.7	-3.3
13/14/14	140.75	175.94	177	#29	-2	-4.6	-1.9	-1.2
13/15/11	141.17	177.30	175	#32	-4	-3.7	-6.5	-0.9
12/15/13	140.33	177.30	177	#35	-4	-6.6	-5.7	-4.4
13/15/13	140.75	176.78	176	#37	-3	-4.4	-1.0	-1.2
12/14/14	140.33	176.46	178	#38	-6	-8.0	-6.9	-5.1
12/14/15	140.33	176.46	178	#39	-6	-8.0	-6.9	-5.1
13/14/12	141.17	176.46	176	#42	-4	-5.8	-2.7	-0.8
14/15/13	141.17	176.25	176	#44	-4	-5.5	-2.8	-1.0
14/14/13 👑	141.59	175.94	176	#46	-3	-5.4	-2.9	-1.1
12/15/12	140.33	177.30	176	#50	-6	-9.0	-6.3	-4.4
12/14/13	140.33	176.46	177	#56	-7	-9.3	-8.1	-5.3
14/15/11 👑	141.59	176.78	175	#61	-5	-4.3	-7.3	-1.7
14/15/12 👑	141.59	176.78	175	#62	-5	-4.3	-7.3	-1.7
11/15/14	139.49	177.30	178	#67	-7	-12.7	-10.3	-13.8
11/15/15	139.49	177.30	178	#68	-7	-12.7	-10.3	-13.8
14/14/11 👑	142.01	176.46	175	#73	-6	-5.7	-6.8	-1.8
15/15/12	142.00	176.25	175	#79	-6	-6.0	-6.9	-1.8
15/14/11 👑	142.43	175.94	175	#80	-6	-4.8	-6.3	-1.6
15/15/10 👑	142.43	176.78	174	#83	-6	-4.9	-7.1	-1.7
14/15/10 👑	142.01	177.30	174	#86	-6	-5.8	-7.0	-1.0
10/15/14	138.65	177.30	178	#87	+0	-12.0	-11.9	-15.9
10/15/15	138.65	177.30	178	#88	+0	-12.0	-11.9	-15.9
13/14/11	141.17	176.46	175	#93	-7	-7.2	-7.5	-2.9
11/15/13	139.49	177.30	177	#95	-11	-14.0	-11.3	-14.8
11/14/14	139.49	176.46	178	#99	-13	-15.5	-12.5	-15.6
11/14/15	139.49	176.46	178	#100	-13	-15.5	-12.5	-15.6
12/15/11	140.33	177.30	175	#106	-9	-10.3	-11.8	-6.5
15/15/7 👑	142.85	177.30	172	#107	-6	-12.9	-5.4	+0.3
14/14/12	141.59	175.94	175	#108	-7	-7.6	-7.7	-2.7
13/15/10	141.17	177.30	174	#109	-8	-7.3	-7.7	-2.0
15/15/9	142.43	176.78	173	#114	-7	-6.4	-8.2	-2.8
15/14/8 👑	142.85	176.46	173	#115	-8	-13.7	-4.9	-0.4
15/14/10	142.43	175.94	174	#117	-7	-7.4	-7.5	-2.7
14/15/8	142.01	177.30	173	#118	-7	-8.0	-7.9	-2.1
14/15/9	142.01	177.30	173	#119	-7	-8.0	-7.9	-2.1
10/15/13	138.65	177.30	177	#122	+0	-13.3	-12.9	-16.9
12/14/12	140.33	176.46	176	#125	-9	-11.7	-8.0	-6.3
9/15/14	137.81	177.30	178	#127	+0	-14.9	-13.3	-18.0
9/15/15	137.81	177.30	178	#128	+0	-14.9	-13.3	-18.0
10/14/14	138.65	176.46	178	#129	+0	-14.8	-14.1	-17.7
10/14/15	138.65	176.46	178	#130	+0	-14.8	-14.1	-17.7
… 453 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

General · atk≥130.50, def≥164.73 (3600 IV spreads)

Clears 2 anchors across 3 shield scenarios, covering Shadow Ampharos, Mimikyu. Floor across 29 atk breakpoint opponents + 28 bulkpoint opponents. Clears the easiest anchor for every opponent.

130.50 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1, 1v1)
164.73 Def + 177 HP for Mimikyu bulk (Thunder) vs Mimikyu (0v0)

Member IVs (3600)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
13/15/15 👑	140.75	176.78	178	#1	+1	+0.0	+0.0	+0.0
13/13/14 👑	141.17	175.62	178	#2	+0	+0.5	-0.1	-0.2
13/15/14	140.75	176.78	177	#3	+0	-1.4	-1.3	-0.0
14/12/15 👑	141.59	174.26	178	#4	+0	-2.5	-0.7	+0.7
13/15/12 👑	141.17	177.30	176	#5	-1	-2.4	-1.0	+1.1
13/14/15	140.75	175.94	178	#6	+0	-2.1	-0.6	-1.2
13/14/13 👑	141.17	176.46	177	#7	-1	-2.8	-0.8	+0.3
13/12/14	141.17	174.78	178	#8	-1	-2.7	-0.7	+0.3
13/12/15	141.17	174.78	178	#9	-1	-2.7	-0.7	+0.3
14/15/14	141.17	176.25	177	#10	-1	-2.6	-0.9	+0.2
14/15/15	141.17	176.25	177	#11	-1	-2.6	-0.9	+0.2
13/13/15	140.75	175.10	178	#12	+0	-0.6	-1.0	-0.5
14/11/14 👑	142.01	173.94	178	#13	-1	-3.1	-1.2	+1.1
15/15/15 👑	141.58	175.72	177	#14	-1	-1.5	-1.3	+0.1
12/15/14 👑	140.33	177.30	178	#15	+0	-5.3	-4.7	-3.3
12/15/15 👑	140.33	177.30	178	#16	+0	-5.3	-4.7	-3.3
13/11/14	141.17	173.94	178	#17	-2	-4.1	-2.0	+0.0
13/11/15	141.17	173.94	178	#18	-2	-4.1	-2.0	+0.0
14/11/15	141.59	173.42	178	#19	-2	-4.1	-2.1	+0.2
13/13/13	141.17	175.62	177	#20	-2	-2.0	-1.4	-0.3
14/13/14 👑	141.59	175.10	177	#21	-1	-1.9	-1.8	-0.7
14/14/14	141.17	175.41	177	#22	-2	-2.2	-1.8	+0.1
14/14/15	141.17	175.41	177	#23	-2	-2.2	-1.8	+0.1
14/12/13 👑	142.01	174.78	177	#24	-1	-4.0	-1.6	-0.3
15/13/14	142.00	174.58	177	#25	-2	-4.1	-1.7	-0.3
14/10/14	142.01	173.10	178	#26	-2	-3.6	-1.6	+0.8
14/10/15	142.01	173.10	178	#27	-2	-3.6	-1.6	+0.8
15/14/15	141.58	174.89	177	#28	-1	-4.4	-2.1	-0.9
13/14/14	140.75	175.94	177	#29	-2	-4.6	-1.9	-1.2
13/12/13	141.17	174.78	177	#30	-2	-5.0	-2.4	-1.4
14/13/15	141.17	174.58	177	#31	-3	-5.0	-2.4	-1.4
13/15/11	141.17	177.30	175	#32	-4	-3.7	-6.5	-0.9
13/10/14	141.17	173.10	178	#33	-3	-4.6	-2.4	-0.3
13/10/15	141.17	173.10	178	#34	-3	-4.6	-2.4	-0.3
12/15/13	140.33	177.30	177	#35	-4	-6.6	-5.7	-4.4
14/12/14	141.59	174.26	177	#36	-4	-4.8	-5.6	-1.1
13/15/13	140.75	176.78	176	#37	-3	-4.4	-1.0	-1.2
12/14/14	140.33	176.46	178	#38	-6	-8.0	-6.9	-5.1
12/14/15	140.33	176.46	178	#39	-6	-8.0	-6.9	-5.1
15/10/15 👑	142.43	172.59	178	#40	-5	-5.5	-1.6	+0.4
14/13/12 👑	142.01	175.62	176	#41	-3	-2.8	-2.4	-0.7
13/14/12	141.17	176.46	176	#42	-4	-5.8	-2.7	-0.8
15/14/13	142.00	175.41	176	#43	-3	-3.1	-2.7	-0.4
14/15/13	141.17	176.25	176	#44	-4	-5.5	-2.8	-1.0
15/11/14 👑	142.43	173.42	177	#45	-5	-4.4	-5.3	-0.3
14/14/13 👑	141.59	175.94	176	#46	-3	-5.4	-2.9	-1.1
12/13/14	140.33	175.62	178	#47	-6	-6.2	-7.4	-5.8
12/13/15	140.33	175.62	178	#48	-6	-6.2	-7.4	-5.8
15/15/14	141.58	175.72	176	#49	-3	-3.3	-3.1	-1.4
12/15/12	140.33	177.30	176	#50	-6	-9.0	-6.3	-4.4
… 3550 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Tinkaton Mirror Atk · atk≥141.63, hp≥166 (491 IV spreads)

Clears 59 anchors across 9 shield scenarios, covering Ampharos, Shadow Ampharos, Annihilape, Blastoise, +23 more. Mirror atkpoint: passing cohort wins 6 of 9 scenarios vs rank-1 SP Tinkaton (491 IVs pass).

139.88 Atk for Tinkaton (Gigaton Hammer) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v2)
140.65 Atk for Tinkaton (Bulldoze) vs Tinkaton (1v1, 2v2)
133.73 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
134.59 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
140.20 Atk for Shadow Snorlax (Fairy Wind) vs Shadow Snorlax (1v0)
131.09 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Bulldoze) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0, 2v2)
131.65 Atk for Zygarde Complete Forme (Gigaton Hammer) vs Zygarde (Complete Forme) (0v0, 2v2)
131.61 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Gigaton Hammer) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1)
138.31 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Bulldoze) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1)
140.70 Atk for Galarian Moltres (Fairy Wind) vs Galarian Moltres (0v1)
132.92 Atk for Jellicent (Gigaton Hammer) vs Jellicent (2v1)
134.49 Atk for Jellicent (Bulldoze) vs Jellicent (2v1)
132.56 Atk for Giratina Altered (Bulldoze) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
132.65 Atk for Giratina Altered (Gigaton Hammer) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
134.72 Atk for Giratina Altered (Fairy Wind) vs Giratina (Altered) (1v2)
132.17 Atk for Cramorant (Gigaton Hammer) vs Cramorant (1v0)
132.55 Atk for Cramorant (Bulldoze) vs Cramorant (1v0)
131.52 Atk for Lapras (Gigaton Hammer) vs Lapras (0v0)
135.43 Atk for Lapras (Bulldoze) vs Lapras (0v0)
131.57 Atk for Dusknoir (Gigaton Hammer) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
132.56 Atk for Dusknoir (Bulldoze) vs Dusknoir (0v0)
140.23 Atk for Registeel (Bulldoze) vs Registeel (2v2)
135.40 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1)
135.94 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1)
136.15 Atk for Shadow Giratina Altered (Fairy Wind) vs Shadow Giratina (Altered) (0v1)
130.78 Atk for Cresselia (Gigaton Hammer) vs Cresselia (0v2)
131.50 Atk for Cresselia (Bulldoze) vs Cresselia (0v2)
132.83 Atk for Cresselia (Fairy Wind) vs Cresselia (0v2)
131.53 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Forretress (1v0, 2v0)
131.90 Atk for Shadow Forretress (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Forretress (1v0, 2v0)
137.84 Atk for Runerigus (Gigaton Hammer) vs Runerigus (2v2 with bait)
138.75 Atk for Seaking (Bulldoze) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
139.62 Atk for Seaking (Gigaton Hammer) vs Seaking (2v2 with bait)
131.85 Atk for Primarina (Bulldoze) vs Primarina (1v1)
132.29 Atk for Primarina (Gigaton Hammer) vs Primarina (1v1)
130.50 Atk for Ampharos (Gigaton Hammer) vs Ampharos (1v1, 2v2)
130.88 Atk for Ampharos (Bulldoze) vs Ampharos (2v2)
132.54 Atk for Ampharos (Fairy Wind) vs Ampharos (2v2)
135.09 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
135.31 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
140.72 Atk for Shadow Cradily (Fairy Wind) vs Shadow Cradily (0v1, 0v2, 1v2)
130.50 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1, 1v1)
131.16 Atk for Shadow Ampharos (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Ampharos (0v1, 1v1)
133.11 Atk for Annihilape (Bulldoze) vs Annihilape (0v1, 1v1)
133.85 Atk for Annihilape (Gigaton Hammer) vs Annihilape (0v1, 1v1)
135.94 Atk for Annihilape (Fairy Wind) vs Annihilape (0v1, 1v1)
131.78 Atk for Blastoise (Gigaton Hammer) vs Blastoise (1v1)
132.67 Atk for Blastoise (Bulldoze) vs Blastoise (1v1)
136.48 Atk for Miltank (Bulldoze) vs Miltank (2v2 no bait)
136.57 Atk for Miltank (Gigaton Hammer) vs Miltank (2v2 no bait)
130.78 Atk for Corviknight (Bulldoze) vs Corviknight (2v0)
131.45 Atk for Corviknight (Gigaton Hammer) vs Corviknight (2v0)
131.32 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
133.16 Atk for Shadow Empoleon (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Empoleon (2v2)
131.31 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Bulldoze) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
132.13 Atk for Shadow Feraligatr (Gigaton Hammer) vs Shadow Feraligatr (2v2 with bait)
130.51 Atk for Clefable (Gigaton Hammer) vs Clefable (0v1)
132.46 Atk for Seismitoad (Bulldoze) vs Seismitoad (1v0)
133.77 Atk for Seismitoad (Gigaton Hammer) vs Seismitoad (1v0)

Matchup-flipping boundaries (full-battle stat targets, not just damage tiers):

133.61 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v1 with bait) [3072 IVs]
131.93 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v1 no bait) [3584 IVs]
140.75 Atk flips Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v2 no bait) [768 IVs]
136.97 Atk flips Annihilape (Close Combat+Rage Fist) (1v1) [2048 IVs]

Additional matchup flips at this tier's spec (not explained by a single anchor - may involve HP or multi-stat interactions):

vs Forretress (Bug Bite) (2v2)

Member IVs (491)

IV	Atk	Def	HP	Avg rank	Net flips	0v0 Δ	1v1 Δ	2v2 Δ
14/11/14 👑	142.01	173.94	178	#13	-1	-3.1	-1.2	+1.1
14/12/13 👑	142.01	174.78	177	#24	-1	-4.0	-1.6	-0.3
15/13/14	142.00	174.58	177	#25	-2	-4.1	-1.7	-0.3
14/10/14	142.01	173.10	178	#26	-2	-3.6	-1.6	+0.8
14/10/15	142.01	173.10	178	#27	-2	-3.6	-1.6	+0.8
15/10/15 👑	142.43	172.59	178	#40	-5	-5.5	-1.6	+0.4
14/13/12 👑	142.01	175.62	176	#41	-3	-2.8	-2.4	-0.7
15/14/13	142.00	175.41	176	#43	-3	-3.1	-2.7	-0.4
15/11/14 👑	142.43	173.42	177	#45	-5	-4.4	-5.3	-0.3
14/11/13	142.01	173.94	177	#53	-5	-5.6	-6.0	-0.6
14/12/12	142.01	174.78	176	#54	-3	-6.1	-3.1	-1.8
15/13/13	142.00	174.58	176	#55	-3	-6.1	-3.1	-1.8
14/9/14	142.01	172.26	178	#57	-5	-7.6	-2.4	-0.1
14/9/15	142.01	172.26	178	#58	-5	-7.6	-2.4	-0.1
15/12/14	142.00	173.74	177	#59	-5	-5.8	-6.0	-0.7
15/12/15	142.00	173.74	177	#60	-5	-5.8	-6.0	-0.7
14/10/13	142.01	173.10	177	#69	-5	-6.2	-6.2	-0.9
15/12/13 👑	142.43	174.26	176	#70	-5	-4.6	-5.6	-1.6
15/11/15	142.00	172.91	177	#71	-5	-6.7	-6.9	-1.3
14/14/11 👑	142.01	176.46	175	#73	-6	-5.7	-6.8	-1.8
15/9/13 👑	142.85	172.26	177	#74	-6	-12.8	-2.6	+1.1
15/10/12 👑	142.85	173.10	176	#78	-6	-12.5	-3.3	+1.2
15/15/12	142.00	176.25	175	#79	-6	-6.0	-6.9	-1.8
15/14/11 👑	142.43	175.94	175	#80	-6	-4.8	-6.3	-1.6
15/9/15	142.43	171.75	178	#81	-6	-6.5	-4.9	-0.4
15/15/10 👑	142.43	176.78	174	#83	-6	-4.9	-7.1	-1.7
14/15/10 👑	142.01	177.30	174	#86	-6	-5.8	-7.0	-1.0
15/8/14 👑	142.85	171.42	178	#90	-7	-14.5	-1.7	+0.9
15/13/11	142.43	175.10	175	#91	-6	-3.2	-6.9	-2.1
15/13/12	142.43	175.10	175	#92	-6	-3.2	-6.9	-2.1
15/10/14	142.43	172.59	177	#94	-7	-7.1	-6.0	-2.1
15/11/11 👑	142.85	173.94	175	#96	-6	-13.3	-4.3	+0.5
15/11/13	142.43	173.42	176	#97	-7	-7.0	-6.7	-1.9
14/13/11	142.01	175.62	175	#98	-7	-5.0	-7.2	-2.3
15/14/12	142.00	175.41	175	#101	-7	-5.3	-7.3	-2.3
15/10/11	142.85	173.10	175	#102	-9	-13.7	-4.5	+0.2
15/12/11	142.43	174.26	175	#103	-6	-6.1	-7.4	-2.4
15/12/12	142.43	174.26	175	#104	-6	-6.1	-7.4	-2.4
15/9/12	142.85	172.26	176	#105	-7	-15.7	-3.7	+0.1
15/15/7 👑	142.85	177.30	172	#107	-6	-12.9	-5.4	+0.3
15/15/9	142.43	176.78	173	#114	-7	-6.4	-8.2	-2.8
15/14/8 👑	142.85	176.46	173	#115	-8	-13.7	-4.9	-0.4
14/11/12	142.01	173.94	176	#116	-8	-8.8	-7.3	-2.2
15/14/10	142.43	175.94	174	#117	-7	-7.4	-7.5	-2.7
14/15/8	142.01	177.30	173	#118	-7	-8.0	-7.9	-2.1
14/15/9	142.01	177.30	173	#119	-7	-8.0	-7.9	-2.1
14/9/13	142.01	172.26	177	#120	-8	-9.6	-6.8	-2.6
14/10/12	142.01	173.10	176	#123	-8	-9.3	-7.6	-2.5
15/11/12	142.43	173.42	175	#124	-9	-8.3	-7.9	-2.8
14/12/11	142.01	174.78	175	#126	-7	-8.2	-8.0	-2.7
… 441 more not rendered (top 50 by avg rank shown)

Per-matchup IV finder (126 specific matchups - e.g. "which IV beats a given opponent in a given shield?")

Collapsed by default. This is a per-(opponent, shield) lookup: each card is one matchup and the exact IV spreads that win it. For "what do I need vs threat X" use Threats where your build choice matters above, or paste your collection into the scatter. Composite cards (slayer ∩ tier) surface IVs that satisfy a slayer anchor and a stat-cutoff tier; pure slayer-archetype cards live in the Slayer Builds block below, pure tier cards in the Threshold Tiers above.

Show only notable categories (≤ 5% of cohort or ≤ 5 members). Uncheck to see every non-trivial intersection.

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Fortified Ampharos (2 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Fortified Ampharos · def≥176.688, hp≥174

14/15/10 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.01, def 177.30, hp 174, SP #41

One of 2 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Ampharos threshold (def≥176.688, hp≥174). Trades mirror dominance (114/118 wins, vs 118/118 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Fortified Ampharos cutoff.

15/15/10 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.43, def 176.78, hp 174, SP #42

One of 2 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Ampharos threshold (def≥176.688, hp≥174). Trades mirror dominance (108/118 wins, vs 118/118 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Fortified Ampharos cutoff.

Anchors-First Slayer ∩ Fortified Forretress (Shadow) (2 IV spreads)

Anchors-First Slayer + Fortified Forretress (Shadow) · def≥176.606, hp≥174

14/15/10 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.01, def 177.30, hp 174, SP #41

One of 2 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Forretress (Shadow) threshold (def≥176.606, hp≥174). Trades mirror dominance (114/118 wins, vs 118/118 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Fortified Forretress (Shadow) cutoff.

15/15/10 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.43, def 176.78, hp 174, SP #42

One of 2 Anchors-First Slayer members that also clear the Fortified Forretress (Shadow) threshold (def≥176.606, hp≥174). Trades mirror dominance (108/118 wins, vs 118/118 for the top Anchors-First Slayer survivors) for the Fortified Forretress (Shadow) cutoff.

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Cradily (Shadow) Bulk (4 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Cradily (Shadow) Bulk · def≥175.914

Envelope: Straddles band (net -) (avg -0.2, spread 0.4)

15/14/7 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 176.46, hp 172, SP #138

One of 4 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Cradily (Shadow) Bulk threshold (def≥175.914). Trades mirror dominance (100/105 wins, vs 105/105 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Cradily (Shadow) Bulk cutoff.

15/14/8 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 176.46, hp 173, SP #79

15/15/6 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 177.30, hp 171, SP #151

15/15/7 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 177.30, hp 172, SP #91

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Dondozo Slayer (19 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Dondozo Slayer · atk≥142.808, hp≥172

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +0.3, spread 0.8)

15/8/14 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 171.42, hp 178, SP #87

One of 19 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Dondozo Slayer threshold (atk≥142.808, hp≥172). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (105/105) AND clears the Dondozo Slayer cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/7/14 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 170.58, hp 178, SP #136

One of 19 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Dondozo Slayer threshold (atk≥142.808, hp≥172). Trades mirror dominance (100/105 wins, vs 105/105 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Dondozo Slayer cutoff.

15/7/15 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 170.58, hp 178, SP #135

15/8/13 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 171.42, hp 177, SP #143

15/9/11 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 172.26, hp 175, SP #215

15/9/12 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 172.26, hp 176, SP #152

15/9/13 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 172.26, hp 177, SP #95

15/10/10 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 173.10, hp 174, SP #228

15/10/11 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 173.10, hp 175, SP #166

15/10/12 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 173.10, hp 176, SP #106

15/11/10 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 173.94, hp 174, SP #174

15/11/11 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 173.94, hp 175, SP #114

15/12/10 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 174.78, hp 174, SP #121

15/13/7 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 175.62, hp 172, SP #191

15/13/8 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 175.62, hp 173, SP #128

15/13/9 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 175.62, hp 173, SP #127

15/14/7 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 176.46, hp 172, SP #138

15/14/8 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 176.46, hp 173, SP #79

15/15/7 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 177.30, hp 172, SP #91

CMP-First Slayer ∩ Tinkaton Mirror Atk (20 IV spreads)

CMP-First Slayer + Tinkaton Mirror Atk · atk≥141.633, hp≥166

Envelope: Straddles band (net +) (avg +0.2, spread 0.8)

15/8/14 👑 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 171.42, hp 178, SP #87

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Tinkaton Mirror Atk threshold (atk≥141.633, hp≥166). Carries top CMP-First Slayer mirror wins (105/105) AND clears the Tinkaton Mirror Atk cutoff - no tradeoff.

15/7/14 slight atk weight - atk 142.85, def 170.58, hp 178, SP #136

One of 20 CMP-First Slayer members that also clear the Tinkaton Mirror Atk threshold (atk≥141.633, hp≥166). Trades mirror dominance (100/105 wins, vs 105/105 for the top CMP-First Slayer survivors) for the Tinkaton Mirror Atk cutoff.